IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION HOPEWELL CULTURE &

; DESIGN, LLC, PLAINTIFF, V. 1. ARCHOS SA 2. ARCHOS, INC. 3. ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. 4. ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL 5. DELL, INC. 6. MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. 7. MSI COMPUTER CORP. 8. RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED 9. RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION 10. SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC. 11. T-MOBILE USA, INC. 12. TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC. DEFENDANTS,

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-394

PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Plaintiff Hopewell Culture & Design, LLC (Plaintiff), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this Original Complaint against Archos SA, Archos, Inc., ASUSTek Computer Inc., ASUS Computer International, Dell, Inc., Micro-Star International Co., MSI Computer Corp., Research in Motion Limited, Research in Motion Corp., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications USA, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Toshiba America, Inc., ( collectively, Defendants) as follows:

NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a patent infringement action to stop Defendants infringement of United

States Patent No. 7,171,625 (the 625 patent) entitled Double-Clicking a Point-and-Click Interface Apparatus to Enable a New Interaction with Content Represented by an Active Visual Display Element. A true and correct copy of the 625 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Plaintiff is the exclusive licensee of the 625 patent. monetary damages. PARTIES 2. Plaintiff is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and

the State of Texas. Plaintiff maintains its principal place of business at 101 East Park Blvd, Suite 600, Plano Texas 75074. Plaintiff is authorized to do business in Texas. Plaintiff is the exclusive licensee of the 625 patent with respect to the Defendant, and possesses the right to sue for infringement and recover past damages. 3. Upon information and belief, Defendant Archos SA is a France corporation with

its principal place of business at 12, rue Ampere, Igny, 91430 France. 4. Upon information and belief, Archos, Inc. (Archos) is a corporation organized

and existing under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business located at 7951 E. Maplewood Avenue #260, Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111. 5. Upon information and belief, Defendant ASUSTeK Computer Inc. (ASUSTeK)

is a Taiwan corporation with its principal place of business at 4F, 150, Li-Te Road, Beitou District, Taipei City, Taiwan.

6.

Upon information and belief, ASUS Computer International (ASUS) is a

corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business located at 800 Corporate Way, Fremont, California 94539. 7. Upon information and belief, Dell Inc., (Dell) is a corporation organized and

existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business located at One Dell Way, Round Rock, Texas 78682. 8. Upon information and belief, Micro-Star International Co., Ltd., (Micro-Star) is

a Taiwanese corporation, with its principal place of business located at No. 69, Lide St., Zhonghe Dist., New Taipei City 235, Taiwan. 9. Upon information and belief, MSI Computer Corp., (MSI) is a subsidiary of

Micro-Star and a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business located at 901 Canada Court, City of Industry, CA 91748. 10. Upon information and belief, Research in Motion Limited (RIM Ltd) is a

Canada corporation with its principal place of business at 295 Phillip Street, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3W8, Canada. 11. Upon information and belief, Research in Motion Corp., (RIM) is a corporation

organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business located at 122 West John Carpenter Pkwy., Irving, Texas 75039. 12. Upon information and belief, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA),

Inc., (Sony Ericsson) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business located at 3333 Piedmont Rd., Ste. 600, Atlanta, Georgia 30305.

13.

Upon information and belief, T-Mobile USA, Inc., (T-Mobile) is a corporation

organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, with its principal place of business in the United States located at 12920 SE 38th St., Bellevue, Washington 98006. 14. Upon information and belief, Toshiba America, Inc., (Toshiba) is a corporation

organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business located at 1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 15. This action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et

seq., including 35 U.S.C. 271, 281, 283, 284, and 285. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case for patent infringement under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 16. The Court has personal jurisdiction over each Defendant because: each Defendant

has minimum contacts within the State of Texas and the Eastern District of Texas; each Defendant has purposefully availed itself of the privileges of conducting business in the State of Texas and in the Eastern District of Texas; each Defendant has sought protection and benefit from the laws of the State of Texas; each Defendant regularly conducts business within the State of Texas and within the Eastern District of Texas; and Plaintiffs cause of action arises directly from each Defendants business contacts and other activities in the State of Texas and in the Eastern District of Texas. 17. More specifically, each Defendant, directly and/or through intermediaries, ships,

distributes, offers for sale, sells, and/or advertises (including the provision of an interactive web page) its products and services in the United States, the State of Texas, and the Eastern District of Texas. Upon information and belief, each Defendant has committed patent infringement in the State of Texas and in the Eastern District of Texas, has contributed to patent infringement in

the State of Texas and in the Eastern District of Texas, and/or has induced others to commit patent infringement in the State of Texas and in the Eastern District of Texas. Each Defendant solicits and has solicited customers in the State of Texas and in the Eastern District of Texas. Each Defendant has many paying customers who are residents of the State of Texas and the Eastern District of Texas and who each use and have used the respective Defendants products and services in the State of Texas and in the Eastern District of Texas. 18. and 1400(b). COUNT I PATENT INFRINGEMENT 19. The 625 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391

