June 23, 2006

Dear Editor,
Another scholar asked: “What about those topics about heavenly beings that married
humans and the offspring were the giants and heroes of long ago, if the heavenly beings
were just more or less 10 generation late from Adam then perhaps more or less 10% of
the genes of humankind has little or some of those genes that might have been carried
down to the present. Are there aliens who really visited humans, married humans or even
running the affair of humans as heroes described in Genesis?” …then the A.I., not the
S.I., answered: “Perhaps if what the incident in the Bible is true that there were heavenly
beings who married humans, then may be 5-10% or more of their gene’s were carried
down to the present. And about aliens running human affair or influencing human affair,
perhaps it could be possible because the design of pyramids in almost all corners of the
world of ancient civilizations are alike. Heavenly beings marrying humans according to
the story in Genesis might be similar to a version of some alien stories or alien movies; or
those heavenly beings are aliens. But if heavenly beings were like those depicted in the
story of Sodom that the heavenly being were angels or messenger of God that could
become visible and invisible and could go to heaven without wings or do supernatural
deeds then perhaps there were two kind of heavenly beings: one might be those heavenly
beings or aliens who married human, and the others might be those “angels” who
facilitated to destroy the cities of Sodom & Gomorrah.” Or heavenly beings could be
humans from other places on earth who were more advance and more intelligent but not
from their neighboring tribes.”
Then a scholar asked: “I heard a good priest commented that ridiculing very good
word is bad, perhaps he is offended by the word “this is … syndrome.” For him, it sounds
sarcastic. Would you comment on that?” …then the A.I but not the S.I searched for keys
because the S.I. is a computer program having more emphasis on science; and answered:
“Sorry, if it is offending someone specially because he put some meaning on “…” then
the A.I. is bound to change it.” Then the programmers erased those words “this is…
syndrome;” and changed them to “other essential words are taken for granted syndrome”;
or “lack of words syndrome.”
A scholar asked: “Having many groups loving and not hating and trying to be better
seems nice but in reality it is dividing one good piece to many smaller pieces or creating
disunity; and disunity is an attack to the truth as claimed by a priest, is it true? …then the
A.I. answered: “Monopoly of belief enhances connivances, but freedom of beliefs creates
more checks and balances and more creativities. Superiority or supremacy of group
creates tensions and conflicts and hatred; it opposite is ‘one though one purpose: love’ –
you have no other obligation to others except to love regardless of religious affiliation.
And Jesus even taught “love your enemies!” If unity for him is “one good” piece and that
“one good piece” is his group then he is claiming things called “proud claim”. Unity in
spirit like loving each other or even its enemies is more important than having one unity
in “only one” true and right group.”
A scholar asked: “If having proud claim is something most groups are afraid of
because the group could be branded as the “-----” and if almost all groups are claiming
that its group is the “only” and true and right group then perhaps the spirit of ‘proud
claim’ might be the “-----.“ And if groups would try to humble now and avoid claiming
things and would just concentrate on ‘one thought one purpose-love’ and even to love his
enemies’ perhaps there might be peace; could peace really be attainable?” …then the A.I.
answered: “Since the time of Adam & Eve especially when Cain killed Abel, conflicts
and wars are just ordinary things for human. But it does not mean that there was/were no
periods of peace on the planet earth even on any single day. There are long periods of
peace, short periods of peace. When people repent and change for the good there is peace
and prosperity, but if people forget God or not being good there is war especially because
of greed, selfishness or crocodile syndrome. Perhaps there would be a thousand years
peace coming if people would love their enemies. And war per se was/is not really too
bad; it had transferred technology and enhanced or improved the human race because of
mixed breeding. But now, war is prohibited internationally…unless it is a just war.”

