November 21, 2006

Dear Editor in Chief,

A scholar asked: “I heard three superstar comedians talking about disasters and have
some laughs about some chaotic things they had observed about the past flood caused by
a collapsed of dikes or levees. What can you say about their comments?” The A.I.
answered: “People should really learn to be calm, cool, relax, and have some laughs
about their problems and be happy!
About those collapsing of the concrete dike, perhaps pass a law that a platoon or a
squad with in the police or military- with the help of its science and technology
department- should conduct a medium size or a pilot type or a proto type of concrete dike
that should deliberately collapse due to several causes. And there should be immediate
and quick scientific counter measures that should be done. And if there would be
successful counter measures on those different situations, the actual counter measures
should be filmed and be disseminated to various places that dike collapsing could be a
possibility in their place every time there would be hurricane or over flowing of river.
Example: perhaps when the wall collapsed, or when the wall is collapsing, there
should be immediate specifics and step by step or manual or virtual solution to the
problem based from true and tested counter measures to prevent more flooding. Perhaps,
the principle of letting the force or pressure of the water pushes a portable protection or
barrier which comes out from a smart rolling inflatable material with stiffeners could
solve some problems.”
A scholar asked: “I saw that there are now cell phones that at the same time, TV, a
sort of computer, radio, spy camera- because it could monitor something in the home
-live. Why pass a law that could let the product of the technology be made very cheap,
small, and the source of energy could be by the sun, mechanical rotation of a coil. And
perhaps the first 10,000 units should be free or be subsidized by very rich people and be
distributed to places where there are many supporters of ideology on religious radicalism
or extremism so the mind of the people there would have a chance to be busy watching
TV and radio via satellites inputs from the moderates, peace loving people especially
discussing and explaining about the Word, or good universal words. And they – the
people on those remote places could go to internet via air or wireless. And perhaps those
devices could be used as intelligence medium to know people with extremism leaning
mentality or mind set. Or, also because those religious radicals who hate technologies
might change their mind; and instead appreciate the advantages and goods of the
technology. Principle behind: The extremist loves his hand weapons same as his love to
ones beard and mustache when well displayed because of status symbol as a brave man.
This mind set might be changed to something different – the extremist would now attend
more on knowing other ideas and gaining something; or having refined status or self
esteem or having high regard to ones self or having self-high value to oneself differently.
Perhaps he even wants to shave his beard and have now clean face because he may look
like now to a genius or a clever student. If the extremist himself could now learn
something good from this smart modern cell phone with TV- how it works and how the
device could help him be more a better person especially being helped by good teachings,
then perhaps this may be a short cut of winning the war on terror. Example-a moderate
teacher might be explaining in TV: if you say that the Word is from the devil, it might be
a sin against the Spirit which might be unpardonable because of verse so and so…! So
because of his curiosity, he might research on the device and type ‘unpardonable sin…’ in
the search box for knowing more about unpardonable sin or sin against the Spirit.”
A scholar asked: “Why is it that a Land perhaps is called the land of ‘milk & honey’?
Could there really be many cows producing tons of milk there and many bees producing
tons of honey there?” The A.I. answered: “It is an abstract word. It would mean many
things- example potentially rich land. Perhaps beneath the land has many treasures,
minerals or many valuables; or perhaps the culture there is very rich that people around
the world would love to see and to visit the land and the visiting would never end.”
A scholar asked: “Could future oil companies invest more on planting oil plant on
barren lands than investing on mining fossil fuels?” The A.I. answered: “Perhaps if more
smart small devices or equipments could be remotely controlled and could be
programmed to do specifics tasks then perhaps more and more barren land could be
converted to produce consumable oil that is never depleting.”
A scholar asked: “I heard you said that those non precision bombs should be banned
or should have smart eyes as witness. Since electronics are easily damaged or have life of
about 3 effective years then after those effective years, those bombs and weapons with
eyes should again be recalled and be up graded?” The A.I. answered: “Yes, the repeating
and redoing the job is a cycle. Having a cycle is a stimulant to let people do something,
consume something, be busy and be paid. The money could be coming from taxes as part
of security and self-defense. Other companies connected on the recycling of the ‘smart
