ISLAM

A CONCEPT OF POLITICAL
WORLD INVASION
BY MUSLIMS

CHAPTERS CONTENTS
FORWARD
INTRODUCTION
I Historical back ground of Islam in India.
II Mohd’s life in brief
III Islam after Mohd's death
IV Causes of Islam's fast growth
V Islam's spread in India
VI Views of National Leaders on Islam
VII Islamic Jehad or Terrorism
VIII Islam is Arab Nationalism
 IX Muslim problem in India.
Old Muslim problem in India, resurfacing-
X
Caution to India
XI Islamic plan of India's conquest
XII Time for decision
Need of awareness amongst the Indian
XIII
youth
XIV Muslim problem in India and the world
XIV (A) Islam, India and Bangladesh
XV Provocative Ayats in Quaran
XVI Quaran and The Non-Muslims
XVII Are there solutions to Muslim problem?
Dr B. R. Ambedkar had visualized Muslim
XVIII
problem
XIX Buddhist frescos at Bamiyan in Afghanistan
Immediate need of Hindus – Revival of
XX
Jansangh
XXI Message for the Muslims in India
XXII Islam in politics of 21 s t century.
XXIII The Dilemma of Vajpayee as Muslims-see it?
Indian Muslim's call for Mughalastan from
XXIV
out of India
XXV Kashmir Problem from Islamic angle
XXVI Belief in Fundamental Islamization
XXVII Pseudo Secularists in India

ISLAM
A CONCEPT OF POLITICAL
WORLD INVASION
BY MUSLIMS

Maulana Mohd Ali whom Mahatma Gandhi

called his brother is on record
humiliating the Mahatma and saying
 "Yes, according to Islam I hold
an adulterous and fallen Musalmaan
even better than Mahatma Gandhi".

Gandhi advocated pardon to the

Assassin Muslim who killed
Swami Shradhhanand,
who was believed to have written
a book with its Title "Rangeela Rasul"

ISLAM

IS THIS NOT TRUE ?

1] GURU TEG BAHADUR WAS

BEHEADED BY ISLAMIC ZEALOT
AURANGZEB FOR REFUSING TO
EMBRACE ISLAM

2] Were not the two young

sons of Guru Govind Singh
cast alive in a wall at
SIRHIND in Punjab for their
refusal to embrace Islam?

3] Was not young HAQIQAT RAI

a Hindu 'Balak' (a child of
12 years of age ) from
SIALKOT sentenced to death by
Islamic QAZI of LAHORE ON HIS
REFUSAL TO EMBRACE ISLAM ?

* * *

Islamic Juris Prudence

1] Evidentiary value of one man equals the evidence of

two women.

2] A Muslim can divorce his wife through TALAQ - E –

BIDDAT by pronouncing three times, even when joking or
in a state of intoxication, TALAQ, TALAQ, TALAQ. A man
can have four wifes but a women can have only one
husband. This is the law of SHARIAT.

3] A female can inherit only half of what a male can

inherit.
 4] A divorced wife cannot remarry her divorced husband
unless she marries some one else and proves cohabitation
before being allowed to remarry her former divorced
husband.

THE WORLD HAS MOVED INTO 21ST Century with

superior civilization in the hope of creating one
peaceful world for all world citizens to live in peace &
dignity with assured human rights.
 FOREWORD
Dr. PRAVEEN TOGADIA

I have been chosen to write a foreword to the

above book written by Supreme Court Advocate Mr. .R.V.
Bhasin who in the year 1947 left Lahore then in India
and now in Pakistan along with his other members of the
family Even at Lahore in his very young age, Mr. Bhasin
entered the RSS Shakha displaying his love & respect for
his Hindu faith At young age, The children are usually
influenced by their parents, elders and other friends
Mr. R V Bhasin the author of the book shows his good
reason and strong conviction in the Hinduism or the
Hindu way of life Leaving behind everything earned and
collected by his ancestors, Mr. Bhasin with his other
family members chose to leave behind in Pakistan, all
that really matters to most human beings, the material
aspects of this world. Similarly, we the people who
always lived in India, do indeed owe, to such like
persons 3 families that gratitude for which we the
Hindus in particular, earned country's freedom.

This book with Mr.Bhasin's analytical Lawyer's

mind does convincingly bring out the details of Muslims
faith in Islam, a semetic religion That was born in
Saudi Arabia in the year 632 AD 16 almost 1400 yrs ago
and The book specially places truthful realities with
historical citations and pertinent information about The
contents of Muslim's holy book Quaran'. Islam after
Christianity is the widely spread theocratic faith
about which if not all the world inhabitants should know
at least this much as is contained in this book 'ISLAM -
A CONCEPT OF POLITICAL WORLD INVASION BY MUSLIMS',
should be known.

I am happy to observe the collosal research carried out

by the author of the book that shall pass any unbiased
scrutiny by any cross section of the world society,
with compliments and credit.

Freedom of speech & expression as guaranteed To the

citizens of India have been intelligently used by the
author to furnish well researched information about
Islam & the Muslims in India that must help every sort
of books readership, anywhere in the world. I am of the
firm view that due to our own history and future
national planning, the information and Knowledge as
revealed in this book with conviction and authenticity
can be effectively used by one & all in India 10 serve
the cause of humanity through Hinduism, that rejects
dogmatism & allows untold freedom to its followers

I have also had the honour of releasing Mr. R.V. Bhasin

5 earlier book. 'ESSENCE OF HINDUISM1 that too provides
to the readers, a grand vision of India's past heritage
and explanation of Hinduisms grand Vedic Philosophy.
Neither of these two books should enter into any
controversy and the worldwide readership shall be
better illuminated by going through this book written
for the benefit of one and all in simple English
language That has become the LINGUIA FRANCA of the most
young educated urban children and not so old young
parents, now living all over the world The book in its
short form does reveal even to the learned specialists,
some very purposeful facts about Islam and its true
pursuit to convert the entire world into DARUL ISLAM &
ARAB NATIONALISM

Having carefully looked at the contents of the book with

fearless narration by its author. I wish him success and
congratulate him for his appreciable efforts in writing
this admirable short treatise in the form of a book May
be, even The present BJP Govt. led by Shri, Vajpayee &
Shri L.K Advani discover something Re-evaluated by book
s author who has recorded also Parliament views of Dr. B
R Ambedkar.

The book has correctly analyzed the meaning and

necessity of amending India's Constitution and calling
India i.e.. Bharat also as Hindustan 'A HINDU RASHTRA1.
IT has really no political overtones but a strong factor
of uplifting the morale of India's majority population
of almost 80 core Hindus in the population of over 100
crore total inhabitants.

Our present world with this book for its own necessity
based on history S literature is bound to become richer
m its overall perspective. I recommend every Indian or
at least every Hindu family to look into this book and
to authentically discover, the realities of Islam which
although means PEACE, yet is not pursued with this clear
aim to help the entire world society The clear
statement of QURAN in its unarnendibility & rigidity
sanctioning violence is what requires the present day
world leaders first To know & then to plan the welfare
of the entire human society by taking into account the
sordid realities and facts contained in the holy Quran
Unfortunately, it is ironical culture that the
 recommended conduct on the part of the believers i e the
Muslims provides for disturbance of world peace and
giving birth To Terrorism in its wake.

Many more Islamic O5AMA- BIN- LADENS are said shall be

born which statement is recently made by the Muslim
President of Egypt Mr. Hosani Mubarak. The book shall
definitely serve the world and the people believing in
different faiths living happily on the surface of the
Indian sub-continent. The concept of Hindu Rashtra is no
devaluation of Hindu's firm's belief in VASUDEVAM
KUTUMBKAM & SARVE BHAVANTU SUKHINAM The world is one
family and the welfare of each of its inhabitants must be
its sole concern Myself and my Hindu brethren will like to
serve mankind through our unshakable faith in the real
philosophy of Hinduism whose vernacular translation is
HINDUTVA S which by its fundamental belief is the honest
SECULARISM
It is time that the Hindus stood up for their rights in
their own country S. Took special note of country's own
history particularly taking note of Muslims continuous &
sustained hatred towards them & their religious beliefs
in Idol worship With such un-comprisable, stiff &
unbridgeable gap between The beliefs of the two
communities, Hindus in India cannot afford to neglect,
building themselves m strength to protect Their ancient
social S cultural values Even in The present India, I for
one strongly apprehend that at least if not 100%, a great
percentage of Muslims continue To owe extra territorial
loyalties to Arab land than to India In the event of any
military conflict between India and Pakistan, a large
number of Indian Muslims may be expected to aid Pakistan
than India

This is clearly established from the going on terrorism

caused by Muslims backed by ISI. This has to be our
concern to tackle ISI agents in India.

Every Indian, particularly the Hindus in India, must unite

to fully assert their political strength in favour of that
Govt. which should openly work to support & advance the
truly Hindu Social & cultural values of India's past
grandeur. No comprise be allowed to be made in the
fallacious projection of pseudo secularism as is being
demanded by the leftists in India.

Hindutva is itself secular and all those born in India

ought to be the honest & true Indians. Our written
Constitution guarantees to every Indian citizen, a right to
live in peace with freedom in a Hindu Rashtra.

This is the truthful statement, This is what, I as an

Indian born of Hindu parents, dream of:

Let this book be blessed to educate one and all about the
 revealition of Islam and its effect on India and her
people.
Dr. Praveen Togad
[a International Genl. Secy. Vishwa Hindu Panshad]

ISLAM
A CONCEPT OF POLITICAL WORLD
INVASION BY MUSLIMS

INTRODUCTION

With the dawn of 21 sl century mankind moves forward

with some hope to evolve a better and more peaceful
world for the humans living on earth. It has behind it,
sufficient amount of ancient and medieval historical
records. The world experience of the past cannot ignore
social, cultural, economic and poloitcal upliftment of
man. The world holds a colossal store house of man's
accomplishment in growing towards maturity of human
mind. Hence, none can escape taking into account human's
belief in theology or religion or faith while attempting
to shape man's own future to ensure moving as one human
family inhabiting the planet earth.. Indeed, man's
continuing evolution has also found a common basis of
trying to shape his future on the pedestal of science
and the great progress made by it in the last 3 to 400
years. Man's continuing belief in his faith or religion
has undisputedly cast its effect on his own maturity in
social, cultural, economic and political necessities.

Human problems when collectively taken finally focus on

one common point i.e. the humans need to establish a
firm political centre. By this, it is meant to control
human actions on theological beliefs. In the case of
Islamic faith, one cannot fail to notice that the
Islamic doctrine has remained totally stagnant. It is
for the reason that the holy book of Quaran itself
forbids any one to dare alter anything in it since it is
a dogmatic assertion what is contained in it, is the
last word of God Almighty, the Allaha. The world of
today is pushed to take a special notice of Muslim
world's Pan Islamic vision.

Islamic theology is strongly tied to its root of

converting the entire world into one Islamic society and
according to it, this alone is the correct road to final
world peaceAt does not accept any other road thought by
man equally good to emancipate hinself. Islam is
therefore totally opposed to any other theological idea.
In this context, it not only challenges the world
society by being intolerant but it sanctions violence as
an accepted notion to wage wars that are called Jehads
against the non-believers. Islam divides the human
society into two clear halves. Those who believe in the
basic tenets of Islam and those who do not. The Islamic
faith begins with Muslims accepting the only declaration
which is

LA-ILLAHA, MOHD. RASULALLAHA

(There is only one God and Mohammed is his Prophet)

This is known as Kalma by the recitation of which when

done three times, the recitor stands converted into a
Muslim. To convert into Islam for anyone from any faith,
all that is needed is to recite the above Kalma three
times and nothing further is needed by way of any ritual
or any social, cultural or religious ceremony. It is
really so simple.

The five pillars of Islamic faith as set out in-the holy

book called The Quaran are:

1. Recitation of the above Kalma.

2. Offering of Namaaz as per Quaranic Ayats

(couplets con- tained for the purpose in the text of
Quaran), five times a day. A special community gathering
of reading of Namaez on each Friday of the week is a
special religious ordainment for-the Muslims.

3. Zakat (giving of charity). 20% of any Muslims

own earnings are ordained to be given as Zakat to the
poor.

4. Roza (keeping of the fast) Muslims are

ordained to keep fasts on each day in the holy month of
Ramadhan. The Muslims follow the lunar calendar.

5. Haj (visit to Mecca in Saudi Arabia). Muslims

are ordained to visit Mecca in Saudi Arabia at least
once in their life time to perform special rituals as
per theological clictations.

Islam and Mohd in reality are one and the same

thing. Mohd who was the founder of Islam was born in
Saudi Arabia in a tribe with its name as 'Quereshi'. The
concept of Islam grew in him when he was 52 years old.
He died at the age of 62. It is only in the last 10
years of his life that he often retired in a cave near
Mecca where he claimed to have recieved odrainments from
the God Almighty. The messages so recieved by him came
to be later complied by his successors in the holy book
of the Muslim's called the Quaran. He claims what is
contained there-in is the last message given to the
mankind through him by God Almighty called Allah. How he
himself followed and carried out several deeds as the
messenger of the God as his chosen Prophet are further
recorded as his Hadhits. A Muslim is ordained to follow
both the dictations of Quaran and the declarations made
as the Hadbits. Theologically, any differnce in opinion
while interpreting the texts of Quaran or Hadhits is
left to the religious leader called the Mullahs, who are
the heads of Mosque where the Muslims meet to offer
Namaaz.

It is unmistakably stated in Quaran that the entire

world is to be comsidered divided in two camps, 1. Those
who belive and owe their allegiance to Islam. They are
the Muslims or the believers 2. Those who do not owe the
allegiance to Islam and who do not accept Mohd as the
Prophet sent by Allaha with his message as contained in
Quaran and Hadiths. Once a Muslim by faith or choice the
is not thereafter ever permitted any freedom to walk out
of it. Those who do not believe as above are the non-
believers. They are termed as the Kafirs. What is not in
accordance with the dictations in Quaran and Hadiths is
called Kufr A true Muslim is ordained to convert the
entire world society into the society of the believers
and to encleavour to totally exterminate the society of
the non-believers termed as Kafirs. What is not in
accordance with the clictations in Quaran is termed as
Kufr. The Muslims believe and are ordained by their holy
religious texts to eliminate Kufl- and the Kafirs from
the surface of the earth. Any bloody war that is fought
by the believers against the non-believers carries the
religious sanction of Islam, the literal meaning of
which is peace, it 6-penly 'directs the Muslims to
behead the Kafirs and to lay their lives to exterminate
Kufr even at the cost of their own lives. It is one of
the three Semetic faiths that supports violence to
spread the message of God amongst the humans. The other
two religions are Christianity and Judaism.

The Geo/Political states not managed or controlled by

the above named Islamic believers are termed as Darul-
Herb and those Geo/Political states that are under the
political control of the Islamic believers are called as
Darul-lslam. The entire Muslim society of believers is
ordained by the Islamic theology as contained in the
holy book of Quaran to convert the non-believers into
believers and Islamic religious sanction is openly
accorded for waging if necessary, any number of bloody
wars. These wars are termed as Jel7ads. A Muslim is
further ordained to wage a Jehad against the non-
believers even at the cost of his life. In fact, this is
his first and foremost religious duty. Should he die in
this ursuit, the God assumed Almighty as per Quaranic
statements assures to such pursuero ait an assured life
of joy and pleasure in the heavens where he is promised
to be served by 72 beautiful maidens and 72 young male
children to beget pleasure. Such a persom is called as
Shaheed. Shoul he survive while pursuing this aim and
live on the earth, Quaran promises on behalf of the God
Almighty Allaha to enjoy the life on earth by using all
that he gets by way of victory over the Kafirs. Of the
wealth, that the Islamic victor begets as the pursuer of
this aim, a Muslim is to part with 1/5th of such capture
that includes number of females and children, to the
king and to enjoy the remainder 4/5th of the captured
wealth as his own personal property. No believer is
answerable ever thereafter to, anyone. Such capture of
worldly possessions gained whilet pursuing this holy aim
of Mulsims is called as 'Male Ganimat'. Mohd. the
Prophet himself took two out of his eleven wives as,
'Male Ganimat' after converting them into Islamic faith
and marrying them as,per his own sanctioned religious
beliefs. He got the political 'Male Ganimat' after
scoring some military victories over his rivals
liberalism that Islam allows to his followers over the
non-believers.

The present day world is now suurounded by

this ideology that challenges the existence of human
freedom which is allowed only to the believers as per
Islamic faith. This began some 1400 years before and has
become a serious world problem today. Islam declares to
its followers where political governance is in the hands
of the believers, they are to act and crush any counter
idea and where it still lacks political control then to
lie on wait for the moment when through all other means,
Darul-Herb gets coverted into Darul-Islam.

Indians have experienced both lives while living under

Islamic political domination and when not under Islamic
domination. When the British control ended over India in
1947, )ndian sub- contient was divided into India and
Pakistan. Our leaders expected that by agreeing to such
divisions, the country will get rid of Islamic desire to
convert India as a part of Pan Isallnic territory.
However, as can be seen and it cannot be differed that
our experience since Independence has been totally
different. Although Muslims left in India were in
miniority and by comparison of figures, although they
are still in minority yet a similar scenario that
existed and caused the division of the country in 1947,
has started reappearing before the present day India,
once again.

