Está en la página 1de 16

circulate inflected forms: circulates; circulated; circulating

1: to move without stopping though a system, place, etc. [no object] Blood circulates through the body. Steam circulates in the pipes. [with object] A pump circulates the water through the filter. Fans circulate the air. 2 a [no object] : to go or spread from one person or place to another Rumors are circulating around town. The report circulated among the students. 2 b [with object] : to cause (something) to go or spread from one person or place to another Stories were circulated about mismanagement. He is circulating a petition asking for a new election. 3 [no object]: to go from group to group at a party or social gathering in order to talk to different people She circulated among her guests.

revenue plural revenues Status: finance

1 : money that is made by or paid to a business or an organization [noncount] The factory lost revenue because of the strike by the workers. The company receives millions of dollars in advertisingrevenue. [=money paid by advertisers] The firm is looking for another source of revenue. [plural] advertising and sales revenues 2 : money that is collected for public use by a government through taxes [noncount] Government officials have reported a decrease inrevenue. [plural] state and federal tax revenues

Affect vs effect These words in some cases can have similar meaning, however, they are very often used incorrectly. Affect is a verb; it means 'to have an influence on or effect a change in', e.g. Your answer will not affect my decision'.

Effect may be used as a noun, as well as a verb. As a verb it is used rather in formal speech and means 'to bring into existence', e.g. He tried to effect a reconciliation between his parents. As a noun it is used with the meaning of 'result, influence', e.g. He has recovered from the effects of his illness.

Continual vs continuous These two adjectives are often confused. Continual means 'very frequent', e.g. I had continual interruptions all morning. Continuous, on the other hand, means 'without any pause', e.g. continuous noise (a noise that never stops).

boost

/ bu:st/ verb [with object]

inflected forms: boosts; boosted; boosting

1 : to increase the force, power, or amount of (something) The farm has boosted [=increased] wheat production by 25 percent. boost [=raise] prices The article discusses a number of ways people can boost [=strengthen] their immune systems. The company needs to find ways to boost [=improve] morale. 2 : to push or shove (something or someone) up from below Sheboosted the boy onto his fathers shoulders. sometimes used figuratively His work on the high-profile lawsuit has boosted him into the political arena. Learn about boost as a noun.

The Latest Obamacare Implosion Inefficient programs that don't solve problems and are passed against the will of the American people seem to be the Obama Administration's forte. Now their high-minded aspirations of a health care revolution are quickly unraveling as fatal glitches in Obamacare become apparent.

Next up for implosion? The Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act, otherwise known as the "CLASS Act," which creates a government-run long term care insurance program too costly to sustain. At a time when entitlement programs in America have spun out of control, liberal proponents of Obamacare were pushing a new one that had no hope of staying afloat. Now, they are trying hide the fact that they were wrong as another bungling layer of Obamacare is exposed. From its creation, the CLASS Act was completely unsustainable as written into law. The problem? Due to the effects of adverse selection, the program would charge high premiums that would deter less risky individuals from participating. Indeed, participating in the CLASS program would only appeal to those in poor health expecting to need long-term care in the future, further escalating premiums. Due to its design, it was clear to Medicare actuaries and even liberal Members of Congress that CLASS would fail before it began. Like so many other aspects of the struggling Obamacare law, this one's flaws are abundantly clear. Brian Blase explainswhy the CLASS Act is broken and how its ill-conceived design would lead to its inevitable collapse or bailout: The main problem is that the program's design will result in a badly skewed pool of participants ... This means healthy individuals are less likely to participate because they do not receive credit in the form of a lower premium, like they would if they purchased [long-term-care] insurance in the private market. Instead, CLASS participants are likely to be disabled individuals who are able to work part-time and individuals who anticipate future [long-term-care] needs. Moreover, the adverse selection problem is exacerbated because individuals earning below the poverty line are subjected to only a $5 monthly premium, and less healthy people are much more likely to be below the poverty line. The artificially low premium for them means that premiums will have to be much higher for others, which will diminish overall enrollment in the program and worsen its long-run solvency. The poor design of CLASS almost guarantees that the program will collapse or need a bailout. Last week, Heritage reported on internal emails sent prior to Obamacare's passage warning the Obama Administration of CLASS's impending disaster. While former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and friends were frantically shoving the 3,000 page health care bill through Congress, they were ignoring vital information about a program that was actuarially unsound and completely unworkable. In fact, as Heritage's Lachlan Markayreported, federal health experts told them via email that CLASS would result in an "insurance death spiral." Congress passed it anyway. Health and Human Services secretary Kathleen Sebelius has since stated that CLASS is "totally sustainable" and "financially unsound." The Department claimed it could solve these problems using its administrative authority, but the only way CLASS could

