Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Licensee
Licensed to David C Kemp on 11 May 2002
Conditions of use
This is a licensed electronic copy of a document where copyright is owned or managed by
Standards Australia International. Your licence is a single user licence and the document may not
be stored, transferred or otherwise distributed on a network. You may also make one paper copy
of this document if required.
Web Check-up
1 AS 1580.408.2—1993
Australian Standard
Paints and related materials—Methods of test
PREFACE
This Standard was prepared by the Standards Australia Committee on Paints and Related
Materials, under the direction of the Multitechnics Standards Policy Board, to supersede the
1984 edition.
This Standard reverses the numerical rating scale of the previous edition to agree with the
rating sequence adopted in ISO Standards. The requirements for preparation of test panels
and the test report have been modified.
METHOD
Licensed to David C Kemp on 11 May 2002. Single user licence only. Storage, distribution or use on network prohibited.
1 SCOPE This Standard method sets out two procedures for assessing qualitatively the
adhesion of a coating or coating system of any thickness, to a metal substrate by cutting
through the coating in a prescribed manner.
The method may be used to compare the adhesion of paint films or to assess the change in
adhesion of a coating after exposure, e.g. to natural weathering.
With appropriate modifications and by waiving the restraints of preconditioning and test
conditions, the test is readily applicable to field use.
3 PRINCIPLE The coating or coating system applied to the requisite metal substrate is cut
through to the metal in a prescribed manner and the ease of removal of the coating
determined.
4 APPARATUS
4.1 Knife blade—a sharp-edged, freshly honed knife blade with a sharp point of 45 degrees
or less, such as a scalpel.
NOTE: A scalpel would be suitable for low-build commercial coatings, however a more substantial
blade may be required for a high-build heavy duty coating.
COPYRIGHT
AS 1580.408.2— 1993 2
5 TEST CONDITIONS (For laboratory tests only). The test shall be performed under the
routine conditions specified in AS 1580.101.5 (see also Clause 1).
NOTE: In field testing, the ambient conditions will have to be accepted, however the temperature
of the test surface should be noted and reported.
7 PROCEDURE
7.1 General The parallel cut method is essentially an abridged version of AS 1580.408.4
but in practical terms is mainly intended as a ‘pass’ or ‘fail’ test, viz ‘complete removal’ or
‘no removal’ of the coating strip. It is not applicable for coatings less than 100 µm thick.
This contrasts with the 30-degree angle cut method which has no thickness restriction and
gives a gradation in performance, because the distance between the two cuts increases as the
Licensed to David C Kemp on 11 May 2002. Single user licence only. Storage, distribution or use on network prohibited.
COPYRIGHT
3 AS 1580.408.2—1993
(b) Hold the knife blade at right angles to the substrate to avoid ‘undercutting’ and, using
a single cutting action, make two 25 mm long cuts in the form of an ‘X’ through the
coating to the substrate so that the angle between the cuts is approximately 30 degrees.
Use the straightedge to guide the direction of the cut.
NOTE: If the score through to the substrate is not achieved in a single cutting stroke, disregard
the cut and perform another.
(c) Insert the point of the knife blade under the paint coating at the apex of one ‘V’ so
formed (i.e. a 30-degree ‘V’) and attempt to lift the coating from the substrate by a
gentle prising action.
(d) Using Table 1 assess the degree of adhesion of the coating.
TABLE 1
RATING OF COATING FOR ADHESION
Rating Previous
Appearance
scale rating
0 No removal 5
1 Trace peeling or removal along incisions 4
2 Jagged removal along incisions up to 1.5 mm on either side 3
3 Jagged removal along most of incisions up to 3 mm on either
side 2
4 Removal of most of the coating in the area subtended by the
cuts 1
Licensed to David C Kemp on 11 May 2002. Single user licence only. Storage, distribution or use on network prohibited.
NOTE: The values given in Column 3 are provided to assist users who wish
to compare panels previously rated in accordance with the 1984 edition of
AS 1580.408.2.
8 TEST REPORT The test report shall contain the following information:
(a) Identification of the coating or system under test.
(b) Identification and condition of substrate, where applicable.
(c) Description of knife blade used.
(d) Thickness, in micrometres, of the coating, and the method of measurement.
(e) Test conditions.
(f) Name of testing authority.
(g) Date of test and report number.
(h) The adhesion of the coating, in accordance with Clauses 7.2(e) or 7.3(d), as
appropriate.
(i) Time elapsed between application of the coating and the performance of the test.
(j) Whether the parallel cut method (Method A) (Clause 7.2) or the intersecting cut method
(Method B) (Clause 7.3) was used.
(k) Reference to this Australian Standard, i.e. AS 1580.408.2.
COPYRIGHT
AS 1580.408.2— 1993 4
This Austr alian Standard was prepared by Committ ee CH/3, Paints and Related Materi als. It was approved on behalf of the
Council of Standards Australi a on 21 December 1992 and publi shed on 17 May 1993.
Licensed to David C Kemp on 11 May 2002. Single user licence only. Storage, distribution or use on network prohibited.
Review of Australian Standards. To keep abreast of progress in industry, Australian Standards are subject to periodic review
and are kept up to date by the issue of amendments or new editi ons as necessary. It is important therefore that Standards users
ensure that they are in possession of the latest edit ion, and any amendments thereto.
Full details of all Australi an Standards and related publications wil l be found in the Standards Australia Catalogue of
Publications; this information is supplemented each month by the magazine ‘The Australi an Standard’, which subscribing
members receive, and which gives detail s of new publications, new editi ons and amendments, and of wit hdrawn Standards.
Suggestions for improvementsto Australian Standards, addressed to the head office of Standards Australia, arewelcomed. Notifi cation
of any inaccuracy or ambiguity found in an Australian Standard should be made without delay in order that the matter may be
investigated and appropriate action taken.