Está en la página 1de 9

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 59, No. 17, pp.

3525-3533, 1995
Pergamon Copyright © 1995 Elsevier Science Ltd
Printed in the USA. All rights reserved
0016-7037/95 $9.50 + .00

0016-7037( 95 ) 00229-4

Mechanisms of sulfate removal from subsurface calcium chloride brines:


Heletz-Kokhav oilfields, Israel
ITTAI GAVRIEL1, ~ AVRAHAM STARINSKY, 2 BARUCH SPIRO, 3 ZEEV AIZENSHTAT, 4 and HEIMO NIELSEN 5
~GeologicalSurvey of Israel, 30 Malkhe Street, Jerusalem 95501, Israel
~-Departmentof Geology, Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
3NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory, Keyworth, NottinghamshireNGI2 5GG, UK
4School of Applied Sciences, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
5Stable Isotope Laboratory, Geochemical Institute, University of Gtttingen, Gtttingen, Germany

(Received July 26, 1994; accepted in revisedform May 28, 1995)

Abstract--The evolution of the Ca-chloride brines in the Heletz Formation, Lower Cretaceous, in the
southern coastal plain of Israel was reconstructed through the study of its sulfate concentration and isotopic
composition. Particular emphasis was given to the brine-oil interaction in the oilfields and to the sulfate
depletion and lower 5 0 4 / C 1 ratio in brines in contact with hydrocarbons (oil brines) relative to "oil-free"
from dry wells in the same oilfields.
A method is presented for a calculation of the amount of sulfate removed from the original seawater in
the various stages of its evolution to Ca-chloride brine. These stages include evaporation, dolomitization,
and sulfate reduction in different stages of its evolution, from early diagenetic processes to the contact with
crude oil. In the present study, based on the ~345so 4 and SO4/C1 ratio, it was found that in the Heletz brines
most of the sulfate ( 8 0 - 9 4 % ) was removed from the original seawater prior to their interaction with the
hydrocarbons and only a negligible fraction of few percent of the sulfate was removed during the crude
oil-water contact.
The Ca-chloride brines evolved from Messinian (Upper Miocene) seawater that underwent evaporation
during the desiccation of the Mediterranean. Sulfate was removed from Messinian lagoon(s) during gyp-
sum precipitation due to evaporation and dolomitization. Bacterial sulfate reduction further depleted the
brine in sulfate and changed its isotopic composition, from its original Miocene seawater composition of
634Sso, ~ 20%o, to 26%0. Overall, some 50% of the original sulfate, as normalized to chloride, was removed
from the original lagoon through the above processes, mostly by gypsum precipitation. Eastward migration
of the Messinian Ca-Chloride brine into the Heletz Formation was accompanied by dolomitization of the
country rock.
Final depletion of sulfate from the brines took place, and possibly still occurs, in the presence of
crude oil in the oilfields. The two oil-producing fields, Heletz and Kokhav, occupy different areas on
a Rayleigh distillation diagram. Sulfate depletion in both fields is accompanied by an increase in
~345SO4, which reaches a maximum value of 59%0. The above correlation is explained by bacterial
sulfate reduction facilitated by the contact with the crude. Samples collected from the same boreholes
at time intervals of several months show two opposing trends: sulfate concentration decrease accom-
panied by increase in 634Sso,, and vice versa. While the first can be explained as in situ bacterial sul-
fate reduction, the latter attest to subsurface brine migration, as would be expected in oil-producing
fields.

1. INTRODUCTION pertains to the mechanism of Ca-chloride evolution from


seawater.
Subsurface aqueous fluids associated with crude oil and At the beginning of the century it was already noted that
gas pools belong mostly, according to their chemical com- the "chemical analysis of waters associated with oil differ
position, to the group of Ca-chloride brines, which make widely from the composition of seawater." "The first notice-
up the bulk of the deep waters in sedimentary basins. able difference is the general absence of sulfates from oilfield
These brines are defined by their ionic equivalent ratios waters, but this has been explained satisfactorily through the
of Na/C1 < 1 and (C1-Na)/Mg > 1 (Sulin, 1946), im- reduction of hydrocarbons and organic matter" (Washburne,
plying that at least part of the chloride is balanced by Ca. 1914). The concentrations of SO4 in Ca-chloride brines, ei-
The above relationship may also be defined as Ca/(SO4 ther associated with oil or not, is in the range of few tens to
+ HCO3) > 1, thereby emphasizing the relative depletion few hundreds mg/L, whereas their salinity ranges between
of these brines in sulfate and bicarbonate (Lerman, 1970; few tens to several hundreds g/L. It is widely accepted that
Starinsky, 1974; Hardie, 1990). Several well-established SOn depletion and low SO4/C1 ratio in seawater-derived Ca-
mechanisms for the evolution of Ca-chloride brines have chloride brines has been caused by the following mechanisms:
been identified, including evaporation, water-rock inter- (1) biological or chemical reduction or (2) precipitation of
action, albitization, hydrothermal activities, membrane gypsum as a result of either dolomitization or extensive evap-
filtration, and freezing (Carpenter, 1978; Hardie, 1990; oration, or both (Levorsen, 1958; Starinsky, 1974; Collins,
Land, 1992; Herut et al., 1990; Hanor, 1994). This study 1975; Carpenter, 1978; Hanor, 1988). However, the condi-
3525
3526 I. Gavrieli et al.