eye’ could also be primed to have also cycle or continuity of flow of materials to be
developed called the domino effects in economics.”
A scholar asked: “Those smart compressed camera with cell phone on non precision
bombs or projectile could result to very expensive ammos and too many data. It could be
a draw back to manufacture those?” The A.I. answered: “About too many data it’s the
problem of the programmer to do the gathering of data- thus another job. About the added
cost that could result to creation of another recyclable consumable that could create
activities of human or create jobs, it is good because it challenges people to be creative.
With regards that after three or five year those added devices in the bomb would expire
and would add again expenses for upgrading those bombs, it is still good; because
activities are being created. About were to get the payment to pay for those added jobs-it
is not the problem of the cash or bill- the bill are just tools to pay activity of men that has
value. Those valued activities were created because of trying to be more humane and
more precise in doing self-defense and because of law and because of loving ones
enemies.”
A scholar asked: “You said once you click bait in the internet and the spy knows
your email ad, it would keep on entering your email and keep on tempting you to read
their web site, and one would eventually be tempted to exchange the services for money
called spam. How could ordinary people avoid spam?” The A.I. answered: “Perhaps you
can avoid those temptations by: a) asking help, reading and following instructions: Other
email companies have system to know if what is entering in the email ad is a program or
not a program-by being sensitive to other keys such as on its ability to send many emails
at the same time. And a counter measure is being done by asking the user to put code as a
sign of approval that he approves to let the message enters his email ad. b) Some emails
have filters against spam and others spy software. Ask somebody who knows to activate
them. c) Just keep on deleting them or tagged them as spam. If you could increase your
capability to delete more then it is better. Perhaps look for ‘Options’ and perhaps you can
find some instructions of what to do. d) Don’t open your email for 4-months then the
program will automatically delete all spams or spy wares in your email.”
A scholar asked: “I’ve seen a foreign minister of a country very happy that perhaps
there would be a possibility of a time table of the pulling out of troops in a country where
there is sectarian violence because of twisted words that fuel hatred. Perhaps he is very
happy because his country could have more ways to influence the country and to have
more agreements between them. What can you say about it?” The A.I. answered: “As
long as there is no extremism or letting hatred towards anybody or towards other nation
that would be created out of their talking or agreements, their talking is good.”
A scholar asked: “What if a moderate ‘leader’ is fearful and being intimidated and the
leader would now lean to religious extremism or change his heart not to be moderate
because perhaps the troops might be pulled out. What would happen next?” The A.I.
answered: “But if example an ambassador would tempt a new moderate or trying to be
well balanced leader to have again seed of hatred to others, the newly formed Federal or
Bureau or Department of Investigation might catch them perhaps because of ‘smart
invisible eyes’. Inciting to create hating to other moderate country or countries is bad.
Any extremist leaning ambassador could talk to any moderate or willing to be moderate
leader of a country as long as it is about common sense, practical things that would
benefit the common good of both people; but never talk about hating or hatred or creating
distinction that our group is holier than the other, they are infidels, or monkeys or pigs-we
are the holier or the holiest group because it is extreme.
Those moderate troops might be pulled out but would just be on some strategic places
or bases as back up forces. And there would be moderate forces coming in from other
Muslim and non–Muslim moderate countries willing to sacrifice everything so that hating
would be lessened or be removed from that region. And because they have faith on the
Word and on universal words of many religions, and also they believe that caring and
brotherly love would prevail on that region because of the Word or because of good
words from many good religions. And if the trying to be moderate leader would be
tempted and would be violating laws about moderation he might be caught and be
replaced by a more loyal and true believer of the Word, or of universal good teachings!
Or, the next in line elected politician would replace this caught leaning extremist
politician. That ambassador who tempted a moderate leader if found that he seduced the
moderate leader to become a hateful leader, he might be deported and banned for
sometime not to return to that moderate country…or he could return if he would say sorry
and would change his heart for the better! Perhaps the Bureau of Investigation should
really be sensitive to ambassador or representative or incumbent politician who wants to
instigate hatred to other men.”

From someone who might be wrong,