Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
© RegSol 2019
Session Agenda
✓ Introduction
✓ What is the MLRO?
✓ Who should be the MLRO?
✓ MLRO Role: What should the MLRO Do?
✓ How does the MLRO do it:
Human wit vs technology
✓ Why does the MLRO do it: detection of red flags
✓ Questions?
© RegSol 2018 2
RegSol Compliance Service Solutions
Combining over 20 years of consultancy experience:
Consultancy Training
▪ Multi-disciplinary onsite reviews ▪ In-person (either inhouse or
▪ Policies and Procedures offsite)
▪ Risk Management ▪ Self-paced online
▪ DPO Services (Data Protection ▪ Instructor-led Webinars
Officer)
Regulatory Solutions Areas of Expertise
▪ Authorisations (e.g. CBI) AML/CTF
▪ Regulator visit preparation Data Protection (GDPR)
▪ Client Interaction Consumer Protection
© RegSol 2018 Insurance Distribution Regulations
3
What is the MLRO?
▪ Fined €280,000
Breaches:
▪ Failed to include Terrorist Financing in
Risk Assessment;
▪ Inadequate policies and procedures;
▪ Failed to provide its staff with
appropriate STR training;
▪ Transaction Monitoring: Placed too
much reliance on personal knowledge
of customer;
▪ Third party reliance inadequate
5
© RegSol 2019
Who should be the MLRO?
Fit, Proper And….?
▪ Seniority: Influence, authority and experience
▪ Expertise, knowledge and right skillset: know the regulations, understand the risks
▪ Adequately Resourced
© RegSol 2019 6
MLRO Expertise: Know the law
2015
2005 2010 2012 • 4th EU AML
• 3rd EU AML • Criminal Justice ● FATF Directive
(25.06.2015)
Directive Recommenda
(ML & TF) Act
• Criminal Justice 2010
tions 2012 2016
Act 1994 2013 • European Union
• Criminal Justice ● Criminal (AML: Beneficial
(Terrorist Justice Act Ownership of
Offences) Act, 2013 Corporate
2005
Entities) Regs
2016
7
MLRO Expertise: Know the law
2017 2019
● 2018 contd.. 2020
●
FATF Mutual
Evaluation report:
● EU (AML:
● 5th EU AML
Beneficial
Ireland Directive
Ownership)
2018 ● Criminal Justice
Regs 2019
transposed by
(ML & TF) 10.01.2020
● 5th EU AML (Amendment) ● Criminal Justice ● 6th EU AML
Directive Act 2018 (ML and TF) Directive into
● (Amendment)
Criminal Justice ● 6th EU AML
Bill 2019.
national law by
(Corruption Offences) Directive 3.12.2020.
Act
8
MLRO regulatory updates: 2018 Act
▪ 4th EU AML Directive Changes:
▪ Statutory obligation to carry out Business Risk Assessment
▪ Simplified Due Diligence “rules based approach” effectively
Abolished
▪ Enhanced CDD regime: domestic PEPs and Higher risk country
accounts
▪ Countries of Equivalence List Abolished
CJ(ML&TF)(Amend.) Act 2018 was signed into law in November 2018
Consolidated version of the 2010 Act is available here:
http://revisedacts.lawreform.ie/eli/2010/act/6/revised/en/html
9
© RegSol 2019
MLRO Regulatory Updates: 5th Directive
© RegSol 2019
MLRO Regulatory Updates: 6th Directive
© RegSol 2019
s.7 – Understand the Offence of Money Laundering
12
© RegSol 2019
s.13– Understand the Offence of Terrorist Financing
13
© RegSol 2019
Knowledge of AML Media trends:
14
© RegSol 2019
Knowledge of AML Media Trends
15
© RegSol 2019
MLRO Role: What should the MLRO DO?
What are the Central Banks
Expectations?
▪ Governance structures : clear roles & reporting line
to Committee/Board
▪ MLRO role clearly defined and documented;
➢Where an MLRO has not been appointed by the firm, the Central Bank may, under
Section 54 (8), direct the firm to do so.
© RegSol 2019 17
How does the MLRO
Do it?
Human Wit? Technology?
● Board
● Risk Assessment ● Risk Assessment
● Policies ● Record Keeping
● Record Keeping ● Ongoing Monitoring
Training ● Training
● Ongoing Monitoring
● Outsourcing
18
MLRO Duties: MLRO Board Report
▪ Why? The firm's senior management consider the report; and they
take any necessary action to remedy deficiencies identified by the
report.
© RegSol 2019 19
MLRO Duties -Risk Assessment: Legal Obligation
20
© RegSol 2019
MLRO Duties: Risk Assessment
FAILURE = OFFENCE
21
© RegSol 2019
MLRO Duties: Policies & Procedures
MLRO oversight in Partnership with
Business Heads?
● Maintain a detailed suite of AML/CFT policies,
supplemented by guidance and supporting procedures
to demonstrate compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements;
adhered to;
● Independent review and testing.
MLRO Duties: Training
The Law
Section 54 (6) requires designated persons to ensure staff are instructed on ML/TF
law and provided with ongoing training OFFENCE for failures to
comply
Main CBI Findings?
● Failure to demonstrate effective monitoring Plan in
place to verify all staff are trained:
○ Board
○ Senior Management
○ High Risk Staff
○ New Starters (induction)
(completion log)
MLRO Duties: Training Checklist
© RegSol 2019
MLRO Duties: Record Keeping
25
© RegSol 2019
MLRO Duties: Ongoing Monitoring
Key Areas? Monitoring and rationale for setting thresholds
27
Ongoing Monitoring Triggers Events:
Non-transactional trigger events:
• Material change in ownership and/or management structure;
• Re-classification of the jurisdiction where the respondent institution is located;
Identification of a PEP relationship;
• Identification of adverse media on the respondent institution.
