Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
edu/departments/sports-medicine/education/medical-professionals/rehabilitation-protocols
Foldere / Tematica : Tenex - Concussion - HIP - Knee, ankle and foot - Other - descarcate la 04.05.2019
Patient
evaluated
by
physician
and referred
to:
Speech-
Physical Occupational
Language
Therapy Therapy
Pathology
Background
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines a concussion as a type of mild traumatic brain
injury (TBI) caused by a bump, blow, or jolt to the head. Concussions can also occur from a fall or a blow to the
6
body that causes the head and brain to move quickly back and forth. Most people with a concussion recover
quickly and fully. But for some people, symptoms can last for days, weeks, or longer. Persistent symptoms are
referred to as post-concussive syndrome (PCS). A definition of PCS is provided by the World Health
Organization’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), including 3 or more of the following: headache,
dizziness, fatigue, irritability, insomnia, concentration difficulty or memory difficulty. In general, recovery may be
slower among older adults, young children, and teens. Those who have had a concussion in the past are also at
6
risk of having another one and may find that it takes longer to recover if they have another concussion. Lingering
symptoms of a concussion typically fall into four categories (1) physical, (2) cognitive, (3) emotional/mood, (4)
6
sleep. Individuals with post-concussive symptoms often have difficulty transitioning back to activities such as
11
work, school, and play. The role of occupational therapists (OT) is to address performance skills and patterns to
4
promote return to engagement in meaningful and purposeful activities.
Evaluation
Client History • Relevant information: Age, date of injury, mechanism of injury, symptoms at time of injury
and and present, did client lose consciousness, was post-traumatic amnesia present, number
Occupational and impact of previous concussions, other past-medical history including medical co-
2,4
Profile morbidities and psychosocial client factors
• Comparison of prior level of function and current level of function: ADL, IADL, school, work,
and/or sport, and other meaningful interests
• Current symptom ratings: Concussion Grading Scale (CGS), Refer to Appendix A
Physical Symptoms associated with PCS may include headache, blurry or double vision, nausea,
6
dizziness, sensitivity to noise or light, balance problems, fatigue or low energy
• OT screening of UE ROM, strength, coordination, sensation, and posture.
• If neck or balance issues are present, collaboration with PT is recommended. See PT CPG.
11
• Vision – Oculomotor function
o Research has identified objective findings that show difference in saccadic eye
16
movements, smooth pursuits and tracking in control group vs PCS group
o Assess through observation as well as standardized assessments
o Standardized assessments to consider
14,25
§ Developmental Eye Movement Test* (DEM)
,13
§ King-Devick Assessment*
,19
§ NSUCO Saccades Testing*
,19
§ NSUCO Pursuits Testing*
§ *See Visual Screening CPG for additional details
• Vision – Convergence and Accommodation
o Changes in accommodation and convergence have been identified in individuals with
22
PCS
o Assess through questionnaire and standardized assessments
24
§ Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS)
• Scores >21 can indicate impairment, recommend referral to optometrist
,23,26
§ Near point of convergence*
,27
§ Amplitude of accommodation*
§ *See Visual Screening CPG for additional details
o Occupational therapists can work collaboratively with optometrists to improve near
11
focus, convergence, and accommodative function
• Sensory Processing
o Assess through interview and questionnaire
§ Interview may include asking about screen time tolerance, light and sound
sensitivities
5
§ Adult Sensory Profile
• Vestibular Function
o Assess through screening and questionnaire
7
§ The Vestibular Disorders Activities of Daily Living Scale
1,21
§ The Vestibular Activities and Participation Measure
§ VOR, VOR cancellation, Head Impact Testing (HIT). See PT CPG.
§ Recommend collaboration with Physical Therapy in this area
Cognitive Symptoms may include difficulty thinking clearly, feeling slowed down, difficulty concentrating,
6
or difficulty remembering new information
• Work collaboratively with speech-language pathologists to address cognitive deficits, with
4
overarching goal of improving occupational performance
• SLP to focus on standardized testing and remediation of deficits of executive functioning,
4
memory, cognitive endurance
4
• OTs and SLPs collaborate on return to school or work plans and accommodations
• May also seek input from physicians and rehabilitation psychologists as part of
collaborative treatment team
• Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), if not completed by SLP, is a standardized
assessment that can be utilized to measure cognitive skills. See SLP CPG.
Emotional Symptoms following concussion may include irritability, sadness, nervousness, or an overall
6
feeling of being more emotional
• Symptoms may be identified with utilization of CGS questionnaire or through discussion
• Research suggests mindfulness is key to occupational engagement and may enhance
10
health and well-being
• May also seek input regarding emotional health from physicians, rehabilitation
psychologists, and social workers as part of collaborative treatment team
6
Sleep Symptoms may include trouble falling asleep or sleeping more or less than usual
• Symptoms may be identified with utilization of CGS questionnaire or through discussion
• It could be the case that sleep disturbances are secondary to other symptoms such as
depression or anxiety. Management strategies should take this potential interaction of
20
symptoms into account.
Intervention
Physical • Vision – treatment interventions may include teaching compensatory strategies to address
11
Symptoms difficulties with light sensitivity or visual tracking. A rehabilitative approach would involve
working in collaboration with optometrists and/or ophthalmologists to address impairments
in oculomotor function, binocular vision and accommodation. See neurovision CPG for
additional detail.
• Sensory Processing – treatment intervention includes recommendations of environmental
11
adaptations to modify reactions to sensory stimulation.
• Fatigue Management – education on energy conservation strategies including planning,
prioritizing, and pacing during ADL/IADL completion. Fatigue coping strategies can be
20
found in Appendix 12.3 of cited article, pg 96.
Emotional • Training in mindfulness-based techniques and goal directed techniques to help manage the
Symptoms emotional and physical symptoms of PCS and improve participation in daily activities and
8,15
occupation
• Mindfulness-based techniques include
3
o Stress reduction techniques
18,20
o Relaxation techniques
• When individuals anticipate that activities will provoke autonomic symptoms of dizziness or
headache, relaxation techniques can be implemented to prolong the ability to engage in a
4
functional task
• May also benefit from mindfulness and relaxation techniques during OT treatment sessions
4
to increase tolerance for therapeutic activity
• Goal directed interventions include: symptom management, assertiveness training, and
4
guided return to engagement in meaningful occupations
o Assertiveness training can be vital following “invisible injury,” such as concussion, to
empower individuals to ask for accommodations needed for successful return to school
9
or work
17
Cognitive • Executive function – remediating executive function skills affecting daily routines
Symptoms • Establishing healthy routines
o Strategies may include taking breaks and utilizing organizational tools
o Aim to assist in completion of daily routine while minimizing symptoms
• Work in collaboration with SLP to address cognitive deficits
4
Sleep • Provide education on the role of sleep in recovery
12
Symptoms • Facilitate healthy daily routines and sleep habits
o Plan rest breaks
o Make environmental modifications
o Manage symptoms
20
o Sleep hygiene advice (Appendix 7.1, pg 82)
• Other strategies
o Gradually reducing daytime naps, while increasing physical activity to promote a return
to nighttime sleeping
4
o Environmental modifications may include
§ Limiting screen usage in bed
§ Use of light-blocking curtains
§ Blue-light filters for electronic devices
Occupational Planning for return to school and work should occur in collaboration with treatment team,
Performance including physician, psychologist, SLP, PT and OT.
11 11
Return to school Return to work
• Research suggests the importance of returning • Recommendation for initial
individuals to structured activities, including school, as period of rest, followed by
soon as possible to establish general sense of graduated return to work if
improved well-being and restore a consistent routine. one’s job permits
Modifications for visual difficulties: • Therapists can work with
• Using a line guide or tinted transparency when reading patients and their employers
to help with visual tracking or reduce glare on strategies to help manage
• May benefit from larger print or access to lesson notes symptoms
ahead of time o Creating modified
Modifications for general sensory sensitivity, including workstations
decreased tolerance for crowds and visual motion: o Using anti-glare
• Allow student to change classes ahead of time computer screens
• Provide alternative to eating lunch in a busy cafeteria o Implementing frequent
Modifications at the college level: rest breaks
• Recommend accommodations such as preprinted
notes, increased test time, use of recording devices for
taking notes
• Compensatory strategies for visual tracking when
reading
• Line guide, glare reduction transparencies, reducing
screen brightness
• Social activities recommendations
• Therapists can assist in identifying activities that are
less stimulating, therefore less likely to provoke
symptoms
• Avoid studying or eating lunch with a large group of
peers, and meet with small groups in less stimulating
environments
Appendix A: Ohio State Concussion Grading Scale
Circle the number in each row that best describes the way you have been feeling relative to the
symptom. Patient Name
1. Over the past week, my sleeping pattern has changed. ☐ Yes ☐ No If NO, skip to #2
a. Have you been taking naps during the middle of the day? ☐ Yes ☐ No
b. Are you waking during the night? ☐ Yes ☐ No
2. Over the past week, my participation in work or school has been % of what it would be
normally.
3. Over the past week, my participation in physical activity (sports, working out, etc.) has been
% of what it would be normally.
4. Do you feel like you are putting more effort more effort into maintaining schoolwork/grades and/or work
productivity? (Circle corresponding number below)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
No More Effort -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A Lot More Effort
References
1. Alghwiri, A. et al. (2012). The development and validation of the Vestibular Activities and Participation Measure. Archives
of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 93, 1822-31.
2. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd
ed ). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Suppl. 1), S1– S48.
3. Azulay, J., Smart, C.M., Mott, T., & Cicerone, K.D. (2013). A pilot study examining the effect of mindfulness-based stress
reduction on symptoms of chronic mild traumatic brain injury/postconcussive syndrome. Journal of Head Trauma
Rehabilitation, 28, 323-331.
4. Brayton-Chung, A. et al. (2016). Action: The role of occupational therapy in concussion rehabilitation. OT Practice. 11-
21-2016, 9-12.
5. Brown, C., Tollefson, N., Dunn, W., Cromwell, R., & Filion, D. (2001). The Adult Sensory Profile: Measuring patterns of
sensory processing. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 75-82.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Traumatic brain injury & concussion. Retrieved from
http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/index.html
7. Cohen, H. (2014). Use of the Vestibular Disorders Activities of Daily Living Scale to describe functional limitations in
patients with vestibular disorders. Journal of Vestibular Research. 24, 33-38.
8. Doig, E., Fleming, J., Kulpers, P., Cornwell, P., & Khan, A. (2011) Goal-directed outpatient rehabilitation following TBI: A
pilot study of programme effectiveness and comparison of outcomes in home and day hospital settings. Brain Injury, 25,
1114-1125.
9. Donker-Cools, B.H.P.M., Daams, J.G., Wind, H., & Frings-Dresen, M.H.W. (2016). Effective return-to-work interventions
after acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Brain Injury, 30, 113-131.
10. Elliot, M.L. (2011). Being mindful about mindfulness: An invitation to extend occupational engagement into the growing
mindfulness discourse. Journal of Occupational Science, 18, 366-376)
11. Finn, C. & Waskiewicz, M. (2015). The role of occupational therapy in managing Post-Concussive Syndrome, published
by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc., Physical Disabilities Special Interest Section Quarterly, 38(1), 1-
4.
12. Fung, C., Wiseman-Hakes, C., Stergiou-Kita, M., Nguyen, M., & Colantonia, A. (2013). Time to wake up: Bridging the gap
between theory and practice for sleep in occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 384-386.
13. Galetta, K.M., et al. (2011). The King-Devick test and sports-related concussion: study of a rapid visual screening tool in
a collegiate cohort. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 309, 34-39.
14. Garzia, R. et al. (1990). A new visual –verbal saccade test: The Developmental Eye Movement test (DEM). Journal of
the American Optometric Association. 61(2), 124-135.
15. Hardison, M.E., & Roll, S. C. (2016). Mindfulness interventions in physical rehabilitation: A scoping review. American
Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70, 7003290030p1-7003290030p9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2016.018069
16. Heitger, M. et al. (2009). Impaired eye movements in post-concussion syndrome indicate suboptimal brain function
beyond the influence of depression, malingering, or intellectual ability. Brain. 132; 2850-2870.
17. Kennedy, M.R.T., Coelho, C., Turkstra, L., Yivisaker, M., Moore Sohlberg, M., Yorkston, K., & Kan, P. (2008). Intervention
for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and clinical recommendations.
Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 18, 257-299.
18. Lazar, S.W., Bush, G., Gollub, R.L., Fricchione, G.L., Khalasa, G., & Benson, H. (2000). Functional brain mapping of the
relaxation response and meditation. Neuroreport, 11, 1581-1585
19. Maples WC. NSUCO Oculomotor test. Santa Ana, CA: Optometric Extension Program. 1995.
20. Marshall S, Bayley M, McCullagh S, Velikonja D, Berrigan L. Clinical practice guidelines for mild traumatic brain injury and
persistent symptoms. Can Fam Physician. 2012; 58: 257-267.
http://onf.org/system/attachments/60/original/Guidelines_for_Mild_Traumatic_Brain_Injury_and_Persistent_Symptoms.pdf
21. Mueller, M. et al. (2015). Subscales of the Vestibular Activities and Participation questionnaire could be applied across
cultures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 68, 211-219.
22. Poltavski, D.V., & Biberdorf, D. (2014). Screening for lifetime concussion in athletes: Importance of oculomotor measures.
Brain Injury. 28, 475-485.
23. Radomski, M. et al. (2014) Composition of a vision screen for service members with Traumatic Brain Injury: Consensus
using a modified nominal technique. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. July/August 2014, Vol. 68, 422-429.
24. Rouse, M et al. (The CITT Investigator Group). (2009) Validity of the CISS: A confirmatory study. Optom Vis Sci. 86(4).
357-63.
25. Richman, J.E. & Garzia, R. P. (2015). The Developmental Eye Movement test, version 2.5. South Bend, IN: Bernell.
26. Scheiman, M. et al. (2003). Nearpoint of Convergence: Test procedure, target selection, and normative data. Optometry
and Vision Science. 80(3). 214-225.
rd
27. Scheiman, M. et al. (2011). Understanding and Managing vision deficits: A guide for occupational therapists (3 ed).
Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
POSTCONCUSSIVE SYNDROME (PCS)
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE: PHYSICAL
THERAPY
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Patient
evaluated
by
physician
and referred
to:
Speech-
Physical Occupational
Language
Therapy Therapy
Pathology
Purpose
The primary purpose of this guideline is to improve the diagnosis of impairments related to PCS, improve the
quality of care and outcomes for patients with impairments related to PCS, and to decrease variations in the
evaluation and management of PCS. This guideline addresses these needs by encouraging accurate and efficient
diagnosis and treatment and, when applicable, facilitating patient follow-up to address the management of long-
term sequelae or evaluation of new or worsening symptoms not indicative of mTBI/concussion. The guideline is
intended for all clinicians in any setting who are likely to diagnose and manage patients with impairments related
to PCS. The target population is inclusive of both adults and adolescents presenting with impairments related to
PCS. This guideline is intended to focus on a limited number of quality improvement opportunities deemed most
important by the CPG and is not intended to be a comprehensive guide for managing PCS.
The recommendations outlined in this guideline are not intended to represent the standard of care for patient
management, nor are the recommendations intended to limit treatment or care provided to individual patients. The
guideline is not intended to replace clinical judgment for individualized patient care. The goal is to create a
guideline with a specific set of focused recommendations based on an established and transparent process that
considers levels of evidence, harm-benefit balance, and expert consensus to resolve gaps in evidence. These
specific recommendations are designed to improve quality of care and may be used to develop performance
measures.
Background
Concussions are a form of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by a bump, blow, or jolt to the head or body
with resultant bouncing and twisting of the brain within the skull. According to the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, concussion is a complex pathophysiologic process induced by traumatic forces secondary to direct or
1
indirect forces to the head that disrupt s the function of the brain. Concussions results in multiple system
impairments including physical, cognitive, emotional and/or sleep-related symptoms which may or may not involve
1
a loss of consciousness. Majority of patients reach full neurologic recovery within 1-2 weeks, however, 15-20%
2,3
will have persistent signs and symptoms beyond 2 weeks. Persistent symptoms are referred to as Post-
concussion Syndrome (PCS) and is diagnosed according to clinical criteria of physical signs and subjective
4
somatic, cognitive and neurobehavioral symptoms, as there is no gold standard diagnostic test. The broadest
and most sensitive PCS definition is provided by the World Health Organization’s International Classification of
Diseases (ICD-10), including 3 or more of the following: headache, dizziness, fatigue, irritability, insomnia,
2,5
concentration difficulty or memory difficulty, refer to Appendix A. Furthermore, PCS has been delineated into
subtypes of post-concussion disorders (PCD) of physiologic PCD, vestibulo-ocular PCD and cervicogenic PCD
3
based on clinical history, physical examination and graded exercise testing.
Summary of Recommendations
Etiology • There are an estimated 1.7-3 million sports and recreation-related concussions each
2,3,6
year
• Symptoms of acute concussion are believed to be secondary to a global cerebral energy
crisis characterized by alterations in cell membrane permeability, ion transport regulation,
3
neurotransmitter release, cellular metabolism and cerebral blood flow (CBF)
• 15-20% patients will have persistent signs and symptoms beyond 2 weeks.
2,3
• PCS has been delineated into subtypes of post-concussion disorders (PCD) of physiologic
PCD, vestibulo-ocular PCD and cervicogenic PCD based on clinical history, physical
3
examination and graded exercise testing – Appendix B
• Current guidelines recommend a period of cognitive and physical rest early post-injury as
2
symptoms/recovery can increase with cognitive and physical exertion
o No scientific evidence suggests that prolonged rest for more than several weeks is
2
beneficial
2
o No scientific evidence that medication speeds recovery
• Encouraged to prioritize treatments in a hierarchical fashion that address symptoms that
5
could delay recovery first
o Primary: depression, anxiety, irritability, sleep disorder, post-traumatic headache
o Secondary: Balance, dizziness, vertigo, cognition impairment, fatigue, tinnitus,
phonophobia
Risk Factors • Prior h/o concussion(s), previous physical limitations, post-traumatic amnesia (PTA),
posttraumatic migraine, skull fracture, dizziness at time of incident, cognitive deficits in first
2,5,7
few days, reduced balance or dizziness in acute stage, nausea after injury
• H/o psychiatric disorders, learning disability, migraines or family h/o migraines
7
Examination • Objective examination measures include assessing components of ROM, posture, joint
mobility and strength testing of the cervicothoracic spine and shoulder complex
• Screening includes neurologic tests, vision, vestibular and c-spine clearance
Outcome • Recommended patient-reported outcome measures include: Concussion Grading Scale,
Testing Post-concussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI- SR5, PCSI-SR8, PCSI-SR13), Neck Disability
1
Index (NDI), Headache Disability Index (HDI), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) ,
10
Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) , SF-36, SF-12
• Recommended family/support reported outcome measures include: Post-Concussion
Symptom Inventory – Parent (PCSI-P)
• Recommended balance centered outcome measures include: Balance Error Scoring
1
System(BESS), Mini-BESTest, Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) , Functional Gait Assessment
1 1
(FGA) HiMAT, Timed Up and Go (TUG) TUG Cognitive, Modified Sensory Organization
1 1
Test (mSOT) , 10-meter walk test (10MWT)
• Recommended vestibular centered outcome measures include: VOR, VOR cancellation,
Head Impulse Test (HIT), Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA), Dix Hall Pike, Joint Position Error,
Motion Sensitivity Quotient (MSQ)
• Recommended cervicogenic centered outcome measures include: joint position error (JPE),
postural stability – with vibration to head/neck as indicated, craniocervical flexion test
(CCFT), head-neck differentiation test, smooth pursuit neck torsion test (SPNT)
• Recommended physiologic centered outcome measures include: Buffalo Concussion
9
Treadmill Test /Balke Protocol
3,8 3,11 3
Key Physiologic PCD Vestibulo-ocular PCD Cervicogenic PCD
Interventions • Physical and cognitive rest • Vestibular rehabilitation • Cervical spine manual
• School/work program therapy
accommodations • Vision therapy program – • Head-neck proprioception
• Sub-symptom threshold refer to OT Vision P2P re-training
aerobic exercise programs • School/work • Balance and gaze
accommodations stabilization exercises
• Sub-symptom threshold • Sub-symptom threshold
aerobic exercise program aerobic exercise program
Recommendations for Outcome Testing
mood disturbances
• Systems review and administration of Concussion Grading Scale (CGS) – current symptoms
Screening • Postural alignment in sitting and standing: forward head, head tilt, rounded shoulders,
shoulder elevation, scapular winging, pelvic alignment/symmetry
• Neurologic screen: sensation/dermatomes, upper and lower extremity myotomes, deep
tendon reflexes (DTR), Hoffman’s, Babinski’s, CN screen
• Visual/oculomotor screen: spontaneous nystagmus, gaze holding nystagmus, smooth
pursuit, saccades, convergence insufficiency, accommodation insufficiency
• Cervical clearing: compression, distraction, spurling’s maneuver, alar ligament, sharp-purser,
transverse ligament, vertebral artery insufficiency
• Vestibular screen: Central/peripheral vestibular screens, joint position error (JPE), postural
16
stability – with vibration to head/neck as indicated, craniocervical flexion test (CCFT), head-
neck differentiation test, smooth pursuit neck torsion test (SPNT)
Tests and • Cervical, thoracic and shoulder A/PROM
Measures • Palpation
• Joint mobility/alignment
• Strength testing: cervical flexion, extension, lateral flexion, rotation, deep neck flexor
isometric hold / cranial cervical flexion test with biofeedback cuff)
• Impairment based outcome measures
o Patient-reported outcome measures: Concussion Grading Scale, Neck Disability Index
1
(NDI), Headache Disability Index (HDI), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) ,
Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS), SF-36, SF-12
o Vestibular outcome measures: VOR, VOR cancellation, Head Impulse Test (HIT),
3
Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA), Dix Hall Pike , Joint Position Error, Motion Sensitivity
Quotient (MSQ), Vestibulo-oculomotor Screen (VOMS)
o Cervicogenic centered outcome measures: Joint Position Error, Postural Stability- with
vibration to head/neck as indicated, craniocervical flexion test (CCFT), head-neck
differentiation test, smooth pursuit neck torsion test (SPNT)
Physical and • Animal experiments found premature exercise within first week post-injury led to
Cognitive Rest impaired cognitive performance and reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor
3
(BDNF)
• Patient’s with symptoms at rest should be managed conservatively with cognitive
3
and physical rest
• Continued cognitive and physical rest is recommended for children
3
Prognostic • Exercise intolerance testing may be emerging as one of the best systemic
18
Utility physiological biomarkers in concussion recovery
• Degree of exercise intolerance shortly after [19- days post] SRC strongly predicts
18
time to recovery
o Subjects with a low HR threshold (<135 bpm) are approximately 45x more likely
18
to have prolonged recovery
Sub-symptom • Animals with mTBI exposed to exercise 14-21 days post exercise were found to
3,8
Threshold improve cognitive performance and high levels of BDNF
8
Aerobic o Exercise-induced BDNF is dependent on injury severity
Exercise i.e. – moderate TBI = 30-36 days after injury
Program • Sub-symptom threshold programs should be considered in adolescent and adults
3
with symptoms persisting beyond 3 weeks
• Subthreshold aerobic exercise treatment has been shown to restore fMRI brain
8
activation patterns to normal vs a sham (stretching) program
• OSU’s Return to Activity Protocol – Refer to Appendix E
o Establish sub-symptom threshold with BCTT per physician recommendation
% HRmax at which BCTT was terminated
o Decrease % above by 15-20% = Prescribed HR
o Correlate Prescribed HR to Phase I-VI of OSU RTA Protocol
o Progress through phases as indicated by min to no symptom exacerbation
8
Patients who are more fit or athletes generally respond faster
• Physiological resolution of concussion = ability to exercise at 85-90% age-predicted
8
HRmax for 20 min without exacerbation of symptoms for several consecutive days
o Athletes must be cleared by their physician of record prior to return to
sport
1. Over the past week, my sleeping pattern has changed. ☐Yes ☐No If NO, skip to #2
a. Have you been taking naps during the middle of the day? ☐Yes ☐No
b. Are you waking during the night? ☐Yes ☐No
2. Over the past week, my participation in work or school has been % of what it would be
normally.
3. Over the past week, my participation in physical activity (sports, working out, etc.) has been
% of what it would be normally.
4. Do you feel like you are putting more effort more effort into maintaining schoolwork/grades and/or work
productivity? (Circle corresponding number below)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
No More Effort -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A Lot More Effort
Symptoms ______________________________________________________________________________
Prior to beginning the return to sport progression, the athlete must complete a period of cognitive and
physical rest – 24-48 hrs. Length of rest period will be determined by physician or appropriate medical
professional.
• Symptom checklist should be completed by athlete before and after each treatment/exercise
session
• If symptoms are elevated with exercise beyond permissible criteria, do not progress to next
phase. Return athlete to previous phase which did not elevate symptoms.
• Communication with physician required prior to advancing beyond day/phase 3.
If athlete is unable to progress through phase 5 after 14 days, athlete should be referred back to a
physician for additional multidisciplinary testing, and a Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Testing (BCTT)
may be considered
Light aerobic
Day/Phase 1
activity
(30-40% max HR) Target Heart Rate = ((max HR − resting HR) × %Intensity)
- 5 min warm up
- 15 min duration
Moderate aerobic Each cycle completed one time. Each exercise in cycle 1-2 performed for 30 sec
activity
Day/Phase 2
Cycle 1 Jog Squats Jog Push ups Jog Lunges Jog Bridges Jog 2 min rest
(40-60 % max HR)
- 5 min warm up Cycle 2 Jog Squats Jog Push ups Jog Lunges Jog Bridges Jog 2 min rest
- 15 min duration Single Leg Single Leg
Prone Plank
- 15 min circuit Cycle 3 balance on Right Balance on Left
(30 sec-1 min)
based exercise (30 sec) (30 sec)
Higher intensity Each cycle completed one time. Each exercise in cycle 1-2 performed for 30 sec
aerobic activity Lunge Box
(60-80% max HR) Cycle 1 Jog Hops Jog Skips Jog Jog Jog 2 min rest
hops Drill
Day/Phase 3
Return to practice Non-contact sport specific drills to tolerance: initiate harder training drills, agility and passing drills. May
Non-contact Drills start to progressive resistance training.
Each phase to last 1 to 2 weeks, all phases should be progressed to patient tolerance avoiding all concussion
signs and symptoms, patient should participate in monitored home program 6 days per week.
Modifier Choices
References
1. Alsalaheen BA, et al. Vestibular rehabilitation for dizziness and balance disorders after concussion.
JNPT. 2010; 34: 87-93.
2. Leddy JJ, Sandhu H, Sodhi V, Baker JG, Willer B. Rehabilitation of concussion and post-concussion
syndrome. Sports Health. 2012; 4(2): 147-154.
3. Ellis MJ, Leddy JJ, Willer B. Physiological, vestibulo-ocular and cervicogenic post-concussion disorders:
An evidence-based classification system with directions for treatment. Brain Injury. 2015; 29(2): 238-248.
4. Leddy JL, Baker JG, Merchant A, Picano J, Gaile D, Matuszak J, Willer B. Brain or strain? Symtpoms
alone do not distinguish physiologic concussion from cervical/vestibular injury. Clin J Sport Med. 2014: 1-
6.
5. Marshall S, Bayley M, McCullagh S, Velikonja D, Berrigan L. Clinical practice guidelines for mild traumatic
brain injury and persistent symptoms. Can Fam Physician. 2012; 58: 257-267.
http://onf.org/system/attachments/60/original/Guidelines_for_Mild_Traumatic_Brain_Injury_and_Persisten
t_Symptoms.pdf
6. Concussion Facts and Statistics. UPMC Sports Medicine. 2017. http://www.upmc.com/Services/sports-
medicine/services/concussion/Pages/facts-statistics.aspx.
7. Concussion Clinical Summaries. American Physical Therapy Association (APTA). 2015.
http://www.ptnow.org/ClinicalSummaries/CollectionDetail?resourceId=8d77866e-c1da-4556-acdc-
1dcb04ff206f.
8. Leddy J, Hinds A, Sirica D, Willer B. The role of controlled exercise in concussion management. PM R.
2016: 91-100.
9. Leddy JJ, Kozlowski K, Donnelly JP, Pendergast DR, Epstein LH, Willer B. A preliminary study of
subsymptom threshold exercise training for refractory post-concussion syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 2010;
20: 21-27.
10. Rouse MW, et al. Validity and reliability of the revised convergence insufficiency symptom survey in
adults. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2004; 24: 384-390.
11. Alsalaheen BA. Exercise prescription patterns in patients treated with vestibular rehabilitation after
concussion. Physiother Res Int. 2013; 18(2): 100-108.
12. Leddy JL, Baker JG, Kozlowski K, Bisson L, Willer B. Reliability of a graded exercise test for assessing
recovery from concussion. Clin J Sports Med. 2011; 21: 89-94.
13. Hunt T, Asplund C. Concussion assessment and management. Clin Apoera Med. 2010; 29: 5-17.
14. Leddy JJ, Willer B. Use of graded exercise testing in concussion and return-to-activity management.
ACSM. 2013; 12(6): 370-376.
15. Collins CL, Fletcher EN, Fields SK, Kluchurosky L, Rohrkemper MK, Comstock RD, Cantu RC. Neck
strength: a protective factor reducing risk for concussion in high school sports. J Primary Prevent. 2014;
35: 309-319.
16. Landel R. Cervicogenic Dizziness: An Evidence Based Competency Course. APTA
17. Chappel C, Dodge E, Dogbey GY. Assessing the immediate effect of osteopathic manipulation on sports
related concussion symptoms. Osteopathic Family Physician. 2015; 7(4): 30-35.
18. Leddy JJ, et al. Safety and prognostic utility of provocative exercise testing in acutely concussed
adolescents: a randomized trial. Clin J Sport Med. 2018; 28:13-20.
Vision Specialists
• Optometrist – Doctors of Optometry (OD) diagnose and treat vision problems, eye diseases and related
conditions, prescribe eyeglasses and contact lenses and provide medication to treat eye disorders. They
cannot perform surgery but often provide pre and post-surgical care.
• *It is important to refer neuro/concussion patients to an Optometrist who can provide a neuro-
optometric/sensorimotor evaluation, as not all Optometrists perform this type of assessment.
(See specialists on page 10).
• Ophthalmologist – MD who specializes in the medical and surgical care of the eyes and visual system and in
the prevention of eye disease and illness
• Neuro Ophthalmologist – Subspecialists of neurology and ophthalmology who address visual problems
related to the nervous system
Terminology
The 3 subsystems of version, vergence and accommodation must be precisely synchronized for efficient
oculomotor control during activities such as reading.
Accommodation The ability of the eye to change focus from distance to near objects, and is achieved by the
ciliary muscle adjusting the shape of the intraocular lens. Accommodative dysfunction may
result in Accommodative Insufficiency, Spasm (overstimulation), or Infacility (slowed)
Vergence Eye The simultaneous movement of both eyes, in opposite directions, as needed for single,
Movements binocular vision, and stereopsis. Stereopsis is binocular depth perception, as the two separate
images from each eye are successfully combined /fused into one image in the brain. Includes
convergence and divergence.
Binocular Strabismic - eyes are misaligned, may be Non-strabismic
Vision constant or intermittent • Esophoria – eyes have a tendency to turn in
Disorders • Esotropia – eyes turn in • Exophoria – eyes have a tendency to turn out
• Exotropia – eyes turn out • Hyperphoria – One eye has a tendency to turn up
• Hyper tropia – one eye turns up
Diplopia Double vision that suggests misalignment of the eyes. Occurs when the object at which the
individual is looking stimulates the fovea (part of the retina that contains the area of most acute
vision) of one eye, and a non-foveal part of the retina of the other eye.
Suppression A condition in which the visual system ignores the input from one eye, usually associated with
strabismus or amblyopia.
Versional Eye Saccades - fast, simultaneous eye movements Pursuits - eye movements that allow smooth,
Movements in the same direction, to change the fixation continuous viewing of a moving object, and
point. During visual scanning, as in reading, play a significant role in driving and sports.
the eyes make saccadic movements and stop
Pursuit dysfunction can include ataxia (jerky
several times, moving very quickly between
each stop. Saccadic dysfunction may include quality), and decreased velocity.
impaired velocity, accuracy, and or initiation of
eye movements (ocular motor apraxia)
Peripheral/ Allows awareness of position in space, and provides general information needed for balance,
Ambient Vision movement, coordination, and posture. Unstable ambient vision after BI may cause vertigo,
sensitivity to light and motion, and nausea. Also, having intact visual fields does not necessarily
correlate with intact peripheral awareness or intact central/peripheral vision integration.
Vestibulo- The VOR is one of the fastest reflexes in the human body. At least slight head movement is
Ocular reflex present all of the time, so the VOR is always important for gaze stabilization. Reflexive eye
(VOR) movements stabilize images on the retina during head movement by producing a compensatory
eye movement in the direction opposite to the head movement. In order to have clear vision,
head movements must be compensated for almost immediately. Individuals with VOR
impairment may complain of vision “looking like a photograph taken with a shaky hand”, or
seeing “trails”, dizziness, and imbalance.
Background
Subtle changes in brain function can occur even after mild TBI/Concussion. Approximately 80% of our perception,
23
learning, cognition and activities are mediated through vision, and greater than half of the circuits in the brain are
3
involved in vision , including many regions susceptible to shearing during head impacts. Visual system tests
probe higher cortical functioning, and assist in detecting functional changes in patients. Abnormal oculomotor and
binocular vision skills (ie convergence, accommodation, ocular muscle balance, saccades, and pursuits),
3,18,19,48,49
vestibular-ocular reflex, and subjective visual complaints are common following TBI, including mTBI .
Oculomotor dysfunction has been estimated to be as high as 90% in individuals with TBI, followed by
37,47
accommodative and convergence deficits . Further, early detection of vision abnormalities may predict
49
individuals at risk of more severe head impacts . Also, it is worth noting that approximately 95% of patients with
visual symptoms/complaints caused by TBIs have normal fundoscopic (exam of the retina) findings. An individual
can have normal acuity (ie 20/20), but still have impaired oculomotor or eye teaming skills, and therefore impaired
functional vision.
Incidence
Common • Blurred vision • Visual field impairments
visual • Difficulty with reading • Photosensitivity
impairments • Diplopia/eye strain • Color blindness
in first year • Dizziness or disequilibrium in visually
17
post-TBI crowded environments
Recommendations
(Radomski, 2014). A consensus panel of experts using a nominal group technique has recommended the
screening items below. These have been proposed as “better practice” for vision screening post-TBI with adults,
until a validated option becomes available for non-vision specialist clinicians. Items are to be performed in this
35
order. Assessments in italics can also be considered.
Recommendations (continued)
35,40
Motor Fusion • Near Point of Convergence
Testing/Eye 1. Use a 20/30 letter target, or pencil tip, placed just above the nose at the brow between
Alignment the eyes
Testing* 2. Move the target toward the patient at a rate of about 1-2cm/s, encouraging pt to keep
the target single
3. Measure the patient’s reported subjective break (target becomes double) in
centimeters
4. Then slowly move the target away from the eyes until reported subjective recovery
(single again). Measure in centimeters.
5. If the pt does not report diplopia (doubling of the target), the point at which the eyes are
observed to lose alignment, and then regain alignment, are recorded as the break and
recovery
6. If the eyes are observed to lose alignment and the patient does not report diplopia, this
may indicate suppression
*Norms – 5cm break and 7 cm recovery
35,43
• Eye Alignment test (options include the cover tests)
• Modified Thorington test, using the Bernell Muscle Imbalance Measure card tests (near
7,51
and far). http://www.bernell.com
16,35,39
Saccades • Developmental Eye Movement test
• Northeastern State University College Optometry Oculomotor Test (NSUCO) of saccades
27,35
* Should be trained by a vision specialist before performing fusion tests or accommodative tests.
Visual field impairment and cranial nerve injury is more likely to occur following
moderate or severe TBI.48
• mayfieldclinic.com/PE-VisualFieldTest.HTM
Three Cranial Nerves that Supply Innervation to the Six
Extraocular Muscles of Each Eye
• ebmedicine.net/topics.php?paction=showTopicSeg&topic_id=23&seg_id=417
SouthWest Eyecare
Michelle F. Miller, OD
4140 Hoover Rd.
Grove City, OH 43123
(614) 801-2020
Appendix A: Expected Amplitude of Accommodation by Age Expected
Number (D)
Age43 15 13
18 12
21 11
24 10
27 9
30 8
33 7
36 6
39 5
42 4
45 3
48 2
51 1
54 0
Rapid finger‐counting confrontation screening requires four responses from the patient (panels A through D). The
schematics are shown from the perspective of the clinician, with the patient's eye and covering hand shown in the
grey oval. The combinations of fingers shown are examples only, although the clinician must always present
either one or two fingers on each hand. A correct response from the patient is always ‘two’, ‘three’ or ‘four’ and
never ‘one’.
Author: Julie M. Omiatek, MS, OTR/L, CHT
Reviewers: Dr. Steven J Curtis, OD, FCOVD; Karen Rasavage, OTR/L; Michelle F. Miller, OD; Carol Gains,
OTR/L; Tierney Bumgardner, MOT, OTR/L
Completion date: July 2017
1. Anderson, A. et al. (2009). Rapid confrontation screening for peripheral visual field defects and extinction.
Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 92, 45-48.
2. Alghwiri, A. et al. (2012). The development and validation of the Vestibular Activities and Participation
Measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 93, 1822-31.
3. Berthold-Lindstedt, et al. (2017). Visual dysfunction is underestimated in patients with acquired brain injury.
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 49, 327-332.
4. Brayton-Chung, A. et al. (2016). Action: The role of occupational therapy in concussion rehabilitation. OT
Practice. 11-21-2016, 9-12.
5. Capo-Aponte, J. et al. (2012). Visual dysfunctions and symptoms during the subacute stage of blast-induced
mild traumatic brain injury. Mil Med. 177(7), 804-813.
6. Cate, Y. & Richards, L., (2000). Relationship between performance on tests of basic visual functions and
visual-perceptual processing in persons after brain injury. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy.
54(3), 326-334.
7. Cebrian, J. et al. (2014). Reapeatability of the modified Thorington card used to measure far heterophoria.
Optom Vis Sci. 91(7). 786-92.
8. Ciuffreda, KJ. (2002). The scientific basis for and efficacy of optometric vision therapy in nonstrabismic
accommodative and vergence disorders. Optometry. 73, 735-762.
9. Ciuffreda, KJ, et al. (2008). Vision therapy for oculomotor dysfunctions in acquired brain injury: A
retrospective analysis. Optometry. 79, 18-22.
10. Cohen, H. (2014). Use of the Vestibular Disorders Activities of Daily Living Scale to describe functional
limitations in patients with vestibular disorders. Journal of Vestibular Research. 24, 33-38.
11. Cooke, J and Zacko, C. (2014) Post-concussion Syndrome, Persistent Symptomatic Concussion, Related
Sequelae, and Treament of Mild Closed Head Injury (ch 22). Concussions in Athletics: From Brain to
Behavior. Springer Science + Business Media, New York
12. Daugherty, K. et al. (2007). Evaluating changes in quality of life after vision therapy using the COVD Quality
of Life Outcomes Assessment. Optometry and Vision Development. 38, 75-81.
13. Finn, C. & Waskiewicz, M. (2015). The role of occupational therapy in managing Post-Concussive Syndrome,
published by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc., Physical Disabilities Special Interest
Section Quarterly, 38(1), 1-4.
14. Galetta, K.M., et al. (2011). The King-Devick test and sports-related concussion: study of a rapid visual
screening tool in a collegiate cohort. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 309, 34-39.
15. Gallaway, M. et al. (2017). Vision Therapy for Post-Concussion Vision Disorders. Optom Vis Sci. 94(1), 68-
73.
16. Garzia, R. et al. (1990). A new visual –verbal saccade test: The Developmental Eye Movement test (DEM).
Journal of the American Optometric Association. 61(2), 124-135.
