0 calificaciones0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
49 vistas4 páginas
Intensive quenching or shell hardening has been used since the 1920s. A critical cooling rate above which cracking propensity decreases. The objective of this paper is to explain how it could be used and its processes and advantages.
Intensive quenching or shell hardening has been used since the 1920s. A critical cooling rate above which cracking propensity decreases. The objective of this paper is to explain how it could be used and its processes and advantages.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formatos disponibles
Descargue como PDF, TXT o lea en línea desde Scribd
Intensive quenching or shell hardening has been used since the 1920s. A critical cooling rate above which cracking propensity decreases. The objective of this paper is to explain how it could be used and its processes and advantages.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formatos disponibles
Descargue como PDF, TXT o lea en línea desde Scribd
L. C. F. Canale 1 , N. I. Kobasko 2 and G. E. Totten* 3 Various intensive quenching processes have been reported since the 1920s. A historical overview of these processes is given. Based on the limited information that has been published, it is likely that many of these systems employed neither intensive quenching processing nor did they produce maximum surface compressive stresses. The objective of the present paper is to define intensive quenching, explaining how it could be used and its processes and advantages. Keywords: Heat treatment, Hardening, Intensive quenching, Compressive, Surface residual stress Introduction Every metallurgist has been trained into thinking that increasing cooling rates, especially in the martensitic transformation region, leads to increasing potential for cracking. 1 However, since the 1920s, there have been various, often little known industrial heat treating processes which have been designated as intense, intensive, rapid, drastic, severe, or extreme quenching or shell hardening methods. 28 Figure 1 illustrates the uniform hardened case obtained by shell hardening a carbon steel shaft. 2 The essence of these methods is to harden less hardenable steels using very fast cooling rates in order to impart high compressive stresses and improved fatigue properties to the quenched component. 8 Therefore, in view of the classical training received by metallurgists, why are these processes not accompanied by quench cracking? In fact, what is intensive quenching? In 1964, Kobasko published the rst of an extensive series of papers in which he used the term intensive quenching. His experimental data provided numerical evidence that although it is true that increasing cooling rates result in increasing propensity for cracking, as historically recognised, there does exist a critical cooling rate above which cracking propensity decreases (Fig. 2). 9 Computer simulations were later used to validate and to develop design methodologies. 10,11 Figure 3 illus- trates the results of one such intensive quenching simulation performed and experimentally validated. 11 Note the uniform hardened case surrounding the component and that the case depth is independent of the section size. In the present paper, an overview of the intensive quenching process is provided. This discussion will include the heat transfer criteria that dene an intensive quenching process. The use of intensive quenching in forming maximum surface compressive stresses will also be discussed here. Part 2 of the series will discuss in greater detail the mechanism of residual stress formation during intensive quenching. Discussion As a means of introducing the heat transfer mechanism of intensive quenching, it is helpful to envision an immersion quench of a simple cylindrical steel shape in water. Figure 4 illustrates the three primary heat transfer cooling mechanisms occurring during conven- tional immersion cooling in water: full lm boiling (vapour blanket cooling), nucleate boiling and convec- tive cooling. 