possibly survive would be via a taxpayer bailout, varying premiums according health status, or by mandating worker participation--none of which are acceptable options. It's time to admit they are fighting a losing battle. Bob Yee, chief actuary for the Health and Human Services office that administers the CLASS Act, recently left the office after being told his services weren't needed. He told The Wall Street Journal that other office staffers were being reassigned. HHS is subsequently denying that they are killing the CLASS Act despite no longer having any employees working in its office. It's likely that the Administration has finally come to the realization that CLASS is beyond help. A bicameral group of Republican Members of Congress are demanding answers in an oversight letter sent to HHSrequesting information on their latest moves and what they knew about CLASS before Obamacare became law. Given CLASS' financial instability, James Capretta and Brian Riedlexplain that Congress' best move is to repeal the law instead of piling debt upon debt with yet another unsustainable entitlement: CLASS is destined to run short of funds, creating pressure for another massive taxpayer bailout. The biggest threat to the long-term prosperity of the country is the massive unfunded liabilities for the nations major entitlement program. The last thing Congress should be doing is adding to the burden of future taxpayers, which is why CLASS Act repeal is the most fiscally responsibleand ethicalcourse to follow. So while HHS tries to cover their tracks by claiming CLASS is still being analyzed, it's clear that the only responsible thing for them to do is admit they were wrong in the first place and end this awful program before it's too late. And more importantly, Congress should repeal Obamacare before the biggest implosion of all hits the American people.

Broad vs wide Both adjectives can be used alternatively in order to describe nouns. However, they are not perfect synonyms. Broad is used to describe the length of something, e.g. a broad back, whereas wide describes the distance between two edges, e.g. wide sleeves.

impress

/ m pr s/ verb

inflected forms: impresses; impressed; impressing

1 : to cause (someone) to feel admiration or interest [with object] Hes trying to impress her. [=he is trying to win her admiration; he wants her to like him] The candidate impressed us with his qualifications. = The candidates qualifications impressed us. What really impressed me was their enthusiasm. = It reallyimpressed me that they were so enthusiastic. often used as (be) impressed We were (favorably/deeply/very) impressedby/with his credentials. I am impressed that you can play the violin so well. I was particularly/especially impressed by their enthusiasm. [no object] Shes bright, ambitious, and eager toimpress. 2 [with object] : to put (something) in someone's mind : to produce a clear idea or image of (something) followed by on or upon The speaker tried to impress the dangers of drugs on the children. = The speaker tried to impress on the children how dangerous drugs can be. [=tried to make the children understand very clearly how dangerous drugs can be] 3 [with object] : to produce (something, such as a picture) by pushing something against a surface a design impressed on the book's cover

President Obamas Jobs Plan is Bad News for Charities President Barack Obama released his plan to reduce the nations burgeoning deficit this week, outlining a number of proposals that will increase taxes and do little to reduce government spending. Also included in the presidents deficit plan and American Jobs Act is a concerning proposal that could signal bad news for charities. President Obama proposes to pay for his $447 billion jobs bill mainly by limiting tax deductions for wealthy Americans. Unfortunately, if enacted, this policy will likely dampen charitable giving and further shift perceived responsibility for social welfare from individual donors to the state. The Presidents plan calls for lowering the rate at which wealthy taxpayers can take itemized deductionsfrom the current rate of 35 percent down to 28 percent, beginning in 2013. The change would affect individuals making more than $200,000 (and families making more than $250,000) per year. This isnt the first time President Obama has suggested this approach. He did so in his proposed 2011 and 2012 federal budgets and in 2009 attempted it as a way to pay for his health care plan. The result of President Obamas proposal will likely be several billion dollars in decreased revenue each year for hospitals, educational institutions, and nonprofits that help the poor. While giving would probably drop only a small percentage, the anticipated amount would total more than the combined annual operating budgets of

the American Cancer Society, World Vision, St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital, Habitat for Humanity, and the American Heart Association. Those who are served by these institutions arent the only ones who would be hurt by decreased giving. Many peoples jobs would also be threatened. Perhaps most importantly, Obamas proposal sends the message that federal bureaucracy can deploy the resources of the wealthy more effectively than civil society can. Decreasing an incentive for charitable giving implies that the state should assume responsibility for peoples needs, even at the expense of vital nonprofit organizations. Churches, ministries, and other community-based institutions, however, are often better equipped to serve people in need. And they often do so at reduced costs. At a time when charities most need resources to care for the hurting and hire more employees, President Obama should seek ways to encourage voluntary giving and protect nonprofit groups. Instead, his proposed jobs bill moves the dial of social responsibility one more notch in the direction of the state.

