DEVELOPMENT OF EVAPOTRANSPIRATION CROP COEFFICIENTS, CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA, AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION MODELS FOR THE UPPER GREEN RIVER IN WYOMING

L. Pochop J. Borrelli R. Burman

November 1983 WWRC-8 3-0 1

Annual Progress Report Submitted to Wyoming Water Development Commission Cheyenne, Wyoming

Agricultural Engineering Department University of Wyoming Laramie, Wyoming

..

Contents of this publication have been reviewed only for editorial and grammatical correctness, not for technical accuracy. The material presented herein resulted from objective research sponsored by the Wyoming Water Research Center, however views presented-reflectneither a consensus of opinion nor the views and policies of the Water Research Center or the University of Wyoming. Explicit findings and implicit interpretations of this document are the sole responsibility of the author (s) .

Annual Progress Report to THE WYOMING WATER DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION by THE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

o f the
Uni v e r s i t y o f Wyomi ng

DEVELOPMENT OF EVAPOTRANSPIRATION CROP COEFFICIENTS, CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA, AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION MODELS FOR THE UPPER GREEN R I V E R September 28, 1983

Personnel FACULTY L a r r y Pochop, P r i n c i p a l I n v e s t i g a t o r John B o r r e l l i, P r i n c i p a l I n v e s t i g a t o r Robert Burman, P r o j e c t Manager GRADUATE STUDENTS Barbara Bajusz, S t a t i s t i c s Tom Crump, C i v i 1 Engineering Joan Schumaker, Water Resources STUDENTS Angela Hogan

Table of Contents Page No

. . .

2. 3

4.
5

................................... 1 Weather Station Location and Operation ......... 3 Lysimeter Installation and Operation ........... 6 Spatial Extrapolation of Meteorological Data ... 9 Plans for Future Work .......................... 12
Introduction

INTRODUCTION

In the summer of

1982 negotiations began between the Agricultural

Engineering Department, College of Engineering of the University of Wyoming,

and the Wyoming Water Development Commission which led t o a research project

with the basic objective of developing an accurate method of calculating agricultural water consumption in the Green River Basin. submitted by the Department on July 6 , 1982.
A proposal was

The proposal was accepted The project has been The

t h r o u g h a memorandum of agreement dated August 9 , 1982.

reviewed and accepted by the Commission f o r a second y e a r' s operation.

project i s j o i n t l y funded by the Wyoming Water Development Commission and the University of Wyoming Water Research Center. The research project has the following objectives. address these objectives.
1. To develop grass and a l f a l f a reference crop coefficients a t Farson
and Fontenel 1e , Wyomi ng

This report will

2.

To develop grass and a l f a l f a reference crop coefficients and crop coefficients for mountain meadow grasses a t Daniel, Wyoming.

3.

To

collect

solar

radiation,

wind,

humidity,

temperature,

and

precipitation from a network o f seven s i t e s in the Upper Green River Basin.

4.
To develop methods fo r transferring crop coefficients from location

t o location.
5.

To use existing ET models t o estimate consumptive use of agriculture,

reservoir, and phreatophyte use within the Upper Green River Basin.
6.

To develop a b a s i n wide model for consumptive use.

7.

To obtain existing ET data applicable t o the Upper Green River Basin.

Lysimeters were fabricated and p a rtia lly installed in the f a l l of 1982. Automated weather stations were purchased and t h e i r operation de-bugged during the f a l l and winter of 1982-1983. The i n st al l at i o n o f a l l lysimeters and weather stations was completed during the spring of 1983 and routine operations were established. Weather

stations were located a t o r near Rock Springs, Farson, Daniel, Merna, Big Piney, Seedskadee, and Mountain View. Farson and Seedskadee. Horse Creek watershed.

Two lysimeters were installed a t b o t h

Ten lysimeters were installed on or very near the The weather stations and lysimeters are a l l located on Figure 1 i s a map o f the Green River Basin in (All

land owned by cooperators.

Wyoming and shows the locations o f weather stations and lysimeters. figures and tables appear a t the end o f t h i s report.)

This progress report will have sections dealing with the operation of weather stations and lysimeters.
In addition, i n i t i a l investigations dealing

w i t h s t a t i s t i c a l and physical methods of extending results t o the whole Green

River Basin from research s i t e s will be discussed.

Samples of d a t a acquired

will be shown and an example of methods of extending d a t a will be shown.

WEATHER STATION LOCATION AND OPERATION

Introduction Seven weather stations u t i l i z i n g CR-21* microloggers manufactured by

Campbell Scientific of Logan, Utah f o r continuous recording of weather d a t a , have been installed i n the Green River Basin. The stations measure temperaThe

ture, relative humidity, solar r a d i a t i o n , w i n d run and precipitation.