12 Each of these cooling mechanisms, which coexist on the steel surface during the quenching pro- cess, is associated with very different heat transfer coef- cients a for full lm boiling a FB 5100250 W m 22 K 21 , for nucleate boiling a NB 51020 kW m 22 K and for convective cooling a CONV 5,700 W m 22 K. The simul- taneous presence and relative stability of these widely varying heat transfer conditions are a signicant factor in inuencing the non-uniform cooling and increased stresses during a water quenching process. A series of patents published from 1967 to 1971 57 describe a quenching process designated as extreme or drastic. These processes utilised water or brine and pressurised tanks (accumulators or bladders) which delivered very high volumes of quenchant, ,3000 gal min 21 , to selected surface areas of the part being quenched. Morio reported that the objective in drastic quenching was to quench the part using sufciently high agitation rates to eliminate lm boiling on the surface which would provide a more uniform quench. The critical cooling rate for this process (drastic quenching) was the cooling rate which is necessary to eliminate lm boiling. The agitation rate/quench severity correlation used to calculate the critical cooling rate was taken from the traditional Grossmann quench severity data shown in Table 1 (Ref. 8). According to Morio, 8 the practical limit for water quenching was H51 . 52 . 0, unless high pressure sprays were employed. Furthermore, it is 1 Universidade de Sa o Paulo, Sa o Carlos, SP, Brasil 2 Intensive Technologies Ltd. Kyiv, Ukraine 3 Associaca o Instituto Internacional de Pesquisa, Sa o Carlos, SP, Brasil Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA *Corresponding author, email GETotten@aol.com 2007 IHTSE Partnership Published by Maney on behalf of the Partnership 30 International Heat Treatment and Surface Engineering 2007 VOL 1 NO 1 DOI 10.1179/174951407X169196 impossible to tell what the agitation rate in a quench tank is by visual observation, i.e. mild, moderate, good, etc. This is further complicated by the fact that quench tank agitation is notoriously non-uniform. Intensive quenching differs from drastic or extreme quenching, as dened in the literature, in that during intensive quenching only convective cooling occurs. Thus heat transfer is limited by the thermal conductivity of the steel. Another denition of intensive quenching is a quenching process that produces maximum surface compressive stresses. 13 Mei has taken the approach reported by Morio even further by stating that an agitation rate sufcient to provide a Grossman quench severity value of .6 . 0 is required to provide an intensive quenching process. 14 However, in addition to the limitations of the use of Grossman H-values, the approach reported by Mei is based on trial and error experimentation. Heat transfer during quenching is described by the Biot number Bi~ a l R (1) where a is the heat transfer coefcient, l is the thermal conductivity of the metal and R is the radius of the cylinder, ball or half-thickness of a plate. This equation means that heat transfer is proportional to section size (thickness) of the metal being quenched and the heat transfer coefcient at the interface between the cooling metal and the quenchant is inversely proportional to the thermal conductivity of the metal. To obtain high surface compressive stresses in an intensive quenching process, the Biot number must be .18. To more accurately relate the Biot number to size and shape, the generalised Biot criterion Bi V is calculated from Bi V ~ a l L~ a l K S V (2) 1 Representation of 25 kg shaft that was shell hardened: surface compressive stresses were determined to be .1034 MPa 2 Illustration of maximum cooling rate up to which pro- pensity for cracking of AISI 52100 bearing steel increases; however, further increases in cooling rates result in corresponding decrease in propensity for cracking 3 Illustration of computer simulation results of intensive quenching (IQ) through the cross-section of the com- ponent. (a) Room temperature before IQ (b) Austenitizing temperature (c) Initial cooling resulting in tension stress (d,e,f and g) Continuous cooling result- ing in very high compressive stress when component achieves room temperature Table 1 Grossmann quench severity for various quench media 8 Agitation Oil Water Brine None 0 . 250 . 30 0 . 91 . 1 2 . 0 Mild 0 . 300 . 35 1 . 01 . 1 2 . 02 . 2 Moderate 0 . 350 . 40 1 . 21 . 3 Good 0 . 400 . 50 1 . 41 . 5 Strong 0 . 500 . 80 1 . 62 . 0 Violent 0 . 801 . 10 4 . 0 5 . 