Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Report on
Global Warming & Carbon Credit
Group: G-3
Group Members:
Dr. S. B Patil
Anand Deshpande
Samidha Ghatge
Sachin Hambar
Anand Deshpande
Aniruddha Borkar
1.1 Introduction
There is a growing concern about global warming and the impact it will have on people and
the ecosystems on which they depend. Temperatures have already risen 1.4°F since the
start of the 20th century—with much of this warming occurring in just the last 30 years—and
temperatures will likely rise at least another 2°F, and possibly more than 11°F, over the next
100 years. This warming will cause significant changes in sea level, ecosystems, and ice
cover, among other impacts. In the Arctic, where temperatures have increased almost twice
as much as the global average, the landscape and ecosystems are already changing rapidly.
Most scientists agree that the warming in recent decades has been caused primarily by
human activities that have increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, have increased significantly since the Industrial
Revolution, mostly from the burning of fossil fuels for energy, industrial processes, and
transportation. Carbon dioxide levels are at their highest in at least 650,000 years and
continue to rise. There is no doubt that climate will continue to change throughout the 21st
century and beyond, but there are still important questions regarding how large and how
fast these changes will be, and what effects they will have in different regions. In some parts
of the world, global warming could bring positive effects such as longer growing seasons and
milder winters. Unfortunately, it is likely to bring harmful effects to a much higher
percentage of the world’s people. For example, people in coastal communities will likely
experience increased flooding due to rising sea levels.
The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to begin taking steps
to prepare for climate change and to slow it. Human actions over the next few decades will
have a major influence on the magnitude and rate of future warming. Large, disruptive
changes are much more likely if greenhouse gases are allowed to continue building up in the
atmosphere at their present rate. However, reducing greenhouse gas emissions will require
strong national and international commitments, technological innovation, and human
willpower.
The instrumental temperature record shows the fluctuations of the temperature of the
atmosphere and the oceans as measured by temperature sensors. As is seen in the figure,
The X axis represents the time, and the Y axis represents temperature anomaly in degree
Celsius. 'Anomaly' roughly means departure from a baseline. In this figure, the 1961–1990
global average temperature is used as the baseline value. The annual global temperature
determined is subtracted from this base value and the result obtained is plotted on the
graph corresponding to the year on X axis.
In order to understand the mechanics of global warming, let’s see how the Earth is
“powered” by the Sun (through solar radiation), how the energy (radiation) between these
two entities is continuously recycled, and how this cycle maintains the equilibrium
temperature of the Earth.
Here is how this process works:
The Earth receives its original supply of radiation from the Sun.
The Earth then reflects 30% of this solar radiation back into space in its original form.
The reflection of light back into space - largely by clouds, ice sheets etc.
The Earth absorbs the remaining 70% of this solar energy and then re-radiates it
back into space in the infrared radiation form.
So in order to maintain thermal equilibrium, the amount of radiation reflected and re-
radiated from the Earth must be equal to the amount of the original radiation received from
the Sun.
The main immediate global warming cause is the increased concentration of greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere. The greenhouse gases are the by-products of many human
activities. Once emitted, some of these greenhouse gases end up in the atmosphere, where
they trap a certain amount of originally solar energy (which would have otherwise escaped
to space), and thus radiate this energy back to the Earth raising the planet’s average
temperature.
Fossil Fuels
The first fundamental global warming cause is an absolute dependence of the modern
human society on the burning of fossil fuels, which is the most important source of
greenhouse gas emissions. The focal point of this cause is the generation of energy for use
both in industry and commercial/private sector.
Fossil fuel combustion is especially heavily used as a source of energy for industry. In fact,
industry literally cannot exist without fossil fuels. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the main
greenhouse gas emitted as a by-product of fossil fuel combustion. This gas is the most
important immediate global warming cause.
Some amounts of carbon dioxide are removed from the atmosphere by the carbon sinks,
such as tropical rainforests and oceans, as part of the process of carbon exchange between
the atmosphere and the Earth (“carbon cycle”). This carbon exchange has been taking place
for thousands of years. It is an implicit guarantor of the Earth’s climate stability since the
amount of carbon on the planet is more or less constant.