Beside vs besides Beside is an adverb that means 'next to'. Besides means 'apart from', e.g. Is anyone coming besides Ann?. It can also mean 'what is more', e.g.She has three sons and one adopted daughter besides.

Altogether vs all together Altogether means 'completely, on the whole, with all included', e.g. I'm altogether satisfied with your work. All together, on the other hand, means 'all things present in one place', e.g. I'll put these books all together on the shelf.

in the drivers seat

idiom

: in a position in which you are able to control what happens When his boss went on vacation, he suddenly found himself in thedrivers seat.

$1.5 Trillion in New Taxes Two years ago, as the United States was coming out of the last recession, President Obama was asked how raising taxes on anyone would help with the economy. The President's answer? "Normally you don't raise taxes in a recession, which is why we haven't, and why we've instead cut taxes." Fast forward to today, as America is struggling with zero job growth and a stagnant economy, and the President has dramatically changed his rhetoric, proposing $1.5 trillion in new taxes on the American people and the country's job creators. Those massive tax increases come as part of the President's plan to reduce the nation's out-of-control debt, but rather than address the underlying spending problem, it will further deepen America's economic quagmire and only serves to stall the real reform American needs in order to get on a path of fiscal sanity, as Heritage's Alison Fraser explains: Obama is demanding a 'balanced' approach as though somehow hiking taxes is both fair and necessary. But this notion that he is pushing -- half tax hikes and half spending cuts -- is beyond the class warfare message it sends. It is a tactic. A tactic to stall the real reforms that our leaders in Washington must undertake now in order to avert a fiscal, economic and moral crisis. Real reform is necessary because of the depth and scope of America's spending nightmare. "The federal government today is claiming roughly one-fourth of total economic output -- about 25 percent of gross domestic product," Heritage's Patrick Knudsen writes. That's a post-World War II record, and it's a huge drag on the economy since all that spending is paid for by taxes and borrowing, which reduce the amount available for investment in the private economy. And down the road, the outlook isn't good: Social Security is growing at a rate of 5.8 percent per year, Medicare at 6.3 percent, and Medicaid at 9 percent. Unless those programs are fundamentally reformed, their costs will keep going up, and taxes will have to keep being increased to pay for them. Disappointingly, the President yesterday retreated from his previous overtures to entitlement reform and took Social Security reform off the table while proposing minor cuts to Medicare and Medicaid--rather than the reform that would make a significant difference for the country. Obama's plan is bad news for our nation's defense as well, posing even more radical cuts for an already under-funded military.

Setting aside for a moment the fact that the President's plan ignores America's core spending problems, his plan to drastically raise taxes is coming at a time when the country can least afford it. How will the latest Obama tax increase play out? Heritage's Curtis Dubay explains: The new revenue would come from allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire for families and small businesses earning more than $250,000 a year, limiting their deductions, and the Presidents new Buffett Rule that would further raise these job creators' taxes in some way which the President has not defined. He also wants to eliminate deductions, credits, and exemptions. This is a war the President is waging on success--as if socalled fat cats were the root of our spending problems. The President has set his sights on the wealthy despite the fact that the top 10 percent of earners in America already pay about 70 percent of federal income taxes. And taxing America's job creators will only serve to reduce productivity, slow economic growth, depress wages and salaries, and decrease household wealth. To use the President's own words, raising taxes in bad economic times would "take more demand out of the economy and put businesses in a further hole." Where is that President Obama today? Raising taxes will not fix our budget and debt crisis. But it can be solved by transforming our entitlement programs, rolling back wasteful and inefficient spending, protecting the nation, and overhauling our punitive, inefficient and noncompetitive tax code, as laid out in Saving the American Dream: The Heritage Plan to Fix the Debt, Cut Spending and Restore Prosperity. America is facing an unemployment crisis, a debt crisis, a spending crisis, and an entitlement crisis. Instead of making things better, President Obama wants to make matters worse by icing that nightmarish cake with massive tax increases. Two years ago, President Obama emphatically renounced raising taxes in a recession. Now, with the 2012 election looming, he has changed his tune and is taking aim at America's job creators in a game of class warfare designed to play to his liberal base. Job creation has fallen by the wayside.