CR-21 microloggers have microprocessors programmed t o record the aforemen-

tioned weather parameters a t specified time intervals. locations of the weather stations. Operation

See Figure 1 for

The weather stations were installed d u r i n g April and May 1983, as weather permitted; operation began immediately. The weather stations were repro-

grammed f o r reduced d a t a accumulation f o r winter months a b o u t October 1 s t .

During winter months stations only need t o be serviced a t six week intervals.

The f o l l o w i n g parameters are being measured a t the specified time interval

d u r i n g summer months:

1) t o t a l 24 hour precipitation
2)

t o t a l 24 hour solar r a d i a t i o n

3) maximum and minimum temperature and time of each over a 24 hour period
4)

maximum and m i n i m u m relative h u m i d i t y and time o f each over a 24 hour period

5)

average d a i l y temperature

*The mention o f brand names does not imply endorsement.

6)

average d a i l y relative humidity

t o t a l wind r u n each 4 hour period

7)
8) 9)

relative humidity sampled a t 4 hour intervals temperature sampled a t 4 hour intervals.

The number and frequency of weather parameter readings being recorded allows f o r a maximum interval of 15 days between v i s i t s . The d a t a stored on the micrologger are "dumped" onto a portable cassette tape recorder. The tape i s then transported t o Laramie and connected t o the

University computer system where the recorded d a t a are transferred and stored. Weather stations are usually visited on a weekly basis d u r i n g the crop
growing season.

Lysimeter operation ceased October 8 t h and 9 t h and the

T h i s enables a

weather stations were reprogrammed t o sample fewer parameters.

maximum of 43 days o f d a t a t o be stored between v i s i t s .

The climatic parameters measured between mid-October and mid-April are:

1) t o t a l 24 hour solar r a d i a t i o n 2)
3)

t o t a l 24 hour wind r u n

relative humidity sampled a t 24 hour intervals temperature sampled a t 24 hour intervals

maximum and minimum d a i l y temperature.

4)

5)

Tables 1 A and 19 show samples of d a t a o u t p u t from the weather stations a t Upper and Lower Horse Creek.
Similar d a t a i s available f o r a l l stations for

the entire summer and f a l l of 1983. Additional Weather Data Current and historic climatic d a t a f o r twelve a d d i t i o n a l s i t e s i n the Green River Basin i s available from the National Weather Service. locations of the National Weather Service stations are shown i n Figure 1. The

Approximately thirty years o f historical data - precipitation, maximum, minimum, and mean temperature - has been obtained to observe historical weather patterns in the Basin (see Spatial Extrapolation o f Meteorological Data section). patterns. Historical weather patterns should indicate historical ET

LYSIMETER INSTALLATION AND OPERATION

Lysimeter Construction The lysimeters used on the Green River Basin project' t o measure evapotranspiration were made from one-eighth inch thick steel plate and resemble a rectangular box w i t h the t o p open. 39.4 in. on a side. The lysimeters are 60 in. deep and

All corners are welded and sealed t o prevent water from Fig-

leaking in o r o u t and the entire steel lysimeter i s coated with paint. ure 2A shows dimensions and construction d e ta ils . caulked t o prevent leaks.

All welded seams were

An aluminum access tube, 1.5 in. diameter by 60 in. long with a rubber

stopper in each end was installed t o provide access f o r the measurement of soil moisture.
A 4 in. diameter by 60 in. long perforated PVC pipe with a

removable l i d was fabricated f o r use as an access t o measure water table depths and t o pump water o u t of the lysimeters when needed. This pipe was
A

wrapped i n fine mesh screen t o prevent soil from entering the perforations.

small, 3/4 in. diameter by 60 in. long perforated PVC pipe was installed t o be used outside the lysimeter t o monitor outside water tables t o the depth of the
1y s i meters

Lysimeter Instal lation After fabrication, and as weather permitted, the 14 lysimeters were transported t o the selected f i e l d locations in the Green River Basin. The

holes t o be dug were marked using a template which was s lig h tly larger than the bottom of the lysimeter and then the sod was cut and removed with a shovel.
To insure minimal disruption of soil s t r a t i f i c a t i o n , each layer of

soil was carefully removed and placed i n a separate pile.

When the hole was

approximately 58 i n . deep, the lysimeter was placed i n the hole and leveled. The 4 i n . perforated PVC pipe was placed vertically i n one corner and the aluminum access pipe was positioned vertically i n the center of the lysimeter. The soil was then replaced inside the lysimeter i n the reverse order of removal and the sod replaced on top.
A t six locations, the sod was n o t

replaced because these lysimeters were planted w i t h a l f a l f a or a l t a fescue grass.

