Thus, not only that we refined the Lorenz's conversions, but we understood their meaning.

Let's assume that we are right, but what to do with another conclusion resulting from the above conversions, conclusion about dependence the frame of reference dependence of the time flow.Can it really be true that time is relative? I will remind that owing our model, the relativity of space automatically removed from the agenda. And what about time? If it is relative-this is by no means clear. Twins paradox is a direct and strongest stroke on this result. They can argue that it is precisely assumptions about relativity of time ,in combination with the assumptions about relativity of space, that give us famous formula of the composition of velocities: U +V - a particular case of the general formula. V = U V 1+ 2 C But this law of the composition of velocities gives us mathematical description of the invariance of the speed of light (experimentally derived fact).What to do? Is it true that We are able to get this result without assumption about relativity of space and time? It turns out that it is so. Not only that we shall get t2his result, but we shall refine it and understand its hidden meaning How? Again, owing to our model. Preparatory to carrying out this program, we shall make a few very important comments, Which further will help us to understand the chain of reasoning. Note: we must change our previous understanding of a few things, which hinder understanding of the ultimate truth. With this purpose for a start it would have been better to gain an understanding of a formula, for the complete energy of the particle E= MC 2 . It is very important, because further it will determine the direction of our considerations. So from formula E= MC 2 , M0 , we may obtain the expression for the taking in consideration that M = V2 1 2 C 2 energy: E= EK + M 0C , on conditions that V<<c where, EK is kinetic energy of the particle, but mo c - is a rest energy.

Exactly this case needs wide discussion. Something is not clear there, that is why let us remember that in the grounds of our considerations exists hypothesis that, any particle is something ripple, resilient weight distribution. If it is so, then it is very difficult to imagine that the particle may move as one integral, by a portion of velocity V, having thereby some kinetic energy EK . Present assumption contradicts as common sense so the principle of distribution of interaction of terminal velocity, so if the particle cannot move as one integral, there arises the natural question how does it move? It moves much more complicated than we could imagine. As this particle is something integral and its parts are combined by resilient powers, any little mixture of its center follows to the distribution of progressive wavy process. It is clear that every motion of the particle is a complicated act of interaction of the center with its environment. Also it is clear that the motion of the center without progressive - oscillatory motion of its environment is impossible. I will go further and express one more bold idea: exactly environment supports the motion of the center, and exactly those Internal Powers which exist between the parts of the particle. In particular their time changes and phase lag, finally causes its motion.

The fact that on practice we can see only progressive motion, it is easily explained by little wave-length of particle and large frequency. So, according to all aforesaid, one may formulate as some rule of the motion: Any motion of the particle (body) by steady velocity is a result of interaction of the center with environment, without this interaction there is no motion. Present rule, as it is not difficult to understand, once again confirms the fact that in the nature everything has its reason: if external powers are the reasons of change of the particle velocity, then the internal powers are the reasons of maintenance of the particle velocity. Also it is clear that if the particle was not something resilient allocation, it would not have been expected that it could maintain motion, without external interference, as inertia is not the property of mass as it is, but is a result of resilience of the construction of the elementary particles. Now, let us return to our general line of discussion and all aforesaid deduction about inertia leave aside as some material for consideration, for those who may be interested in it. So let us go on: if the idea that every particle during its motion does not only move but, also oscillates, then automatically the idea arises that the particle should have some energy, responsible for the internal oscillation or for internal respiration. How one should compute this energy? It is very important, because the total of every possible energy stored in this particle gives the complete energy, which in its turn defines the particle conduct in every physical process. Formula E = MC 2 is one of the greatest creation of the human mind, is not able to lay claim on the role of complete energy, because of the simple reason, that describes only the part of the whole energy, which is responsible for the motion of the particle, as an object of mass m. Actually, formula E = MC 2 simply shows us the following: the rest energy of the particle,
2 times, and this surplus of the energy, is C2 stored in the particle in face of energy of deformation ( I will remind that every particle while motion turns from sphere into Ellipsoid) having spherical symmetry the particle possess the energy equal to M 0C 2 , obtaining Ellipsoid symmetry, possesses

