The person in charge of the OSHMS carries out the measurement of the following

indicators: Frequency of work accidents, severity of work accidents and absenteeism. It

considers that since it has no occupational illnesses or fatal accidents, it does not measure
them and does not consider them as indicators to be taken into account. According to the
scenario, the position of the person in charge of the OSH-SMS

a. a. Correct because it is not necessary to measure them

b. b. Incorrect because these are part of the minimum indicators of the OSHMS and
records must be kept.

In the review of the OSHMS, it has been identified that the company has structure, process and
result indicators for each of the elements proposed as necessary for the construction of these,
each indicator has a file, however, it is not evident that the indicators are measured or reviewed.
Considering the case, the company:

a. Meets the requirement

b. Does not meet the requirement

Your company's new OSHMS Manager has identified that as of December 31, 2017, the initial
assessment under the minimum standards of Resolution 0312 of 2019 has not been carried out
and an improvement plan has not been developed. Taking into account the phases of transition
and adequacy of the Minimum Standards of the OSHMS, raised in Article 25 of Resolution 0312 of
2019, the company is:

a. Complying with the phases

b. Failure to comply with the phases

In the company where you work, an occupational accident occurs that generates a day of
disability, in accordance with Article 30 of Resolution 0312 of 2017, should this be considered in
the minimum indicators of the OSHMS?

a. Yes

b. No

The OSHMS work plan defines the system's activities; however, they are not focused on meeting
the OSH objectives, and the resources allocated in the budget are not aligned with the work plan.
Taking into account the case and the provisions of Article 2.2.4.6.8 of Decree 1072 of 2015, what
would you recommend to the company:

a. Maintain the work plan they have defined

b. Adjust the work plan taking into account the OSH objectives that have been defined.

c. Adjust the work plan including the necessary resources for the execution of the activities that
will allow it to achieve the defined OSH objectives.

d. b and c
In the company where he works, the Occupational Health and Safety Management System has
been planned taking into account the results of the initial assessment and other important
elements such as priority risks and accident, occupational illness and absenteeism statistics. What
makes it possible to define the planning taking into account the elements raised?

a. Management priorities and resources

b. Annual work plan, objectives

c. Indicators

d. All of the above

In an audit carried out at the company where you work, the following aspects have been
evidenced in the identification of hazards, evaluation and risk assessment: - There are defined
measures for the prevention and control of priority risks, which have not been executed by those
responsible. Upon validation with those responsible for the areas where the finding was identified,
they stated that they were not aware of the measures proposed because they have never
participated in the exercise of hazard identification, evaluation and risk assessment, and they also
consider that the OSH area is responsible for carrying out all these activities. - The activities
performed by contractors and those performed outside the company are not being considered -
The last review was carried out 18 months ago - The prevention and control measures are not
established in accordance with the hierarchy of controls Taking into account the case, to which
numeral would focus the nonconformity:

a. Article 2.2.2.4.6.15 of Decree 1072 of 2015

b. Article 2.2.2.4.6.8 of Decree 1072 of 2015

c. Article 2.2.4.6.23 of Decree 1072 of 2015.

d. Article 18 of Resolution 1111 of 2017

In a courier company, an annual training plan has been developed, in which topics such as safety
inspections, accident reporting and investigation, postural hygiene, hand care, assertive
communication and hearing conservation have been included for all the company's employees. If
within the identification of hazards, evaluation and assessment of risks, the traffic risk is prioritized
due to the high exposure of workers to it and because it has already been expressed in several
accidents, what would you recommend to the company?

a. To maintain the issues raised

b. Eliminate all other topics and only include topics related to traffic risk.

c. Conduct a review of the plan, classify the topics according to the target audience and include
topics related to traffic risk prevention.