To complete the lysimeter i n s t a l l a t i o n , the small perforated PVC pipe

was placed vertically i n a p i l o t hole located outside, b u t near the lysimeter. Figure 2B shows a typical operation. Lysimeter Operation Once the lysimeters are installed, i t i s relatively simple t o determine the evapotranspiration ( E T ) from each s i t e .
Knowing the quantity of precipi-

completed lysimeter installation,

ready for

t a t i o n which f a l l s on each lysimeter ( P ) , the amount o f water added o r removed

(WA

WR),

and the change i n soil moisture

AS^), one can apply

a simple water

balance t o determine ET.

ET
= P

+ (WA

WR) + ASM

D u r i n g the summer of 1983, a l l the lysimeters were monitored once every

week.

The amount of precipitation a t each lysimeter s i t e was measured using a

t i p p i n g bucket r a i n gauge t h a t i s wired i n t o a CR-21 micrologger or by a

simple, non-recording plastic r a i n gauge.

A q u a n t i t y of water, slightly i n

excess o f the anticipated weekly ET, was added t o the vegetated surface o f the lysimeter i n a fashion t o simulate f l o o d i r r i g a t i o n . becomes WA i n the water balance. lysimeter. This amount of water

Figure 3 shows the a d d i t i o n of water t o a

The only remaining term i s the change i n soil moisture, AS,,,,, which

i s determined by measuring the weekly f l u c t u a t i o n i n water table depth w i t h i n

the lysimeter along with the change in the soil moisture above the water table.
A neutron soil probe i s used t o measure the soil moisture above the

water table.

Figure 4 shows the use of a neutron soil probe.

Occasionally, This

a f t e r heavy r a i n f a l l , i t i s necessary t o remove water from a lysimeter. i s done using a hand operated diaphragm pump as shown in Figure 5. the water table in a lysimeter, water must also be pumped o u t . water removed i s measured and becomes WR in the water balance.

To lower

The amount of

A computer a t the University of Wyoming i s utilized t o compile a l l the

f i e l d d a t a and t o p r i n t o u t values of ET f o r each lysimeter.

Tables 2a

t h r o u g h 2e show a typical computer print o u t of pertinent information relating

t o four lysimeter units.

The computer i s also used t o plot cumulative ET All values shown are provisional and may be None of the results should be

graphs as shown in Figure 7 .

revised upon additional analysis and review. considered as being f i n a l .

The d a t a i s shown t o i l l u s t r a t e the information

being generated by t h i s project. The crops inside the lysimeters were cut a t the same time the surrounding f ie lds were harvested. The cuttings were dried and weighed and will be used Figure 6 shows a crop of fescue grass being cut on a

t o estimate crop yields.

1ys i meter.

SPATIAL EXTRAPOLATION OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA

Meteorological d a t a are an essential component of a l l models t o estimate the consumptive use of water by agriculture, reservoi rs and phreatophytes in the Upper Green River Basin (UGRB). Since i t i s impossible t o collect t h i s

d a t a a t a l l locations within the basin f o r which consumptive use estimates are

needed, the d a t a available will be extrapolated t o intermediate locations of inte r e st. This will be done t h r o u g h a 2-stage modeling process.

I n the f i r s t stage, a model will be used t o exploit the relationships between meteorological variables and physiographic information. analysis will be used Regression available elevation,
\

to

detect

relationships

between

the

meteorological d a t a and selected physiographic features ( i .e. slope, e t c . ) .

Simple s t a t i s t i c a l models will be formed t o describe these

relationships and t o predict values of relevant meteorological variables a t intermediate locations. The second stage will refine the stage one predicted values.
For those

s i t e s with d a t a , predicted values will be compared with measured values, and a

1ocal correction factor (observed value

- predicted value) calculated.

The

correction factor values will then be spatially extrapolated over the UGRB,
and provide estimated model

corrections f o r intermediate locations.

The

purpose o f the spatial extrapolation procedure i s t o describe t h e weather patterns endemic t o the area which could not be accounted f o r in the prediction model. The final estimates t o be used in the consumptive use

models, will be of the form

Y = (1 st stage model prediction) + (estimated model correction).

One spatial

extrapolation technique

(second stage of

the modeling

process) i s i l l u st rat ed in Figure 8a through 8d.

Figure 8a gives the location

of 10 stations within the basin f o r which average daily temperature values are

available f o r June, 1983. reported a t each station. extrapolate these values.

