Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Cathy Stuart
115 N. Bridge, Room 103
Victoria, Texas 77901
CASE # 10-3-69863-C
SHIRLEY PERSONS
§ IN THE 267th DISTRICT
PIGOTT M.D., plaintiff
pro se §
v. § COURT OF
§
On September 29, 2007, plaintiff had an encounter with Texas Department of Public
Safety Officers in Wharton County, near Pierce, which resulted in criminal charges
and the physical seizure of the car she had been driving. On or about October 15,
2007, Defendant signed a contract to represent Plaintiff in both the criminal and civil
matters. Defendant agreed in writing to "take care of the felony" and "get your car
back", according to Plaintiff's now deceased husband, Henry Dale Pigott. Plaintiff's
husband, as trustee of a trust for her benefit, paid Defendant $15,000 for work
Attorneys Smith and Eaves were to do pursuant to the Texas Disciplinary Rules of
Professional Conduct.
Plaintiff was originally stopped for speeding 74 mph in a 65 mph zone, well after
dark, at 8:15 PM on the evening in question.
At all times Plaintiff has maintained her innocence, that DPS officers had frightened
her, that she had requested to go to the next lighted populated area, which would
have been Wharton, and having been denied, she had requested the attendance of
another officer she hoped would defuse the situation. The first officer answered,
"Negative", to both requests. When the second officer arrived, she maintained she
was further disconcerted.
Approximately three months after the precipitating event, a new Wharton County
Grand Jury was convened, and with no new evidence, Plaintiff was indicted on two
counts of fleeing arrest with a deadly weapon, the vehicle she was driving, once
from Texas Department of Public Safety Officer Alfred Ochoa, and once from Texas
DPS Officer Daniel Terronez.
In the early morning hours of January 8th or the late evening hours of January 7,
2008, Plaintiff's husband of almost 39 years, Henry Dale Pigott, took his own life.
approximately nine months after the precipitating event, with no new evidence, a
second Wharton County Grand Jury, a different Grand Jury which rendered the first
two indictments, indicted Plaintiff on charges of aggravated assault of a law
enforcement officer, Alfred Ochoa, in the line of duty with a deadly weapon, the car
she was driving. If she had been convicted of this superseding indictment, a first
degree felony, Plaintiff could have been sentenced to 99 years in prison. She was
not notified of the new indictment until several weeks had passed.
On March 13, 2008, Smith filed a motion with the 329th Texas District Court to
withdraw from Plainfitt's defense, based on, he told Judge Randy Clapp, "failure to
communicate". The motion was granted by Judge Clapp.
At her next scheduled hearing, Assistant District Attorney Ross Kurtz again offered
a misdemeanor plea bargain. At the conclusion of the hearing, without comment or
instructions, Plaintiff, who was now pro se, was casually handed and directed to
sign the first degree felony indictment.
At no time did Attorney Smith review the district attorney's evidence file in Plaintiff's
presence. He made no effort to obtain a true and correct copy of the original DPS
video. Plaintiff is aware of evidence that supports a theory of collusion of DPS, the
Texas Medical Board, Judge Randy Clapp's Court Administrator, and others with
with the Wharton County District Attorney for the purpose of harming her which
Attorney Smith did not seek.
Plaintiff will demonstrate that Defendant's failures resulted in significant harm to her
and contributed to the suicide of her husband.
Plaintiff sustained damages due to the causes cited above and and seeks
reparations.
Parties
1. Plaintiff is Shirley Persons Pigott M.D (shirleypigottmd@gmail.com), who is
referred to as "Plaintiff" or “Dr. Pigott”. She resides at and service can be perfected
at 301 Woodway, Victoria, Texas 77904; Phone (361) 894-6464 Cell (361)
652-9474
Conditions Precedent
Causes of Action
Count 1 – Breach of Contract Attorney Smith failed to fulfill the obligations of his
contract, individually, and as a member of the firm Eaves, Smith, and Bauknight.
Count 3 - Abandonment Attorney Smith withdrew from the case two weeks before
the trial was scheduled.
Count 4 - Fraud Attorney Smith gave the reason for his motion to withdraw as
"failure to communicate", when his real reason was that he was asked questions
which would have required him to do his job.
Count 5 - Actions taken in Bad Faith Attorney Smith never intended to try to get
Plaintiff's car back; he never intended to defend her against criminal charges; he
intended to coerce her to agree to guilt.
Count 6 - Unethical Conflict of Interest of both Attorney Smith and Attorney Eaves.
When Plaintiff refused to plea bargain, Attorney Smith's partner, Dexter Eaves,
made an attempt to persuade her to do so, "because we have our reputations to
think about." This was, in fact, a threat to withdraw from her defense if obedience
did not promptly follow, a threat which materialized. Both attorneys placed their own
interests ahead of their client's.
Damages
b. Property damage.
d. Lost earnings.
e. Lost profits.
g. Loss of consortium
h. Damage to reputation
Attorney Fees
Prayer
11. For these reasons, plaintiff asks for judgment against defendant for the
following:
a. Actual damages
d. Punitive Damages.
e. Costs of suit.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________
On this day, Dr. Shirley Persons Pigott M.D. appeared before me, the undersigned
notary public. After I administered an oath to her, upon her oath, she said that she
read the PLAINTIFF ORIGINAL PETITION, AMENDED and that the facts stated in it are
within her personal knowledge and are true and correct.
_________________________
Dr. Shirley Persons Pigott M.D.