Trademark Office on January 30, 2007 after full and fair examination. Plaintiff is the exclusive licensee of the 625 patent with respect to the Defendant, and possesses all rights of recovery under the 625 patent with respect to the Defendant, including the right to sue for infringement and recover past damages. 20. Upon information and belief, Defendant Archos SA has infringed and continues

to infringe one or more claims of the 625 patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell, and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States, internet tablet PCs, including Archos 28 and 32, allowing a user to double click or double tap a visual element representing interactive content and interact with a second version of the interactive content. 21. Upon information and belief, Defendant Archos has infringed and continues to

infringe one or more claims of the 625 patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell, and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States,

internet tablet PCs, including Archos 28 and 32, allowing a user to double click or double tap a visual element representing interactive content and interact with a second version of the interactive content. 22. Upon information and belief, Defendant ASUSTeK has infringed and continues to

infringe one or more claims of the 625 patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell, and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States, mobile devices, including the Eee Pad TF101 and TF101G, having software allowing a user to double click or double tap a visual element representing interactive content and interact with a second version of the interactive content. 23. Upon information and belief, Defendant Asus has infringed and continues to

infringe one or more claims of the 625 patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell, and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States, mobile devices, including the Eee Pad TF101 and TF101G, having software allowing a user to double click or double tap a visual element representing interactive content and interact with a second version of the interactive content. 24. Upon information and belief, Defendant Dell has infringed and continues to

infringe one or more claims of the 625 patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell, and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States, mobile devices, including the Dell Streak, Dell Streak 5, 7, and 10, having software allowing a user to double click or double tap a visual element representing interactive content and with a second version of the interactive content. 25. Upon information and belief, Defendant Micro-Star has infringed and continues interact

to infringe one or more claims of the 625 patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell,

and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States, mobile devices and software, including the MSI Windpad 110A, having software allowing a user to double click or double tap a visual element representing interactive content and interact with a second version of the interactive content. 26. Upon information and belief, Defendant MSI has infringed and continues to

infringe one or more claims of the 625 patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell, and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States, mobile devices and software, including the MSI Windpad 110A, having software allowing a user to double click or double tap a visual element representing interactive content and interact with a second version of the interactive content. 27. Upon information and belief, Defendant RIM Ltd has infringed and continues to

infringe one or more claims of the 625 patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell, and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States, mobile devices, including the Blackberry Playbook Tablet, Blackberry Torch, Blackberry Bold 9900 and 9930, having software allowing a user to double click or double tap a visual element representing interactive content and interact with a second version of the interactive content. 28. Upon information and belief, Defendant RIM has infringed and continues to

infringe one or more claims of the 625 patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell, and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States, mobile devices, including the Blackberry Playbook Tablet, Blackberry Torch, Blackberry Bold 9900 and 9930, having software allowing a user to double click or double tap a visual element representing interactive content and interact with a second version of the interactive content.

29.

Upon information and belief, Defendant Sony Ericsson has infringed and

continues to infringe one or more claims of the 625 patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell, and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States, mobile devices, including the Xperia X10, X10 Mini, X10 Mini Pro, X8, Xperia Arc, Xperia Neo, Xperia Play, and Xperia Pro, having software allowing a user to double click or double tap a visual element representing interactive content and interact with a second version of the interactive content. 30. Upon information and belief, Defendant T-Mobile has infringed and continues to

infringe one or more claims of the 625 patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell, and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States, mobile devices, including the MyTouch 4G, MyTouch 3G, Sidekick 4g, Comet, and G2x, having software allowing a user to double click or double tap a visual element representing interactive content and interact with a second version of the interactive content. 31. Upon information and belief, Defendant Toshiba has infringed and continues to

infringe one or more claims of the 625 patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell, and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States, mobile devices, including the THRiVE, allowing a user to double click or double tap a visual element representing interactive content and interact with a second version of the interactive content. 32. from Plaintiff. 33. Plaintiff is entitled to recover from the Defendants the damages sustained by Each Defendants aforesaid activities have been without authority and/or license

Plaintiff as a result of the Defendants wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, which,

by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. 284. JURY DEMAND 34. Plaintiff hereby requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court find in its favor and against Defendants, and that the Court grant Plaintiff the following relief: A. An adjudication that one or more claims of the 625 patent have been infringed, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by Defendants and/or by others to whose infringement Defendants have contributed and/or by others whose infringement has been induced by Defendants; B. An award to Plaintiff of damages adequate to compensate Plaintiff for the Defendants acts of infringement together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest; C. That the Defendants acts of infringement be found to be willful from the time that Defendants became aware of the infringing nature of its actions, which is the time of filing of Plaintiffs Original Complaint at the latest, and that the Court award treble damages for the period of such willful infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284; D. That this Court declare this to be an exceptional case and award Plaintiff its reasonable attorneys fees and costs in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 285; and E. Any further relief that this Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: September 8, 2011

By: /s/ Hao Ni Hao Ni TX State Bar No. 24047205 hni@nilawfirm.com Stevenson Moore Texas Bar No. 24076573 smoore@nilawfirm.com NI LAW FIRM, PLLC 3102 Maple Avenue, Suite 400 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 800-2208 Facsimile: (214) 800-2209 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF HOPEWELL CULTURE & DESIGN, LLC

10