Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Plaintiff,
CASE NO.: 1
Defendants.
THIS CAUSE, having come before the Court on March 19, 2002, on Patricia and
Peter Alexander’s Motions to Quash Subpoena and Alternative Motions for Protective Order and
the Court having heard the argument of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises,
1. This Court finds that an average person viewing the film entitled “The Profit” could
.
perceive that it is a parody of the Church of Scientology.
2. To the extent that any person considered as a potential juror in evaluating any
issues involving the Church of Scientology, the process of voir dire provides a fair and complete
remedy to eliminate any potential juror that may possibly have been influenced to be less than fair
and impartial.
3. The parties also have the additional remedy to move for a change of venue if, during
the jury selection process, they are unable to seat a jury that has not been prejudiced by any
4. The Court is aware that the discovery at issue herein relates to the Counterclaim in
the instant action, and that the Trial on the Complaint and any issues related to said Counterclaim
5. The Court finds that, while that the discovery sought may be relevant to the
Counterclaim, it would be best addressed subsequent to the conclusion of the resolution of the
7. Finally, the Subpoenaed Parties are Ordered to maintain and preserve the documents
and/or other materials which are the subject of the subject Subpoenas, and are Ordered to refrain
from disposing of, secreting, destroying, or in any way changing the status quo of the documents
2002.