Está en la página 1de 5

Deforestation causes global warming

Key role for developing countries in fighting greenhouse gas emissions


4 September 2006, Rome – Most people assume that global warming is caused by burning
oil and gas. But in fact between 25 and 30 percent of the greenhouse gases released into the
atmosphere each year – 1.6 billion tonnes – is caused by deforestation.

About 200 experts, mostly from developing countries, met in Rome last week to address this
issue in a workshop organized by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change (UNFCCC) and hosted by FAO. “We are working to solve two of the key
environmental issues – deforestation and global warming – at the same time,” said FAO
Senior Forestry Officer Dieter Schoene.

Trees are 50 percent carbon. When they are felled or burned, the C02 they store escapes back
into the air. According to FAO figures, some 13 million ha of forests worldwide are lost every
year, almost entirely in the tropics. Deforestation remains high in Africa, Latin America and
Southeast Asia.

Readiness to act

Delegates of the 46 developing countries present at the Rome workshop signalled their
readiness to act on deforestation, 80 percent of which is due to increased farmland to feed
growing populations. Part of the solution is to increase agricultural productivity so that there
is less demand to convert forests into farmland.

But they also stressed that they needed financial help from the developed world to do the job.
A major flow of capital from north to south – under new instruments still waiting to be
negotiated -- would be required to help the developing nations conserve their forests.

Such incentives could come in the form of carbon credits as further action under the Kyoto
Protocol, which governs greenhouse gas emissions from industrial sources in developed
countries. It could also come directly under the Climate Change Framework Convention, or
from bilateral agreements between donors and developing countries on country-wide forest
conservation projects.

Such questions are subject of ongoing international negotiations, which will continue later this
year in Nairobi.

The Rome workshop was supported by FAO and the Governments of Italy, Australia,
Finland, the Netherlands and New Zealand.
Causes of Global Warming
“As human-caused biodiversity loss and climate disruption gain ground, we need to keep our
sights clear and understand that the measure of a threat is not a matter of whether it is made
on purpose, but of how much loss it may cause. It's an ancient habit to go after those we
perceive to be evil because they intended to do harm. It's harder, but more effective, to "go
after," meaning to more effectively educate and socialize, those vastly larger numbers of our
fellow humans who are not evil, but whose behavior may in fact be far more destructive in the
long run." (Ed Ayres, editor of Worldwatch magazine, Nov/Dec 2001)

Carbon Dioxide from Power Plants


In 2002 about 40% of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions stem from the burning of fossil fuels for
the purpose of electricity generation. Coal accounts for 93 percent of the emissions from the
electric utility industry. US Emissions Inventory 2004 Executive Summary p. 10

Coal emits around 1.7 times as much carbon per unit of energy when burned as does natural
gas and 1.25 times as much as oil. Natural gas gives off 50% of the carbon dioxide, the
principal greenhouse gas, released by coal and 25% less carbon dioxide than oil, for the same
amount of energy produced. Coal contains about 80 percent more carbon per unit of energy
than gas does, and oil contains about 40 percent more. For the typical U.S. household, a
metric ton of carbon equals about 10,000 miles of driving at 25 miles per gallon of gasoline or
about one year of home heating using a natural gas-fired furnace or about four months of
electricity from coal-fired generation.

Carbon Dioxide Emitted from Cars


About 33% of U.S carbon dioxide emissions comes from the burning of gasoline in internal-
combustion engines of cars and light trucks (minivans, sport utility vehicles, pick-up trucks,
and jeeps).US Emissions Inventory 2006 page 8 Vehicles with poor gas mileage contribute
the most to global warming. For example, according to the E.P.A's 2000 Fuel Economy
Guide, a new Dodge Durango sports utility vehicle (with a 5.9 liter engine) that gets 12 miles
per gallon in the city will emit an estimated 800 pounds of carbon dioxide over a distance of
500 city miles. In other words for each gallon of gas a vehicle consumes, 19.6 pounds of
carbon dioxide are emitted into the air. [21] A new Honda Insight that gets 61 miles to the
gallon will only emit about 161 pounds of carbon dioxide over the same distance of 500 city
miles. Sports utility vehicles were built for rough terrain, off road driving in mountains and
deserts. When they are used for city driving, they are so much overkill to the environment. If
one has to have a large vehicle for their family, station wagons are an intelligent choice for
city driving, especially since their price is about half that of a sports utility. Inasmuch as
SUV's have a narrow wheel base in respect to their higher silhouette, they are four times as
likely as cars to rollover in an accident. [33]

The United States is the largest consumer of oil, using 20.4 million barrels per day. In his
debate with former Defense Secretary Dick Cheney, during the 2000 Presidential campaign,
Senator Joseph Lieberman said, "If we can get 3 miles more per gallon from our cars, we'll
save 1 million barrels of oil a day, which is exactly what the (Arctic National Wildlife)
Refuge at its best in Alaska would produce."

