Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Facts: When the common-law spouses suffer from a legal impediment to marry or
Antonio Valdes and Consuelo Gomez were married on Jan. 5, 1971 when they do not live exclusively with each other (as husband and wife), only
In 1992, Valdez sought the declaration of nullity of the marriage in the Quezon the property acquired by both of them through their actual joint contribution of
City RTC, pursuant to Art. 36, FC (mutual psychological incapacity to comply money, property or industry shall be owned in common and in proportion to
with their essential marital obligations) which the trial court granted. their respective contributions. Such contributions and corresponding shares,
Ex-spouses were directed to start proceedings on the liquidation of their however, are prima facie presumed to be equal. The share of any party who is
common properties as defined by Art. 147, FC, and to comply with the married to another shall accrue to the absolute community or conjugal
provisions of Art. 50-52, FC, within 30 days from notice of this decision. partnership, as the case may be, if so existing under a valid marriage. If the
Consuelo Gomez sought a clarification of the direction of compliance with Arts. party who has acted in bad faith is not validly married to another, his or her
50-52 asserting that the FC contained no provisions on the procedure for the share shall be forfeited in the manner already heretofore expressed.
liquidation of common property in "unions without marriage." The rules set up to govern the liquidation of either the absolute community or
Trial court thus clarified that considering that Art. 147 explicitly provides that the conjugal partnership of gains, the property regimes recognized for valid and
the property acquired by both parties during their union, in the absence of voidable marriages (in the latter case until the contract is annulled), are
proof to the contrary, are presumed to have been obtained through the joint irrelevant to the liquidation of the co-ownership that exists between common-
efforts of the parties and will be owned by them in equal shares, ex-spouses law spouses.
will own their family home and all their properties for that matter in equal In all other cases, it is not to be assumed that the law has also meant to have
shares. coincident property relations, on the one hand, between spouses in valid and
In the liquidation and partition of properties owned in common by the ex- voidable marriages (before annulment) and, on the other, between common-
spouses, the provisions on ownership found in the CC shall apply. And on the law spouses or spouses of void marriages, leaving to ordain, on the latter case,
issue of disposing the family dwelling, considering that this Court has already the ordinary rules on co-ownership subject to the provisions of the Family Code
declared the marriage as null and void ab initio, pursuant to Art. 147, the on the "family home," i.e., the provisions found in Title V, Chapter 2, of the
property regime of petitioner and respondent shall be governed by the rules on Family Code, remain in force and effect regardless of the property regime of the
ownership and provisions of Arts. 102 and 129 of the FC finds no application. spouses.
Petitioner’s MFR was denied and in his recourse to the SC, he submits that Art. Note: Might wanna check out difference bet. Art. 147 and 144, p. 228.
50-52 should be controlling
Carino vs. Carino [February 2, 2001]
Issue: WON provisions Arr. 50-52 are controlling Petition for review on certiorari of a decision of the Court of Appeals
Facts:
SPO4 Santiago Carino contracted two marriages the first was on June 20 1969 marriage license. In Republic v. Court of Appeals, the Court held that such a
with Susan Nicdao with whom he had two children. The second was on certification is adequate to prove the non-issuance of a marriage license.
November 10, 1992 with Susan Yee. Presumed validity of the marriage of Nicdao was sufficiently overcome
November 23, 1992 – he passed away under the care of Susan Yee. She paid
for medical and burial expense.
Article 40 of the Family Code, for purposes of remarriage, there must first be
a prior judicial declaration of the nullity of a previous marriage, though void,
Yee and Nicdao both filed claims for monetary benefits and financial. Nicdao
before a party can enter into a second marriage, otherwise, the second
was able to collect P146,000 from MBAI, PCCIU, Commutation, NAPOLCOM and
marriage would also be void. The nullity of the marriage of Nicdao with the
Pag-ibig. Yee was able to collect P21,000 from GSIS Life, GSIS burial, SSS
deceased does not validate the marriage of Yee because their marriage was
burial
solemnized without a judicial decree declaring the 1st marriage void.
December 14, 1993 – Yee filed a case for collection of sum of money against Two marriages are void and as such the applicable property regime is
Nicdao praying that the latter be ordered to return to her at least one-half of governed by provisions of Articles 147 and 148 of the Family Code on
the one hundred forty-six thousand pesos (P146,000.00) collectively “Property Regime of Unions Without Marriage.”
denominated as “death benefits” Article 148 of the Family Code refers to the property regime of bigamous
Nicdao failed to file her answer and the trial court declared her in default. marriages, adulterous relationships, relationships in a state of concubine,
Yee admitted that relationships where both man and woman are married to other persons,
i. her marriage to the deceased took place during the subsistence of, and multiple alliances of the same married man – Only the properties acquired by
without first obtaining a judicial declaration of nullity of, the marriage both of the parties through their actual joint contribution of money, property,
between petitioner and the deceased or industry shall be owned by them in common in proportion to their
ii. She claims that she had no knowledge of the previous marriage and that respective contributions
she became aware of it only at the funeral of the deceased, where she met Actual joint contribution shall belong to the co-ownership. Wages and
petitioner who introduced herself as the wife of the deceased. salaries earned by each party belong to him or her exclusively. Contributions
iii. She contends that the marriage of Nicdao and the deceased was void an in the form of care of the home, children and household, or spiritual or moral
initio because it was solemnized without the required marriage license. inspiration, are excluded in this regime
The marriage certificate bears no marriage license number and she Marriage of Yee and the deceased is a bigamous marriage and as such article
presented a certification dated Marc 9, 1994 from the Local Civil Registrar 148 of the FC is applicable.
that states that no record of marriage license of the deceased and Nicdao. The P146,000 are renumerations, incentives and benefits from governmental
Trial court ruled in favor of Yee agencies earned by the deceased as a police officer. It could not be said that
Nicdao filed an appeal with the CoA but the decision of the trial court was Yee contributed money, property or industry in the acquisition of the
affirmed. monetary benefits
Intestate succession the death benefits shall pass to his legal heirs.
Issues: 2.
1. WON article 148 is applicable to the marriage of the deceased with Yee. YES Article 147 of the Family Code governs unions of parties who are legally
2. WON article 147 is applicable to the marriage of the deceased with Nicdao. YES capacitated and not barred by any impediment to contract marriage, but
whose marriage is nonetheless void for other reasons, like the absence of a
Ratio: marriage license
1. Under Article 147 wages and salaries earned by either party during the
Article 40 of the Family Code, the absolute nullity of a previous marriage may cohabitation shall be owned by the parties in equal shares and will be divided
be invoked for purposes of remarriage on the basis solely of a final judgment equally between them, even if only one party earned the wages and the
declaring such previous marriage void. other did not contribute thereto.
For purposes other than remarriage, no judicial action is necessary to declare Wages and salaries earned by either party during the cohabitation shall be
a marriage an absolute nullity. owned by the parties in equal shares and will be divided equally between
them, even if only one party earned the wages and the other did not
Under the CC valid marriage license is a requisite of marriage, and the
contribute thereto
absence thereof, subject to certain exceptions, renders the marriage void ab
initio.
The marriage of Nicdao and the deceased does not fall within the marriages
exempt from the license requirement. A marriage license, therefore, was
indispensable to the validity of their marriage. This notwithstanding, the
records reveal that the marriage contract of petitioner and the deceased
bears no marriage license number and, as certified by the Local Civil
Registrar of San Juan, Metro Manila, their office has no record of such