Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Helsinki Department of City Planning and Transportation Kansakoulukatu 1 A FI-00099 City of Helsinki
E q u i ty - Ba s e d T r an s p o r t a t i o n P lan n in g , P o l i c y a n d P r a c ti c e
(A collaborative investigation of an unusual concept in Helsinki Finland)
1. In troduct ion
The following summary presents some first background information on a collaborative investigation just getting underway in the City of Helsinki, looking into the concept of equity-based transportation planning and policy at the level of a city. This is the first peer project in this series and is being carried out under the direction of the Helsinki Department of City Planning and Transportation over the period 15 February to 13 April 2012. It is being followed closely by a group of international colleagues who share these interests..
E q u i ty - Ba s e d T r an s p o r t a t i o n P lan n in g , P o l i c y a n d P r a c ti c e
(A collaborative investigation of an unusual concept in Helsinki Finland)
Core strategy
Over the last decades we have incessantly been told about ("sold") many kinds of transportation strategies or techniques which variously promise great things for mobility and well-being: sustainable transportation, green transportation, clean, smart, soft, active, low-carbon, fuel-efficient, carfree, intelligent, liveable and more. But while there are many cities in which such concepts have been put into place as projects, with varying degrees of success, the truth is that as things stand in 2012 we have yet to find and put to work a (a) single, (b) strong, (c) inclusive, (d) measurable central theme around which to organize policies and decide investments that are, at once, (i) coherent, (ii) consistent and (iii) checkable. In most cities our transport policies and actions all too often based on ad hoc individual decisions and rough assemblages of policies, projects and services, some good, some less good, but which as a whole are not really systemic. And, not surprisingly, the city and the people suffer from this. At best what we are seeing are good measures implemented here and there, with luck more or less well integrated and coordinated, but at the same time the big investments that that are being made in the sector are not consistent with a single base strategy. This is dangerous because if we have no strong central core and test to which all actions and decisions can be disciplined, we are going to suffer a policy of bits and pieces, some better, some worse, and the whole badly lacking. This is a real problem, as we are seeing in city after city. But all that said, we need to bear in mind that it is not easy to create a coherent system -- unless we have at the core a central indicator or metric that will allow us to align all our individual decisions and pull the whole thing together in a coherent package in which all the individual decisions reinforce each other so that they all move in the same direction. This project proposes to look at one central metric by which the entire program and service package can be judged. Namely that of equity, a concept which is potentially as powerful as it is, until now, unknown.
Page 3
E q u i ty - Ba s e d T r an s p o r t a t i o n P lan n in g , P o l i c y a n d P r a c ti c e
(A collaborative investigation of an unusual concept in Helsinki Finland)
We are well aware that in many parts of the world the transportation arrangements are grossly unfair to the very large proportion of the population. Some cities, some projects do better than others but the broad central trend is there, and it is not good. They systems and services offered are often outstandingly and visibly unfair to the elderly and to the frail, to those who cannot drive and do not have access to cars, those who cannot afford to own and operate a car, including those who may work and own and use a car but who really are not sufficiently well-off to be able to afford the high costs associated with car ownership and use, those who are penalized in their daily and family lives as a result of having to travel long distances in often inconvenient or even absent public transportation, to those who would like to walk or bicycle in safety, to children in many aspects of their day to day lives, to women who by and large are not fairly treated by the existing transportation arrangements, and the long list goes on. In a word, in most cities n this planet for the great majority of all people the present transportation arrangements are inequitable. The all-car no-choice transportation arrangements of the 20th century are not doing the job for the transportation majority. They are unfair, inefficient and uneconomic. So what if we were to turn the situation around and take as a starting point for public policy and investments in the sector not so much the twentieth century values of speed and distance but 21st-century values of equity , social justice and deep democracy. This project under the supervision of the city of Helsinki is in the two months ahead engaging an open exploration of the concept of equity-based transportation systems in Helsinki. The project method keys on the participation of a small team who will meet with a good cross-section of groups and interests in various parts of Helsinki, and discuss with them both in general and very specifically such things as: what is already going on in their sector to create more equitable mobility arrangements; what are the ongoing plans and goals; and what would be needed from city or national government, or other sources eventually, in order to achieve some significant steps toward a more equitable transportation system. One of the key pillars behind this program is a belief that, properly engaged, the move to equity-based transportation can lead to greater efficiency and economy both for specific groups and individuals, and also for the city and its region as a whole. That it is to say that it is going to be a step up, and not a step down. At the end of the day, once you understand and accept the basic principle of equity a huge number of other good things follow. And you have only to look in one place to see if you have it -- and that is on the streets of your city. If the mayor, all public servants, and the top 20% of your community travel by the same means as the other 80%, you have an equitable system. If not, not! This is team work. As principle investigator, Eric Britton is working under the direction of the City Planning Department/ Transportation Division and with their team, to help organize and chair a set of "peer encounters", presentations, brainstorming sessions, dialogues and events in cooperation with a group of leading thinkers and actors in the field in Helsinki. Britton is serving as moderator and rapporteur for these events, and upon completion of a month long work cycle submit a draft report presenting main findings and recommendations. To be submitted to the group in advance draft form for comment and guidelines for finalization prior to being formally submitted to the Department of City Planning.
Page 4
E q u i ty - Ba s e d T r an s p o r t a t i o n P lan n in g , P o l i c y a n d P r a c ti c e
(A collaborative investigation of an unusual concept in Helsinki Finland)
Project Schedule
1. 15 to 29 February. Planning stage. Development of program plan, contact suggestions, schedules, and basic supporting documentation. 2. 1 to 14 March. Initial outreach program and finalization of Finnish documentation. Development and communication of basic documentation and interview and meeting arrangements with a broad cross-section of individuals, groups and programs working in sector. (Click here to get an idea of the organisations to be contacted for the project.) 3. 14 to 20 March. Interviews, site visits and conversations with key groups and interests in the greater Helsinki area to be carried out. (Interview and dialogue process will in fact continue over the entire period through 29 March.) 4. 21 to 23 March. Invitational three-day Master Class will be held in the auditorium of the Department of City Planning, with the formal presentations and public discussions running from 09:00 to 11:30 each day, followed up by continuing private discussions and exchanges with the team over the remainder of those days. Session 1: Equity and Transport. 2. Equity and Transport in Helsinki. 3. Strategic responses at project and overall systemic levels. 5. 24 to 28 March. Continuing contacts with key interest groups, as well as review sessions with the teams responsible for organizing the ongoing programs generating the Helsinki Master Plan, Metropolitan Area Transport System Plan and the Program for Promoting Cycling in Helsinki. On 27 March a final public presentation and discussion to be organized in the auditorium of the Department of City Planning, both to report on mission findings, and seek further information and views to be included in the final report and recommendations 6. 29 March to 13 April. Report drafting, internal review is limited distribution to external reviewers, and report finalization and submittal on thirteen April.
Page 5