Está en la página 1de 20

United States war crimes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_crimes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
United States war crimes are the violations of the laws and customs of war of which the United
States Armed Forces are accused of committing since the signing of the Hague Conventions of 1899
and 1907. These have included the summary execution of captured enemy combatants,
the mistreatment of prisoners during interrogation (torture), and the use of violence
against civilian non-combatants.
War crimes can be prosecuted in the United States through the War Crimes Act of 1996. However,
the U.S. Government, which strongly opposes the International Criminal Court (ICC) treaty, arguing
that the Court lacks checks and balances,[1] and thus does not accept ICC jurisdiction over its
nationals.[2][3]

Contents

 1Mexican–American War
 2Philippine–American War
 3World War II
o 3.1Pacific theater
 3.1.1Rape
o 3.2European theater
 3.2.1Rape
 4Korean War
o 4.1No Gun Ri Massacre
 5Vietnam War
o 5.1My Lai Massacre
 6Gulf War
o 6.1Highway of Death
 7War on Terror
o 7.1Command responsibility
 8See also
o 8.1General
o 8.2World War II
o 8.3Vietnam War
o 8.4War on Terror (2001–2006 period)
o 8.5Afghanistan
o 8.6Iraq War
 9References
 10Further reading
o 10.1General
o 10.2By nation
 11External links
Mexican–American War[edit]
When Zachary Taylor began leading American soldiers into Mexico the U.S troops under the
watchful eye of Taylor at first adhered to the rules of war for the most part and almost exclusively
engaged only with enemy soldiers. This gained them some popularity with Mexican civilians who
held the occupying Americans in a degree of high regard compared to the Mexican Army who left
their wounded to be captured by the enemy as they retreated from the area. In June 1846, this
changed when American reinforcements entered the area and began raiding local farms.
Many soldiers on garrison duty began committing crimes against civilians such as robbery, rape and
murder in order to cure their boredom. This crime wave resulted in American soldiers murdering at
least 20 civilians during the first month of occupation. Taylor showed little concern with the crimes
his soldiers had been committing and made no attempt to discipline the soldiers responsible for
them. This led to public opinion turning against the American troops and resulted in many Mexicans
taking up arms and forming guerrilla bands which attacked patrols of U.S soldiers. The attacks
continued to get more prevalent especially after the Battle of Monterrey.[4]
During this time anti-catholic sentiment and racism fueled more attacks on civilians. It was estimated
that during this time US troops killed at least 100 civilians, with the majority of them being killed by
Col. John C. Hays' 1st Texas Mounted Volunteers. In response to the violence, Mexicans killed an
American soldier outside of Monterrey. American troops under the command of Capt. Mabry B.
"Mustang" Gray responded to the event by abducting and executing twenty-four unarmed Mexican
civilians.
In the coming months the boredom of occupation duties led to additional violence against civilians. In
November 1846, a detachment from the 1st Kentucky regiment murdered a young Mexican boy,
apparently for sport. Afterwards, Taylor again refused to bring charges against any of the soldiers
involved.
The most infamous group of soldiers during this time were the ones serving under Joseph Lane.
After Captain Samuel Hamilton Walker was killed in a skirmish there, Lane ordered his men to
avenge the dead Texas Ranger by sacking the town of Huamantla. The soldiers quickly became
drunk after raiding a liquor store and began targeting the townspeople. Reports described the
soldiers raping scores of women many of whom were young girls and murdering dozens of Mexican
civilians while they burned down homes.[5] However, these reports of an American rampage were
overshadowed by news of Mexican General Antonio López de Santa Anna's resignation after the
Huamantla attack, leading to no repercussions against Lane or any of the soldiers involved in the
massacre.[6]
By the end of the war the number of Mexican civilians killed by American troops was estimated at
being over 10,000.[7]

Philippine–American War[edit]
Filipino casualties on the first day of war

General Jacob H. Smith's infamous order "Kill Everyone Over Ten" was the caption in the New York
Journal cartoon on May 5, 1902. The Old Glory draped an American shield on which a vulture replaced the
bald eagle. The caption at the bottom proclaimed, "Criminals Because They Were Born Ten Years Before We
Took the Philippines"

Following the end of the Spanish–American War in 1898, Spain ceded the Philippines to the United
States as part of the peace settlement. This triggered a more than decade-long conflict between
the United States Armed Forces and the First Philippine Republic under President Emilio Aguinaldo.
Execution of Moros illustrated on a 1911 commemorative postcard

War crimes committed by the United States Army include the March across Samar, which led to the
court martial and forcible retirement of Brigadier General Jacob H. Smith.[2]
Smith instructed Major Littleton Waller, commanding officer of a battalion of 315 U.S.
Marines assigned to bolster his forces in Samar, regarding the conduct of pacification:
"I want no prisoners. I wish you to kill and burn, the more you kill and burn the better it will please
me. I want all persons killed who are capable of bearing arms in actual hostilities against the United
States," General Jacob H. Smith said.
Since it was a popular belief among the Americans serving in the Philippines that native males were
born with bolos in their hands, Major Littleton "Tony" Waller asked, "I would like to know the limit of
age to respect, sir."
"Ten years", Smith said.
"Persons of ten years and older are those designated as being capable of bearing arms?"
"Yes." Smith confirmed his instructions a second time.[8][9][10]

A sustained and widespread massacre of Filipino civilians followed. Food and trade to Samar were
cut off, intended to starve the revolutionaries into submission. Smith's strategy on Samar involved
widespread destruction to force the inhabitants to stop supporting the guerrillas and turn to the
Americans from fear and starvation. He used his troops in sweeps of the interior in search for
guerrilla bands and in attempts to capture Philippine General Vicente Lukbán, but he did nothing to
prevent contact between the guerrillas and the townspeople. American columns marched across the
island, destroying homes and shooting people and draft animals.
The exact number of Filipino civilians killed by US troops will never be known. Littleton Waller, in a
report, stated that over an eleven-day period his men burned 255 dwellings, shot 13 carabaos and
killed 39 people.[11] An exhaustive research made by a British writer in the 1990s put the figure at
about 2,500 dead; Filipino historians believe it to be around 50,000.[12] As a consequence of his order
in Samar, Smith became known as "Howling Wilderness Smith".[13]
Moro crater massacre

