Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
-378
Copyright 0 1995 Else&r Science Limited
Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
0260~8774/95/$9.50
ELSEVIER 0260-8774(94)00054-9
Research Note
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Fully mature, unripe (green) bananas of the Dwarf Scavendish and Nendran
varieties were procured from Bhopal and Coimbatore markets, respectively.
The bananas were separated visually into four groups according to their size.
Four bananas were chosen from each group for the determination of
physical constituents and properties. The peel and pulp were weighed
separately for individual bananas to determine the pulp to peel ratio.
The moisture content was determined by placing 35-4-O mm thick
banana slices with and without peel in a single layer, in an aluminium dish
in a hot air oven, at 130f 1°C for 1.5 h (Rameshbabu & Nayak, 1993).
The specific gravity of banana was determined by using the toluene
displacement method (Mohsenin, 1980). Specific gravity was measured at
three different locations in the fruit, i.e. top, middle and tail end of the fruit
(Fig. 1). The top is defined as the end of the fruit which was attached to the
plant.
The physical properties, size and peel thickness were determined using
Vernier calipers having a least count of 0.05 mm. The diameter of the
banana with and without peel were recorded at six planes of cut along the
longitudinal axis of the fruit, two planes falling in each of the top, middle
and tail end of the fruit (Fig. 1). At each plane of cut (Dl-D6), the
diameter was measured at four places.
The shape of the banana with and without peel was plotted keeping the
fruit resting on its most stable position and then the effective length and
width were measured (Fig. 1). Stainless steel string was used for banana
slicing as proposed for the machine. For proper size selection of the wire,
Physical and mechanical properties of green banana jkuit
The load against depth of cut was recorded continuously. After shearing
of the banana pulp was complete, the plane of cut was plotted on paper and
its area was determined by using a graphical method so that mechanical data
per unit area of cut could be determined.
The physical constituents of banana fruit as a per cent weight of whole fruit
and the pulp-peel ratio are reported in Table 1. The pulp to peel ratio for
Dwarf Scavendish variety of banana varies between 1.18 and 159 with an
average value of l-39 at a moisture content of 264.17% (db) and 666.28%
(db) of pulp and peel, respectively. These values for the Nendran variety
were 2.05 and 2.61, respectively with an average of 2.32 at a pulp moisture
content of 153.39% (db) and peel moisture content of 516.41% (db).
The peel thickness was measured for both the varieties at the peel
moisture content of 666.28% (db) and 516.41% (db) for Dwarf Scavendish
and Nendran varieties, respectively. For the Dwarf Scavendish variety, peel
thickness varied from 3.38 mm to 4.48 mm, the average being 3.65 mm. For
the Nendran variety, these values were found to be 2.55 mm and 3.55 mm,
respectively, with an average of 2.95 mm. The banana peel is formed by 3-5
longitudinal planes and the joint of these planes forms a ridge. The
thickness of peel is more at these ridges than other places. Figure 2 shows
the peel planes, ridges and typical cross-section of raw banana fruit of both
varieties.
Table 2 shows the range of average diameter at various planes of cut of
the banana fruit with and without peel, for both the tested varieties. It can
be seen that the diameter of fruit is less at both the ends and maximum in
the middle portion. The maximum and minimum observed diameters for
Dwarf Scavendish and Nendran banana with peel were 30.86 mm, 18.44 and
TABLE 1
Constituents of Banana Fruit
Dwarf Scavendish
Average 89.69 58.10 41.90 245.7 669.8 1.39
Maximum 97.84 61.35 4577 252.4 708.4 1.59
Minimum 79.97 54.23 38.65 239.0 599.8 1.18
Standard deviation 5.15 2.24 2.24 0.13
Nendran
Average 126.16 69.77 30.23 154,l 516.4 2.32
Maximum 201.43 72.32 32.78 168.6 542.2 2.61
Minimum 76.25 67.25 27.68 145-l 486.2 2-05
Standard deviation 38.77 l-65 l-65 0.18
Physical and mechanical properties of green banana fruit 373
(0 (ii)
Three planes (Dwarf Scavendish) Five planes (Dwarf Scavendisb)
3.50 mm
(iii) (iv)
Four planes (Nendran) Four planes (Nendran)
Fig. 2. Typical cross-section (X-X’ of Fig. I) of banana fruit showing peel and pulp
portion.
40.86 mm, 17.01 mm, respectively. These values for the fruit without peel
are 23.34 mm, 15.19 mm and 37.08 mm, 11.76 mm, respectively (Table 2).
Table 3 gives the specific gravity of various parts of banana fruit, peel and
pulp. It is evident, that the pulp portion has the maximum specific gravity
for both varieties of banana. The peel of Dwarf Scavendish banana has a
higher specific gravity (0.943) than the whole fruit (0.933) containing peel
and pulp. This may be because of the presence of air voids in between peel
and pulp in this particular variety. However, the peel of Nendran banana
has a lower specific gravity (O-948) than the whole fruit (1.005). It was also
found that the middle part of the fruit has a higher specific gravity than its
top and tail ends, because of its higher moisture content than the other two
parts (Table 3).
A typical graphical output from the universal testing machine
representing load against the depth of cut is shown in Fig. 3. The average,
maximum and minimum values (and their standard deviations) of maximum
374 R. F Kachru, N. Kotwaliwale, D. Balasubramanian
TABLE2
Diameter of Banana Fruit at Various Planes of Cut
Variety Condition
(E) (tfz, (rz, (::) (rz) (Lz)
*Refer to Fig. 1.