tions under which either of these processes took place and the in the area during the Messinian (Upper Miocene) when the
relative extent of SO4 depletion resulting from these different Mediterranean sea underwent nearly complete desiccation
processes, including the sulfate reduction in the presence of (Hsu, 1972). Along the Israeli coastal plain this desiccation
hydrocarbons, have not yet been clarified. is expressed by the Mavqiim Formation (Fig. 2), which is
In the present study, a method is presented, based on the composed mainly of anhydrite, dolomite, and clastics (Derin
634Sso4 and S O J C 1 ratio, for a calculation of the amount of and Reiss, 1973 ). Some of the evaporated brines were trapped
sulfate removed from the original seawater in the various as interstitial waters in the sediments of the Mavqiim For-
stages of its evolution. The geochemical and sulfur isotopic mation. In the present study these brines are represented by
evolution of the brines in the Heletz Formation (Lower Cre- the Gaza-I Mavqiim brine. Other brines migrated eastward in
taceous), in the southern part of the Israeli Coastal Plain, will the subsurface along a front of 50 km on the coastal plain of
be reconstructed. Four oilfields, Heletz, Kokhav, Brur, and Israel, which includes the oilfields in the study area, and were
Negba (Fig. 1 ), two of which (Heletz and Kokhav) still pro- diluted to various degrees by subsurface freshwater (F'leischer
duce some crude oil from five to six wells, were considered. et al., 1977; Starinsky et al., 1983).
Oil is produced mainly from Lower Cretaceous sandstones The source rock for the Heletz oil is either the Lower Cre-
and to a lesser extent from dolomites, from depths ranging taceous shales of the Gevar-Am Formation (Grader, 1960,
from 1.5 to 2.0 km. A distinction is made here between brines Amit, 1978) or the Jurassic fine-grained carbonates of the
associated with oil (oil brines) and brines pumped from dry Barnea Formation (Bein and Sofer, 1987). It appears that the
holes (oil-free brines). The water content in most of the oil migrated into its present reservoirs during the Neogene
pumped brine-oil mixture increased with production and at following major tectonic movements (Cohen, 1971; Gilboa
present most of the still active wells have water content above et al., 1990).
90%. Most of the brines discussed in the present study were
sampled during the late 1950s to early 1960s, while the oil- 2. METHODS
fields were developed. A few were sampled in the seventies
(Table 1 ). An additional brine was taken from Saad-1 bore- Most brines discussed in the present study were sampled during
hole, a few km due south from the oilfields (Fig. 1 ), and is oil pumping tests (DST and swabs) at the time of drilling performed
in the late 1950s to the 1970s. Potential reservoirs or entire wells that
regarded as representative of the oil-free brines in the Heletz proved to be dry of hydrocarbons were either abandoned and/or test-
Formation. ing was performed at a different depth. Thus, dry wells or nonproduc-
Geological and geochemical considerations suggest that the ing reservoirs within oil-producing wells could not be resampled.
brines now present in the Heletz Formation were derived Samples were also collected from oil-producing wells, the depth of
sampling being determined by the reservoir being exploited.
from evaporated seawater (Bentor, 1969; Starinsky, 1974; Brines were separated from the crude oil in the field by gravita-
Fleischer et al., 1977; Starinsky et al., 1983; Calvo, 1993; tional settling immediately after sampling. All samples were filtered
Vengosh et al., 1994). Such saline marginal lagoons existed prior to analysis. The chemical analyses were carried out by the Me-

ii//// SHE~'
Ii

FIG. 1. Location map.


Sulfate removal from subsurface brines 3527

Table 1. Geological and chemical data (mg/1) of the oil field brines.

lil/iiNNi|i
r¢,~,~u m n ~ mu-~.cmm~ ~ U ~ l~--~m urn'ram m u ~ i l ~ ¥ ~

~ ~ i-mr~lm ~ ~ U l~.~mm l ~ Z . m nr~'~nm n'w-~m l t ~


.,-e~,,iulm ~ mu-~--telm~ ~ U il~:n mm~nm m.-t!~nnnm,L,a-,~amunm~-.~n
~ ~ mu-~.~mm~ i U mmw'~m l ~ a n m.r;~m m u~-~ml ~ W
..e.~.~umm~ i-~-~-.mm ~ ~ U 1¥~'-¢1 nr'~am nm~.~n m ~ m l r ~ - ~
..-~.~Fe~um n ~ im~mi ~ ~ U ~ ~l~'r~n l ~ - r . m i ' . ~ l l~r~'a