Regarding the massacres in Bud Dajo, Major Hugh Scott, the District Governor of Sulu Province,
where the incidents occurred, recounted that those who fled to the crater "declared they had no
intention of fighting, - ran up there only in fright, [and] had some crops planted and desired to
cultivate them."[14]
The description of the engagement as a "battle" is disputed because of both the overwhelming
firepower of the attackers and the lopsided casualties. The author Vic Hurley wrote, "By no stretch of
the imagination could Bud Dajo be termed a 'battle'".[15] Mark Twain condemned the incident strongly
in articles[16][17] and commented, "In what way was it a battle? It has no resemblance to a battle ... We
cleaned up our four days' work and made it complete by butchering these helpless people."[18] A
higher percentage of Moros were killed than in other incidents now considered massacres. For
example, the highest estimate of Native Americans killed at the Wounded Knee Massacre is 300 out
of 350 (a death rate of 85 percent), whereas in Bud Dajo there were only six Moro survivors out of a
group estimated at 1,000 (a death rate of over 99 percent). As at Wounded Knee, the Moro group
included women and children. Moro men in the crater who had arms possessed melee weapons.
While fighting was limited to ground action on Jolo, use of naval gunfire contributed significantly to
the overwhelming firepower brought to bear against the Moros.
During the engagement, 750 men and officers, under the command of Colonel J.W. Duncan,
assaulted the volcanic crater of Bud Dajo (Tausūg: Būd Dahu), which was populated by 800 to
1,000 Tausug villagers.
On March 2, 1906, Wood ordered Colonel J.W. Duncan of the 6th Infantry Regiment (stationed
at Zamboanga, the provincial capital) to lead an expedition against Bud Dajo. The assault force
consisted of "272 men of the 6th Infantry, 211 [dismounted] men of the 4th Cavalry, 68 men of the
28th Artillery Battery, 51 Philippine Constabulary, 110 men of the 19th Infantry and 6 sailors from the
gunboat Pampanga."[19] The battle began on March 5, as mountain guns fired 40 rounds
of shrapnelinto the crater.[19] During the night, the Americans hauled mountain guns to the crater's
edge with block and tackle. At daybreak, the American guns (both the mountain guns and the guns
of the Pampanga) opened up on the Moros' fortifications in the crater. American forces then placed a
"Machine Gun... in position where it could sweep the crest of the mountain between us and the
cotta," killing all Moros in the crater.[20] One account claims that the Moros, armed with krises and
spears, refused to surrender and held their positions. Some of the defenders rushed the Americans
and were cut down. The Americans charged the surviving Moros with fixed bayonets, and the Moros
fought back with their kalis, barung, improvised grenades made with black powder and
seashells.[19] Despite the inconsistencies among various accounts of the battle (one in which all
occupants of Bud Dajo were gunned down, another in which defenders resisted in fierce hand-to-
hand combat), all accounts agree that few, if any, Moros survived.
In response to criticism, Wood's explanation of the high number of women and children killed stated
that the women of Bud Dajo dressed as men and joined in the combat, and that the men used
children as living shields.[21][22] Hagedorn supports this explanation, by giving an account of
Lt. Gordon Johnston, who was severely wounded by a woman warrior.[23] A second explanation was
given by the Governor-General of the Philippines, Henry Clay Ide, who reported that the women and
children were collateral damage, having been killed during the artillery barrages.[21] These conflicting
explanations of the high number of women and child casualties brought accusations of a cover-up,
adding to the criticism.[21] Furthermore, Wood's and Ide's explanation are at odds with Col. J.W.
Duncan's March 12, 1906 post-action report describing the placement of a machine-gun at the edge
of the crater to fire upon the occupants.[20] Following Duncan's reports, the high number of non-
combatants killed can be explained as the result of indiscriminate machine-gun fire.
Despite President McKinley's proclamation of "benevolent assimilation" of the Philippines as a U.S.
Territory, American treatment of Philippine soldiers and civilians was far from benevolent.
General Elwell Stephen Otis controlled the flow of information by journalists, often through violent
methods, in order to maintain American support for the war. Following the Battle of Manila,
Aguinaldo switched his tactics from conventional warfare to guerrilla warfare, causing American
generals to establish harsher methods of warfare as well.
Orders given by Otis and General Arthur MacArthur Jr. oversaw the complete destruction of many
villages, and the capture and execution of their civilians, in order to incite conflict by Philippine
soldiers. Despite Otis' restriction on journalism, many reports by both American and Filipino
journalists indicate that American treatment of Filipino prisoners was very harsh, as many were
starved and tortured, and many others were executed.[24]
A report written by General J.M. Bell in 1901 states: "I am now assembling in the neighborhood of
2,500 men who will be used in columns of about fifty men each. I take so large a command for the
purpose of thoroughly searching each ravine, valley and mountain peak for insurgents and for food,
expecting to destroy everything I find outside of towns. All able bodied men will be killed or captured.
... These people need a thrashing to teach them some good common sense; and they should have it
for the good of all concerned."[25]

World War II[edit]