17. Greenwald, B. D., Kapoor, N., & Singh, A. D. (2012). Visual impairments in the first year after traumatic brain
injury. Brain Injury, 26, 1338–1359.
18. Goodrich, G., et al. (2007). Visual function in patients of a polytrauma rehabilitation center: A descriptive
study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development. 44(7), 929-936.
19. Goodrich, G. et al. (2013). Development of a mild traumatice brain injury-specific vision screening protocol: A
Delphi study. JRRD. 50(6). 757-768.
20. Han, Y., et al. (2004). Reading-related oculomotor testing and training protocols for acquired brain injury in
humans. Brain Research Protocols.14,1-12
21. Heitger, M. et al. (2009). Impaired eye movements in post-concussion syndrome indicate suboptimal brain
function beyond the influence of depression, malingering, or intellectual ability. Brain. 132; 2850-2870.
22. Hoyt, CS., (2007). Brain injury and the eye. Eye. 21, 1285-1289.
23. Kelts , E. (2010). The basic anatomy of the optic nerve and visual system (or, why Thoreau was wrong).
Neurorehabilitation. 27, 217-222.
24. Kelts, E. (2010). Traumatic brain injury and visual dysfunction: A limited overview. Neurorehabilitation. 27,
223-229.
25. Kapoor, N., et al. (2004). Oculomotor rehabilitation in acquired brain injury: A case series. Archives of
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 85, 1667-1678.
26. Lavrich, JB. (2010). Convergence insufficiency and its current treatment. Current Opinion in Opthalmology.
21(5), 356-360.
27. Maples WC. NSUCO Oculomotor test. Santa Ana, CA: Optometric Extension Program. 1995.
28. Marshall, S. et al. (2015). Updated clinical practice guidelines for concussion/mild traumatic brain injury and
persistent symptoms. Brain Injury. 29:6, 688-700.
29. Mueller, M. et al. (2015). Subscales of the Vestibular Activities and Participation questionnaire could be
applied across cultures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 68, 211-219.
30. Master, CL et al. (2015). Vision diagnoses are common after concussion in adolescents. Clinical Pediatrics.
July 7.
31. Padula, W. & Argyris, S. (2015). Post Trauma Vision Syndrome: Part I and Part 2, Traumatic Brain Injury
Resource Guide for the Centre for Neuro Skills.
32. Pearce, K. et al. (2015). Near Point of Convergence after a sport-related concussion: Measurement reliability
and relationship to neurocognitive impairment and symptoms. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 43(12),
3055-3061.
33. Politzer, T. & Lenahan, D. (2010). Double vision caused by neurologic disease and injury.
Neurorehabilitation. 27, 247-254.
34. Padula, W. et al. (2008). The need for optometric rehabilitation for our veterans who have incurred traumatic
brain injury – Senate Bill 1999/House Bill 3558. Optometry-Journal of the American Optometric Association -
Guest Editorial. 170-171.
35. Radomski, M. et al. (2014) Composition of a vision screen for service members with Traumatic Brain Injury:
Consensus using a modified nominal technique. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. July/August
2014, Vol. 68, 422-429.
36. Ripley, D. et al. (2010). The Vision Clinic: An interdisciplinary method for assessment and treatment of visual
problems after Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurorehabilitation. 27, 231-235.
37. Roberts, P. et al. (2016). A conceptual model for vision rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research &
Development (JRRD). 53(6). 693-704.
38. Rouse, M et al. (The CITT Investigator Group). (2009) Validity of the CISS: A confirmatory study. Optom Vis
Sci. 86(4). 357-63.
39. Richman, J.E. & Garzia, R. P. (2015). The Developmental Eye Movement test, version 2.5. South Bend, IN:
Bernell
40. Scheiman, M. et al. (2003). Nearpoint of Convergence: Test procedure, target selection, and normative data.
Optometry and Vision Science. 80(3). 214-225.
41. Scheiman, M & Wick, B (2007). Clinical Management of Binocular Vision: Heterophoric, Accommodative, and
th
Eye Movement Disorders, 4 ed., Wolters Kluwer.
42. Scheiman, M. et al. (2010). Vision therapy/orthoptics for symptomatic convergence insufficiency in children:
Treatment kinetics. Optom Vis Sci. 87(8), 593-603
43. Scheiman, M. et al. (2011). Understanding and Managing vision deficits: A guide for occupational therapists
rd
(3 ed). Thorofare , NJ: Slack.
44. Shin, H. et al. (2011). Effectiveness of vision therapy for convergence dysfunctions and long-term stability
after vision therapy. Opthalmic & Physiological Optics. 31, 180-189.
45. Thiagarajan, P. et al. (2011). Vergence dysfunction in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): a review. Opthalmic
Physiol Opt. 31: 456-68.
46. Thiagarajan, P. et al. (2014). Oculomotor neurorehabilitation for reading in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI):
An integrative approach. NeuroRehabilitation. 34:129-146.
47. Tjarks, B. et al. (2013). Comparison and utility of King-Devick and ImPACT composite scores in adolescent
concussion patients. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. (Article in Press)
48. Ventura, R. et al. (2014). The neuro-opthalmology of head trauma. Lancet Neurology. 13: 1006-16.
49. Ventura, R. et al. (2015). The Concussion Toolbox: The role of vision in the assessment of concussion.
Seminars in Neurology. 35, 599-606.
50. Warren, M. (1993). A hierarchical model for evaluation and treatment of visual perceptual dysfunction in adult
acquired brain injury, Part 1. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 47(1), 42-54.
51. Wong, E. et al. (2002). Interexaminer repeatability of a new, modified prentice card compared with
established phoria tests. Optom Vis Sci. 79(6). 370-5.
52. Zoltan, B. (2007). Vision, perception, and cognition: A manual for the evaluation and treatment of the adult
th
with acquired brain injury, 4 ed. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, Inc.
HIP ABDUCTOR
(GLUTEUS MEDIUS/MINIMUS) REPAIR
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Background
Gluteus medius and/or minimus partial- or full-thickness tears can be the source of significant functional
impairments and chronic peritrochanteric hip pain. These tears are similar in morphology to the soft tissue
anatomy of rotator cuff tears in the shoulder (Domb 2013). Often, gluteus medius and/or minimus tears do not
have a clear mechanism of injury; however, it is thought that the progression of these tears is gradual with
degradation that occurs within the musculotendinous junction and at its attachment to the bone. These changes
eventually cause insertional failure and tendinopathy that leads to partial undersurface tearing. Occasionally,
these tears progress to complete avulsion of the abductor attachment on the greater trochanter (Domb 2013).
Gluteus medius tears are more common than gluteus minimus tears and partial thickness tears are more common
than full thickness tears (Connell 2003). Lastly, women more commonly demonstrate symptomatic tears
compared to men (Tibor 2008). Many of these tears often go undiagnosed or misdiagnosed for a prolonged time.
Hip abductor repair is most commonly an open procedure in order to best expose the tissues and fully perform the
repair. Due to the nature of the repair, certain precautions must be taken early on during post-operative
rehabilitation in order to protect the repaired and healing tissues.
The surgical procedure involves an incision over the lateral aspect of the hip carried down to the iliotibial (IT)
fascia. The IT fascia is opened longitudinally and the trochanteric bursa is removed or debrided. The gluteal
tendons are then identified and cleaned. Anchors are placed into the greater trochanter and the stitches are used
to secure the gluteal tendons back to the bone. The IT fascia is partially closed with the extent of closure
dependent on presentation. The wound is closed through the deep soft tissues and the skin.
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics, and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Summary of Recommendations
Corrective • Proper activation and recruitment of all hip and core musculature without compensation
Interventions required prior to initiating strengthening
• Neuromuscular re-education for balance and correction of functional movement patterns
• Therapeutic exercise and neuromuscular re-education for LE strength (progressing from
DL to SL activities)
ROM/Manual • PROM as tolerated
Therapy o No hip flexion > 90° and no adduction past neutral/0° (6 wks)
• No AROM hip abduction, ER, or IR (6 wks)
Outcome • Pre-op, evaluation, 6 wks, and discharge
Testing o May increase frequency if warranted
• Hip Outcome Score (HOS)
o ADL (17 items)
o Sports (9 items)
Criteria for To Initiate Plyometric Program To Initiate Running Program
Progression • Full, functional, pain-free ROM • Pass all plyometric program criteria
• > 80% quadriceps, hamstring, and hip • Hop and hold with proper mechanics
(using hand-held dynamometer) strength (uninvolved à involved)
compared to uninvolved leg • Ability to tolerate 200-250 plyometric foot
• Squat > 150% BW (barbell squat or leg contacts without reactive pain/effusion
press) • No gross visual asymmetry and rhythmic
• 10 forward and lateral step downs from 8” strike pattern with treadmill or over
step with proper mechanics ground running
Criteria for • Physician clearance at last check-up • Patient reported outcome measures:
Return to • Strength: > 90% compared to uninvolved o Score ≥ 90% on HOS (ADL and
Sport/Discharge hip (using hand-held dynamometer) Sports subscales)
• > 90% BW with SL leg press ** Criteria for discharge from PT is less
• Functional Performance: rigorous for those not returning to sport.
o > 90% limb symmetry with SL hop for Ensure the patient is able to perform all
distance, SL triple crossover hop, and ADLs and recreational activities without
SL 6-meter timed hop (with pain, reactive effusion, and with
demonstration of proper LE landing appropriate functional mechanics.**
mechanics)
o Ability to complete sport-specific drills
with correct mechanics - at maximum
speed w/o pain
Abbreviations: AD, assistive device; ADLs, activities of daily living; AROM, active range of motion; BW, body
weight; DL, double leg; LE, lower extremity; PROM, OOB, out of bed; passive range of motion; pre-op, pre-
operative;
ROM, range of motion; SL, single leg; WB, weight bearing; wks, weeks
Phase I: Protection - Post-Op until D/C Assistive Device (0-6 weeks)
Phase II: D/C Crutches to Painfree with ADLs (6-8 Weeks)
Goals • Progress to full PROM and AROM in all directions
• Progressively improve strength of the proximal hip musculature (gluteals, iliopsoas, hip
rotators)
• Normalize postural/lumbopelvic control with DL and SL activities
• Normalize gait at preferred walking speed for community distances without AD
• Tolerate ADLs without pain or limitation
Precautions • Avoid soft tissue aggravation due to early/excessive progression of activity
o Soft tissue irritation suggests need for regression of activities and/or exercises
• Avoid aggressive stretching into hip adduction/IR/ER including ITB stretches
• Avoid running or impact activities
• Continually assess patient’s current activity level outside of PT
Crutch • 2 crutches or walker for 6 weeks
Progression • 2 à 1 crutch or caneà 0 recommended to slow patient progression, limit walking
distance, and reduce stress through repaired tissue
o 2 crutches à 0 recommended to promote normalized gait mechanics IF patient is
unable to demonstrate appropriate mechanics with 1 crutch or cane
Criteria for • Adequate hip ROM for normalized/pain free gait pattern (10° hip extension)
Ambulation • Normalized gait pattern without AD
Without o No Trendelenburg sign demonstrated during stance phase of gait
Assistive
Device
ROM/Stretching • Soft tissue and joint mobilization to achieve symmetrical PROM
• Upright bike, butterfly/reverse butterfly stretches
• May benefit from referral to massage therapist if patient is developing soft tissue
dysfunction/irritation (commonly affects TFL, adductors)
Therapeutic • DL squat, leg press, calf raises, forward/lateral step ups, 4 way hip (standing), SL balance
Exercise (focus on pelvic stabilization), bridge progression, quadruped progression (UE/LE lifts)
• Hip rotation AROM (ER/IR) with involved knee on stool
Cardiovascular • May progress time on upright bike as tolerated
Exercise • Ensure patient can perform 30 minutes with no resistance and without symptoms prior to
adding resistance
• Decrease time to ≤15 min when adding resistance
• Appropriate to recommend freestyle or backstroke swimming at end of phase II
o MUST use a pull buoy to allow legs to rest in a neutral position (no kicking allowed)
§ Use buoy at highest point between legs
Criteria to • Symmetrical and pain free hip ROM to meet the demands of patient’s activities
Progress to • Symmetrical DL squat to 70° of knee flex
Phase III • Score of 0-1 performing 10 repetitions of Active Hip Abduction Test (Appendix C)
• 10 repetitions of 8” step downs with good neuromuscular control
• Normalized gait pattern for community distances of ambulation
o No compensatory movement patterns at pelvis (no Trendelenburg sign)
Phase III: Painfree ADLs to Return to Impact Activities (8-12 Weeks)
Goals • Gradually progress gluteus medius/minimus strength and core/proximal hip stability
• Correct abnormal or compensatory movement patterns with functional tasks
• Optimize neuromuscular control, balance, and proprioception
• Increase volume and intensity of non-impact aerobic activities
Precautions • Avoid secondary muscle irritation (hip flexor and lateral hip)
• Monitor ROM, quality of movement, and activity level
ROM/Stretching • Maintain full AROM/PROM and progress through multidirectional end range movements
as required for vocational or recreational activities
• Use manual techniques including STM and joint mobilization as needed for soft tissue and
joint tightness
• Address any persistent lumbar or pelvic dysfunctions with manual or stretching
interventions
Therapeutic • Gradually progress gluteus medius/minimus strength
Exercise o Progressive resisted hip abduction and IR/ER strengthening in NWB and WB positions
• Continue progressive LE/core strength and stability
o Begin to address multiplanar movements near end of phase III
• Balance/Proprioception
o Rocker board, BOSU ball, SLS on foam pad
Cardiovascular • Upright Bike/Elliptical/Stairmaster Progression (see return to biking protocol)
Exercise o Gradually progress resistance and/or speed (cross ramp on elliptical) as tolerated
• Swimming Progression (see return to swimming protocol)
o Return to freestyle and backstroke kicking but NO use of kickboard
o May also return to elementary backstroke (slowly) and dolphin dives
Plyometrics • Criteria to initiate plyometric program
o Full, functional, pain-free ROM
o > 80% quadriceps, hamstring, and hip (using hand-held dynamometer) strength
compared to uninvolved leg
o Squat 150% BW (barbell squat or leg press)
o 10 forward and lateral step downs from 8” step with proper alignment (Appendix D)
• Progressive weight bearing, DL à SL demands
o Shuttle plyometrics (DL à SL)
o Forward hop and hold (uninvolved à involved)
o DL mini hops/place jumps
• Proper take off/landing mechanics emphasized à NO knee valgus, good pelvic stability,
soft/quiet landing with equal distribution of force
• Agility ladder can be initiated if appropriate form and tolerance to plyometrics
Return to Running
Walk/jog progression can be initiated towards end of phase if patient demonstrates:
General Guidelines
• 10 repetitions
st
• Proper gluteal muscle activation (gluteus maximus 1 ,
nd
hamstrings 2 )
• Leg extends 10° past neutral
• No compensatory movement patterns at pelvis (no
anterior pelvic tilt)
• No anterior hip pain
Appendix C: Active Hip Abduction Test
(A) Demonstration of the active hip abduction test from the starting
position
(B) Demonstration of good control of the pelvis in the frontal plane; this
would receive a score of 0. The alignment of lower extremities, pelvis
and trunk has not changed from the start position, and upper extremity
remains relaxed on the abdomen.
(C) Demonstration of poor control of the pelvis in the frontal plane; this
would receive a score of 3. The upper extremity is placed on the table to
prevent loss of balance, the pelvis has rotated forward and the top hip
has flexed and internally rotated.
Davis, AM, Bridge P, Miller J, Nelson-Wong, E. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the active hip abduction test. J
Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(12):953-960.
Appendix D: Forward Step Down Test
Arm strategy: subject uses an arm strategy in an attempt to recover 0-1 errors Good quality
balance (1 point) mechanics
Trunk movement: trunk leans right or left (1 point)
Pelvic plane: pelvis rotates or elevates on one side compared to
the other (1 point)
Knee position: knee deviates medially and the tibial tuberosity
crosses an imaginary vertical line over 2nd toe (1 point); knee
deviates medially and the tibial tuberosity crosses an imaginary 2-3 errors Medium quality
vertical line over medial boarder of the foot (2 points) mechanics
Balance: subject steps down on the uninvolved side or the subject’s
tested leg becomes unsteady (1 point)
Park K, Cynn H, Choung S. Musculoskeletal predictors of movement quality for the forward step-down test in
asymptomatic women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(7):504-510.
Authors: Chelseana Davis PT, DPT, SCS; Kathy Wayman, PT, DPT, SCS; Kate Glaws, PT, DPT, SCS; Joann
Walker, PT, DPT, SCS
Reviewers: John DeWitt, PT, DPT, SCS, AT, William Vasileff, MD; and John Ryan, MD
References
Connell DA, Bass C, Sykes CA, Young D, Edwards E. Sonographic evaluation of gluteus medius and minimus
tendinopathy. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13: 1339-1347.
Davis, AM, Bridge P, Miller J, Nelson-Wong, E. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the active hip abduction test. J
Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(12):953-960.
Dewitt, JD. Non-surgical/post-op management. Presented at: APTA’s NEXT Conference & Exposition; June 5,
2015; National Harbor, MD.
Domb BG, Dotser I, Giordano BD. Outcomes of endoscopic gluteus medius repair with minimum 2-year follow-up.
Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(5): 988-998.
Park K, Cynn H, Choung S. Musculoskeletal predictors of movement quality for the forward step-down test in
asymptomatic women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(7):504-510.
Tibor LM, Seklya JK. Current concepts: differential diagnosis of pain around the hip joint. Arthroscopy. 2008;
24(12): 1407-1421.
Tyler TF, Fukunaga T, Gellert J. Rehabilitation of soft tissue injuries of the hip and pelvis. Int J Sports Phys Ther.
2014;9(6):785-797.
GREATER TROCHANTERIC PAIN SYNDROME
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Disclaimer
This guideline is intended as an aid for clinicians treating patients diagnosed with greater trochanteric pain
syndrome, utilizing an evidence-based load management treatment strategy. Progression is time and criterion-
based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician evaluation. Contact Ohio State
Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Background
Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) has been defined as lateral hip pain to palpation of the
peritrochanteric region. The pain can radiate down the thigh and into the posterior hip, but rarely distal to the
knee. Previously, the cause of pain has been attributed solely to trochanteric bursitis. However, the origin of pain
can include the trochanteric bursa, gluteus medius and minimus tendons, and iliotibial band. MRI examination in
studies involving GTPS show trochanteric bursitis was an uncommon finding and was not found in isolation; when
15
found, bursal distension coexisted with gluteal pathology. Recent studies have shown gluteal tendinopathy to be
1
the primary cause of lateral hip pain. The greatest incidence of GTPS often occurs between the fourth and sixth
15
decades of life with a female to male ratio of 4:1.
Recent studies of gluteal tendinopathy demonstrate the deep undersurface fibers of the gluteal tendons
preferentially develop pathology and tears and yet are relatively stress-shielded from tensile load in the lower
1
ranges of hip abduction. They are exposed to high compressive loads in the ranges of hip adduction against the
1 1
bony insertion. Normal daily function of the hip is in the low ranges of abduction or slight hip adduction. These
compressed sides of the tendons adapt to form somewhat of a cartilaginous or atrophic area in response to a lack
15
of tensile load. This makes the tendon vulnerable to becoming symptomatic even with small changes in activity.
For this reason, tendinopathy can occur in the absence of a traditional overuse injury model and explains how
15
tendinopathy is more common in the older patients. Because the turnover rate of collagen decreases with
10
advancing age, it may take longer for older athletes to recover from tendinopathy. Compressive forces (not
solely tensile loads) may be at fault and need correction for treatment of GTPS.
A key determinant in rehabilitation progression of tendinopathy is whether or not a tendon reacts, or develops an
5
increase in pain that does not return to baseline pain level within 24 hours. Load management and prescribing
effective loading variables (duration, frequency, nature, magnitude, direction, and intensity is important in guiding
the rehabilitation process. Monitoring changes in pain and immediate adjustment of load is essential. The pain-
monitoring model includes use of an objective measure to assess pain intensity 0-10/10 to monitor exercise
progression. It is recommended to assess at the same time every day at home.
Progressive mechanical loading has been found to be an effective management strategy. Different modes of
strength training, including isometric, isotonic, isolated eccentric, and isokinetic can be used to control pain,
improve motor control, and enhance function in pathological tissue. Although traditional rehabilitation approaches
have focused on isolated eccentric tissue loading, recent literature suggests that isolated eccentric exercise may
not be a superior choice compared with other types of loading, particularly heavy-slow resistance (HSR) loading
4
(resistance performed up to an individual’s 6RM). In fact, eccentric-based exercise may contribute to worse
5
outcomes for an in-season athlete or be too high load for the tendon to tolerate to begin treatment. HSR loading
4
also has been found to promote better collagen turnover than isolated eccentric loading. Important throughout
rehabilitation, isometrics have been found to reduce pain while reducing cortical inhibition of muscles. Emerging
research is indicating the presence of changes in central pain processing, such as central sensitization, in some
cases of tendinopathy. Generally clinical management of tendinopathy should include aspects of load
management and education, progressive mechanical loading, treatment of kinetic chain deficits, and a graded
return to activity.
Summary of Recommendations
Risk factors • Sudden increase in activity
• Repetitive compressive/tensile loads
• Lumbopelvic and LE mechanics
• Female>40 years
Differential • Gluteal tendon tear
Diagnosis • Ischiofemoral impingement, quadratus femoris tear, piriformis syndrome
• Intra-articular hip pathology (hip OA, AVN, FAI/labral tear, SCFE)
• Stress fracture
• Lumbar/SI pathology
• Systemic disease (CA, RA)
Examination • Gait, posture (lumbopelvic), kinetic chain, functional movement assessment
• Lumbar/SI screen
• Special tests: 30 second SLS, resisted external derotation test, TTP over
• Greater trochanter, painful hip abductor MMT
• Outcome tools: VISA-G, HOOS, HOS
• Pain Reduction and Load Management (isometric loading and avoiding positions of
compression)- refer to appendix
• Isotonic Loading (Heavy-slow resistance through concentric-eccentric phases)
• Energy-Storage Loading (plyometric loading)
• Return to Activity/Sport
Phases of • Patient education regarding load management (Lateral hip precautions)
Progression • Gluteal isometric contractions with tendon in shortened positions
Interventions • Progressive muscle-tendon loading program
• Correction of kinetic chain deficits (emphasis on mechanics during gait and ADLs)
Criteria for • Full ROM/strength/power
Discharge • Pain-free resistance test, high load, in compressed positions
• Achieved patient goal(s)
• Proper long-term maintenance program implemented for self-management of symptoms
• RTS activity without reactive pain
Examination
Subjective Symptoms commonly attributed to GTPS include pain/difficulty with:
• lying on the ipsilateral side
• prolonged standing or walking
• climbing up or down stairs
• sit to stand transfers
• walking up/down hills or inclines
• sitting
Objective • MMT hip abduction/dynamometry
• Hip ROM
• Lumbar spine and SI screening
• Pain provocation with palpation to greater trochanteric region
• Examination of gait on level surfaces and stairs/examination of body mechanics with
transfers and sport-specific activity
• Lumbopelvic control during high and low level tasks
Special Tests • 30 second single leg stand test: Recommended for up to 30 seconds (or until onset of
greater trochanteric pain) allowing light fingertip support with trunk maintained in vertical
position. Although not part of the test, observing the patient’s ability to control the pelvis can
1
help guide treatment (Low load test)
3
• Lateral hip pain with resisted external derotation test
Patient: supine with hip Movement: Patient is asked to return the leg to the neutral hip
and knee passively flexed position against resistance of the clinicians hand at the ankle.
up to 90 degrees. Hip The test is positive when the lateral hip pain is reproduced.
passively placed into
external rotation. If any
pain is present in that
position, slightly decrease
the external rotation
position just enough to
relieve pain.
Clinician: standing just
to the side of the leg
being tested. One hand
supporting knee, other
hand at lateral ankle.
Outcome • In a recent study, maximum walking distance and ability to manipulate shoes and socks on
23
Study Harris Hip Score domains helped differentiate GTPS from hip osteoarthritis.
Classification
Tendinopathy has been described as a continuum of tissue pathology, which can be classified as reactive,
18
degenerative, or reactive-on-degenerative phases.
• Reactive tendinopathy is a non-inflammatory proliferative response in the cell and matrix. It is usually a
result of a burst of unaccustomed physical activity and is more common in a younger person. At this
stage, it remains possible for the tendon to regain its normal structure with optimal management.
Treatment at this stage should be aimed at improving the load capacity of the area of aligned fibrillar
structure through a progressive loading program. Unloading or performing heavy load, eccentric exercise
could cause deleterious effects in this stage.
• Degenerative tendinopathy demonstrates progression of both matrix and cell changes. There is little
capacity for reversibility of pathological changes at this stage. Progressive loading does not necessarily
result in a restructure of the matrix.
• Reactive-on-degenerative describes the concept of some areas of the tendon may be in different stages
of tendinopathy at the same time. Structurally normal areas of the tendon may be vulnerable to reactive
tendinopathy concurrent with other areas in the tendon in the degenerative phase. Treatment strategies
should be directed at optimizing adaptation of the tendon as a whole.
Corrective Interventions
Patient education in reducing compression (including postural changes to sitting and sleeping posture, transfers
and exercise) for reducing hip adduction:
• Avoid lying on affected side (change to supine with pillow under knees or ¼ position from prone)
• Avoid crossing legs
• Avoid piriformis, ITB, and adduction stretching
• Avoid standing and “hanging” on one hip (uneven LE weight bearing)
• Avoid running on uneven surfaces/hills and improve lumbopelvic stability
Indications 1. Patient experiences reactive pain (More than 3/10 pain during or after activity/isotonic
loading that lasts greater than 24 hours). Range of acceptable pain levels may vary
dependent on patient tolerance and understanding of therapeutic ranges
2. Unable to maintain current activity levels due to pain
3. Localized tenderness at tendon
4. Pain with single leg standing test and external derotation test
5. Pain lying on affected side
Activity 1. Patient education in reducing compressive forces on the tendon (including no end-range
Modifications stretching) and the pain-monitoring model
expert opinion 2. Reduced loading and modified volume of activity
3. Patient Education: expected recovery progression, cognitive behavioral therapy if indicated
4. If indicated, use of crutch or STC for load management and gait normalization
5. Cross training with biking, swimming, as tolerated
6. Increase in night pain may indicate load was too high and needs to be adjusted
Treatment of
1. Correction of kinetic chain deficits and restore active trunk stability
Kinetic Chain
2. Functional retraining in weight-bearing double-leg and single-leg tasks with emphasis on
Impairments
avoiding hip adduction during dynamic tasks.
expert opinion
Criteria to 1. Can complete isotonic loading with minimal reactive pain (<3/10 pain or no increase in
Progress to baseline pain lasting longer than 24 hours)
Phase 2 2. Decreased pain with ADLs
expert opinion 3. Normalized gait
Phase II: Isotonic Loading Progression
Heavy, Slow Prescription: 3-4 sets of concentric-eccentric exercise starting at 15 repetitions and
Resistance progressing to 6 repetitions, performed every other day
Exercise
(HSR) *Initially, complete exercise in modified ROM (avoiding hip adduction) to avoid
strong level compression of tendon then progress into full ROM as strength and pain levels allow
evidence Suggested exercises: upright skating, skating in squat, sidestepping, band side glide,
bridges, clamshells, and side lying hip abduction. (See appendix)
Stretching End-range stretching to address ROM deficits (avoid stretching ITB and piriformis)
exercises
low level
evidence
Heavy, Slow Prescription: 3-4 sets of concentric-eccentric exercise starting at 15 repetitions and
Resistance progressing to 6 repetitions, performed every other day
strong level
evidence *Initially, complete exercise in modified ROM to avoid compression of tendon then
progress into full ROM as strength and pain levels allow
Criteria to 1. Able to complete energy storage exercises with minimal pain and at a volume that
Progress to would replicate the demands of the sport/activity
Phase 4 2. Proper long-term maintenance implemented for self-management of symptoms
expert opinion
Sport/ Reintegration into competition (no greater than every three days initially)
Activity-
Specific
Drills
expert opinion
Heavy, Slow Prescription: 3-4 sets of concentric-eccentric exercise starting at 15 repetitions and
Resistance progressing to 6 repetitions, performed at least twice per week
strong level
evidence *Initially, complete exercise in modified ROM to avoid compression of tendon then
progress into full ROM as strength and pain levels allow
Prolonged Perform with tendon in shortened/non-compressed/midrange position. This is done as
Isometric needed at this phase for pain management.
Contractions
strong level Prescription: 5 repetitions of 45-60 seconds, 2-3 times per day, progressing from 40% to
evidence 70% maximal voluntary contraction. 1-2 minute rest periods between contractions. Daily.
Failing to maintain a customary level of mechanical loading will result in a rapid tissue-specific shift
towards catabolic activity. It is vital to emphasize the importance in the off-season management
because tendons require a certain level of load maintenance. Continuing the loading program to
prevent reduction in tendon integrity and stiffness is important.
Authors: Ann-Marie Walters, PT, cert MDT; Robin A. Sopher, PT, DPT; J.J. Kuczynski, PT, DPT, OCS
Reviewer: Kate Glaws, PT, DPT, SCS; John Ryan, MD
Date: July 12, 2017
References
1. Allison K, Wrigley T et al. Kinematics and Kinetics During Walking in Individuals with Gluteal Tendinopathy. Clinical
Biomechanics. 2016; 32: 56-63
2. Almekinders LC, Weinhold PS and Maffulli N. Compression Etiology in Tendinopathy. Clin Sports Medicine. 2003; 22
(4);703-10
3. Bird PA, Oakley SP, Shnier R and Kirkham BW. Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Physical
Examination Findings in Patients with Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2001; 44 (9): 2138-145
4. Malliaras P, Cook J, Purdam c, Rio E. Patellar Tendinopathy: Clinical Diagnosis, Load Management, and Advice for
Challenging Case Presentations. JOSPT. 2015; 45:887-897.
5. Collee G, Dijkmans BA et al. Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (Trochanteric Bursitis) in Low Back Pain. Scand. J.
Rheumatol. 1991; 20 (4): 262-6
6. Cook JL, Purdam CR. Is Compressive Load a Factor in the Development of Tendinopathy? Br J of Sports Med. 2012; 46
(3): 163-8
7. Cook JL, Purdam CR. Is Tendon Pathology a Continuum? A Pathology Model to Explain the Clinical Presentation of Load-
Induced Tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2009; 43 (6): 409-16
8. Cook JL, Purdam CR. The Challenge of Managing Tendinopathy in Competing Athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2014; 48(7):506-
9
9. Cook JL, Rio E, Purdam CR and Docking SI. Revisiting the Continuum Model of Tendon Pathology:What is its Merit in
Clinical Practice and Research? Br J of Sports Med. 2016; 50(19): 1187-91
10. Del Buono A, Papalia R et al. Management of the Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Br. Med.
Bull. 2012; 102 (1): 115-131
11. Fearon AM, Ganderton C. Development and Validation of a VISA Tendinopathy Questionnaire for Greater Trochanteric
Pain Syndrome, the Visa-G. Manual Therapy. 2015; 1-9
12. Fearon AM, Scarvell JM, Neeman T, Cook JL, Cormick W and Smith PN. Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: Defining
the Clinical Syndrome. Br J Sports Med. 2013; 47(10): 649-53
13. Fearon AM, Stephens S, Cook JL et al. The Relationship of Femoral Neck Shaft Angle and Adiposity to Greater
Trochanteric Pain Syndrome in Women. A Case Control Morphology and Anthropometric Study. Br J Sports Med. 2012; 46;
888-92
14. Grimaldi A and Fearson A. Gluteal Tendinopathy: Integrating Pathomechanics and Clinical Features in its Management.
JOSPT. 2015; 45 (11): 910-22
15. Hart DA, Scott A. Getting the Dose Right When Prescribing Exercise for Connective Tissue Conditions; the Yin and the
Yang of Tissue Homeostasis. 2012; 46 (13):953
16. Lequesne M, Mathieu P et al. Gluteal Tendinopathy in Refractory Greater Trochanter Pain Syndrome: Diagnostic Value of
Two Clinical Tests. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2008; 59 (2): 241-246
17. Naugle KM, Fillingim RB, Riley JL. A Meta-Analytic Review of the Hypoalgesic Effects of Exercise. The Journal of Pain.
2012; 13(12); 1139-1150
18. Rio E, Van Ark M, Docking S et al. Isometric Contractions are More Analgesic than Isotonic Contractions for Patellar
Tendon Pain: An in Season Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin J Sport Med. 2017; 27(3) 253-9
19. Scott A, Backman L et al. Tendinopathy- Update on Pathophysiology. JOSPT. 2015; 45 (11) 833-841.
20. Scott A, Docking S. et al. Sports and Exercise-Related Tendinopathies: A Review of Selected Topical Issues by
Participants of the Second International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium. Br J Sports Med. 2013; 47 (12): 774
21. Silbernagel KG, Crossley KM. A proposed Return to Sport Program for Patients with Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy:
Rationale and Implementation. JOSPT. 2015;45 (11): 876-86
22. Tyler T, Fukunaga T, Gellert J. Rehabilitation of Soft Tissue Injuries of the Hip and Pelvis. Int J. Sports Phys. Ther. 2014;
9(6): 785-797
23. Van Ark M et al. Do Isometric and Isotonic Exercise Programs Reduce Pain in Athletes with Patellar Tendinopathy In-
Season? A Randomised Clinical Trial. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2016; 19 (9): 702-706
24. OSU Tendinopathy. J.J. Kuczynski, PT, DPT
Appendix A: Activities to Avoid/Change
The structures at the side of your hip have increased Irritation or pain at the side of your hip will delay tissue
compression when your hips are flexed over 90⁰ and healing, and the pain cycle will continue. Modifying your
when you cross your leg past the midline of your activities is necessary to allow for healing to occur. It is
body. This compression causes pain and irritation to important you follow these changes to notice a decrease
occur. in your symptoms, and to eventually alleviate pain.
HIP ARTHROSCOPY/
FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT
OSTEOPLASTY/LABRAL REPAIR
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of intra-articular hip pathology and secondary
hip osteoarthritis. There are three types of FAI: pincer impingement (excessive prominence of the
anterolateral rim of the acetabulum), cam impingement (overgrowth of the femoral head rotating inside
the acetabulum) and a combination of pincer and cam impingements (Byrd, 2010). The abnormal
abutment of the proximal femur against the rim of the acetabulum produced by the FAI causes limitations
in range of motion and produces shear forces that lead to hip dysfunction, chondral abrasion,
delamination/labral injuries, and eventually, full-thickness cartilage loss. The natural history of this
impingement process is initially acetabular cartilage injury, which is followed by labral injury and ultimately
joint arthrosis (Edelstein, 2012).
Hip arthroscopy allows for a minimally invasive procedure to correct the offending bony lesions.
Osteoplasty is performed to reshape the impingement lesion on the femoral and/or acetabular side
(removing either the non-spherical portion of the femoral head and/or resection of the anterior acetabular
over-coverage). Labral repairs are performed, if possible, to avoid disruption of joint mechanics and
abnormal distribution of forces around the joint. Anchors are placed on the rim of the acetabulum and the
suture is passed through the labrum and around the split portion, and then the labral tissue is re-
approximated (Enseki, 2006).
Summary of Recommendations
Return to Running
Walk/jog progression can be initiated towards end of phase if patient demonstrates:
General Guidelines
References
Byrd JW. Femoroacetabular impingement in athletes, part 1: cause and assessment. Sports Health.
2010. 2; 4: 321-333.
Bruno P. The importance of diagnostic test parameters in the interpretation of clinical test findings: the
prone hip extension test as an example. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2011;55(2):69-75.
Davis, AM, Bridge P, Miller J, Nelson-Wong, E. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the active hip
abduction test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(12):953-960.
Dewitt, JD. Non-surgical/post-op management. Presented at: APTA’s NEXT Conference & Exposition;
June 5, 2015; National Harbor, MD.
Edelstein J, Ranawat A, Enseki KR, Yun RJ, Draovitch P. Post-operative guidelines following hip
arthroscopy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5(1):15-23.
Enseki KR, Kohlrieser D. Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy: an evolving process. Int J Sports Phys
Ther. 2014;9(6):765-773.
Enseki KR, Martin RL, Draovitch P, et al. The hip joint: arthroscopic procedures and postoperative
rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006. 36; 7: 516-525.
Garrison JC, Osler MT, Singleton SB. Rehabilitation after arthroscopy of an acetabular labral tear. N Am J
Sports Phys Ther. 2007;2(4):241-50.
Garrison JC, Shanley E, Thigpen C, et al. The reliability of the Vail Sport Test™ as a measure of physical
performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(1):20-30
Grzybowski JS, Malloy P, Stegemann C, Bush-Joseph C, Harris JD, Nho SJ. Rehabilitation following hip
arthroscopy—a systematic review. Front Surg. 2015;2(21):1-10.
Park K, Cynn H, Choung S. Musculoskeletal predictors of movement quality for the forward step-down
test in asymptomatic women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(7):504-510.
Tyler TF, Fukunaga T, Gellert J. Rehabilitation of soft tissue injuries of the hip and pelvis. Int J Sports
Phys Ther. 2014;9(6):785-797.
Wahoff M, Dischiavi S, Hodge J, & Pharez JD. Rehabilitation after labral repair and femoroacetabular
decompression: criteria-based progression through the return to sport phase. Int J Sports Phys Ther.
2014;9(6):813-826.
• 10 repetitions
• Proper gluteal muscle activation (gluteus maximus
st nd
1 , hamstrings 2 )
• Leg extends 10° past neutral
• No compensatory movement patterns at pelvis (no
anterior pelvic tilt)
• No anterior hip pain
(A) Demonstration of the active hip abduction test from the starting
position
(B) Demonstration of good control of the pelvis in the frontal plane; this
would receive a score of 0. The alignment of lower extremities, pelvis
and trunk has not changed from the start position, and upper extremity
remains relaxed on the abdomen.
(C) Demonstration of poor control of the pelvis in the frontal plane; this
would receive a score of 3. The upper extremity is placed on the table to
prevent loss of balance, the pelvis has rotated forward and the top hip
has flexed and internally rotated.
Davis, AM, Bridge P, Miller J, Nelson-Wong, E. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the active hip
abduction test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(12):953-960.
Arm strategy: subject uses an arm strategy in an attempt to recover 0-1 errors Good quality
balance (1 point) mechanics
Trunk movement: trunk leans right or left (1 point)
Pelvic plane: pelvis rotates or elevates on one side compared to
the other (1 point)
Knee position: knee deviates medially and the tibial tuberosity
crosses an imaginary vertical line over 2nd toe (1 point); knee
deviates medially and the tibial tuberosity crosses an imaginary 2-3 errors Medium quality
vertical line over medial boarder of the foot (2 points) mechanics
Balance: subject steps down on the uninvolved side or the subject’s
tested leg becomes unsteady (1 point)
Park K, Cynn H, Choung S. Musculoskeletal predictors of movement quality for the forward step-down
test in asymptomatic women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(7):504-510.
Single Leg Squat (Goal: 3 minutes): subject must perform each repetition at a cadence of 1 second up
and 1 second down against resistance of a sportcord (placed under the foot of the leg that the test is
being performed on).
Lateral Bounding (Goal: 90 seconds): subject performs a lateral hopping motion against resistance of a
sportcord attached to the subject’s waist via a belt and on the other end to an immoveable object that is
level with the waist. The injured leg is positioned as the inside leg or the leg closest to the wall. The
patient is instructed to hop from one leg to the other (leg length distance), absorbing energy while they
land by bending at the knee and hip. Landing boundaries (distance of the hop) are demarcated on the
floor with two pieces of tape, one of which begins at the point of resistance of the sportcord as it is
stretched away from the wall and the other is the measured distance of the subject’s leg length from the
first piece of tape.
st nd rd
Yes (1) No (0) 1 30 2 30 3 30
seconds seconds seconds
Backward Jogging (goal: 2 minutes): subject performs backward jogging against resistance of the
sportcord with the belt around waist. The patient is instructed to hop from one leg to the other in an up
and down manner (similar to jogging in place) while using proper form and absorbing energy with each
landing by bending at the knee and hip.
