Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Contents
1. 2. Simplified interaction criterion Background: derivation of simplified expression from EN 1993-1-1, Annex B 2 2
Created on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
Page 1
1.
Created on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
This expression may be used within the limitations on value given in section 2.2.5. This expression is a simplified version of expression (6.62) in section 6.3.3 of EN1993-1-1. In deriving this expression kzy has been taken as 1.0 and kzz has been taken as 1.5. The parameters in this expression are as follows: NEd, My,Ed, Mz,Ed are as defined in EN1993-1-1 section 6.3.3. Nmin,b,Rd is the lesser of
z fy A y fy A and . M1 M1
f y W pl .
My,b,Rd is equal to LT
M1
f y W pl
M1
M0
) when M1 = M0.
2.
2.1
Designing columns to EN 1993-1-1 requires verification according to expressions 6.61 and 6.62, given in clause 6.3.3(4) as shown below:
(6.61)
M1
LT
M1
M1
Page 2
(6.62)
M1
LT
M1
M1
Writing y
N y,Rk
M1
as N y,b,Rd , z
N z,Rk
as N z,b,Rd , LT
M y,Rk
M1
as M y,b,Rd and
M z,Rk
M1
as
(ex 6.61)
N Ed N z,b,Rd
Created on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
+ k zy
M y,Ed M y,b,Rd
+ k zz
M z,Ed M z,cb,Rd
(ex 6.62)
2.2
Simplification
The determination of interaction factors k is made using Annex A and Annex B of EN1993-1-1. The values of these factors are often difficult to determine, especially when using Annex A. In order to avoid the time-consuming calculation of these factors, a simplified expression derived from (ex 6.61) and (ex 6.62) is needed. The simplified expression should use specific values for the interaction parameters that will be conservative over the practical range of bending of columns. For reasons discussed below, the chosen values are: kyy = kzy = 1.0 and kyz = kzz = 1.5. The range of bending moment diagram for which these values are valid is examined below. Because the same values are chosen for kyy and kzy, and for kyz and kzz, the use of a single expression is justified because with restraints at the same level in both directions, Nz,b,Rd will always be less than Ny,b,Rd. The expression in Section 1 therefore uses only Nz,b,Rd , which it refers to simply as Nb,Rd.
Page 3
N Ed N y,b,Rd
N Ed N y,b,Rd
From Table B.3 for straight-line bending moment diagrams, C my = 0.6 + 0.4 Therefore 0.6 + 0.4 0.556 0.556 0.6 0.4 = 0.044 0.4 = 0.11
0.11
Created on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
For the case where the member is pin-ended (y = 0 and thus Cmy = 0.6), the use of kyy = 1 will still be safe if a lower limit to the value of NEd/Ny,b,Rd applies:
N Ed 0.61 + 0.8 N y,b,Rd 1.0 and thus N Ed 1.0 0.6 = 0.83 N y,b,Rd 0.48
Table B.2 says that kyy should be found from Table B.1 Table B.1 gives:
N Ed k yy = C my 1 + 0.6 y N y,b,Rd
Because
N Ed N y,b,Rd
1.0 1.6
= 0.625 0.4
From Table B.3 for straight-line bending moment diagrams, C my = 0.6 + 0.4 Therefore 0.625 0.6 + 0.4 0.625 0.6 0.4 = 0.025 0.4 = 0.0625
Page 4
0.0625
Table B.2 says that kyz should be found from Table B.1 Table B.1 gives kyz = 0.6kzz, Therefore:
N Ed k yz = 0.6 C mz 1 + 2 z 0.6 N z,b,Rd
Created on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
For
N Ed N z,b,Rd
For k yz 1.5 , C mz =
1.5 1.44
= 1.04
0 .4