..-emnrmmnmmn~lnn mu~--~amn~ mrnn U ~ l~m mt, r.......~mi u ~ m n l m ~


.,-~,~nn'lm ~ mu~-~Wl ~ nu,~n~ln U mu~n~i m~-.m l~-m l-~-m lm~
12 4.51 0.91 1.97
67 0.22 0.86 1.27
247 0.69 0.81 1.52
128 1.51 0.92 2.30
79 0.74 0.87 2.19
238 0.36 0.87 1.24
.mer.~:mn ~ nu~-~,mm~ ~ U ir.~nm n~'~n ~ Harem ~ 195 0.86 0.88 2.77
226 0.71 0.89 1.52
165 5.86 0.86 1.63
229 1.37 0.86 1.63
273 0.94 0.78 2.88
~ m~n~.~in nu-~-mn nuu ~ - ~ l n j U n'r.~n ~ l~'~l i'.~l m~,'~. 1.55 0.80 1.47
..e~.n~'lm ~ nu-~nlm ~ m U ~ mw~-I i"~"~l n ~ mm~ 217 2.27 0.89 1.21
n.~,e~z ~ n / mr~-~mm ~ m~.nt,~.~lU m.~r.......~mnm-.rm m ~ m ~ ~ 146 18.55 0.86 2.25
18.96 0.82 2.46
146 12.40 0.82 2.27
.,~,v~V~ulm~ mu~--~,~mm~ j U ~ l z : ~ n n m - . ~ - i m - r , ~ l m~-.~z,,~ 172 4.99 0.89 1.34
..e~mmm ~ nun-mini ~ j U n v n ~ i mm~mm1 , ~ ' l i r~.~um~ 299 1.42 0.83 2.35
678 15.28 0.78 2.22
144 8.11 0.80 1.48
127 167 7.51 0.93 0.90
,w~m ~ m~mm ~ ~ U m~m m~m ma~m ma~m m ~ 166 364 9.55 0.75 1.15
19 500 1.07 0.87 1.48
21 719 0.96 0.89 1.18
576 204 19.96 0.85 1.10
86 220 1.70 0.84 1.85
117 695 5.57 0.87 1.65
1058 488 37.10 0.82 2.38
132 500 6.78 0.87 1.85
7 445 0.32 0.88 1.49
483 17.61 0.83 1.58
32 88 0.66 0.84 1.52
394 155 14.22 0.90 1.39
551 366 13.40 0.83 2.57
76 437 3.31 0.82 1.78
80 1253 4.01 0.88 1.53
981 212 46.27 0.87 1.68
890 457 43.31 0.90 2.70
1470 295 39.73 0.82 4.60
2114 53.64 0.87 2.76

luu /nil lUilmiB


a." +: oil brine, - : oil-free brine
b." weight ratio.
c: molar ratio.
sst: sandstone, lst: limestone; dol: dolomite; gyp: gypsum

korot Water Co. Ltd. Most samples were analysed within few weeks tion error in the analyses of more than 95% of the samples is less
after sampling, few were analysed within several months. The brines than 3.2%. The lack of H2S odor when the bottles were reopened is
associated with oils on which sulfur isotope analyses were carried taken as an indicator that no reduction took place after sampling.
out were sampled in 1 9 7 9 - 1 9 8 0 from oil-producing wells. These A serious problem in brine sampling during oil production test-
samples were analysed and BaSO4 was precipitated from them in the ing is the reliability of the brine as representatives of the forma-
Geological Survey of Israel and the Department of Geology at the tion water, because the water at this stage are often contaminated
Hebrew University soon after sampling. by the drilling fluids, or m i x e d with other formation water. For
The full chemical analyses of the waters were carried out by the the Heletz Formation brines this problem has been addressed by
following methods: Na and K by atomic absorption ( A A ) or flame Starinsky ( 1 9 7 4 ) . The analyses presented in the study include
photometry; C a a n d Mg by EDTA or AA; and Chloride and bicar- only the most reliable samples, chosen from a m o n g several hun-
bonate by titration. Sulfate was analysed gravimetrically. The reac- dred samples taken mostly during oil p u m p i n g tests. Most of the
3528 I. Gavrieli et al.

I
-W- E
I---- Oil fields t
- .,~,*-'.'~I<urkor'.L.L-'~-~..'i~.~-. " . ~ ~ ~ .
oI ~ _ ~ _
"

, e " ." Juaea Grp. "


kml

t i

Cloy ~ Limestone ~ Dolomite ~ Gypsum


~ ] Petroleum [ ' ~ Mor, [ - ~ Chalk ~Sond

FIG. 2. Schematic west-east geological cross sections across the oilfields.

chemical analyses have been published previously (Bentor, 1969; from the two dry reference boreholes of Gaza-1 and Saad-1.
Starinsky, 1974; Fleischer et al., 1977; Starinsky et al., 1983). The 634Sso, of the oil brines cover a wide range between 33.8
Wells that were resampled were only oil producing wells in
and 59.0%0, while that of the two latter boreholes is 2 6 . 3 -
which the question of contamination by drilling fluid does not
exist. 26.4%~. Three oil-producing boreholes were sampled from the
Most sulfur isotopic analyses were carried out on samples collected same horizon more than once (Heletz 11, Heletz 35, and Kok-
during 1979-1980. For the sulfur isotopic analysis, the brines were hav 3). Whereas chloride concentrations in the consecutive
filtered and sulfate was precipitated from acidified brine samples as samples were constant within analytical error, the sulfate con-
BaSt4 using 5% BaC12 solution. The precipitate was filtered and
subsequently heated to 800°C to remove organic contaminants. The centrations and 634Sso 4 varied between 1 0 - 2 5 % and 4.5-7%~,
preparation of SO2 gas for mass spectrometric analysis followed the respectively (Tables 1, 2). The changes in sulfate concentra-
method of Coleman and Moore (1978). Mass spectrometric analyses tion ( a n d consequently SO4/C1 ratio) and 634Sso4 composition
were carried out on a Finnigan MAT 251 at the Gottingen Laboratory within each borehole were consistent, whereby increases in
and on a VG SIRA 10 at the NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory. sulfate concentration were accompanied by decreases in
Results are given as %0 deviation from the CDT standard with an
overall analytical precision of _0.2%0. 6345so4, or vice versa (Tables 1, 2).

