Friends,
 
After centuries of warfare in which secrecy and espionage often made the difference between
winning and losing, we should be grateful that our current enemy has published–and then
repeatedly called attention to his battle plan. Well I guess this begs the question; why did we not
do this when we read Mein Kampf which is nothing more than a German version of the Quran!
Be that as it may!
The only problem is…our senior leadership refuses to read it or if they have read it, they refuse
to acknowledge what therein lies!
Below I have reprinted the remarks of Stephen Coughlin. For those of you who are not familiar
with Mr. Coughlin I will briefly summarize.  Stephen Coughlin was a senior Islamic advisor in
the Pentagon to the military. He wrote a White Paper outlining the Islamic problem and pointing
out that if we did not understand who and what we were exactly up against we could never win
this war. For that effort Mr. Coughlin was cashiered from is advisory job at the Pentagon, a
victim of pressure from C.A.I.R and so-called “Islamic” advisors within the Pentagon. These
‘Islamic” advisors might better be described as “spies” and “traitors” put in place by Islamic
sympathizers and the overt Muslim sympathizer who presently resides in the White House.
Might I remind you of this Cicero quote, one which is completely applicable in today’s America:

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An
enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor
moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the
very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his
victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the
hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine
the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.
The traitor is the plague.”

But alas…political correctness, multiculturalism and America bashing trumps all semblance of rational
discourse.

If you remember only two things remember these two things…think about them, mull them over in your
mind then use your conclusions to judge all that you see going on in America…I think the picture will
terrify you…it should, this war Islam wages is not a war for territory but a WAR OF CIVILIZATIONS  …theirs
or ours!

Blared from every Mosque in the Middle East and many in America!

SATURDAY FIRST

SUNDAY NEXT

DEATH TO AMERICA
 And from the Muslim Brotherhood:

“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan
(Brotherhood) must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and
destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and
the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other
religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared
ourselves for Jihad yet.”

How about that… let’s see!

‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers” Let me substitute a
few words in this sentence which in no way will change the meaning and may help clarify the intent of
the passage.

How about; ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by the “hands of a compliant and malleable MSM, an
ignorant and sympathizing academia and a deliberate and empathizing Marxist/Muslim regime in
Washington”…MAKE SENSE NOW?

 Stephen Coughlin speaking at the: Strategic Engagement Group (SEG).