TABLE 3
Specific Gravity of Banana Fruit
I Top
I I I I
i ’ i I
4 I I
I I ,
I
i i i 4 I
I
Middle
--U
I I
I
Middle
i I i ’
i 1i i ’
j
i i i %
I i
1 Tail
I I I
I 1 , I
16
8 8 16 24 32
Load, N Load, N
(Var. Dwarf Scavendish) (Var. Nendran)
Fig. 3. Graphical output by lnstron machine for load vs. depth of cut in banana fruit
pulp: (a) Dwarf Scavendish; (h) Nendran.
load, total energy required for cut, and energy requirement per unit area of
cut are reported in Table 4. The maximum load required for cutting the
banana slice is higher for the Nendran variety (28.2 N) than for the Dwarf
Scavendish variety (22.4 N). Similarly, the load required per unit width of
cut is higher for the Nendran variety than for the Dwarf Scavendish variety
(Table 4). However, the position and the part of fruit does not have any
significant effect over the load per unit width.
It is observed that the average energy requirement per unit area of cut of
banana is maximum when kept in the convex position (Table 4), while the
energy requirement per unit area of cut is minimum in the concave position.
TABLE4
Mechanical Properties of Banana Fruit Pulp
W
Variety Position Part of Cross-sectional Maximum Total Energy Load d
of fruit fruit area of cut load (N) energy for per unit per unit
(mm2) cut (J) area (J/m ‘) width (N/mm)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (6) (7)
Dlwarf Convex Top
Scavendish Average 640.67 17.67 0.386 599.11 0.618
Maximum 787.00 20.40 0.505 686.81 0,716
Minimum 0.512 ?J
506.00 13.00 0.258 508.89
Standard deviation 86.62 2.39 0.075 58.73 0.060 3
Middle x
0.597 “S
f:
Average 716.17 17.97 0.413 573.48
Maximum 825.00 19.40 0.525 639.31 0.640
Minimum 649.00 15.40 0.338 490.55 0.520 2
Standard deviation 65.21 1.37 0.072 52.70 0,037
Tail
Average 604.67 16.77 0.333 548.25 0.604
Maximum 705.00 19.00 0.425 615.02 0.702 5’
Minimum 537.00 14.00 0.285 473.08 0.515 k
_m
Standard deviation 53.42 1.96 0.053 48.99 0.063 b
Y
Concave Top
Average 673.50 16.70 0,342 5 12.93 0.569 b
2
Maximum 806.00 18.60 0.420 582.57 0.612 E
Minimum 545.00 14.60 0.283 424.94 0.528 &
Standard deviation 94.64 1.29 0.043 58.44 0,033 a
Middle 2
Average 788.00 17.60 0.351 446.93 0.556 3
-.
Maximum 826.00 18.80 0.420 541.24 0.580 f
Minimum 753.00 16.80 0.310 379.44 O-532
Standard deviation 25.58 0.68 0.034 51.82 0.015
Tail
Average 664.33 16.90 0.338 508.56 0,583
Maximum 735.00 18.20 0.383 592.11 0.641
Minimum 570.00 15.80 0.285 470.30 0,524
Standard deviation 62.20 0.90 0.038 40.84 0.037
TABLE 4 Conrd.
Plain Top
Average 668.83 19.07 0.371 558.48 0.644
Maximum 744.00 22.40 0.398 658.11 0.754
Minimum 604.00 16.40 0.345 504.20 0,544
Standard deviation 51.08 1.83 0.017 52.31 0.069
Middle
Average 747.67 18.60 0.386 5 16.52 0.612
Maximum 770.00 20.40 0.423 564.09 0.659
Minimum 733.00 16.00 0.355 484.3 1 0543
Standard deviation 13.56 1.70 0.023 28.18 0.042
Tail
Average 608.17 15.60 0.317 517.82 0.565
Maximum 695.00 16.40 0.385 555.56 0.616
Minimum 361.00 12.20 0.173 477.84 0.547
Standard deviation 120.05 1.53 0.069 26.30 0.024
Nandran Plain TOP
Average 702.00 23.80 0.403 593.02 0.725
Maximum 807.00 28.20 0.433 724.46 0.821
Minimum 597.00 19.40 0.373 461.59 0.629
Standard deviation 105.00 4.40 0.030 131.43 0.096
Middle
Average 836.50 19.80 0.43 1 521.48 0.660
Maximum 927.00 22.00 0.433 576.41 0.701
Minimum 746.00 17.60 0.430 466.56 0.619
Standard deviation 90.50 2.20 0.001 54.94 0.041
Tail
Average 704.00 20.70 0.365 524.71 0.688
Maximum 774.00 24.80 0.373 587.54 0.774
Minimum 634.00 16.60 0.358 461.89 0.602
Standard deviation 70.00 4.10 0.007 62.83 O.086
378 R. P Kachru, N. Kotwaliwale,D. Balasubramanian
However, when the fruit is kept in the plain position, the average energy
requirement per unit area is approximately mid-way between the other two
positions. In the convex position, some energy is required for bending the
fruit prior to piercing. In this position, the fruit is supported at its two
extreme ends and the moment arm for bending is positive and maximum,
whereas, in the concave and plain positions, the moment arm is zero but the
base contact is single point and multi-point, respectively. Therefore, the
energy requirement per unit area of cut of the banana pulp is maximum in
the convex position followed by the plain and concave positions. It is
therefore inferred that plain is the best position for slicing. This provides
such advantages as: the fruit remains in the most stable condition, energy
requirement for the performance of cut is moderate and the slices of the top
and tail ends are not oval shaped.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors acknowledge, with thanks, the support and facilities provided by
the Director, Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal, India,
and the Director, Regional Research Laboratory (CSIR), Bhopal, India, in
carrying out this research.
REFERENCES