3. RESULTS
4. DISCUSSION
The chemical compositions and some ionic ratios of fifty-
one brine samples from thirty-four wells from the oilfields are
presented in Table 1. The brines are characterized by Na/C1 Most oil brines in the studied area are depleted in sulfate
ratios similar to those of normal seawater (0.86), but show as compared to the oil-free brines, and both groups are de-
higher ratios of C a / M g ( m a r i n e C a / M g = 0.19). The range pleted with respect to normal seawater and with respect to the
of C1 concentrations is from 17 to 53 g / L and that of SO4 is Heletz brine in Saad- 1 and the M a v q i i m brine in Gaza- 1 bore-
from 6 to 1470 m g / L (Fig. 3). The SO4/C1 ratios (expressed holes (Fig. 3). Since the oil-free brines and oil brines are
in weight units) show a large range, between 0.2 × 10 -3 and closely located in the same lithostratigraphic units, and have
46 × 10 3 ( m a r i n e SO4/C1 = 0.144). No correlation was a similar chemical composition, they must have formed at the
found between sulfate and chloride concentrations and SO4/ same time and from the same original seawater masses. There-
C1 ratios, and the lithology of the Formation, either sandstone fore, the advanced depletion in sulfate in the oil brines must
or dolomite. The oil brines have the same general major solute be due to processes which have occurred in conjunction with
composition as brines obtained from dry wells in the same the crude oil. The low SO4/C1 in some of the oil-free brines
field. However, nine samples out of fourteen dry boreholes can be explained by a previous contact between the brines
have sulfate concentrations above 550 m g / L , whereas only and crude. Such an association could be disrupted by migra-
two out of thirty-two oil brines fall in this range. Thus, the tion of either the waters or the oil to different sites. It should
SO4/C1 ratios in the oil brines are generally lower than those be remembered that crude oil is found in relatively close prox-
of the oil-free brines (Table 1). The Gaza-1 and Saad-1 imity to the oil-free brines as is the case of sample BT-23
brines, south and south-east of the oilfields, have ionic ratios from Kokhav 9 borehole, which is located about 400 m above
similar to those of the oilfield brines except for their higher an oil-producing horizon. Although the p h e n o m e n o n of de-
SO4/C1 ratios (Fig. 3 ) , which are due to higher SO4 concen- pletion in sulfate in interstitial waters associated with organic
trations. matter in anaerobic environment is well known, only little
Table 2 shows the sulfur isotopic composition of sulfate data on sulfate in oil brines have been published (Washburue,
from eleven brines collected from oil-producing wells and 1914; Kartsev et al., 1959;.London, 1964).
Sulfate removal from subsurface brines 3529

The variations in S O 4 content in Ca-chloride brines as a Table 2.6345 of sulfate in brines from the Heletz Fm.
function of sulfate reduction and precipitation of sulfate min- (L. Cretaceous) and Mavqiim Fro. (Gaza-1, Miocene).
erals (gypsum and anhydrite) is discussed in the present
study. The model for the evolution of Ca-chloride brines from
Sample Well 634Sso4 F* F#red
seawater includes three stages (Starinsky, 1974; Carpenter,
1978): D-704 Heletz 11 39.2 0.021 0.039
D-724 Heletz 11 45.2 0.017 0.043
1 ) A restricted sea or lagoonal water body where gypsum is D-730 Heletz 11 43.5 0.018 0.042
deposited due to surface evaporation. D-723 Heletz 22 59.0 0.0048 0.055
2) Interstitial water at the bottom sediments of the lagoon, D-720 Heletz 35 51.6 0.0065 0.053
where dolomitization takes place accompanied by gypsum D-731 Heletz 35 44.8 0.011 0.049
precipitation (Eqn. 1 ), and bacterial sulfate reduction ac- D-711 Heletz 37 39.4 0.016 0.044
companied by CaCO3 precipitation (Eqn. 2). D-706 Kokhav 3 45.2 0.052 0.148
D-721 Kokhav 3 40.7 0.066 0.134
2CACO3 + Mg 2÷ + SOn2- + 2H20 = D-729 Kokhav ll 33.8 0.121 0.079
D-705 Kokhav 14 35.4 0.099 0.101
CalVlg(CO3)2 + CaSO4"2H20. (1)
D-203 Gaza-1 26.4 0.50
2CH20 + SOn2 = H2S + 2HCO3 . (2) D-170 Saad-1 26.3 0.37

3) Migration into the surrounding rocks where mixing *: F: Fraction of sulfate remaining in solution.
and epigenetic reactions may occur. #: Fred: Fraction of sulfate removed by sulfate reduction during
water-oil interaction assuming that 94 and 80% were removed
from the Heletz and Kokhav oilfields brines, respectively, during
In the present study we evaluate quantitatively each of the their earlier evolution.
above processes in the evolution of the Heletz Formation
brines. In addition we present geochemical and isotopic evi-
dence for sulfate reduction during brine-oil interaction. The F value of the oil brines from Gaza- 1 and Saad- 1 bore-
Figure 4 presents 6345so4 data from Table 2 on a Rayleigh holes as presented on the diagram were calculated by nor-
distillation diagram which is based on the Rayleigh distilla- malizing the SO4/C1 ratio in the brines to the marine SO4/C1
tion equation (after Goldhaber and Kaplan, 1974): ratio (0.14). We assume that the SO4 and C1 concentrations
(~345f = 634Si --~ 1 0 0 0 ( a ' - 1) In F, (3) of the Miocene seawater were similar to the present-day sea-
water (Holland et al., 1986). Since the Na/C1 ratio of the
where: brines is about 0.86 (marine value), it was concluded that the
studied water did not precipitate halite. The diagram illus-
6 3 4 S f, 6345i : final and initial 6 34Sso4, respectively.
o/t: trates the strong sulfate depletion in the oil brines, in which
Fractionation factor, a~6s = 1 / a
generally over 90% and locally over 99% of the sulfate has
F: Fraction of the sulfate remaining in the brine.
been removed. The largest depletions are reported from the
The solid lines in the diagram thus follow the theoretical ev- Heletz oilfield. The two different areas occupied on the Ray-
olutionary paths of the remaining sulfate in a solution in a leigh diagram by the fluids from Heletz and Kokhav oilfields
closed system under various sulfate fractionation factors ( a ) . indicate that ( 1 ) the brines in the two oilfields had somewhat