deliberate

/d  l b r t/ adjective

comparative and superlative forms: more deliberate; most deliberate

1 : done or said in a way that is planned or intended : done or said on purpose I dont think that was a mistake; I think it wasdeliberate. [=intentional] a deliberate [=planned] attempt to trick people 2 : done or decided after careful thought a deliberatechoice/decision

3 : slow and careful She spoke in a clear, deliberate manner/way. He advocates a slow and deliberate approach to the problem. Learn about deliberate as a verb.

ensure

/ n  u / verb [with object]

inflected forms: ensures; ensured; ensuring

: to make (something) sure, certain, or safe They took steps toensure the safety of the passengers. We want to ensure [=make certain/sure] that it doesn't happen again.

scope

/ sko p/ noun

1 : the area that is included in or dealt with by something [noncount] The essay is sweeping/comprehensive in scope. [=the essay includes information, ideas, etc., about many topics] The law is of limited scope. [=the law applies only to a few situations, people, etc.] I was impressed by the size and scope of the book. That problem is somewhat beyond the scope of this discussion. We want to widen the scope of the study. [singular] This study has a wider/broader scope than previous studies on the subject have had. 2 [noncount] : space or opportunity for action, thought, etc. [noncount] A bigger budget will allow more scope [=room] for innovation. The work has been good, but there's still some scopefor improvement. Learn about scope as another noun and as a verb.

guideline plural guidelines

/ ga d la n/ noun [count]

: a rule or instruction that shows or tells how something should be done usually plural The government has issued new guidelinesfor following a healthy and balanced diet. calling for stricterguidelines Here are some basic guidelines for helping you choose a dishwasher.

Economic vs economical Although these words seem similar, they convey different meanings. Economic can have two meanings: 1) 'relating to the production, development, and management of material wealth of a country', e.g. economic history, the country's economic future or 2) 'bringing accordingly big profit', e.g. We must charge an economic price. Economical, on the other hand, means 'sparing, without extravagance', e.g. This car is very economical on petrol.

Can vs may May should be used when we 'allow somebody to do something', e.g. You may go to the party if you wantor when we ask for permission, e.g. May I open the window?. Can should be used only when we talk about our ability to do something, e.g. I can speak English.

Economic vs economical Although these words seem similar, they convey different meanings. Economic can have two meanings: 1) 'relating to the production, development, and management of material wealth of a country', e.g. economic history, the country's economic future or 2) 'bringing accordingly big profit', e.g. We must charge an economic price. Economical, on the other hand, means 'sparing, without extravagance', e.g. This car is very economical on petrol.

Solyndra Scandal Ends Green Jobs Myth President Barack Obama's solution for America's unemployment woes has been a stubborn campaign to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on economic "stimulus"-much of it on so-called "green jobs." Report after report has shown the approach to be a total failure. And now, a new scandal involving Solyndra, a bankrupt solar panel company in California, should be the final nail in the coffin for the governments meddling in the free market. "[W]e can see the positive impacts [of the stimulus] right here at Solyndra," Obama claimed when he spoke at the company's newly unveiled factory in May of last year. He was correct that the results of his stimulus would be on display at that factory. But he was wrong that those results would be positive. Little more than a year later, the company has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and plans to lay off more than 1,000 employees. The Solyndra factory where Obama spoke was built after the company received a $535 million loan guarantee from the Energy Department as part of the stimulus's green jobs push. "Through the Recovery Act, this company received a loan to expand its operations," Obama noted. "This new factory is the result of those loans." But "everyone knew that the plant wouldnt work," according toa former Solyndra employee. So why was the President so sure of the plants success when he spoke there? What's more, the company was built on "a model that says, well, I can build something for six dollars and sell it for three dollars," according to an industry analyst. That would normally be a red flag for investors. So why did the President claim that "the true engine of economic growth will always be companies like Solyndra"? The answer to both of those questions: The government's decisions are driven by politics and ideology and are divorced from economic reality. Want proof? Take a look at a January 31 e-mail between Office of Management and Budget staff regarding "Solyndra optics" -- that is, how the issue looks in the public's eyes. "If Solyndra defaults down the road, the optics will arguably be worse later than they would be today," they wrote, adding: In addition, the timing will likely coincide with the 2012 campaign season heating up, whereas a default today could be put in the context of (and perhaps even get some credit for) fiscal discipline / good government because the Administration would be limiting further taxpayer exposure letting bad projects go, and could make public steps it is taking to learn lessons and improve / limit future lending. In other words, in January the Administration was essentially letting the 2012 campaign dictate decisions on the federal government's financial involvement with Solyndra. They were not responding to normal profit-and-loss signals, as they should. Had Energy Department bureaucrats been investing their own money, they might have been more