From Table B.3 for straight-line bending moment diagrams, C mz = 0.6 + 0.4 And 1 1
Table B.2 says that kyz should be found from Table B.1 Table B.1 gives kyz = 0.6kzz, Therefore:
N Ed k yz = 0.6 C mz 1 + z 0.2 N z,b,Rd
Page 5
For
N Ed N z,b,Rd
For k yz 1.5 , C mz =
1.5 1.08
= 1.389
0 .4
1.08
From Table B.3 for straight-line bending moment diagrams, C mz = 0.6 + 0.4 And 1 1 Therefore kyz = 1.5 is valid for all cases
For Class 3 sections:
Table B.1 gives kyz = kzz, Therefore for elastic properties of RHS sections, :
Created on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
k yz = C mz 1 + 0.6
N Ed
z
N z,b,Rd
N Ed k yz C mz 1 + 0.6 N z,b,Rd
N Ed N z,b,Rd
1 , k yz C mz (1 + 0.6 1 ) = 1.6 C mz
k yz
For k yz 1.5 , C mz =
1.5 1.6
= 0.938
1.6
From Table B.3 for straight-line bending moment diagrams, C mLT = 0.6 + 0.4 0.4 Therefore 0.938 0.6 + 0.4 Therefore kyz = 1.5 for
0.845
z
0.338 0.4
= 0.845
Table B.2 says that kzz should be found from Table B.1 Table B.1 gives kzz for plastic I and H sections:
Created on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
N Ed C mz 1 + 2 z 0.6 N z,b,Rd
N Ed C mz 1 + 1.4 N z,b,Rd
For
N Ed N z,b,Rd
1 , k zz C mz (1 + 1.4 1 ) = 2.4 C mz
k zz 2.4
For k zz 1.5 , C mz =
1.5 2.4
= 0.625
From Table B.3 for straight-line bending moment diagrams, C mz = 0.6 + 0.4 0.4 Therefore 0.625 0.6 + 0.4 Therefore kzz = 1.5 for
RHS sections
z
0.025 0.4
= 0.0625
0.0625
Page 7
For
N Ed N z,b,Rd
For k yz 1.5 , C mz =
1.5 1.8
= 0.833
0 .4
From Table B.3 for straight-line bending moment diagrams, C mz = 0.6 + 0.4 Therefore 0.833 0.6 + 0.4
y
0.233 0.4
= 0.583
N Ed N z,b,Rd
1 , k zz C mz (1 + 0.6 1 ) = 1.6 C mz
For k zz 1.5 , C mz =
k zz 1.6
1.5 1.6
= 0.938
From Table B.3 for straight-line bending moment diagrams, C mLT = 0.6 + 0.4 0.4 Therefore 0.938 0.6 + 0.4 Therefore kzz = 1.5 for
0.845
z
0.338 0.4
= 0.845
2.2.5
The following tables summarise the maximum i values for the validation of the simplified interaction formulae using specific values for the interaction parameters (i.e. kyy = kzy = 1.0 and kyz = kzz = 1.5).
Page 8
Table 2.1
i limits for validity of kyy = kzy = 1.0 and kyz = kzz = 1.5 for class 1 and 2 sections
I and H sections kyy = 1.0 kyz = 1.5 kzy = 1.0 kzz = 1.5 -0.11 (see note) Valid for all cases Valid for all cases 0.0625
RHS -0.11(see note) Valid for all cases Valid for all cases 0.583
Note: If the column is pin-ended ( = 0), the simplified expression is still valid with kyy = 1,0 if NEd/Ny,b,Rd 0,83. This limit will usually be easily achieved.
Table 2.2
i limits for validity of kyy = kyz = 1.0 and kyz = kzz = 1.5 for class 3 sections
All the sections were analysed in lengths of 4 and 8 m, and using both S275 and S355 steel grades. The applied forces were increased for each section until all of them were in the critical load, this is, until the sum of the three terms of the governing equation (whichever it was for each particular case) was 1. This lead to the following range of loads:
Page 9
0.725
N Ed N b,Rd,z
0.998
0 k zy 0 k zz
0.138 0.2737
This showed that for H-section columns with their height, h, approximately equal to their breadth, b, the proposed equation is safe for (y,z) of (0,0); (0,-0.5); (-0.5,0); (-0.5,-0.5).
Created on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
Page 10