Muestras X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

1 16.672 16.688 16.64 16.64 16.672 16.672

2 16.704 16.688 16.64 16.672 16.736 16.672
3 16.72 16.736 16.688 16.704 16.752 16.688
4 16.72 16.736 16.704 16.72 16.752 16.768
5 16.752 16.768 16.72 16.72 16.768 16.784
6 16.784 16.8 16.72 16.72 16.784 16.8
7 16.8 16.8 16.752 16.736 16.798 16.8
8 16.8 16.8 16.768 16.768 16.8 16.8
9 16.816 16.8 16.768 16.768 16.8 16.832
10 16.832 16.816 16.768 16.8 16.8 16.832
11 16.832 16.816 16.784 16.816 16.8 16.837
12 16.832 16.832 16.816 16.832 16.8 16.837
13 16.837 16.848 16.816 16.832 16.816 16.848
14 16.848 16.88 16.848 16.832 16.832 16.864
15 16.848 16.88 16.88 16.832 16.832 16.864
16 16.848 16.896 16.896 16.848 16.88 16.88
17 16.848 16.896 16.896 16.88 16.88 16.896
18 16.864 16.912 16.896 16.896 16.896 16.896
19 16.864 16.944 16.96 16.928 16.928 16.96
20 16.88 16.96 16.96 16.928 16.96 16.96
21 16.896 16.965 16.96 16.944 16.976 16.96
22 16.896 16.976 16.976 16.944 16.992 16.992
23 16.96 17.008 16.992 16.976 17.024 16.992
24 16.992 17.04 17.008 17.04 17.056 17.083
25 17.253 17.152 17.28 17.104 17.136 17.136

RANGO
0.7 16.890

0.6 16.880

0.5 16.870

0.4 16.860

0.3 16.850

0.2 16.840

0.1 16.830

0 16.820
GENERAL X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7
16.810
RANGO GENERAL X1 X2
0.2 16.840

0.1 16.830

0 16.820
GENERAL X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7
16.810
RANGO GENERAL X1 X2
 X7 GENERAL X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7
MODA 16.8 16.848 16.8 16.768 16.832 16.8 16.8 16.8
16.64 MEDIA 16.857 16.844 16.8655 16.845 16.835 16.8588 16.866 16.881
16.736 MEDIANA 16.837 16.837 16.848 16.816 16.832 16.816 16.848 16.864
16.752 RANGO MAX 17.28 17.253 17.152 17.28 17.104 17.136 17.136 17.136
16.768 RANGO MIN 16.64 16.672 16.688 16.64 16.64 16.672 16.672 16.64
16.8 RANGO 0.64 0.581 0.464 0.64 0.464 0.464 0.464 0.496
16.8 % ERROR 0.143 0.1561 0.13452 0.1546 0.1648 0.1412 0.1339 0.11896
16.8
16.816
16.837
DATOS ESTADÍSTICOS
16.848 20
18
16.848
16
16.848
14
16.864 12
16.88 10
16.88 8
6
16.928
4
16.928 2
16.944 0
GENERAL X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7
16.944
MODA MEDIA MEDIANA
16.96 RANGO MAX RANGO MIN RANGO
16.96
16.965
Conclusión: Las muestras seleccionadas si pueden ser analizadas estadísticamente, gracias a
17.024 esto podemos corroborar que las dimensiones de los jabones estan siendo acertadas en mas
17.12 de 99%, donde su porcentaje de error es inferior al indice de tolerancia que admite un 0,4%,
y todos estan inferiores al 0,2%
17.136

MEDIA
16.890

16.880

16.870

16.860

16.850

16.840

16.830

16.820

16.810
GENERAL X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7
16.840

16.830

16.820

16.810
GENERAL X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7
 100

dísticamente, gracias a
endo acertadas en mas
ia que admite un 0,4%,