Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Introduction
The concept of producing bioethanol from Mangifera indica peelings came from
the notion that Mangifera indica peelings have considerable amounts of glucose. This
proves that Mangifera indica peelings can be a potential source of bioethanol since the
sugar found in its cellulosic material is the chief raw material of bioethanol production.
shows that simultaneous saccharification and fermentation produced the greatest yield
of ethanol from Alfalfa fiber fractions. Results further show that said simultaneous
bioethanol. This study looks into the feasibility of producing greater yield of ethanol from
process. While preliminary studies have been conducted researching the extraction of
bioethanol from various root crops, cellulosic material and algae, none have specifically
The world is currently undergoing an oil crisis. Due to our continuous annual oil
consumption, our reserves are quickly being depleted, with scientists predicting that at
our current rate of consumption, in just 40 years, our entire fossil fuel supply will run
completely out. However, oil consumption rates are increasing rather than decreasing,
increases the trace gas concentration in the atmosphere and causes significant
Millions of tons of garbage are being thrown away by Filipinos each year, and the
accumulated waste takes up valuable real estate and is a source of land pollution.
commercial value, and are therefore merely thrown away, contributing to the
This study aims to utilize Mangifera indica peelings as a raw material to obtain
The study aims to extract bioethanol from Mangifera indica peelings through the
terms of the buffer levels and length of the fermentation time are made, then
Hypotheses
a) Alternative Hypotheses
b) Null Hypotheses
If the mangifera indica peelings are subjected to the simultaneous
The world is currently undergoing an oil crisis. However, oil consumption rates
are increasing rather than decreasing, thereby using up even more of this finite
therefore significantly contributing to the reduction of both the Philippines’s total waste
Assumption
The Mangifera indica peelings are rich in cellulosic ethanol. This research
indica peelings as a source of bioethanol. Other products that Mangifera indica peelings
This chapter contains the different related literature and related studies that the
Philippine Mangoes
Philippine mango (the national fruit) is known worldwide as the best tasting
variety of Carabao mangoes in the world. Philippine mangoes have a distinct rich taste,
no turpentine taste, not fibrous and high nutritional value compared to other cultivars.
Philippine carabao mangoes are available year-round but the best tasting fruits are
Pico originated from India, Burma and Malaya. Smaller than the carabao variety.
Kidney shaped with round apex and base, which is more, flattened. Light yellow orange
when ripe, thick and tough. Has fibrous orange to yellow orange flesh. Sweeter than the
Bioethanol
The principle fuel used as a petrol substitute for road transport vehicles is
steam.
The main sources of sugar required to produce ethanol come from fuel or energy
crops. These crops are grown specifically for energy use and include corn, maize and
wheat crops, waste straw, willow and popular trees, sawdust, reed canary grass, cord
grasses, jerusalem artichoke, myscanthus and sorghum plants. There is also ongoing
research and development into the use of municipal solid wastes to produce ethanol
fuel.
biodegradable, low in toxicity and causes little environmental pollution if spilt. Ethanol
burns to produce carbon dioxide and water. Ethanol is a high octane fuel and has
can also oxygenate the fuel mixture so it burns more completely and reduces polluting
emissions. The most common blend is 10% ethanol and 90% petrol (E10). Vehicle
engines require no modifications to run on E10 and vehicle warranties are unaffected
also. Only flexible fuel vehicles can run on up to 85% ethanol and 15% petrol blends
(E85).
renewable resource i.e. crops and not from a finite resource and the crops it derives
from can grow well in the UK (like cereals, sugar beet and maize). Another benefit over
fossil fuels is the greenhouse gas emissions. The road transport network accounts for
22% of all greenhouse gas emissions and through the use of bioethanol, some of these
emissions will be reduced as the fuel crops absorb the CO2 they emit through growing.
