Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
By George Basalla
THE MODEL
Phase 1: The nonscientific society or nation provides a source for European science.
Phase 2: A period of colonial science.
Phase 3: Completes the process of transplantation with a struggle to achieve an
independent scientific tradition (or culture).
IMPERIALISM
Imperialism represented a vent for surplus, a source of strategic raw materials and
foodstuffs, a market for the cotton manufactures of Europe.
“Informal Imperialism” (where an industrial nation brought its political power to
bear upon nominally independent states)
Imperialism may include more than colonialism, with all the result of administration
to the home economy entailed in the latter term.
An “imperialist” is any force acting upon a relatively underdeveloped nation of the
19th century which did not directly arise from the workings of the international
economy per se.
In Irfan Habib’s work, he describes the economy of India during the Mughal
period. Habib stated that the adaptation of new technologies, especially in
agriculture, weren’t hindered by the existing differentiation of peasantry and other
value systems but by insufficient capital and skills needed from the people in such
technologies. He also said that prior to British colonialism, the caste system was
already disintegrating and capitalism and industrialism was rising.
“Drain” and “de-industrialization” are the usual topics of debate in the analysis of
the Indian economy.
“Drain” pertains to the consumption and eventual drain of the resources of
economy from its revenue as they were used mainly for administrative purposes
instead of being used in the continuation of the production. The interests paid in
debts, military charges and civil charges were some of the administrative
responsibilities were the bulk of the gains were used.
“De-industrialization” in India was due to the clinging of the economy to
agriculture rather than manufacturing or other industries. Although their exports
increased, technological diffusion and industrial revolution was prevented in India
because of this.
The first opium war (1840-42) came about when the Chinese authorities
destroyed the opium which were illegally brought and sold in China by the British
traders. This war was won by Britain and China was forced to sign the Treaty of
Nanking (1842). The provisions of the treaty were:
1. Opening of five ports (Canton, Amoy, Foochow, Ningpo, and Shanghai) to British
trade.
2. Renouncing the island of Hong Kong to Great Britain,
3. Payment of war indemnity ($21,000,000), and
4. Enabling all British traders to do business directly with the people.
The second opium war (1856-60) came about when a French missionary was
killed by a Chinese. China lost to the alliance of France and Britain and the Treaties
of Tientsin (1858) and the Peking Convention (1860) were signed with the following
provisions:
1. Cession of the Kowloon peninsula to Great Britain,
2. Foreign diplomats were allowed to reside in Peking,
3. Ten more ports in China were opened to international trade,
4. Foreigners were allowed to wander to any part of China,
5. Christian missionaries were given protection, and
6. The Opium trade was legalized.
China became a vulnerable country and this weakness was taken advantage
by the imperialist powers—Britain, France, Prussia, Denmark, Holland, Spain,
Belgium, Italy and Austria-Hungary. They divided the vast land of China into pieces
of territories called the Spheres of Influence over which the imperialist power has
the exclusive right to exploit the natural resources found in its piece.
The imperialist powers in China until 1895 were Europeans and Americans.
After the loss of China in the Sino-Japanese war (1894-95), the Treaty of
Shimonoseki was signed with the provisions that China would give up its claim in
Korea, paid a war indemnity ($158,000,000), and cession of Formosa, Arthur Port,
and Liaotung Peninsula to Japan. The war also opened China to new imperialist
powers such as Russia. Under the Russian imperialism, the Trans-Siberian railway
was constructed for the following purposes:
1. To promote the economic development of China and other colonies of Russia,
2. To provide easier transportation of Russian troops to its colonies, and
3. To connect Moscow and Vladivostok (“Dominion of the East”).
19th century
- China’s economic retardation
- S. Thomas’ pertinent historiography
- Internal barriers: Confucianism, Emperor system, demographic
trends, officialdom in class structure, firm government
- Foreign intervention: trade patterns, investment, technology
Western Impact
- Positive
- Neutral
- Insignificant
Confucianism
- Political principles taught by Confucius
- A belief, but is not considered a religion since it does not include
devotion to any gods
- China’s social structure
- Educated Chinese comprised the Public Administration
Compradores
- Group of middlemen
- Chinese merchants
Manchu/Ching Dynasty (1644-1911)
- Halted developments were because of increase of land, product
taxes. Famine wreckage, declination of shipping
Economic Backwardness
- Government intervention
Economic Forwardness
- Wealthy merchants
Late 18 century and early 19th century
th
TRANSFER MECHANISMS
The treaty ports, the same as foreign settlements, were said to have played
an important role in the transfer of technology and industrial knowledge from the
foreigners to the Chinese people by providing employment and training grounds. In
fact Shanghai, which is the largest treaty port, was able to establish its Gas
Company, improved waterworks and electric power plant in the late 1800s.
But as a whole, the changes brought about by the ports are small. Aside from
local resistance, the commerce between ports included only raw materials, so there
was little technology transfer. Another was the development of the comprador
system, dominated by the compradores (Chinese merchant and manager of foreign
firms). This slowed down the introduction of Western ideas into the industry. Instead
of being helpful, the treaty ports were looked upon as enemies of the government,
accusing the settlements as refuge for criminals and republicans.
When the designing of the railway linking Shanghai and Soochow was
started, the officials’ delayed aid for the foreigners was due to conflicts in policies.
Fortunately, in 1882, supports for the construction of the railway were improved
after satisfying criteria like employing Chinese labor. Still, the project’s progress
turned out very slow. The effect of the railway in the Chinese economy was little on
the positive side since the foreign capital exerted control over the system.
In conclusion, the small size of the systems established in China was not only
due to the traditional ways of the Chinese, but also the negative effects of the
Western attempt for industrialization.