See also: United States war crimes during World War II
Pacific theater[edit]
On January 26, 1943, the submarine USS Wahoo fired on survivors in lifeboats from the Japanese
transport Buyo Maru. Vice Admiral Charles A. Lockwood asserted that the survivors were Japanese
soldiers who had turned machine-gun and rifle fire on the Wahoo after she surfaced, and that such
resistance was common in submarine warfare.[26] According to the submarine's executive officer, the
fire was intended to force the Japanese soldiers to abandon their boats and none of them were
deliberately targeted.[27] Historian Clay Blair stated that the submarine's crew fired first and the
shipwrecked survivors returned fire with handguns.[28] The survivors were later determined to have
included Allied POWs of the Indian 2nd Battalion, 16th Punjab Regiment, who were guarded by
Japanese Army Forces from the 26th Field Ordnance Depot.[29] Of 1,126 men originally aboard Buyo
Maru, 195 Indians and 87 Japanese died, some killed during the torpedoing of the ship and some
killed by the shootings afterwards.[30]
During and after the Battle of the Bismarck Sea (March 3–5, 1943), U.S. PT boats and Allied aircraft
attacked Japanese rescue vessels as well as approximately 1,000 survivors from eight sunken
Japanese troop transport ships.[31]The stated justification was that the Japanese personnel were
close to their military destination and would be promptly returned to service in the battle.[31] Many of
the Allied aircrew accepted the attacks as necessary, while others were sickened.[32]
American servicemen in the Pacific War sometimes deliberately killed Japanese soldiers who had
surrendered, according to Richard Aldrich, a professor of history at the University of Nottingham.
Aldrich published a study of diaries kept by United States and Australian soldiers, wherein it was
stated that they sometimes massacred prisoners of war.[33] According to John Dower, in "many
instances ... Japanese who did become prisoners were killed on the spot or en route to prison
compounds."[34] According to Professor Aldrich, it was common practice for U.S. troops not to take
prisoners.[35] His analysis is supported by British historian Niall Ferguson,[36] who also says that, in
1943, "a secret [U.S.] intelligence report noted that only the promise of ice cream and three days
leave would ... induce American troops not to kill surrendering Japanese."[37]
Ferguson states that such practices played a role in the ratio of Japanese prisoners to dead being
1:100 in late 1944. That same year, efforts were taken by Allied high commanders to suppress "take
no prisoners" attitudes[37]among their personnel (because it hampered intelligence gathering), and to
encourage Japanese soldiers to surrender. Ferguson adds that measures by Allied commanders to
improve the ratio of Japanese prisoners to Japanese dead resulted in it reaching 1:7, by mid-1945.
Nevertheless, "taking no prisoners" was still "standard practice" among U.S. troops at the Battle of
Okinawa, in April–June 1945.[38] Ferguson also suggests that "it was not only the fear of disciplinary
action or of dishonor that deterred German and Japanese soldiers from surrendering. More
important for most soldiers was the perception that prisoners would be killed by the enemy anyway,
and so one might as well fight on."[39]
Ulrich Straus, a U.S. Japanologist, suggests that Allied troops on the front line intensely hated
Japanese military personnel and were "not easily persuaded" to take or protect prisoners, because
they believed, reasonably, that Allied personnel who surrendered got "no mercy" from the
Japanese.[40] Allied troops were told that Japanese soldiers were inclined to feign surrender in order
to make surprise attacks,[40] a practice which was outlawed by the Hague Convention of
1907.[41] Therefore, according to Straus, "Senior officers opposed the taking of prisoners on the
grounds that it needlessly exposed American troops to risks ..."[40] When prisoners were taken at
Guadalcanal, Army interrogator Captain Burden noted that many times POWs were shot during
transport because "it was too much bother to take [them] in".[42]
U.S. historian James J. Weingartner attributes the very low number of Japanese in U.S. prisoner of
war compounds to two important factors, namely (1) a Japanese reluctance to surrender, and (2) a
widespread American "conviction that the Japanese were 'animals' or 'subhuman' and unworthy of
the normal treatment accorded to prisoners of war.[43] The latter reason is supported by Ferguson,
who says that "Allied troops often saw the Japanese in the same way that Germans regarded
Russians — as Untermenschen (i.e., "subhuman").[44]
Rape[edit]
Main article: Rape during the occupation of Japan
It has been claimed that some U.S. military personnel raped Okinawan women during the Battle of
Okinawa in 1945.[45]
Based on several years of research, Okinawan historian Oshiro Masayasu (former director of the
Okinawa Prefectural Historical Archives) writes:
Soon after the U.S. Marines landed, all the women of a village on Motobu Peninsula fell into the
hands of American soldiers. At the time, there were only women, children, and old people in the
village, as all the young men had been mobilized for the war. Soon after landing, the Marines
"mopped up" the entire village, but found no signs of Japanese forces. Taking advantage of the
situation, they started 'hunting for women' in broad daylight, and women who were hiding in the
village or nearby air raid shelters were dragged out one after another.[46]
According to interviews carried out by the New York Times and published by them in 2000, several
elderly people from an Okinawan village confessed that after the United States had won the Battle of
Okinawa, three armed marines kept coming to the village every week to force the villagers to gather
all the local women, who were then carried off into the hills and raped. The article goes deeper into
the matter and claims that the villagers' tale — true or not — is part of a "dark, long-kept secret" the
unraveling of which "refocused attention on what historians say is one of the most widely ignored
crimes of the war": 'the widespread rape of Okinawan women by American servicemen."[47]Although
Japanese reports of rape were largely ignored at the time, academic estimates have been that as
many as 10,000 Okinawan women may have been raped. It has been claimed that the rape was so
prevalent that most Okinawans over age 65 around the year 2000 either knew or had heard of a
woman who was raped in the aftermath of the war.[48]
Professor of East Asian Studies and expert on Okinawa, Steve Rabson, said: "I have read many
accounts of such rapes in Okinawan newspapers and books, but few people know about them or are
willing to talk about them."[48] He notes that plenty of old local books, diaries, articles and other
documents refer to rapes by American soldiers of various races and backgrounds. An explanation
given for why the US military has no record of any rapes is that few Okinawan women reported
abuse, mostly out of fear and embarrassment. According to an Okinawan police spokesman:
"Victimized women feel too ashamed to make it public."[48] Those who did report them are believed
by historians to have been ignored by the U.S. military police. Many people wondered why it never
came to light after the inevitable American-Japanese babies the many women must have given birth
to. In interviews, historians and Okinawan elders said that some of those Okinawan women who
were raped and did not commit suicide did give birth to biracial children, but that many of them were
immediately killed or left behind out of shame, disgust or fearful trauma. More often, however, rape
victims underwent crude abortions with the help of village midwives. A large scale effort to determine
the possible extent of these crimes has never been conducted. Over five decades after the war had
ended, in the late-1990s, the women who were believed to have been raped still overwhelmingly
refused to give public statements, instead speaking through relatives and a number of historians and
scholars.[48]
There is substantial evidence that the U.S. had at least some knowledge of what was going on.
Samuel Saxton, a retired captain, explained that the American veterans and witnesses may have
intentionally kept the rape a secret, largely out of shame: "It would be unfair for the public to get the
impression that we were all a bunch of rapists after we worked so hard to serve our
country."[48] Military officials formally denied the mass rapes, and all surviving related veterans
refused the New York Times request for an interview. Masaie Ishihara, a sociology professor,
supports this: "There is a lot of historical amnesia out there, many people don't want to acknowledge
what really happened."[48] Author George Feifer noted in his book Tennozan: The Battle of Okinawa
and the Atomic Bomb, that by 1946 there had been fewer than 10 reported cases of rape in
Okinawa. He explained it was "partly because of shame and disgrace, partly because Americans
were victors and occupiers. In all there were probably thousands of incidents, but the victims' silence
kept rape another dirty secret of the campaign."[49]
Some other authors have noted that Japanese civilians "were often surprised at the comparatively
humane treatment they received from the American enemy."[50][51] According to Islands of Discontent:
Okinawan Responses to Japanese and American Power by Mark Selden, the Americans "did not
pursue a policy of torture, rape, and murder of civilians as Japanese military officials had warned."[52]
There were also 1,336 reported rapes during the first 10 days of the occupation of Kanagawa
prefecture after the Japanese surrender.[45]
European theater[edit]
In the Laconia massacre, U.S. aircraft attacked Germans rescuing survivors from the sinking
British troopship in the Atlantic Ocean. Pilots of a United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) B-24
Liberator bomber, despite knowing the U-boat's location, intentions, and the presence of British
seamen, killed dozens of Laconia's survivors with bombs and strafing attacks, forcing U-156 to cast
its remaining survivors into the sea and crash dive to avoid being destroyed.
The "Canicattì massacre" involved the killing of Italian civilians by Lieutenant Colonel George
Herbert McCaffrey. A confidential inquiry was made, but McCaffrey was never charged with any
offense relating to the massacre. He died in 1954. This fact remained virtually unknown in the U.S.
until 2005, when Joseph S. Salemi of New York University, whose father witnessed it, reported it.[53]
In the "Biscari massacre", which consisted of two instances of mass murder, U.S. troops of the 45th
Infantry Division killed roughly 75 prisoners of war, mostly Italian.[54][55]
According to an article in Der Spiegel by Klaus Wiegrefe, many personal memoirs of Allied soldiers
have been wilfully ignored by historians until now because they were at odds with the "greatest
generation" mythology surrounding World War II. However, this has recently started to change, with
books such as The Day of Battle, by Rick Atkinson, in which he describes Allied war crimes in Italy,
and D-Day: The Battle for Normandy, by Antony Beevor.[56]Beevor's latest work suggests that Allied
war crimes in Normandy were much more extensive "than was previously realized".[57]
Historian Peter Lieb has found that many U.S. and Canadian units were ordered not to take enemy
prisoners during the D-Day landings in Normandy. If this view is correct, it may explain the fate of 64
German prisoners (out of the 130 captured) who did not make it to the POW collecting point
on Omaha Beach on the day of the landings.[56]
Near the French village of Audouville-la-Hubert, 30 Wehrmacht prisoners were massacred by
U.S. paratroopers.[57]
In the aftermath of the 1944 Malmedy massacre, in which 80 American POWs were murdered by
their German captors, a written order from the headquarters of the 328th U.S. Army Infantry
Regiment, dated 21 December 1944, stated: "No SS troops or paratroopers will be taken prisoner
but [rather they] will be shot on sight."[58] Major-General Raymond Hufft (U.S. Army) gave instructions
to his troops not to take prisoners when they crossed the Rhine in 1945. "After the war, when he
reflected on the war crimes he authorized, he admitted, 'if the Germans had won, I would have been
on trial at Nuremberg instead of them.'"[59] Stephen Ambrose related: "I've interviewed well over 1000
combat veterans. Only one of them said he shot a prisoner ... Perhaps as many as one-third of the
veterans...however, related incidents in which they saw other GIs shooting unarmed German
prisoners who had their hands up."[60]
"Operation Teardrop" involved eight surviving captured crewmen from the sunken German
submarine U-546 being tortured by U.S. military personnel. Historian Philip K. Lundeberg has written
that the beating and torture of U-546'ssurvivors was a singular atrocity motivated by the
interrogators' need to quickly get information on what the U.S. believed were potential missile
attacks on the continental U.S. by German submarines.[61]

