Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
1 apple sits in the Sun while the other is vacuum packed in the
refrigerator.
After 30 days… the apple left in the Sun will have decomposed at a
faster rate than the apple in the more isolated condition.
1 apple will LOOK younger even though they are the same age. Because
they decomposed at different rates from surrounding or lack of
surrounding influence.
Time/ Reality was not distorted between the 2 apples or the 2 Twins.
Time is Not relative between observers whatsoever.
Time is the same from all frames of reference… and the velocity of light
is dependent upon the velocity of the light source. (meaning, time stays
the same while the speed of light shifts).
NOT that the velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference
and that time dilates.
Einstein said that if other solutions could yield the same conclusions as
relativity… That relativity would not be needed and would eventually
collapse.
Here is one such alternative solution to the Invariance of the Wave.
Invariance of the Wave based from classic Physics and Galilean
transformations.
Yielding the same results without needing relativity, corrections… And
without illusions!
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipN4WxOxuIUjUzRjLyk7ee9QPY7Fgzudf
yJgy_CRzNw6VwKdE04BeE0Y6zWz31ad2A/photo/AF1QipORnXMREDiZK_gLScrf
6ZKLb5OMkm5ycQ-
0HxOA?key=YkdQbFc3YzZqOUFhWVFYdGxfUF9QWU90VlZOUkJ3
∂²φ/∂x² + ∂²φ/∂y² + ∂²φ/∂z² - 1/c² (∂²φ/∂t²) = 0
Thus t’ = t (meaning, time is the same from all frames of reference, not
the velocity of light)
Both the HYPOTHETICAL and ORDINARY OBSERVER would find that the
velocity of the wave being observed is always:
ν'λ'= [ν(1± cv)][λ(1± cv)−1]= νλ = c relative to its MOST primary source.
And
t = t'
c ≠ c'
c' = c ± v
Time is the same from all frames of reference, Not the velocity of light.
Classic Physics vs Relativity
Reality vs Fiction
It's just that the light allows you to see what's going on RIGHT NOW
when you couldn't see before.
The light is simply illuminating the current scenario.
Like turning on a light switch in your own room. Can't see anything in
real time before you turn on the light. But when the light reaches you...
you see everything in real time. Immediately.
Doesn’t matter if the location is lit with a dim red light or a bright blue
light or soft white light, etc.
Classic physics says you will observe the location once that location is
illuminated. And you will observe that location in Real-Time.
Time is the same from ALL frames of reference in Classic Physics.
And if you travel faster than the speed of light, you will just observe a
location in real-time… just that you will be approaching or receding very
quickly.
Because ‘c’ is a constant and not a limit.
And mass does not
fluctuate or increase with velocity.
When we see stars and galaxies, we are NOT looking back in time!
And some of the signals/ radio bursts attributed to distant bodies are
not even coming from those systems at all. They are hearing and
measuring signals that are coming from sources that are long gone.
Since the sources that would have emitted any signals we receive
would extinguish or coordinates drastically changed by the time we
receive them.
So if we look in that particular direction… thinking a signal came from
there… We might detected something from a long time ago yet we are
looking at an existing body in real time. So they think what they are
looking at is creating a given signal.
What they hear and what they see are not necessarily linked. Since
what you see is NOW and what you hear are delayed transmissions.
The discrepancies with Time between distant locations… what we see
in real-time verses a delay in a transmission between those same
locations… those discrepancies cannot be reconciled or explained by
Relativity.
We See distant locations in Real-Time, even though
Relativity says we should be seeing the location as it was in the past.
What we see with our eyes is always Real-Time… but any transmissions
are delayed. Reality itself is Not a transmission. If you were able to see
an astronaut on the surface of mars with your naked eye through a
ground based telescope in your backyard… you could see them hold up
a cue card and read the message in real-time.
You could read the message before the radio transmission arrived 3.03
minutes later if the astronaut recorded and sent the message through
radio. (Which propagates at the speed of light)
So proponents of Relativity are forced to dismiss the argument totally.
And when they are challenged… they get quite angry and label the
argument as “crackpot” or “pseudoscience”, “pet theories”, “fringe”,
“Dunning-Kruger”, “nonsense”, “flat earth” and outstandingly
ridiculous excuses to avoid discussing the data.
No looking into the past due to distance and light and space-time, etc.
The claim that "photons don't experience time" is quackery and untrue.
That is Relativistic nonsense saying that reality itself is experienced by
observers dependent upon the order by which photons hit you.
And if you travel faster (in any direction...) that time will slow down for
you. Because they link time with reality with speed with space with light
with gravity. And none of them are linked at all. (except for Reality/Time...
or Real-Time)