Garrison JC, Shanley E, Thigpen C, et al. The reliability of the Vail Sport Test™ as a measure of physical
performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(1):20-30.
HIP MICROFRACTURE
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Overview
•
Avoid aggravation of inflammatory response, protect fibrocartilage formation
•
All progression based on soft tissue healing response
•
Weightbearing
o Non-weightbearing first six weeks or per physician’s recommendations
o Discontinue assistive device as gait mechanics normalize
Range of • Flexion within pain-free range and no anterior impingement
Motion • Anterior Repair
o Extension and external rotation within pain-free range and no overpressure
• Posterior Repair
o Flexion, adduction and internal rotation within pain-free range and limit overpressure
• Utilize both weightbearing and non weight bearing mobility techniques
• Chondroplasty procedure follow same parameters
Bracing • No post-operative bracing unless indicated by surgeon
Weeks 0-2 • Passive hip circumduction: First post-op visit until gait is normal and pain free
o 3 minutes clockwise/counterclockwise each at slight flexion (6 total minutes)
o 3 minutes clockwise/counterclockwise each at 70º flexion (6 total minutes)
• “Belly time”: lie prone for 20 minutes, twice daily
• Ankle Pumps
• Glut, quad, hamstring, transverse abdominus isometrics
• Stationary bike with minutes resistance (1/2 revolutions, progressing to full)
• Active assisted ROM all directions avoid anterior impingement with IR and flexion.
• Passive ROM log rolling IR/ER
• Heel slides
• Quadruped rocking
• Hip abduction/adduction isometrics
• Prone IR/ER isometrics
Weeks 7-12 • Stationary bike with resistance • Advanced bridging (double leg to single
• Elliptical leg, Swiss Ball)
• Stairclimber • Pelvic stability exercise
• Manual long axis distraction (gradual) • Side planks
• Manual A/P mobilizations – emphasis on • Side steps
posterior • Lateral stepdowns
• Mini squats to 45 degrees • Partial single leg squats
• Single leg stance (progress from stable to
unstable surfaces)
Criteria to 1. Full ROM
Progress to 2. Pain free, normal gait pattern
Phase III 3. Hip flexion strength > 60% of the uninvolved side
4. Hip add, abd, ext, IR, ER strength > 70% of the uninvolved side
Phase III: Advanced Rehabilitation
Goals 1. Restoration of muscular endurance and strength
2. Restoration of cardiovascular endurance
3. Improvement of coordination, balance and neuromuscular control
References
Enseki, KR, Martin, RL, Draovich P, Kelly BT, Philoppon MJ, and Schenker ML. The hip joint: arthroscopic
procedures and postoperative rehabilitation. JOSPT. 2006; 36(7):516-525.
Stalzer S., Wahoff M, Scanlan M. Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2006; 25:
337-357.
Smith GD, Knutsen G, Richardson JB. A clinical review of cartilage repair techniques. The Journal of Bone and
Joint Surgery. 2005; 87(4): 445-449.
Lienert JJ, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR, Philippon MJ, Sekiya JK. Microfracture techniques in hip arthroscopy.
Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2005; 15: 267-272.
Crawford K, Philippon MJ, Sekiya JK, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR. Microfracture of the hip in athletes. Clinics in
Sports Medicine. 2006; 25: 327-335.
Rehabilitation Precautions
• Non-weight bearing without bracing for 2 weeks. Toe-touch weight bearing Weeks 2-4
• No terminal/end-range hamstring stretching for 6 weeks
• Avoid long-sitting position for 6 weeks
• No isolated isotonic hamstring strengthening for 8 weeks
Goals to 1. Full hip, knee, and ankle PROM in protected positions, avoiding lengthened hamstrings
Progress to 2. Good quad control in non-weight bearing position
Next Phase 3. Continue pain and inflammation control
Phase V: • Full hamstring and quad strengthening program, per patient tolerance
Weeks 8- • Progress bilateral to unilateral, eccentric to concentric for hamstring strengthening
• Advanced core strength and stabilization program
12 • Include single knee balance activities on BOSU
• Bridging, Swiss ball bridging
• Advanced dynamic proprioceptive activities
• Initiate partial weight bearing plyometrics on shuttle or Total Gym
• Resisted ambulation, all directions, with cable-column or resistance bands – use
caution with resisted forward ambulation due to increased hamstring activation
Week 12 • Progress to FWB hop-downs, light, per patient tolerance
• Begin with 1 to 2 inch height box/step. Progress slowly to higher step. Progress from
bilateral to unilateral.
• Lunges: Forward and retro
• Slide Board
Goal 1. Perform hop-downs with appropriate mechanics, no evidence of dynamic instability, and
without symptom increase in order to progress difficulty and/or intensity.
References
Colosimo AJ, Wyatt HM, Frank KA, Mangine RE: Hamstring Avulsion Injuries. Oper Tech Sports Med (2005);
13:80-88
Brueker PU, Imhoff AB: Functional assessment after acute and chronic complete ruptures of the proximal
hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2005); 13: 411-418
Clanton TO, Coupe KJ: Hamstring Strains in Athletes: Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (1998);
6:237-248
O Mohamed et al: Relationship between wire EMG activity, muscle length, and torque of the hamstrings. Clinical
Biomechanics (2002); 17: 569-579
Lempainen L, Sarimo J, Heikkila J, Mattila K, Orava S: Surgical treatment of partial tears of the proximal origin of
the hamstring muscles. Br J Sports Med (2006); 688-691
Sherry MA, Best TM: A comparison of 2 rehabilitation programs in the treatment of acute hamstring strains. J of
Orth Sp Phys Ther (2004); 34:3: 116-125
Overview
Total hip arthroplasty (THA), also known as a total hip replacement is an elective surgical procedure to treat
patients who experience pain and dysfunction from an arthritic hip joint. THA is an effective option if the patient’s
pain does not respond to conservative treatment and has caused a decline in their health, quality of life, or ability
to perform activities of daily living. This procedure removes the arthritic structures that make up the hip joint and
replaces them with artificial implants. The head of the femur, which makes up the ball of the hip joint, is removed
and replaced by a smooth ball with a stem fixed within the femur. The acetabulum, which makes up the socket
portion of the hip joint, is fitted with a metal socket with a smooth inner lining. Once in place, the artificial pieces
allow improved function of the hip joint.
With advancements in modern medicine, there have been several effective surgical approaches developed for
THA, including anterior, posterior, anterolateral, posterolateral, and lateral approaches. The surgeon will
determine the best surgical approach to use for each individual. For each approach, there are different
precautions that must be followed to decrease risk of dislocation based on the tissues that were affected during
surgery. Patients are encouraged to participate in early mobilization while adhering to precautions in order to
improve function and limit post-operative complications.
Phase I: Day 1 Post-Op until D/C of Assistive Device (0-6 weeks)
Phase II: D/C AD to Pain Free ADLs (6-12 weeks)
Phase III: Pain Free ADLs to Return to Recreational Activities (12-20 wks)
This phase is only required for patients who wish to participate in recreational sport outside of general
therapeutic exercise. Patients who don’t plan on sport participation can be discharged with maintenance
program following completion of phase II.
Goals • Correct abnormal/compensatory movement patterns with higher level multi directional
strengthening activities
• Optimize neuromuscular control/balance/proprioception
• Increase volume/intensity of aerobic activities; begin to restore low impact and sport specific
cardiovascular fitness
• Initiate progressive plyometric activities (per clearance of physician)
• Progressively return to sport or prior/desired level of function
Precautions • Avoid sacrificing quality for quantity during strengthening
• Avoid hip flexor/adductor inflammation as activity increases
• Ensure patient maintains full flexibility and painfree ROM as strength continues to increase
• Avoid aggressive stretching within this phase unless significant hypomobility noted
• Closely monitor return to sport progression
ROM/ • ROM should be checked periodically to ensure that loading the hip with new exercises does
Stretching not alter neuromuscular response and normal joint mechanics
• If full ROM is not achieved by week 12, terminal stretches should be initiated
Therapeutic • Continue progressive LE/core strengthening: Slow to fast, simple to complex, stable to
Exercise unstable, low to high force
• DL to SL strengthening, for leg press and other closed chain exercises
• Progress core stability tasks with emphasis on rotational and side-support tasks (Side
planks, cable crossovers, kneeling chops/lifts, plank over BOSU ball)
• LE strengthening tasks with multi-planar movements: Emphasize core stability and hip/knee
control (no valgus) during these tasks
• Proprioception: Vary surfaces, add perturbations, include variety of positions
• Aquatic therapy: may begin free style swimming once full ROM is achieved
Cardio- • Dynamic warm-up initiated
vascular • Upright Bike/Elliptical Progression (see return to biking protocol)
Exercise • Progress resistance (and cross ramp on elliptical) as tolerated
• Swimming Progression (see return to swimming protocol)
• Can begin freestyle kick; continue to avoid rotational kicks
Plyometrics High impact activities such as plyometrics are generally not advised following total joint
replacements. First priority following these surgeries is to prevent damage to the new artificial
joint. Due to lack of evidence on how high impact activities affect the integrity of artificial joint
replacement, patients are advised to participate low impact exercises. Patients considering
plyometrics with the intention of resuming running should consult with their physician.
• Criteria to initiate plyometric program
• Full, functional, pain-free ROM
• > 80% quadriceps, hamstring, and hip (using hand-held dynamometer) strength
compared to uninvolved leg
• Squat 150% BW (barbell squat or leg press)
• 10 forward and lateral step downs from 8” step with proper alignment (Appendix A)
• Progressive weight bearing, DL à SL demands
• Shuttle plyometrics (DL à SL)
• Forward hop and hold (uninvolved à involved)
• DL mini hops/place jumps
• Proper take off/landing mechanics emphasized à NO knee valgus, good pelvic stability,
soft/quiet landing with equal distribution of force
• Modified agility work can be initiated if appropriate form/tolerance to activity in progressive
plyometrics
Running • See appendix B (only for appropriate patients)
References
Enloe, L. J., Shields, R. K., Smith, K., Leo, K., & Miller, B. (1996). Total Hip and Knee Replacement Treatment
Programs: A Report Using Consensus. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy,23(1), 3-11.
doi:10.2519/jospt.1996.23.1.3
Kornuijt, A., Das, D., Sijbesma, T., & Weegen, W. V. (2016). The rate of dislocation is not increased when minimal
precautions are used after total hip arthroplasty using the posterolateral approach. The Bone & Joint Journal,98-
B(5), 589-594. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.98b5.36701
Monaghan, B., Grant, T., Hing, W., & Cusack, T. (2012). Functional exercise after total hip replacement
(FEATHER) a randomised control trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,13(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-237
Nankaku, M., Ikeguchi, R., Goto, K., So, K., Kuroda, Y., & Matsuda, S. (2016). Hip external rotator exercise
contributes to improving physical functions in the early stage after total hip arthroplasty using an anterolateral
approach: A randomized controlled trial. Disability and Rehabilitation,38(22), 2178-2183.
doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1129453
Total Hip Replacement: How Long Does It Take to Recover? (2011). Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical
Therapy,41(4), 240-240. doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.0502
Park K, Cynn H, Choung S. Musculoskeletal predictors of movement quality for the forward step-down test in
asymptomatic women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(7):504-510.
General Guidelines
Background
Achilles tendon repair is performed after injury occurs to the Achilles tendon. The injury is often accompanied by
an audible and palpable pop, with limited ability to push off of the injured limb. Repair is typically carried out
within 2 weeks of the injury, and recovery is expected to take between 6 to 9 months, and return to athletics may
take 9-12 months depending on the severity of injury and nature of sport.
Summary of Recommendations
Risk Factors • Exceeding ROM goals
• Age (30-50 years)
• Male
• Fluoroquinolone use
Outcome • FAAM
Testing
Manual • Recommend starting post-op week 1 PROM and soft issue mobilization
therapy • DF PROM to minimal stretch, DO NOT AGGRESSIVELY STRETCH
• PF PROM as tolerated
• Subtalar, midfoot and forefoot mobilizations as tolerated
Criteria for • D/C boot for shoe: After pt in neutral weight bearing, can wear shoe and able to walk
discharge without limp
• Return to running: 5 x 25 single leg calf raises, 95% symmetry ROM (DF/PF), 95%
symmetry calf circumference at 10 cm distal to tibial tubercle (Saxena 2011)
• Return to sports: 90% symmetry SL hop testing (check current concepts course), 90%
symmetry Y balance (anecdotal experience)
Phase I
Weeks 0-2 • Maintain post-operative splint • Recommended exercises (pain-free)
Protection • Manual therapy: Accessory joints o Toe wiggles
• Gait: WBAT in splint starting post-op week 1, o Doming
with crutches o Towel crunches
o 3 heel wedges o Ankle AROM/alphabets
Phase II
Weeks 2-6 • Walker boot, begin weaning from heel lift (1 lift every 2 weeks as tolerated)
Return to • Mobility: Active ROM up to 15° plantar flexion (PF) without boot)
Walking • Initiate ankle strengthening in protected positioning
After 2 weeks After 4 weeks
o Isometrics all planes o Active ROM up to 10° PF without boot
o Active plantar flexion with light t-band o 4 way t-band, PF up to 10°
in up to 15° o Seated heel raise with light weight
o Sitting heel raises – no weight bearing o Initiate balance/proprioception training
o 4 way straight leg raise on stable surface once pt can
o Bicycle for ankle ROM in boot comfortably weight bear in neutral
o BAPS (seated àstanding) as tolerated o Leg press, light weight
Phase IV
>12 Weeks • Criteria for initiating return to running (straight plane jogging)
Return to o 5 x 25 single leg calf raises
Sport/Activity o Normal landing mechanics
o Complete 20 single leg squats without compensation
o 95% symmetry ROM (DF/PF)
o 95% symmetry calf circumference at 10 cm distal to tibial tubercle (Saxena, 2011)
• Return to Sport
o 90% symmetry in all SL hop testing
o 90% symmetry Y balance
• Initiate hop training when cleared to return to jogging for landing mechanics
• **Emphasize strengthening at end range PF**
• Continuation of self-stretching
• Joint mobilizations as needed
• Continued progression of strength/stability/balance exercise on stable and unstable surfaces
to correct altered mechanics
• Plyometrics progression: Single-leg shuttle plyometrics, B LE straight-plane, B LE diagonal-
plane, Rotational, Multi-directional, tuck jumps
• Resisted jogging in place with resistance in all planes
• Sports specific exercise/agility progression, emphasis on proper mechanics
References
Mullaney M, et al. Electromyographic analysis of the triceps surae muscle complex during Achilles tendon
rehabilitation program exercises. Sports Health. November 2011; 3(6): 543-546.
Saxena A, Ewen B, Maffulli N. Rehabilitation of the operated achilles tendon: parameters for predicting return to
activity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50:37-40.
Kearney RS, McGuinness KR, Achten J, Costa ML. A systematic review of early rehabilitation methods following
a rupture of the Achilles tendon. Physiotherapy. 2012;98:24–32.
Calder, J. D., & Saxby, T. S. (2005). Early, active rehabilitation following mini-open repair of Achilles tendon
rupture: a prospective study. Br J Sports Med, 39(11), 857-859. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.017509
Carcia CR, Martin RL, Houch J, Wukich DK. Achilles Pain, Stiffness, and Muscle Power Deficits: Achilles
Tendinitis Clinical Practice Guidelines Linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and
Health from the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Sport and Orthop. 2010.
40(9) A1-A26
Chiodo, C. P., & Glazebrook, M. (2010). American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline
on Treatment of Achilles Tendon Ruptures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 92, 2466-2468.
Costa, M. L., MacMillan, K., Halliday, D., Chester, R., Shepstone, L., Robinson, A. H., & Donell, S. T. (2006).
Randomised controlled trials of immediate weight-bearing mobilisation for rupture of the tendo Achillis. J Bone
Joint Surg Br, 88(1), 69-77. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16549
Costa, M. L., Shepstone, L., Darrah, C., Marshall, T., & Donell, S. T. (2003). Immediate full-weight-bearing
mobilisation for repaired Achilles tendon ruptures: a pilot study. Injury, 34(11), 874-876.
Kangas, J., Pajala, A., Ohtonen, P., & Leppilahti, J. (2007). Achilles tendon elongation after rupture repair: a
randomized comparison of 2 postoperative regimens. Am J Sports Med, 35(1), 59-64. doi:
10.1177/0363546506293255
Lansdaal, J. R., Goslings, J. C., Reichart, M., Govaert, G. A., van Scherpenzeel, K. M., Haverlag, R., & Ponsen,
K. J. (2007). The results of 163 Achilles tendon ruptures treated by a minimally invasive surgical technique and
functional aftertreatment. Injury, 38(7), 839-844. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.12.010
Maffulli, N., Tallon, C., Wong, J., Lim, K. P., & Bleakney, R. (2003). Early weightbearing and ankle mobilization
after open repair of acute midsubstance tears of the achilles tendon. Am J Sports Med, 31(5), 692-700.
Ozkaya, U., Parmaksizoglu, A. S., Kabukcuoglu, Y., Sokucu, S., & Basilgan, S. (2009). Open minimally invasive
Achilles tendon repair with early rehabilitation: functional results of 25 consecutive patients. Injury, 40(6), 669-672.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.10.033
Sadoghi, P., Rosso, C., Valderrabano, V., Leithner, A., & Vavken, P. (2012). Initial Achilles tendon repair strength-
-synthesized biomechanical data from 196 cadaver repairs. Int Orthop, 36(9), 1947-1951. doi: 10.1007/s00264-
012-1533-6
Strauss, E. J., Ishak, C., Jazrawi, L., Sherman, O., & Rosen, J. (2007). Operative treatment of acute Achilles
tendon ruptures: an institutional review of clinical outcomes. Injury, 38(7), 832-838. doi:
10.1016/j.injury.2006.06.005
Suchak, A. A., Bostick, G. P., Beaupre, L. A., Durand, D. C., & Jomha, N. M. (2008). The influence of early
weight-bearing compared with non-weight-bearing after surgical repair of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg
Am, 90(9), 1876-1883. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01242
Twaddle, B. C., & Poon, P. (2007). Early motion for Achilles tendon ruptures: is surgery important? A randomized,
prospective study. Am J Sports Med, 35(12), 2033-2038. doi: 10.1177/0363546507307503
Background
Autologous chondrocyte implantation (third generation) is a two stage surgical procedure indicated for medium to
2
large (≥2 cm ) symptomatic full thickness chondral lesions. Stage one is performed arthroscopically, where a
small sample of healthy cartilage is harvested from a non-weight bearing area of the knee. The chondrocyte
sample is sent to a laboratory where the cells are cultivated on a scaffold for 4-6 weeks. Stage two is performed
through an open procedure, or arthrotomy. The cartilage defect is exposed and debrided to an area with vertical
margins. The scaffold implant is placed in the defect and secured fibrin sealant. These third generation ACI
techniques eliminate the suture fixation previously required with second-generation ACI procedures. The various
implantation procedures are as follows:
• Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI)- thin scaffold seeded with chondrocytes
• NeoCart- chondrocytes growing and producing extracellular matrix throughout scaffold
• NovoCart- full thickness scaffold seeded with chondrocytes
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. If you are working with an Ohio State Sports Medicine patient and questions arise, please call 614-
293-2385.
Summary of Recommendations
Expectations • PT and CPM should begin at post-op day 7-10 days
• Return to sport: 12-15 months
• Please review operative report as lesion size and location may dictate speed of progression
Risk Factors • CI requires extensive rehabilitation and can often exhaust insurance approved PT visits.
Consider decreasing initial visit frequency, use of home NMES unit and daily self-ROM.
• Long-term quadriceps strength deficits typically present >1 year post-operatively.
Concomitant • Do not change protocol based on multiple defects, meniscus repair or ligamentous
Procedures reconstruction
• If multiple defects include a patellofemoral lesion, following the patellofemoral
precautions
• TTO Adjustments:
• Open brace to 0-35° at weeks 5-6
• All CKC interventions performed through protected ROM (90-45°) before transition to
full ROM
Red/Yellow Flags
Red Flags • Signs of DVT (Refer directly to ED)
(signs/symptoms that • Localized tenderness along the distribution of deep venous system
require immediate referral • Entire LE swelling
for re-evaluation)
• Calf swelling >3cm compared to asymptomatic limb
• Pitting edema
• Collateral superficial veins
• Mechanical block or clunk (Refer to surgeon for re-evaluation)
• Lack of full knee extension by 4-6 weeks (Refer to surgeon for re-evaluation)
Yellow Flags • Persistent reactive pain or effusion following therapy or ADLs
(signs/symptoms that • Decrease intensity of therapy interventions, continue effusion
require modification to management and provide patient education regarding activity modification
plan of care) until reactive symptoms resolve
Goal Maintain joint mobility and muscle tone while adhering to all post-operative precautions
Range of • 0-45°
Motion • CPM to start at day 7-10
Phase III: Weeks 4-6
Goals Emphasis is placed on increasing knee flexion ROM and improving quadriceps, gluteal and
core strength
Range of 0-105° (week 4) to 0-125° (week 6)
Motion *Achieved though CPM and AAROM (heel slides, wall slides, AAROM row machine)*
• Total volume: 300+ repetitions per day
Goal: early AROM though safe range
Weight Bearing Tibiofemoral: 60% BW (week 4) to 80% BW (week 5)
Patellofemoral: Full BW, open brace at weeks 5-6
Phase IV: Weeks 7-12
Goals The patient works toward movement independent of ambulation devices and knee braces. Full
ROM should be achieved and balance/proprioception interventions are initiated.
Range of 0-125° (week 6), 0-135° (week 7) to full ROM (week 8-10)
Motion
Weight Bearing Tibiofemoral: 90% BW (week 6), 100% BW (week 7) to full WBing without obvious gait
deviation (week 10)
Patellofemoral: Discharge brace
Suggested • Continue Phase 2 and 3 interventions
Interventions • Continue ROM interventions until symmetrical ROM is achieved
• Partial BW Shuttle Press (week 6-8)
• OKC Hamstring strengthening (week 6-7)
• Multi-angle isometrics
• Balance and proprioception interventions
• Mini squats: 0-45 degrees (week 8-10)
• Heel Taps: 2-4” (weeks 10-12)
• Step Ups: 6-8” (weeks 10-12)
• Resisted OKC quadriceps strengthening through 90-45° protected ROM (week 10-12)
• Continue NMES (seated with tibia fixed at 60° of knee flexion)
• Continue effusion management strategies as needed
Criteria to 1. ROM: Full active knee extension; no pain on passive overpressure
Discharge 2. Strength: Able to perform strong quad isometric with full tetany and superior patellar glide
Assistive and able to perform 2x10 SLR without quad lag
Device 3. Effusion: 1+ or less is preferred (2+ acceptable if all other criteria are met)
Weight Bearing: Demonstrates pain-free ambulation without visible gait deviation
Criteria to By week 12:
Progress to • Pain-free active ROM
Phase 5 • Pain-free upright cycle ergometry
• Pain-free ambulation without visible gait deviation
• Proficiency in home exercise program
Phase V: Months 3-6
Goals The majority of patients return to work either on a part-time or full-time basis. Patients should
continue skilled physical therapy to progress functional, CKC strengthening.
Range of Full AROM
Motion
Criteria to By 6 months:
Progress to • Ability to negotiate stairs and mild gradients without pain or reactive effusion
Phase 6 • Return to work, depending on the demands of the job
• Ability to perform 3x10 heel raise on 6” step with neutral frontal and sagittal plane
alignment
• Proficiency in home exercise program
Phase VI: Months 6-9
Goals Patient progress OKC interventions. Strength testing is performed to determine readiness to
initiate light plyometrics and walk-jog progression.
Range of Full AROM
Motion
Isokinetic Isokinetic testing is appropriate at 6 and 9 months
Testing *Functional strength testing should be reserved for patients returning high-level activity*
Criteria to 1. ROM: full, pain-free knee ROM, symmetrical with the uninvolved limb
Initiate 2. Strength: Isokinetic testing 80% or greater for hamstring and quad at 60º/sec and 300º/sec
Running and 3. Effusion: 1+ or less
Jumping 4. Weight Bearing: normalized gait and jogging mechanics
5. Neuromuscular Control: Pain-free hopping in place
Criteria to By 9 months:
Progress to • Quadriceps and hamstring symmetry of 80% or greater
Phase 7 • Ability to tolerate walking distances of 3 miles or greater without reactive pain or
effusion
• Ability to effectively negotiate uneven ground, including soft sand, without reactive pain
or effusion
• Ability to return to pre-operative low-impact recreational activities, including cycling,
elliptical and weight training
Phase VII: Months 9-Return to Sport
Goals The patient is able to resume all normal functionality and will continue to progress towards
return to sport.
Range of Full AROM
Motion
References
Minas T, Peterson L. Autologous chondrocyte implantation. Op Tech in Orth. 1997;7(4):323-333.
O’Driscoll S, Keeley F, Salter R. Durability of regenerated articular cartilage produced by free autogeneous
periosteal grafts in major full-thickness defects in joint surfaces under the influence of continuous passive motion.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:595-606.
Rodrigo J, Steadman R, Fulstone H. Improvement of full-thickness chondral defect healing in the human knee
after debridement and microfracture using continuous passive motion. Am J Knee Surg. 1994;7:109-16.
Salter RB. The physiologic basis of continuous passive motion for articular cartilage healing and regeneration.
Hand Clin. 1994;10(2):211-9.
McAllister DR, Joyce MJ, Mann BJ, Vangsness CT Jr. Allograft update: the current status of tissue regulation,
procurement, processing, and sterilization. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:2148-2158.
Minas T. The role of cartilage repair techniques, including chondrocyte transplantation, in focal chondral knee
damage. Instructional Course Lectures. 1999;48:629-43.
Ebert JR, Ackland T, Lloyd DG, Wood DJ. Accuracy of partial weight bearing after autologous chondrocyte
implantation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(8):1528-34.
Ebert JR, Robertson WB, Lloyd DG, Zheng MH, Wood DJ, Ackland T. Traditional vs accelerated approaches to
post-operative rehabilitation following matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): comparison of
clinical, biomechanical and radiographic outcomes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:1131-40.
Enright PL. The six-minute walk test. Respir Care. 2003;48(8):783-5.
Summary of Recommendations
Precautions 1. No testing of repaired or reconstructed ligaments (Lachman, Anterior/Posterior Drawer,
Varus/Valgus Stress) prior to 12 WEEKS
2. No isotonic resisted hamstring exercises for 8 weeks with hamstring autograft
3. No loaded open kinetic chain knee extension beyond 45 degrees for 8 WEEKS
4. Meniscus Repair:
a. No weight-bearing (WB) therapeutic exercise >90º x 8 WEEKS
b. PWB x4 WEEKS
c. No forced flexion beyond 90º x4 WEEKS
Outcome Collect at least one of the following at initial evaluation, monthly and discharge. Be consistent
Tools with which outcome tool is collected each time.
1. IKDC
2. KOOS
3. ACL-RSI
4. Tegner
Strength 1. Isometric testing anytime- fixed at 90º
Testing 2. Isokinetic testing no earlier than 12 weeks
Criteria to 1. ROM: full, pain-free knee ROM, symmetrical with the uninvolved limb
Initiate 2. Strength: Isokinetic testing 80% or greater for hamstring and quad at 60º/sec and
Running 300º/sec
and Jumping 3. Effusion: 1+ or less
4. Weight Bearing: normalized gait and jogging mechanics
5. Neuromuscular Control: Pain-free hopping in place
Criteria for 1. ROM: full, painfree knee ROM, symmetrical with the uninvolved limb
Return to 2. Strength: Isokinetic testing 90% or greater for hamstring and quad at 60º/sec and
Sport 300º/sec
3. Effusion: No reactive effusion ≥ 1+ with sport-specific activity
4. Weight Bearing: normalized gait and jogging mechanics
5. Neuromuscular control: appropriate mechanics and force attenuation strategies with high
level agility, plyometrics, and high impact movements
6. Functional Hop Testing: LSI 90% or greater for all tests
7. Physician Clearance
Middle Phase of Rehabilitation (4-12 weeks)
Appointments Goal to increase lower extremity strength. 1-2 visits per week with emphasis on patient
compliance with resistance training as part of HEP (2-3 days per week outside of therapy).
Precautions Open Chain knee extension:
• Initiate submaximal leg extension 90-45 degrees
• Initiate active knee ROM 90-0 degrees (modify if painful)
No isolated resisted hamstrings strengthening until 8 weeks
Pain and Cryotherapy/compression as needed for reactive effusion.
Effusion Patellar taping to reduce PF symptoms if present
ROM • Monitor and progress knee ROM, patellar mobility, and LE flexibility
• Begin more aggressive techniques to achieve/maintain full knee extension (i.e. weighted
bag hang) as needed
• Continue bike for ROM and warm up
• If full AROM knee extension is not achieved by 4 weeks, contact surgeon regarding ROM
concerns.
Suggested • Multi-angle knee isometrics from 60-90⁰ for patients unable to tolerate high-intensity NMES
Interventions
• Initiate open chain knee extension exercises
and timelines
o Unweighted full range LAQ
o Protected range with isotonic progression
• Progress WB quadriceps and hamstring exercises with emphasis on proper LE mechanics
(no isolated HS strengthening until 8 weeks)
• Progress gluteal and lumbopelvic strength and stability
• Progress single leg balance
• Endurance: low impact - treadmill walking, stepper, elliptical (6 weeks)
• Initiate PWB plyometrics on shuttle (8-10 weeks, see precautions to begin full WB
plyometrics)
• NMES (see parameters in week 1-4)
Criteria to d/c • <20% quadriceps deficit on isometric or isokinetic testing
NMES OR- If a Biodex machine in not available:
1. 10 SLR without quad lag
2. Normal gait
3. 10 heel taps to to 60 degrees with good quality
4. 10 rep max on LP and similar effort bilaterally
5. Inability to break quad MMT
Criteria to 1. ROM: full, pain-free knee ROM, symmetrical with the uninvolved limb
initiate 2. Strength: Isokinetic testing 80% or greater for hamstring and quad at 60º/sec and 300º/sec
Running and 3. Effusion: 1+ or less
Jumping 4. Weight Bearing: normalized gait and jogging mechanics
5. Neuromuscular Control: Pain-free hopping in place
Criteria to 1. ROM: Maintain full, pain free AROM including PF mobility
Progress to 2. Effusion: 1+ or less
Late Phase of 3. Strength: Isometric or isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength >/= 80%
Rehab
4. Weight Bearing: Able to tolerate therapeutic exercise program, including jogging
progression, without increased pain or >1+ effusion
5. Neuromuscular Control: Demonstrates proper lower extremity mechanics with all therapeutic
exercises (bilaterally)
6. Outcome Tools: >/=7/10 on #10 IKDC Questionnaire
Late Phase of Rehabilitation (weeks 12-Return to Sport)
Appointments Increased frequency from previous stage to 1-2x per week when appropriate to initiate
plyometric training and return to running program.
Precautions Criteria to initiate hopping
• Full, pain free ROM
• ≤ 1+ effusion
• ≥ 7 /10 on #10 IKDC Questionnaire (Appendix A)
• ≥ 80% isometric strength symmetry (hamstrings and quadriceps) OR 20 heel touches
on 8 inch step with good mechanics
Plyometrics
• Single-leg hop downs from increasing height (up to 12” box), Single-leg hop-holds,
Double and single-leg hopping onto unstable surface, Double and single-leg jump-turns,
Repeated tuck jumps
Criteria for 1. ROM: full, pain free knee ROM, symmetrical with the uninvolved limb
Return to 2. Strength: Isokinetic testing 90% or greater for hamstring and quad at 60º/sec and 300º/sec
Sport 3. Effusion: No reactive effusion ≥ 1+ with sport-specific activity
4. Weight Bearing: normalized gait and jogging mechanics
5. Neuromuscular control: appropriate mechanics and force attenuation strategies with high
level agility, plyometrics, and high impact movements
6. Functional Hop Testing: LSI 90% or greater for all tests
7. Physician Clearance
Background
ACL Reconstruction and MCL Repair occur after a contact or non-contact knee injury when the ACL and MCL are
both fully torn, often with involvement of the medial meniscus. Surgery uses an allograft or autograft to reconstruct
the torn ACL ligament arthroscopically. The MCL is repaired where it was torn, either distally near the insertion on
the tibia, in the middle of the ligament, or proximally near the origin on the femur. Progression of range of motion
after surgery depends on where the MCL was torn. Long-term outcomes should include full range of motion and
return to prior level of function. Return to sport is expected to take between 8-12 months depending on
comorbidities and nature of the sport.
Summary of Recommendations
Precautions 1. No testing of repaired or reconstructed ligaments (Lachman, Anterior Drawer, Valgus
Stress) prior to 12 WEEKS
2. No isotonic resisted hamstring exercises for 8 weeks with hamstring autograft
3. No loaded open kinetic chain knee extension beyond 45 degrees for 8 WEEKS
4. Meniscus Repair:
a. No weight-bearing (WB) therapeutic exercise >90º x 8 WEEKS
b. No forced flexion beyond 90º x4 WEEKS
Weight 1. NWB for 0-2 weeks with brace locked in extension
Bearing 2. TTWB for weeks 2-4 with brace locked in extension
Guidelines 3. WBAT 4-6 weeks with brace locked in extension
4. WBAT at 6 weeks with brace unlocked, wean from brace
MCL Lesion 1. Distal: Cautious knee flexion ROM to allow healing and prevent long-term valgus laxity.
Site a. Weeks 0-2: 0-30°
Considerations b. Weeks 2-4: 0-60°
c. Weeks 4-6: 0-90°
d. Weeks 6+: flexion ROM as tolerated
2. Proximal or Mid-substance: Accelerated knee flexion ROM to prevent scar formation and
loss of functional ROM.
Outcome Tools Collect at least one of the following at initial evaluation, every 6 weeks, and discharge. Be
consistent with which outcome tool is collected each time.
1. IKDC
2. KOOS
3. ACL-RSI
4. Tegner
Strength 1. Isometric testing any time after week 8- fixed at 90º
Testing 2. Isokinetic testing no earlier than 12 weeks
Therapeutic • Emphasis on quad activation without gluteal co-contraction
Exercise • Restore patellar mobility
• Symmetrical extension ROM
• Decrease effusion
Pain and Cryotherapy/compression as needed for effusion
Effusion Patellar taping to reduce PF symptoms if present
ROM • Distal MCL lesion: Continue cautious knee flexion ROM to allow healing
o Weeks 4-6: ROM 0-90°
o Weeks 6+: flexion ROM as tolerated
• Monitor and progress knee ROM, patellar mobility, and LE flexibility
• Begin more aggressive techniques to achieve/maintain full knee extension (i.e. weighted
bag hang) as needed
• ROM progression from AAROM to AROM
• Initiate bike for ROM and warm-up for distal MCL lesions, keeping knee in slight varus
position
Suggested • Multi-angle knee isometrics from 60-90° for patients unable to tolerate high-intensity NMES
Interventions • Initiate open chain knee extension exercises
and timelines o Unweighted full range LAQ
o Protected range with isotonic progression
• Initiate and progress WB strengthening/stability with emphasis on proper LE mechanics
avoiding knee valgus
o Lunges, shuttle, steamboats, side-stepping, leg press, step up/down
• Progress gluteal and lumbopelvic strength and stability
• Progress single leg balance and proprioceptive exercises
• Endurance:
o Biking at week 6
o Treadmill walking, stepper, elliptical at week 8
• Initiate PWB plyometrics on shuttle at weeks 8-10 weeks (see criteria to begin full WB
plyometrics)
• NMES (see parameters in week 0-4)
Criteria to • <20% quadriceps deficit on isometric or isokinetic testing (can use HHD for isometric
Discharge testing)
NMES OR- If testing equipment is not available:
1. 20 SLR without quad lag
2. Normal gait
3. 10 heel taps to to 60 degrees with good quality
4. 10 rep max on LP and similar effort bilaterally
5. Inability to break quad MMT
Criteria to 1. ROM: Maintain full, pain free AROM including patellofemoral mobility
Progress to 2. Effusion: 1+ or less
Late Phase of 3. Strength: Isometric or isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength >/= 80%
Rehab 4. Weight Bearing: Able to tolerate therapeutic exercise program, including PWB plyometrics,
without increased pain or >1+ effusion
5. Neuromuscular Control: Demonstrates proper lower extremity mechanics with all therapeutic
exercises (bilaterally)
6. Outcome Tools: ≥7/10 on #10 IKDC Questionnaire
Late Phase of Rehabilitation (weeks 12-Return to Sport)
Appointments Increased frequency from previous stage to 1-2x per week when appropriate to initiate
plyometric training and return to running program.
Criteria to 1. ROM: full, pain-free knee ROM, symmetrical with the uninvolved limb
initiate 2. Strength: Isokinetic testing 80% or greater for hamstring and quad at 60º/sec and 300º/sec
Running and 3. Effusion: 1+ or less
Jumping 4. Weight Bearing: normalized gait and jogging mechanics
5. Neuromuscular Control: Pain-free hopping in place
Pain and Effusion may increase with increased activity, ensure ≤1+ and/or non-reactive effusion for
Effusion progression of plyometrics
ROM Full, symmetrical to contralateral limb, and pain-free with overpressure
Therapeutic • Performance of the quadriceps, hamstrings and trunk dynamic stability
Exercise • Muscle power generation and absorption via plyometrics
• Sport- and position-specific activities
• Begin agility exercises between 50-75% effort (utilize visual feedback to improve mechanics
as needed)
• Advance plyometrics: Bilateral to single leg, progress by altering surfaces, adding ball toss,
3D rotations, etc.
Suggested Therapeutic Exercise/Neuromuscular Re-education
Interventions • Squats, leg extension, leg curl, leg press, deadlifts, lunges (multi-direction), rotational
trunk exercises on static and dynamic surfaces, resisted side steps, monster walks,
PWB to FWB jumping
• Single-leg squats on BOSU, Single-leg BOSU balance with manual perturbation to trunk
or ball, single-leg BOSU Romanian deadlift
Agility
• Side shuffling, carioca, figure 8, zig-zags, resisted jogging (Sport Cord) in straight
planes, backpedaling, ladder drills
Plyometrics
• Single-leg hop downs from increasing height (up to 12” box), Single-leg hop-holds,
Double and single-leg hopping onto unstable surface, Double and single-leg jump-turns,
Repeated tuck jumps
Criteria for 1. ROM: full, pain free knee ROM, symmetrical with the uninvolved limb
Return to 2. Strength: Isokinetic testing 90% or greater for hamstring and quad at 60º/sec and 300º/sec
Sport 3. Effusion: No reactive effusion and ≤ 1+ with sport-specific activity
4. Weight Bearing: normalized gait and jogging mechanics
5. Neuromuscular control: appropriate mechanics and force attenuation strategies with high
level agility, plyometrics, and high impact movements
6. Functional Hop Testing: LSI 90% or greater for all tests
7. Physician Clearance
Author: Kat Rethman, PT, DPT, SCS
Reviewer: John DeWitt, PT, DPT, SCS, AT
References
rd
Andrews JR, Harrelson G, Wilk KE; Physical Rehabilitation of the Injured Athlete, 3 Ed. Philadelphia, PA,
Saunders, 2004.
English, R et al. The relationship between lower extremity isokinetic work and single-leg functional hop-work test.
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2006; (15) 95-104.
Fanelli, G et al. “Management of complex knee ligament injuries.” The Journal of Joint and Bone Surgery. (2010);
92(12):2235-2246.
Griffin et al. “Medial Knee Injury: part 1, static function of the individual components of the main medial knee
structures.” American Journal of Sports Medicine (2009); 37(9): 1762-1770.
Hewett, T et al. “Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict
anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study.” American Journal of Sports Medicine.
2005; 33(4): 492-501.
Levy, B et al. “Decision making in the multiligament-injured knee: an evidence based systematic review.”
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (2009) 25(4): 430-438.
