Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
in/judiciary/view/42/
TaxGuru.in
Username ●●●●●●●● Log In Remember
Log In Me | Register |Forgot Password
Sign Up
Search Visit
Random Member
Home Random Communities
Forums Random Blog
Communities
Files
Articles
Experts
Blogs
Activity
News
Classifieds
More
Blog Posts
About
ADVERTISE
BUDGET
Service Tax
Pollsarchive
Income Tax
ITR
Wealth Tax
Partnership
Privacy
Payments to non-residents would be subject to withholding tax only if the income is chargeable to tax- SC
Brief : Appellant(s) are the distributors of imported prepackaged shrink wrapped standardized software from Microsoft and other
Suppliers outside India. During the relevant assessment year(s) appellant(s) made payments to the said software Suppliers which
according to the appellant(s) represented the purchase price of the abovementioned software. The ITO(TDS) held that since the sale
of software included a license to use the same, payments made by the appellant(s) to the foreign Suppliers constituted royalty, which
was deemed to accrue or arise in India. Therefore, TAS was liable to be deducted under Section 195 of the I.T. Act. The said finding of
the ITO(TDS) was upheld by the Commissioner (A). In second appeal, the ITAT, however, held that the amount paid by appellant(s) to
the foreign software Suppliers was not “royalty” and the same did not give rise to any income taxable in India, and therefore, the
appellant(s) was not liable to deduct TAS.
Citation : GE India Technology Centre Private Ltd. Civil Appeal Nos. 7541-7542 of 2010 dated 9 September March 2010
Judgement :
Facts
1 of 6 04/10/2010 12:48 PM
Payments to non-residents would be subject to withholding tax only if the ... http://taxguru.in/judiciary/view/42/
appellant(s) to the foreign software Suppliers was not “royalty” and the same did not give
rise to any income taxable in India, and therefore, the appellant(s) was not liable to
deduct TAS
· On an appeal to the High Court (HC), the revenue authorities, raised an additional
contention that unless the payer makes an application to the tax officer under Section
195(2) and has obtained a permission for non-deduction of the TAS, it was not
permissible for the payer to contend that the payment made to the nonresident did not
give rise to “income” taxable in India and that, therefore, there was no need to deduct
any TAS
· The High Court, without addressing the question of taxability of the payments, accepted
the contention of the revenue authorities. Hence, the appellant(s) preferred the appeal to
the SC
Issue:
· Whether the HC was right in holding that the moment there is remittance the obligation to
TAS arises?
Ruling of the SC
· The SC outlined the provisions relevant to the case, to state that Section 195 imposes a
statutory obligation on any person responsible for paying to a non-resident, any interest (not
being interest on securities) or any other sum (not being dividend) chargeable under the
provisions of the Act, to deduct income tax at the rates in force.
· The SC emphasised that the most important expression in Section 195(1) consists of the
words “sums chargeable under the provisions of the Act”. A person paying interest or any
other sum to a non-resident is not liable to deduct tax if such sum is not chargeable to tax
under the Act. The phrase “Sums chargeable” under the provisions of the Act would refer
to such amounts, which should have an element of income in them as required under the
provisions of the Act, and the treaty provisions, and hence would be liable to tax under the
Act
· In other words, the SC indicated that the remittance has got to be a receipt, the whole or
part of which is liable to tax in India.
