Está en la página 1de 27

The White House Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release October 08, 2011

WEEKLY ADDRESS: Growing the Economy with the American Jobs Act
WASHINGTONIn this weeks address, President Obama told the American people that the Senate will vote on the American Jobs Act next week, which independent economists have said will put Americans back to work, grow the economy, and give working people and small businesses a tax break. It is time for those who oppose the jobs act to explain why they are fighting against something that we know will improve the American economy, put teachers in classrooms, cops on the streets, and construction workers back to work rebuilding our roads and bridges. President Obama urged all Americans who support the American Jobs Act to call their Senators and tell them to put a stop to the gridlock in Washington and pass the jobs act next week. Remarks of President Barack Obama Weekly Address The White House Saturday, October 8, 2011 Next week, the Senate will vote on the American Jobs Act. Its a bill that will put more people to work and put more money in the pockets of working Americans. And it will provide our economy with the jolt that it really needs right now This is not the time for the usual games or political gridlock in Washington. The challenges facing financial markets around the world could have very real effects on our own economy at a time when its already fragile. But this jobs bill can help guard against another downturn here in America. This isnt just my belief. This is what independent economists have said. Not just politicians. Not just people in my administration. Independent experts who do this for a living have said that this jobs bill will have a significant effect for our economy and middle-class families all across America. But if we dont act, the opposite will be true there will be fewer jobs and weaker growth. So any Senator out there whos thinking about voting against this jobs bill needs to explain why they would oppose something that we know would improve our economic situation. If the Republicans in Congress think they have a better plan for creating jobs right now, they should

prove it. Because one of the same independent economists who looked at our plan just said that their ideas, quote, wouldnt mean much for the economy in the near term. If their plan doesnt measure up, the American people deserve to know what it is that Republicans in Congress dont like about this jobs plan. You hear a lot of our Republican friends say that one of the most important things we can do is cut taxes. Well, they should love this plan. The American Jobs Act would cut taxes for virtually every worker and small business in America. And if youre a small business owner that hires new workers, raises wages, or hires a veteran, you get an additional tax cut. Right now, hundreds of thousands of teachers and firefighters and police officers have been laid off because of state budget cuts. This jobs bill will put a lot of these men and women back to work. Right now, there are millions of laid-off construction workers who could be repairing our bridges and roads and modernizing our schools. Why wouldnt we want to put these men and women to work rebuilding America? The proposals in this bill are steps we have to take if we want to build an economy that lasts; if we want to be able to compete with other countries for jobs that restore a sense of security for the middle-class. But we also have to rein in our deficit and start living within our means, which is why this jobs bill is paid for by asking millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share. Some see this as class warfare. I see it as a simple choice. We can either keep taxes exactly as they are for millionaires and billionaires, or we can ask them to pay at least the same rate as a plumber or a bus driver. And in the process, we can put teachers and construction workers and veterans back on the job. We can either fight to protect their tax cuts, or we can cut taxes for virtually every worker and small business in America. But we cant afford to do both. Its that simple. There are too many people hurting in this country for us to simply do nothing. The economy is too fragile for us to let politics get in the way of action. The people who represent you in Washington have a responsibility to do whats best for you not whats best for their party or whats going to help them win an election thats more than a year away. So I need you to keep making your voices heard in Washington. I need you to remind these folks who they work for. And I need you to tell your Senators to do the right thing by passing this jobs bill right away. Thank you.

[PRESIDENTIAL WEEKLY ADDRESS ASSESSMENT PHASE A.a START OF]

[ Old English e, earlier se < Indo-European]

[ Old English hs < Germanic]

The White House Office of the Press Secretary


[14th century. Directly or via French < late Latin immediatus "not separated" < Latin mediatus, past participle of mediare (see mediate)]

[14th century. < late Latin secretarius "confidential officer" < secretus (see secret)]

[13th century. Via Old French relaisser "let go" < Latin relaxare "loosen" (see relax)]

For Immediate Release October 08, 2011


[14th century. Via Old French adresser < assumed Vulgar Latin addrictiare "direct to" < Latin directus (see direct)]

[ Old English wice < Germanic, "series, succession"]

WEEKLY ADDRESS: Growing the Economy with the American Jobs Act
[Early 16th century. < Americus, Latinized form of Amerigo Vespucci (1454-1512), Italian navigator] [15th century. Directly or via French < Latin oeconomia < Greek oikonomia < oikonomos "steward of a household" < oikos "house" + nemein "manage"]

< 5th Century Before the Personalitys Coming known as Christ Xenophon used the same name for one of his studies.