Medvecky, M et al. “A multidisciplinary approach to the evaluation, reconstruction and rehabilitation of the multi-
ligament injured athlete.” Sports Medicine (2007); 37(2):169-187.
Myer, G et al. “Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Criteria-based progression through
the return-to-sport-phase.” Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy (2006); 36(2): 385-402.
Neitzel et al. “Loading response following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during the parallel squat
exercise.” Clinical Biomechanics. (2002); 17(7):5551-554.
Peskun et al. “Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of multiligament knee injuries: an evidence-
based review." Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review (2011); 19(2): 167-173.
Romeyn et al. “Surgical treatment and rehabilitation of combined complex ligament injuries.” North American
Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. (2008); 3(4):212-225.
Skendzel, J et al. “Diagnosis and management of the multiligament-injured knee.” Journal of Orthopedic and
Sports Physical Therapy (2012); 42(3): 234-242.
Background
ACL and PCL Reconstruction occurs after a multi-ligamentous knee injury, most often sustained during a contact
force causing a knee dislocation. This accounts for <0.02% of all orthopedic injuries. Surgery may be delayed or
staged for optimal outcomes. Surgery uses an allograft or autograft to reconstruct the torn ACL and PCL
ligaments, and may repair the MCL, LCL, and/or posterolateral corner of the knee if needed as well. Long-term
complications after surgery include chronic pain, knee instability, arthrofibrosis, and loss of knee flexion ROM.
rd
Research finds that only 1/3 of athletes return to sport at prior level of function. If return to sport is possible, it is
expected to take 9-12 months depending on comorbidities and nature of the sport.
Summary of Recommendations
Weight Bearing 1. Non-weight bearing for 2 weeks, brace locked in extension
Guidelines 2. TTWB - 25% at 2 weeks, brace locked in extension
3. PWB 25-50% at 5-6 weeks, brace locked in extension
4. WBAT at 7 weeks, gradually unlock and wean from brace
ROM Guidelines 1. No knee flexion >90° for 6 weeks
2. No active hamstring /OKC flexion exercises for 8 weeks
3. No resistive OKC hamstring exercise for 12 weeks
4. Do not allow proximal tibia to rest unsupported for 12 weeks
Outcome Tools Collect at least one of the following at initial evaluation, every 6 weeks, and discharge. Be
consistent with which outcome tool is collected each time.
1. IKDC 2. KOOS 3. ACL-RSI 4. Tegner
Weeks 0-4
Weight 1. Non-weight bearing for 2 weeks, in brace locked in extension
Bearing 2. TTWB - 25% at 2 weeks with brace locked in extension
ROM 1. Begin Passive ROM (no flexion beyond 90º for 6 weeks)
o Goal of achieving full terminal knee extension (stop at 0º if PLC repaired)
o Prone knee flexion with 10# manual anterior drawer force to protect PCL
o Use varus/valgus force during PROM to protect MCL/LCL repair if needed
2. Patellar mobilizations
3. Edema control
4. ROM 6-8 times daily
Strengthening 1. Quad Sets
2. Flexion and abduction SLR with brace on; emphasis on eliminating extensor lag
3. NO active strengthening with knee flexion for 8 weeks
NMES 1. NMES pads are placed on the proximal and distal quadriceps
Parameters 2. Patient: Sitting with knee straight in long-sitting position with back supported. Towel roll
under proximal tibia to prevent posterior translation.
3. The patient is instructed to relax while the e-stim generates at least 50% of their max
volitional contraction OR maximal tolerable amperage without knee joint pain
4. 10 seconds on/ 50 seconds off x 15 min. 2 second ramp up and down. Frequency=
75pps. Pulse Width= 400microseconds
Stretching 1. Calves
Goals to 1. Able to perform strong quad isometric with full tetany and superior patellar glide
Progress to 2. SLR with no extensor lag
Next Phase 3. Good patellar mobility
4. PROM 0-70°
Weeks 4-6
Weight 1. WB 25-50% at 5-6 weeks, brace locked in extension
Bearing
ROM 1. Continue prone PROM; do not force ROM
2. Patellar mobilizations
3. Edema control
Strengthening 1. Continue NMES
2. Increase duration of Quad Sets
3. SLR with eyes open and closed; fast and slow
4. Core, Glutes
Goals to 1. PROM 0-90°: if not achieved refer back to MD
Progress to 2. Tolerance of partial weight bearing without residual pain or reactive joint effusion
Next Phase 3. ≤ 2+ joint effusion
4. 20 repetitions SLR with no extensor lag
Weeks 6-8
Weight 1. WBAT at 7 weeks, gait training and wean from brace if 20 SLR without extensor lag
Bearing 2. Ensure no knee hyperextension/varus thrust with ambulation
Criteria to 1. ROM: Full active knee extension; no pain on passive overpressure
Discharge 2. Strength: Able to perform strong quad isometric with full tetany and superior patellar glide
Assistive and able to perform 20 SLR without quad lag
Device 3. Effusion: 1+ or less is preferred (2+ acceptable if all other criteria are met)
4. Weight Bearing: Demonstrates pain-free ambulation without visible gait deviation
ROM 1. Gradual advancement of prone passive knee flexion
2. Stationary bicycle avoiding deep knee flexion
3. Maintain passive knee extension
New NMES 1. NMES pads are placed on the proximal and distal quadricep
Parameters 2. Patient: Seated with the knee at 60º flexion, shank secured with strap and back support with
thigh strap preferred. The ankle pad/belt should be two finger widths superior to the lateral
malleoli.
3. If this position creates knee pain, continue NMES in long-sitting
4. The patient is instructed to relax while the e-stim generates at least 50% of their max
volitional contraction against a fixed resistance OR maximal tolerable amperage without knee
joint pain
5. 10 seconds on/ 50 seconds off x 15 min. 2 second ramp up and down. Frequency= 75pps.
Pulse Width= 400 microseconds.
Goals to 1. Normalized gait mechanics without assistive device
Progress to 2. PROM 0-110º
Next Phase 3. Completion of exercises without exacerbation of symptoms or reactive effusion
4. ≤ 2+ joint effusion
Weeks 8-12
ROM 1. Progress prone flexion to achieve full symmetrical ROM
Weeks 12-16
ROM 1. ROM as needed
2. Progression to elliptical and stair stepper use with proper mechanics
Strength 1. Progress CKC 0°-90°
2. Resisted OKC knee extension 90°-30°
3. Progress neuromuscular strength, balance, and stability exercise (Squats, lunges, heel taps,
etc)
4. Perturbation training (slow to fast and proactive to reactive)
5. Initiate landing mechanics exercise and light plyometric activity in PWB
Criteria to 1. <20% quadriceps deficit on isometric or isokinetic testing (can use HHD for isometric testing)
Discharge OR- If testing equipment is not available:
NMES 1. 20 SLR without quad lag
2. Normal gait
3. 10 heel taps to to 60 degrees with good quality
4. 10 rep max on LP and similar effort bilaterally
5. Inability to break quad MMT
Goals to 1. ≤ 1+ joint effusion
Progress to 2. Full symmetrical flexion and extension ROM
Next Phase 3. Appropriate landing mechanics and no instability with PWB plyometric activities
4. Met criteria to discharge NMES
Weeks 16-24 (4-6 months)
Strength 1. Increase resistance and endurance with all exercises
2. OKC knee flexion exercises (0-90°)
3. Resisted OKC knee extension 90°-10°
4. Progress landing mechanics to full WB
5. Initiate walk-jog progression at 5-6 months if criteria below is met
Criteria to 1. ROM: full, pain-free knee ROM, symmetrical with the uninvolved limb
Initiate 2. Strength: Isokinetic testing 80% or greater for hamstring and quad at 60º/sec and 300º/sec
Running and 3. Effusion: 1+ or less
Jumping 4. Weight Bearing: normalized gait and jogging mechanics with no gross visual compensation
5. Neuromuscular Control: Pain-free hopping in place with appropriate landing mechanics
Criteria to 1. Met criteria for running and jumping
Progress to 2. No reactive effusion or instability with FWB plyometrics
Next Phase
Author: Kat Rethman, PT, DPT, SCS
Reviewer: John DeWitt, PT, DPT, SCS
References
rd
Andrews JR, Harrelson G, Wilk KE; Physical Rehabilitation of the Injured Athlete, 3 Ed. Philadelphia, PA,
Saunders, 2004.
Azar et al. “Ultra-low velocity knee dislocations.” The American Journal of Sports Medicine (2011); 39(10):2170-
2174.
Fanelli, G et al. “Management of complex knee ligament injuries.” The Journal of Joint and Bone Surgery. (2010);
92(12):2235-2246.
Goudie et al. “Functional outcome following PCL and complex knee ligament reconstruction.” The Knee. (2010);
230-234.
Griffin et al. “Medial Knee Injury: part 1, static function of the individual components of the main medial knee
structures.” American Journal of Sports Medicine (2009); 37(9): 1762-1770.
Hewett, T et al. “Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict
anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study.” American Journal of Sports Medicine.
2005; 33(4): 492-501.
Hirschmann et al. “Surgical treatment of complex bicruciate knee ligament injuries in elite athletes: what long-term
outcome can we expect?” American Journal of Sports Medicine. (2010); 38(6):1103-1109.
Hirschmann et al. “Clinical and radiographical outcomes after management of traumatic knee dislocation by open
single stage complete reconstruction/repair.” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. (2010); 11:102
Jiang et al. “The timing of surgical treatment of knee dislocations: a systematic review.” Knee Surg Sports
Traumatol Arthrosc (2015) 23:3108-3113.
Levy, B et al. “Decision making in the multiligament-injured knee: an evidence based systematic review.”
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (2009) 25(4): 430-438.
Lunden et al. “Current concepts in the recognition and treatment of PLC injuries of the knee.” Journal of
Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy (2010); 40(8): 502-516.
Medvecky, M et al. “A multidisciplinary approach to the evaluation, reconstruction and rehabilitation of the multi-
ligament injured athlete.” Sports Medicine (2007); 37(2):169-187.
Medina et al. “Vascular and nerve injuries after knee dislocation.” Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research
(2014) 472(9): 2621-2629.
Myer, G et al. “Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Criteria-based progression through
the return-to-sport-phase.” Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy (2006); 36(2): 385-402.
Neitzel et al. “Loading response following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during the parallel squat
exercise.” Clinical Biomechanics. (2002); 17(7):5551-554.
Peskun et al. “Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of multiligament knee injuries: an evidence-
based review." Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review (2011); 19(2): 167-173.
Romeyn et al. “Surgical treatment and rehabilitation of combined complex ligament injuries.” North American
Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. (2008); 3(4):212-225.
Skendzel, J et al. “Diagnosis and management of the multiligament-injured knee.” Journal of Orthopedic and
Sports Physical Therapy (2012); 42(3): 234-242.
Yinchuan et al. “Criteria-based management of an acute multistructure knee injury in a professional football
player: a case report.” Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy (2011); 41(9): 675-686.
CHRONIC EXERTIONAL COMPARTMENT SYNDROME
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
By: Trisha Conlan, SPT
Reviewed by: Kelly Henschen, PT, DPT, SCS, AT and JJ Kuczynski, PT, DPT
Activity Modification 1. Reduce load and volume of inciting activity, ranging from significant
Moderate level evidence volume reduction to complete cessation
6. Waterman BR, Liu J, Newcomb R, Schoenfeld AJ, Orr JD, Belmont P. Risk factors for chronic exertional compartment
syndrome in a physically active military population. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(11):2545-9.
7. Wuellner JC, Nathe CD, Kreulen CD, Burnham KJ, Giza E. Chronic exertional compartment syndrome: the athlete’s
claudication. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2017; 25:52-58.
8. de Bruijn JA, Zantvoort A et al. Factors predicting lower leg chronic exertional compartment syndrome in a large
population. Int J Sports Med. 2018; 39: 58-66.
9. Collins CK, Gilden B. A non-operative approach to the management of chronic exertional compartment syndrome in a
triathlete: a case report. IJSPT. 2016; 11 (7): 1160- 1176.
10. Helmhout P, Diebal AR et al. The effectiveness of a 6-week intervention program aimed at modifying running style in
patients with chronic exertional compartment syndrome. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015; 3(3): 1 – 10.
11. Barton CJ, Bananno DR, Carr J et al. Running retraining to treat lower limb injuries: a mixed methods study of current
evidence synthesized with expert opinion. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 513-526.
Appendix
Foot tapping
• Purpose: Hamstring engagement over gastrocnemius/soleus use for initiation of swing phase in attempt to
reduce ICP; pull the foot versus push off
• Cues: Use hamstrings to lift leg, let gravity assist lowering of leg to ground
High hopping
• Purpose: To facilitate improved hip flexor and quadriceps flexibility and improve hamstring activation
• Cues: Touch buttocks with heels, keep quadriceps relaxed
Falling Forward
• Purpose: To promote forward lean while in running position
• Cues: A controlled fall towards the wall; progress in distance away from wall to make it harder
Weight Shifting
• Purpose: To improve body awareness of center of mass alterations, shifting weight from heel to balls of foot
• Cues: Hinge at the ankles, not the trunk; chest leads
Forward lean drill
• How: Stand upright with feet flat on the ground, lean forward until you are about to lose your balance, then jog
forward maintaining your forward position of your trunk.
• Make sure the lean is a true lean of the entire body, and not just hinging forward at the hips.
• Practice 3-5 times to get a feel for what running feels like with a forward trunk lean and your feet under your body.
It is hypothesized that CAI may develop due to a loss of mechanoreceptors within the ankle joint. Furthermore,
clinical laxity may be a confounding factor in CAI and may not be present in all those with perceived instability.
Less than 50% of CAI patients demonstrate true clinical laxity, while 20% of copers demonstrate clinical laxity.
CAI likely results from a combination of several factors including poor proprioception, impaired strength and
patient perception.
Current literature classifies CAI into two groups: mechanical and functional instability. Mechanical instability
implies loss of normal anatomic restraint to lateral ankle stability, while functional instability results secondary to a
loss of proprioception and neuromuscular control.
Proprioception has been found to be a key management strategy in CAI. Several studies show that patients with
CAI demonstrate reduced performance on several proprioceptive and functional tests such as the Y-Balance,
single-leg balance and hop testing. Furthermore, literature reveals that the inclusion of proprioceptive and
neuromuscular control training strategies result in improved functional performance and improved patient reported
outcomes.
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics, and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Definitions
• Strong level evidence: supported by systematic review, meta-analysis, or >5 RCT
• Moderate level evidence: supported by 3-4 RCT
• Low level evidence: supported in 1-2 RCT or clinical case series
• Expert opinion: supported by case studies, expert opinions or opinions of the authors
Summary of Recommendations
Risk Factors Modifiable Risk Factors (strong level evidence):
• Indoor and court sports
• High intensity training > 3 days/week
• Poor neuromuscular control (impaired proprioception)
Non-modifiable risk factors (strong level evidence):
• Female
• Younger age
• Higher BMI and height
• Hindfoot and midfoot alignment (hindfoot varus, midfoot cavus)
Examination • Standing foot alignment • Mechanical Instability Testing
o Neurovascular exam (Repeated o Anterior Drawer Test
sprains may propagate peroneal o Talar Tilt
neuropathy • Functional Instability Testing
• Beighton Scale for Systemic o Y-Balance
Hypermobility o Foot Lift Test
• ROM: Weight Bearing DF lunge • Functional Hop Testing
• Strength (Dynamometry)
Differential • Chronic Ankle Instability
Diagnosis • Peroneal Neuropathy
• Peroneal Tendinopathy
Manual Therapy • Talocrural joint mobilizations
• Hindfoot, midfoot mobilizations
• Soft tissue mobilization PRN
Corrective • ROM – emphasis on dorsiflexion
Interventions • Ankle strength, foot intrinsic strengthening
• Hip/core stability
• Balance/proprioception progressions into functional movement training
Outcome Tools Consider patient reported outcome
and Testing measures
1. FAAM
2. TSK-11
Functional Testing
1. Y-Balance
2. Foot Lift Test
3. Functional Hop Testing
Criteria for Return 1. Subjective Outcome Measure > 90%
to Sport/Discharge 2. DF Lunge > 7.5 cm
3. Y-Balance > 90% composite
4. Foot Lift Test < 5 errors
5. Functional Hop Testing > 90% LSI
6. Physician clearance (if required)
Manual Therapy Manual therapy may have a role in improving joint mobility for ankle dorsiflexion.
low level Considerations should include soft tissue surrounding the ankle (triceps surae), as well as
evidence accessory joint mobility of the talocrural, subtalar, and distal tibio-fibular joints. The goal of
utilizing manual therapy techniques for individuals with CAI is to promote improved
arthrokinematics of the foot and ankle joints, and to facilitate improved dorsiflexion ROM and
proprioception of the ankle/foot complex.
Bracing/Taping Evidence indicates that bracing may or may not provide additional therapeutic benefit. It may
strong level be added at the treating therapist’s discretion to improve postural control by increasing the
evidence stability of the ankle joint, increasing foot control motion or increasing proprioceptive
capabilities. As bracing has been shown to potentially alter muscular recruitment around the
ankle, it is NOT recommended that the patient wear bracing during treatments. No injury
prevention benefits have been recognized in literature. Recommended bracing/taping
techniques to consider:
• Low dye taping (modified or standard)
• Ankle taping
• K-tape (Facilitation of ankle evertors with posterior glide of distal fibula)
• Figure 8 brace (lace up with lateral stirrups)
Discharge • DF ROM 90% of uninvolved side
Criteria / • FAAM score ≥ 1 MCID improvement
Criteria to • ≤ 1 incidences of perceived instability with functional activities in a 2 week period
Progress
expert opinion
Failure of Conservative Management
Definitions
Failure of conservative management for chronic ankle instability can be managed surgically with a Brostrom
procedure. Several factors may contribute to failure of conservative treatments, and failure can be identified as
the continued presence of mechanical or functional ankle instability for 6 months following injury and 3 months of
treatment. Brostrom procedures typically are performed with two variations: The Brostrom Evans or the Brostrom
Gould procedure. Each procedure seeks to repair or recreate the ATFL to restore ankle stability. Post-operative
outcomes are generally rated as excellent, with 90-95% of patients reporting full return to pre-morbid activity.
Additionally, 90-95% of high level athletes return to sport within 6 months, although longevity of career and
performance level have not been well followed.
Operative considerations: Surgical repair is not indicated for individuals with systemic hypermobility. The
following symptoms are considered to be a negative prognostic factor for outcomes following a Brostrom repair:
• Osteochondral defects ~20%
• Synovitis ~63%
• Impingement ~10%
• Tendon dysfunction
• Medial ankle instability (MRI)
• Syndesmotic instability (MRI)
2
• Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m )
Intra and extra-articular confounders, such as synovitis and OCD, can be managed with arthroscopic repair. This
repair is typically performed in conjunction with the primary repair.
Most frequent post-operative changes: The following are all considered normal changes following Brostrom
repairs:
• Loss of inversion ROM up to 15 degrees
• Ankle eversion strength deficit of 10%
• Decreased balance, with increased postural sway
• Decreased proprioception
Authors: Lucas Vanetten, PT, DPT, OCS; Matthew Longfellow PT, DPT; Mathew Lopez PT, DPT; Daniel
Chelette PT, DPT
Completed: 2016
References
Gribble PA, Bleakley CM, Caulfield BM, et al. Evidence review for the 2016 International Ankle Consortium
consensus statement on the prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains.
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096189.
Herring SA, Neill LB, Park O, Franks R, Indelicato P. The team physician and the return-to-play decision: A
consensus statement - 2012 update. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(12):2446-2448.
doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182750534.
Jeong BO, Kim TY, Song WJ. Effect of Preoperative Stress Radiographic Findings on Radiographic and Clinical
Outcomes of the Modified Broström Procedure for Chronic Ankle Instability. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016.
doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2015.08.010.
Kim JS, Young KW, Cho HK, Lim SM, Park YU, Lee KT. Concomitant syndesmotic instability and medial ankle
instability are risk factors for unsatisfactory outcomes in patients with chronic ankle instability. Arthrosc - J
Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2015.02.021.
Li HY, Zheng JJ, Zhang J, Hua YH, Chen SY. The Effect of Lateral Ankle Ligament Repair in Muscle Reaction
Time in Patients with Mechanical Ankle Instability. Int J Sports Med. 2015. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1550046.
Li HY, Zheng JJ, Zhang J, Cai YH, Hua YH, Chen SY. The improvement of postural control in patients with
mechanical ankle instability after lateral ankle ligaments reconstruction. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc.
2016. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3660-2.
Martin RL, Irrgang JJ. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys
Ther. 2007;37(2):72-84. doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2403.
Matsui K, Takao M, Tochigi Y, Ozeki S, Glazebrook M. Anatomy of anterior talofibular ligament and
calcaneofibular ligament for minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol
Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4194-y.
McCriskin BJ, Cameron KL, Orr JD, Waterman BR. Management and prevention of acute and chronic lateral
ankle instability in athletic patient populations. World J Orthop. 2015;6(2):161-171. doi:10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.161.
Pfile KR, Hart JM, Herman DC, Hertel J, Kerrigan DC, Ingersoll CD. Different exercise training interventions and
drop-landing biomechanics in high school female athletes. J Athl Train. 2013;48(4):450-462. doi:10.4085/1062-
6050-48.4.06.
Richie DH, Izadi FE. Return to play after an ankle sprain: Guidelines for the podiatric physician. Clin Podiatr Med
Surg. 2015;32(2):195-215. doi:10.1016/j.cpm.2014.11.003.
Shibuya N, Issac Baz an D, Evans AM, Agarwal MR, Jupiter DC, Professor A. Efficacy and Safety of Split
Peroneal Tendon Lateral Ankle Stabilization. 2016. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2015.07.017.
Terada M, Bowker S, Hiller CE, Thomas AC, Pietrosimone B, Gribble PA. Quantifying levels of function between
different subgroups of chronic ankle instability. doi:10.1111/sms.12712.
White WJ, McCollum GA, Calder JDF. Return to sport following acute lateral ligament repair of the ankle in
professional athletes. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3815-1.
Yasui Y, Murawski CD, Wollstein A, Kennedy JG. Reoperation rates following ankle ligament procedures
performed with and without concomitant arthroscopic procedures. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc.
doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4207-x.
Hall EA, Docherty CL, Simon J, Kingma JJ, Klossner JC. Strength-training protocols to improve deficits in
participants with chronic ankle instability: A randomized controlled trial. J Athl Train. 2015;50(1):36-44.
doi:10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.71.
van Ochten JM, van Middelkoop M, Meuffels D, Bierma-Zeinstra SM a. Chronic Complaints After Ankle Sprains: A
Systematic Review on Effectiveness of Treatments. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(11):1-52.
doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.5221.
Hadadi M, Ebrahimi I, Mousavi ME, Aminian G, Esteki A, Rahgozar M. The effect of combined mechanism ankle
support on postural control of patients with chronic ankle instability. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015.
doi:10.1177/0309364615596068.
Feger MA, Donovan L, Hart JM, Hertel J. Effect of ankle braces on lower extremity muscle activation during
functional exercises in participants with chronic ankle instability. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(4):476-487.
doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.02.002.
Gilbreath JP, Gaven SL, Van Lunen BL, Hoch MC. The effects of Mobilization with Movement on dorsiflexion
range of motion, dynamic balance, and self-reported function in individuals with chronic ankle instability. Man
Ther. 2014;19(2):152-157. doi:10.1016/j.math.2013.10.001.
De Ridder R, Willems TM, Vanrenterghem J, Roosen P. Effect of a Home-based Balance Training Protocol on
Dynamic Postural Control in Subjects with Chronic Ankle Instability. Int J Sport Med. 2015;36(7):596-602.
doi:10.1055/s-0034-1396823.
Mckeon PO, Hertel J. Systematic Review of Postural Control and Lateral Ankle Instability, Part II:... 2008;43(3):3-
5. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-43.3.305.
Js DV, Krips R, In S, Blankevoort L, Cn VD. Interventions for treating chronic ankle instability ( Review ). 2011;(8).
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004124.pub3.www.cochranelibrary.com.
Wikstrom EA, Tillman MD, Chmielewski TL, Cauraugh JH, Naugle KE, Borsa PA. Discriminating between copers
and people with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2012;47(2):136-142. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-47.2.136.
Wright CJ, Arnold BL, Ross SE, Ketchum J, Ericksen J, Pidcoe P. Clinical Examination results in individuals with
functional ankle instability and ankle-sprain copers. J Athl Train. 2013;48(5):581-589. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-
48.3.15.
Chan KW, Ding BC, Mroczek KJ. Acute and chronic lateral ankle instability in the athlete. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis.
2011;69(1):17-26. doi:10.1016/S0278-5919(03)00095-4.
Chung KA, Lee E, Lee S. The effect of intrinsic foot muscle training on medial longitudinal arch and ankle stability
in patients with chronic ankle sprain accompanied by foot pronation. 2016:78-83.
Croy T, Koppenhaver S, Saliba S, Hertel J. Anterior talocrural joint laxity: diagnostic accuracy of the anterior
drawer test of the ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(12):911-919. doi:10.2519/jospt.2013.4679.
Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain
injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sport Med. 2014;44(1):123-
140. doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0102-5.
Hale S a, Hertel J, Olmsted-Kramer LC. The effect of a 4-week comprehensive rehabilitation program on postural
control and lower extremity function in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.
2007;37(6):303-311. doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2322.
Hale SA, Fergus A, Axmacher R, Kiser K. Bilateral improvements in lower extremity function after unilateral
balance training in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2014;49(2):181-191. doi:10.4085/1062-
6050-49.2.06.
Hershkovich O, Tenenbaum S, Gordon B, et al. A large-scale study on epidemiology and risk factors for chronic
ankle instability in young adults. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(2):183-187. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2014.06.001.
Hoch MC, Staton GS, Medina McKeon JM, Mattacola CG, McKeon PO. Dorsiflexion and dynamic postural control
deficits are present in those with chronic ankle instability. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(6):574-579.
doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2012.02.009.
Linens SW, Ross SE, Arnold BL, Gayle R, Pidcoe P. Postural-stability tests that identify individuals with chronic
ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2014;49(1):15-23. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-48.6.09.
Kaminski TW, Hertel J, Amendola N, et al. National athletic trainers’ association position statement: Conservative
management and prevention of ankle sprains in athletes. J Athl Train. 2013;48(4):528-545. doi:10.4085/1062-
6050-48.4.02.
Ganesh GS, Chhabra D, Mrityunjay K. Efficacy of the star excursion balance test in detecting reach deficits in
subjects with chronic low back pain. Physiother Res Int. 2015;20(1):9-15. doi:10.1002/pri.1589.
Orr JD, Robbins J, Waterman BR. Management of Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability in Military Service Members.
Clin Sports Med. 2014;33(4):675-692. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2014.06.011.
Rosen AB, Ko J, Brown CN. Diagnostic accuracy of instrumented and manual talar tilt tests in chronic ankle
instability populations. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2015;25(2):e214-e221. doi:10.1111/sms.12288.
Sefton JM, Yarar C, Hicks-Little CA, Berry JW, Cordova ML. Six weeks of balance training improves sensorimotor
function in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(2):81-89.
doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.3365.
Terada M, Kosik KB, McCann RS, Gribble PA. Diaphragm Contractility in Individuals with Chronic Ankle
Instability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;(May). doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000994.
CHRONIC EXERTIONAL
COMPARTMENT SYNDROME RELEASE
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Background
Chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) is a condition caused by repetitive physical activity, commonly
seen in athletic and military populations. It causes an increase in intramuscular pressure within fascial
compartments of the body, leading to reduced local blood flow and resulting in pain, tightness, paresthesia, and
possible muscle weakness. Symptoms are increased with exertion, and relieved with rest. CECS can occur in any
fascial compartment of the body, most commonly in the anterior and lateral compartments of the lower leg.
Intracompartmental pressure tests are the gold standard for diagnosing CECS, however diagnosis is not
dependent on a positive test result, as false negatives are possible. A positive test is often defined as pressure
≥30 mm Hg 1 minute after exercise, or pressure ≥20 mm Hg 5 minutes after exercise.
CECS can be treated non-operatively, however it is often treated with a surgical fasciotomy if conservative
treatment is not successful. This procedure releases the pressure on the compartment and is considered the most
successful and definitive treatment for CECS. This protocol will focus on the open fasciotomy for the lower leg,
which involves 1-2 incisions approximately 6-10mm in length on the skin. Despite the small skin incisions the
fascia can be completely released from just below the knee to just above the ankle.
ROM Guidelines • Progress ROM as tolerated starting within the first few postoperative days
Criteria to Initiate • Ability to tolerate 15-30 minutes of continuous aerobic activity without onset of
Running/Jumping symptoms/pain
• 5/5 pain-free ankle strength of involved compartment
• Ability to complete single leg functional movements (i.e. squats and lunges) with
proper mechanics and no pain
• No increase in swelling 12-24 hours following physical activity
• No pain 1-2 hours following physical activity
Criteria to Return • Meet criteria to initiate running/jumping
to Sport • Proper neuromuscular control of eccentric and concentric multi-planar activities with
absence of pain, instability and swelling
• At least 90% plantarflexion strength of uninvolved side assessed with unilateral heel
raises on leg press or maximum heel raise repetitions with equal heel height
Outcome Tools • FAAM (ADL and Sports subscales)
• LEFS
Weeks 0-3: Protection and Mobility
Weightbearing • WBAT with progression to full, pain-free weight bearing with ambulation
• Axillary crutches (or other AD) if needed in the first few postoperative days
• Discontinue crutches when gait is normalized
Precautions • Avoid activities that increase swelling (i.e. extended sitting, tight clothing proximal to
site of surgery, and excessive heat such as a hot pack or bath)
• Avoid friction over new scar formation at incision site
• Avoid high impact activity such as running, jumping, and hopping
Edema Control • Gentle distal to proximal massage of lower leg to assist with venous return and reduce
swelling
• Ankle pumps (can perform with lower extremity elevated to assist with swelling
reduction)
ROM • NWB ankle PROM and AROM
• PF, DF, inversion, eversion
• Alphabet exercise
• Seated BAPS
• Knee PROM and AROM as needed
Weeks 4-6: Light Strengthening
Precautions • Limit swelling by minimizing prolonged weight bearing activity
• Continue to avoid friction over new scar formation at site of incision
• Avoid excessive weight bearing eccentric loading
• Avoid high impact activity such as running, jumping and hopping
ROM • Initiate scar massage/mobility and desensitization when incision is fully healed
• Gentle ankle stretching
• 30-60 second holds
• Nerve mobilizations in supine
• Focus on involved compartment (i.e. ankle PF and inversion to focus on common
peroneal nerve)
• Progress repetitions and range of motion as tolerated
• BAPS progression (seated àstanding)
Strengthening • Start open kinetic chain ankle strengthening
• 4 way ankle with theraband resistance
• Balance and proprioception exercises
• Bilateral à unilateral
• Level, firm surface à soft/unstable surface (foam or BOSU) à balance board
• Eyes open à head turns à eyes closed
• Double leg squats: mini-squats àfull squats
• Gait drills
• Sagittal plane à frontal and transverse planes
• Forward and retro marching (sagittal plane), side-stepping (frontal plane), and
carioca/grapevine walking (transverse plane)
Cardiovascular Only initiate the following when incision is fully healed:
• Stationary bicycle starting with 5-10 minutes at a low resistance and speed
• Treadmill walking starting with 5-10 minutes at 2-3 mph and progress time and speed as
able
• If desired, may begin aquatic activities/swimming starting with 10-15 minutes and
progressing time/amount as able
Goals to • Lower extremity circumference within 1 cm of uninvolved side
Progress to • Ability to maintain single leg stance with eyes open on unstable surface for 30-60 seconds
Next Phase • Ankle DF ROM equivalent to uninvolved side measured in weight bearing lunge position
• Proper lower extremity mechanics with no pain during functional double leg squats
Weeks 6-8: Progression of Strengthening/Return to Jogging
Weeks 8-12+: Return to Sport/Impact Training
Precautions • Continue to avoid pain and increased swelling during and following activity
ROM • Continue knee and ankle stretching and ROM exercises as appropriate
Strengthening • Progress strengthening exercises to promote stability and neuromuscular control with
increased loads and speeds
• Low velocity, single plane activities àhigher velocity, multi-plane activities
• Forward and backward àside-to-side and transverse plane movements
• Sport-specific training beginning at a low-intensity
• Instruct patient on gradual return to sport/activity progression
• Biomechanical assessment of specific sport activity with video analysis as needed
• Running gait: Forefoot strike running pattern reduces intracompartmental pressure
Goals to • Meet criteria to initiate running/jumping
Progress to • Proper neuromuscular control of eccentric and concentric multi-planar activities with absence
Return to of pain, instability, and swelling
Sport/Work • At least 90% plantarflexion strength of uninvolved side assessed with unilateral heel raises on
leg press or maximum heel raise repetitions with equal heel height
References
1. Blackman PG. A review of chronic exertional compartment syndrome in the lower leg. Med Sci Sports
Exerc. 2000;32(3 Suppl):S4-10.
2. Bong MR, Polatsch DB, Jazrawi LM, Rokito AS. Chronic exertional compartment syndrome: diagnosis
and management. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2005;62(3-4):77-84.
3. Brennan FH, Kane SF. Diagnosis, treatment options, and rehabilitation of chronic lower leg exertional
compartment syndrome. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2003;2(5):247-50.
4. Bresnahan JJ, Hennrikus WL. Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome in a High School Soccer
Player. Case Rep Orthop. 2015;2015:965257.
5. Campano D, Robaina JA, Kusnezov N, Dunn JC, Waterman BR. Surgical Management for Chronic
Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Leg: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Arthroscopy.
2016;32(7):1478-86.
6. Dai AZ, Zacchilli M, Jejurikar N, Pham H, Jazrawi L. Open 4-Compartment Fasciotomy for Chronic
Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Leg. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6(6):e2191-e2201.
7. Flautt W, Miller J. Post-surgical rehabilitation following fasciotomies for bilateral chronic exertional
compartment syndrome in a special forces soldier: a case report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8(5):701-
15.
8. Fraipont MJ, Adamson GJ. Chronic exertional compartment syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg.
2003;11(4):268-76.
9. George CA, Hutchinson MR. Chronic exertional compartment syndrome. Clin Sports Med.
2012;31(2):307-19.
10. Helmhout PH, Diebal AR, Van der kaaden L, Harts CC, Beutler A, Zimmermann WO. The Effectiveness
of a 6-Week Intervention Program Aimed at Modifying Running Style in Patients With Chronic Exertional
Compartment Syndrome: Results From a Series of Case Studies. Orthop J Sports Med.
2015;3(3):2325967115575691.
11. Irion V, Magnussen RA, Miller TL, Kaeding CC. Return to activity following fasciotomy for chronic
exertional compartment syndrome. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(7):1223-8.
12. Konor MM, Morton S, Eckerson JM, Grindstaff TL. Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion
range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(3):279-87.
13. Möller M, Lind K, Styf J, Karlsson J. The reliability of isokinetic testing of the ankle joint and a heel-raise
test for endurance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13(1):60-71.
14. Pedowitz RA, Hargens AR, Mubarak SJ, Gershuni DH. Modified criteria for the objective diagnosis of
chronic compartment syndrome of the leg. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(1):35-40.
15. Roberts A, Franklyn-miller A. The validity of the diagnostic criteria used in chronic exertional compartment
syndrome: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22(5):585-95.
16. Schubert AG. Exertional compartment syndrome: review of the literature and proposed rehabilitation
guidelines following surgical release. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011;6(2):126-41.
17. Snowden J, Becker JA, Brosky JA, Hazle C. Chronic leg pain in a division ii field hockey player: a case
report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(1):125-34.
18. Tjeerdsma J. Outcome of a Specific Compartment Fasciotomy Versus a Complete Compartment
Fasciotomy of the Leg in One Patient With Bilateral Anterior Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome:
A Case Report. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55(5):1027-34.
19. Vajapey S, Miller TL. Evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic exertional compartment syndrome:
a review of current literature. The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 2017;45(4):391-398.
Mobility • Quadriceps
• Hip flexors
• Hamstrings
• IT Band
• Gastroc/soleus
Neuromuscular • Proprioception exercises
Control/Strengthening • Multi-angle CKC exercises
• Balance training
• Quadriceps recruitment
• Hip ABD/core strength
• Light plyometrics: emphasize correct landing mechanics
Functional Activities • Ascend/descend stairs with reciprocal gait pattern independent of UE support
Mobility • Quadriceps
• Hip flexors
• Hamstrings
• IT Band
• Gastroc/soleus
Neuromuscular • Sport-specific drills
Control/Strengthening • Plyometrics
• Core strength
• Begin interval running program
• Functional testing: hop tests, star test, Y balance, etc
Goal: Return to sport
Functional Tests Single hop for distance: Have the Cross-over hop for distance: This test
subject line their heel up with the zero is set up with a 15cm strip, extending 6
mark of the tape measure, wearing meters. The subject lines his heel up at
athletic shoes. The subject then hops as the zero mark of the tape measure and
far as he can, landing on the same push hops 3 times on one foot, crossing over
off leg, for at least 3 seconds. The arms the center line each time. Each subject
are allowed to move freely during the should hop as far forward as he can on
testing. Allow him to perform 4 practice each hop, but only the total distance
hops on each leg. Then, have the hopped is recorded Allow the subject to
subject perform 4 trials, recording each perform 4 practice rounds before
distance from the starting point to the recording. Average the distances for
back of the heel. Average the distances each limb.
for each limb.
Scoring
• Begin with the uninvolved leg. If using tape to mark distance, remove it before
the next trial to minimize visual cues.
• Greater than a 15% difference in average distance between the right and left
limbs should be cause for concern, indicating quad, and hamstring
weaknesses that should be addressed prior to return to sport.
• If patient fails test, evaluate and implement appropriate
trength/stability/balance exercise strategies. Once resolved, test again.
References
Andrews JR, Harrelson GL, Wilk KE. Physical Rehabilitation of the Injured Athlete. Saunders:
Philadelphia; 2004.
Wilk KE, Romaniello WT, Soscia SM, Arrigo CA, Andrews JR. The relationship between
subjective knee scores, isokinetic testing, and functional testing in the ACL-reconstructed knee. J
Orthop Sports Phys Ther.1994;20(2): 60-73.
Rehabilitation Precautions
• Patient will remain in long-leg post-operative brace for 8 weeks gradually increasing weightbearing status
from none/toe-touch to full
• AROM is restricted to 110o for the first two weeks
• AROM is progressed to 135 o after two weeks
5 Months • Modalities for pain/edema management o Step-downs
o Cryotherapy o BOSU mini-squats
• Stretching o Plyometric progression
o Hamstrings, gastrocnemius/soleus, • Conditioning
iliotibial band, quadriceps o Stationary bike
• Strengthening o Aquatics program
o Leg Press (70-10º) o Swimming (kicking motion)
o Hip abduction/adduction steamboat o Walking
and/or multi-hip machine o Stairclimber/elliptical
o Knee flexion: hamstring curls (90º) • Sports-specific exericise (75-100%)
o Knee extension: quadriceps (90-30º) o Line jumps
o Core Strengthening o Carioca
• Balance/Proprioceptive Training o Ladder drills
o Weight-shifts
o Mini trampoline
o BAPS board
6 Months • Maintain the above therapeutic exercise plan at six months
• Sport-Specific Activity (75-100%)
o Running straight
o Cutting movements
§ Carioca
§ Figure 8s
§ 45 degree cuts
§ 90 degree cuts
• Return to Sport
References
Noyes FR, Mayfield W, Barber-Westin SD, Albright JC, Heckmann TP. Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: an
operative technique and rehabilitation program to decrease complications and promote early union and function.
Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 1262- 1273.
Wolcott M. Osteotomies around the knee for the young athlete with osteoarthritis. ClinSports Med. 2005; 24: 153-
161.
Mangine RE, Eitert-Mangine M, Burch D, Becker BL, Farag L. Postoperative management of the patellofemoral
patient. JOSPT. 1998; 28(5): 323-335.
