Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
SCHOOL YEAR
EVALUATION
ANNUAL
Robert Jones
EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER
2011/12
SCHOOL/SUBJECT/GRADE LEVEL
MIDYEAR
OTHER GENERAL
COMPREHENSIVE
PROGRESS TOWARD GOAL(S) AND EVIDENCE REVIEW Domain 1: Planning & Preparation
1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content/ Pedagogy 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1c: Selecting Instructional Outcomes
INNOVATIVE PROFICIENT BASIC UNSATISFACTORY
1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction 1f: Designing Student Assessments
for and teaching students what their specific IEP goals are and teaches them skills to be independent of him when they are in their general education classes (8/8 students were able to tell me their specific IEP goals and what they were doing to accomplish their goal(s)). Mr. Jones recognizes the value of and understands students interests and cultural heritage. As an example, students are always reading a whole class book, which features different ethnicities. Mr. Jones consistently posts outcomes, which represent high expectations, rigor and different types of important learning. The outcomes are connected to a sequence of learning. All instructional outcomes are clear, written in the form of students learning, and suggest viable methods of assessment (student IEP Notebooks). Lessons and units have a clearly defined structure around which activities are organized, and progression is even, with reasonable time allocations. Time is evenly divided in the classroom and split between work time, IEP Goal Work, and Whole Class reading/activities. All learning activities are suitable to his students and to their IEP goals. Mr. Jones learning activities show significant cognitive challenge, with some differentiation for groups work, whole class, and oneon-one student conferences. Groups are appropriately varied. When students are in his Study Skills class, he appropriately applies whole class, small group, and one on one conferring. His classroom materials and resources are suitable to students, support the instructional outcomes, and are designed to engage students in meaningful learning. Mr. Jones is data driven and authentically collects, reflects, and acts on the data presented to him on students achievement. Instructional outcomes are assessed regularly, and the criteria are clear to his students. Mr. Jones has clearly communicated to the students their IEP goals, given them appropriate work which is aligned to their goals, and effectively progress monitors those goals adjusting planning/instructional practice when appropriate. He has clear systems in place to effectively progress monitor the students on his IEP case load and the students assigned to his th th classroom 5 and 6 periods. Mr. Jones is proficient approaching innovative in this domain. Other Pertinent Evidence and Artifacts: Classroom routines (Student Work, IEP Time, Whole class teaching/activity) Effective Use of High Leverage Teaching Moves CatWalks Student IEP Goals Student IEP Folders
Based upon observations, artifacts, and conferences, this performance is deemed to be proficient overall in this domain.
INNOVATIVE
PROFICIENT
BASIC
UNSATISFACTORY
Mr. Jones displays high standards of conduct and is responsive and proactive to student disengagement or misbehavior. His responses to inappropriate behavior are appropriate, successful, and respect the dignity of the student. The classroom is safe and the furniture arrangements provide an effective learning environment. Other Pertinent Evidence and Artifacts: Classroom routines (Student Work, IEP Time, Whole class teaching/activity) Effective Use of High Leverage Teaching Moves CatWalks/Observations Student IEP Goals Student IEP Folders Based upon observations, artifacts, and conferences, this performance is deemed to be proficient overall in this domain.
Domain 3: Instruction
3a: Communicating with Students 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3c: Engaging Students in Learning
INNOVATIVE
PROFICIENT
BASIC
UNSATISFACTORY
INNOVATIVE
PROFICIENT
BASIC
UNSATISFACTORY
4d: Participating in a Professional Community 4e: Growing and Developing Professionally 4f: Showing Professionalism
Mr. Jones is accurate in his assessment of his teaching. If anything, he is his own worst critic as he has extremely high expectations of himself to be able to meet ALL of the needs of his students and at the same time try to meet ALL of the needs of teachers. Mr. Jones is able to appropriately hit the reset button on his practice based on student performance (February mid-year goal check in, after MAP data indicated no/negative growth). He is able to accurately assess his teaching and those of his colleagues to help achieve specific instructional and learning outcomes. Mr. Joness system for maintaining information on student assignments and progress is effective. Mr. Jones has clear tracking systems for communicating students progress toward their IEP goals and communicates them effectively to students, parents, and teachers. He runs prepared, urgent, efficient IEP meetings. He is well respected by his colleagues both for his passion and professionalism as a teacher. Mr. Jones actively seeks out opportunities for professional development to enhance his content knowledge and practice (Grading/Evaluation Conference, IEP Online). He welcomes feedback from colleagues and administration and participates actively in PLCs (IEP Survey, Study Teams). Mr. Jones did a better job this year of navigating PLCs to fit what he needed to work on for his own professional development. It is expected he will be able to have multiple opportunities to join PLCs, which are committed to Standards Based Grading. Mr. Jones is a strong voice of reason for all students, but specifically students with IEPs and works to ensure all students receive a fair opportunity to access learning and succeed. He maintains an open mind in team and school decision-making and often is willing to lead discussions in staff meetings (IEP Service Delivery Model, Grading/Evaluation Staff Meeting). Mr. Jones is currently serving as an IEP teacher for 6 graders. He is in his third year of teaching at Bradley. He has many formal and informal leadership positions at the local and national level. This year he served as the sole IEP OnLine pilot teacher and IEP On-Line Trainer. He has also sought out and participated in the Grading/Evaluation ad Hoc Committee. In addition Mr. Jones co-authored a research article on bilingual education and co-presented at two National Bilingual Conferences in both Louisiana and California. Mr. Jones is committed to the full-inclusion model for students with IEPs. Other Pertinent Evidence and Artifacts: Study Team Staff Meetings IEP Meetings Study Team Leader Meetings Even though he is only in his third year of teaching, based on my observation, Mr. Jones is deemed proficient in this domain.
th
Mr. Jones is aware of and actively seeks out resources and support. For the coming year he will have the opportunity to work with Joan Helper, Bradley Literacy Coach to plan, execute, and reflect on lessons directly related to non-fiction reading strategies. As Bradley moves along in its pursuit of providing a quality education for each and every student, it will be essential for Bradley staff to continue their collective pursuit in providing accurate grades and evaluation, which truly reflects a students progress based on either Washington State Standards or National Common Core Standards. Staff for the 2011/12 school will be collectively reading A Repair Kit for Grading: 15 Fixes for Broken Grades by Ken OConnor. This book will allow staff to have a common framework from which to build a schoolwide policy on grading and evaluation.
Mr. Jones is a valued staff member at Bradley and I look forward to supporting him in both his Student and Professional Goals for the 2012/13 school year
Employee Comments
THE EVALUATION OF THIS EMPLOYEE FOR THE FOLLOWING SCHOOL YEAR SHALL BE:
General Evaluation Comprehensive Evaluation
During the evaluation period documented in this record, it is the evaluators judgment, based upon observation and conferences that the employees overall performance continues to meet the criteria contained in the domains listed in the table below at or above the Proficient level.
During the evaluation period documented in this record, it is the evaluators judgment, based upon observation and conferences that the employees overall performance is no longer proficient in one or more of the following criteria contained in the domains listed in the table below and the following actions will occur: Has dropped below Proficient but overall performance is Basic and requires a Support Plan in order to achieve a Proficient rating in all domains. Overall performance is unsatisfactory and requires a Performance Improvement Plan which may lead to probation.
Overall Satisfactory Performance is determined by meeting the appropriate performance schedule of the collective bargaining agreement between Seattle Education Association and Seattle Public Schools.