[14th century. Via French < Latin praesident- < present participle of praesidere (see preside)]

[ Old English tellan < Germanic, "put in order"]

WASHINGTONIn this weeks address, President Obama told the American people that the Senate will vote on the American Jobs Act next week, which independent economists have said will put Americans back to work, grow the economy, and give working people and small businesses a tax break.
[ Old English bisignis "anxiety, distress" < bisig "anxious, busy"] [ Old English weorc < Indo-European]

[Early 16th century. < Latin explanare "flatten out, unfold" < planus "flat, clear"]

[14th century. < French opposer, an alteration (influenced by poser "place") of Latin opponere (see opponent)]

It is time for those who oppose the jobs act to explain why they are fighting against something that we know will improve the American economy, put teachers in classrooms, cops on the streets, and construction workers back to work rebuilding our roads and bridges.
[ Old English eall < Germanic]

President Obama urged all Americans who support the American Jobs Act to call their Senators and tell them to put a stop to the gridlock in Washington and pass the jobs act next week.

[Assumed Old English putian, origin ?]

[13th century. < French passer < Latin passus "step"]

[Late 16th century. < French remarquer < marquer "to mark"]

[Early 17th century. Via French < Latin praesidere "sit in front of" < sedere "sit"]

Remarks of President Barack Obama Weekly Address The White House Saturday, October 8, 2011

senate [snnt] (plural senates) noun


1. legislative body: the sole or upper law-making chamber of government in many countries or states, past or present 2. U.S. state legislature: the higher of two elected legislative bodies in many states of the United States 3. ancient Roman assembly: the highest council of the ancient Roman Republic and of the Roman Empire 4. senate building: the building where a senate meets 5. university body: the main faculty governing body in some universities and colleges

[12th century. Via French < Latin senatus "assembly of elders" < senex "male elder"]

Next week, the Senate will vote on the American Jobs Act. Its a bill that will put more people to work and put more money in the pockets of working Americans.
[13th century. Via Old French moneie < Latin moneta "mint, money" < Moneta, epithet of the goddess Juno, in whose temple coins were minted]

[15th century. < Latin providere "prepare in advance, supply," literally "see ahead" < videre "see"]

And it will provide our economy with the jolt that it really needs right now
[Late 16th century. Origin ?] [15th century. Directly or via French < late Latin realis "relating to things (in law)" < Latin res "thing, fact"]

[ Old English tma "period of time" < Germanic, "extend"]

[ Old English gamen < Germanic, "people participating together"]

This is not the time for the usual games or political gridlock in Washington. The challenges facing financial markets around the world could have very real effects on our own economy at a time when its already fragile.
[15th century. Directly or via French < Latin fragilis < source of frangere "break"] [14th century. Directly or via French < Latin effectus < efficere "accomplish" < facere "make, do"]

[Mid-16th century. Origin ?]

But this jobs bill can help guard against another downturn here in America.
another [ r] adjective, pronoun
1. one more: an additional need another person to help May I have another? 2. one that is different: somebody or something that is separate or different We need another accountant because ours is moving. This one is too dark; I would prefer another. 3. some other: some other one, or any other one at one time or another

[15th century. < French garde (noun), garder (verb) < Germanic]

another [ r] adjective, pronoun


1. one more: an additional need another person to help May I have another? 2. one that is different: somebody or something that is separate or different We need another accountant because ours is moving. This one is too dark; I would prefer another. 3. some other: some other one, or any other one at one time or another

1. somebody or something unaffected by others: somebody or something that is free from control, dependence, or interference 2. POLITICS somebody politically unaffiliated: a politician or voter who is not a member, representative, or supporter of any political party

This isnt just my belief. This is what independent economists have said. Not just politicians. Not just people in my administration. Independent experts who do this for a living
[14th century. Via French < Latin expert-, past participle of experiri "try out"]

[ Old English secgan < Germanic]

[Late 16th century. < Latin significant-, present participle of significare (see signify)]

have said that this jobs bill will have a significant effect for our economy and middle-class families all across America. But if we dont act, the opposite will be true there will be fewer jobs and weaker growth.
[ Old English grwan < Indo-European] [14th century. Directly or via French acte < Latin actus, actum "public transaction" < past participle of agere "do"]