 Whether it is through violence or deceit and subversion, Islamic law provides both the strategic
blueprint and the justification for war against the West. And the West’s refusal to read the
Quranic literature and accept the religious motivation behind Islamic terrorism, instead opting
for a politically correct view that they cannot accurately interpret Islam, has resulted in a
“complete epistemic collapse,” according to SEG’s vice president of strategic communication
initiatives, Stephen Coughlin.
The enemy “is who he says he is,” Coughlin said, adding that everyone–including Islamic
terrorists themselves–refer to such fighters as jihadis. “There’s no question that the enemy we are
fighting considers himself a jihadi.”
And jihad, as explained by 14th century Islamic scholar Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri, “means to
wage war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada,
signifying warfare to establish the religion.”
He asked if someone could be both politically correct and threat-focused? The answer seems to
be a clear no.
As explained by Mohammad Hashim Kamali in Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence:
“Sovereignty in Islam is the prerogative of Almighty Allah alone… . It is neither the will of the
ruler nor of any assembly of men, nor even the community as a whole, that determines the values
and the laws which uphold those values.”
Such principles make Islamic law incompatible with democracy, Coughlin explained, or even
recognizing the sovereign power of the law of the land, the way Christian law and Jewish
halakha do.
When Coughlin speaks about Islam, he often puts the word moderate in quotes. That’s because
even those considered moderate, such as Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf–spiritual leader of the
“Ground Zero” mosque–believe in the primacy of shariah law. Rauf himself wrote that since
“Shariah is understood as a law with God at its center, it is not possible in principle to limit the
Shariah to some aspects of human life and leave out others.”
Coughlin noted that some of our Arab allies, such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt, have constitutions
based on Islamic law. And pointing to The Quranic Concept of War, by Pakistani Gen. S. K.
Malik, Coughlin said the enemy’s threat doctrine is based on Islamic law, and there is no way to
defeat an enemy without explicitly understanding its threat doctrine.
“I’m not asking you to read something al-Qaeda wrote. I’m asking you to read something our
coalition partners wrote,” Coughlin said.
The other element to the threat doctrine is the Quranic concept of taqiya, or misleading the
enemy. Coughlin showed a letter signed by about 40 Muslim leaders disapproving of an Islamic
“day of violence” in response to comments made by the pope criticizing religious violence. The
letter was intended for Western ears, and its audience happily accepted it, despite the fact that
when Islamic leaders speak to Muslim audiences, they encourage the Quranic concept of war.
“That’s the gold standard,” Coughlin said, holding up the Pakistani text on jihad. Then he held
up the open letter to the West: “This is the you’re-going-to-lose-the-war standard.”
The reason Muslim leaders can denounce “terrorism” while still supporting it, Coughlin
explained, is that terrorism is not defined in Muslim parlance the same way it is in the Western
lexicon. Again quoting al-Misri: “The following are not subject to retaliation: … (2) a Muslim
for killing a non-Muslim.” Leaders of the Muslim world will condemn “terrorism”–meaning the
killing of a Muslim, or in some cases a tourist, which is why they often say they condemn
“terrorism and the killing of innocents.”
Coughlin then introduced the Islamic concept of abrogation (progressive revelation), which holds
that the latest version of Islamic law supersedes all others. He quoted from Islamic
Jurisprudence, by Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee:
“The law was laid down in the period of the Prophet (peace be unto him) gradually and in stages.
The aim was to bring a society steeped in immorality to observe the highest standards of
morality. This could not be done abruptly. It was done in stages, and doing so necessitated repeal
and abrogation of certain laws.”
When put in order, the Medinan period is the latest period in which the Quran is ordered. And
the last part of the Medinan Quran that talks about jihad (making it the final word on the subject)
says: “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath
been forbidden by Allah and His Apostle, nor acknowledge the religion of truth, even if they are
of the people of the Book, until they pay the jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.”
John Guandolo, vice president of strategic planning and execution for SEG, delved more into the
concept of taqiya, pointing out the infiltration into major sectors of local and federal
governments by the umbrella Islamist network, the Muslim Brotherhood.
“Deception is not a tactic for these guys, it’s the whole game,” Guandolo said.
He went on to demonstrate this by showing a photo of the Brotherhood’s Sheikh Kifah Mustapha
among the graduates of a recent FBI Citizens’ Academy, which takes its participants inside the
FBI’s investigation and community relations processes. He showed a video of Anwar al-Awlaki,
an American-born top terrorist recruiter for al-Qaeda now based in Yemen, leading a prayer
service on Capitol Hill. Guandolo pointed out that Abdurahman Alamoudi–who in 2004 pled
guilty to illegal financial transactions with the Libyan government and to participating in a plot
to assassinate Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah–was in charge of selecting Muslim chaplains for the
U.S. military. These are just a few of many examples, he said.
“They’re actually inside our decision making group,” Guandolo said, adding that decades of
Soviet subversion in the U.S. laid the groundwork for radical Islam’s taqiya campaign.
But far from accusing lawmakers of knowingly collaborating with the enemy, Guandolo made
clear that he believes political leaders don’t know the backgrounds of many of the people they
meet with, often relying on “moderate” Muslim staffers to make the introductions. This makes
counterterrorism efforts on this front virtually nonexistent.
“Not only are we not countering it, we don’t know that it’s going on,” Guandolo said.
When the media report on a “lone wolf” attack, Guandolo said, they attempt to paint each
Islamic terrorist as a sort of rebellious one-man breakaway movement. But what do all these lone
wolves have in common? They all cite Islamic law as the justification and inspiration of their
acts.
When law enforcement or government officials classify jihad as some kind of “internal yoga,”
Guandolo said, groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) sit back, smile,
shake their heads and say “still stupid. Still haven’t cracked a book.”
CAIR was founded in 1994 ostensibly to defend American Muslims from what it sees as
discrimination. But the organization was born after two of its co-founders, Omar Ahmad and
Nihad Awad, attended a meeting in 1993 called by members of the Hamas terror outfit. The FBI
investigation of the meeting showed it to be a strategy session on how to undermine the Mideast
peace process and support jihadist activity against the West.
Even more troubling, Guandolo said, is the extent to which the Muslim Brotherhood–global
Islamist movement and father of Hamas–controls the Muslim community’s access to American
politicians. And there need be no guessing as to the Brotherhood’s intentions; any visitor to the
organization’s Web site can find, in English, “the principles of the Muslim Brotherhood”:
“1-The introduction of the Islamic Shari’ah as the basis controlling the affairs of state and
society.
2-Work to achieve unification among the Islamic countries and states, mainly among the Arab
states, and liberating them from foreign imperialism.”
Put simply, they intend to establish Islamic law and re-establish the caliphate. In 2004, the FBI
discovered a Brotherhood memorandum that laid out the “strategic goals” of the organization.
The most infamous paragraph is the following:
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The
Ikhwan (Brotherhood) must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in
eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable
house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is
made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to
this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet.”
When Western leaders put political correctness ahead of security, Guandolo said, the
Brotherhood has succeeded in furthering its “civilization-jihadist” goals “by their hands.” This is
difficult for political leaders to accept, because it would acknowledge just how far this type of
jihad has advanced. But that understanding, Guandolo said, is crucial to establishing a strategy to
counter it:
“There’s a doctrine here that is airtight that the enemy says he’s fighting for, and we have yet to
look at it. We know that because of the level of penetration that this amounts to an insurgency.”
http://theamericanjingoist.net/