SS concentration camp guards being executed at Dachau concentration camp on its day of liberation
(U.S. Army soldier photograph/National Archives)
The "Dachau massacre" involved the killing of German prisoners of war and surrendering SS
soldiers at the Dachau concentration camp.[62]
Among American WWII veterans who admitted to having committed war crimes was
former Mafia hitman Frank Sheeran. In interviews with his biographer Charles Brandt, Sheeran
recalled his war service with the Thunderbird Division as the time when he first developed a
callousness to the taking of human life. By his own admission, Sheeran participated in numerous
massacres and summary executions of German POWs, acts which violated the Hague Conventions
of 1899 and 1907 and the 1929 Geneva Convention on POWs. In his interviews with Brandt,
Sheeran divided such massacres into four different categories.
1. Revenge killings in the heat of battle. Sheeran told Brandt that, when a German soldier
had just killed his close friends and then tried to surrender, he would often "send him to hell,
too." He described often witnessing similar behavior by fellow GIs.[63]
2. Orders from unit commanders during a mission. When describing his first murder for
organized crime, Sheeran recalled: "It was just like when an officer would tell you to take a
couple of German prisoners back behind the line and for you to 'hurry back'. You did what
you had to do."[64]
3. The Dachau massacre and other reprisal killings of concentration camp guards and
trustee inmates.[65]
4. Calculated attempts to dehumanize and degrade German POWs. While Sheeran's unit
was climbing the Harz Mountains, they came upon a Wehrmacht mule train carrying food
and drink up the mountainside. The female cooks were first allowed to leave unmolested,
then Sheeran and his fellow GI's "ate what we wanted and soiled the rest with our waste."
Then the Wehrmacht mule drivers were given shovels and ordered to "dig their own shallow
graves." Sheeran later joked that they did so without complaint, likely hoping that he and his
buddies would change their minds. But the mule drivers were shot and buried in the holes
they had dug. Sheeran explained that by then, "I had no hesitation in doing what I had to
do."[66]
Rape[edit]
Main articles: Rape during the liberation of France and Rape during the occupation
of Germany
Secret wartime files made public only in 2006 reveal that American GIs committed
400 sexual offenses in Europe, including 126 rapes in England, between 1942 and
1945.[67] A study by Robert J. Lilly estimates that a total of 14,000 civilian women in
England, France and Germany were raped by American GIs during World War
II.[68][69] It is estimated that there were around 3,500 rapes by American servicemen in
France between June 1944 and the end of the war and one historian has claimed
that sexual violence against women in liberated France was common.[70]

Korean War[edit]
Main articles: No Gun Ri massacre and Sinchon massacre
No Gun Ri Massacre[edit]
The No Gun Ri massacre refers to an incident of mass killing of an undetermined
number of South Korean refugees by U.S. soldiers of the 7th Cavalry
Regiment (and in a U.S. air attack) between 26–29 July 1950 at a railroad bridge
near the village of Nogeun-ri, 100 miles (160 km) southeast of Seoul. In 2005,
the South Korean government certified the names of 163 dead or missing (mostly
women, children, and old men) and 55 wounded. It said that many other victims'
names were not reported.[71] Over the years survivors' estimates of the dead have
ranged from 300 to 500. This episode early in the Korean War gained widespread
attention when the Associated Press (AP) published a series of articles in 1999 that
subsequently won a Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting.[72]

Vietnam War[edit]
The Vietnam War Crimes Working Group Files is a collection of (formerly secret)
documents compiled by Pentagon investigators in the early 1970s, confirming
that atrocities by U.S. forces during the Vietnam War were more extensive than had
been officially acknowledged.[73][74] The documents are housed by the United
States National Archives and Records Administration, and detail 320 alleged
incidents that were substantiated by United States Armyinvestigators (not including
the 1968 My Lai Massacre). (See also Winter Soldier Investigation).
My Lai Massacre[edit]
Main article: My Lai Massacre