Also, blending bioethanol with petrol will help extend the life of the UK’s diminishing oil
supplies and ensure greater fuel security, avoiding heavy reliance on oil producing
nations. By encouraging bioethanol’s use, the rural economy would also receive a boost
from growing the necessary crops. Bioethanol is also biodegradable and far less toxic
that fossil fuels. In addition, by using bioethanol in older engines can help reduce the
amount of carbon monoxide produced by the vehicle thus improving air quality. Another
advantage of bioethanol is the ease with which it can be easily integrated into the
existing road transport fuel system. In quantities up to 5%, bioethanol can be blended
with conventional fuel without the need of engine modifications. Bioethanol is produced
using familiar methods, such as fermentation, and it can be distributed using the same
Bioethanol Production
Ethanol can be produced from biomass by the hydrolysis and sugar fermentation
the plant cell walls known as cellulose, hemi cellulose and lignin. In order to produce
sugars from the biomass, the biomass is pre-treated with acids or enzymes in order to
reduce the size of the feedstock and to open up the plant structure. The cellulose and
the hemi cellulose portions are broken down (hydrolysed) by enzymes or dilute acids
into sucrose sugar that is then fermented into ethanol. The lignin which is also present
in the biomass is normally used as a fuel for the ethanol production plants boilers. There
are three principle methods of extracting sugars from biomass. These are concentrated
The hydrolysis process breaks down the cellulostic part of the biomass or corn
into sugar solutions that can then be fermented into ethanol. Yeast is added to the
solution, which is then heated. The yeast contains an enzyme called invertase, which
acts as a catalyst and helps to convert the sucrose sugars into glucose and fructose
(both C6H12O6).
The fructose and glucose sugars then react with another enzyme called zymase,
which is also contained in the yeast to produce ethanol and carbon dioxide. The
fermentation process takes around three days to complete and is carried out at a
Saccharomyces when translated means “sugar fungus”. That is what this yeast
uses for food. They are found in the wild growing on the skins of grapes and other fruits.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is in the fungi kingdom. The reasons for this classification
are because it has a cell wall made of chitin, it has no peptiodglycan in its cell walls, and
its lipids are ester linked. It also uses DNA template for protein synthesis and it has
fact that they are able break down their food through both aerobic respiration and
period. Another adaptation they have is their ability to have both sexual and asexual
reproduction. Very few other Ascomycota can do both processes. And very few
organisms can do all four of these processes. This allows this species to live in many
In asexual reproduction the haploid of the yeast under goes mitosis and forms more
haploid yeasts. There is an a and ά strain of these haploids. Then these haploid yeasts,
one from each strain, can fuse together and become on cell. Then the nuclei of both cell
fuses together and this cell is now the zygote. These diploid cells can go through
mitosis, which they call budding, and four more zygotes or they can undergo meiosis
and from an ascus which will split into four ascospores. These haploids can then
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is one of the most important fungi in the history of the
world. This yeast is responsible for the production of ethanol in alcoholic drinks and is
the reasons your mother’s bread dough rises in the pan. That is where the names
brewer’s and baker’s yeast come from. The process in which it produces ethanol is one
way this yeast converts glucose into energy. There are two ways Saccharomyces
cerevisiae breaks down glucose. One way is through aerobic respiration. This process
requires the presence of oxygen. When oxygen is not present the yeast will then go
through anaerobic fermentation. The net result of this is two ATP, and it also produces
two by products; carbon dioxide and ethanol. So if this yeast is allowed to grow in a
container lacking oxygen it will produce ethanol (alcohol). Humans have been isolating
this process since the beginning of history. The yeast helps in the rising of bread with
it’s other by-product carbon dioxide. The gas that is produce inside the dough causes it
to rise and expand. Both of these processes use the haploid of this yeast for this
process. In industry they isolate one strain, either a or ά, of the haploid to keep them
from undergoing mating. (Madigan, 457) In the baker’s yeast they have a strain were
the production of carbon dioxide is more prevalent then ethanol and vice versa for
Ethanol fermentation
process in which sugars such as glucose, fructose, and sucrose are converted into
cellular energy and thereby produces ethanol and carbon dioxide as metabolic waste
products. Because yeasts perform this process in the absence of oxygen, ethanol
of alcoholic beverages and ethanol fuel, and in the rising of bread dough.
Saccharification
This work describes ethanol production from alfalfa fiber using separate
(SSF) with and without liquid hot water (LHW) pretreatment. Candida shehatae FPL-702
produced 5 and 6.4 g/l ethanol with a yield of 0.25 and 0.16 g ethanol/g sugar
respectively by SHF and SSF from alfalfa fiber without pretreatment. With LHW
pretreatment using SSF, C. shehatae FPL-702 produced 18.0 g/l ethanol, a yield of 0.45
g ethanol/g sugar from cellulosic solids or ‘raffinate’. Using SHF, it produced 9.6 g/l
ethanol, a yield of 0.47 g ethanol/g sugar from raffinate. However, the soluble extract
fraction containing hemicelluloses was poorly fermented in both SHF and SSF due to
the presence of inhibitors. Addition of dilute acid during LHW pretreatment of alfalfa
fiber resulted in fractions that were poorly saccharified and fermented. These results
show that unpretreated alfalfa fiber produced a lower ethanol yield. Although LHW
pretreatment can increase ethanol production from raffinate fiber fractions, it does not
Research Methodology
This chapter contains the materials and procedures used for extraction of bioethanol from
the two varieties of Mangifera indica peelings through simultaneous saccharification and
fermentation using the Saccharomyces cerevisiae
One hundred seventy grams of each of the variety of Mangifera indica peelings (carabo
and piko) was used for the total sugar determination and for simultaneous saccharafication and
fermentation. One hundred mL of Glucose-Yeast-Peptone, 20 grams of glucose and 10 grams of
peptone in 1L of distilled water were used in dilution. Five mL suspension of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae was used for the saccharafication. Twenty five grams of powdered cellulose and
xylanase were diluted in 200 mL of sodium hydroxide (NaOH).
