Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
By week's end, though, environmentalists were assailing the Bush How to counter the exponential growth of that human production?
administration anew over its refusal to act on the findings of
Environmental Protection Agency scientists who concluded that Sen. Graham convincingly accentuated the positive Wednesday, telling
climate change presents "grave risks" to human health due to its us that rising gas prices and rising awareness of climate change are
impact on supplies of food, water and energy. That EPA analysis was creating "a magic merging" of previously disparate interests, including
conducted in response to a 2007 Supreme Court ruling requiring it to "the national security constituency, the innovation constituency and the
regulate greenhouse gases unless it could provide a "scientific" basis environmental constituency." He said that "creating alternatives to
for not doing so. fossil fuels is the new economy."
Yet EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson rejected his own agency's Thus, the path to reduced CO2 emissions, if plotted properly, could
report, instead declaring a four-month "public comment" period before also be a path to prosperity. Clearly, we have more than one good
deciding the next step. By the time that delay ends, a new president- reason to reduce our use of fossil fuels.
elect will have been chosen.