[ Old English encan < Indo-European]

So any Senator out there whos thinking about voting against this jobs bill needs to explain why they would oppose something that we know would improve our economic situation.
something pronoun
[smthing]

1. unspecified thing: an unspecified or unidentified object, phenomenon, action, utterance, or feeling Don't just stand there; do something! I had a feeling that there was something wrong. Would you like something to eat? 2. unspecified amount: an unspecified and approximate amount expressed in relation to a specific number or quantity something over 50 something between 20 and 30 percent 3. suggesting resemblance: used to suggest that one thing or person resembles another to an extent or has some of the qualities of the other There's definitely something of the knight errant about him. 4. rather: used to qualify a description of a thing or event and tone it down or make it sound more guarded It was something of a disappointment. 5. impressive person or thing: an impressive or important person or thing He's really something!

[Early 16th century. < Anglo-Norman emprower "make a profit" < Old French prou "profit" < late Latin prode "profitable" < Latin prodesse (see proud)]

adverb
1. somewhat: slightly or to some degree

[ Old English gd < Germanic, "unite"]

United As Good in the name of God which we Worship as an indispensable part of US.

[15th century. < Latin congressus, past participle of congredi "go together" < gradi "proceed"]

If the Republicans in Congress think they have a better plan for creating jobs right now, they should prove it. Because one of the same independent economists who looked at our plan just said that their ideas, quote, wouldnt mean much for the economy in the near term.
[14th century. Via Latin < Greek, "look" < idein "to see"] < Original Meaning Form , Standing

[Late 17th century. < French, "ground plan," alteration (after plan "flat") of plant < Latin plantare (see plant)] < Latin planus = Smooth , Flat

If their plan doesnt measure up, the American people deserve to know what it is that Republicans in Congress dont like about this jobs plan.
[ Old English hlot "object used to make decisions by chance, portion, destiny" < Germanic] [12th century. < Old Norse lkr, shortening of glkr, equivalent to Old English gelc (see alike)]

You hear a lot of our Republican friends say that one of the most important things we can do is cut taxes. Well, they should love this plan. The American Jobs Act would cut taxes for virtually every worker and small business in America.
[ Old English sml "slender, small" < Germanic, "small animal"]

[ Old English gen "your own," past participle of gan (see owe)] Greek Hellenic = lead , Latin ago = ride , do

And if youre a small business owner that hires new workers, raises wages, or hires a veteran, you get an additional tax cut.

[14th century. < Latin addere < dare "give"]

[ Old English nu < Indo-European]

Right now, hundreds of thousands of teachers and firefighters and police officers have been laid off because of state budget cuts.
[14th century. Via Anglo-Norman bille < medieval Latin bulla "seal on a document"]

This jobs bill will put a lot of these men and women back to work.
[ Old English man(n) < IndoEuropean, "person, man"] [ Old English wimman, variant of wfman, < wf "woman, wife" + man "person"] Girlfriend, Wife = My Woman, My Female Persona

m3

Right now, there are millions of laid-off construction workers who could be repairing our bridges and roads and modernizing our schools. Why wouldnt we want to put these men and women to work rebuilding America?
[12th century. < Old Norse vanta "be lacking" < Germanic, "lacking"] You want what you miss cause of bad luck

proposal [pr pz'l] (plural proposals) noun


1. suggested idea or plan: a suggestion or intention, especially one put forward formally or officially 2. act of proposing: the act of making a suggestion or stating an intention 3. request to marry somebody: a request for somebody to enter into marriage

The proposals in this bill are stepsMicrosoft Encarta 2009. 1993-2008 that lasts; if we have to take if we want to build an economy we want to be able to compete with other countries for jobs that restore a sense of security for Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. the middle-class.
[Early 17th century. < late Latin competere "strive together" < Latin petere "seek"]