KNEE MICROFRACTURE
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Rehabilitation Precautions
Phase I: Transition Phase (Weeks 6-12)
Goals 1. Gradually improve quadriceps strength/endurance
2. Gradual increase in functional activities
Phase III: Remodeling (Weeks 12-16)
Phase IV: Maturation Phase (Weeks 16-26)
References
Andrews JR, Harrelson G, Wilk KE. Physical Rehabilitation of the Injured Athlete, 3rd Ed. Philadelphia, PA,
Saunders, 2004.
Gill T, Asnis, P, Berkson E. The Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects using the Microfracture
Technique. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(10):728-738.
Gillogly SD, Myers TH, Reinold MM. Treatment of Full-Thickness Chondral Defects in the Knee With
Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(10):751-764.
Hertel J, Braham RA, Hale SA, Olmsted-Kramer LC. Simplifying the Star Excursion Balance Test: Analyses
of Subjects with and without Chronic Ankle Instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(3):131-7.
Kim HT, et al. A Peek Into the Possible Future of Management of Articular Cartilage Injuries: Gene
Therapy and Scaffolds for Cartilage Repair. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(10):765-773.
Kinzey SJ, Armstrong CW. The Reliability of the Star-Excursion Test in Assessing Dynamic Balance. J
Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27(5):356-60.
Kreuz PC, et al. Importance of Sports in Cartilage Regeneration After Autologous Chondrocyte
Implantation: A Prospective Study With a 3-Year Follow-Up. The American Journal of Sports Medicine.
2007;10:1-8.
Lewis PG, et al. Basic Science and Treatment Options for Articular Cartilage Injuries. J Orthop Sports Phys
Ther. 2006;36(10):717-727.
Manske RC. Postsurgical Orthopedic Sports Rehabilitation: Knee & Shoulder. St. Louis, MO, Mosby;
2006:383-407.
Myer GD, Paterno MV, Ford KR, Quatman CE, Hewett TE. Progression Through the Return-to-Sport-Phase.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(2):385-402.
Reinold MM. Articular Defects in the Knee: Recent Advances and Future Optimism. J Orthop Sports Phys
Ther. 2006;36(10):715-716.
Reinold MM, et al. Current Concepts in the Rehabilitation Following Articular Cartilage Repair Procedures
in the Knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(10):774-794.
Wilk KE, et al. Rehabilitation of Articular Lesions in the Athletes Knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.
2006;36(10):815-827.
Background
The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is a ligament on the medial apsect of the knee which helps stabilize
the patella against lateral movement. This ligament may be injured in a patella dislocation. A MPFL reconstruction
surgery uses a ligament from somewhere else in the body to reconstruct this ligament stabilizing the patella.
Summary of Recommendations
Risk Factors • Patellar instability
• Altered mechanics with functional movement
• Bony morphology
• Quadriceps strength deficits
Manual therapy • Patellar Mobilization: Passive superior glide and medial glide only until 6 weeks
• Knee extension/flexion PROM
• Scar massage
• Soft tissue mobilization as appropriate
Criteria for • Functional Test
discharge o Single leg and triple cross-over hop test for distance (within 15% of uninvolved limb)
• Isokinetic Testing
o ≤10% difference in isokinetic peak torque with knee extension and knee flexion (60º/sec,
and 300º/sec) between involved and uninvolved limbs
o Quadriceps to hamstring isokinetic strength ratio = 60%
• No signs of patellar instability with clinical testing.
• Complete sport-specific drills without compensatory movements, exacerbation of
symptoms or reactive effusion
Phase I Weeks 2-4: Protection (Days 14-28)
Gait • WBAT
• Gait training emphasizing avoidance of flexed or stiff-knee gait and normal push-off with
gastrocnemius/soleus complex to restore normal gait speed and cadence
ROM • Continue passive, active-assisted, and active ROM as tolerated
• Meniscal repairs: no forced flexion beyond 90º
• Towel stretching, prone hangs, ‘bag hangs’ to achieve and maintain knee extension
symmetrical to the contralateral limb
• Bike with NO resistance
• Patellar mobilization with emphasis on superior/inferior glides
• Begin light Quad and HAMSTRING stretching
Strengthening • Continue weeks 0-2
• Quad set progression (i.e. prone QS, supine, TKE)
• SLR in flexion, abduction, adduction, extension
• NMES at 60º knee flexion
• Initiate HAMSTRING activation exercises (heel slide, hamstring sets, bridges)
• Step-ups (2” starting height) progressed without increased pain and good technique
• Begin trunk and lumbopelvic strengthening
o Bridging, planks, pelvic tilts, teach abdominal bracing
• Shuttle/Leg Press (90º – 0º)
o bilateral to single-leg presses per patient tolerance and good mechanics/control
o increase resistance per patient tolerance
• Single leg stance
o Eyes open to eyes closed
o Progress to dynamic movements and/or unstable surface
• Heel/toe raises
• Squat correct in modified range
Goals to 1. Effusion: ≤ 2+
progress to 2. Patient is able to tolerate full WB without increased pain or effusion
next phase 3. Patient able to walk on level surfaces without assistive device and normal mechanics
4. Patient able to stand on single-leg at least 30 seconds without loss of balance
Phase II Weeks 4-6
ROM • Continue passive, active-assisted, and active ROM as tolerated
***Concerns with limited ROM should be communicated directly with surgeon***
• Continue patellar mobilization as needed
• Bike-light resistance
• Continue with quadriceps and hamstring flexibility
Strengthening • Continue NMES
• Weighted multi-angle SLRs
• Resistance exercises for gluteal strengthening
o Resisted side stepping, and backward walking, clamshells, reverse clamshells
• Progressive resistance quadriceps and hamstring exercises per patient tolerance
o Partial ROM lunges
• Progress WB/CKC (shuttle, aquatics, Total Gym, etc.) strengthening
• Squat progressions on stable and unstable surface with good mechanics
• NO JOGGING OR SINGLE-LEG PLYOMETRICS
Goals to 1. Patient is able to tolerate therapeutic exercise program without increased pain or effusion
progress to grade (≤1+)
next phase 2. Full, pain-free AROM is equal to contralateral limb (***CONTACT MD IF ABNORMAL***)
3. Normal patellofemoral mobility without apprehension
4. Patient demonstrates normal mechanics without pain during reciprocal stair ascent and
descent
Phase III Weeks 10-12
ROM • Continue with stretching and Bike
Strengthening/ • Full weight bearing (FWB) strengthening exercises
Dynamic • Strength progression from stable to unstable surface
Control/ • Progress full range open-chain knee extension exercises as tolerated without pain
Functional • Progress hamstrings strengthening as tolerated (i.e. Double leg hamstrings curls with
Activities physioball, resisted leg curls, etc.)
• Plyometric progression
o Squat jumps/ broad jumps initially at 50% effort for height/distance then progress when
correct technique is demonstrated
• Introduce single leg jumping and rotational activities and jogging with increasing resistance
• Initiate walk-jog progression
o Criteria to initiate jogging
• Full active knee extension
• Normal landing mechanics and single leg squat pattern
• Strength of involved limb is at least 80% of uninvolved limb
• Audible rhythmic strike patterns and no gross visual antalgic pattern
Goals to 1. Effusion ≤ 1+ (can be swept out of medial sulcus and returns only with lateral sweep)
progress to 2. Patient is able to tolerate therapeutic exercise program without increased pain or effusion
next phase grade
3. Maintain Full, pain-free AROM is equal to contralateral
4. Normal patellofemoral mobility
5. Patient demonstrates normal mechanics with all CKC exercise and early jumping activities
Phase IV: Return to Sport/Activity Weeks 12-16
ROM • Maintain ROM equal to uninvolved limb
Strengthening • Emphasize performance of the quadriceps, hamstrings and trunk dynamic stability
• Emphasize muscle power generation and absorption
• Focus on activities that challenge muscle demand in intensity, frequency, and duration of
activity
• Emphasize sport- and position-specific activities
Consider Examples
• Double leg and single leg activities and • Weight lifting: squats, leg extension, leg
transitions curl, leg press, deadlifts
• Vary planes of movement and change of • Lunges-forward, backward, rotational, side
direction • Rotational trunk exercises on static and
• Perturbations and alter support surface dynamic surfaces
(indoor and outdoor) • Unilateral shuttle jumping with increasing
• Challenge multiple muscle groups (lower resistance and mid-air rotations
extremity and core) simultaneously
Return to • Emphasize appropriate symmetry in weight-bearing, joint loading and technique during
Sport performance of all therapeutic activities and plyometrics
Activities • Emphasize sport- and position-specific activities
• Add ball, racquet, stick
Consider: Examples:
• Impact loading and appropriate • Single-leg hop downs from increasing
attenuation strategy, cue regarding height (up to 12” box)
“hard” landings • Single-leg hop-holds (stable surface
• Double leg and single leg activities and ..Airex pad)
transitions • Double and single-leg hopping onto
• Vary planes of movement and change of unstable surface (i.e. Airex pad)
direction • Tuck jumps (focus on increasing multi-
joint flexion during landing and holding
stable position)
• 90º to 180º jumps
• Begin agility exercises between 50-75% (utilize visual feedback to improve mechanics)
o Side shuffling o Figure 8 o Resisted jogging (Sports
o Hopping o Zig-zags Cord) in straight planes, etc
o Carioca o Back pedaling
Goals to • Functional Test
progress to o Single leg and triple cross-over hop test for distance (within 15% of uninvolved limb)
Independent • Isokinetic Testing
Program o ≤10% deficit in isokinetic peak torque with knee extension and knee flexion (60º/sec,
and 300º/sec) compared to uninvolved limb
o Quadriceps to hamstring isokinetic strength ratio = 60%
• Complete sport-specific drills without compensatory movements, exacerbation of
symptoms or reactive effusion
Precautions
• Weight bearing as tolerated (Dr. Kaeding)
• Non-weight bearing without bracing for 4 weeks post-op (Dr. Jones, Dr. Flanigan)
• No weight bearing flexion beyond 90o for eight weeks
• No resistive hamstring exercises for 8 weeks
• Isotonic Strengthening
o 40-90º open-chained to avoid patellofemoral irritation
o < 90º closed-chained to avoid patellofemoral irritation
• All progression based on soft tissue healing
Weeks 1- 4
ROM • Begin ROM progression from active-assisted to active (no force flexion beyond
90º)
• Patellar mobilization
• Edema control
• Exercise bike: Half revolutions
Strengthening • Neuromuscular re-ed with stim and/or biofeedback (if warranted)
• Initiate NWB strengthening if weight restrictions in place
o Modify ROM (See above)
o Quad Set
o SLR
• Initiate both WB and NWB strengthening if weight bearing as tolerated
o Modify ROM (See above)
o Quad Set, TKE, etc
o SLR
o Balance exercise
• Partial WB Shuttle/Leg Press
Goals to 1. Good quad set
Progress to 2. ROM 0-90º
Next Phase 3. Little to no extension lag with SLR
4. Minimal to no edema
Weeks 6-8
ROM • Continues with emphasis on terminal extension and pain-free flexion
• Exercise bike for endurance
Weeks 8-10
ROM • Continue with exercise bike and stretching
Weeks 10-12
ROM • Continue and progress WB and NWB strengthening
• Full weight bearing plyometrics
o Bilateral
o Shuttle
o Rotational and single leg jumping
• Initiate walk-jog progression
o Criteria to initiate jogging
§ ≥ 7 /10 on #10 IKDC Questionnaire (Appendix A)
§ Complete single leg hop-downs without medial/lateral knee
displacement
§ Normalized ROM
§ Audible rhythmic strike patterns and no gross visual antalgia
Goals to 1. ≥ 7 /10 on #10 IKDC Questionnaire - Appendix A
Progress to 2. Complete plyometric and jogging activity without pain and/or dynamic
Next Phase instability
3. No reactive effusion
4. ROM 0-135º
Weeks 12- 16
ROM • Continue per tolerance and pre-exercise warm-up
“How would you rank the function of your knee on the scale of 0 to 10 with 10 being normal, excellent function
and 0 being the inability to perform an of your usual daily activities which may include sports?”
Functional tests
1. Single hop for distance: Have the subject line their heel up with the zero mark of the tape measure,
wearing athletic shoes. The subject then hops as far as he can, landing on the same push off leg, for at
least 3 seconds. The arms are allowed to move freely during the testing. Allow him to perform 4 practice
hops on each leg. Then, have the subject perform 4 trials, recording each distance from the starting point
to the back of the heel. Average the distances for each limb.
2. Cross-over hop for distance: This test is set up with a 15cm strip, extending 6 meters. The subject lines
his heel up at the zero mark of the tape measure and hops 3 times on one foot, crossing over the center
line each time. Each subject should hop as far forward as he can on each hop, but only the total distance
hopped is recorded Allow the subject to perform 4 practice rounds before recording. Average the
distances for each limb.
Scoring
• Begin with the uninvolved leg. If using tape to mark distance, remove it before the next trial to
minimize visual cues.
• Greater than a 15% difference in average distance between the right and left limbs should be cause
for concern, indicating quad, and hamstring weaknesses that should be addressed prior to return to
sport.
• If patient fails test, evaluate and implement appropriate strength/stability/balance exercise strategies.
Once resolved, test again.
References
Brindle T, Nyland J, Johnson DL The Meniscus: Review of Basic Principles with Application to Surgery and
Rehabilitation. J of Ath Train June 2001 32(2)
Chang HC, Nyland J, Caborn AN, Burden R: Biomedical Evaluation of Menical Repair Systems. Am J Sports
Med2005;33: 1846-1852
Andrews JR, Harrelson G, Wilk KE (2004):Physical Rehabilitation of the Injured Athlete, 3rd Ed. Philadelphia, PA,
Saunders.
Myer GD, Paterno MV, Ford KR, Quatman CE, Hewett TE; Progression through the return-to-sport-phase, J
Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2006;36(2): 385-402.
Hewett TE. Myer GD, Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the
knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med.
2005;33: 492-501.
English R, Brannock M, Chik WT, Eastwood LS, Uhl T. The relationship between lower extremity isokinetic work
and single-leg functional hop-work test. J Sport Rehabil. 2006; 15 95-104
Bolgla LA, Keskula DR. Reliability of lower extremity functional performance tests. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.
1997; 26 (3): 138-142
ADVANCED MENISCAL REPAIR
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
CONSIDERATIONS FOR RADIAL, ROOT AND HORIZONTAL CLEAVAGE REPAIRS
Background
Meniscal root/radial tears present in a variety of forms, ranging from partial to complete avulsion. Root
and radial tears can have a profound effect on the health of the articular cartilage of the knee with the
potential for meniscal extrusion and accelerated arthritic degeneration if left untreated. Horizontal
cleavage tears can result in advanced degeneration of the meniscus tissue and underlying cartilage,
especially during high-impact activity. The listed clinical practice recommendations are more conservative
than traditional meniscus repair protocols due to the complexity of the surgical technique. The direct
attachment of the hamstring and popliteus tendons to the menisci requires limited knee flexor active
contraction during the protection phase of recovery for the meniscus root/radial repair. Additional
protection of these repairs requires extended non-weight bearing precautions and special consideration of
CKC knee flexion due to biomechanical stresses of healing tissues.
As surgical techniques continue to be refined, the literature regarding protocols throughout the
rehabilitation continuum of care are lacking. The listed clinical practice guideline is based on anatomical,
biomechanical and surgical principles with criterion-based progressions.
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and
clinician evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Meniscal Studies report CKC loading to medial and lateral posterior horns:
Loading • 4x more pressure at 90° than 0°
• Significant pressure increase from 30° to 60°
• Unlikely to stress roots in a safe CKC progression from 0° to 45°
Mueller et al 2016
Outcome Collect at least one of the following at initial evaluation, every 6 weeks and discharge. Be
Tools consistent with which outcome tool is collected each time.
1. IKDC
2. Tegner Activity Level
3. Lyshome Knee Score
Criteria to *NWBi x 6 WEEKS, Full Wg with no assisted device (AD) by week 8-9
Discharge 1. ROM: Full active knee extension; no pain on passive overpressure
Assistive 2. Strength: Able to perform strong quad isometric with full tetany and superior patellar
Device glide and able to perform 2x10 SLR without quad lag
3. Effusion: 1+ or less is preferred
4. Weight Bearing: Demonstrates pain-free ambulation without visible gait deviation for 3
minutes at self-selected speed
Criteria to 1. ROM: full, pain-free knee ROM, symmetrical with the uninvolved limb
Initiate 2. Strength: Isokinetic testing 80% or greater for hamstring and quad at 60º/sec and
Running and 300º/sec
Jumping 3. Effusion: 1+ or less
4. Weight Bearing: normalized gait and jogging mechanics
5. Neuromuscular Control: Pain-free hopping in place
Criteria for 1. ROM: full, painfree knee ROM, symmetrical with the uninvolved limb
Return to 2. Strength: Isokinetic testing 90% or greater for hamstring and quad at 60º/sec and
Sport 300º/sec
3. Effusion: No reactive effusion ≥ 1+ with sport-specific activity
4. Weight Bearing: normalized gait and jogging mechanics
5. Neuromuscular control: appropriate mechanics and force attenuation strategies with
high level agility, plyometrics, and high impact movements
6. Functional Testing:
o Vail Sports Test, >46/54
o Anterior reach on Y-Balance test, <5cm difference
o Y Balance composite score, >94%
o Modified Agility T Test, >90% of uninvolved
o Single-leg hop series, >90% of uninvolved
7. Physician Clearance
Phase 1 (Weeks 0-6): Protection, ROM, Muscle Activation
Goals 1. Protect surgical repair
2. Resolve joint effusion to 1+ or less
3. Restore full ROM
Precautions 1. NWB
2. PROM: 0-90 degrees for 2 weeks
3. Progress ROM as tolerated thereafter
4. No isolated hamstrings activation for radial/root repairs
ROM Extension: Emphasis on achieving full knee extension immediately following surgery. If
full extension is not achieved by 4 weeks, contact surgeon regarding ROM concerns.
Flexion:
• Root/Radial Only: Limited to PROM due to hamstring/popliteus attachment to
meniscus
• Limited 0-90 degrees for first 2 weeks
• After 2 weeks, gentle full PROM is allowed
NMES • NMES pads are placed on the proximal and distal quadriceps
Parameters • Patient: Seated with the knee in at least 60º flexion, shank secured with strap and
back support with thigh strap preferred. The ankle pad/belt should be two finger
widths superior to the lateral malleoli
• The patient is instructed to relax while the e-stim generates at least 50% of their max
volitional contraction against a fixed resistance OR maximal tolerable amperage
without knee joint pain
• 10-20 seconds on/ 50 seconds off x 15 min Frequency= 75pps. Pulse Width= 400
microseconds.
Criteria to 1. ROM: Full active knee extension; no pain on passive overpressure
Discharge 2. Strength: Able to perform strong quad isometric with full tetany and superior patellar
Assistive glide and able to perform 2x10 SLR without quad lag
Device 3. Effusion: 1+ or less is preferred (2+ acceptable if all other criteria are met)
4. Weight Bearing: Demonstrates pain-free ambulation without visible gait deviation
ROM • Monitor and progress knee ROM, patellar mobility, and LE flexibility
• Begin more aggressive techniques to achieve/maintain full knee extension (i.e.
weighted bag hang) as needed
• Continue bike for ROM and warmup
• If full AROM knee extension is not achieved by 4 weeks, contact surgeon
regarding ROM concerns.
Suggested • Multi-angle knee isometrics from 60-90⁰ for patients unable to tolerate high-
Interventions intensity NMES
and timelines • Progress WB quadriceps and hamstring exercises with emphasis on proper LE
mechanics
o Root/Radial Repairs: no isometric HS activity until 8 weeks, no isolated
hamstring isotonics until 12 weeks
• Progress gluteal and lumbopelvic strength and stability
• Progress single leg balance
• NMES (see parameters in week 0-6)
Pain and Effusion may increase with increased activity, ≤1+ and/or non-reactive effusion for
Effusion progression of endurance activities
ROM Full, symmetrical to contralateral limb, and pain free with overpressure
Therapeutic Performance of the quadriceps, hamstrings and trunk dynamic stability with low load,
Exercise high repetitions
Criteria to 90 second hold in single leg squat position at 45 degrees of knee flexion
Progress to
Phase 3
Pain and Effusion may increase with increased activity, ≤1+ and/or non-reactive effusion
Effusion
Therapeutic Performance of the quadriceps, hamstrings and trunk dynamic stability with high
Exercise resistance, low repetitions
Pain and Effusion Effusion may increase with increased activity, ≤1+ and/or non-reactive effusion
for progression of plyometrics
Therapeutic Performance of the quadriceps, hamstrings and trunk dynamic stability with
Exercise sports-specific activity
References
Arno S, Bell CP, Uquillas C, Borukhov I, Walker PS. “Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics Following a
Horizontal Cleavage Lesion in the Posterior Horn of the Medial Meniscus.” J Orthop Res. 2015; 33(4):
584-590.
Becker R, Wirz D, Wolf C, Göpfert B, Nebelung W, Friederich N. “Measurement of meniscofemoral
contact pressure after repair of bucket-handle tears with biodegradable implants.” Arch Orthop Trauma
Surg. 2005;125:254-260. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s00402-004-0739-5.
Bhatia S, LaPrade CM, Ellman MB, LaPrade RF. “Meniscal Root Tears: Significance, Diagnosis and
Treatment.” Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(12): 3016-3030.
Chung KS, Ha JK, Ra HJ, Kim JG. “A Menta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Posterior
Horn Medial Meniscus Root Repairs.” Knee Surg sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24: 1455-1468.
Frizziero A, Ferrari R, Giannotti E, Ferroni C, Poli P, Masiero S. “The meniscus tear: state of the art of
rehabilitation protocols related to surgical procedures.” Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal.
2012;2(4):295-301.
Kurzweil PR, Lynch NM, Coleman S, Kearney B. “Repair of Horizontal Meniscus Tears: A Systematic
Review.” Arthroscopy. 2014; 30(11): 1513-1519.
LaPrade CM, et al. “Meniscal Root Tears: A Classification System Based on Tear Morphology.” Am J
Sports Med. 2015; 43(2): 363-369.
LaParade CM, et al. “Biomechanical Consequences of a Nonanatomic Posterior Medial Meniscus Root
Repair.” Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43(4): 912-920.
Lavender CD, Hanzlik SR, Caldwell PE, Pearson SE. “Transosseous Medial Meniscal Root Repair Using
a Modified Mason-Allen Suture Configuration.” Arthroscopy Techniques. 2015; 4(6): e781-e784.
Mueller BT, Moulton SG, O'Brien L, LaPrade RF. “Rehabilitation Following Meniscal Root Repair: A
Clinical Commentary.” J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016; Feb;46(2):104-13.
Chimera NJ, Warren M. Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport. World Journal
of Orthopedics. 2016; 7(4):202-217
Myer GD, Schmitt LC, Brent JL, et al. Utilization of Modified NFL Combine Testing to Identify Functional
Deficits in Athletes Following ACL Reconstruction. The Journal of orthopedic and sports physical therapy.
2011:41(6):377-387
Garrison JC, Shanley E, Thigpen C, et al. The reliability of the Vail Sport Test as a measure of physical
performance following anterior cruciate ligament recontruction. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 7(1):20-30.
Appendix A: Vail Sports Test
Total Points: _____/54 (Patient must score 46/54 on the test in order to pass)
Single Leg Squat (Goal: 3 minutes): subject must perform each repetition at a cadence of 1 second up
and 1 second down against resistance of a sportcord (placed under the foot of the leg that the test is
being performed on).
Yes (1) No (0) Minute 1 Minute 2 Minute 3
Lateral Bounding (Goal: 90 seconds): subject performs a lateral hopping motion against resistance of a
sportcord attached to the subject’s waist via a belt and on the other end to an immoveable object that is
level with the waist. The injured leg is positioned as the inside leg or the leg closest to the wall. The
patient is instructed to hop from one leg to the other (leg length distance), absorbing energy while they
land by bending at the knee and hip. Landing boundaries (distance of the hop) are demarcated on the
floor with two pieces of tape, one of which begins at the point of resistance of the sportcord as it is
stretched away from the wall and the other is the measured distance of the subject’s leg length from the
first piece of tape.
st nd rd
Yes (1) No (0) 1 30 2 30 3 30
seconds seconds seconds
Backward Jogging (goal: 2 minutes): subject performs backward jogging against resistance of the
sportcord with the belt around waist. The patient is instructed to hop from one leg to the other in an up
and down manner (similar to jogging in place) while using proper form and absorbing energy with each
landing by bending at the knee and hip.
Yes (1) No (0) Minute 1 Minute 2
Right
Left
Appendix C: Modified Agility T-Test
The modified agility T-test was developed from the standard T-test to evaluate lower extremity side-to-
side differences in cutting and running maneuvers. The participant is initially guided through the course by
the test administrator, who emphasizes the importance of performing a shuffling movement and not
running or using crossover steps during the lateral movement portions of the test. Participant will
performs test the test to each direction after adequate rest (2min). The total time is compared between
each limb, the shuffle push-off limb determines involved or uninvolved limb.
General Precautions
• WBAT in immobilizer first 4 weeks (and/or until no quad lag) May unlock with sitting
• Perform protected electrical stimulation program if warranted
• Patella Mobilizations: Passive superior glide and lateral to medial glide only until 6 wk
• No isolated hamstring strengthening if autograft used
• No OKC quadriceps strengthening for 6 weeks
Considerations:
• Edema/swelling control
• Scar massage
• Ankle, core, hip abduction and external rotation strength
• IT-Band stretch for tight lateral retinaculum
• Evaluate for excessive pronation of feet
• Patella taping only to exercise without pain ( if needed)
• Hamstring/gastroc stretches
Post-Operative-2 weeks
Gait • WBAT locked in extension at 0 degrees @4 weeks
ROM • Patella Glides Superior and medial
• No lateral patella glide
• 0-60 degrees AAROM only
• Heel slides (0-60 degrees) AAROM
• IT-Band stretch and soft tissue work
Strengthening • Quad sets
• Glute Sets
• SLR in Flexion, Abduction (Use brace if extensor lag in flexion)
• NMES to quad
Goals to 1. Full active quadriceps contraction with superior patellar glide
progress to 2. Full passive knee extension
next phase 3. WBAT in immobilizer (use crutches until safe without)
Weeks 4-6
Gait • Hinged brace max 90 degrees flex with WBAT—Normalize gait
ROM • 0-120 degrees AROM
• Patella Mobs
Strengthening • Bike-light resistance
• Closed-chain ex (TKE, calf press, lateral step ups, side-stepping, etc.)
o Wall squats/partial leg press (0-60 degrees)
Aerobic • Treadmill (walking progress with speed and incline-6 weeks post op)
Weeks 6-10
Gait • Discharge brace if no quad lag and normal gait
Weeks 10-16
Strengthening/ • Progress OKC and CKC quad strengthening
Dynamic • Progress core and hip strengthening
Control/ • Functional agilities-progressing to sport specific drills
Functional • Initiate walk to jog progression (when quadriceps index ≥ 80%, ROM is full, and pt is ≥ 12
Activities weeks post op) if:
o Full active knee extension
o Normal landing mechanics
o Strength to 80% of uninvolved side
Week 16
ROM • Maintain ROM equal to uninvolved
Strengthening • Emphasize performance of the quadriceps, hamstrings and trunk dynamic stability
• Emphasize muscle power generation and absorption
• Focus on activities that challenge muscle demand in intensity, frequency, and duration of
activity
• Emphasize sport- and position-specific activities
• Consider:
o Double leg and single leg activities and transitions
o Vary planes of movement and change of direction
o Perturbations and alter support surface (indoor and outdoor)
o Challenge multiple muscle groups (lower extremity and core) simultaneously
• Examples:
o Weight lifting: squats, leg extension, leg curl, leg press, deadlifts
o Lunges-forward, backward, rotational, side
o Rotational trunk exercises on static and dynamic surfaces
o Unilateral shuttle jumping with increasing resistance and mid-air rotations
Return to Sport • Emphasize appropriate symmetry in weight-bearing, joint loading and technique during
Activities performance of all therapeutic activities and plyometrics.
• Emphasize sport- and position-specific activities
o Add ball, racquet, stick
Consider Examples
o Impact loading and appropriate o Single-leg hop downs from increasing
attenuation strategy, cue regarding height (up to 12” box)
“hard” landings o Single-leg hop-holds (stable surface
o Double leg and single leg activities à Airex pad)
and transitions o Double and single-leg hopping onto
o Vary planes of movement and unstable surface (i.e. Airex pad) Tuck
change of direction jumps (focus on increasing multi-joint
flexion during landing and holding
stable position)
o 90º to 180º jumps
• Begin agility exercises between 50-75% (utilize visual feedback to improve mechanics)
o Side shuffling o Zig-zags
o Hopping o Resisted jogging (Sports Cord) in
o Carioca straight planes, etc
o Figure 8 o Back pedaling
PCL RECONSTRUCTION
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Rehabilitation Precautions
• Weight bearing as tolerated with brace locked in full extension 0-6 weeks.
• Isotonic strengthening
• Avoid isolated active/resistive hamstring strengthening for 5 months.
• Closed chain co-contraction activities may begin at 6 weeks.
• Posterolateral Corner Repair—Non weight bearing for 4 weeks, then increase weight bearing in brace
locked at 0º. Unlock brace at 6 weeks with goal of progressing out of brace by 8 weeks.
Post-operative: 0- 4 weeks
Bracing • Locked in full extension except for ROM activities.
ROM • Continue per patient ability – recumbent bike, upright bike, elliptical, treadmill
Strengthening • This sport-specific phase should transition from the rehab specialist in the
clinic to athletic trainer or sports performance specialist as appropriate.
• Continue sports specific agility exercises
• Progress gradually to 100% per tolerance
“How would you rank the function of your knee on the scale of 0 to 10 with 10 being normal, excellent function
and 0 being the inability to perform an of your usual daily activities which may include sports?”
Functional tests
1. Single hop for distance: Have the subject line their heel up with the zero mark of the tape measure,
wearing athletic shoes. The subject then hops as far as he can, landing on the same push off leg, for at
least 3 seconds. The arms are allowed to move freely during the testing. Allow him to perform 4 practice
hops on each leg. Then, have the subject perform 4 trials, recording each distance from the starting point
to the back of the heel. Average the distances for each limb.
2. Cross-over hop for distance: This test is set up with a 15cm strip, extending 6 meters. The subject lines
his heel up at the zero mark of the tape measure and hops 3 times on one foot, crossing over the center
line each time. Each subject should hop as far forward as he can on each hop, but only the total distance
hopped is recorded Allow the subject to perform 4 practice rounds before recording. Average the
distances for each limb.
Scoring
• Begin with the uninvolved leg. If using tape to mark distance, remove it before the next trial to
minimize visual cues.
• Greater than a 15% difference in average distance between the right and left limbs should be cause
for concern, indicating quad, and hamstring weaknesses that should be addressed prior to return to
sport.
• If patient fails test, evaluate and implement appropriate strength/stability/balance exercise strategies.
Once resolved, test again.
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Make sure your medical team provides you with the following before or
at your procedure:
• Crutches
• Walking boot
• Therapy appointment times
• Follow-up times
Post-procedure Care
• Plan to have a family member or friend drive you home after your procedure.
• Bring your crutches / scooter / boot to your procedure appointment.
Day 1 (day of • No weight bearing on treated • Protect your foot by resting and keeping it elevated to
your foot; use crutches/scooter and reduce swelling.
procedure) boot to get around.
Days 2-3 • Begin light partial weight • Elevate at least 3 times a day to control swelling. Begin
bearing, placing your foot on gentle ankle range of motion exercises 3 times per day.
the ground for balance; use
crutches/scooter and boot to
get around.
Orthotics/Braces
You do not need to sleep in boot. Do not drive while you are wearing the boot. If you have an orthosis, wear this
in your boot/shoe as you normally would.
Discomfort
Some pain after your procedure is expected for the first few weeks. Use an ice pack on the painful area for 15
minutes as needed; in the first 2-3 days consider icing 3 times daily. If you are concerned about your pain, please
contact your care team.
Bandage
• If a bandage/dressing was applied, remove dressing after 24-48 hours. Replace with simple bandage.
• Sterile strip bandages can be removed when they begin peeling off or after 7 days. Keep procedure area
clean and dry for 1 week after the procedure until your doctor has seen you for your wound check.
Bathing
Do not soak/submerge the foot in water for 1 week. Showering is OK, but keep incision site covered for the first
week.
Rehabilitation Precautions
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise. All restrictions and/or
precautions will be set by the referring surgeon, and will be based upon the stability of the repair and procedure
performed. All precautions are subject to change per physician instructions.
General Precautions
Dr. • Brace is locked to block flexion beyond what is tolerated by the repair, 0-6 weeks. This will
Kaeding be set by Dr. Kaeding in the O.R.
• 6-8 weeks post-op, push ROM to full flexion, blocking brace at just beyond what is achieved
in therapy.
• D/C brace once full flexion is achieved, and once patient can perform SLR without extensor
lag, after 6-8 week post-op period.
Dr. Jones • NWB with knee brace locked at 0 degrees for 6 weeks. Pt. may slowly progress to WBAT,
Dr. Bishop with brace locked, with crutches, per physician and therapist discretion.
• PROM may begin at 2 weeks post-op, progressing 20 degrees every 4-5 days, with goal of
90 degrees flexion achieved by 5-6 week post-op period.
• Brace unlocked fully by 6 weeks, and D/C’d once full flexion achieved, and patient can
perform SLR without extensor lag.
Dr. Miller • Pt. may slowly progress to WBAT, with brace locked, with crutches, per physician and
therapist discretion.
• Lock brace in full extension when ambulating. May unlock brace while sitting or for ROM
exercises 0-30 degrees. Further PROM may begin at 3 weeks post-op, progressing 20
degrees every 4-5 days, with goal of 90 degrees flexion achieved by 5-6 week post-op
period.
• Brace unlocked fully by 6 weeks, and D/C’d once full flexion achieved, and patient can
perform SLR without extensor lag.
Weeks 8-12 • May initiate terminal/end-range quadriceps stretching for quad tendon repairs
• Continue stationary bike for cardiac conditioning
• May initiate elliptical and/or stairmaster at 10 weeks
• Progress closed chain strengthening, bilateral to unilateral, eccentric to concentric
• Isolated isotonic quadriceps strengthening- leg extensions in protected range
• Proprioceptive activities - single leg stance on various surfaces
• Continue and progress core and hip stabilization
Goals:
1. Full ROM
2. Single leg stance for 30 seconds with good quad control
3. 5/5 strength of all other lower extremity musculature
Weeks 12-16 • Continue lower extremity endurance exercises
• Continue quadriceps PRE’s per patient tolerance
• Initiate partial weight bearing plyometrics (e.g. shuttle)- bilateral to unilateral, straight plane to
rotational
• May progress to bilateral FWB step downs, beginning with 2 inch block, if patient performs
partial weight bearing plyometrics with good mechanics and no reactive effusion/pain
• Slideboard
Goals:
1. Appropriate mechanics with above activities, without pain or reactive effusion
Weeks 16-24 • May initiate recreational swimming
• Initiate sports-specific exercise
• Progress hop downs bilateral to unilateral – progress step height per patient tolerance and
upon demonstration of normal mechanics/control
o Initiate jogging progression
• Criteria to begin jogging:
a. 20 single leg squats with good mechanic
b. 5/5 isometric strength
c. Perform 10 FWB single leg hops with good control, symmetric bilaterally
d. >7/10 on IKDC confidence scale
• Progress to dynamic functional activities: Figure-8, zig-zag, sideshuffle, grapevine. Begin at
25-50% intensity.
Criteria to 1. Full ROM and 5/5 lower extremity strength
return to 2. >85-90% performance of involved side versus uninvolved on functional hop testing, e.g.,
sport- single leg hop for distance; single leg 3-hop crossover test; 6-meter timed hop test
specific 3. >85-90% performance during isokinetic strength testing of involved versus uninvolved side
drills and
activities
UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (UKA) PROTOCOL
Background
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a procedure designed to relieve pain caused by joint
degeneration due to osteoarthritis involving only one compartment of the knee (medial, lateral, OR
patellofemoral). The knee joint is opened by splitting the joint capsule and the quad tendon if
needed. The procedure then involves resection of the arthritic bone and cartilage and
replacement with highly specialized metal (Cobalt-chromium alloy) components that are cemented to
the bone with a plastic (ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene) insert between the metal
components. This procedure preserves the remaining healthy bone, cartilage and ligaments of the
knee while selectively targeting the damaged area.
Impact activities are not recommended. Bicycling, golfing, walking, rowing (if flexion range of motion
allows), swimming, elliptical are encouraged.
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics, and
clinician evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Summary of Recommendations
Expectations • PT will begin in the hospital on the day of your surgery. You will transfer to outpatient
physical therapy 5-7 days after surgery.
• Return to impact activity is not recommended. “Knee friendly” activities including
bicycling, elliptical, golf and swimming.
Risk Factors • The patient should be monitored for signs and symptoms of DVT
• Emphasis should be placed on achieving full knee extension by end of Phase 1 and full
knee flexion by end of phase 2
Weight Bearing • The patient will be WBAT with an assistive device for the first 2-3 weeks. Assistive
Progression device should be discharged once full knee extension is achieved and the patient is able
to ambulate without obvious gait deviations
Range of Motion • 5-7 days post-op: 0-70°
Progression • 1-3 weeks post-op: 0-100°
• 3-6 weeks post-op: symmetrical extension, flexion 0-120°
• 6 weeks to return to PLOF: symmetrical and pain-free ROM
Patient Reported Collect at least one of the following at initial evaluation, every 6 weeks and discharge. Be
Outcomes consistant with which outcome tool is collected.
Red flags are signs/symptoms that require immediate referral for re-evaluation. Yellow flags are
signs/symptoms that require modification to plan of care.
Patients will begin rehabilitation in the hospital on the day of surgery. The patient should transfer the
outpatient physical therapy 5-7 days after surgery. Rehabilitation frequency is based on patient
progress, but typically occurs 1-2 times every week.
In this phase, focus is placed on restoring range of motion, ensuring proper wound healing and effusion management.
Interventions should address lower extremity strength, gait mechanics and safety with IADLs.
Precautions • Monitor for signs/symptoms of DVT
• Monitor incision for signs of infection
• No lunges x8 weeks
Goals • By 5-7 days post-op
o ROM: 0-70°
o Strength: Ability to perform independent straight leg raise (SLR)
• By 1-3 weeks post-op
o ROM: 0-100°
o Strength: Ability to perform SLR without evidence of extensor lag
Weight Bearing WBAT with assistive device until full knee extension is achieved and patient is able to
ambulate without obvious gait deviations
Suggested Interventions • ROM
o Extension: heel prop towel stretch, bag hangs, patellar mobilizations
o Flexion: heel slides, wall slides, active-assist flexion off edge of bed, upright
bike
• Strength
o Quad sets, SLR (4-way), SAQ, standing mini-squats, calf raises, shuttle
press, steamboats
• Effusion Management
o Ice, elevation, compression
NMES Parameters • NMES pads are placed on the proximal and distal quadriceps
(Do not initiate until • Patient: Seated with the knee in at least 60º flexion, shank secured with strap and
week 2-3) back support with thigh strap preferred. The ankle pad/belt should be two finger
widths superior to the lateral malleoli
-See Appendix B • The patient is instructed to relax while the e-stim generates at least 50% of their max
volitional contraction against a fixed resistance OR maximal tolerable amperage
without knee joint pain
10-20 seconds on/ 50 seconds off x 15 min
Cardiovascular • Upper body circuit training or upper body ergometer, if desired by patient
Endurance
Criteria to Progress to • Normal gait without assistive device on level indoor surfaces
Phase 2 • Full knee extension
• No evidence of extensor lag during SLR
• Able to perform double leg squat to 45° without upper extremity support
During Phase 2, emphasis is placed on increasing knee flexion ROM and improving quadriceps, gluteal and core
strength.
