THESIS PDD EVALUATION SHEET

Name of Student Grade

Project Title

Location

QUALITY OF WORK (65%) (%) Needs

Excellent Very Good Good Improve- Poor Tally
ment
Design Concept
Successful translation of Problem 10 9.5 9.0 8.5 7.5 7.0
Statement and Project Objectives
into the Design Concept
Site Development Plan
Achieved efficient circulation, zoning. 20 19 18 17 15 14
Application of Design Concept
Floor Plans
Soundness of design solution with 30 28.5 27 25.5 22.5 21
efficient circulation, zoning and the
successful translation of the concept
Elevations & Sections
Cohesiveness of forms; Innovative 20 19 18 17 15 14
and effective interpretation of design
concept.
Architectural Bay Section & Details
Innovative and appropriate design 10 9.5 9.0 8.5 7.5 7.0
solutions
Perspectives
Competent translation and creative 10 9.5 9.0 8.5 7.5 7.0
rendering.
SUB TOTAL

Needs
COMPLETENESS OF WORK (15%) (%) Excellent Very Good Good Improve- Poor Tally
ment

Complete drawing requirements 60 57 54 51 45 42

Properly labelled drawings 40 38 36 34 30 28

SUB TOTAL

Needs
(%) Excellent Very Good Good Improve- Poor Tally
PRESENTATION (20%) ment

Clear, organized and structured 35 33.25 31.5 29.75 26.25 24.5

delivery of Presentation

Shows confidence, preparedness and 25 23.75 22.5 21.25 18.75 17.5

understanding of the project
Creative Presentation Techniques,
use of graphical presentation to 40 38 36 34 30 28
emphasize concept
SUB TOTAL

Sub PANELIST
Total (%)
SUMMARY

Quality of Work 65%

Completeness of Work 15%

Presentation 20%
TOTAL Name & Signature