Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
CONTENTS Full computation of earthquake hazards and disasters Examples of integrated earthquake simulation
Dynamic structure analysis methods used for design non-linear due to materials and large-deformation
earthquake
amplification
fault mechanism
earthquake simulation
action simulation
structure response
model construction disaster prediction steel structure concrete structure geotechnology buildings/architecture data: underground results: SGM data: structure results: damage
GIS
action
people agents community society
macro-analysis
geological scale
micro-analysis
engineering scale
EXAMPLE OF MACRO-MICRO ANALYSIS: EXAMPLE OF MACRO-MICRO ANALYSIS: YOKOHAMA CITY SIMULATION YOKOHAMA CITY SIMULATION
Comparison of synthesized strong ground motion with data observed at 13 seismograph sites
139.5E 140.0E 140.5E
as06
Yokohama City
35.5N
35.5N
hd06
epicenter
is06
0 35.0N 139.5E 140.0E
August 11, 1999 Lat. Long. Depth Strike 35.4N 139.8E 53km 62
Dip
E 40[km]
35.5N
35.5N
70[km]
35.0N 139.5E 140.0E 35.0N 140.5E
30[km]
p w ave veloc.[m /sec] s w ave veloc.[m /sec] density[kg/m ]
3
mate.1 mate.2
mate.3 mate.4
-500 -1000
-2500 -5000
400[m] 400[m]
50[m]
model 1 (optimistic)
model 2 (pessimistic)
a) case 1
velocity [kine] 0.02 0.01 0.00 0 2 4 6
8 time [sec]
b) case 2
8 time [sec]
opt.
10
1 0.25
1.25
2.25
3.25
4.25 frequency[Hz]
PGV [kine] SI
PGV [kine] SI
PGV [kine] SI
max. velocity[kin] 1
0.1
0.1
0.01
measured
a) case 1
2 sites have consistent errors, probably due to poor modeling
Construction of Models
presumption of standard material and structure properties standard structure model
Automatic Construction
automatic construction of GIS data to standard structure model highest redundancy needed
EARTHQUAKE DISASTER SIMULATION EARTHQUAKE DISASTER SIMULATION DEVELOPMENT OF VIRTUAL TOWN/CITY DEVELOPMENT OF VIRTUAL TOWN/CITY
size [m] virtual town virtual city 1 virtual city 2 virtual city 3 300x300 1,000x2,000 400x440 300x300 data GIS GIS with CAD GIS with CAD GIS with AI earthquake MMAM MMAM MMAM MMAM structure SDOF for building VFEM for buildings VFEM for infrastructures action none none none
B
N
60[m]
300[m] 300[m]
number of layer 1 2 3 4 5 bottom soil type surface soil loam sand clay fine sand rock density(g/cm ) 1.625 1.550 1.800 1.750 1.900 1.850
3
147 buildings
Sv (m/s) 120.0 135.0 400.0 200.0 425.0 600.0 Pv (m/s) 204.0 229.5 680.0 340.0 722.5 1020.0
Fundamental Period varies from 0.2 sec. to 0.7 sec. T=0.02H T=0.03H
data CAD data for all buildings borehole data for underground
room
data CAD data for all buildings borehole data for underground
RESPONSE OF INFRASTRUCTURES AND RESPONSE OF INFRASTRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS IN VIRTUAL CITY 2 BUILDINGS IN VIRTUAL CITY 2
CLOSE-UP VIEW OF STRUCTURE: CLOSE-UP VIEW OF STRUCTURE: DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF BRIDGE 1 DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF BRIDGE 1
X direction
Y direction
Z direction
300[m]
ground mold
300[m]
Methodology of Integration
Application of DataBase management techniques Federation-type DataBase with aid of interpreting programs (agents) interpreting program: supports data exchange between kernel and each simulation program
interpreter program A
IES
Methods
A find structure from GIS put take
object of mediator for structure A put data to simulation program take results of simulation program
Computational Science Approach: seek to automatic coding of mediator program by taking full advantage of inheritance
digested code
construction of mediator analysis of I/O analysis of loop and code for mediator condition prediction of variable
infrastructures gas pipe line concrete pier steel pier ground mold particular material properties & mechanism for earthquake resistance
3 1
3 10
20 8 14 1x1 10
8 1
NON-LINEAR RESPONSE OF NON-LINEAR RESPONSE OF INFRASTRUCTURES IN VIRTUAL CITY 3 INFRASTRUCTURES IN VIRTUAL CITY 3
steel pier
ground mold
unified visualization will contribute to form common recognition of possible earthquake disaster
ACTION SIMULATION: ACTION SIMULATION: EVACUATION SIMULATION USING MAS EVACUATION SIMULATION USING MAS
Evacuation Simulation
predict evacuation process in underground towns, high-rise buildings, department stores, schools, etc. use intelligent agents to mimic people in panic state
Agent Ability Thought See(): Wall, Corridor, Agent Think(): Destination, Direction, Speed Move(): Direction, Check
MODELING FOR DYNAMIC STRUCTUREIS & MODELING FOR DYNAMIC STRUCTUREIS & EVACUATION ANALYSIS EVACUATION ANALYSIS
modeling strategy structure data for each floor data for escalator
evacuation path corridors determined from structure data Exit determined from escalator data structure is arranged to be used for structure analysis and for evacuation analysis
no damage
damage
multi-agent analysis is possible for structures to which dynamic structure analysis is made.
70 0[
m]
buildings
500 [m]
bridge
SIMULATION RESULTS (2): SIMULATION RESULTS (2): THREE EARTHAUEK SCENARIOS THREE EARTHAUEK SCENARIOS
Case 1 Case 1 Case 2
data source GIS of boring data of Tokyo Metro-police commercially available GIS for structure data
-7500
-7000
multi-agent simulation
EXAMPLE 1 EXAMPLE 1
EXAMPLE 2 EXAMPLE 2
EXAMPLE 1 EXAMPLE 1
EXAMPLE 2 EXAMPLE 2
1 structure response
Future Tasks
Advancement of structure data stored in GIS new exclusive sensing of buildings and structures Advancement of natural disaster preparedness, mitigation and recovery significant need for integration of technologies for natural disasters