Precautions • Post-activity soreness should resolve within 24 hours
• No impact activities
• No lunges x8 weeks
Goals • Reciprocal stair negotiation by 6 weeks
• Return to work by 6 weeks
• Double leg sit to stand from a chair without upper extremity assist
• Single leg balance x15 seconds or greater OR ability to put socks on in standing
Range of Motion Extension: symmetrical to contralateral limb
Flexion: 0-120°
Weight Bearing Full weight bearing, no assistive device
Suggested Interventions • ROM
o Continue ROM strategies from Phase 1
• Strength
o SLR-Flexion progressions (semi-reclined or seated, add ER, eyes closed
for cortical training, speed, isometric holds), LAQ, side stepping, step ups,
step downs, sit to stands, wall sits
• Balance/Proprioception
o Double leg single leg
o Eyes open/eyes closed
o Compliant surfaces
• Effusion
o Continue effusion management strategies from Phase 1
• Continue NMES
Cardiovascular • Treadmill walking, elliptical, swimming if tolerated
Endurance o Incision must be healed and completely closed prior to swimming (typically
~4 weeks post-op)
Criteria to Progress to • Ambulation >2 blocks without assistive device
Phase 3 • Reciprocal gait on stairs by 6 weeks without upper extremity support
• Symmetrical ROM
• Double leg sit to stand without upper extremity support x10 repetitions
• Single leg balance x15 seconds or greater
During Phase 3, emphasis is placed on safely returning to prior level of function and knee-friendly activities
Appointments PT frequency will vary depending on progress. However, frequency may taper to one time
every 1-2 weeks during this phase.
Precautions • Post-activity soreness should resolve within 24 hours
• No impact activities
Goals • Ability to perform all IADL, work and non-impact sport related activity without
complaints of pain or evidence of reactive effusion
• Able to ambulate 1 mile or greater without pain, gait deviation or reactive effusion
Range of Motion Symmetrical and pain-free compared to contralateral limb
Weight Bearing FWBing without assistive device
Suggested Interventions • ROM
o Continue ROM strategies from Phase 1
• Strength
o Continue interventions from phases 1 and 2, leg press machine, hamstring
curl machine, knee extension machine, progress towards SL CKC
interventions per patient’s tolerance
• Balance/Proprioception
o Double leg single leg
o Eyes open/eyes closed
o Compliant surfaces
o Perturbations
o Chops/lifts/ball toss
• Effusion
o Continue effusion management strategies from Phase 1
Cardiovascular Replicate sport or work specific energy demands (non-impact only)
Endurance
Criteria to Return to • Normal gait on all surfaces and ability to walk 1 mile or greater without pain or
Non-Impact Sport reactive effusion
• Dynamic neuromuscular control with multi-plane activities without pain or reactive
effusion
1. Bohannon RW. Reference values for the Timed Up and Go Test: A Descriptive Meta-Analysis. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 2006;29(2):64-8.
2. Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the timed up & go test. Phys
Ther. 2000;80:896-903.
3. Kristensen MT, Foss NB, Kehlet H. Timed "Up and Go" Test as a predictor of falls within 6 months after hip fracture surgery. Phys Ther.
2007.87(1):24-30.
• Ideal for athletes with non-surgical injuries, post-surgical patients following Alter G or Deep Water
Running Progression, and runners that average 40-60 miles per week
• This guideline is intended for end stage rehabilitation return to running and the clinician should use their
own clinical judgement when it is safe to return the athlete to plyometrics and running
• Supplement with Alter G and Deep Water Running Progression for post-surgical patients
Guidelines • Prior to walk to run progression complete 5 minute dynamic warm-up (example at
wexnermedical.osu.edu/sports-medicine/treatments/endurance-medicine)
• Athlete must take at least one running off day in between each return to running
workout, non-impact cross training during off days
• Take at least one complete rest day a week
• If athlete develops pain, return of other symptoms, or cannot complete the phase they
remain at that phase until they are able to complete it without symptoms
• Complete only one phase per day
Advanced
Walk to Run Warm-up Run: Walk Repetitions Cool down Total Days
Program
Phase 1 5-10 min 4 min:1 min 2-4 5-10 min 20-30 min 2
Phase 2 5-10 min 6 min:1 min 2-4 5-10 min 25-35 min 2
Phase 3 5-10 min 8 min:1 min 2-4 5-10 min 30-40 min 2
Phase 4 5-8 min 10 min:1 min 2-4 5-8 min 35-45 min 2
Advanced
Running Day1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Total
Progression Miles
Week 1 2 - 2 - 3 - 3 10
Week 2 - 4 - 4 - 3 3 14
Week 3 - 5 - 5 4 - 4 16
Week 4 5 - 6 5 - 6 - 22
Week 5 6 - 7 7 - 9 4 32
Week 6 - 7 10 4 - 12 7 40
Advanced
Running Day1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Total
Progression Miles
Week 1 2 - 2 - 3 - 3 10
Week 2 - 4 - 4 - 3 3 14
Week 3 - 5 - 5 4 - 4 16
Week 4 5 - 6 5 - 6 - 22
Week 5 6 - 7 7 - 9 4 32
Week 6 - 7 10 4 - 12 7 40
References
Bates NA, Ford KR, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Impact differences in ground reaction force and center of mass
between the first and second landing phases of a drop vertical jump and their implications for injury risk
assessment. J Biomech. 2013;46(7):1237-41.
Brumitt J. A return to running program for the postpartum client: a case report. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice.
2009;25(4):310-325.
Fields KB, Sykes JC, Walker KM, Jackson JC. Prevention of running injuries. Current Sports Medicine Reports.
2010;9(3):176-182.
Fredericson M, Cookingham CL, Chaudhar AM, et al. Hip abductor weakness in distance runners with ITB. Cli. J.
Sport Med. 2000;10:169-175.
Gottschall JS, Kram R. Ground reaction forces during downhill and uphill running. Journal of Biomechanics.
2005;38:445-452.
Hreljac A. Etiology, prevention and early intervention of overuse injuries in runners: A biomechanical perspective.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005;16:651-667.
Ryan ED, Everett KL, Smith DB, et al. Acute effects of difference volumes of dynamic stretching on vertical jump
performance, flexibility and muscular endurance. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014;34(6):485-492.
Ryan MB, Maclean ML, Taunton JE. A review of anthropometric, biomechanical and neuromuscular and training
related factors associate with injury in runners. International Sportmed Journal. 2006;7(2):120-137.
Sim AY, Dawson BT, Guelfi KJ, et al. Effects of static stretching in warm-up on repeated sprint performance.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009;23(7):2155-2162.
Stracciolini A, Meehan WP, d’Hemecourt PA. Sports rehabilitation of the injured athlete. Clin Ped Emerg Med.
2007;8:43-53.
Warden SJ, Davis IS, Fredericson M. Management and prevention or bone stress injuries in long-distance
runners. JOSPT. 2014;44(10):749-765.
• Ideal for athletes with returning from surgical or non-surgical injuries and recreational runners that average
less than 20 miles per week.
• This guideline is intended for end stage rehabilitation return to running and the clinician should use their
own clinical judgment when it is safe to return the athlete to plyometrics and running.
• Supplement with Alter G and Deep Water Running Progression for post-surgical patients
Guidelines • Prior to walk to run progression complete 5 minute dynamic warm-up (example at
wexnermedical.osu.edu/sports-medicine/treatments/endurance-medicine)
• Athlete must take at least one running off day in between each return to running
workout, non-impact cross training during off days
• Take at least one complete rest day a week
• If athlete develops pain, return of other symptoms, or cannot complete the phase, they
remain at that phase until they are able to complete it without symptoms
• Complete only one phase per day
Basic Walk
to Run Warm-up Run:Walk Repetitions Cool down Total Days
Program
Phase 1 5-10 min 1 min:1-3 min 2-4 5-10 min 20-30 min 2
Phase 2 5-10 min 2 min:1-3 min 2-4 5-10 min 20-30 min 2
Phase 3 5-10 min 3 min:1-2 min 2-4 5-10 min 20-30 min 2
Phase 4 5-8 min 4 min:1 min 2-4 5-8 min 25-30 min 2
Phase 5 5-8 min 5 min:1 min 2-4 5-8 min 25-35 min 2
Basic Walk
to Run Warm-up Run:Walk Repetitions Cool down Total Days
Program
Phase 1 5-10 min 1 min:1-3 min 2-4 5-10 min 20-30 min 2
Phase 2 5-10 min 2 min:1-3 min 2-4 5-10 min 20-30 min 2
Phase 3 5-10 min 3 min:1-2 min 2-4 5-10 min 20-30 min 2
Phase 4 5-8 min 4 min:1 min 2-4 5-8 min 25-30 min 2
Phase 5 5-8 min 5 min:1 min 2-4 5-8 min 25-35 min 2
References
Bates NA, Ford KR, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Impact differences in ground reaction force and center of mass
between the first and second landing phases of a drop vertical jump and their implications for injury risk
assessment. J Biomech. 2013;46(7):1237-41.
Brumitt J. A return to running program for the postpartum client: a case report. Physiotherapy Theory and
Practice. 2009;25(4):310-325.
Fields KB, Sykes JC, Walker KM, Jackson JC. Prevention of running injuries. Current Sports Medicine Reports.
2010;9(3):176-182.
Fredericson M, Cookingham CL, Chaudhar AM, et al. Hip abductor weakness in distance runners with ITB. Cli. J.
Sport Med. 2000;10:169-175.
Gottschall JS, Kram R. Ground reaction forces during downhill and uphill running. Journal of Biomechanics.
2005;38:445-452.
Hreljac A. Etiology, prevention and early intervention of overuse injuries in runners: A biomechanical perspective.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005;16:651-667.
Ryan ED, Everett KL, Smith DB, et al. Acute effects of difference volumes of dynamic stretching on vertical jump
performance, flexibility and muscular endurance. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014;34(6):485-492.
Ryan MB, Maclean ML, Taunton JE. A review of anthropometric, biomechanical and neuromuscular and training
related factors associate with injury in runners. International Sportmed Journal. 2006;7(2):120-137.
Sim AY, Dawson BT, Guelfi KJ, et al. Effects of static stretching in warm-up on repeated sprint performance.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009;23(7):2155-2162.
Stracciolini A, Meehan WP, d’Hemecourt PA. Sports rehabilitation of the injured athlete. Clin Ped Emerg Med.
2007;8:43-53.
Warden SJ, Davis IS, Fredericson M. Management and prevention or bone stress injuries in long-distance
runners. JOSPT. 2014;44(10):749-765.
CERVICAL MANIPULATION CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Purpose: To create a document of clinical practice guidelines for physical therapists in The Ohio State
University network to utilize and reference when establishing patient safety and appropriateness for cervical
manipulation based on the most recent literature recommendations.
Proposed 1. Mechanical
Benefits • Increase joint space, improve range of motion, improve biomechanics,
decrease soft tissue tone
2. Neurophysiological
• Modulate nerve activity in afferent fibers, alter sympathetic activity, elicit
hypoalgesic response, increase descending inhibition mechanisms
3. Psychological
• Patients with a high positive expectation of success regarding manual
therapy may obtain psychological benefits
Contraindications 1. Contraindications
and Precautions • Worsening neurological function
• Upper motor neuron lesion
• Spinal cord damage
• Multi-level nerve root pathology
• Unremitting night pain
• Relevant recent trauma
• Unremitting, severe non-mechanical pain
• Patient refuses to give consent
• Evidence of suspected cervical artery dissection
2. Precautions
• Hypermobility syndromes
• Local infections
• Osteoporosis/Osteopenia
• Active or history of cancer
• Age > 55 years old
• Long-term corticosteroid use
• Inflammatory disease
• High fear avoidance behaviors
Indications
Possible
Indications
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/category/chiropractic/
Positioning 1. Maximal cervical extension and rotation combined provide the greatest strain on the
vertebral artery
2. Evidence suggests the strain on vertebral arteries during manipulation is similar to that
of the strain during general ROM testing
3. Positioning of the neck may be more significant than the actual thrust manipulation
when determining risk
Can we ever 1. There seems to be no compelling evidence that clinical examination findings or even
be 100% sure? results of an ultrasonography can identify patients at risk for VBI, so thorough clinical
reasoning and shared decision-making with the patient must always be utilized by the
therapist
Documentation 1. When documenting a cervical manipulation, must include:
• Consent obtained
• Technique used
• Set up / Utilization of pre-manipulative hold
• Grade
• Patient response
Patient 1. Estimated that 20-45% of patients can expect minor to moderate adverse events
Response following manual therapy intervention, with 50% of those resolving within 48 hours.
2. Common minor to moderate symptoms
• Worsening of neck/shoulder pain
• Dizziness
• Light-headedness
3. Onset of severe headache, severe neck pain, slurred speech or onset of paralysis or
numbness could indicate possible artery dissection
• If these symptoms occur and persist, the therapist must monitor the patient
closely and ensure they receive emergency care immediately
Manipulation 1. Gross et al 2004 systematic review determined there is currently not sufficient research
vs. indicating the superiority of either mode of treatment
Mobilization 2. Gross et al updated 2015 systematic review provided following conclusions:
• Multiple sessions of cervical manipulation produced similar changes in pain,
function, QOL, global perceived effect and patient satisfaction when compared
to multiple sessions of cervical mobilizations at all follow-up time frames
• For acute and sub-acute neck pain, multiple sessions of cervical manipulation
may be more beneficial in improving pain and function than some medications
• For sub-acute and chronic neck pain, cervical mobilization alone may not be
different from ultrasound, TENS, acupuncture, or massage
Manipulation 1. Gross et al: Strong evidence to support use of multi-modal treatment consisting of
vs. cervical mobilization and/or manipulation plus exercise when compared to wait-and-see
Exercise approach
2. Hoving et al: Patients with nonspecific neck pain > 2 weeks in duration
• Manual therapy-only group showed significantly better outcomes than exercise-
only group and group who continued with their primary practitioner
Cervicogenic 1. Gross et al: For chronic CGH, multiple sessions of cervical manipulation may be more
Headaches effective than massage and TENS in pain reduction at immediate and short-term follow-
up
2. Dunning et al: Upper cervical manipulation and upper thoracic manipulation group
showed significantly greater reduction in headache intensity and disability at 3-month
follow-up than mobilization + exercise group
Thoracic 1. Gross et al: Thoracic manipulation significantly reduced pain in patients with acute and
Manipulation sub-acute neck pain
2. B level evidence in 2017 Neck Pain CPG for variety of neck conditions (see Appendix A)
3. Usually mid to upper thoracic manipulations utilized for cervical pain conditions
4. Nielsen et al: No reports of life-threatening or ‘severe’ adverse events from thoracic
manipulation
McKenzie 1. Numerous studies have investigated the effectiveness of the McKenzie method for low
Approach back pain in comparison to manual therapy, but similar studies are currently lacking for
cervical pain
Example Plan of Care/Progression for Appropriate Patient
First Visit 1. It is advised to avoid performing cervical manipulation during the initial visit
2. Recent research gives support to building therapeutic alliance (TA) with a patient, even
suggesting patient-reported level of TA is a significant predictor of outcomes in back
pain
3. Suggested/possible initial manual interventions:
• Cervical mobilizations
• Thoracic mobilizations
• Cervico-thoracic junction mobility
• Sub occipital release techniques
• SNAGS
• Upper cervical flexion-rotation MET
Second Visit 1. Suggested/possible manual interventions:
• Cervical mobilizations
• Thoracic manipulation
• Cervico-thoracic junction manipulation
Third Visit 1. Cervical manipulation if patient is indicated
• Waiting a few visits allows time to gauge patient response to prior manual
interventions, build therapeutic alliance, and increase patient trust
Fourth Visit 1. Always re-assess patient at the beginning of the visit following a cervical manipulation to
measure patient response and change in status
2. Continue with interventions as appropriate based on patient response
***This example progression is not an all-inclusive approach and does not take in to account specific patient
presentations; instead, it aims to provide a framework for clinical decision-making and the implementation of
proper progression of forces prior to performing a cervical manipulation
Appendix B
2017 American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines
Appendix C
Canadian C-Spine Rule
Appendix D
Example manual techniques: All techniques should be performed by a licensed Physical Therapist
Patient position: Supine with arms folded across the chest, far arm
on top. Towels can be used between patient’s chest and arms as
needed to create “V” posture.
Therapist: Roll patient towards you, reach around thorax and place
contact point at targeted level. Roll patient back to neutral.
Patient’s elbows should point vertical and be directly anterior to the
segment you are targeting. Contact epigastric region onto the
patient’s elbows. The HVLA thrust is provided directly anterior to
posterior.
Thrust: Into rotation toward the mouth with the thrust hand while
simultaneously rapidly supinating opposite forearm
• Population
o Chronic pain is defined as persistent pain that extends beyond normal tissue healing time greater than
three to six months (Ratter, 2014). Patients with persistent pain can have reduced or complete disability
in normal daily activities including self-care activities, household chores, cooking, grocery shopping,
driving, and sexual dysfunction (Ratter, 2014). Patients included in this clinical practice guideline are any
patients with persistent pain including but not limited to the musculoskeletal, neuromuscular,
inflammatory, or visceral/genitourinary tract systems. Common diagnoses seen in patients with
persistent pain include fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome, migraines, headaches, peripheral
pain including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and the vast array of spine pain disorders including
cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine pain (Nijs, 2015).
• Diagnosis/Classification
o Neuropathic Pain- pain caused by damage or disease affecting the somatosensory nervous system.
Neuropathic pain may be associated with abnormal sensations called dysesthesia or pain from normally
non-painful stimuli (allodynia). It may have continuous and/or episodic components.
Peripheral- nerve pain that is a symptom of damage or dysfunction of the peripheral nervous
system, which is the vast network of nerves that send messages to and from the central nervous
system. Examples include complex regional pain syndrome, metabolic disorders, and phantom
limb.
Central- nerve pain or symptoms which are neurological and caused by a dysfunction that
specifically affects the central nervous system, which includes the brain, brainstem and spinal
cord. Examples include Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, post-stroke pain, fibromyalgia,
and myelopathies.
o Musculoskeletal Pain- pain that can affect bones, muscles, ligaments, tendons, and nerves.
Musculoskeletal pain can be localized in one area, or widespread. Pain can be caused from injury,
overuse, poor posture, and/or prolonged immobilization. Examples can include low back pain, myalgia,
Myofascial Pain Syndrome, stress fractures, and tendonitis.
o Inflammatory Pain- localized reaction that produces redness, warmth, swelling, and pain as a result of
infection, irritation, or injury. Inflammation can be external or internal. Examples can include
arthropathies, infection, post-operative pain, and tissue injuries.
• Fear is a distressing negative experience induced by a perceived threat. The most commonly used outcome
measure for fear is the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). The FABQ is designed to quantify fear
and avoidance beliefs in individuals with chronic pain. The FABQ has two subscales to measure fear-avoidance
beliefs about work and physical activity. The higher the score represents an increase in fear-avoidance beliefs.
(Burton, W et al., 1999) (Fritz, et al. 2002)
o Chronic pain is one of the most common disabling and persistent pain diagnoses (Baird, Sheffield,
2016). Beliefs about one’s pain and ability to cope with pain determine physical and mental health
outcomes in patients with chronic pain (Baird, Sheffield, 2016). The Brief Pain Inventory has been
found to be responsive to detecting and reflecting improvement in pain over time for chronic
nonmalignant pain. The Brief Pain Inventory maintains consistency and validity of measuring pain
intensity and pain interference within chronic pain patients. The measure is also considerably sensitive to
detecting and measuring changes in pain, such as demonstrating improvement (Tan, 2004).
o The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is multi-dimensional and considers rumination, magnification, and
helplessness as important components of catastrophizing. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a robust
tool that has clinical and non-clinical applications and seems to generalize across populations and
cultures (Van Damme, 2002). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a useful measure for predicting pain
intensity (Sullivan, 1995).
o Based on completion rates, distances walked, reliability and the high correlation between the distance
walked in 2 and 6 minutes, the distance walked over 2 minutes can be considered to be a legitimate
alternative to the distance walked over 6 minutes for indicating functional endurance among relatively
healthy community-dwelling individuals. Even if the 6 minute walk test is used, it may be useful to
document 2 minute walk test distance so that useful information is still obtained from individuals unable
to complete the full 6MWT (Bohannon, R, et al, 2014).
o Interdisciplinary Chronic Pain Program uses the integration of physical rehabilitation, psychosocial,
and medical interventions combined to create the most cost-effective and clinically-effective long term
care (Gatchel, 2014). A systematic review found intensive (>100) hours of multidisciplinary
biopsychosocial rehabilitation with functional restoration resulted in greater pain reduction and function
for patients with chronic, disabling low back pain (Guzman, 2001). Self-management interventions to
reduce pain limitations and improve physical activity have strong evidence for treatment of chronic
musculoskeletal pain conditions (Smith, 2016). Interventions should be focused on disrupting the vicious
cycle of fear avoidance behavior, pain, and disability (Bunzil, et al., 2017).
o Pain Neuroscience Education is used to treat patients with pain by changing cognitions, beliefs, and
fear before engaging a movement based approach of therapeutic exercise, graded exposure and pacing,
guided motor imagery, cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapies (Louw,
Diehere, et al., 2011). The goal is to decrease fear and catastrophization. Pain neuroscience education
is an educational intervention which aims to reduce pain and disability by explaining the biology of the
pain experience to a patient (Moseley, 2005. Ryan, G et al., 2010).
Delivery Methods
• Verbal instruction (1:1 is most effective)
• Duration & Frequency: 10-15 minutes; 1-2x/week; 1x/week when interspersed with
homework
• Group Sessions can be performed but should not exceed 12 patients, patients need to
be like-minded and can be seen 1x/week for 6-8 week.
o Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) is an intervention that may be effective for patients with persistent pain by
treating their cortical disruption (Bowering, 2013). The goal of GMI is to target cortical disruption and
normalize sensory stimulation without triggering the pain response (Bowering, 2013). GMI increases
cortical and spinal motor excitability. Visual input enhances tactile sensitivity. There is currently limited
evidence to support GMI and mirror therapy for treatment of chronic pain; however, early research does
support improvement in pain compared to traditional physical therapy interventions (Bowering, 2012).
Evidence demonstrates an increased analgesic benefit for individuals with Complex Regional Pain
Syndrome presenting with symptoms for 1 year or less (McCabe, 2008).
Delivery Methods
• GMI should be organized starting with left-right discrimination, motor imagery, and then
mirror therapy.
• Duration & Frequency: Daily practice for optimal results; duration should be increased
per patient tolerance (may only tolerate 1-2 minutes at first to not experience increased
pain) (Moseley, G, et al., 2012)
o Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the prevailing psychological treatment for individuals with
chronic pain (Edhe, 2014). CBT focuses on the development of personal coping strategies that target
solving current problems and changing unhelpful patterns in cognitions (e.g. thoughts, beliefs, and
attitudes), behaviors, and emotional regulation. Depression and physical disability are found to be
directly linked to self-efficacy beliefs (Asghari, 2008). CBT focuses on reducing maladaptive behaviors,
improving thoughts and beliefs, and increasing self-efficacy for pain management (Turner and Romano,
2001). CBT is effective in reducing pain and distress, and reducing disability in systematic and meta-
analysis reviews (Edhe, 2014). Multiple trials have shown that CBT is more effective for pain, functional
status, and behavioral outcomes than placebo or no treatment (Airaksinen, 2006).
o Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a type of behavior therapy that is used to treat chronic
pain and conditions that often go along with pain, such as anxiety, depression, and substance use
problems. ACT is an evidence-based treatment for chronic pain. ACT does not aim to reduce pain
intensity, but rather increase pain acceptance and reduce avoidance due to pain (Veehof, 2011). ACT is
a promising alternative to CBT, particularly in older populations. Mindfulness training can be a
particularly useful tool in restructuring patients’ avoidance cognitions, so that they can return to activities
of value despite pain (Okifuji, 2015). The literature is limited, but there is an indication that cognitive
reconstruction and acceptance allow for a greater pain tolerance, both in acute and chronic pain settings.
Acceptance seems to be effective in both settings (Kohl, 2014).
o Aquatic Therapy is an advantageous intervention for patients with chronic pain due to its anti-gravity
effects to minimize compressive forces and promote muscle strengthening, aerobic exercise, increase
blood circulation, reduce pain and improve quality of life (Lim, 2010). A randomized controlled trial found
after an eight week program, three times per week for 40 minutes consisting of aerobic exercise and
lower extremity strengthening exercises resulted in greater body mass reduction, reduced pain and
improved compliance and consistency (Lim, 2010). Benefits have been found to reduce pain, improve
mood, increase quality of life and increase aerobic capacity when treating patients with fibromyalgia
(Assis, 2006). Patients with chronic low back pain have improved disability and increased quality of life
compared to land-based therapy (Dundar, 2009), and a meta-analysis found moderate effect in reducing
pain, improving quality of life and physical function (Barker, 2014).
Duration & Frequency: 3x/week for 8 weeks of 40 minute sessions for greater body mass
reduction, reduced pain and improved compliance and consistency (Lim, 2010)
o Tai Chi has been shown to be beneficial for the treatment of chronic pain (Hall, 2011). Tai Chi is a
blanket term that has many variations that have different intensities, and an understanding of the type of
Tai Chi being performed is needed to appropriately place a chronic pain patient in the correct group.
Research shows that slow motion and weight shifting can improve musculoskeletal strength and stability
which therein are effective in decreasing associated pain and restrictions. Significant positive results for
treatment in chronic pain were found for low back pain, osteoporosis, and osteoarthritis (Kong, 2016)
(Lee, 2009).
o Yoga has been shown by several studies to offer significantly better pain reduction than usual care,
education, or conventional exercises (Posadzki, 2011). Combines postural awareness, breathing
techniques, and meditation or relaxation to significantly better pain reduction. Positive effect sizes of
yoga on all pain-related disorders as measured by pain intensity/frequency and pain-associated
disability. Yoga also demonstrates a positive effect with diminished anxiety, greater improvements in
functional disability, and depression (Dunleavy, 2016).
Algorithm Appendix **
• Patient History
o Description of current pain, including time of onset
o Systemic diseases check (osteoporosis, cancer, arthritis, infection, etc.)
o Neurological symptoms
o Bowel/bladder symptoms
o Biological and psychosocial risk factors
• (G) 8 Week Group Therapy Program- refer to Chronic Pain Rehabilitation Program flyer
Attendance Policy: If you miss more than 2 appointments, you may be asked to participate at a later date. If for
whatever reason you are unable to attend, please contact Dr. Laurie Greco at (614) 366-8358.
Treatment Format:
• Eight (8) group sessions led by a clinical-health psychologist, physical therapist, and other members of the
treatment team, including: resident physician, clinical pharmacist, registered dietitian, and social worker
• Individual counseling, nutrition and pharmacy consultation, and case management services are available as-
needed
For more information about the OSU Family Medicine Chronic Pain Rehabilitation Program, please speak
with your provider or contact Dr. Laurie Greco at (614) 366-8358
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (“ACT”) is the treatment approach used in the CPRP program. ACT is a type
of behavior therapy or “talk therapy” that is used to treat chronic pain and conditions that often go along with pain, such
as anxiety, depression, and substance use problems. ACT is considered an evidence-based treatment for chronic
pain. Research has shown that ACT is an effective approach for people living with chronic pain and related conditions.
For more ACT, please visit the website: www.contextualscience.org.
Anna Lucia Barker, PhD, Jason Talevski, BHealth Sci (Public Health), Renata Teresa Morello, MPH, Caroline
Anne Brand, MPH, Ann Elizabeth Rahmann, PhD, Donna Michelle Urquhart, PhD. Effectiveness of Aquatic
Exercise for Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Meta-Analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
2014; 95: 1776-86.
Asghari A, Julaeiha S and Godarsi M. Disability and depression in patients with chronic pain: pain or pain-related
beliefs? Arch Iran Med. 2008; 11(3): 263-269.
Baird A and Sheffield D. The Relationship between Pain Beliefs and Physical and Mental Health Outcome
Measures in Chronic Low Back Pain: Direct and Indirect Effects. Healthcare (Basel). 2016; 14(3).
Bowering KJ, O’Connell NE, Tabor A, et al. The Effects of Graded Motor Imagery and Its Components of Chronic
Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. The Journal of Pain. November 19, 2012.
Bunzil S, Smith A, Schutze R, et al. Making Sense of Low Back Pain and Pain-Related Fear. JOSPT. September
2017. 47 (9): 628-636.
Bussing, A, Ostermann, T, Ludke, R, Michalsen, A. Effects of Yoga Interventions of Pain and Pain-Associated
Disability: A Meta-Analysis. J of Pain. 2012; 13(1):1-4.
Butland RJ, Pang J, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, Geddes DM. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory
disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982; 284(6329):1607-1608.
Cox, H, Tilbrook, H, Aplin, J, Semlyen, A, Togerson, D, Trewhela, A, Watt, I. A randomised controlled trial of yoga
for the treatment of chronic low back pain: Results of a pilot study. Complementary Therapies in Clin Prac. 2010;
16: 187-193.
Deyo, RA, Walsh NE, et al. A Controlled Trial of Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Exercise for
Chronic Low Back Pain. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1990; 322; 1627-1634.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199006073222303#t=article
Edhe DM, Dilworth TM and Turner JA. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Individuals with Chronic Pain- Efficacy,
Innovations and Directions for Research. American Psychologist. 2014; 69(2): 153-166.
Fransen, Marlene, Nairn Lillias, Winstanley Julie, Lam Paul, Edmond John. Physical Activity for Osteoarthritis
Management: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating Hydrotherapy or Tai Chi Classes. Arthritis and
Rheumatism. 2007; 57(3): 407-414.
Geytenbeek Jenny. Evidence for Effective Hydrotherapy. Physiotherapy. 2002; 88(9): 514-528.
Gusi N, Tomas-Carus P, Kkinen A, Kkinen K, Ortega-Alonso A. Exercise in Waist-High Warm Water Decreases
Pain and Improves Health-Related Quality of Life and Strength in the Lower Extremities in Women With
Fibromyalgia. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2006; 55(1): 66-73.
Guzman, J, Rosmin E, Karjalainen K, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic
review. BMJ. 2001; 322: 1511.
Hall AM, Maher CG, Lam P, Ferreira M, Latimer J. Tai chi exercise for treatment of pain and disability in people
with persistent low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res. 2011; 63(11): 1576-1583.
Hall Jane, PhD, MPhil, MCSP, Swinkels Annette, PhD, MCSP, Briddon Jason, MA, MCLIP, McCabe Candida S.,
PhD, RGN. Does Aquatic Exercise Relieve Pain in Adults With Neurologic
or Musculoskeletal Disease? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Archives
of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2008; 89: 873-883.
Hayden JA, Maurits W, Tomlinson G. Systematic Review: Strategies for Using Exercise Therapy to Improve
Outcomes in Chronic Low Back Pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 142(9): 776-785.
Jae-Young Lim, MD, PhD, Esther Tchai, PhD, Soong-Nang Jang, RN, MPH, PhD. Effectiveness of Aquatic
Exercise for Obese Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled
Trial. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2010; 2: 723-731.
Janssen, W, Bussmann, H, Stam, H. Determinants of the SIt-to-Stand Movement: A Review. Phys Ther. 2002
;82(9): 866-79.
Kohl, A. Rief, W. Glombiewski, J. Acceptance, Congnititve Restructuring, and Distraction as Coping Strategies for
Acute Pain. The Journal of Pain. 2013; 3: 305-315.
Kohl, A. Rief, W. Glombiewski, J. Do fibromyalgia patients benefit from cognitive restructuring and acceptance?
An experimental study Journal of Behavior and Experimental Psychiatry . 2014; 45: 467-474
Kong LJ, Lauche R, Klose P, et al. Tai Chi for Chronic Pain Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
of Randomized Controlled Trials. Sci Rep. 2016 ;6(April): 1-9.
Kosak M, Smith T. Comparison of the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev.
2004; 41(1): 103.
Lee H-J, Park H-J, Chae Y, et al. Tai Chi Qigong for the quality of life of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a pilot,
randomized, waiting list controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23(6): 504-511.
Lunde, L, Nordhus, I. Combining Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for the
Treatment of Chronic Pain in Older Adults. Clinical Case Studies. August 2009; 8(4): 296-308.
Marcos Renato Assis, Luciana Eduardo Silva, Adriana Martins Barros Alves, Ana Paula Pessanha, Vale’ria Valim,
Daniel Feldman, Turi’bio Leite de Barros Neto, Jamil Natour. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Deep Water
Running: Clinical Effectiveness of Aquatic Exercise to Treat Fibromyalgia. Arthritis and Rheumatism. February
2006; 55(1): 57-65.
McCabe, Candida S., Haigh, Richard C., Blake, David R. Mirror Visual Feedback for the Treatment of Complex
Regional Pain Syndrome (Type I). Current Pain and Headache Reports. 2008; 12: 103-107.
McCracken, L, Sato, A, Taylor, G. A Trial of a Brief Group-Based Form of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
(ACT) for Chronic Pain in General Practice: Pilot Outcome and Process Results. The Journal of Pain. November
2013; 14(11): 1398-1406.
Michalsen, A, Traitteur, H, Ludtke, R, Brunnhuber, S, Meier, L, Jeitler, M, Bussing, A, Kessler, C. Yoga for
Chronic Neck Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J of Pain. 2012; 13(11): 1122-1130.
Mosely GL, Butler DS, Beames TB, Giles TJ. The graded motor imagery handbook. NOIgroup Publications.
Adelaide, Australia, 2012.
Nijs JO, Girbes EL, Lundberg M, Malfliet A and Sterling M. Exercise therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain:
Innovation by altering pain memories. Manual Therapy. 2015; 20: 216-220.
Nnoaham KE, Kumbang J. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain (Review). The
Cochrane Collaboration. 2010.
Okifuji, A, Turk, D. Behavioral and Cognitive-Behavioral Approaches to Treating Patients with Chronic Pain:
Thinking Outside the Pill Box. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. 2015; 33: 218-38.
Peterson, T, Kryger P, Ekdahl C, Olsen S and Jacobsen S. The Effect of McKenzie Therapy as Compared With
That of Intensive Strengthening Training for the Treatment of Patients With Subacute or Chronic Low Back Pain:
A Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine. 2002; 27(16): 1702-1709.
Posadzki P, Ernst E. Yoga for low back pain; a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Clin Rheumatol.
2011:30 (9):1257-1262.
Posadzki, P, Ernst, E, Terry, R, Soo Lee, M. Is yoga effective for pain? A systematic review of randomized clinical
trials. Contemporary Therapies in Medicine. 2011; 19: 281-87.
Ramasamy A, Martin ML, Blum SI, Liedgens H, Argoff C, Freynhagen R, Wallace, M et al. Assessment of Patient-
Reported Outcome Instruments to Assess Chronic Low Back Pain. Pain Med. 2017; 18(6): 1098-1110.
Rosario, J, Orcesi, L, Kobayashi, F, Aun A, Assumpcao, I, Blasioli, J, Hanada, E. The immediate effects of
modified Yoga positions on musculoskeletal pain relief. J of Bodywork & Movement Therapies. 2013; 17: 469-74.
Smeets, R, Hijdra, H, Kester, M, Hitters, M, Knottnerus, A. The usability of six physical performance tasks in a
rehabilitation population with chronic low back pain. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2006; 20: 987-96.
Smith, et al. Should exercises be painful in the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain? A systematic
review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports
Medicine.http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2017/07/12/bjsports-2016-097383
Somers-Grimmer, K, Prior, M and Robertson, J. Yellow flag scores in a compensable New Zealand cohort
suffering acute low back pain. Journal of Pain Research. 2008; I: 15-25.
Song R, Lee EO, Lam P, Bae SC. Effects of tai chi exercise on pain, balance, muscle strength, and perceived
difficulties in physical functioning in older women with osteoarthritis: A randomized clinical trial. J Rheumatol.
2003; 30(9): 2039-2044.
Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and Validation. Psychol Assess.
1995; 7 (4): 524-532.
Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the brief pain inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain.
The Journal of Pain. 2004; 5(2): 133-137.
Tekur, P, Nagarathna, R, Chametcha S, Hankey, A, Nagendra H. A comprehensive yoga program improves pain,
anxiety and depression in chronic low back pain patients more than exercise: An RCT. Complementary Therapies
in Medicine. 2012; 20: 107-118.
Lumbar stabilization greater than Pilates and dynamic strengthening for chronic LBP
https://www.e-sciencecentral.org/articles/SC000026761
Umit Dundar, MD, Ozlem Solak, MD, Ilknur Yigit, MD, Deniz Evcik, MD,and Vural Kavuncu, MD. Clinical
Effectiveness of Aquatic Exercise to Treat Chronic Low Back Pain, A Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine. 2009;
34(14): 1436-40.
Van Damme S, Crombez G, Bijttebier P, Goubert L, Van Houdenhove B. A confirmatory factor analysis of the
Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Invariant factor structure across clinical and non-clinical population. Pain. 2002;
96(3): 319-342.
vanMiddelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Verhagen AP, Ostelo RW, Koes BW, vanTulder MW. Exercise therapy for
chronic nonspecific low-back pain. Best Prac Res Clin Rheumatol 2010:24 (2):193-204.
Veehof, M, Oskam, MJ, Schreurs, K, Bohlmeijer, E. Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic
pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2011; 152: 533-42.
Vowles, K, Witkiewitz, K, Sowden, G. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain: Evidence of
Mediation and Clinically Significant Change Following an Abbreviated Interdisciplinary Program of Rehabilitation.
The Journal of Pain. January 2014; 15(1): 101-113.
For OSUWMC USE ONLY. To license, please
contact the OSU Technology Commercialization
Office at https://tco.osu.edu.
Waller, Benjamin, Lambeck Johan, Daly Daniel. Clinical Rehabilitation. Therapeutic aquatic exercise in the
treatment of low back pain: a systematic review. 2009; 23: 3-14.
Williams, K, Abildso, C, Steinberg, L, Doyle E, Epstein, B, Smith, D, Hobbs,G, Gross, R, Kelley, G, Cooper, L.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficacy of Iyengar Yoga Therapy on Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine. 2009;
34(19): 2066-76.
Zou L, Wang C, Chen K, et al. The effect of Tai chi practice on attenuating bone mineral density loss: A
systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(9).
• Ideal for athletes with non-surgical injuries, post-surgical patients following Alter G or Deep Water Running
Progression and runners that average 20-40 miles per week
• This guideline is intended for end stage rehabilitation return to running and the clinician should use their
own clinical judgement when it is safe to return the athlete to plyometrics and running
• Supplement with Alter G and Deep Water Running Progression for post-surgical patients
Guidelines • Prior to walk to run progression complete 5 minute dynamic warm-up (example at
wexnermedical.osu.edu/sports-medicine/treatments/endurance-medicine)
• Athlete must take at least one running off day in between each return to running
workout, non-impact cross training during off days
• Take at least one complete rest day a week
• If athlete develops pain, return of other symptoms, or cannot complete the phase they
remain at that phase until they are able to complete it without symptoms
• Complete only one phase per day
Intermediate
Walk to Run Warm-up Run:Walk Repetitions Cool down Total Days
Program
Phase 1 5-10 min 2 min:1-2 min 2-4 5-10 min 20-30 min 2
Phase 2 5-10 min 4 min:1-2 min 2-4 5-10 min 25-35 min 2
Phase 3 5-10 min 6 min:1-2 min 2-4 5-10 min 30-40 min 2
Phase 4 5-8 min 8 min:1-2 min 2-4 5-8 min 35-45 min 2
Intermediate
Running Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Total
Progression Miles
Week 1 - 1 - 2 - 2 - 5
Week 2 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 9
Week 3 - 4 - 3 - 4 - 11
Week 4 5 - 4 3 - 5 - 17
Week 5 5 - 6 4 - 5 - 20
Intermediate
Walk to Run Warm-up Run:Walk Repetitions Cool down Total Days
Program
Phase 1 5-10 min 2 min:1-2 min 2-4 5-10 min 20-30 min 2
Phase 2 5-10 min 4 min:1-2 min 2-4 5-10 min 25-35 min 2
Phase 3 5-10 min 6 min:1-2 min 2-4 5-10 min 30-40 min 2
Phase 4 5-8 min 8 min:1-2 min 2-4 5-8 min 35-45 min 2
Intermediate
Running Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Total
Progression Miles
Week 1 - 1 - 2 - 2 - 5
Week 2 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 9
Week 3 - 4 - 3 - 4 - 11
Week 4 5 - 4 3 - 5 - 17
Week 5 5 - 6 4 - 5 - 20
References
Bates NA, Ford KR, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Impact differences in ground reaction force and center of mass
between the first and second landing phases of a drop vertical jump and their implications for injury risk
assessment. J Biomech. 2013;46(7):1237-41.