My Lai Massacre

The My Lai Massacre was the mass murder of 347 to 504 unarmed citizens in
South Vietnam, almost entirely civilians, most of them women and children,
conducted by U.S. soldiers from the Company C of the 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry
Regiment, 11th Brigade of the 23rd (Americal) Infantry Division, on 16 March 1968.
Some of the victims were raped, beaten, tortured, or maimed, and some of the
bodies were found mutilated. The massacre took place in the hamlets of Mỹ Lai and
My Khe of Sơn Mỹ village during the Vietnam War.[75][76] Of the 26 U.S. soldiers
initially charged with criminal offenses or war crimes for actions at My Lai,
only William Calley was convicted. Initially sentenced to life in prison, Calley had his
sentence reduced to ten years, then was released after only three and a half years
under house arrest. The incident prompted widespread outrage around the world,
and reduced U.S. domestic support for the Vietnam War. Three American
Servicemen (Hugh Thompson, Jr., Glenn Andreotta, and Lawrence Colburn), who
made an effort to halt the massacre and protect the wounded, were sharply
criticized by U.S. Congressmen, and received hate mail, death threats, and
mutilated animals on their doorsteps.[77] Thirty years after the event their efforts were
honored.[78]

Gulf War[edit]
At a 1992 symposium at Albany Law School, international law professor Francis
Boyle argued that the Coalition air campaign during the Gulf War fit the definition of
genocide due to alleged indiscriminate targeting of civilians and non-military
infrastructure.[79]
Highway of Death[edit]
Main article: Highway of Death
Highway of Death

During the American led coalition offensive in the Gulf War, American, Canadian,
British and French aircraft and ground forces attacked retreating Iraqi military
personnel and fleeing civilian convoys attempting to head towards Baghdad on the
night of February 26–27, 1991, resulting in the destruction of thousands of vehicles
and 200 to 1,000+ deaths.
Additionally, journalist Seymour Hersh, citing American witnesses, alleged that a
platoon of U.S. Bradley Fighting Vehicles from the 1st Brigade, 24th Infantry
Division opened fire on a large group of more than 350 disarmed Iraqi soldiers who
had surrendered at a makeshift military checkpoint after fleeing the devastation on
Highway 8.[80] Journalist Georgie Anne Geyer criticized Hersh's article, saying that
he offered "no real proof at all that such charges—which were aired, investigated
and then dismissed by the military after the war—are true."[81]

War on Terror[edit]
Main article: War on Terror
In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the U.S. Government adopted
several new measures in the classification and treatment of prisoners captured in
the War on Terror, including applying the status of unlawful combatant to some
prisoners, conducting extraordinary renditions, and using torture ("enhanced
interrogation techniques"). Human Rights Watch and others described the
measures as being illegal under the Geneva Conventions.[82]
Command responsibility[edit]
A presidential memorandum of February 7, 2002, authorized U.S. interrogators of
prisoners captured during the War in Afghanistan to deny the prisoners basic
protections required by the Geneva Conventions, and thus according to Jordan J.
Paust, professor of law and formerly a member of the faculty of the Judge Advocate
General's School, "necessarily authorized and ordered violations of the Geneva
Conventions, which are war crimes."[83] Based on the president's memorandum, U.S.
personnel carried out cruel and inhumane treatment on captured enemy
fighters,[84] which necessarily means that the president's memorandum was a plan to
violate the Geneva Convention, and such a plan constitutes a war crime under the
Geneva Conventions, according to Professor Paust.[85]
U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and others have argued that detainees
should be considered "unlawful combatants" and as such not be protected by the
Geneva Conventions in multiple memoranda regarding these perceived legal gray
areas.[86]
Gonzales' statement that denying coverage under the Geneva Conventions
"substantially reduces the threat of domestic criminal prosecution under the War
Crimes Act" suggests, to some authors, an awareness by those involved in crafting
policies in this area that U.S. officials are involved in acts that could be seen to
be war crimes.[87] The U.S. Supreme Court challenged the premise on which this
argument is based in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, in which it ruled that Common Article
Three of the Geneva Conventions applies to detainees in Guantanamo Bay and that
the military tribunals used to try these suspects were in violation of U.S. and
international law.[88]
Human Rights Watch claimed in 2005 that the principle of "command responsibility"
could make high-ranking officials within the Bush administration guilty of the
numerous war crimes committed during the War on Terror, either with their
knowledge or by persons under their control.[89] On April 14, 2006, Human Rights
Watch said that Secretary Donald Rumsfeld could be criminally liable for his alleged
involvement in the abuse of Mohammed al-Qahtani.[90] On November 14, 2006,
invoking universal jurisdiction, legal proceedings were started in Germany – for their
alleged involvement of prisoner abuse – against Donald Rumsfeld, Alberto
Gonzales, John Yoo, George Tenet and others.[91]
The Military Commissions Act of 2006 is seen by some as an amnesty law for
crimes committed in the War on Terror by retroactively rewriting the War Crimes
Act[92] and by abolishing habeas corpus, effectively making it impossible for
detainees to challenge crimes committed against them.[93]
Luis Moreno-Ocampo told The Sunday Telegraph in 2007 that he was willing to start
an inquiry by the International Criminal Court (ICC), and possibly a trial, for war
crimes committed in Iraq involving British Prime Minister Tony Blairand American
President George W. Bush.[94] Though under the Rome Statute, the ICC has no
jurisdiction over Bush, since the U.S. is not a State Party to the relevant treaty—
unless Bush were accused of crimes inside a State Party, or the UN Security
Council (where the U.S. has a veto) requested an investigation. However, Blair does
fall under ICC jurisdiction as Britain is a State Party.[95]
Shortly before the end of President Bush's second term in 2009, newsmedia in
countries other than the U.S. began publishing the views of those who believe that
under the United Nations Convention Against Torture, the U.S. is obligated to hold
those responsible for prisoner abuse to account under criminal law.[96] One
proponent of this view was the United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture and
other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (Professor Manfred
Nowak) who, on January 20, 2009, remarked on German television that former
president George W. Bush had lost his head of state immunity and under
international law the U.S. would now be mandated to start criminal
proceedings against all those involved in these violations of the UN Convention
Against Torture.[97] Law professor Dietmar Herz explained Nowak's comments by
opining that under U.S. and international law former President Bush is criminally
responsible for adopting torture as an interrogation tool.[97]

See also[edit]
General[edit]

 Command responsibility
 United States and the International Criminal Court
 American Service-Members' Protection Act
 Sexual assault in the United States military
 Torture and the United States
 Human rights in the United States
 United States and state-sponsored terrorism
 United States and state terrorism
World War II[edit]

 American mutilation of Japanese war dead


 Yumiko-chan incident
Vietnam War[edit]

 Operation Wheeler/Wallowa
 Vietnam War Crimes Working Group Files
 Operation Speedy Express
 Operation Menu
 Phoenix Program
 Tiger Force
 Russell Tribunal
War on Terror (2001–2006 period)[edit]

 Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture (December 2014 release)


 Enhanced interrogation techniques
Afghanistan[edit]

 Bagram torture and prisoner abuse


 Kandahar massacre
 Maywand District murders

US military video depicting the killing of over a dozen people including two Reuters news
staff in the Iraqi suburb of New Baghdad. The video was released 5th April 2010
by WikiLeaks.

