Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Comparative Table Adam Smith and David Ricardo
Comparative Table Adam Smith and David Ricardo
Smith points out that labor is the real measure of the Ricardo specifies that the two sources of price
value of all goods (he uses corn as a reference to variation are scarcity and the quantity of labor
estimate the value of labor). The value of labor does employed. He concludes that, although there are
not change, although the prices of goods do. goods that cannot be produced using labor, these are
exceptions, while the vast majority are governed by
Smith understands profit as that part of the value the quantity of labor.
If for the mercantilists wealth came from the The natural wage theory was based on the idea that
accumulation of precious metals and for the wages always tended to settle at a subsistence
physiocrats from nature (land), Smith points out that minimum using the distinction between natural price
true wealth is found in work, in the activity of human and market price.
beings.
The natural price depended on the price the worker
In addition, Smith argues that the state should refrain had to pay for subsistence (the cost of living). The
Economic from intervening in the economy because it would be market price was the remuneration that the worker
useless and harmful to the economy. received for his work, determined by the conditions of
Liberalism The economic order would be generated by itself, by supply and demand.
the free play of supply and demand. For, if men acted
freely in the pursuit of their own self-interest, there The rent theory was conceived by Ricardo as the
was an "invisible hand" that turned their efforts into consequence of the scarcity of land produced by
benefits for all. population growth, which forced the cultivation of
lower quality land that in the long run offered a much
lower productivity compared to good land.
Comment
Adam Smith and David Ricardo were two giants of the classical school whose contributions contributed to unquestionable advances in later
times. Thus, Smith was the first economist to point out that profit is generated in the production process, that economic growth depends
fundamentally on the productive utilization of the profits obtained, etc.
However, there were also criticisms of his work, for example, in David Ricardo's model where he refers to two countries, two goods and labor as
the only factor of production (where production functions are homogeneous) and does not take into consideration other factors such as
transportation and trade barriers.In short, the fundamental criticism of the theory is that its assumptions are unrealistic. But that does not rule
out the fact that Smith and Ricardo's models were of paramount importance and the basis for economists years later to contrast what they
had proposed, but with more real facts.