[ Old English middel]

have [stressed, hav unstressed, hv, v] (past and past participle had [stressed, had unstressed, hd, d], present participle having, 3rd person present singular has [stressed, haz unstressed, hz, z]) CORE MEANING: a verb indicating that somebody possesses something, either materially or as a characteristic or attribute She has a small cottage in the country. He has beautiful eyes.
1. transitive verb own something: to be the owner or possessor of something I don't have a lot of money. 2. transitive verb possess characteristic: to be the possessor of a quality or characteristic She had long blond hair. 3. auxiliary verb forms perfect tenses: used to form the following tenses or aspects: the present perfect, the past perfect, the future perfect, and the continuous forms of these (used before the past participle of a verb or at the beginning of a question, or with "got" to indicate possession) I have finished my dinner, thank you. Have you finished yet? I have got a new car. 4. modal verb expresses compulsion: expresses compulsion, obligation, or necessity

Peter you are my Rocking Stone My Main Seeker Since Then, Peter all needed he was to hear his names tune to know what Gods Vision Was before and after his Son Ascended to the Heavens

[ Old English lf < Germanic]

[ Old English hw, instrumental case form of hwt "what"]

But we also have to rein in our deficit and start living within our means, which is why this jobs We havebill is paid for by asking millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share. to go now.
said he'd do it if he had to

5. modal[13th verb

century. < assumed Old

expresses certainty: expresses conviction or certainty English cytan] There just has to be a solution to the problem. 6. transitive verb receive something: to receive or obtain something I had a Christmas card from him. 7. transitive verb eat something: to eat or drink something We have breakfast at eight.

[ Old English scearu "division, portion" < IndoEuropean, "to cut"]

Some see this as class warfare.


[13th century. < Old French chois < choisir "choose" < Germanic] warfare noun
[wwr fr] 1. waging of war: the act or fact of engaging in a war 2. conflict: conflict or struggle economic warfare

I see it as a simple choice. We can either keep taxes exactly as they are for millionaires and billionaires, or we can ask them to pay at least the same rate as a plumber or a bus driver.
[ Old English cunnan < IndoEuropean] can or may? Many people draw a distinction between can, meaning "be able to," and may, meaning "be allowed to," but the distinction is hard to maintain in practice and the meanings often overlap. In everyday conversation, Can I go? is as likely to be used as May I go?, and the context, together with intonation, usually makes it clear what is meant. In more formal situations it is wise to maintain the distinction, if only because many people expect it. Note that may has ambiguities of its own. He may go can mean either "he is allowed to go" or "it is possible that he will go"; again, intonation and context clarify the matter. The negative contraction mayn't is awkward, and can't is usually used instead: Can't we come too? Microsoft Encarta 2009. 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

[12th century. Via Old French payer "pacify" < Latin pacare < pax "peace"]

[ Old English tcan < Indo-European, "to show"]

[15th century. < Latin construct-, past participle of construere "pile together" < struere "pile, build"]
[Early 16th century. Directly or via French vtran < Latin veteranus < vetus "old"] A U.S. Marine with 5 year old Experience on a Battlefield. A Taliban who knows chopping heads since the age of 5. Who is a more advanced warrior? Whos Nature is self healed? Whos Rising? Whos Falling? Whos Needing the Needy? Who needs only himself when the True Hour of War Comes?

And in the process, we can put teachers and construction workers and veterans back on the job. We can either fight to protect their tax cuts, or we can cut taxes for virtually every worker and small business in America. But we cant afford to do both. Its that simple.
[15th century. < Latin protect-, past participle of protegere "cover in front" < tegere "to cover"] [Pre-12th century. Via French < Latin simplus]

[ Old English < Indo-European, "forward"]

[ Old English manig < Indo-European, "many, often"]

There are too many people hurting in this country for us to simply do nothing. The economy is too fragile for us to let politics get in the way of action.
[14th century. Directly or via French < Latin repraesentare, literally "show back" < praesentare "to show"] [15th century. Via French and Latin < Greek politikos "civic, political" < polits "citizen" < polis "city"] Polis > = Fortress , Stronghold , Castle

The people who represent you in Washington have a responsibility to do whats best for you not whats best for their party or whats going to help them win an election thats more than a year away.
[ Old English aweg < on weg "on (your) way"] Away from your Way could mean coming to you or moving from you, but it is always in relation to you.

