Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Recinto de Aguadilla
Programa de Estudios Graduados
José M. Martínez
Mercadeo Genencial
BADM 5090
that if we look at the disparity between the poorest and the rest of the world. That gap is
growing quickly. “So the question is” Can we take some of the caring and innovation power, the
recourses of corporations and get them to focus more on the needs of the poorest? And it’s very
timely because weather there are break troughs in medicine, or using cellular phones in creative
ways, new forms of banking or even food with better nutrition there are clearly some things
that’s these large companies with their great resources and innovation power. If we get them to
apply that more significantly for those with the most needs than we can reduce impoverishment
Gates says, that if you are very poor your voice in the market place is very small, so it’s
like having a disease, just like the one a poor countries have. So you are not going to get a pure
profit driven prioritization. In the same way that something like reducing baldness might,
Bill Gates says, that this disease is being alleviated by young people helping the poorest,
they are associating them self’s with companies taking some of their innovation power and
prioritizing it for these needs. Gates arguments that there are people like C.K Prahald who
pointed out that as you look at the needs of these consumers you often come up with cost break
troughs and you find a higher volume market, so you can sometimes go down this path with it
being purely sort of feeling tropic, brand orientated or just fulfilling the brood mission and see
that it actually dose fit in with the more traditional things way of prioritizing things. I think that’s
great, because I think you should explore the space and you’ll find things that are economic and
want to feel like they’re company really is a positive agent for change, that their company has a
certain type of science that is not just for the richest. This is a very positive instinct that we can
draw on because companies compete to hire those people to have them enthusiastic about the
work they do and so by taking each industry and having literally rankings that show which one is
the being most innovative and looking out for the needs of the poorest. Then will raise the levels
Capitalism over long periods of time has worked better than anyone expected and it’s
easy to lose sight of the fact of that, because we look at individual companies that fail. And yet
the overall total employment over the decades has gone up, so he doesn’t think that there are
many people that would want to set the clock back and say, “They don’t want the break trough
medicine, the empowerment of the internet or the cell phones and all the great things that we
have. Gates says, that people are always worried about imbalances but, that’s it’s partly the
reason why the system works so well. For instance, if there is a shortage of clean energy than the
high IQ people that understand those areas are drawn in. Gates arguments, that energy is a great
example where there are about 20 times as many brilliant people thinking about energy break
troughs today, as there were 10 years ago. So the energy space is a great example of capitalism
and seeing the need drawing in big companies, small companies and funding research
universities. Author says, that all this is happening more in the US, but that now a days it’s more
global than it would have been in the past. So in my personal opinion, capitalism has been the