careful. But it was others' money -- taxpayers' money -- at stake. Self-interested investors, who naturally weed out bad investments, were wholly absent. The result: Taxpayers are likely to lose up to $535 million, while the people who made the decision to throw money at Solyndra have, so far, been completely insulated from reprisal. Much attention has been paid to accusations of cronyism in the Energy Department, given that a major Solyndra investor isalso a big Obama donor. But the fundamental lesson of the Solyndra scandal is not that money buys political favors. That now goes without saying. The real takeaway is that government intervention in the economy is a fools errand, as Heritages Nicolas Loris notes: Solyndra exemplifies the governments abysmal track record of picking winners and losers in the marketplace, and the solar company is not the only example of energy stimulus struggles. With a number of targeted energy tax credits set to expire at the end of this year or next, industry groups are lobbying hard for extensions. Especially given the U.S. fiscal situation, this is a time to end all energy subsidiesnot to extend wasteful, market-distorting policies. When the government decides to favor a technology with subsidies, its a good bet that subsidy 'winner' is a loser in the marketplace. Indeed, at least four other companies to receive money from Obama's stimulus package have gone bankrupt, Fox News reports. Even where companies do create jobs, they do so at such exorbitant cost that the effort cannot reasonably be considered a success. To date, The Washington Post reports, the Energy Department loan guarantee program from which Solyndra benefitted has created one new permanent job for every $5.5 million spent. Lend that kind of money to a private business in an industry that doesnt rely on taxpayer support, and it will put hundreds if not thousands to work. Government subsidies are invitations for political favoritism, of course. But more importantly, as engines of job creation, they simply don't work (just ask Spain). Sure, the Administration's "green jobs" program has led to allegations of corruption. But it has also failed even in its foremost task of creating jobs for an economy with a chronic unemployment problem. Columnist Jim Pethokoukis writes, "Solyndra is the logical endpoint of Obamanomics." Unfortunately, the American people are paying the price for getting us there.

suppress

/s  pr s/ verb [with object]

inflected forms: suppresses; suppressed; suppressing

1 : to end or stop (something) by force Political dissent was brutally suppressed. suppressing a rebellion 2 : to keep (something) secret : to not allow people to know about or see (something) The governor tried to suppress the news. The judge may decide to suppress the evidence. [=to not allow the evidence to be used at a trial] She ordered the magazine (to be)suppressed. 3 a : to not allow yourself to feel, show, or be affected by (an emotion) He struggled to suppress hisfeelings of jealousy. She could not suppress her anger. I had to suppress an urge to tell him what I really thought. 3 b : to stop yourself from doing something (such as smiling, coughing, or laughing) that might bother other people I found it hard to suppress a smile [=to keep myself from smiling] when he told me about what happened. She tried to suppress a cough/laugh. [=she tried not to cough/laugh] 4 : to slow or stop the growth, development, or normal functioning of (something) a drug that suppresses the immune system The pill works by suppressing your appetite. suppression /s pr n/ noun [noncount] political suppression the suppression of evidence the suppression of your emotions appetite suppression

late bloomer Status: US

idiom

: someone who becomes successful, attractive, etc., at a later time in life than other people She was a late bloomer as a writer.

More 'Stimulus' from President Obama By most accounts, President Obama's $800 billion "stimulus" bill that was passed in February 2009 with the promise of keeping unemployment below 8 percent was an absolute failure. However, last night in a speech to a joint session of Congress, the President demanded that it spend another $450 billion on more of the same "stimulus" that has left America with zero job growth and continued economic stagnation. But don't worry. His top economic adviser Gene Sperling told NBC that this one would likely get us down to 8 percent.