Heletz Formation Brines


55-

50-
+
+

45 - ~ -I-

"~" 40" Ir- [] Saad-1

"~ 35' ~+
-4-
• []
Gaza-1
+ + • ~Messlnlan~

25-
-h-
A A
202 ++ seawater []

15
0 5bo lo'oo 15bo 2o'oo 2500 3ooo
S04 (mg/I)
FIG. 3. Chloride vs. sulfate concentrations in the oil brines (+) and oil-free brines (A) in the Heletz Formation. The
concentrations in Gaza-l, Saad-1 and seawater (squares) are given for comparison.
3530 I. Gavrieli et al.

70

65

60
0.0014
I
S 0 4 / CI

o;,o\\ 0.014
I

0~=1.04
0.14

55

50

45

40

35

30
Saad- 1
25 zx I
20 i I I I I I Ill I I I I I I fll I I I I I I II
0.001 0.01 0.1
F
FIG. 4. /534Sso4 of the oil brines plotted on a Rayleigh diagram. F is the fraction of sulfate remaining in the solutions
and is calculated as (SOJCI)br~J(SOJC1) . . . . ,~r, assuming SOJCI in Miocene seawater was similar to the present day
ratio. The lines projecting from F = 1 and 6~4Sso~ = 20%o denote the evolutionary path of sulfate during closed system
sulfate reduction at various fractionation factors (a). Arrows are drawn between samples collected from the same
boreholes, their direction denoting the chemical changes with time.

different histories and (2) the brines in each field had similar be concluded that the Messinian brines lost their sulfate
history. through both gypsum precipitation and sulfate reduction. Ap-
Taking Gaza- 1 as a typical representative of the Messinian plying the Rayleigh distillation equation, the relative role of
interstitial waters or its in situ diagenetic derivative, it appears each of the processes in removing sulfate from the Mavqiim
that about 50% of the original seawater sulfate was removed lagoon can be estimated. Two limiting cases must be consid-
at an early stage, before migration and before interaction with ered (box in Fig. 5): (1) sulfate reduction preceded gypsum
oil took place. The initial sulfur isotopic composition of the precipitation (pathway a) and (2) gypsum precipitation pre-
Upper Miocene seawater sulfate can be estimated from the ceded sulfate reduction (pathway b). In both cases a fraction-
634Sso4 of the anhydrite in the Mavqiim Formation which is ation factor of 1.030 is assumed, corresponding to average
+21.7 to +22.7%0 (Nissenbaum, 1978). This range falls values in anoxic lagoons and recent interstitial waters (Gold-
within the global 634Sso4 composition of marine evaporite sul- haber and Kaplan, 1974). In the first case, the ratio of sulfate
fate during the Miocene (Claypool et al., 1980). The sulfur removal due to precipitation vs. that of reduction is about 3:2
fractionation during gypsum precipitation from seawater has (0.31:0.19), while in the second case the ratio is about 3:1
been shown to be l - 2 % o (Raab and Spiro, 1991 ), implying (0.38:0.12), the numbers being the displacement along the F
that the Messinian seawater from which the Mavqiim brines coordinate. In all other cases the two processes alternate or
evolved (and consequently the Heletz Formation brines ) had occur simultaneously and the ratio will fall within these
a 634Sso4 ~ 2(F/00, similar to present-day oceanic composition. ranges. Thus, it is evident that within the Messinian lagoonal
Thus, the heavier value of 634Sso4 = 26.4%0 in the Gaza-1 and interstitial water stages, more sulfate must have been re-
Mavqiim brine indicates that some of its sulfate removal was moved through precipitation than by bacterial reduction. Such
accompanied by sulfur isotope fractionation which enriched high percentage of sulfate removal through gypsum precipi-
the residual brine in 34S. tation can take place either through introduction of Ca by
Sulfate reduction in seawater is accompanied by sulfur iso- dolomitization followed by gypsum precipitation (Eqn. 1 ) or
tope fractionation whereby the lighter isotope, 32S, is prefer- in a combination with surface evaporation. That dolomitiza-
entially reduced. Although it may appear as if the Gaza-1 tion occurred is confirmed by the relatively high Ca/Mg ratio
Mavqiim brines have evolved from seawater composition of the Mavqiim brine ( = 1.63, Table 1 ) and the presence of
through sulfate reduction along the line of a = 1.01, this pos- dolostones in the Mavqiim Formation.
sibility must be rejected. As evident from the CaSO4 in the The next step in which sulfate was removed from the brine
Mavqiim Formation, these brines have lost part of their sulfate was during the migration of the Mavqiim brines into the sur-
through gypsum precipitation (Starinsky, 1974), and since rounding country rocks. The process responsible for such sul-
the latter process is accompanied by only minor fractionation fate removal is gypsum or anhydrite precipitation due to
( 1-2%0, i.e., a ~ 1.001 - 1.002, see above), it cannot account subsurface epigenetic dolomitization (Eqn. 1 ). Since only
for the sulfur isotopic composition of the brine. Thus, it must negligible fractionation takes place in this process, it is rep-
Sulfate removal from subsurface brines 3531