0 4 Illustration of surface cooling mechanism of solid stainless steel cylinder quenched in water Canale et al. Intensive quenching: Part 1 International Heat Treatment and Surface Engineering 2007 VOL 1 NO 1 31 where the value L is the size characteristic and is calculated from L~ S V K (3) where S is the surface area of the piece being quenched, V is the volume of the piece being quenched and K is the Kondratyev form coefcient (shape factor) which may be found in reference tables such as Table 2 (Ref. 15). Another denition of intensive quenching is provided by the Kondratyev number Kn which is dened numerically by Kn~yBi V ~ Bi V Bi 2 V z1 : 437Bi V z1 _ _ 1=2 (4) Where y, the eld non-uniformity criterion, is dened as y~ - T sf {T m - T V {T m (5) where T sf is the average temperature of the surface of the component being quenched, T m is the temperature of the quenchant and T V is the average temperature over the volume of the component. The value y can also be dened in terms of the generalised Biot criterion Bi V y~ 1 Bi 2 V z1 : 437Bi V z1 _ _ 1=2 (6) These equations indicate that: (i) as Bi V R0, yR1 and T sf <T V . This means that the temperature field on a body to be quenched is uniform (ii) if Bi V R, yR0 and T sf <T m which means that the surface temperature of a body to be cooled is the same as the quenchant temperature, upon immersion into the quenchant. To accomplish this, the relatively high amount of heat being released from the surface of the metal to the quenchant requires not only high agitation rates but also high volume flow rates of the quenchant to remove the heat as fast as it is being evolved from the steel (iii) if there is rapid cooling at the surface upon initial immersion into the quenchant, it can be assumed that the core temperature is essentially unchanged. This is how one achieves a hardened case and maximum surface compressive stresses. A third denition of intensive quenching is that the Kondratyev number for an intensive quenching process will be 0 . 8(Kn(1. It is important to note that an intensive quenching process can be interrupted at the time when maximum surface compressive stresses are formed (time quenching), which will occur at the so called optimal depth of hardened layer. By using the numerical relationships above, it is possible to control the temperature gradient through the cross-section of the component being quenched and to determine the types of residual stresses that will occur. Although a wide variety of time quench processes have been developed, three are among the most common: IQ1, IQ2 and IQ3: (i) IQ1 is a two step process. In the first step, a part is cooled slowly, (in an oil, aqueous polymer solution or molten salt, etc.) to the martensite start temperature, then intensively cooled until the cooling process is complete. 10 In the first step the austenitemartensite transformation is delayed almost completely, so intensive cooling is performed only within the martensitic range. Here the temperature gradient is not large all points of the cross-section uniformly reach the martensite start temperature simultaneously 10,16 (ii) IQ2 also has two steps. In the first step, a part is intensively cooled until the end of nucleate boiling. Then the part is unloaded and air cooled to allow equalisation of the temperature over all cross-sections. After this process, the part is intensively cooled a second time until the cooling is complete. 17,18 There is no nucleate boiling in the second step (iii) IQ3 is the most intensive process, because nucleate boiling is completely prevented. Direct convection is facilitated by intensive jets or water flows until maximum surface compressive stres- ses are achieved. IQ3 can be applied to any parts in which the maximum depth of hardness is desired. 2,1923 The depth of hardness can be optimised by the proper selection of chemical com- position of the steel, to provide shell hardening. Figure 5 illustrates the residual stresses formed on the surface of a cylindrical test specimen as a function of the generalised Biot number Bi V . As the quenching intensity increases, the residual stresses also increase to a maxi- mum then decrease until they become compressive. Table 2 Equations for calculation of Kondratyev shape factor for simple shapes Shape of body K S/V(a) Parallelepiped with sides L 1 , L 2 , L 3 L 2 1 zL 2 2 zL 2 3 _ __ p 2 2 L {1 1 zL {1 2 zL {1 3 _ _ Cylinder of infinite size with height Z 5 : 783R {2 z9 : 87Z {2 _ _ {1 2 R {1 zZ {1 _ _ Sphere R 2 _ p 2 3=R Wedge cut from cylinder V 2 _ R 2 _ _ z p 2 _ Z 2 _ _ _ {1 2 R {1 zZ {1 z2R {1 40 _ _ 5 Residual hoop stresses at surface of solid cylindrical test specimen versus generalised Biot number Bi V Canale et al. Intensive quenching: Part 1 32 International Heat Treatment and Surface Engineering 2007 VOL 1 NO 1 The optimal residual stress distribution in the quenched steel part occurs at the optimal depth of the hardened layer which is dened as DI D opt ~const (7) where DI is the ideal critical diameter or specic size and D opt is the size of the steel part with the optimal stress distribution. The ideal critical diameter is dened as DI~ - abt M Vzlnh _ _ 0 : 5 (8) where a is the average thermal diffusivity (m 2 s 21 ), t m is the time for the core to cool from the austenitising temperature to the martensite start temperature to yield 50% martensite, b is a shape dependent constant obtained from a reference table (see Table 3), V is a constant which equals 0 . 