Despite Sperling's predictions, there are a lot of problems with the broad outlines in the President's proposal, not the least of which is the fact that President Obama is insisting Congress immediately pass a bill that doesn't exist. No legislative details have been offered; nothing has been scored by the Congressional Budget Office; there has been no debate or negotiation; and there is no accompanying plan on how to pay for it. President Obama only promised he would talk about paying for it in the weeks to come, and that onus likely will fall on the congressional "super committee" that was supposed to be focused on reducing our debt. "Minor" details such as the lack of an actual bill or money to pay for it aside (or the fact that $450 billion in one year is more than twice as costly as the annual sticker price of Obama's last foray into stimulus spending), there are serious substantive problems with the ideas the President proposed. Last night, Heritage's experts provided their reactions to some of those proposals: Unemployment Benefits: President Obama wants to extend unemployment benefits yet again as a way to boost the economy. That just won't work. Heritage's James Sherk writes, "For welfare reasons Congress wants to help workers who cannot find jobs. This is understandable. That doesnt mean it will help the economy, no matter how much the President wants it to." The stimulus bill extended unemployment benefits, Congress has kept them in place several times since then, and the federal government has spent over $300 billion on unemployment benefits since Obama took office. It hasn't stimulated the economy before. It's not going to stimulate it now. Reviving the Failed Hiring Tax Credit: In order to help businesses create new jobs, the President proposed a tax credit for businesses hiring new workers. The trouble is that he's been there, done that, and it didn't work. Why try it again? Heritage's Curtis Dubay explains the problem with the proposal: "A credit of a few thousand dollars, a mere fraction of the cost of hiring a worker, does nothing to change that calculation. The only positive effect on hiring the credit could have would be on temporary positions if it makes adding a few new temps profitable in the short term. But once the credit expires businesses will let those workers go." Tax Hikes on Job Creators: Taxing those who create jobs as a way to help create jobs is entirely counterintuitive, but the President proposed it anyway. Even though he has agreed that tax hikes slow economic growth and deter job creation, last night he proposed raising taxes on investors, businesses, and entrepreneurs. Dubay says, "This is akin to bailing water intoan already-sinking ship." And with businesses looking for more certainty, continuing to threaten more tax hikes will only dampen America's chances of real recovery.

Infrastructure Banks That Won't Build the Economy:Throwing more money at building roads and bridges, President Obama tells us, will create new jobs. So he is proposing the creation of an infrastructure bank that would require a whole new bureaucracy. Heritage's Patrick Knudsen says that increasing spending on these projects "simply moves resources from one place to another it may employ construction workers, but only by reducing jobs in other sectors." And taxpayers end up paying the price, all without creating net job growth or boosting the economy in the near term. Going the Wrong Way on Education: America's education system needs less federal involvement, not more. But the President used his jobs speech as a way to shoehorn the federal government further into the education business, proposing that Washington spend billions on school construction and new jobs for teachers. Never mind that since 1970, school enrollment in public elementary and secondary schools has increased just 7 percent, while staff hires have increased 83 percent. Heritage's Lindsey Burke explains, "On a per-pupil basis, federal spending on education has nearly tripled since the 1970's." And for all that spending, Washington hasn't improved results. There's more the President proposed, as well, but much more he didn't mention, too. He demagogued his political opponents for favoring smaller government and the "rigid ideas" of what government can and cannot do. He presented one false choice, among many, between reducing government regulations and protecting the American people. He also promised to "root out" unnecessary regulations, as he has for four straight years, while only adding more costly rules to the books. He proposed a puzzling plan to allow refinancing of mortgages without explaining the details or who pays for it. He proposed extending the payroll tax "holiday," which won't create jobs. He ignored serious ways to grow the economy, like pursuing domestic energy production, which he himself has stalled. President Obama has spent two and a half years increasing federal spending, growing government, and punishing businesses with burdensome regulations, and today 14 million Americans remain unemployed. Now the President is demanding more of the same at an even higher price. That is not a plan to create new jobs--that is a politically motivated message that ignores the reality of America's economic crisis.

outbreak plural outbreaks

/ a t bre k/ noun [count]

: a sudden start or increase of fighting or disease a choleraoutbreak often followed by of an outbreak of violence/war They are preparing for an outbreak of the virus.

También podría gustarte