Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
www.stericycle.com
STC_SMSWP_1109
Table of contents
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Meeting the Challenge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
Study Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
Demographics - who was surveyed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3
Identifying the Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Why Stericycle’s SMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Implementation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Results
Staff Safety - Needlestick Reductions
Staff Response
Environmental Impact
November 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
TM
www.stericycle.com 1
Stericycle’s Sharps Management Service (SMS) using the Bio Systems reusable containers
addresses both of these issues as they relate specifically to needle disposal and Sharps
Injuries (SIs). SIs are a significant occupational risk to all clinicians and support staff within
the hospital care setting. In addition, the disposable sharps containers are defined as
regulated medical waste and must be treated prior to disposal in local landfills - negatively
contributing to the environment. SMS provides protection to hospital staff working with
sharps by decreasing the risk of exposure to potentially hazardous bloodborne pathogens.
Through the use of Stericycle SMS Bio Systems reusable sharps containers, the direct impact
to the environment can be quantified due to a decrease in landfill waste.
2) The influence of the Bio Systems reusable container Breakdown of interviewees are:
on staff, the hospital and the community at large and; 85% of the participants worked in Infection Control,
3) The direct impact of the SMS pro-active change out 11% in Environmental Services (EVS)
of the Bio Systems reusable containers (1/3 – 1/2 full 4% were in Employee Health or Risk Management.
when exchanged) on clinical staff.
The majority of participants, 72% had extensive experience
(over 5 years) in infection control expertise, with 40% of
Hospitals randomly chosen were current users of the Sharps
those having greater than 10 years. Professional titles can
Management Service.
vary from hospital to hospital, but included Director (9),
Manager (24), Practitioner (7) Coordinator (8), Safety Officer
A research tool was developed to address the above areas.
(2), Team leader (1) and Epidemiologist (1). All respondents
Each interview took approximately 20 minutes to complete.
were familiar with the SMS, the Bio Systems Reusable
An independent researcher was engaged to conduct the
Containers, their hospital’s process for measuring SIs and
surveys to ensure all data was obtained in an impartial and
the impact on staff, both clinical and non-clinical.
objective process. All data was consolidated to ensure
confidentiality of the hospital and participant.
10 Midwest Hospitals
(KS,MI,OH,WI)
15 West Hospitals
(CA,CO,AZ) 8 S/SE Hospitals
(TX,FL,TN,KY,SC,NC)
Table 1
Beds # Hospitals Respondents
69 – 100 5
101 – 299 16
300 – 500 15
500 – 699 8
700 – 999 6
> 1000 2
Table 2
# Years Using SMS # % responses
<1 6 11%
1 – 3 years 21 40%
>3 – 5 years 14 27%
>5 – 10 years 5 10%
> 10 years 6 11%
Table 3
Phase 4/5 Needle Sticks # % responses
0 21 40%
0-1 12 23%
2–5 7 13%
>5 1 2%
Unknown 9 17%
No change 2 4%
www.stericycle.com 3
www.stericycle.com 5
1 Beekmann SE, Henderson DK. Protection of healthcare workers from bloodborne pathogens. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2005:18:331-6
2 Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Department of Labor. 29CFR Part 1910.1030, Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens; final rule. Federal Register 1991:56:64004-182.
3 OSHA, Department of Labor, Bloodborne Pathogens and Needlestick Prevention. April 2001. Available at: http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/bloodbornepathogens/standards.html Accessed 04/30/2007.
4 Panlilio AL, Orelien JG, Srivastava PU, Jagger J, Cohn RD, et al. Estimate of the annual number of percutaneous injuries among hospital-based healthcare workers in the United States, 1997-198. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:556-562.
5 Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC). Workbook for Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating a Sharps Injury Prevention Program. February 12, 2004. Available at: Http://www.dcd.gov/sharpssafety/index.html.
6 Garcia R. Time for a new focus on Sharps injury prevention: using procedural period methodology to produce rapid rate reduction {lecture} APIC 33rd Annual Educational Conference & Internal Meeting, June 15, 2006. Tampa, FL