Comments to questions in 2012 Congressional District Census General Issues - Question #3 is designed to prey on American ignorance of their heritage,

the Constitution and the meaning of Federalism. As an example, The enumerated powers in the Constitution allows Congress to involve itself in the War on Terror, Taxes, Reducing the Federal Deficit and Federal Spending, Foreign Policy, the War in Afghanistan, and Illegal immigration. There is nothing in the Constitution allowing federal politicians to involve themselves in Health Care, Environment, Economy, Jobs, Social Security, Energy or Education. Question #3 also perpetuates the myth the Federal government is authorized to involve itself in the average Americans life to the degree it does today. This ideology parallels the tyranny the Declaration of Independence decried which led to a revolution and the founding of this country as a Constitutional Republic. Since enactment of the 16th and 17th Amendments federal politicians have used the 16th Amendment to steal money (property) from Americans.1 The 17th Amendment seeks to destroy the Federalism the founders designed. Since their enactment federal politicians have become pimps who have turned state legislatures and governorships into houses of prostitution, each vying for their share of the pot of gold the feds steal from Americans by law since enactment of the 16th Amendment. Politicians in both parties have meddled in the economy, overregulating it, picked winners and losers bringing the United States to the point of bankruptcy. Politicians tell Americans government is the answer, thus denigrating and rendering helpless the private and free economy that allows entrepreneurs to make their own decisions, using their own money, time and talent to create jobs, wealth, happiness, and self-esteem that goes with it. Question #7 Rating state government is addressed in part above. Floridas debt is over 1 Billion dollars. Much of that debt is tied to federal mandates and programs designed to regulate, enslave and create dependency. Section III, Domestic issues, Question #4 Indicates government must create jobs. Government is a poor creator of jobs. It creates bureaucracies that interfere with the free market and the entrepreneurs who are job creators. It creates government jobs that hamper, impeded and prevent job creation. The economic uncertainty spoken of in this question ignores the fact that government through politicians like Barney Frank and Chris Dodd et al have created the economic morass this country faces today. Republicans helped by aiding and abetting the process. They refuse to make government get out of the way which would restore American freedom by allowing future generations to replicate what the generations before them created before 1913 and the enactment of the Federal Reserve, the 16th and 17th Amendments, the New Deal and the Great Society. Question #8 asks if I support repealing Obummercare and replacing it with something that will address the high cost of health care while maintaining the quality of care. Article 1, 8 was never amended to permit government involvement in individual health care. The question ignores the fact that one of the reasons health costs are so high is government mandates and politicians meddling in American Health Care. I do not support replacing the current system with something else other than free market solutions absent government interference. I support politicians getting out of the way, making it harder for lawyers to get rich with frivolous law suits and letting the American people make their own deals and choices. I also support more of the same regarding light bulbs, toilets and other necessities Congress has forced on Americans. Section IV, National Defense: The Constitution states Congress is responsible for declaring war and sending Americans into harms way. However, Congress has ignored this responsibility since the end of WWII.

The power to tax is the power to destroy. A government which lays taxes on the people not required by urgent public necessity and sound public policy is not a protector of liberty, but an instrument of tyranny. Calvin Coolidge.

As a student of history who was born to a generation of Americans who dove under their desks in school during the Cold War, I understood the necessity of stopping monolithic communism, especially since Europe was unable to defend itself after World War II. I accepted and was a willing participant in this countrys efforts to thwart Communist designs that led to the Cuban Missile Crisis and the war in Vietnam. I am a veteran of both. Europeans have lived safely and comfortably under the American defense umbrella since the end of WW II. During this period, they were able to design and implement the failed socialist regimes on their people that American politicians are now trying to emulate. They helped the UN gain strength at the expense of U.S. blood and treasure.2 During this period neoconservatives and likeminded socialists abrogated their authority by shortening their leg of the three legged stool that supports the Constitution. This allowed the growth of an Imperial presidency seen in H.W. Bushs Gulf War I, Clintons war in the Balkans, G. Bushs War in Iraq, and Obummers adventure in Libya, all of which were, and should have been UN actions only involving other countries other than the United States. I refuse to support more of the same which gives meaning to my no checkmark on the questionnaire. CERTIFICATION AND REPLY The Republican National Committee does not have my support to strengthen a party that places a foreign ideology and party over the Constitution and my country. I comprehend and support the necessity for trouncing Obummer and his fellow Marxists in the upcoming election. However, I am not convinced the Republican establishment, as currently constituted, is the vehicle to do the job. I do not want more of the same by a different name. Republicans currently control the purse strings and could have stopped Obummer and his useful idiots antiAmerican and anti-Constitutional agenda in its tracks long ago. Speaker Boehner could have stopped it with any of the continuing resolutions thus far debated. By refusing to act, establishment Republicans showed cowardice or proved there is little difference in the ideology or the agenda of both parties. The Republican hierarchy showed itself as a group of feckless cowards with no moral, ethic, or principled standards. If left to their own devices, absent the Tea Party, they would get us to the same place Democrats want us. The only difference is they would have gotten us there slower. The central theme of this questionnaire is money. Politicians of both parties are rich, they got rich peddling influence favors and feeding at the trough of inside trading etc., Special Interests with more money than me control the agenda so I see no need to make Republicans richer and more powerful by furnishing contributions of money for the propagation of opinions in which I disbelieve, abhor and believe are sinful and tyrannical. I understand what John Adams meant when he said, We have no government armed with the powers capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. Republicans make his point. Yours in the Bill of Rights,

Copy to: Florida Legislature, Governor Scott et al

Think Agenda 21, ICLEI and one world government etc.