If car manufacturers were to increase their fleets' average gas mileage about 3 miles per
gallon, this country could save a million barrels of oil every day, while US drivers would save
$25 billion in fuel costs annually.
Carbon Dioxide from Airplanes
The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates that aviation causes 3.5
percent of global warming, and that the figure could rise to 15 percent by 2050.

Carbon Dioxide from Buildings


Buildings structure account for about 12% of carbon dioxide emissions.

Methane
While carbon dioxide is the principal greenhouse gas, methane is second most important.
According to the IPCC, Methane is more than 20 times as
effective as CO2 at trapping heat in the atmosphere. US Emissions Inventory 2004 Levels of
atmospheric methane have risen 145% in the last 100 years. [18] Methane is derived from
sources such as rice paddies, bovine flatulence, bacteria in bogs and fossil fuel production.
Most of the world’s rice, and all of the rice in the United States, is grown on flooded fields.
When fields are flooded, anaerobic conditions develop and the organic matter in the soil
decomposes, releasing CH4 to the atmosphere, primarily through the rice plants. US
Emissions Inventory 2004

Water Vapor in the Atmosphere Increasing


Water vapor is the most prevalent and most powefull greenhouse gas on the planet, but its
increasing presence is the result of warming caused by carbon dioxide, methane and other
greenhouse gases. (See NOAA's National Climate Data Center (NCDC) FAQ page) Water
vapor holds onto two-thirds of the heat trapped by all the greenhouse gases.[129] As the Earth
heats up relative humidity is able to increase, allowing the planet's atmosphere to hold more
water vapor, causing even more warming, thus a positive feedback scenario. Because the air
is warmer, the relative humidity can be higher (in essence, the air is able to 'hold' more water
when its warmer), leading to more water vapor in the atmosphere, says the NCDC. There is
much scientific uncertainty as to the degree this feedback loop causes increased warming,
inasmuch as the water vapor also causes increased cloud formation, which in turn reflects heat
back out into space.

Nitrous oxide
Another greenhouse gas is Nitrous oxide (N2O), a colourless, non-flammable gas with a
sweetish odour, commonly known as "laughing gas", and sometimes used as an anaesthetic.
Nitrous oxide is naturally produced by oceans and rainforests. Man-made sources of nitrous
oxide include nylon and nitric acid production, the use of fertilisers in agriculture, cars with
catalytic converters and the burning of organic matter. Nitrous oxide is broken down in the
atmosphere by chemical reactions that involve sunlight.

Deforestation
After carbon emissions caused by humans, deforestation is the second principle cause of
atmospheric carbn dioxide. (NASA Web Site) Deforestation is responsible for 20-25% of all
carbon emissions entering the atmosphere, by the burning and cutting of about 34 million
acres of trees each year. We are losing millions of acres of rainforests each year, the
equivalent in area to the size of Italy. [22] The destroying of tropical forests alone is throwing
hundreds of millions of tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year. We are also
losing temperate forests. The temperate forests of the world account for an absorption rate of
2 billion tons of carbon annually. [3] In the temperate forests of Siberia alone, the earth is
losing 10 million acres per year.
City Gridlock
In 1996 according to an annual study by traffic engineers [as reported in the San Francisco
Chronicle December 10, 1996] from Texas A and M University, it was found that drivers in
Los Angeles and New York City alone wasted 600 million gallons of gas annually while just
sitting in traffic. The 600 million gallons of gas translates to about 7.5 million tons of carbon
dioxide in just those two cities.