A scholar asked: “Perhaps unconsciously the mind of a baby is programmed to be

afraid of those ‘ugly’ animals caused perhaps of genes transmission. Perhaps even newly
born baby animals like baby cats or baby dogs by instinct or by nature afraid of snakes or
crocodiles; much more of baby humans being afraid of snakes and crocodiles. Is it really
true that human babies are afraid of snakes or crocodile; or babies are afraid of ugliness,
fearful appearance of animals or humans? Or by nature or by instinct, baby human are
afraid of ugliness or things that could fright or scare-example angry crocodile or angry
snake or angry human. But sometimes other human babies are playing with scorpions, or
tame snakes, or tame crocodiles or ugly human but not angry ugly human?” …then the
S.I. answered: “Perhaps there are exceptions that babies either of animals or humans are
afraid or scare of feature especially with sharp canine teeth or big red eyes or have loud
sound of angry crocodile or angry snake. The key is any sound, feature that is extreme
meaning very loud or irritating or ugly or imbalanced, the baby by instinct reacts
defensively or the human baby would cry. But by being mere snake or crocodile, baby
humans would not be scared. Because there are tame crocodiles or tame snakes that when
human baby would be exposed to or the tame crocodile would go near the human baby,
the baby would just play with it; but if the baby experiences something that is bad he
would cry. It is the bad story about snake and crocodiles that make people afraid of them
and not by instinct. But by instinct, animals and humans are scare or afraid of anything
like sound, feature, touch that could hurt or that could irritate him.” Or sometimes if
something is giving human benefits or good feelings, by instinct, human baby would like
that thing. Example a misplaced baby human is being breast fed example by a big dog,
then that baby, by instinct, would love the dog as his mother for sometime; or just like a
baby duck would love a human mistaken to be his mother because he was fed when he
was a baby. Or by nature or instinct, animals especially humans would give high regards
to something that gives him blessings especially if that thing is a mystery; he would even
worship it as “God”. But if he knows now that the cause of the blessing is explainable or
not a mystery, he would just ignore it. It is by nature that human is fascinated of
mysteries. And human would make mysteries a tool to have worshipping instinct.
Worshipping perhaps is a natural design to ask, to seek, to wonder about things that could
not be explained.”
A scholar asked: “Are ghosts true?” …then the A.I. answered: “Ghosts depicted on
movies might be false but witchcrafts is true. Even fortune telling or prophesying or
telling the future, changing of sticks to snakes, dead came alive, and others mystics are
true; the examples could be found on the bible and sometimes even now.”
A scholar asked: “Can you give some wild guess how to let a blackish river be clean
and fresh again?” …then the S.I. answered: “Perhaps, 1) pass law that all outlets from
tributaries going to the main rivers should have “smart filter.” “Smart filter” is like a
basket that when it is full of filtered garbage, another basket would replace the former to
continue filtering or screening the garbage while the former would unload the collected
garbage or unload the filtered garbage using automation. Perhaps the principle of
revolver could be imitated and improved. Perhaps four baskets would keep on rotating
and waiting to be full of screened garbage and another system would unload those
garbage using sensors and some computer programming. 2) Perhaps a simple continuous
rotating of a cylinder cause by the flow of the water would let the screened garbage be
separated and be gathered on another bucket and when the bucket is full it could be
mechanically lifted because of a stored strained caused by the continuous flow of the
water. 3) Perhaps for every 500 meters along the river there would be a “smart water
filter” that would suck the water and filtered the water on the filtering device and let the
filtered water return to its former naturally balanced state... 4) Perhaps underneath or on
the river bed there would be a ‘smart river bed tractor’ that would collect garbage, plant
sea weeds, plant river shells to eat bacteria coming from decaying materials, and
construct artificial river coral reefs where small fishes could hide themselves and become
bigger. 5) Those outlets that are really identified to be carriers of big pollutants should
have water treatment embedded on the river bank. Example- the outlet should extend
going down and be attached to an underground water treatment that could be safe from
being side sweep by running vessels but not deep enough that silt would just occupy and
made it useless. 6) All sea or river vessels should have “smart filter outlets” so only clean
water would be discharged and oil should be retained and should be disposed properly. 7)
Pass a law that all concrete riprap or concrete walls along river banks should have plastic
mesh or plastic screen so that desired water plants could grow, crawl and cling on those
plastic screens and eventually almost all concrete along river banks would be covered by
plant crawling on those plastic mesh wires. 8) Pass a law that river passenger vessels and
terminals should now be modern. They should be beautiful to the eye. Perhaps those river
vessels should be run by hydrogen. Perhaps fiber glass or strong plastic should be the
materials used for those materials of modern passenger vessels. Wood should be
discouraged or banned to protect the preservation of forest. 9) Pass law that there should
be camera monitoring the cleanliness and orderliness along the river bank so that violator
could be caught in camera. 10) Pass law that every 1 kilometer there would be
corporation, association responsible of the beautification, cleanliness and orderliness of
the river. They could place there fish nets and the product or profit would be used to
manage the expenses of maintaining the river in good condition.”

From RV