Iraq War[edit]

 Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse


 Mahmudiyah killings
 Haditha killings
 John E. Hatley
 Hamdania incident
 The International Criminal Court and the 2003 invasion of Iraq

References[edit]
1. ^ FACT SHEET: United States Policy on the International Criminal Court This
article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of
the United States Department of State.
2. ^ United States and the International Criminal Court
3. ^ 148 CONG. REC. S3946 - THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION DECISION
TO UNSIGN THE ROME STATUTE This article incorporates public domain
material from websites or documents of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
4. ^ "From the Halls of Montezuma - LRC Blog LewRockwell.com". LewRockwell.com.
Retrieved 2018-02-10.
5. ^ Carney, Stephen A. (2005). The Occupation of Mexico, May 1846-July 1848.
Government Printing Office. ISBN 9780160873454.
6. ^ "The Occupation of Mexico, May 1846-July 1848". history.army.mil.
Retrieved 2018-02-10.
7. ^ 1946-, Clodfelter, Micheal (2017-04-24). Warfare and armed conflicts : a
statistical encyclopedia of casualty and other figures, 1492/2015 (Fourth ed.).
Jefferson, North Carolina. ISBN 9781476625850. OCLC 984342511.
8. ^ "President Retires Gen. Jacob H. Smith" (PDF). The New York Times. 1902-07-
17. Retrieved 2008-03-30.
9. ^ Melshen, Paul. "Littleton Waller Tazewell Waller". Archived from the original on 21
April 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-30.
10. ^ Miller, Stuart Creighton (1982). Benevolent Assimilation: The American Conquest
of the Philippines, 1899–1903. ISBN 9780300161939. Retrieved 2013-11-20.
11. ^ Nebrida, Victor. "The Balangiga Massacre: Getting Even". Archived from the
original on 2008-04-02. Retrieved 2008-03-29.
12. ^ Dumindin, Arnaldo. "Philippine-American War, 1899–1902". Retrieved 2008-03-
30.
13. ^ Karnow, Stanley. "Two Nations". Retrieved 2008-03-31.
14. ^ The statement from Scott comes from: Gedacht, Joshua. "Mohammedan Religion
Made It Necessary to Fire:" Massacres on the American Imperial Frontier from
South Dakota to the Southern Philippines". In Colonial Crucible: Empire in the
Making of the Modern American State. Edited by Alfred W. McCoy and Francisco A.
Scarano. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 2009, pp. 397-409.
Information on the use of craters as sites of refuge during Spanish attacks can be
found in: Warren, James Francis. The Sulu Zone, 1768-1898: The Dynamics of
External Trade, Slavery, and Ethnicity in the Transformation of a Southeast Asian
Maritime State, 2nd ed. Singapore: NUS Press, 2007.
15. ^ Hurley, Vic; Harris, Christopher L. (October 2010). Swish of the Kris, the Story of
the Moros. ISBN 9780615382425.
16. ^ Mark Twain (17 November 2013). Delphi Complete Works of Mark Twain
(Illustrated). Delphi Classics. p. 3819. ISBN 978-1-908909-12-1.
17. ^ Mark Twain (17 November 2013). Delphi Complete Works of Mark Twain
(Illustrated). Delphi Classics. pp. 3777–. ISBN 978-1-908909-12-1.
18. ^ Twain, Mark (2017-07-22). Comments on the Moro
Massacre. ISBN 9788026878148.
19. ^ Jump up to:a b c Cite error: The named referencebakbakan1 was
invoked but never defined (see the help page).
20. ^ Jump up to:a b Cite error: The named reference :0 was invoked
but never defined (see the help page).
21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Lane 1978, p. 129
22. ^ Jones, Gregg (2013). Honor in the Dust: Theodore Roosevelt, War in the
Philippines, and the Rise and Fall of America's Imperial Dream. New American
Library. pp. 353–354, 420. ISBN 978-0-451-23918-1.
23. ^ Cite
error: The named referencehagedorn1931p64 was
invoked but never defined (see the help page).
24. ^ [1]
25. ^ Lichauco and Storey, The Conquest of the Philippines by the United States, 1898-
1925, p. 120.
26. ^ Lockwood, Charles (1951). Sink 'em All. Bataam Books. ISBN 978-0-553-23919-
5.
27. ^ O'Kane, Richard (1987). Wahoo: The Patrols of America's Most Famous WWII
Submarine. Presidio Press. ISBN 978-0-89141-301-1.
28. ^ Blair, Clay (2001). Silent Victory. ISBN 978-1-55750-217-9.
29. ^ Holwitt 2005, p. 288; DeRose 2000, pp. 287–288.
30. ^ Holwitt 2005, p. 289; DeRose 2000, pp. 77, 94.
31. ^ Jump up to:a b Gillison, Douglas (1962). Royal Australian Air Force 1939–1942.
Canberra: Australian War Memorial.
32. ^ johnston, mark (2011). Whispering Death: Australian Airmen in the Pacific War.
Crows Nest, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-1-74175-901-3.
33. ^ Ben Fenton, "American troops 'murdered Japanese PoWs'" (Daily
Telegraph (UK), 06/08/2005), accessed 26/05/2007.
34. ^ John W. Dower, 1986, War Without Mercy, p.69.
35. ^ Ben Fenton, "American troops 'murdered Japanese PoWs'" (Daily
Telegraph (UK), 06/08/2005), accessed 26/05/2007
36. ^ Niall Ferguson, "Prisoner Taking and Prisoner Killing in the Age of Total War:
Towards a Political Economy of Military Defeat", War in History, 2004, 11 (2): 148–
192
37. ^ Jump up to:a b Niall Ferguson, "Prisoner Taking and Prisoner Killing in the Age of
Total War: Towards a Political Economy of Military Defeat", War in History, 2004,
11 (2): p.150
38. ^ Ferguson 2004, p.181
39. ^ Niall Ferguson, "Prisoner Taking and Prisoner Killing in the Age of Total War:
Towards a Political Economy of Military Defeat", War in History, 2004, 11 (2): p.176.
40. ^ Jump up to:a b c Ulrich Straus, The Anguish Of Surrender: Japanese POWs of
World War II (excerpts) (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2003 ISBN 978-0-
295-98336-3, p.116
41. ^ Laws of War: Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907
42. ^ Ulrich Straus, The Anguish Of Surrender: Japanese POWs of World War
II (excerpts) (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2003 ISBN 978-0-295-98336-
3, p.117
43. ^ James J. Weingartner, “Trophies of War: U.S. Troops and the Mutilation of
Japanese War Dead, 1941–1945” Pacific Historical Review (1992) p. 55
44. ^ Niall Ferguson, "Prisoner Taking and Prisoner Killing in the Age of Total War:
Towards a Political Economy of Military Defeat", War in History, 2004, 11 (2): p.182
45. ^ Jump up to:a b Schrijvers, Peter (2002). The GI War Against Japan. New York:
New York University Press. p. 212. ISBN 978-0-8147-9816-4.
46. ^ Tanaka, Toshiyuki. Japan's Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution
During World War II, Routledge, 2003, p.111. ISBN 0-203-30275-3
47. ^ Sims, Calvin (1 June 2000). "3 Dead Marines and a Secret of Wartime
Okinawa". New York Times. Nago, Japan. Retrieved 6 April 2015. Still, the villagers'
tale of a dark, long-kept secret has refocused attention on what historians say is
one of the most widely ignored crimes of the war, the widespread rape of Okinawan
women by American servicemen.
48. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Sims, Calvin (1 June 2000). "3 Dead Marines and a Secret of
Wartime Okinawa". New York Times. Nago, Japan. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
49. ^ Feifer, George (1992). Tennozan: The Battle of Okinawa and the Atomic Bomb.
Michigan: Ticknor & Fields. ISBN 9780395599242.
50. ^ Molasky, Michael S. (1999). The American Occupation of Japan and Okinawa:
Literature and Memory. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-415-19194-4.
51. ^ Molasky, Michael S.; Rabson, Steve (2000). Southern Exposure: Modern
Japanese Literature from Okinawa. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-8248-2300-9.
52. ^ Sheehan, Susan D; Elizabeth, Laura; Selden, Hein Mark. "Islands of Discontent:
Okinawan Responses to Japanese and American Power": 18.
53. ^ Giovanni Bartolone, Le altre stragi: Le stragi alleate e tedesche nella Sicilia del
1943–1944
54. ^ Weingartner, James J. A Peculiar Crusadee: Willis M. Everett and the Malmedy