48 for a bar or cylinder and h is dened as h~ T 0 {T m T M {T m (9) where T 0 is the austenitising temperature, T m is the quenchant bath temperature and T M is the martensite start temperature. Conclusions In this brief overview, intensive quenching is dened as a heat transfer process and its corresponding impact on cracking potential and residual stress is described. A description of common time quenching processes incorporating intensive quenching methodologies and the denition of the optimal hardened layer has been given. When properly designed, intensive quenching processes can be used to replace a wide variety of oil and aqueous polymer quenching processes thus providing for substantially lower processing costs and lower environmental impact relative to conventional quench- ing processes. References 1. G. Beck: Mem. Etud. Sci. Rev. Metall., 1985, 82, 269282. 2. R. F. Kern: Heat Treat., 1986, 18, (9), 1923. 3. H. Kurz: US Patent 1828325, October 20, 1931. 4. R. H. Hays, J. E. Sansom and K. D. Gladden: US Patent 3506501, April 14, 1970. 5. B. Paddock: US Patent 3517676, June 30, 1970. 6. R. H. Hays, J. E. Sansom and K. D. Gladden: US Patent 3589697, June 29, 1971. 7. J. E. Sansom: US Patent 3515601, June 2, 1970. 8. A. Morio: Kinzoku Zairyou, 1977, 17, (3), 4553. 9. N. I. Kobasko: Metalloved. Termich. Obrab. Metall., 1964, (2), 5354. 10. N. I. Kobasko: in Theory and technology of quenching, (ed. B. Liscic et al.), 367389; 1992, Berlin, Springer-Verlag. 11. B. L. Ferguson, N. I. Kobasko, M. A. Aronov and J. Powell: Proc. 19th Heat Treating Society Conf., (ed. S. Midea and G. Pfaffmann), 355362; 1999, Materials Park, OH, ASM International. 12. H. M. Tensi, A. Stich and G. E. Totten: in Steel heat treatment handbook, (ed. G. E. Totten and M. A. H. Howes), 157249; 1997, Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press. 13. G. E. Totten, N. I. Kobasko, M. A. Aronov and J. Powell: Ind. Heat., 2002, 69, (4), 3133. 14. D. M. Mei: Proc. 7th Int. Cong. on Heat treatment and technology of surface coating, Vol. 2, 6271; 1990, Moscow, Vneshtorgizdat. 15. N. I. Kobasko, A. A. Moskalenko, G. E. Totten and G. M. Webster: J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 1997, 6, (1), 93101. 16. N. I. Kobasko and W. S. Morhuniuk: Investigation of thermal and stress state for steel parts of machines at heat treatment, 24; 1981, Kyiv, Znanie. 17. N. I. Kobasko: Alloyed steel quenching method, Patent of Ukraine No. 27059, 2000. 18. N. I. Kobasko: Inventors Certificate No. 797243, Class C 21 1/56, USSR. 19. N. I. Kobasko: Method of quenching steel parts made of high- alloy steels, Patent of Ukraine No. 4448, Information Bulletin No. 6-1, 1994. 20. N. I. Kobasko: Quenchants, results of science and engineering, Vol. 23, 127166; 1989, Moscow, VINITI. 21. N. I. Kobasko: Quenching apparatus and method for hardening steel parts, US Patent 6364974 B1, Docket No. 6949- 1, 2000. 22. K. Z. Shepelyakovskii and B. K. Ushakov: Proc. 7th Int. Cong. on Heat treatment and technology of surface coatings, Vol. 2, 3340; 1990, Moscow, Vneshtorgizdat. 23. N. I. Kobasko: Adv. Mater. Process., 1995, 148, (3), 42W42Y; 1996, 150, (2), 40CC40EE; 1998, 153, (2), 36FF36HH; Dec. 1999, H31H33. 24. N. I. Kobasko: WSEAS Transactions on Systems, 2005, 4, (9), 13941401. Table 3 Ideal critical sizes of DI various shapes made of AISI 1045 steel* Parts shape K, m 2 b DI, mm Formula Number Martensite 99% Martensite Unbounded plate L 2 1 _ p 2 p 2 9 . 87 13 . 9 19 . 7 Square plate L 2 5L 3 54L 1 8L 2 _ 9p 2 1 . 125p 2 11 . 1 14 . 7 20 . 08 Round plate, 4Z5D 4Z 2 _ nz4p 2 _ _ n 2 0 z4p 2 _ __ 4 11 . 3 14 . 9 21 Unbounded cylinder D 2 _ 4n 2 0 4n 2 0 23 . 13 21 . 3 30 . 10 Unbounded parallelepiped L 1 5L 2 L 3 5 L 2 _ 2p 2 2p 2 19 . 74 19 . 65 27 . 8 Finite parallelepiped L 1 5L 2 L 3 54L 1 L 2 _ 2 : 06p 2 2 . 06p 2 20 . 36 20 28 . 2 Sphere D 2 _ 4p 2 4p 2 39 . 5 27 . 8 39 . 3 Finite cylinder Z5D D 2 _ p 2 z4n 0 _ _ p 2 z4n 2 33 25 . 4 35 . 9 Cube, L 1 5L 2 5L 3 L 2 _ 3p 2 3p 2 29 . 6 24 . 1 34 *n 0 is a root of the Bessel function, n 0 <2 . 405. Canale et al. Intensive quenching: Part 1 International Heat Treatment and Surface Engineering 2007 VOL 1 NO 1 33