0.0014 S04/ CI 0.014 0.14


70 i I
%=,o, \o=,o,
60 X ~~
55
X
50
~o
45
Heletz x

~ - Kokhav
Ko
35 SO4 re

30
gYPsi~mta~ ~ '~ S
GaZa~ ~

200.001 I I I I I I 111
0.01
I I I I I I I I
0.1
I I I i~'=r =

F
FIG. 5. Sulfate evolution of the Gaza-1 Messinian brine through gypsum precipitation and bacterial sulfate reduction
plotted on a Rayleigh diagram. Horizontal arrows represent gypsum precipitation with no sulfur fractionation. Inclining
arrows follow the sulfate evolutionary path during bacterial sulfate reduction. Two possible pathways from original
seawater to Gaza-1 brines are shown: (a) bacterial sulfate reduction followed by sulfate precipitation and (b) sulfate
precipitation followed by bacterial sulfate reduction, ot = 1.03 is assumed for bacterial sulfate reduction in both paths.

resented on the Rayleigh diagram (Fig. 5) by an horizontal samples collected from the same boreholes at different times
arrow starting at Gaza-1 (6345SO4 = 26.4). It should be noted (Heletz-11, Heletz-35, and Kokhav-3). Of the four time in-
that the arrow crosses the Saad-1 point at 63% removal of the tervals between samplings (arrows in Fig. 4), three show sul-
original seawater sulfate. This process took place somewhere fate increases and 6345so4 decreases with time, and the fourth
along the way between the Mavqiim and Heletz Formation, shows the opposite trend. No significant change in the con-
probably in the Judea group carbonates (Fig. 2). centration of chloride was observed in any of the boreholes.
Sulfate depletion is accompanied by an increase in The 634Sso4 decrease-sulfate increase suggest that the more
6345so4 in each oilfield (Fig. 4). A similar correlation exists recent brines are different parcels of essentially the same
between samples collected from the same borehole and same brine, having the same chlorinity, which has experienced
depth on different dates. The arrows in Fig. 4 show the chem- lower degrees of sulfate reduction. The fourth time interval
ical and isotopic changes with time. Such correlation is gen- could be explained by either present-day bacterial activity at
erally attributed to S fractionation during sulfate reduction. depth, or subsurface flow.
Indirect evidence for such a reaction may be found by the The S fractionation factors that accompanied the sulfate
negative 613C values, up to -20.4%0 (Calvo, 1993), of sec- reduction in the above brines was calculated by applying Eqn.
ondary calcite veins in the Heletz reservoir rock. This contri- 4: 6345i, 634S f are the lower and higher 6345SO4 values in each
bution of bicarbonate originates from organic sources, such borehole, respectively. (SO4/C1) are the corresponding ratios
as would be released during the sulfate reduction process and F = (S04[CI)f](S04]C1)i. The calculated values are oe
(Eqn. 2). = 1.013 and o~ = 1.019 for Heletz-35 and Kokhav-3, respec-
Of the two known sulfate reduction mechanisms, thermo- tively, and t~ = 1.029 and a = 1.031 for the two time intervals
chemical and bacterial, the first requires temperatures of more in Heletz- 11 borehole.
than 100-150°C (Orr, 1974; Krouse et al., 1988), though it In addition to the above single borehole calculations, gen-
has been suggested that the process may occur at temperatures eral fractionation factors were calculated as best fit lines for
as low as 70°C (McManus and Hanor, 1993). The present- all the 6 34Sso 4 data points in each oilfield. The values obtained
day temperature-depth relationship in the oilfields (Starinsky, are 1.012 and 1.014 for Heletz and Kokhav oilfields, respec-
1974) shows maximum temperatures of 5 0 - 6 0 ° C at the depth tively. When drawn on the Rayleigh diagram the intercept of
of the brines in question ( 1 5 0 0 - 1 8 0 0 m). There is no evi- the calculated lines with the horizontal arrow starting at Mav-
dence that the brines were ever exposed to higher tempera- qiim Gaza-1 634S504 = 26.4%0 is at F = 0.06 and F = 0.20,
tures and it is therefore deduced that bacterial sulfate reduc- respectively (Fig. 5). These imply that approximately 94 and
tion is responsible for the observed trend. 80% of the original seawater sulfate was removed, respec-
The dynamic and heterogeneous nature of the sulfate sys- tively, before the brine-oil interaction began. The Heletz brine
tem of the oilfield brines may be observed by the change with in Saad-1, outside the oilfields, thus represent only one stage
time in sulfate concentrations and isotopic compositions in through which the Messinian brines evolved in the subsurface.
3532 I. Gavrieli et al.

