1

SCORING RUBRIC IN POETRY WRITING OF THE 2ND YEAR STUDENTS IN HIGH SCHOOL
I. ACTIVITY TASK : POETRY WRITING

II.

OBJECTIVES

In this activity the student is expected to: 1. Construct a poem about the given topic. 2. Present the poem. 3. Appreciate the essence of the topic through poetry writing.

III.

DESCIPTION OF THE TASK

Each student should construct and present a poem with the topic Education: a right or a privilege and will pass the task on the assigned date.

IV.

SCORING RUBRIC DIRECTION : below are the criteria and their indicators as appeared in the rubrics. Read each indicator of the criterion and rate using numerical value/scale. Take note that words or phrases that will spell-out clearly the difference of each rating were made bold for easy use of the rubric.

The format of this rubric was copied from the format of Ms. Irene Christy M. Bacolod, Faculty and Research Coordinator of Mabalacat College, this March 2012.

LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA/INDICATOR/WEIGHT

4 Excellent A. CONTENT (50%) 1. RELEVANCE All entries to are the 1 or 2 entry/ies is/are NOT related to the given topic. 3 or 4 entries are NOT related to the topic. 5 or more entries are NOT related to the topic. 2. STRUCTURE a. - Consist of 4 stanzas -Each stanzas should have 4 lines - Measurement - Coherence - Order At least 5 of the indicators were satisfied. 1-2 of the indicators is/are NOT satisfied. 3-5 of the 3 Very Satisfactory 2 Satisfactory 1 Poor RATING WEIGHT

related topic.

The format of this rubric was copied from the format of Ms. Irene Christy M. Bacolod, Faculty and Research Coordinator of Mabalacat College, this March 2012.

LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA/INDICATOR/WEIGHT

4 Excellent -Others (pls. specify) 3 Very Satisfactory 2 Satisfactory indicators are NOT satisfied. All of the indicators are NOT satisfied. b. Diction All words used were appropriate. No ERROR in using figurative language. 1 or 2 word/s is/are NOT appropriate. 1 or 5 error/s was/were made in using figurative language. 3 or 4 words are NOT appropriate. 6 or 10 errors were made in using figurative language. 5 or more words are NOT appropriate. 11 or more ERRORS were made in using figurative language. 1 Poor RATING WEIGHT

The format of this rubric was copied from the format of Ms. Irene Christy M. Bacolod, Faculty and Research Coordinator of Mabalacat College, this March 2012.

LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA/INDICATOR/WEIGHT

4 Excellent c. Correct Usage 3 Very Satisfactory 2 Satisfactory 6 or 10 ERRORS were committed in terms of using correct grammar, punctuation marks. 11 1 Poor or more were in RATING WEIGHT

No ERRORS are 1 or 5 ERRORS committed terms of in was/were using committed in

ERRORS committed

correct grammar, terms of using punctuation marks. correct grammar, punctuation marks. d. Originality All entries in the 1 or 2 entries in the poem is/are NOT originally constructed by the student and was copied from any resource material or fellow student.

terms of using correct grammar, punctuation marks.

3 or 4 entries in the poem are NOT originally constructed by the student and were copied from any

5 or more entries in the poem are NOT originally by

NOTE: If there will be a poem are case that all entries are originally copied from any constructed by the

constructed

resource material or student and were fellow student. The NOT copied from

the student and were from copied any

teacher will call the any resource attention student/s. of the material or fellow He/she student.

resource material resource material or fellow student. or student. fellow

need to justify/defend

The format of this rubric was copied from the format of Ms. Irene Christy M. Bacolod, Faculty and Research Coordinator of Mabalacat College, this March 2012.

LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA/INDICATOR/WEIGHT

4 Excellent the work. B. PRESENTATION (30%) 1. PERSONAL APPEARANCE a. Well-posed b. Uses appropriate dress c. Eye to eye contact d. Speaks enthusiastically e. Tone of voice f. Proper hand gestures, facial expression through voice Others (pls. specify)
2. MASTERY a. b. c. Speaks clearly Easy to understand Pronounced correctly the words At LEAST 5 of the given indicators of an excellent performance are ONLY 1 to 2 of the given indicator of an excellent performance is/are ONLY 3 to 4 of the given indicator of an excellent performance are ALL of the given indicators are NOT satisfied.

3 Very Satisfactory

2 Satisfactory

1 Poor

RATING

WEIGHT

At least 6 of the given indicators of an EXCELLENT performance are satisfied.

ONLY 1 to 2 of the given indicators of an EXCELLENT performance is/are NOT satisfied.

ONLY 3 to 4 of the given indicators of an EXCELLENT performance is/are NOT satisfied.

ONLY 5 or more of the given

indicators of an EXCELLENT performance is/are satisfied. NOT

and

emotion

The format of this rubric was copied from the format of Ms. Irene Christy M. Bacolod, Faculty and Research Coordinator of Mabalacat College, this March 2012.

LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA/INDICATOR/WEIGHT

4 Excellent
d. e. Show mastery of the work No interruption satisfied.

3 Very Satisfactory
satisfied.

2 Satisfactory
satisfied.

1 Poor

RATING

WEIGHT

Others (pls. specify)

C. TIME MANAGEMENT (10%)

Submitted and presented on or before the deadline.

Submitted and presented 1 to 5 days after the deadline.

Submitted and presented 6 to 9 days after the deadline.

Submitted and presented 10 days after the deadline.

D. FORMAT (10%)

Poem

should

be At LEAST 7 of the

written in a short bond indicators were paper in portrait form. Place in a white short folder. The short folder should have a full name of the student with the year satisfied. 1 to 2 of the indicator/s is/are NOT satisfied. 3 to 4 of the indicators are NOT satisfied. All of the indicators are

The format of this rubric was copied from the format of Ms. Irene Christy M. Bacolod, Faculty and Research Coordinator of Mabalacat College, this March 2012.

LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA/INDICATOR/WEIGHT

4 Excellent level and section at the right corner of the folder. The title of the poem, name of the owner and the teacher coach and the date 3 Very Satisfactory 2 Satisfactory 1 Poor NOT satisfied. RATING WEIGHT

submitted should be written on the cover page. The font to be use for the texts should be arial with 11 or 12 font size, 1.5 spacing and have a margin of 1 inch on all sides. Scoring rubric.

The format of this rubric was copied from the format of Ms. Irene Christy M. Bacolod, Faculty and Research Coordinator of Mabalacat College, this March 2012.

LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA/INDICATOR/WEIGHT

4 Excellent Others (pls. specify) 3 Very Satisfactory 2 Satisfactory 1 Poor RATING WEIGHT

Final Grade Equivalence of Weighted Ratings: 4 = 100%; 3.0 to 3.9 = 90 99%; 2.0 to 2.9 = 80 89%; 1.0 to 1.9 = 70 79%

The format of this rubric was copied from the format of Ms. Irene Christy M. Bacolod, Faculty and Research Coordinator of Mabalacat College, this March 2012.