[ Old English cnedan < W Germanic]

So I need you to keep making your voices heard in Washington. I need you to remind these folks who they work for. And I need you to tell your Senators to do the right thing by passing this jobs bill right away. Thank you.
[ Old English ancian < Indo-European] [ Old English riht < Indo-European, "go straight"]

[PRESIDENTIAL WEEKLY ADDRESS ASSESSMENT PHASE A.a END OF]

[PRESIDENTIAL WEEKLY ADDRESS ASSESSMENT PHASE A.b START OF]


Shadow Warrior I am a Feather in the Bald Eagle's Wings

Shadow Warrior If you could fly over what i've seen

Shadow Warrior

The White House

Your Beat Is My Drum And My Song Is Your Dance

Far is never Far Near is Never Near

Shadow Warrior A Pleasing moment can last forever or not more than a year lust

Shadow Warrior If I could see you Dance what I Sing

I know You Are Flying with Me. I know You Are Flying With Me... You Are Dancing With Me... You are Free...

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release October 08, 2011

WEEKLY ADDRESS: Growing the Economy with the American Jobs Act

WASHINGTONIn this weeks address, President Obama told the American people that the Senate will vote on the American Jobs Act next week, which independent economists have said will put Americans back to work, grow the economy, and give working people and small

businesses a tax break.

It is time for those who oppose the jobs act to explain why they are fighting against something that we know will improve the American economy, put teachers in classrooms, cops on the
I'm done searching, fucking re uploading whores, I will way a few months for the blue ray, fuck all you re uploaders PirateBay Frustated Member

streets, and construction workers back to work rebuilding our roads and bridges. President Obama urged all Americans who support the American Jobs Act to call their Senators and tell them to put a stop to the gridlock in Washington and pass the jobs act next week.

Remarks of President Barack Obama Weekly Address The White House Saturday, October 8, 2011

Next week, the Senate will vote on the American Jobs Act. Its a bill that will put more people to work and put more money in the pockets of working Americans. And it will provide our economy with the jolt that it really needs right now

This is not the time for the usual games or political gridlock in Washington. The challenges facing financial markets around the world could have very real effects on our own economy at a time when its already fragile. But this jobs bill can help guard against another downturn here in America.

This isnt just my belief. This is what independent economists have said. Not just politicians. Not just people in my administration. Independent experts who do this for a living have said that this jobs bill will have a significant effect for our economy and middle-class families all across America. But if we dont act, the opposite will be true there will be fewer jobs and weaker growth.

So any Senator out there whos thinking about voting against this jobs bill needs to explain why they would oppose something that we know would improve our economic situation. If the Republicans in Congress think they have a better plan for creating jobs right now, they should prove it. Because one of the same independent economists who looked at our plan just said that their ideas, quote, wouldnt mean much for the economy in the near term.

If their plan doesnt measure up, the American people deserve to know what it is that Republicans in Congress dont like about this jobs plan. You hear a lot of our Republican friends say that one of the most important things we can do is cut taxes. Well, they should love this plan. The American Jobs Act would cut taxes for virtually every worker and small business in America. And if youre a small business owner that hires new workers, raises wages, or hires a veteran, you get an additional tax cut.

Right now, hundreds of thousands of teachers and firefighters and police officers have been laid off because of state budget cuts. This jobs bill will put a lot of these men and women back to work. Right now, there are millions of laid-off construction workers who could be repairing our bridges and roads and modernizing our schools. Why wouldnt we want to put these men and women to work rebuilding America?

Remake the wills wheel? A New One or an Old needing Restoration?

Offer to the Mind Willing to Accept.

The proposals in this bill are steps we have to take if we want to build an economy that lasts; if we want to be able to compete with other countries for jobs that restore a sense of security for the middle-class. But we also have to rein in our deficit and start living within our means, which is why this jobs bill is paid for by asking millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share.

Why This is Happening to Me? Is Reality for me or against me? Am I Part of it or not? Why Yes , Why No? Why Both Yes and No? Why WoW? WoW Why Not?

A Rank of Teachers willing to become Students2BecomeTeachers Again.

Through the Suffering of Understanding I Teach but is it what Knowledge should be all about? If Life is already full of Pain why do I need you for?

Some see this as class warfare. I see it as a simple choice. We can either keep taxes exactly as they are for millionaires and billionaires, or we can ask them to pay at least the same rate as a plumber or a bus driver. And in the process, we can put teachers and construction workers and veterans back on the job. We can either fight to protect their tax cuts, or we can cut taxes for virtually every worker and small business in America. But we cant afford to do both. Its that simple.