d. Include traffic risk in the topics

In your company it has been determined that all OSHMS documentation will be kept electronically
for 20 years guaranteeing the preservation of the information and the person in charge of the
OSHMS will have access to all the documents and records of the system, except for the
occupational medical records of the workers since he does not meet the profile of a physician
specializing in Occupational Safety and Health. Considers that the decision is

a. Adequate

b. Inadequate

In the company where he works, he is responsible for the SG-SST and for the planning exercise of
the SG-SST he has collected information related to accident statistics for the last two years,
occupational diseases over the course of time since the creation of the company, statistics of
absenteeism of common and occupational origin, finding the following: - Accident statistics:
accidents related to handling loads and prolonged postures (back, hand, and upper limb injuries)
predominate, followed by accidents related to exposure to chemicals (eye and skin injuries) and a
courier traffic accident classified as serious. - Occupational disease statistics: two occupational
diseases have been qualified (Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Bursitis of the hand) both related to
ergonomic agents, according to Decree 1477 of 2014 - Absenteeism statistics of common and
occupational origin: predominantly incapacities due to lumbar injuries and respiratory infections -
Result of the initial assessment under minimum standards: it is found, according to the criteria of
the minimum standards of the OSH-SMS at 28% (CRITICAL) Taking into account the scenario, it
would establish OSH objectives mainly focused on:

a. Ergonomic risk intervention

b. Chemical Risk Intervention

c. Public risk intervention

d. None of the above

During the application of the initial evaluation under the minimum standards of the OSHMS, the
OSHMS Manager has identified that the Joint Committee for Safety and Health at Work, carries
out monthly meetings and has the minutes of each of them, the attendance is not very consistent
and is not accompanying the safety inspections, nor participating in the investigations of accidents
at work, how would you rate the evaluation criteria taking into account the findings according to
the criteria of the minimum standards of the OSHMS?How would you qualify the evaluation
criteria taking into account the findings according to the criteria of the minimum standards of the
OSHMS, taking into account Article 27 of Resolution 0312 of 2019?

a. Complies

b. Partially complies

c. Does not comply

d. None of the above

In an activity planned by the company's maintenance area, a contractor company has been hired
without previously informing the OSH area and without being clear about the safety requirements
to be met. During the execution of the contract, one of the contractor's workers suffers an
occupational accident, which is not reported to the contracting company and is not considered in
the accident frequency and severity indicators. Considering the above, is there a non-compliance
in accordance with Article 30 of Resolution 0312 of 2019?

a. True

b. False

After evaluating the company's OSH Policy in accordance with articles 2.2.4.6.5 and 2.2.4.6.6, it
was found that it has the following elements: - Commitment to OSH, with the identification of
hazards, evaluation and assessment of risks and the establishment of controls and with the
promotion and prevention of workers' health through the continuous improvement of the
OSHMS.Signature of the person responsible for the OSHMS and the date of elaboration or revision
of the policy - It is documented and communicated to the COPASST Taking into account the
scenario, this policy should:

a. Be adjusted including a commitment to comply with legal requirements and the signature of the
legal representative.

b. Maintain as is

c. Be adjusted including communication to all interested parties and posting in visible locations

d. a and c are correct

In the company where you work, mailboxes have been installed as an internal communication
mechanism to receive workers' concerns, ideas and contributions regarding OSH. Taking into
account Article 2.2.2.4.6.14 of Decree 1072 of 2015, the company shall ensure that:

a. Receive and document communications in the mailbox.

b. Receive and file as evidence the communications found in the mailbox.

c. Receive, document and respond to all communications in the mailbox.

d. None of the above

At the last COPASST meeting, one of the members of the group asked the person in charge of the
OSHMS about the results of the last lighting measurement that had been carried out in the
company, as he considered it important to know the results of these measurements and to issue
recommendations in this regard. The OSHMS Manager considered that the communication of the
results to COPASST is not relevant. Taking into account the case and the provisions of Article
2.2.4.6.15 of Decree 1072 of 2015, considers that the position of the Responsible of the OSHMS is:

a. In accordance with the requirement

b. Not in accordance with the requirement

In a company with 75 workers that is classified as Risk IV, the top management has designated
physical, human and financial resources for the implementation, maintenance and improvement
of the OSHMS. Within human resources, it has determined that the person in charge of the
OSHMS will be the Human Management leader, although he/she does not have the profile defined
in Article 17 of Resolution 0312 of 2019. Considering the case, he considers that the decision taken
is:

a. In accordance with the requirement

b. Not in accordance with the requirement

In reviewing the OSHMS, it has been identified that the company has structure, process and result
indicators for each of the elements proposed as necessary for the construction of these, each
indicator has a file, however, there is no evidence that the indicators are measured or reviewed.
Considering the case, the company:

a. Meets the requirement

b. Does not meet the requirement