Figure 8b gives the average daily temperatures Figure 8c i s the map of the triangulation used t o Figure 8d i s the contour map of average daily Several

temperatures fo r June, 1983 produced by the extrapol ation program.

numerical and s t a t i s t i c a l extrapoliation techniques will be compared in stage

two of the modelling process, and the most useful one selected.
The final products o f t h i s spatial extrapol a t i o n of meteorological d a t a

will be a s e t of meteorological maps for the basin for each month of the year. These maps will in t u r n be used in the consumptive use models t o produce a 30year average consumptive use estimate for the UGRB, as well a s a frequency distribution fo r consumptive use estimates f o r the basin. distribution will The frequency climatic

f a c i l i t a t e water use planning under unusual

conditions, such as in 1983, as well a s under "average" conditions.

Transfer of Crop Coefficients The determination of crop coefficient values requires direct measurement
of consumptive use by the crops of interest.

A t present, t h i s information i s Since t h i s information has n o t

available only t h r o u g h lysimeter operation. been previously collected i n the UGRB,

the lysimeters installed f o r t h i s

project will be operated fo r three consecutive years t o insure sufficient d a t a

f o r re1 iable crop coefficient estimation.

Once the crop coefficients have been determined a t each lysimeter s i t e for the crops of i n t erest (mountain meadows and a l f a l f a ) , the 2-stage modeling process outlined above (see also spatial extrapolation of meteorological d a t a ) will be used t o transfer these coefficients t o other locations in the basin. Basin-Wide Estimation of Consumptive Use The spatial extrapolation o f meteorological d a t a and crop coefficients will provide the necessary input fo r consumptive use models a t locations on a regular g r i d across the basin. The appropriate model ( i . e . fo r agriculture,

phreatophytes, and reservoirs) will then be applied a t each grid point t o get local estimates of consumptive use.
A basin-wide estimate of consumptive use

will be constructed from a weighted sum of these local estimates. This procedure will be repeated using various meteorological patterns observed in the UGRB t o produce a frequency distribution f o r basin-wide consumptive use.
A graphical i l l u s t r a t i o n of a consumptive use frequency

distribution i s given i n Figure 9.

Figure 9 i s a histogram of the frequency

distribution of estimated total ET a t Big Piney as calculated from the meteorological d a t a f o r 1942 t h r o u g h 1978.

PLANS FOR FUTURE WORK

Lvsimeters and Weather Stations Operation o f the lysimeters and weather stations has been on a routine basis during the summer o f 1983. The collection of d a t a will continue in the

summer of 1984 with m i nor modifications resulting from experience gained in the summer o f 1983. Numerical Model i ng Existing models useful f o r predicting agricultural water consumption in the Green River area will be p u t in a useful form f o r computer analyses. addition, new model s will be developed where necessary. In

Aggressive activity

on the models i s necessary because o f the immense amount o f d a t a being

col 1ected.

. .

*UPPER GREEN RIVER BASIN

KEY
Drainage Divide County Line P r o j e c t Lysimeter !

A
A

P r o j e c t Weather Station
N a t ' l Weather S e r v i c e Weather S t a t i o n

F i g u r e 1.

I I I I
I

/
/

CORNERS - WELDED A N D SEALED

I I
I

STEEL. PLATE ON 5 SIDES

7

I I I

/
FIGURE 2 A LYSIMETER PLAN

LY S IMETER BOUNDARY
OUTSIDE OBSERVATION WELL

.-

NEUTRON PROBE ACCESS TUBE

/
"IEVV

4' DIA., ACCESS PIPE'

SECTION ' A - A '

FIGURE 2 B LYSIMETER INSTALLED

Figure 3

- Adding

Water to a Lysimeter

Figure 4

- Using

a Neutron Soil Probe to Measure Soil Moisture

Figure 5

- Pumping Water

O u t of a Lysimeter

Figure 6

- thrvesting

a Crop on a Lysimeter

CUMULATIVE EVAPOTfUNSPIRATION AT BENUIS NEAR DANIEL, VYOMING

MY-SEPTEMBER 1983
24 4A ALFALFA (FROM SEED) 4B ALTA FESCUE GRASSFROM SEED) 4C MTN MEItDOV GRASSFf?OM SOD) 4D UTN MEMOV GfUSS(FR0U SOD)

--I -*

22 -

20
18 16 14
U

------- - -

/-

10

8 -

5/26 6/03 6/17 6/24 7/01 7/09 7/15 7/22 7/29 8/04 8/10 8/19 8/24 9/02 9/11 9/16 9/24

F i g u r e 7.