The similar fractionation factors indicate that similar condi- 3 ) Dilution of the brines to various degrees occurred by mix-
tions for sulfate reduction exist in both fields, while the dif- ing with fresh groundwater. This dilution did not signifi-
ferent intercepts indicate different histories for the Heletz and cantly change the chemical ratios among the major sol-
Kokhav brines before the onset of reduction. utes.
It is now possible to determine the fraction of sulfate that 4) Contact occurred between the diluted brines and crude oil.
was removed during the bacterial sulfate reduction in the pres- However, there are no geochemical indications nor un-
ence of the crude. This value is the difference between the equivocal geological controls to suggest whether the crude
above calculated value of sulfate remaining in the oilfield oil in the Heletz Formation migrated with the brines or the
brine prior to its contact with the crude and F, the fraction of brines came into contact with the oil as they migrated to
sulfate presently found in each sample. The values obtained their present location.
(Table 2) indicate that 8 - 1 5 % of the original sulfate were 5) The contact with the crude enabled S-reducing microor-
removed from the Kokhav oilfield brines during this stage ganisms to flourish. The sulfate reduction was accompa-
while only 4 - 6 % were removed from the Heletz oilfield nied by sulfur isotope fractionation. This process enriched
brines. Thus, despite the extreme depletion of sulfate in the the remaining sulfate in the oil brines with 345, reaching
studied Heletz Formation Ca-chloride brines, only a relatively values as high as 634Sso4 = 59.0%0 in Heletz-22 borehole.
small fraction of it was removed as a result of the contact with 6) In the Kokhav oilfield brines, the bacterial sulfate reduc-
the hydrocarbons. However, due to the low concentration of tion removed 8 - 1 5 % of the original seawater sulfate,
sulfate at the onset of the reduction, it significantly altered the whereas in the Heletz oilfield brines it accounts for no
isotopic composition of the remaining sulfate. more than 6%. However, due to the low concentration of
sulfate at the onset of the reduction, it significantly altered
5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS the isotopic composition of the remaining sulfate.
7) The oil-brine system in the oilfield is dynamic and parcels
The behaviour of sulfate was studied in the Ca-chloride
of brines of different chemical and isotopic characteristics
brines from productive oilfields of the Heletz Formation in
were sampled within periods of months. The chemical and
the Israeli Mediterranean coastal plain. The two identified wa-
isotopic compositions of brines can therefore be used not
ter groups, the oil brines, associated with oil and the oil-free
only as indications for sedimentary and diagenetic pro-
brines from dry wells, were found to be similar in their major
cesses but also to help identify brines which are or have
chemical components. Both are depleted in SO4 compared to
previously been spatially associated with hydrocarbons.
evaporated seawater with the same salinity. However, the oil
brines were found to be low in sulfate in comparison with oil-
free brines from the same oil-producing field. The 634S values Acknowledgments We would like to thank E. Kashai and G. Gvirtz-
man for permission to use information from oil boreholes and water
of the sulfate in the oil brines are in the range of +30%o to
samples. Special thanks are due to M. Leng for assistance with the
+60°/oo while that of the sulfate in Heletz Formation brine of analyses of sulfur isotopes and to A. Bein and M. Goldberg for fruit-
the Saad-I borehole, outside the oilfield, is 26.3%0. The latter ful discussions. Chemical analyses were carried out by R. Bilu-
value is similar to that of the Gaza-1 brines in the Miocene Greenblat, R. Binshtuk, N. Dalman, and R. Nisan. We also thank
Mavqiim Formation, and is heavier than the 634Sso4 = 20°/oo A. M. Stueber and J. S. Hanor and an anonymous reviewer for sig-
nificantly improving the paper.
of the original Miocene seawater from which the oilfield
brines are believed to have evolved.
The SOa/Cl ratios and 634S of the sulfate in the Mavqiim Editorial handling: E. J. Reardon
brines and in the Heletz Formation brines suggest the follow-
ing evolutionary path: REFERENCES

1 ) Evaporitic lagoons which existed in the Upper Miocene, Amit O. (1978) Organochemical evaluation of the Gevar'am shales
at the onset of the Mediterranean desiccation, are the (Lower Cretaceous), Israel, as possible oil source rocks. Amer.
Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull, 62, 827-836.
source of the Ca-chloride brines in the Heletz Formation.
Bein A. and Sofer Z. (1987) Origin of oils in the Heletz region,
Sulfate was removed from the brines of these Mavqiim Israel--implication for exploration in the eastern Mediterranean.
lagoon (s) through both gypsum precipitation and bacte- Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 71, 65-75.
rial sulfate reduction. In the Gaza-1 Mavqiim brines some Bentor Y. K. (1969) On the evolution of subsurface brines in Israel.
50% of the sulfate were removed, mostly through precip- Chem. Geol. 4, 83-110.
Calvo R. (1993) The diagenetic history of Heletz Formation and the
itation, while the sulfate reduction resulted in a change in timing of hydrocarbons accumulation in Heletz-Kokhav oilfield.
634Sso4, from an original seawater composition of 2 0 - M.Sc. dissertation, Hebrew Univ. Jerusalem (in Hebrew, English
26.4%0. Part, if not all, of the gypsum precipitation was Abstr.).
due to dolomitization of the young carbonate sediments. Carpenter A. B. (1978) Origin and chemical evolution of brines in
sedimentary basins. Oklahoma Get. Surv. Circ. 79, 60-77.
Bacterial sulfate reduction occurred either within the evap-
Claypool G. E., Holser W. T., Kaplan I. R., Sakai H., and Zak I.
orating lagoon (s) or in the interstitial brines of its sedi- (1980) The age curves of sulfur and oxygen isotopes in marine
ments. sulfate and their mutual interpretation. Chem. Geol. 28, 199-260.
2) Migration of evolved Mavqiim brines into the Heletz For- Cohen Z. ( 1971 ) The geology of the Lower Cretaceous in the Heletz
mation was accompanied by dolomitization and gypsum field, Israel. Ph.D. dissertation, Hebrew Univ. Jerusalem (in He-
brew, English Abstr.).
precipitation which further depleted the sulfate concentra- Coleman M. L. and Moore M. P. ( 1978 ) Direct reduction of sulfates
tion in the brines though without significantly changing to sulfur for isotopic analysis. Anal Chem. 50, 1594-1595.
their sulfur isotopic compositions. Collins A. G. (1975) Geochemistry of Oilfield Waters. Elsevier.
Sulfate removal from subsurface brines 3533