· Section 195 contemplates not merely amounts, the whole of which are pure income
2 of 6 04/10/2010 12:48 PM
Payments to non-residents would be subject to withholding tax only if the ... http://taxguru.in/judiciary/view/42/
payments, but also covers composite payments which has an element of income
embedded or incorporated in them
· Comparing the various provisions on TAS under the Act, the SC observed that there are
different expressions used. However, the expression “sum chargeable under the
provisions of the Act” is used only in Section 195 and hence has to be read in conformity
with the charging provisions, i.e., Sections 4, 5 and 9
· The SC while referring to some other judicial pronouncements, reiterated that where the
payment made by the resident to the nonresident was an amount which was not
chargeable to tax in India, then no tax is deductible at source even though the assessee
had not made an application. Further an application for an NOC (under para materia
provisions of the earlier Act) could not be considered as an application for determining
the tax payable on the income to be remitted by the payer
· Explaining the provision further, the SC stated that the application of Section 195(2)
pre-supposes that where the person responsible for making the payment to the
non-resident considers that tax is payable in respect of some part of the amount to be
remitted to a non-resident, but is not sure as to what should be the portion so taxable or the
amount of tax to be deducted
· The obligation to deduct TAS is limited to the appropriate proportion of income chargeable
under the Act forming part of the gross sum of money payable to the non-resident. This
obligation being limited to the appropriate proportion of income flows from the words used
in Section 195(1), namely, “chargeable under the provisions of the Act”
· The SC rejected the contention of the department, that the assessee make an application in
every case of remittance even when the income has no territorial nexus with India or is not
chargeable in India., The SC also observed that accepting the contention of the revenue
authorities would mean obliteration of the expression “sum chargeable under the provisions
of the Act” from Section 195(1)
· Further, the SC held that while explaining Transmission judgment observed that the plain
words of Section 195(1) which in clear terms laid down that tax at source is deductible only
from “sums chargeable” under the provisions of the Act, i.e., chargeable under Sections 4,
3 of 6 04/10/2010 12:48 PM
Payments to non-residents would be subject to withholding tax only if the ... http://taxguru.in/judiciary/view/42/
· After concluding that the provisions of section 195(1) and 195(2) the SC remitted the
matter back to the HC to decide the question on taxability of the payments made for the
software and consequently the obligation to deduct tax at source as the HC has not
addressed the issue on merits.
Conclusion: - The ruling has laid down an important principle which has to be considered for
TAS on payments made to non-residents i.e. only where the payments are chargeable as income
would there be an obligation on the payer to TAS. It thus provides much clarity on the obligation
of the payer to deduct tax when effecting payments to a non-resident. A payer making a
remittance to a non-resident, could make an application to the tax officer, where he not sure as to
what should be the portion so taxable or is not sure as to the amount of tax to be deducted
Judiciary
Quick Links
›› Submit Judiciary
›› Supreme Court Judgements
›› Search Judiciary
Blog Posts
Popular | Recent |
›› CPT Online Examination date, Center, Registration date, Eligibility date, last date announced
›› All about deduction under section 80C and tax planning
›› Public Provident Fund (PPF) scheme : Investment Limit, Income tax benefit, Features
›› Bangalore Income Tax department, Central Processing Center (CPC) Helpline Number
›› Download ITR 1, ITR 2, ITR 3, ITR 4, ITR 5, ITR 6, ITR 7, ITR 8, and ITR V in Excel Format for A.Y. 2009-10
Members
Bevin Thomas
registered 8 minutes ago
4 of 6 04/10/2010 12:48 PM
Payments to non-residents would be subject to withholding tax only if the ... http://taxguru.in/judiciary/view/42/
Kunal Badgujar
registered 15 minutes ago
trofimenkoaleksey
registered 29 minutes ago
Ritesh Vimal
registered 31 minutes ago
Communities
Income Tax
82 members
Accountant
40 members
Corpoarate Laws
38 members
T.D.S
38 members
Bookmarks
Add To Favorites
Online Users
0 users online
Subscribe to feed
5 of 6 04/10/2010 12:48 PM
Payments to non-residents would be subject to withholding tax only if the ... http://taxguru.in/judiciary/view/42/
Delivered by Taxguru
Home | Forum portal | Community | Files | Articles | Experts | Blog | Activity | News | Newspaper | Classifieds | Members | Notifications
| Web Directory | Coaching Centres | Judiciary | Bookmarks | Top Members | C A Students | Who is where | Chat | Scorecard |
Feedback | Poll Archive | Taxguru on Desktop | E-Books | Album | Download Toolbar | Video
ShareThis
6 of 6 04/10/2010 12:48 PM