Brumitt J. A return to running program for the postpartum client: a case report. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice.
2009;25(4):310-325.
Fields KB, Sykes JC, Walker KM, Jackson JC. Prevention of running injuries. Current Sports Medicine Reports.
2010;9(3):176-182.
Fredericson M, Cookingham CL, Chaudhar AM, et al. Hip abductor weakness in distance runners with ITB. Cli. J.
Sport Med. 2000;10:169-175.
Gottschall JS, Kram R. Ground reaction forces during downhill and uphill running. Journal of Biomechanics.
2005;38:445-452.
Hreljac A. Etiology, prevention and early intervention of overuse injuries in runners: A biomechanical perspective.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005;16:651-667.
Ryan ED, Everett KL, Smith DB, et al. Acute effects of difference volumes of dynamic stretching on vertical jump
performance, flexibility and muscular endurance. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014;34(6):485-492.
Ryan MB, Maclean ML, Taunton JE. A review of anthropometric, biomechanical and neuromuscular and training
related factors associate with injury in runners. International Sportmed Journal. 2006;7(2):120-137.
Sim AY, Dawson BT, Guelfi KJ, et al. Effects of static stretching in warm-up on repeated sprint performance.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009;23(7):2155-2162.
Stracciolini A, Meehan WP, d’Hemecourt PA. Sports rehabilitation of the injured athlete. Clin Ped Emerg Med.
2007;8:43-53.
Warden SJ, Davis IS, Fredericson M. Management and prevention or bone stress injuries in long-distance
runners. JOSPT. 2014;44(10):749-765.
Facts
Risk Factors
Strong Moderate Weak
• Fracture (pelvis, femur, • Arthroscopic knee surgery • Bed rest > 3 days
tibia) • Central venous lines • Immobility due to sitting
• Hip or knee replacement • Chemotherapy • Increasing age
• Major general surgery • Congestive heart or respirator failure • Laproscopic surgery
• Major trauma • Malignancy • Obesity
• Oral contraceptive therapy • Varicose veins
• Cerebrovascular accident
• Pregnancy/postpartum
• Previous venous thromboembolism
a
Clinical Finding Score
a
Score interpretation: Greater than or equal 0 = probability of proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (PDVT) of 3%
(95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7%-5.9%), 1 or 2 = probability of PDVT of 17% (95% CI = 12- 23%), Greater than or equal to
3 = probability of PDVT of 75% (95% CI = 63-84%).
b
Tenderness along the deep venous system is assessed by firm palpation in the center of the posterior calf, the popliteal
space, and along the area of the femoral vein in the anterior thigh and groin.
c
Measured 10 cm below tibial tuberosity
d
Most common alternative diagnosis are cellulites, calf strain, and postoperative swelling
Ø Although the clinical diagnosis rule is a valid and reliable tool, all patients who are suspected of having
PDVT should have their physician contacted by the physical therapist and undergo formal diagnostic
testing even if the risk of PDVT is low.
References
Riddle DL, Wells PS. Diagnosis of lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis in outpatients. Physi
Ther. 84: 729-735, 2004.
Riddle DL, Hillner BE, Wells PS, et al. Diagnosis of lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis in
outpatients with musculoskeltal disorders: a national survey study of physical therapist. Phys Ther. 84; 7171-728.
STRENGTH / CONDITIONING CLINICAL PRACTICE
Chris Kolba, PT, PhD, MHS, CSCS
DISCLAIMER
Strength progression in rehabilitation is time and criterion based, dependent on tissue healing
timeframes, patient demographics and clinician evaluation.
BACKGROUND:
The outpatient and sports medicine clinician is responsible for returning their patients to the functional
activities they are unable to complete. If the clinician is unfamiliar with strength and power
progression they may be limited in optimizing the patient’s full recovery. This has been identified in a
few long term studies that reported even after 1-2 years people still lacked strength and power after
their injury /surgery and did not return to their activity at the previous level. (7) While many factors
may be identified, we should ask ourselves if we have progressed the patients strength and power to
its optimal level. This provides the patient with the confidence and reduces the risk of re-injury
associated with successful return to sports participation. (1)
This document will serve to provide rehab professionals with a frame work to progress strength
beyond the subacute phase. It will also serve to fill a gap in our education and clinical practice that
will significantly impact patients and their goal of returning to optimal function whether it be for life,
work or recreation.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Precautions /Contraindications
Unhealed /inflamed tissue- healing tissue should not be overstressed.
Contra-indicated movements per post-surgical guidelines. Ex: bench pressing after anterior shoulder
stabilization
Diabetes, heart disease, osteoporosis – not contraindicated if stable
Fever / flu like symptoms – not appropriate to lift /exercise
Postural and technique considerations should be addressed
Heavy weights in skeletally immature individuals
Plyometric exercises need to be progressed appropriately and not used for conditioning and
endurance.
See Appendix B
Hypertrophy – working to increase the size of a muscle to prepare for the next phase
Intensity Reps Sets Frequency Rest between
sets
50-75% of 1 6-12 3-5 2-3x/wk. 30sec –
Rep max (RM) 1.5min
Linear Model Periodization (Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. 3rd Edition. 2008)
Utilized when there is adequate time frame of training to complete the phases.
Multiple weeks spent on each phase – Traditionally 4-6 weeks starting in the hypertrophy phase and
progressing into strength and then power. This will assist in optimizing the patient’s progression to
more appropriately prepare them for return to sport and reduce their risk of re-injury.
Phase Intensity Reps Sets Frequency Duration
Hypertrophy 50-75% 10-25 3-5 2-3x/wk. 4-6wks
1RM
Clinical Pearl: Super set Bench with cable row and shoulder press with cable pull down. (Push-Pull
super set)
Clinical Pearl: Superset each of above exercises with another balance or opposite muscle group to
get more work done in same amount of time.
Ex. Barbell Squat paired with feet on physio ball bridge or balance exercise.
Utilized for athlete training /competing year round or multi-sport athlete when 4-6 week time frames
are not available to follow linear model.
May be more appropriate for later phases of rehab. For example, in a later phase ACL patient
attending PT 2x/wk. you might work 1 day using 8 reps for your main exercises and for the second
visit of the week work in the 4 repetition range with your exercises. Alternatively, you could work in
the 6 or 8 rep range both days and change the exercises you are doing each day.
Example 1
Monday Strength 4-6 reps 3-5 sets
Example 2
Monday Hypertrophy 6-15 reps 3-5 sets
Phase 1
Focus on mechanics w/ decreased eccentric forces / Quiet landings
(2x/week 5 sets 5 -10 foot contacts = 50 to 100 contacts / week)
Jump up onto box - SL hop up onto box 5x5-10 4-8in box
Lateral hop up onto box / Alternating side to side hop w/ hold (Skater hops) 5x5-10
Phase 2
Continue focus on form & technique. Increase eccentric forces by removing box
(2x/week 5 sets 5-10 foot contacts /session)
Vertical Jump and stick landing
Lateral jump over hurdle and stick landing
Phase 3
Add elastic response (2x/week 5 sets 5-10 foot contacts /session)
Jump over hurdle to vertical jump & stick landing
Phase 4
Plyometrics. Repetitive Jumps (2x/week 5 sets 5-10 foot contacts /session)
Multiple jumps over hurdles – anterior and laterally. Progress to hops
SQUAT
DEADLIFT
BENCH PRESS
Periodization
Cycling of volume, intensity and duration to achieve desired goals, reduce injury and plateaus.
Volume
Total amount of weight lifted in a training session. Calculated: sets x reps x load
Intensity /Load
The amount of weight lifted
Duration /Frequency
How many reps or how often
Set
A group of repetitions sequentially performed before stopping to rest
Rep
The number of times a weight is lifted within a set.
Super Set
2 or more exercises working different muscle groups are performed in a row without rest between
them.
Strength
Force x distance
Power
Work divided by time
Jump
Double leg take off followed by double leg landing
Hop
Single leg take off, landing on same foot
Bound
Single leg take off, landing on opposite foot
Skip
Single leg take off with two foot contacts
Texts /Books
Baechle, TR., Earle, RW. NSCA Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning 3 rd edition. 2008.
Boyle, M. New Functional Training for Sport 2nd edition. 2016.
Santana, JC. The Essence of Program Design. 2004
Starrett, K., Cordoza, G. Becoming a Supple Leopard. 2 nd edition. 2015.
Bompa, T., Buzzichelli, C. Periodization Training for Sports. 3 rd Edition. 2015.
Articles
1. Arden, CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, et al. Return to sports following anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. 2011; Vol. 7: 596-
606.
2. Cormie, P., McGuigan, M.R., Newton, R.U., et al. Developing neuromuscular power: part 2 -
training considerations for improving maximal power production. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)
Feb 2011, 41(2):125-146.
3. R. Csapo, L. M. Alegre. Effects of resistance training with moderate vs heavy loads on muscle
mass and strength in the elderly: A meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016; 26: 995–1006.
4. Davies TB , Kuang K, Orr R, Halaki M, Hackett D. Effect of Movement Velocity During
Resistance Training on Dynamic Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports
Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). Aug 2017;47(8):1603-1617.
5. Gonzalez, A.M. Acute Anabolic Response and Muscular Adaption After Hypertrophy-Style and
Strength-Style Resistance Exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 20016; Volume
30, Number 10.
6. Grgic, J., Schoenfeld, B.J., Davies, T.B. et al. Effect of Resistance Training Frequency on Gains in
Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine. May 2018; Volume
48, Issue 5, pp 1207–1220.
7. Larsen, JB, Farup, J., Lind, M., et al. Muscle strength and functional performance is markedly
impaired at the recommended time point for sport return after anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction in recreational athletes. Hum Mov Sci. 2015; 39:73-87.
8. Ralston, GW., Kilgore, L., Wyatt, FB., Baker, JS. The Effect of Weekly Set Volume on Strength
Gain: A Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2017; 47:2585–2601.
9. Ratamess, NA., Alvar, BA., Evetoch, Tk. ACSM. Progression Models in Resistance Training for
Healthy Adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; Vol. 41 (3), pp. 687-708
10. Rathleff, MS, Mølgaard, CM, Fredberg, U., et al. High‐load strength training improves outcome in
patients with plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial with 12‐month follow‐up. Scandinavian
Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2015; Volume 25, Issue 3.
11. Silva, N.L., Oliveira, R.B., Fleck, S.J., et al. Influence of strength training variables on strength
gains in adults over 55 years-old: A meta-analysis of dose–response relationships. Journal of Science
and Medicine in Sport. 2014; ( 17) 337–344.
12. Schoenfeld, BJ. Is There a Minimum Intensity Threshold for Resistance Training-Induced
Hypertrophic Adaptations? Sports Med. 2013; 43:1279–1288.
13. Schoenfeld, BJ., Grgic, J., Ogborn, D., et al. Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations Between
Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of
Strength and Conditioning Research. 2017; 31(12):3508-3523.
Strength /Cond. Clinical Practice Guideline Author: Chris Kolba PT PhD MHS CCSCS. 2018
J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(9).
• The recommended patient reported outcome measure is the TMD Disability Index
• The TMD Disability Index (also referred to as the Steigerwald Maher TMD Disability Index) was created in 1997
and involves 10 functionally related questions associated with TMD. The scale is a self-report, disease-specific
instrument with five possible selections for each question, each with increasing severity. (6)
• A study in 2015 at European School of Osteopathy, University of Greenwich suggests that the TMD Disability
Index offers sufficient external validity and could be integrated into practice life as a quick, accessible, and easy
tool to monitor patients’ progress and assess levels of inflammation, without the need for repetitive imaging. (6)
Dietary considerations
• Dietary considerations include soft foods to minimize over stretching of the mastication muscles such as beans,
steamed vegetables or fruits, cheese or cottage cheese, fish, fruit smoothies, oatmeal or other soft, hot breakfast
cereals, mashed potatoes, scrambled eggs, soup, or yogurt (3)
• Refrain from eating any foods that require one to open too wide, sticky or chewy items such as caramel apples or
candy bars, hard or crunchy foods, apples, pretzels, or raw carrots, crunchy cereals, or tough steak
• One can progress to foods that initially were painful or difficult to consume
• Once symptoms have decreased to a manageable level, harder foods can be periodically tested for provocation
and reintroduced when appropriate (3)
• Consider implementation of joint mobilization (grade I or II) for pain including distraction, anterior glide, anterior
glide with pre-positioned mouth opening (5)
• medial/lateral glides, caudal-anterior-medial (CAM) glide and CAM with pre-positioned mouth opening (5)
• Joint mobilization should be applied when a movement restriction is evident but should be avoided if joint
hypermobility is suspected or verified unless a low-grade technique is utilized (5)
• Joint mobilization dosage should be guided by an informed decision that takes into account the patient’s irritability
level and can include cervical manual techniques
• Consider implementation of intraoral and extraoral soft tissue mobilization
• At a minimum, the temporalis, masseter, medial pterygoid, and lateral pterygoid muscles must be considered (8)
• Accessory muscles of mastication and cervical spine musculature may also require management through soft
tissue mobilization (8)
• Utilizing one digit or one reinforced digit to contact a myofascial trigger point or the general muscle belly can be
helpful
• Friction massage can be applied in a variety of directions and are easily applied to the masseter and temporalis
muscle bellies
• Intra-oral techniques directed at the medial and lateral pterygoid muscles are useful as well (consideration of
patient gag reflex is recommended) (9)
• Perhaps the most widely known exercise routine for TMD is the Rocabado 6 x 6 program which utilizes six
exercises six time per day (see table 1)
• The program has only been studied once for effectiveness and suggests the program adds no extra benefit to the
rehabilitation process
• Kraus’ temporomandibular joint exercises include those to inhibit excessive masticatory muscle activity, target
both neuro-muscular control of mandibular movement, and address joint clicking, muscle asymmetry, deviations
in active ROM patterns, and spasms that limit opening via isometrics (see table 2)
Patient education
• Patient education is a central component of TMD management and should include reducing parafunctional habits,
addressing psychosocial factors, and providing pain science education
• Functional habits are generally limited to caloric intake, breathing, and yawning
• Parafunctional habits can include bruxism and lip biting
• The clinician should educate the patient with regard to food consistency, laterality of chewing (ie chewing on both
sides if able to promote symmetry or unilaterally initially if chewing is too uncomfortable), symptom behavior, and
pain variables
• Harder, drier foods require an increased number of chewing cycles and longer times in the mouth before
swallowing
• Those with hypermobility may require education to avoid end range positions such as with yawning
• To avoid overstretching and irritating joint structures with yawning, the patient should be taught not to depress
their mandible farther than the position that permits the tip of the tongue to maintain contact with the hard palate
just posterior to the upper incisors
• Refrain from weight bearing through the joint (ie: resting the hand on the mandible if sitting at a desk)
Modalities
• A series of studies demonstrated that over a minimum of five 30-minute sessions, multimodal management of
TMD including soft tissue mobilization, muscle stretching, gentle isometric tension exercises against resistance,
guided opening and closing, manual joint distraction, disc/condyle mobilization, postural corrections, and
relaxation techniques are helpful in reducing symptoms associated with TMD (4)
• The clinician should take care to address any cervical spine range deficits, accessory movement restrictions, and
altered muscle recruitment patterns
Reviewers:
References:
1.) Wilk B, Stenback J, McCain J. Post arthroscopy Physical Therapy Management with Temporomandibular Joint
Dysfunction. JOSPT, Vol 18 September 1993
2.) Placzek J, Boyce B. Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Secrets 2nd ed. pp 496. Elsevier Inc, 2006.
3.) Shaffer S, Brismee J, Sizer P, Courtney C. Temporomandibular disorders. Part 1: Anatomy and
Examination/Diagnosis. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 2014 Vol 22.
4.) Shaffer S, Brismee J, Sizer P, Courtney C. Temporomandibular disorders. Part 2: Conservative Management- A
Systematic Review. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 2014 Vol 22.
5.) Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Home Physical Therapy in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders: A
Randomized Control Trial. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 2013.
6.) Johnston K, Bird L, Bright, P. Temporomandibular Joint Effusion and its Relationship with Perceived Disability
Assessed Using musculoskeletal Ultrasound and a Patient-reported Disability Index. Ultrasound 2015 May; 2
7.) Harrison A, Thorp J, Ritzline P. A Proposed Diagnostic Classification of Patients with Temporomandibular
Disorders: Implications for Physical Therapists. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy March 2014
Vol 44
8.) Cook C. Orthopedic Manual Therapy: An Evidence-Based Approach. 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. pp 151-176.
9.) Cleland J. Orthopedic Clinical Examination: An Evidence-Based Approach for Physical Therapist. 2005 Icon
Learning Systems pp 141-199.
10.) Vander Windt, DA, vander Heijen GJ, Vanden Berg SG, Bouter LM. Ultrasound therapy for musculoskeletal
disorders: A Systematic Review. Pain. 1999; 81: 257-71.
Figure 1 Distraction of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ); large arrow: distraction force placed through the
ipsilateral lower molars and premolars with the first digit while the second and third digits provide a counterforce
on the inferior aspect of the ipsilateral and contralateral mandibular bodies, respectively; medium arrow:
posteriorly directed stabilization force applied through the ipsilateral aspect of the patient’s forehead; small
arrow: the examiner palpates the joint line to assess for movement of the mandibular condyle.
Figure 2 Anterior glide of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ); large arrow: anterior glide force with mild
caudal bias placed through the mandible via gripping the ipsilateral lower molars and premolars with the
first digit while the second and third digits provide a counterforce on the inferior aspect of the ipsilateral
and contralateral mandibular bodies, respectively; medium arrow: posteriorly directed stabilization
force applied through the ipsilateral aspect of the patient’s forehead; small arrow: the examiner
palpates the joint line to assess for movement of the mandibular condyle.
Figure 4 Caudal-anterior-medial (CAM) glide of the temporo- mandibular joint (TMJ); large arrow: combined
caudal, anterior, and medial glide force placed through the mandibular condyle and/or mandibular ramus;
small arrow: the contralateral hand provides a stabilizing force either through the contralateral zygomatic arch
of the temporal bone and/or the contralateral mandibular condyle, depending on the patient’s experience.
Figure 6 Self-mobilization of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ); large arrow: medial glide force placed through the
mandibular condyle and/or mandibular ramus; small arrow: the contralateral hand provides a stabilizing force either
through the contralateral zygomatic arch of the temporal bone and/or the contralateral mandibular condyle,
depending on the patient’s experience.
Figure 8 Soft tissue mobilization of the temporalis muscle utilizing one digit for contact and one hand for
contralateral stabilization. Palpation of an MTrP or the general muscle belly by the tip of one digit (second digit
shown) to apply soft tissue mobilization to the temporalis muscle. Switching between different digits can be
helpful in prolonging technique application time before the onset of fatigue. Note that a contralateral hand provides
a counterforce to stabilize the head and prevent inadvertent head motion. In this instance, the therapist begins
at the anterior margin of the muscle and moves posteriorly while focusing on areas of the muscle that require
treatment.
Figure 10 Soft tissue mobilization of the medial pterygoid muscle. Palpation of the muscle belly by the tip of the
second digit to apply soft tissue mobilization to the medial pterygoid muscle. For treatment purposes, having the
patient relax so that the mouth is not opened widely can be advantageous. The open mouth position is utilized
here for visualization purposes.
Rest position of the tongue The anterior 1/3 of the tongue is placed at the palate with mild pressure, which
rests the tongue and jaw musculature and promotes diaphragmatic breathing
Control of TMJ rotation The jaw is repeatedly opened and closed with the
anterior 1/3 of the tongue on the palate, which
decreases initiating jaw movements (e.g. protrusive
movement in opening, talking, or chewing)
Rhythmic stabilization technique Gentle isometrics in the resting position are performed for jaw opening, closing,
and lateral deviation to promote muscular relaxation via reciprocal inhibition,
which promotes an improved resting position of the jaw through proprioceptive
input
Axial extension of the neck Combined upper cervical flexion with lower cervical extension, allowing reduction
of tension in the cervical musculature
Shoulder posture Shoulder girdle retraction and depression to
facilitate postural corrections
Stabilized head flexion Upper cervical spine distraction via chin tuck (without
additional cervical flexion), during which it is
recommended that the fingers be laced behind the neck
to stabilize C2-7 while the head nods
Tongue position at rest The patient is instructed to maintain a resting tongue position except during
function, which involves the tip of the tongue sitting on the palate with the tip
resting just posterior to the upper incisors
Teeth apart The patient is educated that maintaining the teeth apart
can be therapeutic, which facilitates the resting tongue
position
Nasal-diaphragmatic breathing The patient is instructed in nasal breathing to facilitate function of the diaphragm,
which reinforces positioning of both the tongue and teeth
Tongue up and wiggle Patients who brace but whose teeth do not touch or grind while doing so are
instructed to routinely assume the resting position and gently oscillate the mandible
side-to-side to interrupt the bracing contractions. If clicking or popping occurs,
intensity is decreased
Strengthening Resisted closing via self-manual resistance of lower
incisors: 5–10-second contractions, 10 repetitions,
3–56/day
Background
Tendinopathy is a common clinical condition characterized by painful mechanical loading of an involved tendon
associated with significant limitations in daily or sport activities. Etiology is multifactorial and typically includes
extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Tendinopathy has been described as a continuum of tissue pathology which can
1
include reactive or reactive-on-degenerative phases. A key determinant in rehab progression of tendinopathy is
whether or not a tendon reacts, or develops an increase in pain that does not return to baseline pain levels within
2
24 hours.
Progressive mechanical loading has been found to be an effective management strategy. Different modes of
strength training, including isometric, isotonic, isolated eccentric, and isokinetic, can be used to control pain,
improve motor control, and enhance function in pathological tissue. Although traditional rehabilitation approaches
have focused on isolated eccentric tissue loading, recent literature suggests that isolated eccentric exercise may
not be a superior choice to the other types of loading, particularly heavy-slow resistance (HSR) loading
3
(resistance performed up to an individual’s 6RM). In fact, eccentric-based exercise may contribute to worse
4
outcomes for an in-season athlete. Heavy-slow resistance loading is designed to target both concentric and
eccentric strength deficits, which both commonly present in cases of tendinopathy. HSR loading also has been
3
found to promote better collagen turnover than isolated eccentric loading. The selection and timing of the type of
load applied to the involved tendon may be critical to restoring function. For instance, isometrics have been found
4
to reduce pain while reducing cortical inhibition of muscles.
Tendinopathy can have profound negative effects on an individual’s function and ability to participate in and return
to their previous level of activity. Emerging research is indicating the presence of changes in central pain
5
processing, such as central sensitization, in some cases of tendinopathy. In such cases it would be beneficial to
6
consider the inclusion of cognitive-behavioral therapy and graded exposure. Generally, clinical management of
tendinopathy should include aspects of pain management and education, progressive mechanical loading,
treatment of kinetic chain deficits, and a graded return to activity. Adjunct treatments, such as joint mobilizations
and friction massage, can be used in combination with a progressive resistance program, especially if joint or
muscle dysfunction is contributing to altered movement patterns and abnormal tendon loading.
Definitions
• Strong level evidence: supported by systematic review, meta-analysis, or >5 RCT
• Moderate level evidence: supported by 3-4 RCT
• Low level evidence: supported in 1-2 RCT or clinical case series
• Expert opinion: supported by case studies, expert opinions or opinions of the authors
Summary of Recommendations
Risk Factors • General overuse
• Repetitive tensile loading
• Combination of tensile, shear, and compressive forces
Differential • Partial to full tendon ruptures
Diagnosis • Muscle strain
• Stress reaction/fracture
• Nerve entrapment
Examination • Outcome Measure: VISA (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment, body-part specific
measure
• Impairments and functional limitations
• Isolated muscle/kinetic chain deficits
Classification • Reactive
• Reactive-on-degenerative
Phases of • Pain Reduction and Load Management (isometric loading and avoiding positions of
Progression compression) – refer to appendix
• Isotonic Loading (Heavy- slow resistance through concentric-eccentric phases)
• Energy-Storage Loading (plyometric loading)
• Return to Activity/Sport
Interventions • Patient education
• Prolonged isometric contractions of moderate intensity (40-70%) with tendon in shortened
range throughout entirety of rehab
• Progressive muscle-tendon loading program
• Correction of kinetic chain deficits
• Joint/soft tissue mobilizations to adjacent areas
• Return to activity/sport progression
Criteria for • Full and symmetrical ROM and strength/power
Discharge • Pain-free high load resistance test to muscle-tendon unit
• Return to sport/activity without reactive pain
• Proper long-term maintenance program implemented for self-management of symptoms
Phase I: Pain Reduction and Load Management
Indications 1. Patient experiences reactive pain (More than 3/10 pain during or after activity/isotonic
loading that lasts greater than 24 hours). Range of acceptable pain levels may vary
dependent on patient tolerance and understanding of therapeutic ranges.
2. Unable to maintain current activity levels due to pain
3. Localized tenderness at tendon
Activity 1. Reduced loading, modified volume of activity, and avoidance of tendon in compressive
Modifications positions including end-range stretching
expert opinion 2. Patient Education: expected recovery progression, cognitive behavioral therapy if
indicated
Prolonged Perform with tendon in shortened/non-compressed position.
Isometric Prescription: 5 repetitions of 45-60 seconds, 2-3 times per day, progressing from 40% to 70%
Contractions maximal voluntary contraction. 1-2 minute rest periods between contractions. Daily.
strong level
evidence
Treatment of Assessing and treating local and regional movement impairments
Kinetic Chain
Impairments
expert opinion
Criteria to 1. Can complete isotonic loading with minimal reactive pain (<3/10 pain or no increase in
Progress to baseline pain lasting longer than 24 hours)
Phase 2 2. Decreased pain with ADLs
expert opinion
Indications 1. Symmetrical strength bilaterally (recommended strength tests: 10 RM, Manual muscle
testing, and/or isokinetic testing)
2. Tolerates introduction of energy storage exercises with minimal pain
Sport or Progressing volume then intensity.
Activity-Specific Prescription: every third day, progressing to a volume required by the sport/activity
Movements
expert opinion
Heavy, Slow Prescription: 3-4 sets of concentric-eccentric exercise starting at 15 repetitions and
Resistance progressing to 6 repetitions, performed every other day.
strong level
evidence Initially, complete exercise in modified ROM to avoid compression of tendon then progress
into full ROM as strength and pain levels allow.
Prolonged Perform with tendon in shortened/non-compressed/mid-range position. This is done as
Isometric needed at this phase for pain management.
Contractions
strong level Prescription: 5 repetitions of 45-60 seconds, 2-3 times per day, progressing from 40% to
evidence 70% maximal voluntary contraction. 1-2 minute rest periods between contractions. Daily.
Criteria to Ability to complete energy storage exercises with minimal pain and at a volume that would
Progress to replicate the demands of the sport/activity
Phase 4
expert opinion
Proximal • Physioball hamstring Gluteal • Physioball glute Quad / Patellar • Quad extension
Hamstring curls Tendinopathy bridges Tendinopathy • Slant board
Tendinopathy • Glute bridges • Monster walks / single leg squats
• Nordic curls band squats • Leg extension
• Askling’s glide • Lumbopelvic stability
• Prone/seated leg training
curls
References
1. Cook JL, Rio E, Purdam CR, et al. Revisiting the continuum model of tendon pathology: what is its merit in clinical
practice and research? Br J Sports Med Published Online First: April 28, 2016. Doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-095422.
2. Malliaras P, Cook J, Purdam C, Rio E. Patellar tendinopathy: clinical diagnosis, load management, and advice for
challenging case presentations. JOSPT. 2015;45:887-897.
3. Malliaras P, Barton CJ, Reeves ND, Langberg H. Achilles and patellar tendinopathy loading programmes: a
systematic review comparing clinical outcomes and identifying potential mechanisms for effectiveness. Sports Med.
2013;43:267-286.
4. Rio E, Kidgell D, Purdam C, et al. Isometric exercise induces analgesia and reduces inhibition in patellar
tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(19):1277-83.
5. Plinsinga ML, Brink MS, Vicenzino B, Van Wilgen CP. Evidence of nervous system sensitization in commonly
presenting and persistent painful tendinopathies: a systematic review. JOSPT. 2015;45:864-875.
6. Rundell SD, Davenport TE. Patient education based on principles of cognitive behavioral therapy for a patient with
persistent low back pain: a case report. JOSPT. 2010;40:494-501.
7. Fredburg U, Bolvig L, Andersen NT. Prophylactic training in asymptomatic soccer players with ultrasonographic
abnormalities in Achilles and patellar tendons: the Danish Super League Study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:451-
460.
8. van Ark M, et al. Do isometric and isotonic exercise programs reduce pain in athletes with patellar tendinopathy in-
season? A randomized clinical trial. J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Dec 7. pii: S1440-2440(15)00231-5. doi:
10.1016/j.jsams.2015.11.006. [Epub ahead of print] PMID:26707957.
9. Goom TSH, Malliaras P, Reiman MP, Purdam CR. Proximal hamstring tendinopathy: clinical aspects of
assessment and management. JOSPT. 2016;46:483-493.
10. Rudavsky A, Cook J. Physiotherapy management of patellar tendinopathy (jumper’s knee). Journal of
Physiotherapy. 2014;60:122-129.
11. Silbernagel KG, Crossley KM. A proposed return-to-sport program for patients with midportion Achilles
tendinopathy: rationale and implementation. JOSPT. 2015;45:876-886.
12. Hart DA, Scott A. Getting the dose right when prescribing exercise for connective tissue conditions: the Yin and the
Yang of tissue homeostasis. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:696-698.
13. Scott A, Docking S, Vicenzino B, et al. Sports and exercise-related tendinopathies: a review of selected topical
issues by participants of the second International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium (ISTS) Vancouver 2012. Br J
Sports Med. 2013;00:1-12.
14. Scott A, Backman LJ. Speed C. Tendinopathy: Update on Pathophysiology. JOSPT. 2015;45:833-841.
15. Couppe C, Svensson RB, Silbernagel KG, Langberg H, Magnusson SP. Eccentric or concentric exercises for the
treatment of tendinopathies? JOSPT. 2015;45:853-863.
16. Michener LA, Kulig K. Not all tendons are created equal: implications for differing treatment approaches. JOSPT.
2015;45:829-832.
17. Vicenzino B. Tendinopathy: evidence-informed physical therapy clinical reasoning. JOSPT. 2015;45:816-818.
18. Morrissey D. Guidelines and pathways for clinical practice in tendinopathy: their role and development. JOSPT.
2015; 45:819-822.
19. Docking SI, Ooi CC, Connell D. Tendinopathy: is imaging telling us the entire story. JOSPT; 2015:842-852.
20. Ryan M, Bisset L, Newsham-West R. Should we care about tendon structure? The disconnect between structure
and symptoms in tendinopathy. JOSPT. 2015;45:823-825.
21. Naugle KM, Fillingim RB, Riley III JL. A meta-analytic review of the hypoalgesic effects of exercise. J Pain.
2012;13:1139-1150.
22. Malliaris P. Managing tendons does not need to be complex: Achilles tendon example. Tendinopathy Rehabilitation.
2016 April (Accessed 10 August 2016). Available at: http://tendinopathyrehab.com/freelesson/?platform=hootsuite.
23. Goom T. Tendinopathy rehab progression – part 1. RunningPhysio. 2013 June (Accessed 10 August 2016).
Available at: http://www.running-physio.com/tendinopathy1/.
24. Littlewood C et al. The central nervous system – an additional consideration in ‘rotator cuff tendinopathy’ and a
potential bias for understanding response to loaded therapeutic exercise. Man Ther. 2013;18:468-472.
25. Dejaco B, Habets B, van Loon C, van Grinsven S, van Cingel R. Eccentric versus conventional exercise therapy in
patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized, single blinded, clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol
Arthrosc. 2016. DOI 10.1007/s00167-016-4223-x
26. Nefeli T, van Dieën JH, Coppieters MW. Central pain processing is altered in people with Achilles tendinopathy. Br
J Sports Med. 2016;50:1004–1007.
27. Allison K, Wrigley TV, Vicenzino B et al. Kinematics and kinetics during walking in individuals with gluteal
tendinopathy. Clinical Biomechanics. 2016;32:56-63.
ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS/FROZEN SHOULDER
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics, and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine Physical Therapy at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Background
Adhesive capsulitis is characterized by a painful, gradual loss of both active and passive glenohumeral motion in
multiple planes resulting from progressive fibrosis and ultimate contracture of the glenohumeral joint capsule.
Primary adhesive capsulitis is reported to affect 2% to 5.3% of the general population. The prevalence of
secondary adhesive capsulitis related to diabetes mellitus and thyroid disease is reported to be between 4.3%
and 38%.
Clinical Course
Stage 1: Painful/Pre-Adhesive Stage (3 months)
• Sharp pain at end ROM, achy pain at rest, sleep disturbance, early loss of ER ROM.
• Diffuse synovial reaction without adhesion or contracture.
Summary of Recommendations
Risk Factors • Age: 40-65 years old
• Autoimmune Disease
• Diabetes Mellitus
• Gender: Female
• Myocardial Infarction
• Prolonged Immobilization
• Thyroid Disease
• Trauma
Exam • Measure pain, postural alignment, shoulder AROM/PROM, strength, functional
elevation, key impairments of body function, translational glide of GH joint
• Outcome Measure
• quickDash, DASH, SPADI, ASES
• Activity Limitation
• Pain during sleep
• Pain & difficulty with grooming & dressing
• Pain & difficulty with reaching activities: to the shoulder level, behind the back, and
overhead
• Impairment
• Decreased active and passive shoulder ROM
• Loss of glenohumeral joint accessory motion
Diagnosis/ Primary Adhesive Capsulitis Secondary Adhesive Capsulitis
Classification idiopathic, not associated with history of related to history of injury, disease or
injury or systemic condition pathology
References
Martin KJ, et al. Shoulder pain and mobility deficits: adhesive capsulitis. Kelley MJ, Shaffer MA, Kuhn JE,
Michener LA, Seitz AL, Uhl TL, Godges JJ, McClure PW. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 May;43(5):A1-31.
Neviaser AS, Hannafin JA. Adhesive Capsulitis: A Review of Current Treatment.Am J Sports Med. 2010
Nov;38(11):2346-56
Background
SLAP (superior labral anterior to posterior) tears can begin as a result of a traumatic injury such as a FOOSH or
an atraumatic, degenerative injury as a result of repeated activity. SLAP tears are common in overhead athletes
and overhead workers. SLAP tears are classified based on the type of tear as well as the portion of the labrum
that is affected. Surgical intervention may include reattachment of the labrum, debridement, or a combination.
Consultation with the surgeon as well as a review of the operative report should be completed prior to initiation of
rehabilitation.
Summary of Recommendations
Risk Factors • Repeated overhead activity
• Falling on out stretched arm
• Contact sports
• Poor shoulder strength
• Poor scapular stability
• Limited trunk mobility
• Faulty mechanics
Corrective • Therapeutic exercise to improve shoulder and scapular strength, endurance, stability, and
Interventions mobility
• Therapeutic activity to improve ADLs
• Neuromuscular reeducation to improve joint stability and proprioception
Strength • Initiate IR/ER at neutral (0º of abduction) with tubing
• Towel roll placed under arm
• Prone exercises WITHOUT weight
• Row
• Horizontal abduction
• Extension to neutral
• Supine punches with light resistance
• Scapular PNF Patterns
• UBE with light resistance
Phase II: Weeks 10-12
PROM and • Full in all planes
AAROM • May progress throwers to beyond 90° ER
Background
Ohio State’s Anterior Shoulder Stabilization Rehabilitation Guideline is to be utilized following open or
arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization procedures. Included surgical interventions include Bankart,
Remplissage and Latarjet. The guideline is based on Bankart repair, but includes specific considerations based
on additional techniques utilized. It is intended to be used in conjunction with the therapist and surgeon’s
collaborative input.
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Summary of Recommendations
Risk Factors • Excessive joint laxity
• Exceeding guideline ROM recommendations/goals
• History of instability
• Comorbidities including, but not limited to, connective tissue disorders
Remplissage Considerations
Remplissage (French for “fill in”) is an arthroscopic procedure that insets the posterior shoulder capsule and
infraspinatus tendon into the Hill-Sachs defect, converting the intra-articular location of the defect to an extra-
articular one
• Most often used in conjunction with Bankart repair
• No active external rotation strengthening for 12 weeks
• No internal rotation or cross body stretching for 12 weeks
• No pushing motions
• No Grade 3 or 4 posterior joint mobilizations for 12 weeks
• Treat like posterior rotator cuff repair
Latarjet Considerations
The Latarjet operation is a surgical procedure used to treat recurrent shoulder dislocations typically caused by
bone loss or a fracture of the glenoid.
• Open procedure: See Subscapularis Precautions
• Review surgical report to determine if subscapularis was taken down or split
• Joint mobilizations above grade 1 begin at Week 6
• No anterior mobilizations
• No cross body stretching until Week 12
Subscapularis Precautions
Repair of the subscpaularis following disruption due to traumatic or forces external rotation and abduction.
• No ER past 30 degrees
• No cross body adduction
• No active IR or IR behind the back
• No supporting of body weight with affected side (ie. pushing self up from a chair)
• Strengthening
• Begin submaximal isometrics (ER, Abduction, Flexion, Extension)
• Scapular stabilization (scapular clocks)
• IR/ER with light theraband at 0 degrees of abduction (within ROM restrictions)
Goals to 1. Appropriate healing of surgical repair by adhering to precautions and immobilization guidelines
Progress to 2. Staged ROM goals achieved but not significantly exceeded
Next Phase 3. Minimal to no pain with ROM
• Strengthening
• Progress PREs in all planes
• Rhythmic stabilization ie. Prone medicine ball eccentric drops, free throws, ball taps, etc
• Progress CKC exercises
Goals to 1. Staged AROM goals achieved with minimal to no pain and without substitution patterns
Progress to 2. Appropriate scapular posture at rest and dynamic scapular control during ROM and
Next Phase strengthening exercises
3. Strengthening activities completed with minimal to no pain
Phase III: Advanced Activity Phase
Weeks 12-20 Goals
• Normalize strength, endurance, neuromuscular control, and power
• Gradual and planned build up of stress to anterior capsulolabral tissues
• Gradual return to full ADLs, work, and recreational activities
Weeks 12 to 16
• ROM
• Terminal ER stretches at 12 weeks
• Self capsular stretches, AROM, and passive stretching as needed
• Strengthening
• Advanced isotonics
• Initiate plyometrics (2-handed drills) i.e. chest pass
• Ball catch/toss at 90 degrees abduction position
• Begin dumbbell pec exercises
Phase IV: Return to Sport/Activity
Weeks 16-20 • ROM
• May begin more aggressive stretching techniques
• Strengthening
• Begin overhead PRE’s
• Begin light toss or volley (refer to return to throwing program)
• Continue with specific training program
• Return to full activity
• Bench Press with bar at 6 months
References
Hayes K, Callanan M, Walton J, Paxinos A, Murrell GA. Shoulder Instability: Management and Rehabilitation:
JOSPT. 2002; 32:1-13.
Lebar RD, Alexander AH: Multidirectional Shoulder instability. Clinical results of inferior capsular shift in an
active-duty population. AM J Sports Med 1992 Mar-April; 20 (2): 193-198.
Wilk KE, Reinold MM, Dugas JR, Andrews JR. Rehabilitation Following Thermal-Assisted Capsular Shrinkage of
the Glenohumeral Joint: Current Concepts. JOSPT. 2002;32: 268-292.