One needs to look at certain published literature from

England under the authorship of a Muslim settler there
to discover the real intentions of the true Islamic
believes. An author by the name of Anwar Sheikh has
published the following books that shall startle any
reader since the author reveals the underlying volcanic
Islamic intentions. The books now available in the world
market are:

1. Islam - Arab National Movement

2. Islam -Arab Imperialism

 3. Islam - Sex and Violence

CHAPTER-I

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF ISLAM IN INDIA

Religion of Islam was started by Mohd. said to

the Prophet sent to earth by the God Almighty in about
the middle of the 711 century AD. The followers of this
religion are called the Muslims. Mohd.was born in Saudi
Arabia in a tribe by the name of Queresh. This is one of
the three Semetic faiths that grew up finally into a
very strong belief under the name of Islam. The word
Islam in Arabic language means Peace. The other Semeitc
faiths are Judaism followed by Jews and the third is
Christianity that came into being with the birth and
death of Jesus Christ. In the above three faiths, there
are some similarties. All the three faiths accept their
initiators as the messengers or sons of God. They also
similarly place their unquestioned trust in their
respective holy books called as 1. OLD TESTAMENT
(Judaism started by Moses) 2. NEW TESTAMENT or Bible
(Christianity started by Lord Jesus) and 3. ISALM
(started by Mohd. with its holy book called QUARAN). All
the three faiths thus draw their inspirations from their
respective books and the initiators of the same. While
the Old Testament and the Bible were first written in
the Hebrew language, Quaran the holy book of Islam came
to be written in the Arabic. The followers of all the
three religions thus owe their allegiance to their
respective books and to their initiators. Naturally, the
followers of each Sect restrict themselves within the
close circle of their holy book's contents and develop a
special fraternal relationship between themselves as the
respective followers of their faiths. The human society
as such is therefore divided on the basis of the
following of what is said in their respective holy
books,. Beyond the following, the rest of the humanity
is not accorded any special or otherwise fraternal sort
of relationship.

All the three faiths do not bring within its

embrace, all humans tied together as the fellow humans.
Therefore, these sects create within the society special
and narrow circles of brotherhood based on the
fellowship of the followers only. Whereas, religion as
followed by the humans should have a tendency of uniting
the entire human society under some special social code,
the above named Semetic faiths divide the society into
narrow sects. This is very much unlike the ancient
Aryan's Sanatan Dharma about which India's every sacred
religious scriptures speak in terms of 1. Vasudevam
Kutumbkam 2. Sarva Dharma Sambhava means that the whole
world is one family. Sarva Dharma Sambhava means it is
possible to accomodate all faiths and religions at the
same time.

The followers of Judaism called the Jews

have their holy city in Jerusalem. Christianity came out
of Judaism. Lord Jesus was its cause. Its holy place of
birth is at Bethlehem presently in Israel. Somehow,
there were some differences in the contents of the Old
Testament and the propogatory statements of Lord
Jesus.1-Some Jews were opposed to the same. A Governer
appointed on behalf of the ruler of Rome in Bethlehem
was led to prosecute and hang Lord. Jesus on the Cross.
However, a few followers of Lord Jesus contniued to
spread his message. Three hundred years later came King
Constantine who accepted Christianity that grew into a
forceful and strong faith that soon spread around Rome &
in other parts of Europe.

In the 11th century, the Roman Empire stood split

in two parts-into west and east. The Western Roman
Empire and the Western Church accepted Rome as their
guiding light of faith and politics. The Eastern Roman
Empire was guided from Constantinople now called
Istanbul. The Western Roman Church accepted its leader
at Rome and called him the Pope who ruled over the
entire Western Europe and Western Church. The followers
of Pope are called the Catholics. The Eastern Church
that split up did not accept Rome and Pope as their
leader. Hence, Russia, Greece, Georgia, Syria and some
none Eastern European coutnries followed their own
revised religious ideas.

Some strong feelings of Nationalism exhibit

a natural tendency within humans. This brings about a
sense of commonness among groups of humans when it is
based upon some common gains to be made by the huamns
inhabiting some territory that is politically governed
for them. It is not only but natural that a homogeneous
society comes into being. A feeling of Nationalism is in
fact an emotional upsurge that unites all people into
one society when the emotions involved work to uplift
the humans inhabiting a territory governed in their
intrests.

Indian society by virtue of sub-continent's a large mass

of land provides such basis. This singular geographical
entity itself is responsible for unifying all its
inhabitants to adopt and work for some common kind of
social and cultural upliftment. On top of it, the great
land mass with flowing rivers of water further provides
such a National cohesion. Such factors are divinely
given to the people of India. A great stretch of plains
with one commonness provides to Indian people, not only
a sense of unity but it delivers to one and, all, a
sense of fraternity. This is because of society's common
concern. This has over the centuries of time ripened
into a common cultural, social, economical and spiritual
faith. The most important singular factor that binds a
nation is the faith of the people in their ancestry and
religion. Put together, it is termed as 'Nationality'.

Ancient Indian sages, their spirituals pursuits and

messages of one world family (Vasu-devam Kutummbkam)
have greatly contributed to the very thought process of
one India. Max Muller, Dr.Annie Beasant and several
other world leaders of the past have openly declared,
India without Hindusim is unthinkable. An independent
India and her people are thus divinely ordained to
protect their spiritual chord of National unity in which
social and cultural emotions in commonness can be seen.
We have therefore to take particular care of Hindutva
philosophy that provides such a strong force of one
commonness. This in turn does have its roots in India's
ancient religion. The religion has its roots in the
minds of every Indian. Any attack on this activity and
faith shall therefore need a very strong fencing around
the philosophical principles of the Vedas. It is from
there that such feelings of Indian Nationalism and
Hinduism have grown. The latter is not merely a faith or
belief in any sort of Gospel's spread and introduced by
its thinker, but Hinduism is in fact a way of life lived
by the Indian people since time immemorial. Indianism
and Hinduism have thus to be unabashedly declared as
synonymous. It is this singular factor that provides to
India its real inherent strength of every sort. This is
regardless of the method chosen for its political
governance.

Any idea contrary to this is suicidal and hence must be

opposed with all the strength that the people of.1ndia
can muster. Unlike original Indian political thinkers
like Tilak, Lajpat Rai, Vipin Chander Paul and other
such like political Leaders of the generations, the
recent political Leaders like Gandhi and Nehru in fact
came under the influence of the British system of
education. A clear change towards Westernism became
noticeable in the Indian history. This began with Gandhi
and Nehru both diluting their inner feelings towards
Hinduism and in its place, they substituted prematurely
a sort of secularism. Indeed, this affected the minds of
the people of India. Nothing more could please the
British Imperialists who desired Indian society to split
into groups based on anything other than one religion.
Hindus being in majority were to be taken special care
of. India came to be finally balkanized into two
separate independent nations of India and Pakistan. The
latter stood further divided into Pakistan and
Bangladesh. The dawning of the date of freedom from the
British yoke was delayed only because of the success of
Mr. Jinnha of the Muslim league who openly declared that
Hindus and Mulims in India were two separate nations.
This came to be called to be a Two Nations Theory. This
was supported by the British. Those Hindus and Muslims
who had lived together for past centuries suddenly
mistrusted each other on religious grounds till an open
demand of the Muslims to convert

Hindu India (Darul Herb) into (Darul Islam) a State

governed totally by the Muslims. It is thus, a clear
defeat of the Congress Leaders that was responsible for
the geographical division of the sub-continent into two
different sovereign countries. Hence, with such a
historical past, reemergence of the political situation
this time created by the left over Muslims in India
after the partition of the country, does definitely
arouse the legitimate concern to the majority population
of the Hindus in India. Indeed, Hindus are rightly
apprehensive to ensure what is left of the sub-continent
is not allowed to drift into Darul Islam once aagain. To
wipe off any Darul Herb, is the declared policy of the
Millat (Pan Islamic fraternity). This sort of gradual
maturity can be seen in the Indian State of J&K. Hence,
unless Hindus ancientism acting as one common Nation
unite themselves into a strong Nation with it as its
sole aim , the country does run a great risk in times to
come to convert the whole of India into Darul Islam.
Muslims do not and cannot accept any non-believer as
equal to them and hence Modi of Gujarat is too right
when he cautions Indian people UNITE to safeguard
themselves from the Muslim invasion who are waiting only
to convert India from Darul Herb to Darul Islam and now
openly say and believe in HAM PAANCH - HAMARRE PACCHIS.

CHAPTER-II
MOHD'S LIFE IN BRIEF

The founder of Islamic religion, Mohd. was born near

Mecca in Saudi Arabia in a local tribe of the Pagans
called Queresh on 20th April in 570 AD. The Pagans of
those days were believers in idol worship. In a temple
at Kaba, near Mecca, was a place were people gathered
every year to worship several idols of their deities.
Mohd.'s mother's name was Amina who was the wife of a
Quereshi Pagan by the name of Abdullah. Before the birth
of Mohd., Abdullah died and hence Mohd. was a posthumous
child who was brought up on the milk of a hired nurse by
the name of Halima since Amina the mother of Mohd. had
become so weak that.she could not provide to the child
her motherly milk. As per the customs of the Pagans who
followed several rituals started by the Jews, Mohd.'s
penis was circumcised. This practice was in vogue with
the Jews of Saudi Arabia and was also followed by the
local tribes composed of the Pagans. Hence, circumcising
the penis is not the original Islamic ritual. It is an
ancient Jewish custom, which began in the deserts
probaly because of shortage of water. Mohd. was thus
brought up by Halima for 6 years and was later delivered
back to his mother Amina. Soon thereafter, she died and
further bringing up was done by the Grandmother of Mohd.
who too died at the age of 80. Mohd. thereafter was
brought up by his uncle Abu Taliib. This took place near
Mecca in Saudi Arabia.

As he grew up, the uncle of Mohd. had him employed with

one rich widow by the name of Khadija. She carried out
trade with territories around by exchanging merchandize
moved from one place to the other on Camel backs. These
were called Kafilas. Mohd as an employee of Khadija at
the age of 25 took care of Khadija's Kafilas and hence
gave aid to Khadija in her trade. She was herself 15
years older than Mohd. She was a widow after the death
of her two former husbands. Both decided to get married
and from this wedlock, six children are said to have
been born, out of which five children died attheir young
ages. Only one child survived as the daughter of Mohd.
by the name of Fatima who later married Ali.

During this period, it is said that Mohd. used to have

strange attacks of some disease for which he uused to
retire to a cave near Mecca. He anounced to the world
that in the cave he used to meet God's messenger Gabriel
who gave to Mohd. God's own messages which he called as
11hams. He therefore, delivered to himself a title of
God's Prophet, which later came to be termed as
RasuleAllahe. His wife Khadija was the first to become
his follower who later came to be termed as the
believers, Muslims or Musalmans. it is at about this
time Mohd. announced amongst his followers the first
message of God i.e. an Ilharn which is LA ILLAHA, MOHD.
RASUL ILLAHA (there is only one God and Mohd. is his
Prophet). New Para Khadija was followed by Abu Bakr
(father of Ayesha who later married Mohd) and Ali (who
later became the son-in-law of Mohd). His old uncle
inspite of persuasion did not accept Mohd.'s demand.
Thereafter, the old uncle also died at his ripe age of
80. On his death, Mohd is said to have followed the
custom of his tribe to seek peace for the departed soul
at his grave but immediately thereafter he stopped
himself going to the grave of his own mother and also
prevented his followers never to attach themselves with
the dead and the buried people. He declared it as
contrary to his belief calling it as Kufr and the one
who disobeyed such direction was to the termed as Kafir

Mohd at about this time had reached the age of 52 and

many locals had joined him accepting his aforesaid
Kalma. The Pagans because of their ancient beliefs were
themselves idol worshippers and amongst their accepted
dieties were prominently known names of Ilia, Laat,
Milat and Ujja. These idols with many more idols were
kept in the holy place or in a temple of the Pagans near
Mecca. Every year, thousands of people used to visit
this place and such a visit for religious belief was
called the Haj. The idols in this temple were later
destroyed except for one round black stone which is
still retained in this very temple. This temple was
called by the name of Kaba. Later in time, Mohd. himself
invaded this temple at Mecca from Medina where he had
migrated in order to spread his new message of Islam.
With him went from Mecca to Medina, his followers that
included Abu Bakr, Osman and Ali. The date of Mohd.'s
move from Mecca to Medina has come to be called as
Hijrat. This took place in the year 622 AD and is
reckoned as the starting date of Muslim calendar. In
this period of 10 years from his age of 52 to 62, Mohd
succeeded in converting many Pagans to his belief.
Amongst those who opposed him were also some important
local tribal leaders. One SAIDE, a follower of Mohd
assassinated an opposing Queresh for which conduct the
aforesaid SAIDE earned special praise from Mohd and his
conduct is recorded as the first death given by a
believer to a non-believer.

It is however interesting to note that

although Mohd. praised the believe4 for his murderous
conduct of killing a non-believer but finding that there
will be many more important tribal leaders including
within the tribe of the Queresh who shall not approve of
such despicable conduct of releigous oppostion. He is
said to have recorded himself issuing a Fatwa calling
upon his followers not to resort to murders for forcing
anyone to convert from his faith professed by Mohd. As
can also be seen, this Ayat (included in the holy book
of Quaran) is the only single Ayat that is quoted by the
Muslims as their faith in peace and tolerance of other
religions. This was forced on account of importa ' nt
political reasons because there is no other Ayat in any
Sura of Quaran ever said later in time repeating the
spirit of this Ayat. On the other hand, there are a
nunber of opposing Ayats contained in the holy Quaran
that go clearly contrary to the above. At the end of
this book, the original text translated from Arabic into
English with the number of Suras and Ayats are recorded
for easy reference to enable readers to understand and
decide for themselves the real truth.

At Medina, Mohd. became a great success and soon earned

for himself the tittle of Khalifa and Imam both. By
this, Mohd. became both the religious and the political
head of his followers and formed a force of his
followers that undertook almost 82 military adventures,
out of which 26 military marches were led by Mohd.
himself.

Khadija his wife and his old uncle are both

said to have died when Mohd was about 50 years of age.
Earlier on, Mohd. was ably guided both by his wife
Khadija and his old uncle but on their death, he himself
started his political life of military adventures while
acting as the Khalifa and Imam both. It was he who laid
the foundation of Islamic theocracy solely and
exclusively on the basis of his accepted religion. He
got great military successes including winning the town
of Mecca and the temple at Kaba. He directed the
destruction of over 300 idols earlier worshiped by the
Pagans including by his own Quereshi tribesmen. He
allowed only one installation of the black round
meteoric stone to be installed in that temple which to
date continues to be revered by the Muslims, all over
the world. Muslims during HAJ are believed to kiss this
stone as a religious rule with utmost reverence.

During this period, a large number of

opposing Pagans were killed and Mohd laid some firm
rules of victory amongst which are, that a victor who is
a believer in the faith of Islam is allowed by the God
Almighty himself to enjoy 4/5th of his loot of capture in
any military victory over the non-believers and to offer
the remaining 1/5th to the Khalifa or to his appointed
representative. This is called Male Ganimat and is given
as God's own gift to the believer. This includes women
and children of the opponents as well. The widows of the
dead are religiously allowed to be enjoyed by the victor
believers. Where the opponent husband is alive with his
wife, the victor believer can take away the wife of the
opponent soliders as the religion of Islam declares
canceling of the husband/wife relationship of the
vanquished opponents, unless the opponents prayed to be
pardoned by embracing the religion of Islam by giving up
their former faith.

In course of 10 years of Mohd.'s life from

the age of 52 to 62, Mohd as a widower after the death
of his first wife Khadija is said to have taken 11 more
wives during this period. At the age of about 52, he
married a Jew widow who was converted to Islam. After
moving to Medina, he directed his friend and comrade Abu
Bakr to marry his seven years old daughter Ayesha to him
when he himself was about 52 years of age. It is said
that Abu Bakr declined to do so saying that his daughter
by the name of Ayesha was too young and was also engaged
to some one else. This being a promise could not be
broken. In relationship Ayesha was the niece of Mohd.
who put aside the objection of Abu Bakr saying that he
had an Ilham from Allah that he had given birth to
Ayesha to, become his wife. This could not be altered.
He is said to have cohabited with her when she became of
suitable age perhaps when she was only 9 to 10 years
old. He also later married the widow daughter of his
another comrade Oomer whose name was Hapsa. This was his
fourth marriage. The name of his fifth wife was Jinab
who too was a widow of his another comrade by the name
of Abdullah. The sixth wife of Mohd. was said to be the
mother of four children and was a Hindu who was
converted for this purpose to accept Islam. The seventh
wife was one Zarnab. She was the Zainab wife of a slave
by the name of Jaid whom Mohd. took as his adopted son
and made him divorce his wife so that she could marry
Mohd. She is said to have been a very beautiful woman
who took the fancy of Mohd, who had seen her naked when
she was once bathing? Here too, Mohd. is said to have
stated that he had another Ilharn from Allah that he
should marry her and that she was given birth on the
earth for this purpose. Mohd.'s eighth wife was Zoria.
The ninth wife went under the name of Umda Habiba. The
name of Mohd.s tenth wife was Sophia. The eleventh wife
of Mohd. was 26 years of age and was the widow of his
own uncle Usman, Her name was Mairmuna. Many writers
have stated.that besides the above, Mohd. also had more
than 11 wives both religiously married and otherwise.