29
Financial Sanctions Regime
Legal obligations:
● Freeze all funds and economic resources of persons and entities on sanctions
lists
● Report to the relevant competent authority (the Central Bank of Ireland) in
respect of financial sanctions matches and any freezing of accounts or
transactions*
*In the event that a customer is matched to either the EU terrorist lists or UN terrorist lists, MLRO should file an
STR immediately with the Financial Intelligence Unit in the Garda National Economic Crime Bureau and not
carry out any service or transaction in respect of the account until the report has been made.
30
© RegSol 2019
Financial Sanctions
Frequency of Screening and Investigation/Escalation:
▪ Designated senior person/MLRO responsibility for Sanctions investigation
and Escalation
▪ Include in BRA
▪ Beware of processing USD transactions- OFAC US sanctions apply
▪ Screening system appropriate to size, scale and complexity
▪ Screening new customers, their transactions/payments, beneficial owners
at onboarding and then on a regular basis
▪ Determine procedures for matches, false positives, investigation and
reporting to MLRO
© RegSol 2018 31
Suspicious Activity Reporting: Legal Obligation
S.41 & s.42 CJ, S. 54 (3)(ML&TFO) ACT 2010 as amended
▪ You MUST report to the Gardai and Revenue Commissioners ‘As soon
as Practicable’ where you:
32
© RegSol 2019
Internal Controls for STRs/SARs
Timing:
➔“As soon as practicable”- Delays in reporting a suspicions may
result in the loss of evidence and assist the person who is alleged to
have committed the offence
MLRO Controls:
➔Maintain Internal SAR/STR Register or log & evidence/rationale of
reporting/investigation process
➔Internal SAR/STR Form/procedures available to all staff
➔SAR/STR Training for all staff
➔Consider automated transaction monitoring systems to identify Red
Flags
33
© RegSol 2019
Suspicious Activity/Transaction Reporting: goAML
● Section 42 of the CJA 2010, provides that reports in relation to money
laundering and terrorist financing suspicions should be made to FIU Ireland
and to the Revenue Commissioners.
● From June 2017, reporting to the FInancial Intelligence Unit (FIU) must be
made via goAML
● Firms should ensure that they are registered with goAML as STRs cannot be
submitted via goAML unless the firm has previously registered.
● The Revenue Commissioners will accept a printed copy of the STR submitted
on goAML which should be posted to the relevant address.
34
© RegSol 2019
Go AML
35
© RegSol 2019
Detection of Red Flags: Suspicious Activity
36
© RegSol 2019
Detection of Red Flags: Suspicious Activity
• Client accepts very unfavourable conditions unrelated to his or her health or age
37
© RegSol 2019
Detection of Red Flags: Suspicious Activity
38
© RegSol 2019
Detection of Red Flags: Suspicious Activity
• The first (or single) premium is paid from a bank account outside the
country
• Client shows more interest in the cancellation or surrender of an
insurance/investment contract than in the long-term results of
investments or the costs associated with termination of the contract
• Client cancels investment or insurance soon after purchase
• Early redemption takes place in the absence of a reasonable
explanation or in a significantly uneconomic manner
• Series of small claims below premium amount
39
© RegSol 2019
Confidentiality
▪ Reports made in good faith are freed from all statutory, contractual or
other confidentiality restrictions
© RegSol 2019 40
SAR/STR Output: Statistics (2017) - AMLCU
© RegSol 2019 41
SAR/STR Output: Statistics
© RegSol 2019 42
SAR/STR Output: Results (FATF MER 2017)
© RegSol 2019 43
SAR/STR Output:Results?
© RegSol 2019 44
Tipping Off
Ensure staff understand their obligations in this regard and this is present
in training and procedural material:
Section 49 provides for two separate but related offences being where
the firm knows or suspects on the basis of information learned during the
course of carrying on business as a firm:
▪ the firm shall not make any disclosure that would be likely to prejudice
an investigation that may be conducted following the making of a
report under Chapter 4;
▪ investigation is being contemplated or is being carried out into whether
an offence has been committed, the firm shall not make any disclosure
that is likely to prejudice the investigation.
45
© RegSol 2019
CBI Risk Factors
● Inadequate practices in operation around identification and escalation of
suspicious transactions:
● Weaknesses in the processes and procedures associated with STRs,
including: -
■ Deficiencies in internal record keeping;
■ Insufficient or no evidence on files of the assessment and adjudication
performed by the MLRO or MLRO delegate on the rationale for
discounting suspicions or for making an STR to the Authorities;
■ Staff not receiving an acknowledgment of having raised a suspicion to
the MLRO;
■ Lack of detail of report to authorities, dates, amounts, reasons for
suspicions omitted
46
© RegSol 2019
CBI Risk Factors
● Unexplained delays in suspicions being reviewed and determined by the
MLRO or defined timelines not considered “as soon as practicable”; and -
● Case management of STRs conducted manually by firms, without sufficient
audit trails in place to evidence decisions made and actions taken.
● Policies and procedures did not sufficiently outline the internal suspicious
transaction reporting process or tipping off;
● Discrepancies between actual procedures and operational practices e.g. non-
use of internal reporting forms;
● No audit trail or on-going monitoring process in place to assist in identifying
where ML/TF concerns may have arisen in relation to specific policyholders;
● Lack of assurance testing performed on the STR process.
● Lack of training to make staff aware of reporting obligations and procedures
47
© RegSol 2019
Contact Us:
RegSol Ireland
Ph 01 539 4884
info@RegSol.ie
Web: Tweet:
www.RegSol.ie @RegSolIreland