massacre, NYU Press, 2000, p. 118. ISBN 0-8147-9366-5
55. ^ James J. Weingartner, "Massacre at Biscari: Patton and an American War
Crime", Historian, Volume 52 Issue 1, Pages 24–39, 23 Aug 2007
56. ^ Jump up to:a b The Horror of D-Day: A New Openness to Discussing Allied War
Crimes in WWII, Spiegel Online, 05/04/2010, (part 2), accessed 2010-07-08
57. ^ Jump up to:a b The Horror of D-Day: A New Openness to Discussing Allied War
Crimes in WWII, Spiegel Online, 05/04/2010, (part 1), accessed 2010-07-08
58. ^ Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and international relations p.186
59. ^ Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and international relations p.189
60. ^ Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and international relations p.190
61. ^ Lundeberg, Philip K. (1994). "Operation Teardrop Revisited". In Runyan, Timothy
J.; Copes, Jan M (eds.). To Die Gallantly: The Battle of the Atlantic. Boulder:
Westview Press. ISBN 978-0-8133-8815-1., pp. 221–226; Blair, Clay (1998). Hitler's
U-Boat War. The Hunted, 1942–1945 (Modern Library ed.). New York: Random
House. ISBN 978-0-679-64033-2., p. 687.
62. ^ Albert Panebianco (ed). Dachau its liberation 57th Infantry Association, Felix L.
Sparks, Secretary 15 June 1989. (backup site)
63. ^ Brandt (2004), , I Heard You Paint Houses, p. 50
64. ^ Brandt (2004), p. 84.
65. ^ Brandt (2004), p. 52.
66. ^ Brandt (2004), p. 51.
67. ^ David Wilson (27 March 2007). "The secret war". The Guardian. London.
Retrieved 22 November 2008.
68. ^ Lilly, Robert J. (2007). Taken by Force: Rape and American GIs in Europe During
World War II. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-50647-3.
69. ^ Morrow, John H. (October 2008). "Taken by Force: Rape and American GIs in
Europe during World War II By J. Robert Lilly". The Journal of Military
History. 72 (4): 1324. doi:10.1353/jmh.0.0151.
70. ^ Schofield, Hugh (5 June 2009). "Revisionists challenge D-Day story". BBC News.
Retrieved 6 January 2010.
71. ^ Committee for the Review and Restoration of Honor for the No Gun Ri Victims
(2009). No Gun Ri Incident Victim Review Report. Seoul: Government of the
Republic of Korea. pp. 247–249, 328, 278. ISBN 978-89-957925-1-3.
72. ^ "War's hidden chapter: Ex-GIs tell of killing Korean refugees". The Associated
Press. September 29, 1999.
73. ^ Kill Anything That Moves : U.s. War Crimes And Atrocities In Vietnam, 1965-
1973[permanent dead link], a doctoral dissertation, by Nick Turse, Columbia University 2005
74. ^ Nick Turse, “A My Lai a Month: How the US Fought the Vietnam War”, The Asia-
Pacific Journal, Vol. 47-6-08, November 21, 2008
75. ^ Summary report from the report of General PeersArchived 2000-01-25 at
the Wayback Machine.
76. ^ Department of the Army. Report of the Department of the Army Review of the
Preliminary Investigations into the My Lai Incident (The Peers
Report Archived 2008-11-15 at the Wayback Machine), Volumes I-III (1970).
77. ^ "Moral Courage In Combat: The My Lai Story" (PDF). USNA Lecture. 2003.
78. ^ My Lai Pilot Hugh Thompson
79. ^ Monday; December 2018, 3; Boyle, 10:55 am Article: Prof Francis A. "United
States War Crimes During the First Persian Gulf War | Scoop
News". www.scoop.co.nz. Retrieved 2019-02-04.
80. ^ JENSEN, ROBERT (2000-05-22). "The Gulf War Brought Out the Worst in
Us". Los Angeles Times. ISSN 0458-3035. Retrieved 2019-02-04.
81. ^ Georgie Anne Geyer, Seymour Hersh's Gulf War Misconceptions, Universal
Press Syndicate, May 19, 2000
82. ^ Prisoner abuse
 Command's Responsibility: Detainee Deaths in U.S. Custody in Iraq and
Afghanistan Archived October 2, 2006, at the Wayback Machine by Human
Rights First
 Command Responsibility? Archived 2009-09-10 at the Wayback Machine by
Jeremy Brecher and Brendan Smith,Published by Foreign Policy In
Focus (FPIF), a joint project of the International Relations Center (IRC, online
at www.irc-online.org) and the Institute for Policy Studies(IPS, online at
www.ips-dc.org), January 10, 2006
 Abu Ghraib is a Command Responsibility By Ray McGovern Former CIA
analyst, CounterPunch, October 1 / 2, 2005
83. ^ Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43:811, Jordan J. Paust, 2005 May 20,
p. 828 "Executive Plans and Authorizations to Violate International Law Concerning
Treatment and Interrogation of
Detainees, http://www.columbia.edu/cu/jtl/Vol_43_3_files/Paust.pdfArchived 2006-
09-21 at the Wayback Machine
84. ^ Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43:811, Jordan J. Paust, 2005 May 20,
p. 845 "Executive Plans and Authorizations to Violate International Law Concerning
Treatment and Interrogation of
Detainees, http://www.columbia.edu/cu/jtl/Vol_43_3_files/Paust.pdfArchived 2006-
09-21 at the Wayback Machine
85. ^ Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43:811, Jordan J. Paust, 2005 May 20,
p. 861 "Executive Plans and Authorizations to Violate International Law Concerning
Treatment and Interrogation of
Detainees, http://www.columbia.edu/cu/jtl/Vol_43_3_files/Paust.pdfArchived 2006-
09-21 at the Wayback Machine
86. ^ Parsing pain Archived March 7, 2008, at the Wayback Machine By Walter
Shapiro, Salon
87. ^ War Crimes warnings
 Torture and Accountability by Elizabeth Holtzman article in The Nation posted
June 28, 2005 (July 18, 2005 issue) about The Geneva Convention
 Former NY Congress member Holtzman Calls For President Bush and His
Senior Staff To Be Held Accountable for Abu Ghraib Torture Archived 2007-11-
14 at the Wayback Machine Thursday, June 30, 2005 on Democracy Now
 Memos Reveal War Crimes Warnings By Michael Isikoff Newsweek May 19,
2004
 US Lawyers Warn Bush on War Crimes Global Policy Forum January 28, 2003
88. ^ The Gitmo Fallout: The fight over the Hamdan ruling heats up—as fears about its
reach escalate. Archived May 12, 2007, at the Wayback Machine By Michael Isikoff
and Stuart Taylor Jr., Newsweek, July 17, 2006
89. ^ Getting Away with Torture? Command Responsibility for the U.S. Abuse of
Detainees Human Rights Watch, April 2005 Vol. 17, No. 1
90. ^ U.S.: Rumsfeld Potentially Liable for Torture Defense Secretary Allegedly
Involved in Abusive InterrogationHuman Rights Watch, April 14, 2006
91. ^ Universal jurisdiction
 Charges Sought Against Rumsfeld Over Prison AbuseBy ADAM ZAGORIN,
Time
 War Crimes Suit Prepared against RumsfeldArchived 2007-11-14 at
the Wayback MachineDemocracy Now, November 9th, 2006
 War Criminals, Beware Archived 2006-11-20 at the Wayback Machine by
Jeremy Brecher and Brendan Smith, The Nation, November 3, 2006
92. ^ Pushing Back on Detainee Act by Michael Ratner is president of the Center for
Constitutional Rights, The Nation, October 4, 2006
93. ^ Military Commissions Act of 2006
 Why The Military Commissions Act is No Moderate Compromise By MICHAEL
C. DORF, FindLaw, Oct. 11, 2006
 The CIA, the MCA, and Detainee Abuse By JOANNE MARINER, FindLaw,
November 8, 2006
 Europe's Investigations of the CIA's Crimes By JOANNE MARINER, FindLaw,
February 20, 2007
 Nat Hentoff (December 8, 2006). "Bush's War Crimes Cover-up". Village Voice.
Archived from the originalon August 13, 2009. Retrieved April 2, 2007.
94. ^ Court 'can envisage' Blair prosecution By Gethin Chamberlain, Sunday
Telegraph, March 17, 2007
95. ^ Coalition for the International Criminal Court, 18 July 2008. "States Parties to the
Rome Statute of the ICC" (PDF).. Accessed 12 November 2010.
96. ^ Other countries may start prosewcution
 Overseas, Expectations Build for Torture ProsecutionsBy Scott Horton, No
Comment, January 19, 2009
 Die leere Anklagebank – Heikles juristisches Erbe: Der künftige US-Präsident
Barack Obama muss über eine Strafverfolgung seiner Vorgänger entscheiden.
Mögliche Angeklagte sind George W. Bush und Donald
Rumsfeld. Archived 2009-02-25 at the Wayback Machine