Blender was used to make the Mangifera indica peelings susceptible to enzyme attack.
Eight flasks were used to be a container of the samples.
Research Design
The Fermentation Time of Mangifera indica
SIMULTANEOUS
SACCHARIFICATION LEVEL OF BUFFER (mL)
AND
FERMENTATION
50.0 mL 100.0 mL
TIME (hours) 150 mL
A% of B% of A% of B% of A% of B% of
Time A the the the the the the
50mL 50mL 100mL 100mL 100mL 100mL
A% of B% of A% of B% of A% of B% of
Time B the the the the the the
50mL 50mL 100mL 100mL 100mL 100mL
Dependent Variables:
Level of buffer (mL) in 50 mL
Level of buffer (mL) in 100 mL
Independent Variable:
Fermentation time A
Fermentation time B
Extraneous Variables:
2 Varieties of mango, specifically carabao and piko
Procedure
Waste peelings were collected from Mangifera indicas. These were then ground into pulp
using a blender, placed in a sterile container, and stored for the subsequent sugar concentration
analysis.
The container was then labelled for identification in preparation for the total sugar
determination. Fifty grams of the pulp was subjected to automatic chemical analysis of its total
sugar content. The test determined that the glucose content of the Mangifera indica peelings was
suitable for saccharification and fermentation.
Having determined the glucose content of the peelings to be used for simultaneous
saccharification and fermentation process, 120g of peelings were cut into smaller particles and
ground into pulp for fifteen minutes using a blender to make the samples more susceptible to
enzyme attack.
Two- 100mL flasks of Glucose-Yeast-Peptone (GYP) medium were prepared by diluting
20 grams of glucose and 10 grams of peptone in 1L of distilled water and sterilized for 20
minutes at 121˚C.
Five mL suspension of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain was obtained and inoculated into
the prepared broth. The broth was then incubated at room temperature on a rotary shaker at 200
rpm for 24 hours before inoculation into the fermentation medium.
Twenty-five grams of powdered cellulase and xylanase enzymes were weighed and
transferred into two separate flasks. Each was diluted with 200mL of prepared sodium hydroxide
(NaOH) buffer. Each flask was vigorously shaken through mechanical means for thorough
incorporation of the enzyme with the liquid buffer.
Eight flasks were used for the experiment and labeled depending on the type of
simultaneous saccharification and fermentation manipulation they would undergo. The flasks
were then divided into two groups, A and B. Each subgroup is composed of four flasks each,
containing 15g of pulp per flask. Fifty mL of prepared 2.0% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) buffer
were distributed to each flask of group A, and 100mL of the same buffer were distributed to each
flask of group B. Groups A and B were inoculated with 5mL of cellulase and xylanase solution
and 5mL suspension of yeast cells.
The first two flasks of the first group, labelled A1, were allowed to ferment for 24 hours,
while the second pair of flasks from the same group, labelled A2, was allowed to ferment for 72
hours.
Likewise, the first two flasks of the second group, labelled B1, were allowed to ferment
for 24 hours, while the second pair of flasks of the same group, labelled B 2, was allowed to
ferment for 72 hours.
Bioethanol evaporation was prevented and aerobic conditions were maintained by placing
cotton plugs on all flasks. After their respective fermentation times, the pulp broth was filtered
through ordinary filter paper, and the filtrate of each flask was immediately submitted for
chemical analysis.
All the filtrates of the flasks of the two groups were sent for chemical analysis to
determine the bioethanol content of the liquid filtrate determined through gas chromatography.
Samples of each liquid filtrate in each of the flasks were loaded to the gas chromatogram for
chemical analysis, and the results of the test were recorded and analyzed.