He also had two famous further wives from

out of the slaves whose names were Moria and Hindan.
They became available to him as Male Ganimat after
scoring his military victories over his political
opponents. Moria gave birth to one son of Mohd who was
named as lbhrahim. He is said to have died at young age
itself.
Mohd is also said to have sanctioned marriage by the
custom of 'Mittah' by which it is meant that a believer
Muslim can marry a woman for a contracted period of time
and can so enjoy his life with his female partner
without incurring life time burden of her. lit is a
marriage by contract for some fixed time only.
Mohd.'s most loved wife Aayesha became a
widow at the age of 18 years only. She is said to have
recorded in Islamic history some facts known to her as
the wife of Mohd. who according to her was very greatly
fond of women and good perfumes. At the age of 62, Mohd.
died with his head in the lap of his most loved wife
Ayesha. Abu Bakr, Oomer and Usman were accorded
Khalifaship after the death of Mohd. They were his
fathers-in-law because he had married their daughters.
He is also said to have made one of his followers
divorce his wife so that he could marry her since he
said, he had an alham from the God Almighty that she was
born on the earth for him only. While the Sunnis accept
three named persons as above, succeeding Mohd as
Khalifas after his death, Shea Muslims do not & regard 2
nd Khalifa, Ali only as the next Khalifa after Mohd's
death.
One may really have to look in the Islamic
hisotry for discovering more important social and other
suchlike human beliefs in the days of Mohd in the area
of Saudi Arabia. Mohd was born in the year 570 AD. He
grew up in his early childhood under queer circumstances
as he was born as a posthumous child. He indeed must
have been brought up under very strenuous circumstances.
He began his divine thought when he was about 52 years
of age. He established Islam and preached it including
by waging wars for a period of only 10 years, Much about
his beliefs came to be written later in time when he was
followed by the selected/elected or appointed Khaifas
being Abu Bakr, Oomer and Usman who are really
responsible for compiling booth the book of the holy
Quaran and also for collecting most of his Hadits which
too are also followed by all Muslims.

Saudi Arabia at that point of time had

scattered population of mostly war like but illiterate
people divided in small tribes. Mohd.'s own tribe was
called, a tribe of the Quereshis. The Jews and the
Christians following Moses and Jesus Christ had already
been born and during this total period of almost 1000
years or so, these Semetic religions had already cast
their shadows of influence over the entire period of
time on almost the entire geographical area extending
also in the west. Because of acceptance by Rome of

Christianity, historically the Roman Empire

itself lost its control over this period of time, the
successors of Mohd. undertook spreading the influence of
Islam into Europe itself. It also extended its influence
towards the east upto Persia and in the next about 150
years the Islamic crusaders totally overtook the whole
of Persia and the area around Mesopotamia now called
Iraq plus Turkey. The earlier Civilization in Egypt was
dominated by the Pharisaic beliefs and later it was
dominated by Moses and Jesus. With the entry of Islam,
whole of Egypt stood converted to Islam. Similarly, in
east, the entire area of Persia and Mesopotamia took to
Islam. Islam spread upto Spain in Europe till the
Christian crusaders won over once again the area
dominated by Islam. Catholic Romans were led into such
kind of battles by the holy Pope at Rome. The battles
fought by the Christians have been named as the CRUSADES
& the soldiers fighting as Christians were called as
CRUSADERS.

With the above history, one can note that

there really did not exist a well explained and simple
philosophy of religion and for this reason, it was
perhaps easier for the Islamic followers to swiftly win
over the political dominance with the name of simple
theology that was called as Islam. The support of arms
was its moving crutch. Although, Mohd. himself lived for
a short period of only 10 years which marks the
beginning of the era of Hijra for the Muslims but its
continued expansion and retention is explainable mostly
on account of its severe rigidity that had in fact less
to do with humans or humanity on earth but had divine
promises kept for the humans to await the day of
judgement when the Lord i.e. the Allaha shall himself
deliver to the dead souls, rewards on the day of Quamat.
It was an easy to understand religious gospel that had
the intrinsic quality of pulling towards it, mass of
illiterate humanity. None can however doubt or deny the
real strength and cause of its fast spread all around,
owes to its severe rigidity enforced on the point of
sword. This is one religion that supports its spread by
waging Jehads including justifying conducts of terrorism
when it says " show no mercy to the non-believers
(Kafirs) or the idol worshippers and lie in wait for
them to behead them when they appear before you. (the
believers i.e. the Muslims)". This quotation is taken
from the book of holy Quaran.
With the success of wars begun by Mohd,
himself who rewarded his followers even when they took
to cruelty against the non-believers. This policy
continues till to date because a Muslim can rely upon hs
own divine ordainments contained in their holy book of
Quaran that openly justifies violence in the cause of
the spread of Islam. It is ordained upon them i.e. the
believers or the Muslims to lay their lives and fear not
for the consequences because if one dies while waging a
Jehad, Allaha the Almighty awaits his arrival in the
heavens with the promises to provide to him all the
earthly pleasures of life that includes young lads,
beautiful women, special heavenly wine in the beautiful
surroundings and environments with rivers full of water
flowing to deliver to such a person called as Shaheed
all that he might have missed for his death while
fighting the holy Jehad. Should he survive, he is
decorated with a title of Ghazi and is entitled to
retain 4/5th of all that he has gained from the wealth of
his opponent as his legitimately sanctioned religious
earnings and leaving the balance l/5th of such element of
plunder to the Khalifa or his war commander. Mohd
himself has unambiguously stated that he lived and led
his life only from the earnings of such successful
Jehads. This came to be called as Male-Ganimat.
Saudi Arabia being a sandy soil lacking-
water must have made its inhabitants fighting each other
perhaps for earning the bare needs to exist. Mohd. was
born during this period when the world around that area
had not been sufficiently aroused and educated in
spiritualism. From his beliefs in divinity and to pursue
divine blessings through recitation of prayers, 5 times
a day, observing fast during the holy month of Ramadhan
and offering Zakt to the poor must have worked as items
of humans faith in divinity i.e. the God who is Allaha
for the Muslims.

It is however strange that with the faith in

noble ideals as above, how could cruelty through
killings and waging wars as Jehads, even by adopting
tactics of terrorism can ever be made to go hand in
hand.

It is thereforealmost clear that Mohd. and

his followers who are rigidity controlled fully
understood the importance of religious faith taking
political control of geographical areas. Without this,
no peace can be guaranteed. He clearly understood that
in his days, perhaps Jews and Christians fought for the
only reason for not following the same religious gospel.
He intrdouced yet another third Semitic religion by
directing his followers to fight till the entire
territory of the world is politically brought under the
control of the Muslims. It is only then that they crush
every kind of religious opposition and a true Muslim
must work towards it, even if it means for him to die in
this cause.

Hence, although the word Islam literally

means in Arabic language Peace yet for all purpose.
Islam is only a concept of poltitical world invasion by
the Muslims. Terrorism as is being seen in present times
and as is being caused by Islam's followers like Osama-
Bin-Laden is nothing but an effort and pursuit in the
direction of world conquest by the Muslims. This has
been so dectared by fundamental Muslims.

One may note the peculiar characteristic of

Islamic faith when its holy book permits into it any one
without any restriction by reciting just 3 times LA
ILLAHA, MOHID. RASUL ILLAHA but not permitting any one
who has once entered into it, any freedom to walk out.
Should any one endeavour to walk out of Islamic faith,
the believers are allowed to behead such walkers. For
doing so, they shall be serving the honest and the best
cause of Islam.

CHAPTER-III
ISLAM AFTER MOHD'S DEATH

At the age of 62, Mohd. died with his head

in the lap of his favourite and youngestwife Ayesha
daughter of Abu Bakr. Abu Bakr, later came to be elected
as the next Khalifa. He was already an old man and hence
nothing significant really happened during his period of
Khilafat. The next to succeed as Khalifas after Abu
Bakr's death, were Oomer and Usman. It is stated by the
historians as both of them could not really match the
calibre of Mohd., they really did not succeed in
particular against the loyalists of Ali who was the son-
in -law of Mohd. Oomer and Usman were either killed or
died. the Khifafat moved from Mecca to Baghdad,
Damascus, CaWo and finally to Istanbul in Turkey. In
1925 after the Ottoman Empire stood liquidated with
British victory in Europe, Kamal Bin Pasha introduced
radical changes and abolished the Khilafat finally. Some
agitations on this account also took place even in
India, a littler before this time. The Muslims in India
were even backed in this cause by no less a person than
Mahatma Gandhi yet the Khilafat stood finally dissolved
and remians so to date. Islam thus has no Khalifa
appointed any more. Imams in the Mosques only interpret
the Quaran. The Shea sect have different rules. The
Bohri Sheas treat their head as Dahia & hold no one
after Ali as any Imam.

It was during the period of Oomer and Usman

that Quaran as revealed to Mofid. by Gabriel was
actually written down as the holy book of the Muslims.
The Hadiths also came to be recorded as the declared
conduct needed of the Muslims. The Sunni sect of the
Muslims consider only Mohd. as the direct prophet of
Allaha. They also consider Oomer as the NAYABE RASUL
(After Mohd). The other important sect of Islam which
came into being as the party of Ali are called the
Shias. Ali was the Son-in-law of Mohd married to his
daughter Fatima.

Ali came to be accepted as the next Khalifa

after Mohd. It is from him that Islamic religion gets
clevided in two main divisions. Shias are those Muslims
who do not approve Abu Bakr, Oomer and Usman as the
Khalifa after Mohd. They connect Khalifat directly to
Ali who was the son-in-law of Mohd. and who married his
daughter Fatima. Shia sect consider Ali the next Khalifa
after Mohd. After Ali, his son Hasan became the 5 th
Khalifa of the Isamic world. The rivalry for the
succession took one Muavia and his son Yazid in Syria to
claim Khilafat by displacing Hasan. They also had his
son Hussain killed through a pre-planned conspiracy
treacherously carried out. In the sandy desert, Ali's
son and his accompanying guards were killed for want of
water to quench their thirsts. The water containers were
punctured and destroyed by the supporters of Yazid son
of Muavaia. For this reason the Shias do not consider
Muavia and his son Yazid as the successor Khalifas. This
treacherous plan and drama of batle took place at a
place called Karbala in Iraq. For the Sheas, it has
become a holy place and every year as a ritual when the
Sunnis mourm the event for learning about the death of
Hussain whose horse returned without his master on its
back. The Shias too mourn the event which is repeated
every year on the day of Moharram. In most places, a
white horse with blood stains carried on white sheets is
taken in a public procession and the Shea people refrain
from looking at this annually celebrated public occasion
of Moharram. On this day, we in India have repeatedly
seen Sunni/Shia riots and clashes. Even today, Sunnis
beat their chests and bleed themselves by beating their
chests with iron chains etc and walk over the burning
charcoals. They express their cleep-rooted faith in
their religious belief. Islam thus gets divided in two
sets of Sunnis and Sheas. Iraq, Pakistan and India have
most of their Muslim population of the Sunnis while Iran
is mostly composed of the Shia Muslim majority. Both
Sunnis & Shias continue to rever both Mohd. & their holy
book called the Quaran. Shias do not accept Abu Bakr,
Oomer and Usman as succesor Khalifas after Mohd, but the
Sunnis do.

In the valley of Kashmir, there are mixed

Muslims with Sunnis generally over numbering the Shias.
The Bohri Muslim community in and around Mumbai are
mostly the Shias who are just about 3/400 years old
coverts from Hindus. Much similarities of social customs
can be clearly seen in the practices of the Bohri
community and the Hindu religious practices which are
clearly noticeable amongst these people. Even the social
customs in particular of the Momens in Gujarat are
similar to the Hindu system of inheritance of property.
In times to follow, there came into existence Aga Khani
Muslims who are called the Khojas and the Ahmediyas etc.
Some Muslim scholars now declare that there may be as
many as 42 different sects of Indians Muslims. All of
them however accept both Mohd. and the holy Quaran
without question. This singular factor serves as a great
unifying reason to include all Muslims in a separate
fraternity that has come to be called universally as the
'Millat' ( PAN ISLAMIC UNITY).

Pan Islamic concept of Muslim brotherhood is

followed the world over, uniting Muslims of every sect
on the basis of Quranic dictations and what is recoded
in the Hadits. It is the Allaha who speaks his words as.
recorded in Quaran and what he desires to do is provided
in the Hadiths.

Quaran is the last and final world of Allaha

and is beyond amendment. The declarations contained in
it are conveyed through Mohd. who was the last of
Allaha's messengers. After him, no other prophet will
ever be born. Nothing more need be said than what is
already said in the Quaran. Unless all the believers owe
their allegiance to Allaha, Quaran and Mohd. as Allaha's
last messenger, no Islamic fraternal concept is to ever
advance. This is final and beyond any consideration of
any amendment.

A chapter in Quaran deals with social system

and practices. It provides definite directions for the
Muslims to follow. It is fairly exhaustive but not fully
and is called as the SHARIAT. This is unambiguously
stated that all the believers must follo\N their social
dictations without entering into any kind of debate or
argument. What is said therein is by the sanction of
Allaha told by him through the mouth of his messenger
i.e. Prophet Mohd. He is the last and final messenger
sent to the world by Allah and after him, none shall
ever follow for any purpose whatsoever.

This is called as 'Khatme Nawabac'. None

must think or do to amend, add or delete anything
contained in the holy Quaran which is the last and final
message of Allaha, that must bind all messages including
the gospels of the earlier accepted Prophets like Moses
and Jesus and many more. After Mohd. there is nothing
more left for Allaha to tell. With the kind of history
after Mohd.'s death, one will notice, the great mixing
up of religion with politics which is promoted even at
the cost of peace and open murders. The examples set up
are thus adequate in shaping Islam's future that
advocates unabashedly Muslims belief in violence to
spread itself over the whole world. Nothing short of it
has been the aim of any Musalman, a true believer of
Islam.

CHAPTER - IV

CAUSES OF ISLAM'S FAST GROWTH

Most non-Muslims particularly the young

Hindus know very little about Islam. How such a faith
jrew out of sandy deserts of Saudi Arabia, spread so
fast in the world? This is a logical question?

A look at the history of the world shall

convince anyone that the people leading nomadic, tough
life of illiteracy with sword as their companion have
generally been successful in supressing even those
nations that enjoyed superior culture and followed
better styles of civilization. The great Roman Empire
was won over by the Nordic German barbarous people.
Similarly, much of Central Asian territories were
invaded by the tribes of Huns, Mongols and Kushans. They
succeeded to over power the peaceful Chinese, Russians
and the Indian people. This is an undisputed fact of
history.

In the middle of 7th century, the area of

desert around Saudi Arabia lay divided in many tribes,
none of whom had any idea of civilized governance. Mohd.
was successful from Madina to organize a superior force
to bring under his control many of the small tribes of
the Pagans who lived near or close to Mecca. In
comparison to them, people living in Palestine, Egypt
and Iran had developed superior civilizations and better
code of human conduct. One can look at the depature of
the Parsis from Iran and moving to Western Coast of
India seeking refuge against the forces of Islam who
invaded and pushed the Parsis out of Persia or Iran.
This happened about 1000 years ago.

Even poet lqbal writes "Islam was nourished

under the shadow of sword". The religion of Islam
promises heavens to those who die in its cause and
allows open use of the vanquished's possessions. The
main cause of spread of Islarn has been to save one's
life.

All medieval periods invaders to India used

their superior power to not only loot the richness of
India but their main aim had always been to spread
religion of Islam in India. They also brought about
social, cultural, economic and political changes
including governance of the captured terrritories on the
basis of the rules of Islamic Jurisprudence. Even a
murderer could be pardoned if he chose o embrace Islam
and gave up his earlier faith or belief. As for example
a son of one Hindu King by the name of Vikram Singh in
U.P. had murdered another person and was allowed pardon
by the Moghul King in Delhi on his giving up his faith
in Hindu religion and becoming a Muslim. He came to be
renamed as Azam Khan on whose name the city of Azamgarh
was later created.

The important reason of Islams spread in

India is for its belief in rejecting humaneness
andaccpeting and enforcing cruelty in its place. Unlike,
human values of sacrifice and truthfulness followed in
Hinduism, Islam sacrifices and disregards all such human
values and proceeds to enforce at all costs, the message
of Islam as set OLItin Quaran by Mohd. The Hindu ideals
of living in spiritual upliftment by regarding human
values as the divinely ordained are easily negatived by
Islam. Hindus believe in sacrificing their present, to
pursue for Moksha and accept tough conduct like Tapas.
While Hinduism believes in the rebirth of soul, abandons
the worldly comforts, Islam on the other hand sanctions
to its believers, divine orclainments to use all that
the Muslims may loot in course of their victories over
the non-Muslims. This singular reason has been a very
convenient weapon in the hands of the Muslims to win
over other humans. For the reason of promise of heaven
even by restoring to foul conducts like enjoying the
loots from the materials of the vanquished, the MuslimS
do not mind participating in a war called Jehad so that
they either relish the present life as victors or go to
heaven and enjoy there as the Shaheeds. What they get by
way of loot over the vanquished is called A4ale Ganimat
This includes women and children of the vanquished and
are allowed to be used as slaves or be used to satisfy
the lustful conducts of the victorious Muslims. The
Quaran declares nullity of marriages of the defeated
opponents in a Jehad and it is religiously permitted for
the victor Muslims to take even the women of the
opponent losers including the married women on the
opposite side, 1/5th of the loot is to be delivered to
the Khalifa and the balance 4/5th can be used as the
personal property of the Jehadis. The Quaran directs its
followers to wage wars to destroy temples and the idols
which conduct of worshiping idols is termed as Kufr.
Those who are guilty of Kufr are called Kafirs. The
Quaran ordains the believers to behead the Kafirswho
indulge in worshiping idols, wherever they may be found.
It also directs a cruel treatment towards the Kafirs who
must be subjected to pay special tax called the Jazia
for living in Darul lslam. Only then can such non-
believers be allowed to survive as third rate citizens
called the 'Zimmis'.

Sheikh Hamdani while writing his book under the name of

Jasirate-a-ul-mulk has stated the following conditions
to be abided by the Zimmis when living in an Islamic
state which according to him were directed to be
enforced by the third Khalifa namely Oomer

1. The Zimmis shall not erect or create any more

of their own worshiping temples.

2. Any old temple destroyed or demolished is not

permitted to be repaired or recreated.

3. Muslim travellers are permitted to use the

religious temples of the Zimmis as their temporary
abodes.

4. Any Muslim can live in the house of any Zimmi

for 3 days without any objection taken by the Zimmi.

5. No misconduct of such a Muslim traveller

shall be any offence.

6. None may prevent any Zimmi from converting

himself into a Muslim.

7. All Zimmis must respect all Muslims.

8. No Zimmi shall prevent any Muslim from

entering any Zimmi organized conference of any nature.

9. No Zimmi shall keep his name that can confuse

others as if the Zimmi was a Muslim follower.

10. No Zimmi shall use an attire used by the

Muslims and no Zimmi shall be entitled to ride a horse
with saddle and reins.

11. No Zimmi shall ever prossess any sword or

carry any bow and arrow.

12. No Zimmi shall wear on his fingers any sort

of ring, which fashion is reserved solely for the
Muslims.

13. No Zimmi shall consume any liquor or sell the

same.
14. Zimmis must ensure that they continue to wear
only that attire by which they can be distinguished as
non-Muslims.

15. The Zimmis must not spread or follow any

customs that are not followd by the Muslims.

16. No Zimmi must live close to the houses of

Muslims.

17. No Zimmi may dispose off their dead bodies

close to the graveyards of the Muslims.

18. No Zimmi may cry loud to mourn his dead

ancestors.

19. No Zimmi may ever employ any Muslim as his

servant under any circumstance.

20. No Zimmi may help any-spy against the state

of the Muslims and if caught he will be liable to death
and afl his assets shall be condiscated as Male Ganimat.

The above restrictions are said to be the holy

ordainments sanctioned byAllaha who is Almighty, all
powerfull and merciful. It is said in Arabic.

BISMILLAHA, REHMANE RAHIM

GOD IS MERCIFUL

CHAPTER-V
ISLAM'S SPREAD IN INDIA

Men all over the world since time immemorial

have been lustful for the reason of their very creation.
World religions created by men have attempted to keep
under control many of man's natural desires that
particularly included his hunger for sex. In order to
spread Islam, its teachings have exploited this weakness
of man. While a wild man moved higher in civilization to
bring about law of monogamy as his acceptable conduct in
the ever changing society, Islam on the other hand,
religiously sanctioned to its followers four wives
instead of one. A close reading of Islam does
unmistakably point out fully making use of man's nature.
The lowly and debased sort of human nature is fully
exploited to spead Islam. Its use of sword, Jehad and
promise of earthly pleasures in heavens does go a long
way for humans to accept Islam as their faith. Islamic
fraternity and its interse support also went a long way-
to increase the followers of Islam.

On the basis of Prophet Mohd.'s own saying,

Maulana Mohd. Ali, a celebrity of Islamic faith had this
to say for Mahatma Gandhi. "LOWEST AND THE MEANEST OF
EVEN A RAPER BELONGING TO ISLAM IS BETTER THAN MAHATMA
GANDHI, WHO IS NOT A MUSALMAN HIMSELF." Islam considers
weaker sex of women as a commodity meant for the use and
pleasure of men owing allegiance to Islam.'While Islam
was able to totally wipe off even better civilizations
in Egypt, Persia and in other territoires of the Middle
East and Northern Africa, its early spread was finally
checked only in India. Those who embraced Islam in
India, mosity did so under the threat of sword or were
lured into it for its easy promise of heavens where
beautiful women and young kids were promised as rewards
to the believers. Many of ther upper class Hindus
embraced Islam to protect their lives, wealth and
fiefdoms. At present, in the total population of about
100 crores
Indians, there are said to be almost 16
crores of Muslims. This does not include the populations
of Pakistan and Bangladesh who once formed one united
India. India thus inhabits second largest Muslim
population in the world, next only to Indonesia where
too the Muslims find in their social and cultural
systems, traces of Hindu influence.
It has been seen and analyzed that
conversion to Islam in India from the Hindus has been
mostly on account of Muslim atrocities openly practiced
by Rulers like KhiIjis and Aurangzeb who showed no
tolerance and behaved like fanatic despots. The poor
cross section of Hindus lower castes joined Islam on
inducements of money or to save themselves frorn the
strict discipline in the caste system of Hindus. In this
period, untouchability amongst the Hindu castes had also
been born and that was also one amongst other causes
that promoted the spread of Islam in India. It affected
the lower castes considerably.

In Southern India, Hindus were forced to

accept Islamic faith under the sword of both Haider Ali
and his son Tippu. On the Malabar Coast of India and in
the state of Karnataka, Islam spread on account of
compulsion since Tippu and his father Haider Ali scored
military victories over their Hindu rivals. in this
political game, the South of India was also greatly
influenced by the support that the Muslims Rulers in
Delhi gave to the Muslim local chiefs. A case in point
is that of Nizam of Hyderabad who himself was a Muslim
ruling over the majority class of Hindus in this state.

Till about the 14th century end, the state of

Kashmir was dominated by the Bramins. This was won over
by Afghans and later it was greatly influenced by the
Moghuls like Jehangir and Aurangzeb. With the
establishment of the British rule in India the Islamic
spread itself was greatly influenced. A sort of check
took place for some immediate political reasons. Hindu
caste system with some orthodox social practices like
SATI etc. were checked.

Even at present, because of the bad economic

condition within the Hindu society in India, the Hindus
from all over the country look up for getting better
paid jobs in the Gulf Countries of Islamic faith. It is
no more a secret that easily earned oil money in these
countries is being freely used to not only attract
Hindus to go into these countries for jobs but they are
even offered extension of visas for staying there should
they decide to change their faiths from Hinduism to
Islam.

While the modern India is greatly desiring

to bring into force the idea of family planning in order
to check India's growing population, Islam permits the
increase of its number of followers by disregarding such
a national necessity.* Islam accepts its large families
as the gift of the God and opposes any sort of state's
own needs to bring into being any the check on the
otherwise growing populat;on. Even the census of 1991
and 2001 have proven this point without any element of
doubt.

There is in Saudi Arabia an alive state

agency called the Ministry of religious propagation.
That Islamic country provides lucrative funds from own
its resources for spreading Islam in other parts of the
world where the Governments being non-Islamic are termed
as Darul Herb. This has been recently witnessed by the
Islamic terrorists attacking even the most up to date
nation that is the USA. The attack on the two building
of the World Trade Center in New York and later the
continuing spread of Islam policy followed earlier by
Afghan Government led by Osama-Bin-Ladan and Mullaha
Umer are sufficient proofs in themselves. We in India,
have also seen the attack on our Parliament House at New
Delhi and in the very recent past , we have also
witnessed the bloody attacks on Hindu temple at
Ahmedabad. Recent bomb blasts at Mumbai on 28thAugust
2003 are further supporters of clear Islamic plan which
people of India cannot ignore.

For India, it is necessary for any

Government to first ensure that one and only one law in
all matters applies to each of its citizens. In a
democracy that declares itself against theocracy, there
is absolutely no room justified from any angle
whatsoever to tolerate more than one law based on
theocratic beliefs of any cross section of its people.
This is really the suicide of the very belief in
Nationalism and Secularism. It is here that even the
present Government composed of many political partners
needs to be openly condemned for not insisting upon its
citizens to follow only one rule of law under its civil
law code. The Supreme Court of India too has again
asserted their declaration of India adopting only one
civil code for all its citizens. If a criminal procedure
code can be made applicable to one and all, I find no
sense and any reasonable argument to live with separate
personal laws of its widely heterogeneous society. India
will doom if not in the near future but in the present
21st century unless the Goverment in power altered its
stance to enforce one civil code disregarding opposition
to it by anyone and from whomsoever, notwithstanding
'the number of people involved. This is a National need
and unless enforced, holds in its pregnant womb,
symptoms of India itself becoming Darullslam which
continues to be the aim of Pan Islamic Nations. They are
led by Pakistan who has openly declared its support to
Muslims of J & K holding India to ransom for now being
possesed of atomic weapons. This is therefore nothing
short of a political black mail of which Hindus in India
have to take note of.4;If war is checked for reasons of
international politics, let my countrymen be cautioned
that a clash between the civilizaitons has been
predicted by a 1 5th century French philosopher
Norstadam. No more of Hindu timidity should allow the
Islamic world to unite to defeat the Indian Nationalism.
Secularism only means that the state does not-function
on any theocratic beliefs and it does not and cannot
support pseudo secularism practiced as secularism in the
name of multiple Theocracy. If we now fail to take note
of events, the generations shall curse us for not sowing
the right seeds for India to grow in prosperity and we
shall later suffer much more since we have refused and
continue to refuse learning any lessons from the
history.

It is thus appropriate to look at a political concept in

Urdu "LAMHON NE KHATA KI, SAIDION NE SAZAA PAL" (for the
errors of moments, centuries stood punished.)

CHAPTER-VI
VIEWS OF NATIONAL LEADERS ON ISLAM

Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, India's first Law

Minister published one book on 'Thoughts on Pakistan: He
writes as under in that book

"(a) Where there is Darul Herb i.e.

where political govrance is not directly and clearly
under the control of the Muslisms, the Muslims are to
fight to ensure that they remain governed only in
accordance with the rules laid down in Islamic
Jurisprudence. They are ordained to oppose imposition of
any law other than their own personal laws when forced
to live in a territory not controlled by Islarn".
 "(b) Islam divides the world in two
parts and is proud of it. The territory where political
goverance is controlled by Islamic followers is called
Darul Islam and which is not so cotnrolled is called
Darul Herb. In view of this clear understanding, India
can never be a common motherland of Hindus and Muslims
born in India. By divine declaration and design Muslims
in India must fight to change Indian Darul Herb into
Darul Islam even if it means waging a bloody war and
Muslims dying in promoting this cause".

"(c) We must not merely treat the

above as an execrise in academics. Muslims must work and
shall work to finally bring about such demographic
alterations by which the State of India gets Muslim
majority and is governed in accordance with what is
contained in Quaran".

"(d) Indian history records the

Muslims in India planned to invite into India, Muslim
rulers of Afghanistan in the year 1918. The intention
was to organize an internal rebellion against the
British rule opposed solely by the Muslims of india".
Hindus were not to be included in this plan.

"(e) Muslims in India can not only

begin a Jehad but can also invite Muslim rulers from
outside to help them convert India into Darul Islam".

"(f) Every Muslim must be clearly

made to understand that he is a Muslim first and an
Indian national only thereafter."

“(g) Any realist must understand that

Hindus are 'Kafirs' and they are to be beheaded unless
they convert into Islam".

“(h) No realist can ever accept the

continuing loyalty of Muslim troops in Indian forces
towards India and disregard the factor of Muslims
suddenly changing their loyalty to support any kind of
struggle backed by Pan Islarnic agenda".

“(i) It matters not if the Hindus on

the sub-continent are more in number than the Muslims.
By nature, Hindus are coward and timid and one Muslim
person is said to equal ten Hindus and hence fear them
not is the religious dictation by the Islamic clergy to
the Muslims living in India."

“(j) Dr. Ambedkar writes "While many

debased ideas of Hinduism may be found in the Islamic
society of India, what is worst is the treatment Islam
gives to its women by dire cting them to live under a
veil".
 (k) There is no possibility now or
hereafter to evolve a common and peaceful society of
Hindus and Muslims, living together in peace.

(l) No Muslim can ever accept

secularism as the common denominator of society. He
rejects any kind of Nationalism.

(m) Muslims may not support any

counter view since the same is irreligious and suicidal
to the very spirit of Islam.

(n) As per Quaranic disctations, "Any

non-believer is worthy only of hate, disassoication and
be murdered more so if he holds belief in idol
worshiping. A Muslim who beheads an idol worshiper is
dear to Allaha and is to be respected as a Ghazi" (Even
the secular Akbar the great, beheaded his opponent Hemu
in the 2nd battle of Panipat.

(o) A Muslim must not deviate on

account of advancement in science from his real belief
in Allaha and whose last Prophet on earth is Mohd.
Muslims must strongly assert themselves even at the cost
of their lives and wage a war or a holy Jehad if
necessary or when opposed. An opposer must be punished
with death even when he surrenders. This is the order of
Allaha.

(p) Indian can never be a common land

to live in freedom available to both Hindus and Muslims.
This is the strict belief of the Muslims who must
prepare themselves for the final attack and their
victory over the Hindus.

Much more than what is stated above in

brief, in fact has been written by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
who himself converted to Buddhism at about the time just
before his death.

Mrs. Annie Beasant an Irish lady of the

Theosophical Society states "Indian leadership
unnecessarily suffered by opposing abolition of Khilafat
in Turkey. (This refers to Mahatama Gandhi's support to
Muslims in India when the British succeeded in
abolishing Khilafat by a Turkish leader by the name
Kamal Pasha). Muslims in India continue to entertain
great hatred towards humanity that includes Hindus. They
unabashedly state and justify Islamic conduct of
proselytization on the point of sword. The world is
watching the spread of Islam all around the world. The
Muslims acclaim that none in the world not belonging to
Islam will be allowed to pollute the holy land of Islam
in Middle East by stepping their feet on it. Should the
Muslims of Afghanistan decide to attack India, the
Muslims in India are divinely bound to suupport such an
attack and to drive away the Britons from the soil of
India that should be politically taken over by the
Muslims only. The Hindus deserve to be killed and be
treated as the servants of the Muslims, which is the
cause of their sufferance for not believing in Allaha
and his Prophet Mohd. This was the declared policy of
Indian Muslims in the year 1918, when a plan was hatched
to invite Afghans to invade India for thowing away the
British Imperialism.

Lala Lajpatrai said "For the last six months

I have spent my time in studying History and Muslim
jurisprudence. I am compelled to think and declare that
it is absurd to imagine Hindu / Muslim unity in India,
ever. I may like to trust the present Muslim leaders but
I cannot deceive myself from not correctly understanding
what is contained in Quaran and in the Hadits of Mohd.
No Muslim leaders dare defy the same."

Ravindranath Tagore said "The impossibility

of Hindu / Muslim unity in India is based on Muslim
belief in Pan Islamic fraternity and this relegates
Indian Nationalism for Muslims. No Muslim can ever limit
his absolute allegiance to his country or even to his
own Nationalism. He survives by being continuosly brain
washed to owe allegiance to international Muslim
brotherhood, the nucleus of which is located in Saudi
Arabia. No Muslim can stand up and fight another Muslim
nation".

Mahatma Gandhi said "Muslim by nature is

made a bully. Hindu by nature is timid and peace loving.
I cannot agree to alter my belief in non-violence even
when the Muslims in India resort to unwanted barbaric
conducts against the Hindus. The time will come and I
pray to God to bring a change in the style of human
thought that respects Non - violence as a human habit".
This is indeed a true style of Hindu thought but can it
be any more tolerated, is the question?

Jawaharlal Nehru said "On the floor of Lok

Sabha while talking on Kashmir, even if the world
settles issue of Kashmir in favour of Pakistan, they
will yet find another cause to disturb India and her
peace for this is natural for them and is most unnatural
for India and the Hindus in India".

MR. MOHD. ALI JINNHA'S VIEWS

While addressing a Muslim league assembly at Lahore in
the year 1940, Mohd. Ali Jinhha in his Presidential
address said :

"Muslims in India are an independent nation that does

not and cannot include Hindu Indians in it. I am at a
loss to understand the inability of Hindu leadership's
understanding this singular fact. Hindus and Muslims are
not merely two separate religions. They are two
distinctly different social systems. To visualize Hindus
and Muslims in India uniting to create a common nation
is a mythical concept. It is only a fancy dream of some
unawakened Hindu leaders. The mutual hatred between the
two socieites has already crossed the permissible limits
and this is now the sole cause of the people of India
and its rulers the Britons to understand it. While we
stand on this cross road, let no further time be lost in
acknowledging this truth or else the total India itself
will be ruined. Hindus and Muslims follow two different
religious ideologies and two different social systems.
They neither like to live or eat together or to marry
into each others communities. The truth is that Hindus
and Muslims are two different civilizations. They also
entertain great mutual differencs and hatred towards
each other since their thought processes grow on
different beliefs. They also draw their respective
inspirations from two different sources of History. They
have their different religious books and different
religious leaders. Hindus in India out number the
Muslims. Hence, no common Nationalism can ever be built
by the common effort of Hindus and Muslims. Should any
contrary effort by made, it will only result in the
disturbance of peace. If inspite of this clear vision
before me, any effort is ever made to draw out a common
Constitution for Hindus and Muslims shall soon throw
such a Constitution meant only for some dirty basket".

CHAPTER - VII

ISLAMIC JEHAD OR TERRORISM

To wage a holy war called Jehad is amongst

the basic principles advocated strongly by Prophet Mohd.
According to him, there does not exist any chance of
world peace unless the world as a whole is converted
into Darul Islam. He has himself unabashedly announced
the division of the world into two camps of believers
and the non-believers. Similarly, the Islamic religion
does not abhor violence, but on the other hand, openly
justifies and directs its believers to rely on their
strength that is intended to be used for the anihiliaton
of the people who resist such a violent attack on their
own faiths or religion.

On reading of a recently published book in

English by one Brigadier Malik "Quaranic Concept of
War", one learns that Jehad for Muslims is the direction
of Allaha to destroy the non-believers totally. It is
not at all necessary that those directed to be killed be
first found as being guilty of something like violating
human rights. This itself, according to the book, is a
sufficient offence, not to be a follower of Islam.
According to the author, Allaha promises heavens to the
Muslims who proceed to wage a Jehad and indulge into
destruction of humans not owing allegiance to Islam.
Allaha freely sanctions by his divine authority, murder
of the non-belivers and cruel treatment to them. He
further permits the Jehadis to put into their own use
even the married women of the opponents and treat the
children of the vanquished opponents as slaves or at the
pleasure of the Jehadis. There is no Quaranic diction or
any direction in any Hadit to take non-believers as the
prisoners of war. Such captives, because of their non-
belief and offer of resistance, is itself a sufficient
sin to be beheaded under the sword of the believers.

Prophet Mohd. himself has gone to record to

say that he lives on the loot of such properties that
belonged to the non-belivers. He entitled himself to
Male Ganimat and is on record taking captured women in
his harem. Even a son, by the name of Ibrahim was born
out of one such woman by the name of Moria. But he died
when he was very young. In order to truly understand the
psyche of the Muslims, one must look at this book's
contents that clearly advocattes spread of terrorism in
the world for promoting the cause of Islam. One
therefore need not wonder as to what happened on 11th
Sptember, 2001 in New York when the Islamic terrorists
destroyed the two buildings of World Trade Centre and
attempted to attack the central military H.Q. buidling
of the United States of America located at Washington
(DC). According to the author, terrorism and spread of
Islam are ordained to march hand in hand in order to
destroy the opposition and to frighten those who do not
subscribe to the thought of Allaha as stated by Mohd.

Terrorism according to Brigader Malik is an

essential weapon that must be used before Jehad is
commenced if not for anything else but to demoralize the
nonbelievers in Islam. A foreword to this book is
provided by the ex-President and Military General of
Pakistan who was Zia-Ul-Haq. He died in an air crash.
Even the present dictator of Pakistant as the President
of the country has announced the state policy of
Pakistant to support Islamic Jehadwhenever and wherever
fought. One can therefore see an integral bond between
Terrorism and Jehadthat finds its first source of origin
in the holy book of Quaran.

Islam and terrorism cannot be separated.

This is discovered from the pages of History. It is
therefore important to understand the Muslims psyche who
hold faith in Terrorism that in turn goes to support the
concept of war or Jehad. The ideology of Islam therefore
is less of any human religion based on the need of
welfare of the world of humanity. It is really a
political campaign of Islamic invasion of the entire
world and unless this is finally achieved, the believers
are religiously ordained to wage a Jehadand are
permitted to take support of Terrorism.

ISLAM IS THEREFORE A CONCEPT OF POLITICAL

INVASION OF THE WORLD BY MUSLIMS
LET THE WORLD NATIONS AND ITS LEADERS TAKE NOTE OF IT

CHAPTER - VIII

ISLAM IS ARAB NATIONALISM

98% of Muslims in India are converts from

Hindus. While Islam unambiguously ordains upon its
followers all over the world to recognize only Mohd. as
its last Prophet and abandon every connection of any
alternative nature with their past, yet belief in its
ideology includes at least one visit to Mecca for, Haj.
By this method Islam instills amongst its followers a
permanent bondage with the Arabs. Hence, those who
convert to Islam not only alter their earlier styles of
God remembrance, but they also proceed to divert their
Nationalism towards Mecca in the Arab world. One can
learn more about this reality by going through the books
written by Islamic scholar one Mr. Anwar Sheikh who
published the following two works on Islam highlighting
the above conclusions. The books are 1. ISLAM THE ARAB
NATIONALIST MOVEMENT and 2. ISLAM THE ARAB IMPERIALISM.
The books finally conclude that Arab Nationalism drives
its followers towards Arabic culture and to spread and
use in its way every activity that includes violence. A
few of the salient true features appropriate to Islam
need to be grasped.

1. Prophet Mohd. himself declared to be the

messenger of God. The tribe in which he was born
(Querish) was the superior most tribe of the Pagans. The
land of Arabia was singularly the ideal Nationalism.

2. What he said and which came to be later

recorded in Muslims holy book Quaran is the last word of
Allaha.

3. Mohd. declared Kaba ( the round black stone)

as the only idol that was given to the Arabs by Allaha.

4. Kaba that was even earlier recognized as the

holy place for the Pagans was reasserted as the holy
place of Islam. Who so ever should embrace Islam must
also simultaneously declare his belief in Kaba and in
the Arab superiority meaning Arab Nationalism as well.
5. Muslims anywhere in the world are ortained to
bow five times in a day by ritually offering Namaz
through observance of rituals that impress upon its
followers paying obeisances to the Arab territory of
Kaba. The holy Namaz is to be offered by facing towards
Mecca.

6. Every Muslim as a matter of ritual must visit

Kaba at least once in his life time. Kaba is thus made
the symbol of Arab nationalism that must be followed by
all follower's of Islam. This automatically cuts off the
followers earlier connections with their own nation and
in its place, the new belief promotes and altogether
different kind of loyalty in the matter of one's
Nationalism.

7. Mohd. built only around himself the sole

center, an ideal model for the Muslims to follow him as
the believers in Islam. The way to heavens for the
mortals born on earth passed only through his
declarations and all other approaches were declared as
Kufr

8. Islam therefore turned itself into the only

sanctioned way to reach the abode of God where worldly
pleasures left behind by the mortals shall be available
to those who follow Mohd. and his declared path. There
is very little said of human philosophy and the creation
from the point of view of spirituality in the holy book
of Quaran.

9. Quaran came to be written in Arabic. This

built immediately an Arab center that was considered as
the revealer of the only path to reach the heavens. All
non-Arabs who chose to convert to Islam and provide
strength to the Arab Nationalism indeed was by itself a
great service done by Mohd. to himself, to the Arabs, to
the language of the Arabs i.e. Arabic and to bring in
its fold all the followers anywhere on the globe. Any
Muslim even today openly professes his faith in Islam as
declared by Mohd. by unabashedly relegating his loyalty
to the family in which he may have been born when
compared to the declarations of Mohd. This was a grand
design really political in character on which Muslims
could advance their cause of expansionism by combining
religion with ultimate success in this political aim.
Hence this book is tittled as ISLAM - A CONCEPT OF
POLITICAL WORLD INVASION BY MUSLIMS.

The above followings are the real basis of

Arab nationalism. Mohd. successfully united Arab cause
containing its language and its culture to be
acknowledged by one and all as the superior most
declared through him by Allaha himself. No hesitation is
seen in the declarations of Islam who clearly condemn
and negate any other faith or dogma dealing with
religion of spirituality as total falsehood. He went to
record those who did not believe in Islam as Kafirs
(unwanted by Allaha) and any belief held in the
alternative as Kufr. He divided the society in believers
and non-believers. He also divided the nations and the
world in two distinct parts. The division as can be seen
is done on the basis of political control. Those nations
who did not rule as per Islamic doctrine are termed as
the hated Darul Herb and those who are governed by
Muslims under Islamic doctrine are termed as Allaha's
loved nations as Darul Islam. He declared himself as the
last of Allaha's messenger sent to the earth and what he
said, did and recorded in Quaran as the last word of
Allaha that cannot be touched, amended or altered ever
after him since Allaha had no further message left to
give to the mortals born on earth.

CHAPTER - IX

MUSLIM PROBLEM IN INDIA

To understand the problem of Muslim in

India, a peep intol the past history of India is
essential. Altough, it is not wihtin the scope of this
book to analyze the effect of Islam in India from the
year 712 ownwardsm, yet one cannot ignore the
essentialities in order to truly understand the present
day problem of Muslims in India. This does include,
unfortunately role of Muslims in organizing Terrorism in
India and using Muslims in India even to spread
Terrorism in other parts of the world. One cannot forget
the Islamic psyche that revolves around violence for
spreading its message and its cause.

Mohd. - Bin - Kaism was the first Muslim

invader who invaded the territory of Sind in India in
the year 712 which at that time was mostly populated by
Buddhists. He carried out the slaughter of all adults
over the age of 17 unless they agreed to give up their
faith in Buddhism and embraced Islam. The local king
Dahir was killed and his wife and son Jai Singh
committed self-immolation in a fort near Karachi. The
two young princesses namely Suraja and Panna bhai were
captured alive and were seni as presents to the Kha rifa
at Bhagdad. It is said that even MohdBin-Kasim was
ordered to be killed and his body sown in the ox hide
skin was forwarded to the Khalifa n Bhagdad as per his
orders The first invasion lasted for a little time until
later i.e. 200 years thereafter, further Islamic
invasions on India took place from the Turkish States in
Central Asia. This finally gave birth to the rules of
Saltnats and later to the Moghul Empire at Delhi.
 One thing that stands clear from the history
is that the mair purpose of such Islamic military
invasions was not merely to locl the riches of India but
these attacks were essentially directed to spread the
very doctrine of Islam in India. The present day problem
of Muslims in India in reality is the conitnuation of
the very same process that began in India almost 1200
years ago. Islamic dcotrine is totally political. The
very concept of Islam and its continuation is nothing
else but a continuing political invasion of earlier
India and expanding Islam, in the present day India of
the 21st century. As far as dogmatic assertions of
Islamic theology are concerned, no change whatsoever has
taken place in them and hence the destructive attitude
of its followers and newer converts into it, cannot be
ignored without once again looking at the clictations of
Islam. There is no scope whatsoever for any one to ever
differ or to amend the Quaranic clictations. With the
changes taking place in time and also in the world
scenario, Islam's basic philosophy remains static. While
the science greatly casts its impact on the lives of the
people on earth, Islam does not undertake to alter its
original stand that was born in the middle of the V1
century AD under Mohd. It continues to have its main and
only aim to convert the entire world into Darul Islam
and nothing be spared unless this finality is achieved.
The recent attack on the Parliament of India is clear
reassertion of Islam's unaltered attitude. This
observation is further strengthened by the statements of
Osama-Bin-Laden of AI-Queida who found worldwide support
of Muslims. India cannot afford to ignore or neglect to
take note of this attiude of Islam that threatens Hindu
way of life in India. Looking at the acts of terrorism
in USA, Indonesia, the design of Islam is openly
revealed.

Islam does not accord equality to any other

system political or religious, social or cultural and
directs world's social and ,economic systems to follow
the original plan as was announced by Mohd. and is
recorded in Quaran and the Hadits. It has its own system
of Islamic Jurispurdence to dispense justice that has
not undergone any change in either its civil or criminal
matters, notwithstanding how the world itself has
changed in the last 1200 years. No non-Muslim is equal
to a Muslim and all Muslims are ordained never to trust
any non-Muslim or to ever befriend them. No Muslim in a
Muslim state is worthy to be considered for any
responsible job on behalf of the state and none be ever
enrolled as an army solider in any state of Islam. The
non -Muslim must be subjected to special taxes and are
ordained to be treated with cruelty as a matter of rule.
They are termed as the Zimmis' by which word is implied
the hated non-believer. Islam is not a religion that
permits tolerance. Non-belief in Islam is itself a
sufficient offence for an Islamic believer to kill any
non-believer and he who resists enfrocement of Islamic
faith upon the non-believers must be beheaded. Wherever
Islam went on the strength of sword, it chose to behead
the opposers that included children and women as well.
Women are meant for the joy and pleasure of the men of
Islam and are allowed to be so used on an islamic
invasion scoring military victories.

Islam even destroyed valuable world records

contained in world libriaries only because the Islamic
victors apprehended such libraries contained thoughts
and ideas not acceptable or not in accordance with the
Islamic theology. The libraries at Sikandrya in Egypt,
Taxila, Vikramsheel and Nalanda in India were burnt only
because no opposing view or an idea even in the field of
science that did not find prior sanction of Islam could
be tolerated. Darul Islam came to be created wherever
Islamic forces captured territory. Where they filed, the
struggle to win was kept going. Hence, even in India of
today, this Islamic invasion by the deifnition of its
original concept continues. We cannot forget how
Bangladesh was created by the help of Indian forces.
Originally it was declared as a secular country. Later
however, in a very short time, it converted itself into
anohter Darul Islam. The same struggle is now going on
even within India that stands glaringly visible to the
world in the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Where the people resented being governed by

Isalmic victors, the re-enters were either pushed out or
they chose to run away to save their own lives. One
cannot forget the period of last 1400 years, when the
world itself was not scientifically advanced. The advnce
in science over the globe owes its real beginning only
in about last 350/400 years. Prior to this, the world
itself especially in the Middle East and areas around
lacked everything that the present day world provides.
The communications were difficult and the victors dealt
cruel blows upon the civilized beings. Even earlier
invaders like Huns, Mongols/ Kushans and latter the
Islamic followers trampled on these areas of the globe
to wipe off the better civilizations in countries like
Egypt and Persia. From Persia, escaped some Caravans of
the Parsis who took refuge in India to save their lives
form the Islamic slaughter.

India itself came under the Islamic

conquests from 712 to 1192 AD. further efforts were also
made to go in the Southern direction of the Indian sub-
continent. In the 16 th century, a beginning was made by
Sher Shah Suri who himself had Afghan blood in him but
had learnt a lot in state management from Raja Todarmal
of Chunia, aTehsil in Lahore distirct. Amongst the
Moghul rulers, Akbar alone inspite of his illiteracy
showed better tollerance towards the locals in India. He
too is on record beheading Hemu, the vanquished King in
the 2 n' battle of Panipat in order to become a Ghazi.
However, his son and grand son failed to follow his
initiated policy of tolerance towards the Hindus. It is
a part of Moghul history in India when the religional
revolts of significant nature grew in all directions of
the Indian sub-continent and how the Moghul empire
itself uIltimately ended with the British Crown taking
over the entire India after crushing India's first
battle of independence in the year 1857. Muslims in this
battle fought for the Islamic rule & not for real Indian
Nationalism. This has been a historical tragedy.

Regional leaders like Tanitya Tope at Kanpur

bravely fought against the British and registered their
claims with the British crown who finally took the whole
of India from the hands of Hindus and Muslims rulers,
both. Muslims thus failed to serve the real National
struggle in the name of secular India.

Muslim problem in India at this juncture

took another shape. The British desired to rule over,
India by exploiting the religious differences between
the majority Hindus and the miniority Muslims. To begin
with, even the British really failed to understand the
Muslim psyche based solely on Quaran. The greater
failure of true understanding later resulted in some
important political blunders of India's Hindu leaders
like Mahatma Ghandi and Jawaharlal Nehru. Indian
Nationalism could not be sufficiently aroused to the
needed degree aginst the British Imperialism because of
not only lack of resources and funds but on the account
of the very inherent weakness of Nationalism into which
the Muslims never fully and honestly participated. Hindu
leaders at no time took this fact intotheir pragmatic
planning. It is in the annals of history that the
Muslims in fact considered even conspiring against the
soil of India. They clsired to drive away the British
from its soil by inviting Afghanistan to invade India by
relying upon the strength of Muslims within India. Yet,
the Hindu leadership of Nehru and Gandhi failed to take
into account the real Islamic plan of converting India
into Darul Islam. They disregarded the lessons of
history. These leaders really failed even to understand
the psychology of Islam from the Hindus. Such converts
had lost even the minimum love from the Hindus. They
were ready to prove their loyalty to the new religion by
supporting even the Pan Islamization by becoming
themselves as the 5 th Columnist favouring the Islamic
invaders. The Hindu leaders sorrily played in the hands
of the British and also failed to unite even the Hindu
Indian population as one nation desiring to throw away
the British yoke and to earn freedom for the whole lot
of Indian population as one nation. Muslims, as was
stated frankly by Jinnah that they could not co-exist
with Hindus under any common Constitution continued to
hold this view steadfastly. This fact failed to register
in the minds of Hindu politicians.

India is an old nation with its own grand

culture and traditions. It has its own past glorious
history and culture. It is the only nation that can
proudly acclaim its unparalleled culture. None in the
world could ever surpass the grandeur of past India.
Hence, no mixed nation of people was warranted to be
formed unlike the USA where there were diferent
political states and many battles including civil wars
had to be won to finally draw out one common
Constitution of that country to bring about the United
States of America. India could never be expected to be
united with Muslims who are divinely directed to keep
themselves aloof of the Kufrand the Kafirs. This problem
existed then and it continues to exist even today when
in spite of the partition of the Indian sub-continent
into two sovereign countries of India and Pakistan, the
problem of Muslims in India haunts India in its face
showing further signs of balkanization. Hindus are the
idol worshippers and Muslims are ordained to kill the
idol worshippers as the worst enemies of Islam. The
Quaranic instruction on this point has not undergone any
change.

For the Islamic world, creation of Pakistan

and Bangladesh is a definite accomplishment towards
creating Darul I slams out of DarulHei-bs. The battle
for further invasion of the Darul Herb in India
continues. Our national leaders like Mr. Gandhi and Mr.
Nehru both failed whereas Mr. Jinnah indeed succeeded.
One cannot but admit this fact of history, which is as
clear as the sun shining on a clear day in the skies.
Regretfully, this naked expression of Muslims reality is
not being dealt with even by the present Government with
its Hindu leaders like Atal Bihari Vajpayee and L.K.
Advani. May be this book awakens them.

Our leaders thought that they had ended the

problem of Mulims in India by accepting the division of
the country including after swallowing the prominently
announced Gandhi slogan "PAKISTAN CAN ONLY BE BORN ON MY
CHEST ". But for the Hindus and their ancient glory in
social and cultural fields, Islam failed to Cover whole
of India with its own theology as tney had done in Egypt
and Persia. This continues to remain as the sore point
in the Muslim world. Muslims on the sub-continent
continue to lie in wait till this change too can be
brought about. In due course if Pakistan and Bangladesh
were to merge into India, Muslim population will
seriously dominate Hindu politics of today.

In reality, while the British might have

made use of Hindu/ Muslim conflict in India to
manipulate their imperialistic designs, it will be wrong
to say that the problem of Muslims in India was created
by the British. If that was so, the problem of Muslims
ought to have ended with the division of the country
into India and Pakistan. The Indian leaders thought
although wrongfully, that with the exit of the British
from India and with the creation of an independent state
of Pakistan, Indians could live in peace as an
independent nation itself. How wrong such a political
calculation was is now for anyone to see and how the
Indian national Congress under the leadership of Nehru
and Gandhi miserably failed? The slogan of
AkhandHindustan as was made by the Congress leaders
stands as an example of admission of Indian leadership's
total failure. Can anyone ever deny it?

Had we succeeded in making India strong and

had we succeeded in ending the problem of Muslims in
India, one could have perhaps read that part of Indian
history with some sort of consolation. But while
Pakistan and Bangladesh stand created by becoming
Islamic nations, we in India inspite of being majority
of Hindus live in fear under the continuing threat of
terrorism nourished and patronized by our Islamic
neighbours. Sorrily, we still do not appear to have
learnt any good lesson from the past history and still
expect that Muslim in India shall agree to call
themselves Indians first and Mulims later. We still feel
that with the declared liberal constitution of India, we
will able to hold the plurality of India as one strong
Indian nation. It is nothing but a kind of PSEUDO
SECULARISM that shall never allow any Muslim to neglect
his singular or collective role of being a true member
of Pan Islamization only. He awaits his correct time of
aciton as he has waited in the past. Hindus ought to
WAKE UP.

I gratefully acknowledge and appreciate the

views of former MP Professor Balraj Madhok who has
written on this subject some grand literature in English
and Hindi which needs to be read by all lovers of India
and her ancientism. Professor Balraj Mahclok was also
one of the early Presidents of the Jan Singh who went
into making a party, to oppose the Congress of Indira
Gandhi by the name of Janata Party. Its first Prime
Minister was Morarji Desai and his prominent comrades in
those days were Choudary Charan Singh, Atal Bihari
Vajpayee, L.K. Advani, Raj Narayan, Georgre Fernandez,
Madhu Limayee and many more. The party soon split for
its internal discohesion and what came out of it was not
what went into it originally as the Jan Sangh. An
altogether new party with old names of Atal Bihari
Vajpayee and L.K.Advani came out of it wiith the new
name of BJP. Regretfully, not only they left and
marginalized Professor Balraj Mahdok, one of the
original thinkers and a senior member but the new party
also deviated from their original and declared policy of
saving India i.e. Bharat Mata as the legitimate
claimants being the descendents of the original race of
the Aryans. They are Hindus who love this country as
their ancestors did respecting its ancientism, its
social traditions and glorious culture of the past. The
original sa ron flag of BJS and its election symbol of
Deepak was also given up the BJP.

It has got to be said and accepted for

the reasons of Quaranic dictations and assertions, that
the Muslims even though born on the soil of India unless
they settle to reorientate some of the Quaranic
dictations, shall always be looked at with suspicion.
There are some noticeable exceptions but let us not
forge that

EXCEPTIONS DO NOT MAKE RULES

CHAPTER-X
OLD MUSLIM PROBLEM IN INDIA RESURFACING -
CAUTION TO INDIA

After 1000 years, the old Muslim problem

has resurfaced in India of which due caution must be
taken or else the Indian way of life which is nothing
other than Hindu way of life shall stand permanently
buried. What are the causes for resurfacing of Muslims
attitude more so when in the year 1947, the sub-
continent was divded in,two independent states. The
Muslims got what they wanted which is 30% of the grand
land of Indian sub ~ continent. One may look at the
history of the world to discover if at all there is any
other such example where centuries old Hindu
civilization settled for its own freedom by foregoing a
grand portion of tis own land. There could never be
another example of the total failure of the political
leadership that took in hand such an issue and failed
miserably in protecting the interests of the majority
community of the Hindus in India. Indian leaders of the
Congress were in a hurry to capture seats and political
powers. They have gone on record for compromising with
the fundamental beliefs of the Hindus.

The further tragedy in proof of political blunders made

by the Indian National Congress of 1947 is in seeing the
resurfacing of this problem in India. Let us not forget
that with the advancement in science, we in India and
our neighbours in Pakistan believing in different
religious ideologies, opens doors of confrontation with
each other. For the reasons of their faith in Islamic
theology, we are now also endangered by military attacks
of atomic bombs. An answer to this question has also to
be simultaneously found. To discover and face the
realities as they exist, we have first to discover the
reasons which are:
 Lack of knowledqe of Islam :

The failure of political leadership in India

has made the present state worse than what existed in
1947. The leadership failed to caution the public of the
correct and unamendable aims of Islam. It is universally
followed by the Muslims all over. It can be easily found
out that the roots of this problem go down to Prophet
Mohd.'s own role in delivering to the world what is
contained in Muslims holy book Quaran and how it is to
be acted upon in his declared Hadits. Even the Hindu
intelligentsia failed with India's political Leaders to
truly understand the long term aim of Islam. Hence, no
proper precautions were taken even when the Congress
leadership agreed to divide the land of the sub-
continent between India and Pakistan.

Islam is very much unlike other religious

faiths that emphasizes improvements in interse human
conducts believing in the true nature of man, which is
both benevolent and joyful. Islam is not merely an
alternative way of God worship. It is a complete
political code of expansionism to bring under it the
entire world. It not only hates or discards any other
way of life fit for the huannans on the earth but in
fact openly sanctions waging of the bloody wars and to
behead the opponents to it. It is a political doctrine.
Mohd. its Prophet, made himself the nucleus of the
Islamic faith that was born in Saudi Arabia in the
middle of 7th century. Mohd. himself led over 26 out of a
total of 82 small and big wars called Jehads fought for
the spread of Islamic faith all over the world. Islam
clearly divides the world society in two camps of
believers and the non believers. It announces an endless
war until the entire world has been militarily won over
by Islam. Its clear message is contained in its holy
book the Quaran that can never be altered and it
delivers the final message of Allah as stated by Mohd.
and is contained in this book. Some of the expressions
used in this text are already referred to in this
publication are once again stated. These are Millat a n
d Kufr, Darul Islam and Darul Herb. Muhajid and
Muhadeen, Shahid and Ghazi are some of the further
expressions that need to be understood before one can
realize the real meaning of Islam which word
paradoxically means 'Peace' in the Arabic Language.

It is note-worthy that in the last 1400

years after its birth, Muslim have not been able to live
in peace with any other community of humans owing faith
to any other religious belief. Where the political
control of a territory is not in the hands of the
Muslims or the territory is governed under any other
ideology, the territory is termed as Darul Herb. All
Muslims are religiously ordained to die (or become
Shaheeds) to convert Darul Herbs into Darul Islams. No
Muslim is to consider any non-Muslims as equal to him
and none may befriend anyone not believing in Islam.

Many historians like Arnold Toyamba, Will

Durant, Jadunaath Sarcar and H.G.Wales had to write
admitting that the conduct of Muslim rulers in India was
founded in the dictation of Islam as contained in Quaran
and Hadits. Unless one first educated oneself about
Islam and its literature, one would fail to grasp the
cause of cruelty meted to the local Hindus of India by
the victorious Muslims invaders from the North West of
India. The British Imperialism in India came to
understand the impossibility of Hindu/ Muslim co-
existence and hence they shaped their own strategy of
ruling over India by exploiting this clear difference
between the large populations of Hindus and Muslims.
Muslim league, a political party of the Muslims came to
be founded in the year 1905. The very next year i.e.
1906, Aga Khan a religious leader of a crosssection of
Muslim society met Lord Minto and demanded separate
political rights for the Muslims as electorates while
efforts were being made to train Indians into working a
Western style of political goverance. The British took
the fullest advantage of such diifferences that shall
always surface and prevent Indians becoming a
homogeneous nation demanding freedom from the British.
Hence, in conclusion, it can be said that the early
leadership of India under the Indian National Congress
totally failed to realize the realities facing India.
They neglected to note that the confronation of Muslims
against Nationalism had its roots in Muslim's holy book
Quaran and no compromise or immediate agreement between
the Hindus and Muslims of India could ever be drawn for
taking any permanent advantage including ensuring in
India, an all time peace. To a very great extent, the
unalterable mentality of Muslim and lack of its
realization with the Hindu leadership has contributed to
the present Muslim problerii of India.

Neglecting to affect exchanqe of population on the

partition of India

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar writing in his book on

'Thoughts on Pakistan' published in the year 1946
clearly justifies an agrument of India and Pakistan
exchanging their respective religious populations. Both
Gandhi and Nehru ridiculed this sugestion that had found
favour both with Sardar Patel and Rajagopalachari.
Dr.Ambedkar was both a lawman and an intellectual
historian. He clearly foresaw that Hindu population in
Pakistan will be brutally killed or will be converted to
Islam. The time has already proven his point. Even
Jinnah was inclined to accept this proposal. However,
holding myopic view of the political situation, Gandhi
and Nehru rejected the idea of which, we can now see its
effects. In the Western Pakistan, there were 23%
population of Hindus at the time of partition of the
country. Not even 1% of Hindu population survives in
Pakistan. In Bangladesh, there was 30% Hindu population
which has now come down to only 12%. In fact, Hindu
leaders went out of their way to have the departing
Muslims dismbark from the trains going to Pakistan from
India. Such a phenomena has also been filmed and shown
in a film called Garam Hawa. While Bangladesh and
Pakistan have settled their Hindu problem once and for
all, we in India for the failure of our leadership
remain stuck up with this sordid problem that could have
been solved but is left with us even at the cost of yet
another demand that may be made of another Darullslal-n
from the present territory of Hindu country. Demand for
another Mughalastan is already being talked of. Refer
chapter XXIV of this book.

Constitutional flaws :

We all know that our present Constitution iis basically

a reproduction of British made Government of India Act,
1935. We have added to it some provisions from the
Constitutions of USA,

USSR, FRANCE, IRELAND and GERMANY Many

provisions in this Constitution like Article 30, 44 and
370 are unwarranted by virtue of which alone the problem
of Muslims in India has resurfaced. Once again the blame
for such lack of appreciation of situation squarely
falls at the door of the leadership of Indian National
Congress. They never could see through the evil
possibilities for the good future of India. Once again I
have to repeat and say "LAMHON NE KHATA KI, SADION NE
SAZAA PAI" (for the errors of moments, centuries stood
punished).

India is an ancient country with its vast

land mass. It was not formed like USA as the United
States of India. Its vastness had one common feature of
Hindutva. This ought have been fully exploited in the
last 50 years or more. We however seem to have tilted in
abandoning the desired political unity of the country
but instead we drifted to bite the Muslim bait in
applauding the differences in Indian society by admiring
its diversity and plurality. This singular reason has
greatly contributed once again in resurfacing the Muslim
problem before us. Indeed it is a very serious issue
that can no more be casually dealt with.

Our Constitution begins in the name of India

i.e. Bharat. I fail to understand as to why the name of
the country as was existing ever before and in fact
still continues to exist as HIndustan , was not added
along with India and Bharat. This could have had a
meaning to unite whole of India in the name fo Hindus.
This could definitely make a psychological difference
and why was it abandoned remains to date a question that
defies reasonable answer? In fact, India is not even a
federation where people and states with divided
loyalties in regions arre brought together for some
superior purpose of existence. Hindustan has been a
recognized coutnry or a Nation since times immemorial.
It is the egoistic mind of the then Congress leaders who
defined the nature in the name of some sort of imagined
secularism. All the time, the leadership was obsessed
wiith their old design to consider Hindus and Muslims in
India as one Nation. Even the partition of the country
brought about on the basis of two separate nations for
the reason of difference in religions did not seem to
have altered the thought process of Congress leadership.
We now have to face and pay the price of wrong political
decisions done by our earlier leaders. Readers may again
look at the clearly expressed views of Mr. Jinnah.

The overall structure of the Constitution of

India is to protect and pamper the minorities, the
largest of which is the Muslim community. With our
failure to look into their real ethos, we are once again
put to face the very problem for which the country had
agreed to divide iitself in two independent political
units. Article 30 of the Coonstitution is cletermental
to the accepted theory of Hindus and Muslims being two
different nations. While we conceded this point at the
time of partition, we appear to have lost recognizing it
for later times. Similarly, while we integrated the
princely states into the union of India, we accorded a
special and temporary stautus of almost another free
country to the state of J & K. This refers to Article
370. We can now see this having its own affect in that
our own pampered local leaders of the National
Conference are asking for greater autonomy for J&K.
Should this be conceded, what argument shall be left
with us to have denied the same status to the states of
Travecore and Cochin, Hyderabad, Bhopal and other large
princely states that were merged into India without any
pre condition?

Fragmentation of Hindu sentiment:

From the angle of political India, even

small groups of Hindus could not be united and brought
on one platform to protect their own long time
interests. Groups like Arya Samaj, Hindu Maha Sabha, RSS
and Sanatan Sabhawere all put under greaf pressures to
supress the rising agitation of the Hindus for the
reason that everyone expected things to radically change
in favour of the Hindus when the country became free in
1947. Within the Congress party, there continued to
reamin a strong lobby Of Muslims led by India's first
Minister of education Maulana Azad. He was born in
Arabia and was educated on Muslim pattern in Cario and
was a man of totally Muslim make up. In order to prove
the bonafide of Congress party as the secular party in
India, both Gandhi and Nehru are on record for having
always belittled the Hindu interests yet failing to take
into account the effects of such attitude in the long
run. What we watched as resurfacing problem of Muslims
in India is also based on this reason. One amy read
Maulana's book (India wins freedom) where he without
ambiguity states that he himself opposed the partition
of the country on the ground that such a conduct will
hit the real interests of the Muslims who as known are
religiously ordained to bring about a world of Darul
lslam. He was ably assisted in this game by his son-in-
law Mr.Hamayun Kabir who also was picked up and
appointed as the first secretary to the Ministry of
Education. Nehru missed the focal point that a
department of education is an ideal forum to prepare the
future of the Nation. For such purpose, a man of
standing was Dr.Shayama Prasad Mukerjee. He was a
staunch Hindu and was ideally suited for the job.
However, only to appease the Muslims, Nehru and Gandhi
once again committed a great blunder. We in India are
paying for such political blunders even today. Dr,
S.P.Mukerjees ability as a political visionary may be
seen from the records of debates in the assembly of
Bengal before India was partitioned.

Sardar Patel was one Congress leader who

could be said to have possessed a long distance vision.
After being disgusted with the policies followed by
Gandhi and Nehru, he is on record having said that he
knew "One national Muslim by the name of Jawaharlal
Nehru". He died in the year 1950 when Indian
Constitution was formally adopted by the first
Parliament of India. He along with Dr.Rajendra Prasad
resolved the problem of Som Nath Temple in Gujarat once
for all but the other problem of Ram Mandir at Ayodhya,
on account of his early death continues to haunt the
entire country even today. Had he lived longer, perhaps
he could have influenced country's economic and
political policies better suited to Hindus. Maulana
Azaad at the time when the country adopted Hindi as
country's official language felt belittled and always
worked to ensure that Urdu in Arabic script was accorded
by the state of India, an equal status with Hindi. He
succeeded in it, although not one Muslim can ever claim
having contributed to the drawing up of Urdu Script,
borrowed from the Arabic, a foreign language indeed.
Hindu scholars in Urdu are as many as the Muslims. It is
a Turkish word meaning Soldier & had its start during
the reign of Akbar.
Political situation :
In the year 1952 at the time of first election, the
Muslim parties particularly in Kerela began making
bargains in seat adjustment for winning the elections.
The very Muslim party that was responsible for the
partition of the country once again resurfaced in Kerela
and continued to call itself as Muslim league. Nehru's
own Congress party shook hands with the Muslim league in
Kerela that gave a fresh momentum once again to the
Muslims reemergence at that time which was so close to
the year 1947. In this game, even the communist party of
India played their own role to participate in elections
and brought about a Government in the form of coalition
that contained the Muslim league. This itself encouraged
the Muslims left in India to reunite themselves and to
continue with their old game of expanding Darul Islam
wherever on the globe Darul Herb existed. This game in
Kerela continues to date and the Muslims voters have
realized their new strength of vote in a democracy.
Hindus on the other hand have faced. Secularism in India
which too cannot be fully prescribed unless Islamic
followers agree to alter destructive Ayats contained in
their holy book of Quaran.

Jan Sangh and Janta party :

Congress policy of pampering the Muslims to

woo for their votes led to the formation of Jan Sangh by
its leader Dr. Shayama Prasad Mukerjee. It was a
Nationalist party with Hindutva as its base. It soon
began making its impact. Between 1967 and 1975, Jan
sangh did emerge as a Nationalist party of the Hindus.
However, it stood accepted to begin with only in the
North and among the higher castes of Hindus. In 1968,
its President Mr.Din Dayal Upadhaya was killed in
mysterious circumstances. The coming up of Jan Sangh was
affected. It was also affected for some of its internal
politics when Professor Balraj Madhok its earlier
President was dismembered as the member of Jan Sangh.
The cumulative effect looked to pamper the Muslim
community in India who did not want to face the ideas of
Professor Balraj Madhok, admittedly had past record of
strong Hinduism & passion for being a true patriot. His
own political comrades stopped him in his political
pursuit. Strangely even at his age of 84, he displays
courage & alertness of mind that can help the cause
India, even today.

The politics in India in the year 1975, when

Indira Gandhi declared National Emergency took another
shape of giving birth to Janta Party whose first Prime
Minister was Morarji Desai. This party too suffered for
its internal conflicts between Chou d ary Charan Singh
and Morarji Desai. The party had principally been voted
to power by the people rejecting conduct of Emergency
brought about by Indira Gandhi and her son Sanjay
Gandhi. He was a young man with some of his own ideas
but he was still a political novice. In the year 1977,
Janta party was formed with iits victory over the
Congress party led by Mrs. Indira Gandhi. Muslim
community in particular worked at this time against the
policies of Sanjay Gandhi although even vviithout their
support, Janta Party could have won the elections all
over India. Muslims and their supporters somehow
overrated the reasons of Janta Party's victory.
Religious leaders of the Muslims like Imam of Jam,
Masjid in New Delhi took the credit of over throwing the
Government of Indira Gandhi. Amongst other names who
Constituted the Janta Party were Atal Bihari Vajpayee,
Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna and George Fernandez. The party
in the beginning promised to do away with the miniority
commission. The Muslim participants in Janta Party
succeeded in defeating this election promise of'Janta
Party. Wiithin 3 years of its winning the elections as a
new Party into which had gone Hindu Jan Sangh, soon
split and what came out of it was not the original Jan
Sangh but a new party said to be of Hindus in the name
of the BJP. This break up once again suited the Muslims
who never desired India to politcically uniite and
emerge as a strong political nation owing its roots in
India's ancientism.

Indira Gandhi was relected in the year 1980.

At this point of time, country went through witnessing
the demand of Khalistan in Punjab. Muslims and Sikhs
united in this game and were supported from outside
Pakistan. While Indira Gandhi began reassessing the
political situation in India clearly understanding the
impact of Muslim thought in India, she was herself
assassinated by her own Sikh security guards, Her son
Sanjay Gandhi had died earlier in an Air crash.

Raiiv Gandhi becomes Prime Minister

on his mother's funeral pyre :

Radio and television in India have been

under the state control. They played up the
assassination of Indira Gandhi repeatedly on TV channels
that worked as a great medium of publicity to bring
Rajiv Gandhi in the seat of India's Prime Ministership.
Hindus supported him handsomely. They had been
disillusioned by the untimely liquidation of Janta party
that almost broke up with open fights between Choudary
Charan singh and Morarji Desai. At about this time, the
Supreme Court gave a verdict in the case of Shah Bano
and her husband. The verdiict ran against the dictations
of Prophet Mond. contained in the chapter of Shariat in
the holy book of Quaran. The Supreme Court directed the
Government to give effect to Article 44 of the
Constitution of India so that Muslim women on being
divorced by their husbands did not suffer as human
beings. The Muslim community or their religious leaders
considered this judgement of the Supreme Court as an
attack on their personnel rights. Many delegations were
led against this to Rajiv Gandhi who in order to once
again woo the votes of the Muslims, succumbed to their
pressures and negatived the affect of this judgement of
India's highest court by bringing about a Muslim
favoured legislation on the strength of his majority in
the Parliament of India. Once again the Apex court has
given its views this time to the NDA Govt, in the year
2003, that the country does need a common civil code for
all its citizens. One of the reasons that is responsible
for the spread of Islam in the world is its assured male
domination over the females, Rajiv Gandhi as the Prime
Minister yielded to the Muslim pressure by abandoning
considering its long term affects in India. The Muslims
once agin succeeded in a Darul Herb to ensure that they
were ruled by their own declared Islmic laws rather han
submit to the common law of land controlled by the
Government in the territory of Darul Herb.

The Muslims were thus in a position to understand that

in a period of about 35 years, they have reached a stage
not to interfere in their private religious laws
notwithstanding that the Indian Constitution itself
contains a directory provision by which state is
expected to bring about one common civil code of law for
everyone in the country. The Muslim problem therefore
became more aggressive than what it was in the year1947.

External factors

I was born at Lahore now in Pakistan. I came

to Delhi with my parents, brother and sister on 14th
August, 1947. At the time of leaving Lahore, our
neighbour one Mr.Ghulam Mohd Butt came to see us off
knowing that my fahter who was a Railway officer in the
North Westrn Railway had offered to migrate to India. I
remember his young son almost of my age at that time
said "Hans Ke Liya Hai Pakistan, Ladh Ke Leinge
Hindustan." This had become a common Muslim slogan of
their victory for having won Pakistan. The creation of
Pakistan was itself a sufficient sore point for India to
live even as their neighbour. Pakistan's further
fragmentation into Bangladesh in fact adds further sore
to India. With the population indexes of Hindus and
Muslism in the 3 countries, one cannot fail to notice
the growing population of Muslims around and inside
India. We are presently facing this problem in the
Indian state of J & K. Muslims in India can be expected
to act to further divide India when the proper time has
ripened for that purpose. Hence, policy of Pakistan and
Bangladesh cannot be any different towards India. Should
the Indian leadership fail once again as before, it is
practically prewritten on the wall that in the coming
100 years, there shall be no secular India left but in
its place we shall have the whole of India converted
into Darul Islan7. It is a word of caution given by me
as a warning based upon analysis of the problem breifly
carried out in this publication to call upon Hindus in
particular and other minority communities living in
India to wake up or else what holds for them in the
pregnant future is to lose totally one's entity by
giving up all that we have had by way of cherished
values in our social, cutlural and economic systems.

Politically, we are being pushed towards

something inevitable for the reason of Hindu leadership
persisting as always in contnuing with one political
blunder after another. Pakistan and Bangladesh both
Islamic Republics on the West and East of India have
become a matter of serious concern. The separatist idea
of the Muslim, world to convert the entire world into
Darul lslam has not undergone any change in the last
1400 years. We are a big nation with all sorts of
resources and manpower blessed with all needed human
qualities. Hindus must shed their fears and boldly act
to revive the original idea of the Jan Sangh now that we
have experienced and seen the total failure of the NDA
Government led by the BJP. Its leadership has proven
totally inadequate for the challenges before the Indian
nation where almost 80% people belong to Hindu faith.
This Government of BJP has not even succeeded in solving
RAM MANDIR ISSUE. In fact Seven out of Eight top ranking
Hindu leaders shall face a criminal trial in a
supposedly Hindu country.

In addition to the geographical sandwich of

India between Pakistan and Bangladesh, we continue to be
black mailed by the Islamic nations of the Middle East.
They put up the cost of oil for which we in India are
desperate. In the year 1970, a barrel of oil drilled in
Kuwait was bought by India at the price of 0.70 US
Dollars. The present price of the same barrel of oil is
over -50 US Dollars. This is causing to us a great
headache since the country has to survive by importing
huge qualities of oil from the Middle Eastern countries
of Islam. This is a very serious problem not only for
the people of India but it is in fact a problem for the
entire world. Indian leadership has to look into this
weakness of the country to discover alternative means of
generating power at the cost which we can afford.

India has also been put to challenge in its

foreign policy. None can forget the Pakistani Terrorists
hijacking Indian Airlines plane from Kathmandu and
taking it to Kabul. For a country as big as India, the
foreign Minister of India had go to Kabul with release
of captured convict/terrorists in order to have the
passengers in the plane released. A recent news has
instantly connected Pakistan's hand in such
Terrorism.The very Government in Afghanistan had openly
defied the entire world by destroying large Buddhist
rock carvings of 2000 years antiques in Bamiyan. They
did so in the 21 th century on the belief of their right
held by them as stated in the holy book of Muslims
called Quaran. The same book unhesitatingly declares the
faithful Muslims to fight or wage not one but as many as
may be needed, Jehads in order to kill the infields Le,
the idol worshippers anywhere on the globe. Oh, Hindus,
forget not that you are definitely believers and
worshippers of your Gods accepted by you as per your own
Dharam Shastras. You are thus carrying out a conduct of
Kufr and each one of you who believe in your 33 crores
Devi/Devtas are meant to be killed under the sword of
Islam that is divenly ordained for the Muslims never to
feel shy of acting with utmost cruelty towards you. This
is what has been unmistakably brought out in this book.
Whereas, you are carrying the message of your ancestors
i.e. 1. SARVA DHARMA SAM13HAVA and 2. VASUDEVAM
KU1TUMBAM, you are to be punished for holding such views
that do not find acceptance in the message of Allha
contained in the Quaran and said by his Prophet Mohd.
For your non belief in Islam, you are destined to be the
companions of fire in the hell of Allha, forget your
pursuit for seeking Moksha for it has no room in the
message of Allha that gave to Mohd. his Prophet his
directions to physically and cruelly destroy you and
your faith wherever the faithful may find you.

There are 40 Islamic states around India.

They act as a united family of Islam. It matters not
that we in India have the second largest Muslim
population in our own counrty. It matters not that our
Constitution guarantees equal rights to all those born
in India. It matters not that the Constitution provides
special protection to the minorties into which are
contained almost 16 crores Muslims. It matters not that
our Constitution further provides special protection to
the minorities to spread their religious doctrines and
to manage their educational institutions as they may
like and to protect their minoritism. It matters not
that the very Constitution does not contain any special
privilege or protection to the Hindus. It matters not
that notwithstanding any bar on account of religion,
anyone born in India regardless of his faith can rise to
occupy the highest post in the State of India.1t matters
not that we have practiced successful democracy in the
last 50 years and 3 of our Presidents have been those
who were the believers in Islam, yet the Hindus are now
put to challenge which is now as clear as the crystal
for the whole world to see.

REMEMBER, THE TASK OF MOHD. BEGUN 1400 YEARS

AGO, IS NOT ENDED AND IT LIES IN WAIT TO SEE THAT THE
WORLD IS CONVERTED INTO DARUL ISLAM FROM DARUL HERB OR
ELSE ALLAHA THE ALMIGHTY WHO IS SAID TO BE REHMANE RAHIM
DOES NOT PROMISE TO YOU, A LIFE OF PEACE ON EARTH.

CHAPTER-XI
ISLAMIC PLAN OF INDIA'S CONQUEST
 The Muslim problem of India should have
ended with India's division in two independent states in
the year 1947. On the contrary, on analysis, it can be
concluded that the problem not only remains unsolved but
has become all the more worse than before for the Hindus
in India. Unfortunately, even to date, the Hindus remain
utterly indifferent to study the underlying genuine
ethos of the Muslims. Hindus have not sufficiently
educated themselves in the Islamic history. They also
remain totally indifferent to the political
ramifications of the continuing Terrorism supported by
the Muslims particularly in Pakistan who also have their
connections undisturbed within India. Even today, the
Hindu politically interested organizations remain
ununited that suits the real purpose of the Muslims.
They remain as loyal as ever to the dogma of Islam. The
party that was born close to the year 1950 under the
name of Jan Sangh has gone into oblivion and unless the
same is revived based upon the same old analogy, India
does run a great risk of being taken over by Islamic
theology in the next 100years. All Hindus organizations
have to come on one common platform of Hinduism without
which the concept of India as a Nation is unthinkable.

In the pre partition days, Muslims

constituted about 20% of the total population. At that
time, the Muslims had the support in a sly, manner of
the British rulers. Today, the Muslims in India can
expect to be supported by almost 40 Islamic nations with
Pakistan,
Bangladesh and the 5th Columnists living in India to
support the cause of converting India into Darul lslam.

There are some very important Muslim

religious parties in India that are led by important
clerics of the Muslims. 'Jamaiyte Islami'and 'Jamaiyte
Ulma - e - Hind' are two such organizations that have
already establsihed their importance not only amongst
the Muslims in India but they have even connections with
the important Muslims leaders who have penetrated into
other political or secular parties of India.SIMI is
another such organization.

Quaran divides the entire world population

only in two parties. The first party as called Hajbe
Allaha (party of Allaha) and the second party is called
as Hajbul Shaitan. Some Muslim scholars provide an
illustration of Muslim joining the Jews to set up a
common political control when Mohd. in his early days
was at Medina. They established a joint political
command over this area, any combination of such nature
runs contrary to the dictations of Islam in Quaran.
Maulana Maudoodi in one of his published utterances
stated that such a common political control was nothing
beyond a temporary military alliance carried out for the
purpose of final establishment of Muslim control in and
around Mecca and Medina. This combination did not last
more than 3 years until Mohd himself took over Mecca
itself. Once again another Muslim cleric talking of
India and the Muslims in it stated as the President of
Jamaiyte Ulmae-Hind "If the Muslims in Pakistan when it
comes to rule that land in accordance with the
directions of the holy Quaran, not only I alone but the
Muslims all over the world bless this idea and the
scheme or concept as something highly auspicious". This
thus is the unaltered belief of the world's MUSALMANS.

Both the above parties have been

persistently saying that Islam does not consider or
recognize any sort of Nationalism that is ordained by
Allah. This applies to India and let the Indians be made
aware of that. It is impossible'or absurd to think ever
a Muslim placing his faith in any sort of secularism.
The politics and the religion in Islam are unseparable.
The ultimate aim of Islam is to cause total political
domination of the entire world by the people owing
allegiance only to Mohd and Quaran. This is unamendable
now or ever hereafter. A non-believer is to be made the
companion of fire to whom Allaha himself has ordained to
be so punished. This is thus a clear REALITY

Maulana Hussain Ahmed Madni of the Jamaiyte

Ulam-e-Hind once again reassrts his faith in Islam
saying "it is the most important for the Muslims in
India to firmly establish the Muslim political control
over India, Every Muslim must make this as his singular
aim notwithstanding that Muslims may have to lay their
lives and to wait for the final outcome for some more
time. Allaha has already blessed the Muslims all over
the world to carry out this scared task without fear and
by their such attitude, fear and panic will be created
amongstthe opponents of Islam. The generations of
Muslims to follow are given this divine promise to enjoy
the world as the gift of Allaha and if in his cause, a
Muslim dies while attempting to behead the Kafirs, he
will be received in SHASISHT' where Allaha promises to
serve him with his divine, gifts for the service he has
rendered to the cause of Islam".

Once again Jamaiyte Ulam-e-Hind published

their views in 1950 in the following words "From the day
Islamic rule of the Moghuls ended in India, it has
become and is to be considered as Darul Herd'. Repeating
the same views, he further said in the years 1971, 1977
and 1979 that every memeber of Jamaiyte Ulam-e-Hind must
work to bring about imposition of Muslim Islamic control
of India. Muslims newspapers 'Tanjim'wrote in the name
of Doctor Kichu "Muslims should expect no cooperation
from the Hindus as they will always resist reimposition
of Muslim rule in India".
 Doctor Mushir - Ul - Haq writing in a Muslim
newspaper of Delhi said "But for a very small portion of
land in India, Muslims are a Minority. Hence, a new
political stance should be adopted to bear Islamic
fruits in future". "No Muslim can isolate himself with
his no belief in secularism and permit any non-Islamic
domination over the Muslims. For the Muslims, Politics
and religion cannot be separated.We have gone into
accepting secularism in India after the departure of the
British under the compulsion of circumstances. Muslims
have never regarded secularism as a substitute in place
of Islamic political domination. Most Ulmhas in India
support the above view as a period of transition".

Muslims have brought out a 3 point programme to be

followed till their efforts to convert India into Darul
Islam finally matures. They are :

1 . Entry of Muslims in the politics of India and

penetrating into Indian political parties that advocate
secularism.

2. Spread of Terrorism to demoralize Indian

defence forces and to combat the Indian police force as
and when necessary.(This is becoming too obvious).

3. Non cooperation with Government's announced

policy of family planning.

No further proofs are warranted to conclude

that most criminals of all sorts who face criminal
prosecution are Muslims. Such actions that have the
tendency to unite Muslims as a Kaum=Nation are to be
encouraged by all Muslims living in India. All Muslims
should endeavour to convert as many Hindus to their
faith as can be done through inducements including
marrying young Hindu women to the Muslim males.

While the world may note that Yoguslovia

has18% population and Bulgaria has 12% Muslim
population, the former has already entered into
political and social turmoil for the reason of Islamic
theology. The Muslims desire to copy such like conducts
of Muslims even in India. Hindus are now being pushed
out of Bangladesh and lacs of such like persons are
being made to settle on the Inclo-Bangladesh borders.
From there in a system,ic design they are pushed out
with ISI aid to the bigger cities in India. Hence, even
Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and areas in the state of Assam
in India are being continuously attacked by the Muslims
supported by Pakistan. In this adventure, Students
Islamic Movement (SIMI) has been specially found very
active in the recent past. This organization has been
banned by the Central Government. This organization
supported by petro dollars from the Middle East and
through the supply of weapons from Pakistan is already
involved in creating communal riots in the cities of
India. The recent Gujarat incident of riots owe its
cause of burning alive the returning Ram Sevaks from
Ayodhaya at Godhra to this organization that has had the
support of Pakistan always. The Bombay bomb blasts of
28th August 2003 also find their roots in the SIMI.

Mr. Shahbudin now in Bihar is an ex-IAS

Officer. He is on record having said that the Muslims in
order to protect themselves in India must not forgert
their role that will bear fruits in the time away only
if the present Muslims in India realize that their
actions to support Islam have to be based on the present
realities of Indian and world politics.

In conclusion therefore, one need not any

more doubt the real intention aim of Muslims in India
who by their own divine ordainments cannot be ever, the
followers of secularism that is no substitute for their
final aim of attainment of converting India into Dalul
lslam which according to them at present is Darul Herb.

CHAPTER-XII
TIME FOR DECISION will R.S.S leadership listen?
(by Prof. Balrai Madhok)

I have recently come across a copy of Prof.

Balraj Ma.hdok's one article written in the year 1988.
It is pertinent to reproduce the same because it reveals
a great deal that went within the Indian politics of the
period of those days. A pertinent question of the main
philosophy of the then Jan Sangh and how it was
influenced to take certain political stands that had
direct bearings on the question of the Muslim problem in
India needs to be included in this book. I have
therefore, reproduced almost the entire article
published under the title 'Time for Decision'. Another
letter written by him to the then Home Minister of
India, Shri Buta Singh is also reproduced for the
benefit of the readers.

"Time factor and human factor play very

important role in all human affairs, particularly in the
political field. A mistake committed by leadership on
the spur of moment often penalises a nation for
centurties. (LAMHON NE KHATA KI, SADIYON NE SAZZA PAI.)
For the errors of moments, centuries stood punished.

