Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
two GE frame 6 turbines. During this outage, GE has upgraded the honeycomb
seals at the third stage of the turbine.
GE at first was unsure about what our TTK1 was for, I told them about the peak
modification. I verified this and sent our complete 1D list to GE. Here's what
were our control curve constants:
I worked out the Y intercepts and came up with the following linear equations:
BASE
PEAK
This all seems pretty straight forward to me from a technician's perspective. But
then I was handed GE's proposed new constants (they even added an equation at
the top of each set of constants... presumably to help 'clarify things'):
First things first, I questioned GE's units on the K and M curve. That was
apparently an oversight; they meant to say FSR, not MW or DW.
My first real question in all of this is, what is Xc in GE's equations above? I had
to work out the CPD BIAS and FSR BIAS curves again with these new
numbers because their slope was so steep... and their Y-intercepts were so
close...
BASE
PEAK
So the curves I work out from their points dont correspond to the equations that
they have given with either y intercept or slope. I just can't wrap my head
around what Xc represents. The intercept is *close* but not exact, and the
slopes are nowhere close.
The other thing that I can't work out is this. While the CPD curves do not
change much with this modification, the FSR curves do. The base load curves
move in a more conservative direction. As FSR increases, we are more limited
in temperature. That makes sense with better 3rd stage seals; more work is
being done --- for a constant exhaust temperature, combustion temperature
would have to be higher. Since we haven't done anything to allow higher
combustion temps, the exhaust limit would have to be lower to take this into
account. SO...
I hope it's clear that it's very difficult to have primary and
secondary exhaust temperature control curves based on two
different variables (CPD and FSR) be exactly equal to each
other at all times. So, that's why the two are slightly offset from
each other, with the secondary being slightly higher (to the
right) of the primary. Again, the unit should never operate on
the secondary exhaust temperature control curve, and if it
does, it should only do so for a short period of time (while the
CPD transducer problem is being resolved).
As for the Xc value, I've only recently seen this formula and
notation, and I've not been curious enough to investigate. I'm
not even going to hazard a guess, because I have no idea what
it means, nor how these values are determined, nor how they
are used to derive the TTKn_x array values. I would suggest you
ask your GE field service person to ask someone in GE
Engineering what Xc means, and how the values in the
formulae are determined. (My guess is that this formula isn't
supposed to be provided "to the field" and that it is considered
proprietary and so it will be difficult to get information about its
terms and usage. But, that's just my personal guess; I hope I'm
wrong, and that you can find out what Xc means, and then
explain it to all of us!)
Hope this helps! Again, the unit should only operate on Primary
(CPD-biased) exhaust temperature control. Secondary (FSR-
biased) exhaust temperature control should only be active in
the event that there is some problem with the CPD transducers,
and even then it should only be operated on secondary exhaust
temperature control while the CPD problem is resolved.
And, finally, it's very difficult (at least for those of us without
access to the data and computing horsepower that GE has!) to
closely correlate (cross-reference; super-impose) the two
graphs (CPD-biased and FSR-biased) on top of each other to
see how they might interact. The best thing I can say about this
is to monitor TTRXP and TTRXS when the unit is operating. And
that TTRXS should be slightly higher than TTRXP at all times
when operating on Base Load or Peak Load, so that the unit
only operates on Primary exhaust temperature control.