Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Faculty of Science
Department of Biology
Is Homeopathy Effective?
By Clinton Muscat
Malta
©2009
Abstract
A paper discussing the basis of homeopathy and while taking into consideration the available
scientific papers on the subject with special reference to peer-reviewed literature discuss if
homeopathy is effective or if it is just a placebo effect.
Introduction
For thousands of years man have tried to improve his health in various ways. Homeopathy is
one of the alternative medicine practices available to the conventional one. It originated in the 18th
century created by Samuel Hahnemann and is based on Hippocrates philosophy that "like cures
like”. Later Hahnemann observed that the more he diluted the extracts the more effective it was.
This brought about a lot of controversy especially between doctors and other professionals that
prefer conventional medicine to this alternative natural medicine.
Scientific Research
There have been several scientific attempts and clinical trials to show that homeopathy is effective.
And although several trials most of which done by homeopaths indicate that homeopathy is
effective, only a few are peer-reviewed. C. Hill and F. Doyon in (1990) reviewed random trials on
homeopathy in which results of homeopathy treatment was compared to conventional treatment
and placebo. Despite the review shows that in some cases the homeopathy is effective, the change
was insignificant therefore it was concluded that “results do not provide acceptable evidence that
homeopathic treatments are effective." On the other hand several studies show that homeopathy
can be effective in curing flu(Lynda Liu, 2000). Clinical studies have also indicated that homeopathic
treatment had positive effects on rheumatoid arthritis (Gibson, Gibson, ManNeil, Buchanan, 1980)
and osteoarthritis (Shipley, Berry, Broster, Jenkins, Clover, Williams, 1983) and in increasing soreness
in muscles (Vickers, Fisher, Smith, Wyllie, Lewith, 1997).
Conclusion
Quite a number of people believe that homeopathy aims to strengthen the body defense
and heal the person as a whole by stimulating his immune system rather than suppressing
symptoms. Although this can be effective no scientific basis can explain that the more diluted the
medicine is the more effective it will be. From what I have read I can conclude that despite
homeopathy can work in some cases, it is still unexplained and no mechanism is known until now.
Homeopathy could become much more accepted if clinical studies and scientific research show
more significant differences in their results.
References
Gibson, R., Gibson, S., MacNeill. (1980). Buchanan Homoeopathic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation
by double-blind clinical therapeutic trial, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 9(5): 453-9.
Hill, C., Doyon, F. (1990). Review of randomized trials of homeopathy. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique;
38(2):139-47.
Lockie, A. (2000). Encyclopedia of Homeopathy, London, Great Britain: Dorling Kindersly Ltd.
Lynda, L., (2000). Fighting the flu with alternative remedies, WebMD, retrieved 22nd March 2009, from
http://edition.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/01/07/berrying.flu.wmd/index.html .
Shipley, M., Berry, H., Broster, G., Jenkins, M., Clover, A., Williams, I. (1983). Controlled trial of homoeopathic
treatment of osteoarthritis. Lancet, 1(8316): 97-8.
Vickers, A., J., Fisher, P., Smith, C., Wyllie, S.E., Lewith, G.T. (1997). Homoeopathy for delayed onset muscle
soreness -A randomised double blind placebo controlled trial, Brit J Sports Med,31(304):307.