Von Wolfgang Kaleck Süddeutschen Zeitung, January 19, 2009 (German)

97. ^ Jump up to:a b Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment calls for prosecution
 UN torture investigator calls on Obama to charge Bush for Guantanamo
abuses Ximena Marinero, JURIST, January 21, 2009
 UN Rapporteur: Initiate criminal proceedings against Bush and Rumsfeld
now By Scott Horton, No Comment, January 21, 2009

Further reading[edit]
General[edit]

 Jeremy Brecher; Jill Cutler; Brendan Smith, eds. (2005). In the name of democracy:
American war crimes in Iraq and beyond. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-8050-7969-2.
 Michael Haas (2008). George W. Bush, war criminal?: the Bush administration's liability
for 269 war crimes. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-313-36499-0.
 Jordan J. Paust (2007). Beyond the law: the Bush Administration's unlawful responses
in the "War" on Terror. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-71120-3.
 Mark Selden; Alvin Y. So, eds. (2004). War and state terrorism: the United States,
Japan, and the Asia-Pacific in the long twentieth century. Rowman &
Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-2391-3.
 Frederick Henry Gareau (2004). State terrorism and the United States: from
counterinsurgency to the war on terrorism. Zed Books. ISBN 978-1-84277-535-6.
 Vincent Bugliosi (2008). The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder.
Vanguard. ISBN 978-1-59315-481-3.
 "Leave No Marks: Enhanced Interrogation Techniques and the Risk of
Criminality" (PDF). Physicians for Human Rights / Human Rights First. August 2007.

By nation[edit]
Iraq

 Richard A. Falk; Irene L. Gendzier; Robert Jay Lifton, eds. (2006). Crimes of war: Iraq.
Nation Books. ISBN 978-1-56025-803-2.
 Ramsey Clark (1992). War crimes: a report on United States war crimes against Iraq.
Maisonneuve Press. ISBN 978-0-944624-15-9.
 Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed (2003). Behind the war on terror: western secret strategy and
the struggle for Iraq. New Society Publishers. ISBN 978-0-86571-506-6.
 Marjorie Cohn (November 9, 2006). "Donald Rumsfeld: The War Crimes Case". The
Jurist.
 Ulrike Demmer (2007-03-26). "Wanted For War Crimes: Rumsfeld Lawsuit Embarrasses
German Authorities". Der Spiegel.
 Patrick Donahue (2007-04-27). "German Prosecutor Won't Set Rumsfeld Probe
Following Complaint". Bloomberg L.P.
Vietnam

 Greiner, Bernd; Anne Wyburd (2009). War Without Fronts: The USA in Vietnam. New
Haven, Conn: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-15451-1.
 Deborah Nelson (2008). The war behind me: Vietnam veterans confront the truth about
U.S. war crimes. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-00527-7.
 Nick Turse (2013). Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam. New
York: Metropolitan Books. ISBN 978-0-8050-8691-1.