@/

12

DATE

41.44

41.42

CE2Q
MERN PINE

41.40 -

41.38

BIFP -

41.36

Y 3 41.34 n
a
I

E 41.32 E! U

41.30
I -

FPNT

CT I

41.28

L21.26

KEMR

41.24 -

GRNR

41.22

CHUR

41.20

108.9

'

MTVU
I

-I .--

108.8

108.7

108.6 108.5 108.4 108.3 LBNGITUDE [DECIMflL DEGREE)

108.2

108.1

108.0

Figure 8a.

Reference map of NOAA weather stations in Upper Green River Basin,

DEC I M l DEGREES FL

r D

rr

P,

G
a

Y ID

0 Y

n ,

110

100 -

93 r

80

70

60

50

Figure 8c.

Map of the triangulation used by the contouring routine.

W 0

F i g u r e 8d.

Contour map of average d a i l y temperatures f o r June, 1983.

BIG PINEY - YEARLY ET TOTALS C1948-77) AVERAGE = 15.914, S = 0 . 6 3 3

U M

N
6

B E R

0
F '
Y

E
A

R S

14.66

15.126

15.592

16.@58 16.524

16.99

17.456

TOTAL ET

Figure 9.

T a b l e 1A.

Climatic Data f o r J u l y 1983 from U p p e r Horse C r e e k .

T a b l e 1B.

C l i m a t i c D a t a f o r J u l y 1983 from Lower Horse C r e e k .

F'ARS (IN

2A

2h
2A
261

2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 26 2A 2A 2A 2A
2A 2A

E3 K t3:3 t33 8:3 83 133 133 83 13 3 I33 tJ3 1x3 1x3

3 618

6 23 7 2
7 Y 7 1.5 7 21.

0 00 *7:L 0 t 00

0 00

-1.+'tQ

o,oa
*s1
+ 76

7 30

83 83
8:3

8 s 8 12 8 1Y 8 25 Y 3 9 11 5' X b Y 24

*36 *32 16 12 +Of3

0*00 0,ou X*Y:3

2*98

1*50
0 * 00

0I00 3. * :33 13 3 78 50 85 1. 27 1 :36

0*00

3*:39
2*:10

U*OO 09 1.2

0*00

23 :3 0
2El

I *'?8
1+26
2*:17

*11 07 +I4

18 36
54

3 2 : 3

0 00 t47
0+00 08

1 4'3 1* ' 43
1 't'? . 0.00 1t 't'? 1*6:3 1 43 . ' *60
y j 25 37 25 41 13 41 * 2 5

1*49
l*h9 2 + :30 1. :13 1 '39 .
1t 13s 1L 3 1

3*47 3 7y
4*:30 5 3 t3 : 2 /3t3 5 * 1)s 6.17 4 70 3 32
0*00 4+06 1* 7 8

21,

I5

JY
*6 3
*61 03 4l E

I2

25 *24 33 1.9

2*43

22
*30

*37
Ih
0.00 *11. *'I0

'

56 77
94
*41. 0.00
0*00 :t 6 0

0.00 3 219 5 t 't9 7*'t7 8*73 10.90 14e 1.3 17* :;p 2 1 * 29 3 25 ds9 31 5 ; : 3 4 40 32 t ' 6 ' 1 't 5 63 5 0 33
x 3 + 64
0 * 00

43 75 41 +50 40 38 47 * 0 0 '4I3 25 448 + 25 "'t * 13 y 9 72;

47 s 0 42 4 3 37 t 5 0 4 0 *63
TuI:)lJ ' I; :3A
:3A

0*00 1. * 6 0 +70 1 o: ? + 26 2.00 1 35 . 1. + 56 1. hP 2 46 3 49 1. 4. 0 8 2.431 1 : 3 7

2+61 65
5 at3 3 + 44 21 45; 4 ZP ti 24

1 5 04
33

27 * .o' Ld 37

4. Oh

OY
c1 .9 57

2*30 3 33 : 513 j
5 t su

5*84 8*45 9* 1 0 21*57 25 * 16 32. l o

4 0 Y7
14+1U 17 * 6 1 1

* 01 16*37 18 25 18*00 10*61

26 07 27 38 32 El'? :32 5 :1

23

* 1.7
28

4'1

35
*50

72

*71
1. 1 9

8 137 2 74 7+40 21 48 1. *I31 3*02

0*00

18 32 17
+ 14

1r Z 7 46 * 02 43
:36

6 93 : 13 49 I 0 1. 13 12 h't I h * 1.3 17*2:l.