There are too many people hurting in this country for us to simply do nothing. The economy is too fragile for us to let politics get in the way of action. The people who represent you in Washington have a responsibility to do whats best for you not whats best for their party or whats going to help them win an election thats more than a year away. So I need you to keep making your voices heard in Washington. I need you to remind these folks who they work for. And I need you to tell your Senators to do the right thing by passing this jobs bill right away. Thank you.

[PRESIDENTIAL WEEKLY ADDRESS ASSESSMENT PHASE A.b END OF]

[PRESIDENTIAL WEEKLY ADDRESS ASSESSMENT PHASE A.c START OF]

The White House Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release October 08, 2011

WEEKLY ADDRESS: Growing the Economy with the American Jobs Act

To Tell is to Throw Missiles (Messages) that serve the utter purpose of shutting up the opponent as soon and as permanently as possible. Related to a Debate. Implies Political Tensions or Upcoming Elections.

WASHINGTONIn this weeks address, President Obama told the American people that the Senate will vote on the American Jobs Act next week, which independent economists have said will put Americans back to work, grow the economy, and give working people and small businesses a tax break. It is time for those who oppose the jobs act to explain why they are fighting against something that we know will improve the American economy, put teachers in classrooms, cops on the streets, and construction workers back to work rebuilding our roads and bridges. President Obama urged all Americans who support the American Jobs Act to call their Senators and tell them to put a stop to the gridlock in Washington and pass the jobs act next week.

Remarks of President Barack Obama Weekly Address The White House Saturday, October 8, 2011

Next week, the Senate will vote on the American Jobs Act. Its a bill that will put more people to work and put more money in the pockets of working Americans. And it will provide our economy with the jolt that it really needs right now

This is not the time for the usual games or political gridlock in Washington. The challenges facing financial markets around the world could have very real effects on our own economy at a time when its already fragile. But this jobs bill can help guard against another downturn here in America.

Where is the Whole of Greece? Where America Starts and Begins? Where is the Whole Entity of Man if not Everywhere as he / she thinks? For if To Read is to Think, then To ReWrite A Fact is to make Real History.

This isnt just my belief. This is what independent economists have said. Not just politicians. Not just people in my administration. Independent experts who do this for a living have said that this jobs bill will have a significant effect for our economy and middle-class families all across America. But if we dont act, the opposite will be true there will be fewer jobs and weaker growth.

So any Senator out there whos thinking about voting against this jobs bill needs to explain why they would oppose something that we know would improve our economic situation. If the Republicans in Congress think they have a better plan for creating jobs right now, they should prove it. Because one of the same independent economists who looked at our plan just said that their ideas, quote, wouldnt mean much for the economy in the near term.

If their plan doesnt measure up, the American people deserve to know what it is that Republicans in Congress dont like about this jobs plan. You hear a lot of our Republican friends say that one of the most important things we can do is cut taxes. Well, they should love this plan. The American Jobs Act would cut taxes for virtually every worker and small business in America. And if youre a small business owner that hires new workers, raises wages, or hires a veteran, you get an additional tax cut.

Right now, hundreds of thousands of teachers and firefighters and police officers have been laid off because of state budget cuts. This jobs bill will put a lot of these men and women back to work. Right now, there are millions of laid-off construction workers who could be repairing our bridges and roads and modernizing our schools. Why wouldnt we want to put these men and women to work rebuilding America?

The proposals in this bill are steps we have to take if we want to build an economy that lasts; if we want to be able to compete with other countries for jobs that restore a sense of security for the middle-class. But we also have to rein in our deficit and start living within our means, which is why this jobs bill is paid for by asking millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share.

Some see this as class warfare. I see it as a simple choice. We can either keep taxes exactly as they are for millionaires and billionaires, or we can ask them to pay at least the same rate as a

plumber or a bus driver. And in the process, we can put teachers and construction workers and veterans back on the job. We can either fight to protect their tax cuts, or we can cut taxes for virtually every worker and small business in America. But we cant afford to do both. Its that simple.

There are too many people hurting in this country for us to simply do nothing. The economy is too fragile for us to let politics get in the way of action. The people who represent you in Washington have a responsibility to do whats best for you not whats best for their party or whats going to help them win an election thats more than a year away. So I need you to keep making your voices heard in Washington. I need you to remind these folks who they work for. And I need you to tell your Senators to do the right thing by passing this jobs bill right away. Thank you.

[PRESIDENTIAL WEEKLY ADDRESS ASSESSMENT PHASE A.c END OF]

También podría gustarte