while motion by the velocity V increased 1

. It is quite clear, as changes of the form of the particle should be V2 1 2 C absolutely connected with expenditure of the energy from the outside, what is reflected in increase of the particle energy. But the particle during motion not only becomes deformed but oscillates too. If formula E= MC 2 responds deformation, then it is not clear, what responds oscillation and internal respiration? The question is not easy one, this part of energy one could found knowing the nature of the internal powers; But we are still fur from it. What one can do? There is the only way to suppose any version and examine it in actual fact. I understand that the reader will have some unpleasant feeling; there are quite many assumptions. Here is my answer: I am quite sure, that after creation of harmonious theory, the great part from them will turn from the category of accepted into the category of natural results. But it will be in the future, but at present let us be satisfied with what already exists. Anyway, as a formula for the energy of internal oscillation I propose:
energy equal to

M 0C 2

E = MCV

(10)

It means that the complete energy of the particle during motion by a velocity V, equals (11) E = MC 2 + MCV

Or in case of recopying in the other form, we will receive

V 1+ V C E = MC 2 1 + = M 0C 2 C V 1 C

(12)

Anyway possessing the formula of the complete energy, let us try to conceive it deeply. As a preliminary let us usher in some stigmas for its components. Let us mark the energy of progressive motion by EN , but internal energy by ET then complete energy equals E= E N + ET Where EN = MC 2 but ET = MCV We have already gained an understanding of one of the components of the complete energy E N , it is interesting what we can say about it's another component? ET = MCV -internal energy Privately V=0, ET also turns into null, this result is completely obvious, as in the state of rest there are no internal oscillation. The second research, which is a consequence of the present formula, concludes in that internal energy, increasing by the increase of the velocity. This research is also quite obvious, because as much is the velocity of the particle, as much energy should be concentrated in its environment, in order to make the center to move with a high speed; as the center does not move itself. If the internal energy did not depend on the velocity, and had some constant value, then scarcely it would have been possible to maintain motion of the center in every kind of velocity. So the type of formula ET =mcv at least till the present moment, does not contradict that, for what it was invented. The third research, arisen from the formula ET = MCV concludes in that, by increasing of the speed, internal energy increases faster than the progressive energy. It is very interesting. But from the other side, I would like to clarify, what is hidden under this, why the particles are arranged so, that are made to store more and more energy inside of them? It turned out that the answer is not so difficult. By increasing of the velocity particle becomes not only deformed, but also becomes solid, what in its turn causes increasing of resiliency of internal powers. That is why to maintain the velocity in the present situation is much more difficult and consequently more energy should be saved in order to maintain motion. Now having some general opinion about the both components of the complete energy, let us try to extract some useful conclusions from the formula for the complete energy itself.

It would have been necessary to formulate these conclusions in face of some rules, as they are very important and we will utilize them further often. As it is Rule 1 Every portion of the energy, obtained by the external particle, consequences increase as of progressive so internal energy. In other words, it either grows simultaneously or diminishes, it is clear. Rule 2 Energy of the particle always definitely allocates between its components. It is impossible that the particle in some circumstances stored its whole energy somehow, but in other circumstances in some other way, it is clear, but it would have been necessary to explain it. If in any situation, the energy has been allocated otherwise, for example one of the components accepted more (or less) energy, than the other component should have accepted more (or less) energy too (See rule 1), then it would have resulted increase or (diminish) of the general energy. But it is impossible, so maintenance of balance between the components of the whole energy is the main essence of the Rule 2. Rule 3 In case of any internal reason if, internal balance of the particle is violated, then it will always aspire to restore it. In other words in the particle works some clever mechanism, which regulates internal order. This rule is as important, that one should hold on it, for the beginning we should gain an understanding of in what is expressed violation of the internal balance, in what kind of situations it is practicable, but further to try to understand the principle of the work of socalled clever mechanism.