Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Dr Steve Wallace
Introduction I t d ti
Teach at NCTU, NTHU and ITRI technical writing teacher
and editor- Watched rejection editorj Written 13 textbooks used in 28 universities, including: How to write and submit your paper in 18 weeks: a textbook for Taiwanese academic writers writers : : works with 86 Colleges, Universities and Research Institutes. Over 4,300 papers U i iti dR h I tit t O 4 300 edited Collected Reviewers and Editors Comments - Research researchers
of average quality will get a favorable recommendation from both referees is about 11% (= 1/9).
- 1993 APS OBSERVER newsletter a publication of the American Psychological Society newsletter, Society.
7%
Poor quality supporting figures Outside the scope of journal Not enough contribution to field Authors did not follow manuscript instructions Poor writing style and use of English Title not representative of study Subject of little novel interest or not generally applicable li bl Poorly written discussion
7%
4% 9%
16%
2%
7%
13%
Redundancy Verb Tense V bT Passive Voice Errors Weak Verbs Verb Agreement O tt g co pa so s Omitting comparisons Clear Pronouns "It" and "There" Noun Verb issues 4% 4% 11%
15%
17%
13%
7% 13%
16%
IEEE G id li Guidelines
If you wish, you may write in the first
person singular or plural and use the i l l l d th active voice. Remember to check spelling. If your native language is not English, please get a native English-speaking Englishcolleague to proofread your paper.
Symposia Frank Anderson, Sam B. Niles, Jr., and Theodore C. Donald, Member, IEEE
active voice, except i instances in which ti i t in i t i hi h the author is unknown or the interest focuses on what is acted upon.
AMA Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors. 10th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University
Press; 2007.
possible: We will ask authors that rely heavily on use of the passive voice to rere-write manuscripts in the active voice. i
Guidelines for authors. International Society for the Study of Trauma Web site: The Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. http://www.isst-d.org/jtd/journal-trauma-dissociation-info-for-authors.htm. http://www.isst-d.org/jtd/journal-trauma-dissociation-info-forp // g/j /j Accessed March 5, 2009.
Ophthalmology O hth l l
"Active voice is much preferred to passive voice,
which should be used sparingly....Passive sparingly Passive voice...does not relieve the author of direct responsibility for observations, opinions, or observations opinions conclusions (e.g., 'The problem of blood flow was investigated ' vs 'We investigated the investigated... vs. We problem of blood flow...').
Guide for authors. Elsevier Web site: Ophthalmology: Journal of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. p gy y p gy http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620418/authorinstructions. Accessed March 5, 2009.
The essentials of BMJ style. BMJ Publishing Group Web site: British Medical Journal. http://resources.bmj.com/bmj/authors/bmj-househttp://resources.bmj.com/bmj/authors/bmj-house-style. Accessed March 5, 2009.
style....Write in the active [voice] and use t l W it i th ti [ i ] d the first person where necessary.
The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA) has similar advice:
voice is acceptable in expository writing i i t bl i it iti and when you want to focus on the object or recipient of the action rather than on the actor. actor.
Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Science S i
"Use active voice when suitable,
Behavioral Ecology B h i lE l
Nature N t
"Nature journals like authors to write in
the ti th active voice as experience has shown i i h h that readers find concepts and results to be conveyed more clearly if written directly. directly.
Accessed March 4, 2009.
How to write a paper: writing for a Nature journal. Nature Publishing Group Web site: Nature. http://www.nature.com/authors/author_services/how_write.html. http://www.nature.com/authors/author_services/how_write.html.
co e o your using ou s stead come from you us g nouns instead of verbs. This makes your sentences longer because you need additional meaningless verbs to complete them. A th Associate Editor, Journal of i t Edit J l f Retailing
s d at e ed to ep is to find a native editor to help you with your verb use. Strong verbs move sentences. Helping verbs often sentences confuse the reader in your technical descriptions. R i d i ti Reviewer, Journal of J l f Technology Management
espec a y you especially your methods section! Try et ods sect o y cutting them into individual units of complete thought instead of stringing together thoughts without stopping for breath. R i t i f b th Reviewer, Journal of Water Resource Management
Use pronouns clearly (they, which, them, this, it, he, she, etc.)
Line 12 on page 3 of your paper is
an example of your ongoing problem l f i bl using pronouns clearly. There are at least 3 different nouns it could refer to. You must make your pronoun references clear! -3rd Reviewer, Reviewer IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging
this result. There are several possible explanations for this result.
interact with the system system. Systems can incorporate equipment so that the user can interact with the system.
Clear
English has shades of meaning Th Thesaurus
Short
A SENTENCE SHOULD CONTAIN NO UNNECESSARY WORDS, WORDS A PARAGRAPH NO UNNECESSARY SENTENCES, FOR THE SAME REASON THAT A DRAWING SHOULD HAVE NO UNNECESSARY LINES AND A MACHINE NO UNNECESSARY PARTS. PARTS. - WILLIAM STRUNK, JR.
provided that if
prior to before
subsequent to after
in case if
is found to be is
is capable of can
in no case never
happens to be am/is/are
by means of by
be deficient of lack
a majority of most
Clear
IF YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN SOMETHING SIMPLY, YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND IT WELL. - ALBERT EINSTEIN
correct/incorrect precise/imprecise,
accurate/inaccurate
verb tense often. Sometimes you e b te se o te So et es change several times within a sentence. sentence It makes it difficult to understand what has been done and what you are still planning to do h t till l i t d Reviewer, IEEE Signal Processing Letters
Remember: R b
Relative terms, such as more, higher and
greater, require a reference f t i f for comparison and do not make sense alone
g s should checked st English s ou d be c ec ed first! There are many basic errors that should have been corrected throughout this paper. Reviewer, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and T ti Vi li ti d Computer Graphics
Journal of Retailing Dont emphasize the importance of your paper Don by tti down on other papers. Your b putting d th Y references are probably your reviewers and they are sensitive. When citing other papers avoid iti Wh iti th id using negative terms.
o o e of s e ds or one o his friends will be you reviewer. your e e e Rejected for Poor English English
however, is that ...... ...... Th k problem with Smiths explanation is The key bl ith Smith S ith ith l ti i that ...... ...... It seems th t S iths understanding of the X that Smith Smith ith d t di f th framework is questionable. questionable.
p problem, however in Y , Y The X benefit of Smiths approach are Smith not applicable to Y Y
Reviewers comments R i t
I dont think you treated Smith fairly in
your lit t literature review, his insights deserve i hi i i ht d more respect. You forgot to include Smith as a reference in your paper His work is paper. fundamental to understanding your research. h
Conclusion C l i
Handout of our talk available
Books
editors, understand Taiwanese English, educational comments Three Stage translation process to preserve meaning and clarity