<>Carbon in Atmosphere and Ocean


The atmosphere contains about 750 billion tons of carbon, while 1020 billion tons are
dissolved in the surface layers of the world's ocean.
Also:
Forests 610 billion tons of Carbon
Soils 1580 " " "
Deep Ocean 38100 " " "
Source: U.S.Global Change Research
Information Office

Permafrost
Permafrost is a solid structure of frozen soil, extending to depths of 2.200 feet in some areas
of the arctic and subarctic regions, containing grasses, roots, sticks, much of it dating back to
30,000 years. About 25% of the land areas of the Northern Hemisphere hold permafrost,
which is defined as soil whose temperature has been 32 degrees Fahrenheit (0 degrees
Celsius) for a period of at least 2 years. Permafrost is under 85% of Alaska land surface and
much of Canada, Scandinavia and Siberia and holds about 14 per cent of the world's carbon.
The hard permafrost on which is built homes and other buildings, can, with rising
temperatures, turn into a soft material causing subsidence and damage to buildings, electric
generating stations, pipelines and other structures. Ground instability would cause erosion,
affect terrain, slopes, roads, foundations and more. [121]

Svein Tveitdal, Managing Director of the Global Resource Information


Database (GRID) in Arendal, Norway, a UNEP environmental information
center monitoring the thawing of permafrost, told a meeting at the 21st session
of the United Nation's Governing Council in Nairobi, Kenya on February 7,
2001: "Permafrost has acted as a carbon sink, locking away carbon and other
greenhouse gases like methane, for thousands of year. But there is now
evidence that this is no longer the case, and the permafrost in some areas is
starting to give back its carbon. This could accelerate the greenhouse effect."
(83)

In a December, 2005 study climate models at National Center for Atmospheric Research
(NCAR) show that climate change may thaw the permafrost located in the top 10 feet of
permafrost, releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. "People have used models to study
permafrost before, but not within a fully interactive climate system model," says NCAR's
David Lawrence, the lead author. The coauthor is Andrew Slater of the University of
Colorado's National Snow and Ice Data Center. "Thawing permafrost could send considerable
amounts of water to the oceans," says Slater, who notes that runoff to the Arctic has increased
about 7 percent since the 1930s. According to the NCAR press release (December 19,
2005) permafrost may contain 30% of all the carbon found in soil worldwide. In areas to a
depth of 11.2 feet climate models (assuming business as usual scenarios) show permafrost
presently in an area of 4,000,000 square miles shrinking to 1,000,000 square miles by 2050
and 400,000 square miles by 2100. With a scenario of low emissions (assuming a high degree
use of alternative energy sources and conservation) permafrost is still expected to shrink to
1.5 million miles by 2100.........In a USA Today (December 26, 2005) interview David
Lawrence says, "If that much near-surface permafrost thaws, it could release considerable
amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, and that could amplify global warming,"
….."We could be underestimating the rate of global temperature increase."

In a study reported in the journal Science June 16, 2006 (see San Francisco Chronicle article)
researchers say that thawing permafrost may add to the buildup in atmospheric greenhouse
gases significantly, stating that present climate models do not include releases of Siberian
carbon dioxide from permafrost. Dr. Ted Schuur of the University of Florida traveled to
Siberia and secured samples of permafrost soil up to 10 feet in length, maintaining it in a
frozen state until arriving back in his laboratory, where the thawing soil was attacked by
microbes, releasing carbon dioxide in the process. The frightening scenario that scientists,
Sergey A. Zimov of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ted Schuur and Stuart Chapin III of
the University of Alaska, paint is one of hundreds of billions of tons of greenhouse gases
entering an already destabilized atmosphere this century, spurring yet more warming in a
positive feedback syndrome. Extend this scenario to Alaska, Canada and Scandinavia, where
permafrost underlies much of these regions and there's no other way to describe it. We're in
trouble.
<>
Tundra
A name very suited to the environs of the arctic and subarctic, tundra means 'treeless plain' in
Finnish. The tundra is a biome (a major segment of a particular region having distinctive
vegetation, animals and microorganisms adapted to a unique climate), home to about 1700
kinds of plants, including shrubs, mosses, grasses, lichens and 400 kinds of flowers.

About 50 billion tons of carbon are estimated to be held in a frozen state in the tundra, and
now the tundra is beginning to become a source of carbon dioxide. In the 1970's University of
California biologist Walter Oechel studied carbon dioxide emissions in the tundra, which until
this time had been thought of as a carbon sink. Doing further tests in the 1980's, Oechel
discovered that this was no longer the case, that warming temperatures had changed the
tundra to a net emitter of carbon dioxide. Says Oechel, " We found to our great surprise that the
tundra was already losing carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. So that by the start of these experiments,
which was in 1982, the tundra had already warmed and dried enough, that its historic role as a carbon
sink had reversed and changed. It was now losing carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. That was totally
unexpected."

También podría gustarte