Carbon is indeed “the chemical basis of all known life”. The carbon content of past living
organisms has been stored in the form of fossil fuels – oil, gas and coal, which we use in
virtually every aspect of our lives.
But the problem is that, the amounts of these fuels burned to provide society with energy
represent the carbon captured by photosynthesis over millions of years. So, by burning
them…we have returned carbon dioxide to the atmosphere thousands of times faster than
the rate at which it was removed by the early tropical forests. In other words, we now
release very large amounts of carbon dioxide at a very high rate, and the nature is unable to
remove it in good time.
This leads to the accumulation of extra carbon in the atmosphere and, consequently, to
global warming.
We have some other industry-related activities (usually called industrial processes) which
are also significant sources of greenhouse gases such as fluorocarbons, carbon dioxide as
well as small amounts of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O).
The products whose manufacturing causes the emission of these gases include cement,
minerals, chemicals, metals.
Many activities related to industrial processes use large amounts of energy and thus
produce significant amounts of greenhouse gas emissions through fossil fuel combustion.
But industrial processes also produce greenhouse emissions not related to fossil fuel
combustion but rather related to the use of specific methods and materials for the
manufacture of the products mentioned above.
So the first global warming cause is related to activities which are performed to generate
energy for industry and commercial & private sector needs.
Land Usage
The second fundamental global warming cause is related to the way we use our land, i.e.
land use.
Among other applications, most common land use activities include:
Modern agricultural practices employed to breed animals, grow cereals, fruits &
vegetables and other foods, all for human consumption. The two important greenhouse
gases emitted by agricultural practices are methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N20).
Clearance of land for timber sales or for the expansion of human settlements / cattle
ranches. Alongside a cocktail of pollution released as part of this process, the main
greenhouse gas emitted is carbon dioxide (CO2).
A very important element of this area is tropical deforestation, especially by way of
forest fires, which alongside other pollutants causes the release of carbon dioxide.
A significant component related to, but different from, land use is waste management.
The main greenhouse gas emitted as a result of waste management activities is
methane, with some small amounts of nitrous oxide.
2.1 Introduction
A carbon credit is a generic term for any tradable certificate or permit representing the right
to emit one tonne of carbon or carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2).
Carbon credits and carbon markets are a component of national and international attempts
to mitigate the growth in concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs). One carbon credit is
equal to one ton of carbon dioxide, or in some markets, carbon dioxide equivalent gases.
Carbon trading is an application of an emissions trading approach. Greenhouse gas
emissions are capped and then markets are used to allocate the emissions among the group
of regulated sources. The goal is to allow market mechanisms to drive industrial and
commercial processes in the direction of low emissions or less carbon intensive approaches
than those used when there is no cost to emitting carbon dioxide and other GHGs into the
atmosphere. Since GHG mitigation projects generate credits, this approach can be used to
finance carbon reduction schemes between trading partners and around the world.
2.2 Background
Burning of fossil fuels is a major source of industrial greenhouse gas emissions, especially for
power, cement, steel, textile, fertilizer and many other industries which rely on fossil fuels
(coal, electricity derived from coal, natural gas and oil). The major greenhouse gases emitted
by these industries are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydro fluorocarbons (HFCs),
etc., all of which increase the atmosphere's ability to trap infrared energy and thus affect
the climate.
The concept of carbon credits came into existence as a result of increasing awareness of the
need for controlling emissions. The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has
observed that:
“Policies that provide a real or implicit price of carbon could create incentives for producers
and consumers to significantly invest in low-GHG products, technologies and processes.
Such policies could include economic instruments, government funding and regulation”
While noting that a tradable permit system is one of the policy instruments that has been
shown to be environmentally effective in the industrial sector, as long as there are
reasonable levels of predictability over the initial allocation mechanism and long-term price.
The mechanism was formalized in the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement between
more than 170 countries, and the market mechanisms were agreed through the subsequent
Marrakesh Accords.
2.3.4 Adaptation
The Kyoto Protocol, like the Convention, is also designed to assist countries in adapting to
the adverse effects of climate change. It facilitates the development and deployment of
techniques that can help increase resilience to the impacts of climate change.