Gaunt BW, Shaffer MS, Sauers EL, Michener LA, McCluskey GM, Thigpen CA. The american society of shoulder
and elbow therapists’ consensus rehabilitaation guideline for arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral repair of the
shoulder. JOSPT. 2010 40(3): 155-168
BICEPS TENODESIS
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Background
Indications for tenodesis include partial tears >25%, tendon subluxation, recalcitrant tendinopathy, chronic tendon
atrophy, and impingement, SLAP, or rotator cuff treatment. The normal attachment of the long head of the biceps
is surgically cut and reattached to the humerus with either a soft tissue or hardware fixation technique.
Rehabilitation following tenodesis will progress more slowly over the first 6 weeks to protect healing biceps tendon.
Consultation with the surgeon as well as a review of the operative report should be completed prior to initiation of
rehabilitation.
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Summary of Recommendations
Risk Factors • Limit shoulder ER to 40° and no extension or horizontal extension for 4 to 6 weeks
• Concomitant surgeries
Precautions • Use sling for 6 weeks
• No excessive biceps loading for 8 weeks
• Initiate soft tissue mobilization at 2 weeks (avoid or cross friction massage for 6 weeks)
• No isolated biceps activation with elbow flexion or straight arm resisted flexion/ supination for 8
weeks
Phase I: Protection to PROM (0-2 weeks)
Decrease Pain • Education: No extremity AROM, incisions clean and dry, ace wrap or lymphatic drainage taught
and for upper extremity swelling control
Inflammation • Initiate passive pendulums as warm-up
• Modalities including vasopneumatic device or E-stim
• No friction massage
• Sleep with sling, place towel under elbow to prevent extension
Post-op Weeks • NO ER>40deg and Limit shoulder extension in frontal and sagittal planes (4weeks)
2-4 • PROM-AAROM for all planes to tolerance [ CLINICALand
COMMENTARY ] at shoulder, wrist, and elbow
within limits
• Scar massage, no
jointcross friction
tendon. Regardless of the surgical
procedure, there will likely be alterations
in shoulder proprioception and function
that will have to be addressed during
rehabilitation.
Post-op Weeks • Initiation of shoulder submaximal-isometrics: IR, ER, ABD, & ADD
FEIJEF;H7J?L;
4-6 • Increase AAROMH;>78?B?J7J?ED
– AROM muscle endurance from supine to standing for waist level function,
[ CLINICAL COMMENTARY
maintaining proper] scapular kinematics (ex. Lawn chair progression). See inset:
El[hl_[m
J
here is minimal research spec-
ifically relating to the rehabilita-
joint tendon. Regardless of the surgical tion of the long head of the biceps.
procedure, there will likely be alterations In the latest Cochrane review33 of physi-
in shoulder proprioception and function cal therapy for shoulder pain there were
that will have to be addressed during no studies specific to long head of biceps
Downloaded from www.jospt.org at on June 18, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
J
here is minimal research spec- justments are made depending on the
ifically relating to the rehabilita- presentation of the individual patient.
tion of the long head of the biceps. Krupp RJ, JOSPT, 2009 It is important to take into account
<?=KH;,$Lawn chair active range-of-motion progression from supine to sitting. The patient is progressed through
increasingly upright positions to gradually increase the effect of gravity on the shoulder.
In the latest Cochrane review33 of physi- pertinent patient history, mechanism
cal therapy for shoulder pain there were of injury, and patient goals when plan- F^Wi[' tion. During this phase, nothing super-
Criterion to
no studies specific to long head of biceps • Pain-free, full shoulder AROM Rehabilitation begins 1 day postopera- sedes the importance of protecting the ning the course of treatment for the
oaded from www.jospt.org at on June 18, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
lesions. Currently, the best evidence for tively. A standard sling is used as needed healing tissue. patient. Decisions to advance through
Progress to
postoperative rehabilitation is surgeon • Pain-free, full AROM elbow flexion and extension
for comfort. An elastic wrap is placed Particular attention is placed on
over the upper arm to provide support rhythmic stabilization and scapular sta-
the phases of rehabilitation are based
on protecting the healing tissue, apply-
and physical therapist experience. Our
Phase III
clinic has developed protocols that are • Pain-free, full AROM forearm and supination
to the healing biceps. A transcutane- bilization exercises during phase 1. Iso-
ous electrical nerve stimulation unit is lated scapular retraction, with the arm
ing controlled loads to the healing tis-
sue, and monitoring patient response to
ight © 2009 Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy®. All rights reserved.
patient. Decisions to advance through tively. A standard sling is used as needed healing is focused on the posterior and inferior foam roll under the patient’s arm during
tissue. supine, the arm at 0° of shoulder flexion,
the phases of rehabilitation are based for comfort. An elastic wrap is placed capsule. Tightness
Particular of these is
attention placed ison supine exercises helps to relieve some of
structures and half of a foam roll supporting the el-
on protecting the healing tissue, apply- over the upper arm to provide support rhythmic linked to impingement. 27,37,48
stabilization and scapular sta- the discomfort. Full passive motion is ex-
Soft tissue bow, then progressed to 90° of forward
ing controlled loads to the healing tis- mobilizations
to the healing biceps. A transcutane- bilization exercises during phase are utilized to 1. Iso- pected 1 to 2 weeks postoperatively, with
decrease elevation.
pain and spasms of the biceps or other patients posttenotomy typically achieving At our clinic, to advance the patient
sue, and monitoring patient response to ous electrical nerve stimulation unit is lated scapular retraction, with the arm
shoulder muscles. As patient range of full motion slightly ahead of those post- from phase 1 to phase 2, patients should
treatment in terms of changes in pain applied in the recovery room and sent immobilized, has been shown to produce
motion increases, manual interven- tenodesis. Manual therapy treatments be able to perform passive range of mo-
and swelling. home with the patient for pain manage- low levels of biceps activity.68 Therefore,
tions are decreased in favor of active and modalities are utilized as needed to tion to 80% or greater of the uninvolved
ment. The goals for phase 1 are to de- scapular retraction exercises are initiated
exercises. decrease pain and improve range of mo- shoulder, 1 minute of rhythmic stabiliza-
CWdkWbJ^[hWfoJh[Wjc[dj crease pain and swelling, initiate gentle early in phase 1 to improve neuromus-
Manual therapy treatments, such as rhythmic stabilization exercises, initiate cular control. This sets the stage for the
Phase III: Strength Phase (6-12 weeks)
Pain-free, • No pain, inflammation or strengthening in plane until ROM in almost full
Progressive • Avoid long lever arm resistance for elbow supination and flexion
Restoration of • Normalize strength, endurance, neuromuscular control starting below chest level, working up to
AROM and overheard functional activities
Strength
Post-op Weeks • Continue PROM to AROM of shoulder and elbow, gaining muscle endurance with high reps, low
6-8 resistance
• Isotonic IR and ER light resistance resisted movement with wrist in neutral (no supination)
• Supine ABC & SA punches with high reps, low resistance
• Week 7 begin prone scapular stability program
Post-op Weeks • Slowly progress resisted biceps curl, supination, & pronation
8-12 • Progress prone Scap 6 to Supine 5
• Resisted IR and ER at 30° ABD progressing to 90°
• Resisted SA punch & bear hugs, standing
• Resisted low row, prone 30°/45°/90° to standing
• Push-up plus: wall, counter, knees on the floor, & floor
• Rhythmic stabilization: ER & IR in scapular plane; flexion, extension, ABD & ADD at various
angles of elevation
• Supine to standing diagonal patterns: D1 & D2
• Begin closed chain stabilization exercises
Exercises 12+ • Initiate plyometric training below shoulder to overhead: begin with both arms and progress to a
single arm
• Low to higher velocity strengthening and plyometric activities: ball drops in prone to D2 reverse
throws
Criterion to • Pain-free, stability & control with higher velocity movements including sports specific patterns
Return to Sport and change of direction movements
Activity, Weeks • Proper kinematic control transfer from the hip & core to the shoulder with dynamic movement
12+
References
Gregory JM, Harwood DP, Gochanour E, Sherman SL, Romeo AA. Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis.
International Journal of Shoulder Surgery. 2012;6(2):45-50. doi:10.4103/0973-6042.96993
Krupp RJ, Kevern MA, Gaines MD, Kotara S, Singleton SB. Long head of the biceps tendon pain: differential
diagnosis and treatment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Feb;39(2):55-70. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2802
Ryu JH, Pedowitz RA. Rehabilitation of biceps tendon disorders in athletes. Clin Sports Med. 2010 Apr;29(2):229-
46, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2009.12.003
Wittstein JR, Queen R, Abbey A, Toth A, Moorman CT 3rd. Isokinetic strength, endurance, and subjective
outcomes after biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a
postoperative study. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):857-65. doi: 10.1177/0363546510387512
Galasso, O., Gasparini, G., De Benedetto, M., Familiari, F., & Castricini, R. (2012). Tenotomy versus Tenodesis in
the treatment of the long head of biceps brachii tendon lesions. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 13, 2005.
doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-205
• If ROM is full and pain free, and patient tolerates PRE’s, may begin free
throwing and ballistic activities as well as unrestricted lifting
Criteria to • Good functional ROM and strength
begin • 65% ER/IR isokinetic strength ratio
throwing
• No less than 15% difference in functional testing compared
bilaterally
• Single arm hop- Patient in single arm push-up position. Hops
with that one UE to small step and then returns to starting
position. This is performed 5 times as quickly as possible.
• Line test- Patient in push-up position with each hand on piece
of tape. Upon start of test, patient removes one hand from
tape, touches the opposite line, and then returns to starting
piece of tape. This is performed with alternating hand touches.
One test is maximal touches in 15 seconds.
• Biodex/ Isokinetic testing for supination-pronation or elbow flexion-
extension within 15% of uninvolved upper extremity
References
Bisson LJ, Gurske de Perio JG, Weber AE, Ehrensberger MT, Buyea C. Is it safe to perform
aggressive rehabilitation after distal biceps tendon repair using the modified 2-incision
approach? The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007; 35(12): 2045-2050.
Mazzocca AD, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of 4 techniques of distal biceps brachii tendon
repair. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007; 35(2): 252-258.
Ramsey ML. Distal Biceps Tendon Injuries: Diagnosis and Management. Journal of the
American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. 1999; 7: 199-207.
Hurov JR. Controlled active mobilization following surgical repair of the avulsed radial
attachment of the biceps brachii muscle: a case report. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports
Physical Therapy. 1996; 23(6): 382-387.
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Summary of Recommendations
Risk Factors • Subsequent surgeries
• Lack of adherence to surgical precautions
• Secondary comorbidities
Precautions
• No aggressive stretching of the triceps
• Splint for first two weeks
• Light soft tissue mobilization, not directly on the scar, to improve blood flow and reduce
edema
• Limit passive shoulder flexion to <90 degrees for 6 weeks
• No isolated triceps contraction with elbow extension or shoulder extension for 6 weeks
• No resisted elbow extension or shoulder extensions/rows for 12 weeks
• No weight bearing through the surgical extremity (pushing open a door, pushing up from a chair)
for 12 weeks
Phase I: Protection to PROM (0-2 weeks)
Pain and • Education: No elbow AROM, incisions clean and dry, hinged brace per physician instructions
Edema • Vaso and E-stim for pain and edema control
Management • No soft tissue mobilization or cross friction massage directly on the scar
• No weight bearing through surgical extremity for 12 weeks
Phase III: Initiation of Elbow AROM and Strength (6-12 weeks)
Introduction to • No pain or reactive edema with initiation of active elbow extension
AROM • Avoid resisted elbow extension and shoulder extensions/rows for 12 weeks
Post-op Weeks • Continue progressing AROM of shoulder, gaining muscle endurance with high reps, low
6-8 resistance
• Initiate active, concentric elbow extension (no resistance)
• NO eccentric triceps activity (use uninvolved extremity to aid in eccentric phase of triceps
activity)
• Isotonic IR and ER light resistance resisted movement (at neutral)
• Supine ABC & SA punches with high reps, low resistance
• Gentle soft tissue mobilization (light scar massage of hypomobile)
References
Blackmore SM, Jander RM, Culp RW. Management of distal biceps and triceps ruptures. Journal of Hand
Therapy. 2006; 19(2): 154-169. Doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.02.001
Demirhan M, Ersen A. Distal triceps ruptures. EFORT Open Rev. 2016;(1):255-259. DOI:10.1302/2058-
5241.1.000038.
Dunn JC, Kusnezov N, Fares A, Rubin S, Orr J, Friedman D, Kilcoyne K. Triceps tendon ruptures: a systematic
review. Hand. 2017;12(5): 431-438. Doi:10.1177?1558944716677338
Giannicola G., Bullitta G., Sacchetti F.M., Scacchi M., Merolla G., Porcellini G. (2016) Triceps Repair. In:
Pederzini L., Eygendaal D., Denti M. (eds) Elbow and Sport. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Keener JD, Sethi PM. Distal Triceps Tendon Injuries. Hand Clin. 2015; (31): 641-650.
Doi:10.1177/155894471667733810.1016/j.hcl.2015.06.010
Kocialkowski C, Carter R, Peach C.Shoulder & Elbow. 2018;10(1): 62-65. Doi:10.1177/1758573217706358
Redler LH, Dines JS. Elbow Trauma in the Athlete. Hand Clin. 2015;31(4): 663-681.
Doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2015.07.002
Background
Ohio State’s Latarjet Anterior Shoulder Stabilization Rehabilitation Guideline is to be utilized following open
anterior shoulder stabilization procedures. During the procedure the anterior coracoid is harvested and attached
to the deficient portion of the anterior glenoid to improve stability. It is intended to be used in conjunction with the
therapist and surgeon’s collaborative input. Therapists should obtain the operative note to ensure an
understanding of the procedure performed.
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Summary of Recommendations
Risk Factors • Excessive joint laxity
• Exceeding guideline ROM recommendations/goals
• History of instability
• Comorbidities including, but not limited to, connective tissue disorders
During surgery the subscapularis will be either split or taken down and repaired. It is imperative that the treating
therapist understands which technique was utilized in surgery. Please consult referring surgeon for operative note.
If the subscapularis was taken down and repair, the following precautions must be taken for 6 weeks:
• No ER past 30 degrees
• No cross body adduction
• No active IR or IR behind the back
• No supporting of body weight with affected side (i.e. pushing self up from a chair)
If the subscapularis was split, the precautions above should be followed except: resisted IR may begin at 4 weeks
• Strengthening
• Begin submaximal isometrics (ER, Abduction, Flexion, Extension to hip only)
• Scapular stabilization (scapular clocks)
• ER with light, non-fatiguing theraband at 30 degrees of abduction (open pack position) - within
ROM restrictions
Goals to 1. Appropriate healing of surgical repair by adhering to precautions and immobilization guidelines
Progress to 2. Staged ROM goals achieved but not significantly exceeded
Next Phase 3. Minimal to no pain with ROM
Phase II: Intermediate Phase
Weeks 7 to 12 Goals
• Achieve staged ROM goals to normalize PROM and AROM – do not significantly exceed
• Minimize shoulder pain
• Begin to increase strength and endurance
• Increase functional activities
Weeks 7 to 9 ROM Goals by week 9
PROM
• May perform joint mobilizations (emphasis on posterior mobility)
• Forward elevation 155 degrees
• IR at 90 degrees of abduction to 60 degrees by week 8-9
• ER at 20 degrees ABD to 60 degrees
• ER at 90 degrees ABD to 75 degrees
AROM
• Elevation to 145 degrees
Strengthening
• Begin light UBE
• PRE’s for scapular stabilizers (rows, shoulder extension, scapular retraction) utilizing low load,
high repetition of 12-15 repetitions
• Dynamic resistance with PNF patterns and manual techniques
• Elbow extension strengthening using light weight/high reps
• Begin CKC exercise with table/wall weight shifts while keeping hands shoulder width or closer
• Strengthening
• Progress PREs in all planes using progressive weight and high repetitions
• Rhythmic stabilization i.e. prone medicine ball eccentric drops, free throws, ball taps, etc.
• Progress CKC exercises while keeping hands shoulder width or closer
Goals to 1. Staged AROM goals achieved with minimal to no pain and without substitution patterns
Progress to 2. Appropriate scapular posture at rest and dynamic scapular control during ROM and
Next Phase strengthening exercises
3. Strengthening activities completed with minimal to no pain
Phase III: Advanced Activity Phase
Weeks 12-20 Goals
• Normalize strength, endurance, neuromuscular control, and power
• Gradual and planned build up of stress to anterior capsulolabral tissues
• Gradual return to full ADLs, work, and recreational activities
Weeks 12 to 16
• ROM
• Terminal ER stretches at 12 weeks
• Self capsular stretches, AROM, and passive stretching as needed
• Strengthening
• Advanced isotonics
• Begin elbow flexion strengthening
• Initiate plyometrics (2-handed drills) i.e. chest pass
• Ball catch/toss at 90 degrees abduction position
• Begin dumbbell pec exercises with reduced motion in horizontal abduction to 45 degrees
• Begin light resitance training except: military press, pull ups, behind head pull-downs, overhead
tricep extensions.
• Elbow should stay at or in front of midline of the body to recude anterior shoulder stress
Phase IV: Return to Sport/Activity
Weeks 16-20 • ROM
• May begin more aggressive stretching techniques
• Strengthening
• Begin overhead PRE’s – never behind midline of body
• Begin light toss or volley (refer to return to throwing program)
• Continue with specific training program
• Return to full activity
• Bench Press with bar at 6 months
References
Hayes K, Callanan M, Walton J, Paxinos A, Murrell GA. Shoulder Instability: Management and Rehabilitation:
JOSPT. 2002; 32:1-13.
Lebar RD, Alexander AH: Multidirectional Shoulder instability. Clinical results of inferior capsular shift in an
active-duty population. AM J Sports Med 1992 Mar-April; 20 (2): 193-198.
Wilk KE, Reinold MM, Dugas JR, Andrews JR. Rehabilitation Following Thermal-Assisted Capsular Shrinkage of
the Glenohumeral Joint: Current Concepts. JOSPT. 2002;32: 268-292.
Gaunt BW, Shaffer MS, Sauers EL, Michener LA, McCluskey GM, Thigpen CA. The american society of shoulder
and elbow therapists’ consensus rehabilitaation guideline for arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral repair of the
shoulder. JOSPT. 2010 40(3): 155-168
Medial Epicondyle ORIF
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Background
Medial epicondyle fractures account for a significant portion of all elbow fractures, both acute and chronic, in the
adolescent population. Indication for a medial epicondyle ORIF is a fracture with a large displacement (typically >5 mm) of
the bone. Rehabilitation following an ORIF will progress more slowly over the first 6 weeks to allow bone healing.
Consultation with the surgeon as well as a review of the operative report should be completed prior to initiation of
rehabilitation.
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on bone and soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Summary of Recommendations
Potential • Nonunion
Complications • Nerve palsy
• Joint stiffness
Corrective • Cryotherapy for pain and inflammation
Interventions • Manual Therapy
Goals • Slow progression of elbow extension and flexion ROM (Do not push aggressively)
• Manage pain and inflammation
• Promote tissue and bone healing
• No soft tissue mobilization or cross friction massage directly on the scar for 6 weeks
• No elbow joint mobilizations for 6 weeks
• No wrist flexion or pronator strengthening for 6 weeks
• No wrist flexor or pronator stretching for 6 weeks
• No valgus stress to elbow for 6 weeks
• Vaso and E-stim for pain and edema control
Interventions • Hinged brace from weeks 2-6
• Gentle PROM of elbow and wrist (Do not push ROM into pain)
Muscular end feel: traditional stretching
Capsular/firm end feel: low load, long duration
• Progress to elbow AROM at 4 weeks
• Ulnar nerve mobility if needed (avoid valgus stress to elbow with nerve glide)
• Shoulder strengthening (wrist weights for S/L ER and prone scap series)
• Light rhythmic stabilizations proximal to elbow
• Continue trunk/core strengthening, LE strengthening, and balance (no holding medicine
balls/weight OR weight bearing with involved arm)
• Shoulder PROM (Do Not Apply Pressure Distal To Elbow For ER/IR; Use Humerus)
• Vaso for pain and swelling control
Goals • Gradual increase to WNL elbow and forearm ROM in all planes
• Pain free with all exercises
• NO swelling
• Initiate light strengthening of wrist and elbow musculature
• Promote proper scapular control and mobility
• Improve overall conditioning and strength
Authors: Greg Hock, PT, DPT; Dan Himmerick, PT, DPT; Matt Schultz, PTA
Reviewers: Mitch Salsbery, PT, DPT, SCS; Adam Ingle, PT, DPT, SCS
Completion date: January 2019
References
Kamath AF, Cody SR, Hosalkar HS. Open reduction of medial epicondyle fractures: operative tips for technical ease. J
Child Orthop. 2009;3(4):331-6.
Huleatt JB, Nissen CW, Milewski MD. Pediatric Sports Medicine Injuries: Common Problems and Solutions. Clin Sports
Med. 2018;37(2):351-362.
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Goals to 1. 75-100% PROM, except ER- keep to no more than 30-40 degrees
Progress to 2. Sleeping through the night
Next Phase
th
Phase III: • Initiate AAROM-progress to AROM as tolerated toward 8 week
Weeks 6-8 • Can push PROM ER beyond 40 degrees
• Grade III sustained joint mobilizations for capsular restriction
• Isometrics-flexion, extension, abduction, ER, horizontal abduction
• Progress scapular strengthening
• Can progress weight bearing to quadruped, tripod (1UE +2LE)
• Avoid active adduction, horizontal adduction, IR
Phase IV: • Gain full ROM through stretching and grade III mobilizations
• Active flexion, abduction, adduction strengthening -avoid IR/flexion/horizontal adduction
Weeks 8-12 • Progress scapular strengthening and progress rotator cuff strengthening avoiding IR
• Begin submax pectoralis strengthening
• Wall pushups progressing to table pushups, uneven surfaces
• Dynamic stabilization, perturbations, weight bearing planks on hands
• Active ER, horizontal abduction- not to end range
Goals to 1. Sufficient score on functional test- isokinetic or one arm hop test- to allow safe return to
Progress to sport
Return to Sport
References
Petilon J, Carr DR, Sekiya JK, Unger DV. Pectoralis major muscle injuries: evaluation and management. Journal of the
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2005; 13:59-68.
Shepsis AA, Grafe MW, Jones HP, Lemos MJ. Rupture of the pectoralis major muscle outcome after repair of acute and
chronic injuries. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2000; 28(1):9-15.
Uhl TL, Carver TJ, Mattacola CG, Mair SD, Nitz AJ. Shoulder musculature activation during upper extremity weight bearing
exercise. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2003; 33:109-117.
Hintermeister RA, Lange GW, Schultheis JM, Bey MJ, Hawkins RJ. Electromyographic activity and applied load during
shoulder rehabilitation exercises using elastic resistance. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1998; 26(2): 210-220.
Fees M, Decker T, Snyder-Mackler L, Axe MJ. Upper extremity weight training modifications for the injured athlete: a clinical
perspective. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1998; 26(5):732-742.
Falsone SA, Gross MT, Guskiewisc KM, Schneider RA. One-arm hop test: reliability and effects of arm dominance. Journal of
Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2002; 32:98-103.
Rehabilitation Precautions
• Strict sling use for 6 weeks after procedure, proper use with shoulder in neutral rotation, not across belly.
• Sling removal for exercises, hygiene, dressing and elbow support activities such as writing or typing.
• Avoid any positions of horizontal adduction or internal rotation so as to not stress posterior capsule and
labrum.
• Neither horizontal adduction nor internal rotation stretches until 10-12 weeks.
• Avoid any weightbearing thru the involved UE for 10-12 weeks.
• Isotonic strengthening at 8 weeks.
• Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics, and
clinician evaluation
Phase II: Weeks 7-10
ROM • Progress FE in supine to 180° as tolerated
• Progress ER at 90° of abduction
• AROM as tolerated without upper trapezius substitution.
• Continue avoidance of horizontal adduction and internal rotation movements or stress
• Avoidance of UE weight bearing exercises or positions
Strength • Neuromuscular re-education for RC and Scapular Stabilizers
o Rhythmic Stabilization in non provocative positions (90° FE, 120° FE and ER)
o Scapular PNF with manual resistance
• Initiate dynamic isometrics with band
• Initiate light band exercises for ER and IR at neutral
• Initiate light band exercises for scapular stabilization (Row, Extension, Depression,
Horizontal Abduction)
• Initiate standing scapular retraction to isolate middle traps
References
Andrews JR, Harrelson G, Wilk KE; Physical Rehabilitation of the Injured Athlete, 3rd Ed. Philadelphia, PA,
Saunders, 2004.
Eckenrode BJ, Logerstedt DS, Sennett BJ. Rehabilitation and Functional Outcomes in Collegiate Wrestelers
Following Posterior Shoulder Stabilization Procedure. JOSPT, July 2009.
Rehabilitation Precautions
• Sling use for 6 weeks
• No internal rotation, cross body adduction, or extension x 12 weeks
• Forward elevation in SCAPTION only
• No stretching into pain
• Caution with end range motion – Do NOT push hard into end ranges
• No supporting of body weight by hand on involved side (for example, pushing up from a chair) x 12 weeks
• No driving for six weeks
• Jogging may begin at 12 weeks
• Long Term:
o No push ups or bench press
o 15lb limit below shoulder height
o 10lb limit above shoulder height
Check with surgeon’s office if posterior instability precautions are indicated on referral or operative report
Phase III: Weeks 4-6
Phase V: Weeks 10-12
References
Bourdreau S, Bourdreau E, Higgins LD, and Wilcox RB. Reahabilitation Following Reverse Total Shoulder
Arthropoplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2007; 37:12 (734-743).
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and
clinician evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Summary of Recommendations
Risk Factors • Low preoperative functional level • Lower education level
• Poorer preoperative active ER • Workman’s comp claims
• Younger age
Precautions • Sling use for 6 weeks Subscapularis Repair (12 weeks)
• No PROM into pain • No ER past 30 degrees
• Start physical therapy at 4-6 weeks • No cross body adduction
• • No active IR or IR behind back
• • No supporting of body weight on
affected side (i.e. pushing up from
chair)
Manual • Week 0-4: continue post-operative home exercises (wrist and hand, pendulums,
Therapy scap squeeze)
• Week 4-6: posterior and caudal GH mobilizations, soft tissue mobilization as
appropriate
• Week >6: PROM, soft tissue and joint mobilization as appropriate
Corrective • Pain and edema control modalities
Interventions • Manual for glenohumeral and scapular mobility and shoulder ROM
• Therapeutic exercise and neuromuscular re-education for UE strength, control and
postural stability
• Therapeutic activity for return to work simulations to increase strength and
endurance
• Sport-specific activity training
Outcome • Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH)
Testing • Quick DASH
Phase 1: Protection
Phase 2
Phase 3
References
Colvin AC, Egorova N, Harrison AK, Moskowitz A, Flatow EL. National trends in rotator cuff repair. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:227-233.
Kim YS, Chung SW, Kim JY, Ok JH, Park I, Oh JH. Is early passive motion exercise necessary
McCann PD, Wooten ME, Kadaba MP, Bigliani LU. A kinematic and elctromyographic study of shoulder
rehabilitation exercises. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1993;288:178-188.
Ellsworth AA, Mullaney M, Tyler TF, McHugh M, Nicholas S. Electromyography of selected shoulder
musculature during un-weighted and weight pendulum exercises. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006;1:73-
79.
Kibler WB, Livingston B, Bruce R. Current concepts in shoulder rehabilitation. In: Stauffer RN, Erlich MG.
Advances in Operative Orthopaedics. Vol 3. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995: 249-297
Park MC, Idjadi JA, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, McGarry MH, Lee TQ. The effects of dynamic external
rotation comparing 2 footprint-restoring rotator cuff repair techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(5): 893-
900.
Slabaugh MA, Nho SJ, Grumet RC, Wilson JB, Seroyer ST, Frank RM, Romeo AA, Provencher MT,
Verma NN. Does the literature confirm superior clinical results in radiographically healed rotator cuffs after
rotator cuff repair? Arthroscopy. 2010 Mar;26(3):393-403. Epub 2010 Jan 15
Jost B, Zumstein M, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C. Long-term outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff
repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88(3):472-9.
Paxton ES, Teefey SA, Dahiya N, Keener JD, Yamaguchi K, Galatz LM. Clinical and radiographic
outcomes of failed repairs of large or massive rotator cuff tears: minimum ten year follow-up. J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 2013 Apr 3;95(7):627-32.
Disclaimer
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Summary of Recommendations
• Do not perform PROM into pain
• Physical Therapy will be initiated between weeks 2-4 based on physician preference
Phase 2
WEEK D/C sling at 6 weeks
6-8
ROM • AAROM per patient tolerance - all motions, adding abduction, IR, horizontal
abduction (maintain subscapularis precautions)
• Ball on wall, UE swiss ball mobility –IR/ER
• Towel wipes on table – any direction
Strengthening • Initiate sub-max/50% effort strengthening
o Isometric flexion, extension, abduction, ER, IR
o Isometric lower trap
o Dynamic isometric walk-outs
• Closed-chain stability – elbow extension with hand on ball performing
oscillations
• Progress scapular neuromuscular strengthening
WEEK ROM § AROM per patient tolerance; avoid scapular substitution
8-10 Strengthening • UBE light resistance
• Begin prone exercise program below shoulder level
• Extension, rows
• Begin closed chain UE activities
• Towel wipes on wall – horizontal, diagonal and vertical
• Serratus punches
• Quadruped weight-shifts
• Proprioception exercise
• Supine ABC’s
• Ball on wall
Goals for 1. Full AROM with no scapular substitution
Progression 2. No reactive inflammation with strengthening
to Next Phase 3. Return to full ADLs pain free
Phase 3
WEEK Strengthening • UBE moderate resistance
10-12 • Light T-band exercises
• Shoulder IR/ER
• Horizontal abduction/adduction
• Diagonal patterns
• Progress prone exercise program
• Row
• Shoulder Extension
• Horizontal Abduction – T exercise position
• Lower Trap – Y exercise position
• Begin rhythmic stabilization exercises supine, starting at balance point position
(90-100 degrees of elevation); progress to side lying, prone, standing
Goals for 1. Full active ROM
Progression 2. No trapezius substitution
to Next Phase 3. No reactive inflammation with strengthening
Authors: Mitch Salsbery, PT, DPT, SCS and Adam Ingle PT, DPT, SCS
Reviewers: Grant Jones, MD and Julie Bishop, MD
Completion date: December 2017
References
Colvin AC, Egorova N, Harrison AK, Moskowitz A, Flatow EL. National trends in rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 2012;94:227-233.
Kim YS, Chung SW, Kim JY, Ok JH, Park I, Oh JH. Is early passive motion exercise necessary
McCann PD, Wooten ME, Kadaba MP, Bigliani LU. A kinematic and elctromyographic study of shoulder
rehabilitation exercises. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1993;288:178-188.
Ellsworth AA, Mullaney M, Tyler TF, McHugh M, Nicholas S. Electromyography of selected shoulder musculature
during un-weighted and weight pendulum exercises. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006;1:73-79.
Kibler WB, Livingston B, Bruce R. Current concepts in shoulder rehabilitation. In: Stauffer RN, Erlich MG.
Advances in Operative Orthopaedics. Vol 3. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995: 249-297
Park MC, Idjadi JA, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, McGarry MH, Lee TQ. The effects of dynamic external rotation
comparing 2 footprint-restoring rotator cuff repair techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(5): 893-900.
THROWING PROGRESSION
Call Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 with any questions
MOUND WORK
MOUND DAY WARM-UP THROWING TO 120’ USING PROPER MECHANICS AND CROW-HOP
#1 20 pitches @ ½ speed
#2 30 pitches @ ½ speed (15, rest 5 min, 15)
#3 45 pitches @ ½ speed (15, rest 5 min, 15, rest 5 min, 15, rest 5 min)
#4 10 pitches @ ½ speed 15 pitches @ ¾ speed 10 pitches @ ½ speed
#5 10 pitches @ ½ speed 30 pitches @ ¾ speed (15, rest 5 min, 15) 10 pitches @ ½ speed
#6 10 pitches @ ½ speed 45 pitches @ ¾ speed (15, rest 5 min, 15, 10 pitches @ ½ speed
rest 5 min, 15, rest 5 min)
#7 10 pitches @ ¾ speed 15 pitches @ full speed 10 pitches @ ¾ speed
#8 10 pitches @ ¾ speed 30 pitches @ full speed (15, rest 5 min, 15) 10 pitches @ ¾ speed
#9 10 pitches @ ¾ speed 45 pitches @ full speed (15, rest 5 min, 15, 10 pitches @ ¾ speed
rest 5 min, 15, rest 5 min)
In order to begin the program, athletes must meet the following requirements:
• Clearance from physician
• Pain free
• Full range of motion of shoulder and elbow
• Completion of strengthening program for upper body, lower body and core
Sample Warm-Up Exercises
***Range of Motion after surgery will likely be similar to range of motion before surgery***
Rehabilitation Precautions
• Sling use for 6 weeks
• No internal rotation (IR) x 12 weeks
o IR behind back should NEVER be pushed
• No cross chest adduction x 12 weeks
• Forward elevation in SCAPTION only
• No stretching into pain
• Avoid arm extension in all positions
• No supporting of body weight by hand on involved side (for example, pushing up from a chair) x 12 weeks
• No driving for six weeks
Check with surgeon’s office if posterior instability precautions are indicated on referral or operative report
Rehabilitation • In supine, a small pillow or towel should be placed behind the elbow to avoid
Precautions shoulder hyperextension/anterior capsule stretch
• In the presence of poor shoulder mechanics avoid repetitive shoulder AROM
exercises/activity against gravity in standing
• No heavy lifting of objects (no heavier than coffee cup)
• No supporting of body weight by hand on involved side
• No sudden jerking motions
ROM • Continue with PROM, active assisted range of motion (AAROM)
• Begin at week 4 - AAROM pulleys in scaption as long patient has greater than
90° of PROM
• Gentle glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joint mobilizations as indicated
• Continue use of cryotherapy for pain and inflammation
• NO SHOULDER IR, ADDUCTION OR CROSS BODY MOVEMENT
Strength • Begin shoulder submaximal pain-free shoulder isometrics in neutral EXCEPT
IR
• Progress distal extremity exercises with light resistance as appropriate
• Initiate glenohumeral and scapulothoracic rhythmic stabilization
Goals to 1. Tolerates PROM/AAROM, isometric program
Progress to 2. Achieves at least 140° PROM flexion
Next Phase 3. Achieves at least 120° PROM abduction
4. Achieves at least 60° PROM ER in plane of scapula
5. Able to actively elevate shoulder against gravity with good mechanics to 100°
Phase V: Weeks 8-10
Precautions • Avoid exercise and functional activities that put stress on the anterior capsule
and surrounding structures (eg, no combined ER and abduction above 80° of
abduction)
• Bench press and push ups are contraindicated long-term
• No aggressive IR behind back
ROM • Maintain nonpainful AROM
• NO SHOULDER IR, ADDUCTION OR CROSS BODY MOVEMENT
__________________________________________________________________________________________
No Pain Pain is as bad as it can be
Function: Circle the number that indicates your ability to do the following activities. (0=Unable to do, 1=Very
difficult to do, 2=Somewhat difficult, 3=Not difficult)
References
Wilcox RB, Arslanian LE, and Millet PJ. Rehabilitation Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Journal of
Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2005; 35:12 (821-836).
Michener LA, McCluer PW, and Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder
Assessment Form, Patient Self-Report Section: Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness. Journal of Shoulder and
Elbow Surgery. 2002; 11: 587-594.
WEEK 1 Wound Care Sterile gauze used at incision site. Check brace for rubbing or irritation.
DAYS 1-7 Compression garment at elbow to be used with physician’s authorization
Posterior Splint At 90 Degrees
ROM Wrist AROM ext/flex
Hamstring flexibility if gracilis tendon graft utilized.
Shoulder Strength Gripping
Shoulder Isometrics EXCEPT Internal Rotation AND External Rotation
Scapular Clocks with manual resistance
Trunk/Core Thoracic Extension
Side lying Thoracic Rotation
Pelvic Tilts – supine, seated, standing, single leg stance as able
Lower Extremity Hamstring Strength – eccentrics
Hip Abduction – side steps, SL abduction, clamshells
Hip Extension – glute sets, bridges, hip extension
Breathing Teach proper breathing patterns- no accessory breathing
Exercises Progress from supine to functional positions
Balance Progressive, safe exercises in kneeling, half kneeling, and single leg
Posture Education on proper posture throughout each session
Modalities Cryotherapy and E-stim for swelling control at elbow and graft site.
Lower Extremity Stationary bike without upper body support
Phase 3 – Advanced Strengthening Phase
Goals
1) Full elbow ROM maintained
2) Progression of UE strength without exacerbation
3) Good muscular control with manual exercises
4) General conditioning progression tolerated
WEEK 9 ROM Normalize elbow ROM- external rotation of humerus to facilitate elbow
extension- do not press at wrist (avoid valgus stress at elbow)
Strength Elbow – initiate eccentric flexion/ extension exercises and continue concentric
strengthening progression
Shoulder – continue concentric strengthening program
Manual resistance D2 PNF pattern with resistance proximal to the elbow.
Impulse – 90/90 position external rotation and horizontal abduction.
Body blade – 90/90 position external rotation/ internal rotation/ and through the
throwing motion.
Rhythmic Stabilization – at 90/90 position and through the D2 PNF pattern.
Core Prone pike stabilization with forearms held in a neutral position.
Strengthening May begin jogging on flat ground (gracilis graft used)
Continue lower extremity strengthening progression
WEEK 13 Plyometrics T-band ER/IR quick contractions.
90/90 wall dribbles
WEEK 14 Functional 15 ft baseball throws into wall for mechanics
Exercise Elbow elevation above the shoulder for over the top throwing mechanics.
Finish throw with ample deceleration ROM from the shoulder back and trunk
WEEK 16 Strength Continue UE strengthening program
Continue core strengthening
Plyometrics Continue progression of UE plyometric activities
Isokinetic Testing IR/ER testing to be performed at 90, 180 and 300 deg./sec.
Phase 4 – Functional Activity Phase
Goals
1) Continuation of strengthening program
2) Full UE ROM maintained
3) Acceptable Isokinetic test results for external/internal rotators
a. Shoulder non-dominant to dominant side strength to be 90%
b. Shoulder external rotators to be 65% of internal rotators.
WEEK 18 Functional Begin throwing progression with monitored mechanics avoiding medial elbow
Activities stress. – Requires physician clearance to initiate
• Maintain elbow elevation above shoulder height.
• Curl hop to be used when initiating throws of 90 ft and greater.
• Deceleration to include good back and trunk flexion ROM
UNSTABLE SHOULDER:
NON-SURGICAL MANAGEMENT
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and
clinician evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Strength • RTC
o ER at 0o abduction: side lying to standing
• Periscapular musculature
o PNF, scapular retraction
Neuromuscular • ER/IR rhythmic isometrics
Stability
Goals to 1. Reduce pain
Progress to 2. Increase ROM
Next Phase
Stability • WB Plyometrics
• NWB Plyometrics at 90º abduction
o With perturbations
o Increase speed and change accuracy of tosses
o Increase reps to improve endurance
Goals to 1. Increased dynamic functional strength
Progress to 2. Improved neuromuscular control at multiple angles towards unstable
Next Phase position
3. No signs of instability or biomechanical impingement
References
Andrews, JR, Harrelson G, Wilk, K: Physical Rehabilitation of the Injured Athlete, Saunders, 2004
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Make sure your medical team provides you with the following before or
at your procedure:
• Crutches
• Boot
• Peel away heel lift (Wear this in your boot and shoe at all times; you will gradually decrease use as directed
by your care team.)
• Therapy appointment times
• Follow-up times (approximately 2 weeks and 6 weeks after your procedure)
Post-procedure Care
Day of your • Plan to have a family member or friend drive you home after your procedure.
procedure • Bring your crutches / scooter / boot to your appointment if they were given to you.
• Weight-bearing: No weight bearing on treated leg; use crutches / scooter and boot to get
around.
• Activity & