1,1K vistas

Cargado por anon-326759

- 2016 Sample Paper 12 Physics 04
- ajay
- 09X-rays
- Antennas and Propagation for Wireless Communication Systems, 2nd Ed
- Physics 2008
- TOFD Technique for Weld Inspection
- Syllabus 08 Ece
- Sem I (E group).pdf
- B.Tech_1st_&_2nd_Sem
- Geometric Optics for a Coupling Model of Electromagnetic and Gravitational
- Book - GO - Geometrical Theory diffraction for EM - Graeme
- Atoll 2.8.2 Model Calibration Guide E0
- 3)_Платформа_симуляции_Симулинк_для_систем_передачи_фотонов.docx
- Diffraction
- X-Ray Diffraction
- SICK VL180-2P42436
- tmpBD87.tmp
- Lecture 21 Optical MEMS
- Resume No Phone Martinez
- Gordon-poster (Sph-PC's Conflicted Copy 2016-07-06)

Está en la página 1de 4

Computation Method Based on the Complete Fresnel

Theory and a Recursive Series Expansion Method

Hatem Mokhtari

the surface Fresnel integral (SFI) which enables a rigorous

computation of the double knife-edge diffraction. The proposed

method, which is based upon an analytical series calculation

for the SFI, becomes valid whatever the conditions of recep-

tion. Besides, the mathematical procedure that is proposed here

involves the incident shadow boundary neighborhood for both

knife-edge obstacles. Results are compared with some reference

well-known values which correspond to asymptotic cases, the Fig. 1. Geometry of double knife-edge system.

global system for mobile communications (GSM) and DCS1800

frequency bands, and a set of measurements. The suggested ana-

lytical method has been shown to be in very good agreement with the surface Fresnel integral (SFI) [6]. The authors considered

these expected particular theoretical values and field-strength

the diffracting screens to be nonabsorbent which simplifies

measurements, where different shadowing conditions, including

frequency dependence such as mobile communications bands, notably their formalism. The used assumptions will neither

have been considered for the sake of comparisons. be modified nor extended to any specific type of frequency-

dispersive screen. Only secondary sources will be considered

Index Terms— Diffraction, Fresnel theory, surface Fresnel in-

tegral. and screens assumed to be perfectly conductive, as the initial

investigation of Millington’s work stated.

The purpose of our investigation is to first give a quick

I. INTRODUCTION overview of this analytical method, to study in which con-

ditions it can be valid, and finally suggest a mathematical

T HE RADIO-WAVE propagation which involves diffrac-

tion, reflection, and refraction is an essential phenomenon

especially for field-strength prediction regardless of the con-

treatment for the SFI using a series expansion recursive

calculations which allow a comprehensive range of validity

cerned service or system, and many authors have been inter- of this analytical computation method.

ested by the behavior of the interaction of waves with obsta- As it has been previously pointed out, our efforts have been

cles. Diffraction is one of these important physical phenomena focused on how can this SFI be generalized and applied to

which have been investigated using different philosophies. The any receiving situation. Indeed, as a reminder, Millington et

most commonly studied methods are geometrical theory of al. [6] have derived asymptotic expressions for the SFI, but

diffraction (GTD), which is well known as an extension of the only restricted cases have been studied, namely, the situations

geometrical optics and involves polarizations and the physical where the observation point is located “deep in the shadow”

properties of the obstacles [1], and the Huyghens’ principal- for either obstacles or receiver, or in the case where either

based scalar approach [2], which considers only the secondary obstacle lies on the line of sight of the other.

fictive sources above each obstacle and, thus, by essence, does The calculations of the SFI that are considered in this paper

not consider dispersive lossy edges. Besides, there has been find their application especially in the case where optical rays

a great deal of simplifying methods whose formalism derives lie in this vicinity of the direct incident shadow boundaries

somehow from one of these two main approaches, such as (i.e., for both obstacles and the receiver), since accurate results

the Bullington [3] and Deygout [4] methods. Moreover, as a are given by Millington et al. in the asymptotic conditions (i.e.,

reference accurate method, Millington et al. [5] proposed an line of sight case and severe diffracting conditions). Moreover,

analytical calculation method for the attenuation by diffraction since the problem is of a mathematical nature, we find it

due to two successive obstacles. In their paper, they have necessary to describe in detail our procedure through the next

made use of the complete Fresnel theory which, thus, takes sections starting with an overview of its initial formulations.

account of the Huyghens’ principal and leads to the use of

II. OVERVIEW OF MILLINGTON’S METHOD

Manuscript received September 19, 1996; revised August 18, 1997. A double knife-edge geometry is illustrated in Fig. 1, where

The author is with the Cellular Engineering Technical Group, MOBISTAR

N.V., 1200 Brussels, Belgium. one can easily see the different utilized parameters according

Publisher Item Identifier S 0018-9545(99)00780-X. to the work achieved by Millington et al. [5].

0018–9545/99$10.00 1999 IEEE

590 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 48, NO. 2, MARCH 1999

The method as described in Millington’s paper neglects the computation method for solving (9) is merely based upon the

lateral profile effect and considers only vertical Huyghens’ series expansion of [8] given by

sources which led the authors to the expression for the

diffracted electric field at the receiver (see Fig. 1) divided

by the free-space one. The ratio of these two fields reads

(10)

(1)

and substituting (10) into (9) gives

where the used parameters are given by

(2)

(3) (11)

or in a different form, assuming the convergence of the series

(4) in (11), as follows:

(5)

(6) (12)

and for the sake of computing (12), one could define a complex

(7)

variable

set of conditions only as we have mentioned above.

remains then incompletely studied especially for intermediate Using a single integration by parts of (13), the following

values of Our mathematical calculations allow an accurate recursive equation is easily derived:

determination of in the case where lies within a

range of finite small values. Referring to the above-mentioned

(14)

paper [6], which describes the whole method of computing the

SFI, we may write in the following form:

Equation (14) is valid whatever be with the initial

(8) condition given by

(15)

where

which leads to the calculation of in (12) as the form below

(9)

(16)

When is sufficiently high, one can easily derive the

Epstein–Peterson model [7] which considers the case where where

the individual Fresnel parameters and of the obstacles to

be greater than 1.5. Accordingly, one should compute the cor- (17)

rection factor as it has been proved to be sin in Millington’s

paper [5]. At this stage, no intermediary expression, regarding and

the diffraction conditions, is available which led us to consider

this interesting situation especially when the diffracted ray lies (18)

within a reasonable range around the direct incident shadow

Finally, substituting (16) into (8) yields

boundary.

Since propagation depends upon several parameters such (19)

as frequency, distances, and heights, we find it interesting

to examine the situations where shadowing conditions (i.e., Indeed, the very fast convergence of the series in (19)

for both obstacle or receiver) are not very severe so as to allowed us to sum its terms up to an integer fixed value, say

complete the range of validity of Millington’s approach. Our , which is sufficiently high to obtain the required

MOKHTARI: COMPREHENSIVE DOUBLE KNIFE-EDGE DIFFRACTION COMPUTATION METHOD 591

ASYMPTOTIC CASES i), ii), AND iii) INPUT PARAMETERS FOR THE PREDICTION

* Computed with the new approach using the series solution given by (19)

TABLE II TABLE IV

ASYMPTOTIC CASE iv) FREQUENCY =

900 AND 1800 MHz, RESPECTIVELY PROPAGATION LOSS WHEN THE DIFFRACTED RAY IS IN

THE VICINITY OF THE INCIDENT SHADOW BOUNDARY

* Computed with the new approach using the series solution given by (19)

** See (20) * Computed with the new approach using the series solution given by (19)

accuracy. Beyond that value (i.e., ), the series which is, by evidence, a frequency-dependent parameter and

remains constant. Concerning the computation time, no more can be identified as the Fresnel parameter related to the

than 3.62 s are spent on a PC 80486/ 66 MHz when main obstacle as it is commonly used in single knife-edge

which is quite acceptable. diffraction calculation. That is the reason why in Table II the

operating frequency has been taken into account. Furthermore,

IV. EXAMPLES OF CALCULATION AND NUMERICAL RESULTS the relation in (21) is seemingly an appropriate asymptotic

approximation for the attenuation by diffraction in the case

As it has been stated previously, different situations for the where the Fresnel parameter exceeds 1.5. Also, in this case

receiver are taken into account in view of testing our method. (see Table II), results are in very good agreement.

For the sake of comparisons, we find it quite helpful to verify Coming now to the case where the diffracting conditions for

the validity of our calculations [i.e., (19) especially] in some both obstacles are neither severe nor on line of sight asymp-

particular asymptotic cases. The considered situations are those totic situations, we suggest to compare some experimental

where: 1) distances and are of equal spacing and both results in view of a realistic comparison of our method with the

obstacles of negligible heights; 2) obstacles are sufficiently measurements. Hence, results are reported in Table IV, where

separated and both obstacles of negligible heights; 3) obstacles individual Fresnel parameters have been added in order to

are very close to each other and both obstacles of negligible recognize that propagation is really around the incident shadow

heights; and 4) finally one obstacle is in the line of sight of boundaries. Table III summarizes the used parameters which

the remaining one. have been used by Giovanelli et al. [9].

In the case where the diffracted ray lies within a reasonable * Computed with the new approach using the series solution

range around the incident shadow boundary, some results are given by (19).

thus given in order to show that in such case our method It can be noticed that, from Table IV, also for that case

yields very good agreement with measurements and can also the Millington et al. method remains in very good agreement

be suitable for land mobile radio communications frequencies. with the experimental data. Furthermore, the prediction by the

Furthermore, frequency is assumed to be a fixed value since Epstein–Peterson method gives the worst value, which is quite

the purpose is to compare the validity of our computation expectable because of its limited range of validity. Besides,

method on the basis of one tested frequency value at a time. prediction by means of the Deygout procedure reveals that the

Results are reported in Tables I–III. propagation loss is slightly pessimistic in view of the obtained

Since the second obstacle lies in the line of sight of the first value.

one, its height is accordingly taken as (see Table II)

(20)

V. CONCLUSION

Referring once again to Millington’s work, the attenuation The computation of the SFI is indeed analytically intractable

in this case is given by unless one could use numerical two-dimensional (2-D) im-

proper integration which is well known as a time-consuming

(21)

procedure. However, Millington et al. [5] solved this problem

in some conditions using series expansion and appropriate

where the dimensionless parameter is given by approximations for a limiting set of conditions. Besides, the

method we have proposed in this investigation, which has been

(22) tested in several diffracting conditions, has been proved to be

accurate enough to be taken as a comprehensive method for

592 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 48, NO. 2, MARCH 1999

the double knife-edge diffraction calculation using the Fresnel [5] G. Millington, R. Hewitt, and F. S. Immirzi, “Double knife-edge

scalar approach derived by Millington et al. analyses. diffraction in field-strength prediction,” in IEE Monograph 507E, Mar.

1962, pp. 419–429.

However, since the novel proposed approach gives very [6] G. Millington, R. Hewitt, and F. S. Immirzi, “The Fresnel surface

good results with the asymptotic Epstein–Peterson method integral,” in IEE Monograph 508E, Mar. 1962, pp. 430–437.

[7] J. Esptein and D. W. Peterson, “An experimental study of wave

[7], where the diffracting conditions are very severe, for propagation at 830 Mc,” Proc. IRE, vol 41, no. 5, pp. 595–611, 1953.

computation time reasons, one could use this approximation [8] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series and

rather than the series approach as it has been studied in this Products. New York: Academic, 1980.

[9] C. L. Giovanelli, “An analysis of simplified solutions for multiple knife-

paper. However, in intermediate diffracting conditions, our edge diffraction,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-32, pp.

method becomes more suitable in view of its accuracy as 297–301, Mar. 1984.

mentioned by the comparisons. [10] L. E. Vogler, “The attenuation of electromagnetic waves by multiple

knife-edge diffraction,” NTIA Rep. 20, Boulder, CO, Oct. 1981.

Furthermore, the implemented series expansion and iter-

ations method can be extended to the multiple knife-edge

problem which has been studied by Vogler [10] whose diffrac-

tion model is limited to up to ten obstacles. However, our Hattem Mokhtari was born on September 18, 1964 in Constantine, Algeria.

series expansion approach requires, for the multiple diffracting He received the B.S. degree in physics electronics from the University

of Constantine, Constantine, in 1986, the M.S. degree in electronics from

edges, a rigorous study of convergence since the integration the University of Nancy, Nancy, France, in 1987, and the Ph.D. degree in

domain becomes a hypervolume rather than a 2-D surface as electronics from the University of Metz, France, in 1992, where he worked

it has been previously demonstrated. on guided multiwire propagation phenomena such as in-circular lossy tunnels.

In September 1992, he joined TDF-C2R, the research center of

TéléDiffusion de France, where he was involved in several projects dealing

with frequency planning in radio communications and broadcasting networks,

REFERENCES radio-wave propagation modeling, planning tools design, and antenna pattern

synthesis and theoretical modeling. Since September 1997, he has been with

[1] R. J. Luebbers, “Finite conductivity uniform GTD versus knife-edge Mobistar, Brussels, Belgium, the second Belgian GSM operator, where he

diffraction in prediction of propagation path loss,” IEEE Trans. Antennas is in charge of radio parameters optimization and implementation of modern

Propagat., vol. AP-32, pp. 70–75, Jan. 1984. features such as microcellular concepts and slow-frequency hopping in view

[2] C. A. Balanis, Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics. New York: of reducing the effect of interferences in dense urban environments and,

Wiley, 1989. hence, improving the overall speech quality and geographical coverage. He is

[3] K. Bullington, “Radio propagation at frequencies about 30 Mc,” Proc. the author of several technical papers, most of them dedicated to theoretical

IRE, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1122–1136, 1947. upstream research topics. He was designated as a potential evaluator within the

[4] J. Deygout, “Multiple knife-edge diffraction of microwaves,” IEEE European Commission for the behalf of “Telematics Applications Programme”

Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-14, no. 4, pp. 480–489, 1966. projects from 1997 to 1998.

- 2016 Sample Paper 12 Physics 04Cargado porOliver Queen
- ajayCargado porDpp Dpp
- 09X-raysCargado porrkred
- Antennas and Propagation for Wireless Communication Systems, 2nd EdCargado porthamtunhi1309
- Physics 2008Cargado porMuhammad Qasim
- TOFD Technique for Weld InspectionCargado porvenkat
- Syllabus 08 EceCargado porAjay Nath S A
- Sem I (E group).pdfCargado porSunil Giri
- B.Tech_1st_&_2nd_SemCargado porPromila Jangra
- Geometric Optics for a Coupling Model of Electromagnetic and GravitationalCargado poralfonso
- Book - GO - Geometrical Theory diffraction for EM - GraemeCargado porSendyPhang
- Atoll 2.8.2 Model Calibration Guide E0Cargado porSantiago Arenas
- 3)_Платформа_симуляции_Симулинк_для_систем_передачи_фотонов.docxCargado porDaniel Fletcher
- DiffractionCargado porThamani Wijesinghe
- X-Ray DiffractionCargado porSabyasachi Dasgupta
- SICK VL180-2P42436Cargado porvinaomatos
- tmpBD87.tmpCargado porFrontiers
- Lecture 21 Optical MEMSCargado pormervin.jacob
- Resume No Phone MartinezCargado porKrzysztof Kiersnowski
- Gordon-poster (Sph-PC's Conflicted Copy 2016-07-06)Cargado porchaya
- Lecture 24Cargado porAnonymous ETPqS5NG9
- Diffraction SlidesCargado porPreethi Lakshmi
- presentation draft rev 1 3Cargado porapi-251382553
- X-ray Patterns 2Cargado porBuri Bhuvana
- Radio Wave PropagationCargado porBenNewton1
- Heisenberg derivationCargado porvijay
- leph207Cargado porDinesh Pancholi
- 04-TransmissionMediaCargado porkrishnadasmithra
- SYLLABUSCargado porsmileofsun4656
- UntitledCargado poreurolex

- Surface RoughnessCargado porAlexandre Melo
- Lecture Demonstration of Fresnel Diffraction by a Slit and Half-PlaneCargado porRenxian Li
- 7-MultipathCargado porMelania Dîmbeanu
- DiffractionCargado porg_vasumails71579
- HuygensCargado porRizka
- ShiVa Book Update for v18Cargado porJoey Peng
- Diffraction Loss-rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3Cargado porkolkata_76154954
- Photonics: a Short Course--Springer (2014)Cargado porEli Gerber
- Deterministic phase retrieval: a Green’s function solutionCargado porlednakashim
- 00042678Cargado porСтас Ш.
- Diffraction opticsCargado porLauren Stevenson
- CRS_Based Minimum Aperture Time MigrationCargado porAndi Mahri
- Seismic ResolutionCargado porlomier
- 04103146Cargado porAbdallah Omar Al Ayoubi
- Computer Simulation of Fresnel Diffraction from Triple Apertures by Iterative Fresnel Integrals MethodCargado porSEP-Publisher
- Artikel Fisika Bahasa Inggris Tentang Optik-3Cargado porXerxes Xanthe Xyza
- Fresnel DiffractionCargado porhungvt_nan
- Fresnel Zone ClearanceCargado porMalay Palai
- Diffraction LabCargado porBrett Scheiner
- Microwaveradiolinkdesign 150402080315 Conversion Gate01Cargado porJawad Maal
- Interference Physics LabCargado porShoumit Sarkar
- Barrier ReportCargado porKevin Bilton
- Laporan spektrometer kisiCargado porLarra Retha Melina
- Cell Planning Fundamentals_documentCargado porPratim
- Fresnel and Fraunhofer DiffractionCargado pormaitham100
- Fresnel diffraction.pdfCargado pornithin_v90
- 13.Fresnel diffraction.pptCargado porAras Hanif
- Introduction to Fourier Optics (J. Goodman 2nd sCargado porlinutez
- Paper 22-A Fresnelet-Based Encryption of Medical Images Using Arnold TransformCargado porEditor IJACSA
- Introduction to Modern Digital Holography With Matlab.pdfCargado porjuaco8888