The Copenhagen Accord, for the first time, unites the US, China and other major
developing countries in an effort to curb global greenhouse gas emissions. The Kyoto
Protocol did not achieve this - it imposed no obligations on developing countries to
restrain the growth of their emissions, and the US never acceded to it. The accord also
says developed countries will aim to mobilize $100bn per year by 2020, to address the
needs of developing countries.
On the other hand, the summit did not result in a legally binding deal or any
commitment to reach one in future. The accord calls on countries to state what they will
do to curb greenhouse gas emissions, but these will not be legally binding commitments.
Furthermore, there is no global target for emissions reductions by 2050 and the accord
is vague as to how its goals - such as the $100bn of funds annually for developing
countries - will be achieved.
In 1997, the UNFCCC spawned the Kyoto Protocol. But neither of these agreements can
curb the growth in greenhouse gas emissions sufficiently to avoid the climate impacts
projected by the IPCC. In particular, the Kyoto Protocol's targets for reducing emissions
apply only to a small set of countries and expire in 2012.
Negotiations therefore began on new treaty that was bigger, bolder, wider-ranging and
more sophisticated than the Kyoto agreement, and the plan was that these would
conclude in Copenhagen.
In some parts of the world this is already having impacts - and a Copenhagen deal could
not stop those impacts, although it could provide funding to help deal with some of the
consequences.
Greenhouse gases such as CO2 stay in the atmosphere for decades; and concentrations
are already high enough that further warming is almost inevitable.
Many analysts suggest an average rise of 1.5C since pre-industrial times is guaranteed.
2.5 Cancún Summit, COP 16: A Brief Overview
The Cancún Climate Change Summit, COP 16, took place in Cancún, Mexico from 29
November to 10 December 2010. The negotiators faced many challenges picking up from
the widely-criticised Copenhagen summit.
2.5.1 Expectations
Copenhagen, COP 15 (7 December to 18 December 2009), was under considerable pressure
from the international community to deliver a legally binding document to cut greenhouse
gas emissions. The end result, however, was the non-binding Copenhagen Accord, a two-
page agreement which states that future temperature rises should be limited to 2°C, but
included no emission targets. This deal was far from any global agreement on replacing the
Kyoto Protocol (due to expire in 2012) and was largely seen as a failure of global
cooperation.
Before the Cancún talks even began, any high expectations fell after several key people,
including UN Secretary Ban Ki-Moon and UNFCCC Executive Secretary Christiana Figueres,
expressed little hope for reaching any new binding deal at Cancún, and urged to reach a
modest agreement instead.2
The major challenge facing Cancún was to transform the Copenhagen Accord into a working
plan of action. Many hoped that Cancún would be seen as a turning point in climate change
negotiations.
2.5.2 Outcomes – the deal reached
The Cancún talks resulted in the Cancún Agreement, which received a lot of praise from
delegates compared with the Copenhagen Accord. However, the international reaction to
the talks was mixed; many politicians hailed it as a milestone in global climate negotiations,
while many scientists and green campaign groups reported that it lacked substance.
The following is a brief summary of the major deals reached:
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission cuts – Pledges4 made by individual countries to cut
GHG emissions by 2020 in the Copenhagen Accord were formally introduced into UN
documentation. The extent of pledged cuts varied from country to country.
Developing countries also agreed to start researching how they could start to cut
emissions, but made no pledges. It should be noted that scientists believe that the
current pledges will still lead to at least a 3°C temperature rise 5,6, far above the
accepted “safe-warming” level of 1.5–2°C.
Kyoto Protocol – Its fate, including whether there would be a second phase, was
deferred until Durban, COP 17 (28 November – 9 December 2011).
Green Climate Fund – The creation of a global fund to help tackle climate change
was approved; it will support programmes, policies and other activities in developing
countries. It will be run largely by developing countries, under the eye of the UN. No
amount of funding was officially agreed upon, although many ministers from
developed countries repeated their promise of raising US $100 billion by 2020.
Developed countries also took note of the fast-start finance agreed upon at
Copenhagen last year to raise US $30 billion by 2012.
REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) – Formal backing
was given to stop and reverse destruction of forests, given that deforestation
currently produces 15% of the world’s carbon emissions. Rich countries will pay
poorer countries not to destroy forests. Details surrounding the REDD scheme are
still limited, especially regarding whether or not developed countries can use it to
offset their emissions. No scheme would start until 2013 at the earliest.
Carbon technology – The idea of setting up a mechanism to allow sharing of low
carbon technology between developed and developing countries was agreed upon.
A technology executive committee (TEC) and a climate technology centre (CTC) are
due to be established.
Inspections – Countries have agreed to allow for verification of their emission cuts.
The monitoring, reporting and verification will depend on the size of a country’s
economy. However, who will be responsible for and carry out the inspections is yet
to be decided.
New market mechanisms – Existing market mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol
are International Emissions Trading (IET), Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and
Joint Implementation (JI), which allow emissions to be traded or offset. The
establishment of new, larger-scale market mechanisms were deferred until Durban.
However, this will also include discussions surrounding current proposals with
regards to CDM (e.g. whether to include carbon capture and storage (CCS) and
nuclear-based activities) as well as non-market based mechanisms such as carbon
taxes.
The question that remains to be answered is whether Cancún has provided enough building
blocks to pave the way to a new global treaty at Durban.
2.5.3 International reaction and comments
The general consensus was that Cancún was a success compared with Copenhagen and was
a sign of international cooperation. UK Climate Change Minister Chris Huhne said that he
believed “a global deal on climate change was now back on track” 8. On the other hand, the
Global Wind Energy Council commented that Cancún was only counted a success because of
the extremely low expectations going into the talks.
“Cancún may have saved the [UN] process but it did not yet save the climate," said Wendel
Trio, Greenpeace International Climate Policy Director 9. Friends of the Earth shared a similar
view, commenting that “the outcome is a weak and ineffective agreement, but at least it
gives us a small and fragile lifeline.”
2.5.4 Looking forward
Cancún put the global climate change negotiations back on track after the disappointing
outcome at Copenhagen. However, the toughest decisions remain to be addressed in
Durban or beyond.
Durban will need to close the gap between the emission cuts to date and the much deeper
cuts analysts say are required to meet the minimum “safe-warming” level of 2°C. Other
issues that need to be addressed following on from Cancun include funding for the green
climate fund; where, when and who will organise the TEC/CTC; who will carry out
inspections; and what form the REDD scheme will take. Perhaps the toughest challenge will
be resolving the fate of the Kyoto Protocol, which must be decided upon at Durban, as the
Protocol expires in 2012. As it stands, Russia and Japan have announced that they would not
sign a second phase unless both the US and China were also legally bound. It will be
interesting to see where the US and China stand later this year.
It remains to be seen whether COP 17 in Durban can produce a real action plan. Many
analysts are stressing that whether a new global deal can be reached in Durban will depend
on the decisions of individual nations during 2011.
2.6 Conclusion
There is a great opportunity awaiting India in carbon trading which is estimated to go up to
$100 billion by 2010. In the new regime, the country could emerge as one of the largest
beneficiaries accounting for 25 per cent of the total world carbon trade, says a recent World
Bank report. The countries like US, Germany, Japan and China are likely to be the biggest
buyers of carbon credits which are beneficial for India to a great extent.
The Indian market is extremely receptive to Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Having
cornered more than half of the global total in tradable certified emission reduction (CERs),
India’s dominance in carbon trading under the clean development mechanism (CDM) of the
UN Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is beginning to influence business dynamics in
the country. India Inc pocketed Rs 1,500 crores in the year 2005 just by selling carbon
credits to developed-country clients. Various projects would create up to 306 million
tradable CERs. Analysts claim if more companies absorb clean technologies, total CERs with
India could touch 500 million. Of the 391 projects sanctioned, the UNFCCC has registered
114 from India, the highest for any country. India’s average annual CERs stand at 12.6% or
11.5 million. Hence, MSW dumping grounds can be a huge prospect for CDM projects in
India. These types of projects would not only be beneficial for the Government bodies and
stakeholders but also for general public.