2 0 * 12

15
0 00

38
0*00

2 : L 49 22*21 2:3 3 3 '

43 71 5 1* 1.1 2 4* t y ; ; 5hr40 5'3 * 4 2

0*00

29 47 8 1 2 f)'] I4 e 33 1 8 *18 :t 7 Y P
J8*2:3 : L 8 + 64

1x3 133
El3

:ilA Ilk 34 :3h 3A 3A 3A 3A :3A

:3A 3A 3A

13:3 83 1x3
8 3

5 2ci 6 18 6 25 7 2

0 00
*:3h 0 4. 0 0

0 00

2 89 0 00

12*50 Yt25 16*25

5*00 1'1 * 0 0 1.3 5 19 38 1.2 1.3

0*00

2 6E)
. I .

8:3 83

7 Y 7 Id) 7 22 7 30
8

*'t:3 *6tl

*a2
*04 t3'?

83
tX3

8 1.1
8 1Y 8 25

*I1 *37 1+30

*75

It72 .-.* :jy 1 * 07 U*00 1*w .75

. I

1. 2 I 1. 51 02 1. 53

6 + 131 3*07 3 132

* 12 17

1+04 78

3A
3A

83 83 83 83
133

*75 0 * 00 75

9 3 Y 10 Y I6 Y 24

*32
*5S

-*xi
0 00 0 00 *30

1 2 *75 ldt If) 6.00 1x EN3 27*00 31 *25

35 23 218 1 3

'32
1 :32 -*20 l.*:11

015 3*90 2 + 64 1*(?7 2 :34

* 22
--*(lo 22

--

30 44 5 : ;
0 1.

6 8L :

Y E38
13*71 1:3 * 65 17 5s ; 20 19 22 * 16

* sci

17 *I0

IS

3 :35
-*SO

.X 6
%+YO + 78

*I5
+03

le45

2 131 1*35 7*37 1 (?Y 3 h7

--

* 22
02

1El
07

+41 13 18

44 25 * 39 + 36 Oh * 47 17 1.05 33 44)

24

sI

27 * 15

27 * 3s 30 * l h 31 72
39 0 8 't1 0 7 't4 7'1

T a b l e 2a.

P r e l i m i n a r y R e s u l t s f o r 19$3 Green R i v e r B a s i n E v a p o t r a n s p i r a t i o n Study.

x
3

g
I.,

i ;

w c

m
'd 0

v3
rl

0 00

5*01 ""1 . ,.J

2 * 64

0 + 00
1. *79 !Y3 dt2 1 45 . 1. 52

4 y;
3. 5 3. 1. 0 6

o*o0

(I * 0 0 Of1
08

0*00

0 00

*20
'22 1.5

1 * 7'3
38

4 * f;:',
6* 06 7 * 1.2 10 * 8 0 :I.4 66 16 * 15 2 0 93 1 2:3 75 23 4 1 1 29 33 2'2 33 33 54 37 76 40,lI ft1 55
0*0(1

0 * 00

06
21.

0.00 1 SO 0.00 * 75 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 * 00

7E3

l*70
1. 0 9 1. *'?I,

3 3 1. 4 2 4
4

68
t3Q

yJ

2 E30 4* 25
5*77 6 * 58 1 + 26 3 '3 35 11126 11 * 95
x:1 * 7 5

'39

22 13 .
21 .

* SS
33 5;q 46 *#l

:33 77
134)

18
32 *04

29 2.0 1. 45 I 64 .
4

72 52
6P

* OY
09 *41

*03
1. b

'33

* 30

56
0.00 1 13:3

3 4 2 1.

1:3 I20

22
:34 43

24
1.5 07

+60
39

18
0*00
20 :4 3

I 4 E7 3 15 7'9 I.&+ 36

0 00 OE3

'34 16
3. *46 1 42 1 *21 . 2*69 1*20 2 43
1 0z -.47
*"

13
02 21.

06 53
52

4 65 7 , (1% 7 't6

20
Z? 0 34

*51

* 136

11*17 14 713 17 E M 24 7 0
27 7 4 : 3 92 3

*20 *41 13
08 + 04 24

*:?I.
1*03 32

-- * 2 0
3.0

:36
1 69 .

36 + 5 1 35 33 36 + 25
4 0 *:;5 42 39 ' * 14 1 5
0t 00 :3 * 1.? ' :3 * 6 f B 4*41 4 0El

'32
+ 135'

15 *I1
0 00 :L :I. I

41. 3Y
28 0*00

E:I::ARD

's

4R
4A 4A 4 A 4A

13 3 83 83
1'33 t3:3 13:3

s 26
6 17 6 24 7 3.
7 Y 7 15 7 22 7 2Y ti3 9
f3 10 13 1.9 8 2'1
'j, 2 9 1 1 'j,

0 00

75
0*00

.-.* ; t

0 * 00

0 *'th

"th
ZtA YA

16 * 36 24

* 37
1 *5:L * $33

1x3

04
*20

76
0*00 1 I:L . i 1 5:L

94
461
9A

1x3 83
133 t3J 13 3 13 3 83 13 3 83 :

*I6
0*00 1. *ss

'IA
JtA 4A 3A 4A

36 3:t *'?I
0*00 0 00

*76 -1 2:t 76

* 8:3
Q*00

0*00 11* 19 49 73 :33 1 18 . 1. :t 1 . 1. :32 "" 0 3. 1. :3Y 1 063 . 2+:L4 1 h1 E 2 *'?0

. -. .

0 00

1+24 I. 4 135
133 3*00 24131 3 :35
-- 02

15 07 *10
--*04 20

* 37
18
20

--*I0
*50

3 54 2 75

--

")*'

14 19 0 tl
12

*40 41 E --*a0

9*26 6 37 7 69
7 t bl.l '?* 0 7
10*1.A 12*30 13*9t3

rL.J

59
*:31.

3 43

4*27
ft ( 3 3

43 19 *;?I
13
1E1

1*0Y

1.6

63
1. 43

l.60
21 4 62

*47 * 54 *:32
45

x5

Elf3 16*51
17 t 94

9 24

Q (10

Table 2c.

Preliminary Results for 1983 Green River Basin Evapotranspiration Study.

0 t 0I )

.-.1. 2 b
**

0.00

0*00

0 00

0*00
440

0400

(5

* 00
t:L

21 5 0 1. :t 4
130 .-.I* 08 1. *:30

El 13t3

1 3:t .

..
t

2 I38 2 *0 3
.

74 3*:31
2

16 4 16 *11 -- 13
22 08 t 1.4 1.7

*YI

--

2Y
34

fs

:3 * 5 0 3 * 63
413

0 00 1 10 3 11 *77

1:3 + 7?

*60
0 00 1 50 .

57
(?I!>

l*44
2 45

52; *21
zjs

4 3s 5 66 6 22
4

11 4 06

14+ 37 1 5 Ell
4

7*19

113 4 26
2 0 El0

.11 22 69 26 * 7Y ZFi + 63 1 14*60 22.94 2:l. 63 25 5 ()

224 4 31

:I.

s0

1.*00

:I. t Y 0 0 4 00 75

71. *I31
4

2*54 1 *t30
2 *0 7 1. 44 4 :3f1 2 * 44 4 28 2*0Y

4%
30 23

12
09 1. 1 * 19 .

1 4 13 3 1 90 3 9*71
:t 0 2t3 12 * 0 0

57 1. *72
Y7

* 2Y
49
27 86
t

-1.

0 00
0 00

13 1 05

411
34
410

1. 68

132
1. 1 19,y:;

26

12rY7 14*66 1 5 4t3

4

22 4 6 0 24 * 67 26* 11 30 4u : 24 Y5 3
4

25 6 0
2 36

5*17 12e41
4*50

J7 23

39 4 32
0*00

22 79 26 + 1.9
0 :t

z!:;

0 00

0*00

2 :L 7
t

t35

1. SY 1 t5 0 . :I. 0 4 0 00 0 (10

25 * 0 0 22 * 0 0 3. b 0 0 22 (5 0 30 00 c: j; t;(1

17 29 t I. 5
t
4

43 t 75
$19

07

17
1 * If3 75 t 67
21. 4 6 l C 4 6ci
4

46
30

0 00 :3 75 5 4 11 h EV 7 *4 0 1 0 1.Y

26
08 27

1 413 *74
74 0*00

31 3fl 34 45 0
36.00 35 3 l E

*74

.-. 59
0 00
t 1 3 tD

83

36 0 0 2 4 25 3
4 1. 0 0 44 38 0 2 1. 1. 00 :33

21 06 17 *15
*00

15 42 37
6l
27

* 01.
4

27
5 (32 3 24
2 (33 0.00

12 26 1 4 * 1.0 :I.4 4 59 164 19 113 a 53 113r83 20 33 21 4 6*t 2 1 4 65 23 4 8 0

52 14476 17 * 49 113 8 1 25 + El13 3L * 1 4 : 35 Ell 37 * 07 41 4 13 47 0 6 37 E3 l 51 4 6 3 54rY6 53.99 60*45

t?
4

2* 6 t 3 12 05
7 t :I.1 3

-..:L 2 113
h+Ell

20 7 2 2Y*8;2 24 59 28 61 25 0 3 2!3 Ej2

3 0 24

28*91 21 0 1 37 + 64
-* 00 :I. t 4 7 8

ti13
133 13:3

5 26

(5

411 4u
tI>

83
t3:3
IX3 13:3

6 I7 6 24 7 1 .
7 Y

00 *75

0 0I )

1 96 .
yj

0*

u0
11 .
j.8

0 00
4

0 * 00

0 4 00

0 + 00 16 *96
*24

28

t30 1. t 35
76 0 00 0 ou

:t s 1. 0 6
1. 13:s

2 &(?
*70

1 I1
8 1

.tU

13:3 4 D 133 it11 t3:3 t I> t3:3 3 1 EX3 1 4 1 t3:3 1 ti> t3:3 ID 1 3 3 ID x 3

71.5 7 22 729 ti l t 13 10
63 :t.Y t 24 3 9 2

04
*20

l.6
0*OO 1t 513

I *913
74
:I. *t t3 0 00

9 1.1. 3 1.4) 9 24

*:3& 31 : ,Y:L
0*00 0 00

1 53 . 1. *:30 1. 2 1 1. 4 24 1 I34 . :38

3 3 3 3

I3El

:1 3
OEI :t b

16 If3 *31 22 * 19
420

46 42 34
78 15 5

:3 * 61 *t*76

2. 1
420 * 08

47 51 . yJ
52 4 1.9
t

5 El2 7 4 67 3 20 10 t SIJ

5 * 92 (?a 1 6 12 t 1 (1 . 14478 1 9 48 23 37
4

5*57

4*67
95 2 ;35 4 73

* 74

* 32
1 M> 65 44
4

10
t21.

26

....

t3:L 8y3

8; =3

l*&5
2.39

13

0*00

* 12

33 *30
t

11*72 1 z * 96 1 4 4 10 1 5 4 17 16.10 174Y6 113 6 1 lY*55

4

2 6 4 b 13 2 Y + 76

32,9 1 37 58 33 Si 1
3 0 El13 1 + 62 5 47 4 27

; It7 : -:t 0 92 5*10 :I.5 13 1 22 7 3 : 22 E l 9 23 t3:3 1 s :1 !

15*t7 14+f1:33

4Y 4 66

19.72 23 217 28 * 66

Table 2d.

Preliminary Results for 1983 Green River Basin Evapotranspiration Study.

M(:1:I::mJlui: UI:~.I-~L

(IN)
0 00 87
0 00
*':.4.. '7 .I

(IN)
or00
2 74

(IN)
0 + 00

(CM)

(%)
OIOO

* 1E1
12
t

t3b
1. *20 27 1. 1 Y
(38

0 00 * *t 6 t 31.

6* Yb (?* 15

1.7

16
+ "ttj

0 00

z 44
2*:31. 1. + :30 2 53 1. :35 2 cs3 t :t ti1 136

0*00 0t 0 0

*04 * 15 . 4Y 11 .
t
t

43 *10 :ilU
t

1 24
t

38
22 32

ow
32
'14

2E1 t Pl

55
8t)

12*19 1 2 E18 1.5*91 22 1 :t 24 35 30*%1 33 * 52

02 22*00 2t:r t3f3 32 t 1.7

51 03 : 39 67 :3h 63
:37 2 1

28 29 2 : ; 34

33 0"' \J

3Y.YS
' 3 * 313 1

12
1. 22 0 00 0 t 00

22 29
02

* 57
74

--

3 t 48
0ttl0 23 5:; 1. + 06 1. :l 0
1. 25 + (31

--t14 !5 0
0 t 00
t

--

04 t 36

12 .6
I 1

30 0 6 30 * 51 ' 8 e 32 1 57,I.s
O*OO

34 95 :33*21
25.98 Y*S1 32;* dj 7

0 00

Q0
*hO

87
0.110

24
1s 16)

* 3Y
*40

(?* 0 1 11 t71

08

32 *:LA 41 3
0 00 0*00
0tOO Of3

18 t10

4s 26
1 t O't lr47
t 817 + 65

14*51 17+68
1Y*75

2 *0 4
4 (54 2 * 06 1. 54 1. 5 1 24

41. 58 * 34 26
t

24 93 36 72 41 Y S
'15 15 ft9 * 70

19.10 21 5 5 24 2 0 ; Y 21 z :30 + l 5 c : 07 3 2 33 0 8 45 *:30 3%29

t

*:32 3*t * :t2 1. 22 0 00

0.00

IY
-*04 3Y 13

--

48 10

:3:3
t

78

' t Y

10 .

3 54 1*01 30 .4 4+ :31

* 51
62

1*00 32 I* 2 Y . 1*57

313 * O'? 6 0 t 65 68 t 37

79 * 33

26 't :t :31 6 2 25 (90 :3:3 28 48 1 3

t

Table 2e.

Preliminary Results for 1983 Green River Basin Evapotranspiration Study.