Derin B. and Reiss Z. (1973) Revision of marine Neogene stratig- Land L. S. (1992) Saline formation waters in sedimentary basins:
raphy in Israel. Isr. J. Earth Sci. 22, 199-21. Connate or diagenetic? In WaterRock Interaction (ed. Y. K. Khar-
Fleischer E., Goidberg M., Gat J. R., and Magaritz M. (1977) Iso- aka and A. S. Maest), Vol. 2, pp. 865-868. Balkema.
topic composition of formation waters from deep drillings in Lerman A. (1970) Model of chemical evolution of a chloride lake--
southern Israel. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 41, 511-525. the Dead Sea. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 31, 2309-2330.
Gilboa Y., Fligelman H., and Derin B. (1990) Heletz-Brur-Kokhav Levorsen A. I. (1958) Geology of Petroleum. W. H. Freeman.
field--Israel. In Treatise of Petroleum Geology, Atlas of Oil and London E. E. (1964) The degree of groundwater saturation with dis-
Gas Fields, Structural Traps (ed. E. A. Beaumont and N. H. Fos- solved hydrocarbons and sulfates as a criterion for the evaluation
ter), Vol. IV, pp. 319-341. AAPG. of oil-gas prospects. Gebl. Neff. Gaza 11, 41-47 (in Russian).
Goldhaber M. B. and Kaplan I. R. (1974) The sulfur cycle. In The McManus K. M. and Hanor J. S. (1993) Diagenetic evidence for
Sea (ed. E. D. Goldberg), Vol. 5, Chap. 17, pp. 569-656. Wiley. massive evaporite dissolution, fluid flow, and mass transfer in the
Grader P. (1960) Geological history of the Heletz-Brnr area, Israel, Louisiana Gulf Coast. Geology 21, 727-730.
Part II, Lower Cretaceous. Geol. Surv. Israel. Bull. 31. Nissenbanm A. (1978) Sulfur isotope distribution in sulfate from
Hanor J. S. (1988) Origin and Migration of Subsurface Sedimentary surface waters from the Northern Jordan Valley, Israel. Environ.
Brines; Soc. Econ. Paleontol. Min. Short Course 21. Sci. Tech. 12, 962-965.
Hanor J. S. (1994) Origin of saline fluids in sedimentary basins. Orr W. L. (1974) Changes in sulfur content and isotopic ratios of
In Geofluids: Origin, Migration and Evolution of Fluids in Sed- sulfur during petroleum maturation--study of Big Horn Basin Pa-
imentary Basins (ed. J. Parnell); Geol. Soc. Spec. Pub. 78, leozoic oils. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 50, 2295-2318.
151-174. Raab M. and Spiro B. (1991) Sulfur isotopic variations during sea-
Hardie L. A. (1990) The role of rifting and hydrothermal CaCl2 water evaporation with fractional crystallization. Chem. Geol. 86,
brines in the origin of potash evaporites: An hypothesis. Amer. J.
323-333.
Sci. 290, 43-106.
Starinsky A. (1974) Relationship between Ca-chloride brines and
Hernt B., Starinsky A., Katz A., and Bein A. (1990) The role of
sedimentary rocks in Israel. Ph.D. dissertation, Hebrew Univ. Je-
seawater freezing in the formation of subsurface brines. Geochim.
Cosmochim. Acta 54, 13-21. rusalem (In Hebrew, English Abstr.).
Holland H. D., Lazar B., and McCaffrey M. (1986) Evolution of Starinsky A., Bielski M., Lazar B., Steinitz G., and Raab M. (1983)
atmosphere and oceans. Nature 320, 27-30. Strontium isotopic evidence on the history of oiifield brines, Med-
Hsu K. J. (1972) When the Mediterranean dried up. Sci. Amer. 227, iterranean Coastal Plain, Israel. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 47,
27-36. 687-695.
Kartsev A. A., Tabasaranskii A. A., Subotta M. I., and Mogilevskii Sulin V. A. (1946) Waters of Petroleum Formations in the System
G. A. (1959) Geochemical methods of prospecting and explora- of Natural Waters. Gostoptekhizdat (in Russian).
tion for petroleum and natural gas. Univ. California Press. Vengosh A., Starinsky A., and Chivas A. R. (1994) Boron isotopes
Krouse R. H., Viau C. A., Eliuk L. S., Ueda A., and Halas S. (1988) in Heletz-Kokhav oilfield brines, the coastal plain, Israel. Isr. J.
Chemical and isotopic evidence of thermochemical sulfate reduc- Earth Sci. 43, 231-237.
tion by light hydrocarbon gases in deep carbonate reservoirs. Na- Washburne C. W. (1914) Chlorides in oil-field waters. Amer. Inst.
ture 333, 415-419. Mining Eng. Trans. 48, 687-693.

También podría gustarte