A mistake committed by R.S.S. Jan Sangh

leadership in 1967, has been bedeviling not only these
two organizations but has also imperilled the future of
Hindustan and the Hindus. The mistake and its aftermath
need to be recounted for the benefit of all Nationalists
in India.
 Prof. Balraj Madhok took over the
Presidentship of Bhartiya 1 Jan Sangh in early 1966 when
Shri Din Dayal Upadhyaya pleaded that Jan Sangh needed a
President who had an all India image and who could also
communicate with the people effectively in both Hindi
and English. But he was dismayed when he was told that
Upadhyaya would not be available to him as the General -
Secretary because his services were needed by R.S.S.
Guruji Shri Golvalkar.

Jan Sangh had at that time not come of age.

Formation of Swatantra party had narrowed its scope.
Crushing defeat of Shri Din Dayal Upadhyaya in the bye-
election of Lok Sabha from Jaunpur constituency, that
had fallen vacant due to death of a Jan Sangh member,
caused great sorrow within the party. While Masani,
Acharya Kriplani and Ram Manohar Lohia all won their
bye-elections from the Congress held seats, Jan Sangh
workers saw little chance of Balraj Madhok win a
Parliamentary seat from New Delhi. He goes on to state
further as under:

"But I had my own assessment of the stuation

and vision of the future. Agreement about the adjustment
of seats with Swatant.ra Party and close liaison with
Arya Samaj brought about a sea change in the atmosphere.
My battle cry 'Congress is going, Jan Sangh is coming'
also had an electrifying effect. The results vindicated
my optimism, Jan Sangh won 35 and Swantantra Party won
45 seats in then Lok Sabha. About twenty independents
were also elected with our support. Thus the fourth Lok
Sabha came to have a Hindu minded Nationalist and
rightist block of 100 members. Communist party and
P.S.P. which held second and third places in Lok Sabha.
The Congress was relegated to the fourth place .
Congress majority was reduced to just twenty members.

In the State Assemblies, Jan Sangh emerged

as the main opposition party in Jammu and Kashmir,
Himachal Pradesh, Punajb, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya
PPradesh and Bihar. In Rajasthan Swatantra Party had an
edge over Jan Sangh and both of them had a narrow edge
over the Congress Party. In the National metropolis,
Delhi, Jan Sangh won six out of the seven seats in Lok
Sabha and a clear majority in Delhi Metropolitan
Council. In terms of votes polled, it emerged as the
second party after the Congress on the National plane.

Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia, the Socialists

leader, then gave a call to all the opposition parties
to come together to oust Congress from power on the
basis of anti-Congressism. There were some power hungry
Congress legislators in all states who were prepared to
defeat and give United Legislature Parties. "Sanyukta
Vidhayak Dals" (SVD) of the opposition parties, a clear
edge over the Congress Assembly parties in all the
states. Some power hungry leaders of Jan Sangh also fell
in line with Dr.Lohia

I was not in favour of this opportunists

short cut to power on the negative basis. I was
particularly opposed to joint fronts with Communists and
Communalists which was my commitment to-the voters. But
I found myself in minority in my own working committee,
I, therefore, decided to resign rather than be a party
to a move which I considered to be wrong on principle
and doomed to failure. I clearly foresaw the fall of the
S.V. D. Governments in a short time which would give new
credibility and lease of life to the Congress party. My
intention to resign created a flutter in the R.S.S. and
Jan Sangh ranks. Shri Bala Saheb Deoras who was then the
General Secretary of R.S.S., came to my residence and
pressed me to stay on. I accepted his request but gave
him my frank assessment about the future of S.V.D.
governments and the effect of their failure on the
future of Jan Sangh. This one mistake that Jan Sangh
committed in 1967, marked the beginning of its decline.

My worst fears proved correct. S.V. D.

governments began to fall like house of cards wtihin a
year. Their fall out cost Jan Sangh dear. One fall out
of those ill fated S.V.D. governments was the mysterious
murder of Din Dayal Upadhyaya, who had taken over
presidency of Jan Sangh from me, only six weeks back, in
U.P. on Feb, 10, 1968. This murder and some findings of
C.B.I. about it gave Indira Gandhi a handle to blackmail
some top leaders of Jan Sangh with disastrous results
for the future of Jan Sangh and democracy in India.

The other by product was the birth of Kranti

Dal which was later renamed as Lok Dal by its founder
leader Ch. Charan Singh. Leaders of U.P. Jan Sangh had
brought Charan Singh out of the Congress to make him the
Chief Minister of the S.V.D. Government of which Jan
Sangh was the main stay.

Inspite of the failure of the S.V.D.

governments and return of Congress to power in the Hindi
belt, its position continued to be precarious in Lok
Sabha. The split in Congress Parliamentary party in 1969
reduced the ruling Congress party to a minority. The
fear of being voted out of power by the combined
opposition resulted in the dissolution of the fourth Lok
Sabha towards the end of 1970 and fresh elections in
early 1971.

There were no three like minded parties

which were being escribed as reactionary, rightist-and
"Patelites" by the Nehruite Congress, Socialist and
Communist parties. They were Jan Sangh, Swatantra Party
and Congress (O). A plan was made to forge an alliance
of these three parties. They were to have a common
election manifesto and were to sit as one block in Lok
Sabha after the elections.

But some Nehruite infiltrators in Jan Sangh

and Congress (O) spilled the beans by insisting upion
inclusion of Socialists in the proposed alliance to
prevent its being dubbed as rightist and reactionary by
Indira Gandhi. Socialists decided to come in it on the
condition that the alliance will have no common
manifesto and there will be no prior committmment to sit
as one block in the new Lok Sabha, As a result, the
national alliance was reduced to just electoral front
aimed at adjustment of seats to prevent multicorner
contests.

In actual practice, even the adjustment of

seats could not be affected all over the country. As
such the name "grand alliance" given to it was a
misnomer. It was neither, grand nor alliance but just an
adjustment of seats which too was not carried out
faithfully.

The instinct of survival of different

political leaders coupled with the pressure of the
people who had been totally alienated by the Emergency
excesses forced the political parties to merge and form
Janta Party. But there were doubts about the survival of
Janta Party even before it was formally launched. I well
remember how Prof.Samar Guha, the Socialist leader, who
was my co-detenue,, in a jail reacted to the first news
about the formation of Janta Party when it reached us in
Rohtak jail in December, 1976. Will this unity last,
yours is a rightist party and we are the leftists? How
shall we pull together, he asked. And then, without
waiting for my reply added "There is no other way to get
out of jail and get rid of Emergency! Let us hope that
unity will last. But if it does not, we can again
separate".

Jan Sangh was the best organized constituent

of Janta Party. R.S.S. which had been declared illegal
and thousands of whose workers were rotting in jails was
determined to oust Indira Gandhi. Its close links with
Jan Sangh were well known. Jan Sangh leaders, therefore,
could speak from a position of strength. They were able
to persuade Ch. Charan Singh to give desired number of
tickets to Jan Sangh nominees and deny it to some other
including nyself. In return Ch, Charan Singh was assured
that he would be made the Prime Minister.

Just as the S.V.D of 1967 was formed on the

basis of antiCongressism, Janta Party too was formed on
the basis of antiIndiraism. Had Janta leaders been able
to provide it a positive ideological basis, it could
have survived the conspiracies of Socialists and
Inidra's agents within it. There was much in common
between Jan Sangh, Lok Dal and Congress (0) which
together had about 240 members in Lok Sabha. All these
parties were considered to be rightists. They were
closer to Sardar Patel than Pt. Nehru in their thinking.
Both Morarji Desai and Charan Singh had a clean image.
Both were Nationalists and proud of being Hindus. But
they were allergic to each other. Morarji considered
Charan Singh to be only a tribal and a caste leader and
not a national leader. Jan Sangh leadership could have
acted as a bridge between them and made Janta government
a really Nationalist Government capable of giving a new
direction to the National politics and the National
policies.

But Jan Sangh failed to rise to the occasion

A.B.Vajpayee and Nana Deshmukh were pulling in different
directions. R.S.S. leadership could not give any
positive guidance to Jan Sangh group because of its lack
of thought orientation. It was concerned only with the
control of Jan Sangh group and through it, the Janta
Party.

That is why Jan Sangh, which was in a

commanding position in Janta Parliament Party did not
press even for implementation of Article 44 of the
Comstitution pertaining to uniform laws for all citizens
and abrogation of Article 370. Nor did it oppose the
formation of Minorties Commision, which had become the
most potent factor for further disintegration of
truncated India. I treid my best to persuade members of
these three parties to form a common ideological block
within the Janta Party. I also suggested the formation
of a "Patel Forum ", Some of the Lok Dal and Congress
(0) members were agreeable but Jan Sangh members paid no
heed. Since I was not a member of the Parliament, I
could only sugest from outside.

It is wrong to blame only Ch. Charan Singh

and Raj Narain for the break up of Janta Party. The role
of Socialist members was a destructive one. But the real
guilty men were those who instead of acting as a bridge
between Morarji Desai and Charan Singh tried to play the
role of proverbial monkey in the fight between two cats.
As a result, the cats and the monkey suffered alike. The
only lasting tie, the real binding force, in politics is
the community of thought, of ideology. Organization and
power also bind but only temporarily. Janta Party had
drawn up a common programme. But it had no common
ideology, no common basic* thought and no common vision
about the future of Hindustan. No astrologer was,
therefore, required to predict its disintegration and
fall. I had given two years life to Janta government in
a press conference at Chandigarh in July, 1977. It
lasted a couple of months more.
 The failure of Janta Party was basically a
failure of Jan Sangh and R.S.S. Had R.S.S.and Jan Sangh
leadership been thought oriented, it could have
efectively influenced Janta Party and Janta government
in the making of politics even without securing physical
control over it. But they failed miserably. They failed
even to put any of their people on any key posts outside
the government which does play a role in influencing the
National policies, For instance, R.S.S. Jan Sangh could
not get even a single person with Hindu orientation
appointed as a Governor or an ambassador. In fact even
when names of some top Jan Sangh people like Barrister
U. M. Tridevi, who had spent nineteen months in jail as
MISA detenue, were suggested by Morarji Desasi for some
key posts, they were vetoed by Jan Sangh nominees in the
Government because of petty personal prejudices.

Lack of thought orientation of, Jan Sangh

and R.S.S. became even clearer after the disintegration
of Janta Party. Instead of re-emerging as Jan Sangh with
its saffron flag and clear cut ideology and policies,
they floated a new party under the name of Bhartiya
Janta Party. It adopted the flag, ideology and slogans
of Janta Party including "Gandhian Socialism" and
accepted Gandhi and J.P. as its new sources of
inspiration in place of Dr. Hedgewar and Dr. Mookerji.
The reply of a top R.S.S. man who had become the Vice
President of B.J.P. to my question about the rational of
dropping Jan Sangh ideology? Their following is
comparable to clientalle of two equally qualified
physicians in a locality. It is a question of prefernce
and not of ideology.

This approach in regard to thought and

ideology lies at the root of the present confusion in
R.S.S. and the drift in the B.J.R This explains the
statements of R.S.S. leaders that their workers are free
to join any party. How can a person committed to any
ideals and ideology become a member of a party the
ideals and ideology of which happen to be quite
different? Those who say such things are either ignorant
about the ideals and ideology of the founding fathers of
R.S.S. or they have drifted away from them? They are
treating R.S.S. workers as automatons who have no will
and mind of their own? But they are mistaken. The rank
and file of R.S.S. as also the workers of B.J.P.drawn
from R.S.S. have begun to question the wisdom of such
leaders and their orders. That explains why R.S.S.
workers worked and voted for Shiv Sena in preference to
B.J.R at Aurangabad in the recent elections held there.

My purpose in narrating the events since

1967, is to refresh the memory of well wishers of Hindu
cause. The train of mistakes and error that followed the
initial mistake of 1967, has greatly harmed the Hindu
cause and delayed the emergence of a Hindu alternative
to the Congress by twenty years. Jan Sangh is accepted
today even by its worst critics, would have emerged from
principled approach and not followed the path of
oppurtunism in 1967.

Indian politics has again entered a crucial

period. Congress is in shambles. The socialists and left
oriented ex-Congress men and their parties have grouped
themselves in Samajwadi Janta Dal (SJD). S.J. D. has
joined hands with like minded regional parties to form a
National Front to provide to Congress an alternative to
the Congress party. A look at the 71 point programme of
the Front makes it clear that it is going to be an alter
ego of the Congress. It will be more pro-Muslim than the
Congress so that it may attract the Muslim votes. That
is why there is not only no mention of a common civil
code for all citizens in it but, what is worse, it has
committed itself to give a statutory status to
"Minorities Commission" instead of scrapping it or
replacing it with a "Human Rights Commission".

Communist parties know that they can not

come to power on their own. So they are going to follow
the well-known Communist strategy of United Fronts. They
are keeping their options open to align themselves with
the Congress or the National Front at the opportune
time. Since both Congress and National Front have the
same political culture and same basic policies of
Socialism, Secularism and non-Alignment as conceived by
Pt. Nehru, the common sense can choose any of them
without any qualms of conscience.

Hindus are being taken for granted by all

these three, the Congress, the National Front and the
Communists. AIl of them are interested in maximum
fragmentation of Hindu society. All of them fear Indian
Nationalism which is rooted in Hinduism. All of them
want to woo Muslims and other minority groups. That is
why they want to keep all parties with any kind of Hindu
orientation at an arms length.

The leadership of B.J.P is keen to get an

entry into the National Front. But Front parties do not
want to take the risk of allianating Muslim voters
because of R.S.S. connection of the B.J.P. So they want
to keep it out of the Front but may offer it adjustment
of seats. But in view of the experience of recent by-
elections, rank and file of B.J.P. is not in favour of
it. Even such B.J.P. leaders who are keen to get some
crumbs, may find it difficult to settle at the number of
seats that the Front may offer to them.

This developing situation has bewildered the

rank and file of B.J.P. drawn from the R.S.S. as also
many R.S.S. workers, They are becoming nostalgic about
Jan Sangh and want a Hindu oriented, liberal alternative
like Jan Sangh to both Congress and National Front to
emerge through unification of all ex-Jan Sabghis and
other Hindu oriented organisations. Most conscious
Hindus want such an alternative to be created at the
earliest. Circumstances are proptitious for it. The
appeal of ideology of Hindu Rashtra and Hindu state,
welfare economy, Nationalist foreign policy and
realistic approach to problems of Pubjab, Kashmir and
Sri Lanka is steadily growing all over the country.
There are favourable rumblings within 8.J.P. to its
President. L.K.A.dvani, in 1, which he has pleaded for
taking a distinct Hindu stance instead of running after
National Front. 1 too talked to Advani on the same
lines.

Such a Hindu alternative can grow fast and

gain power on it., own to give Nationalist Hindu
orientation to policies and politics of Hindustan. 1 am
confident that it can get 50 to 100 seats in Lok Sabha
in 1989 and come to power on its own in 1994, provided
it has credible leadership and effective organisational
infrastructure.

Jan Sangh had built an effective

infrastructure. It also had a distinct ideology and,
credible leadership with clean and Hindu image. But now
that infrastructure is with Bhartiya Janta Party and
ideology and leadership with Bhartiya Jan Sangh rump.
Some new organisations with similar ideology like Shiv
Sena and Hindu Munani have also emerged in some parts of
the country. They need to be brought together. The
leadership, the ideology and the infrastructure must get
together. This is the need of the hour.

The main hurdle in the way of emergence of

such a Hindu alternative is the R.S.S. leadership, which
holds the key to B.J.P. The rank and file of R.S.S. want
its leadership to rise to the occasion. But in view of
the monolithic structure of the R.S.S. the feelings and
urges of its common workers do not carry much weight.
Only Sar Sangh Chalak counts.

But this situation can not continue for

long. Even some R. S. S. activists have begun to speak
out.

The R.S.S. leadership will have to pay heed

to the feelings and urges of its rank and file. R.S.S.
can still play a decisive and positive role positive
role provided its leadership takes steps as under:

(1) Makes it thought oriented instead of control

oriented.
(2) Gives up its hegemonious approach. It must
learn to work together with like mined people in the
service of the common cause.

(3) Makes effective use of its levers in the

B.J.P. to give it a Hindu orientation so that it may
become the nucleus of the Hindu alternative. If B.J.P.
leadership refuses to listen, R.S.S. should direct
organisation and individuals to create the desired Hindu
alternative.

(4) Realise that there is no sense in talking

about Hindu consciousness and Hindu vote bank unless
that consciousness is channelised for political action
and a political platform is created in whose favour the
Hindu vote bank may issue its cheques. The Hindus
working in Congress and other opposition parties can not
be trusted because they are bound by their manifestoes.

(5) Give due importance to the time factor. This

has become all the more important because of the fast
changing political situation. An early dissolution of
the present Lok Sloha can not be ruled out. Therefore,
Hindu alternative must be ready within a few months.

The proposed Hindu alternative must have

saffron flag, its commitment to Hindu Rashtra should be
open and unequivocal and the alternative leadershp it
projects must have a Hindu image and also a clean image
free of corruption.

Time for decision for R.S.S. leadership

has come. If it fails now, it will be doing the greatest
harm not only to Hinclustan and Hindus but also to
itself. It would be betraying the heritage of Dr.
Hedgewar and Shri Golvalkar and the trust of countries
people who have toiled for decades to build up R.S.S.
and its front organisations.

Necessity is the mother of invention. A

Hindu alternative in the form of Shiv Sena has emerged
in Maharashtra inspite of R.S.S. and B.J.P. A similar
phenomenon may take place in other parts of the country
also inspite of R.S.S. and B.J.P. in the days to come.
But it may take time and Hindus cause may suffer by
default , In that case R.S.S. leadership may also become
a target of attack along with B.J.P. leadership all over
the country for betraying the Hindus. It is to be hoped
and wished that R.S.S. leadership will wake up in time
and not allow such a situation to arise.

Bal Raj Madhok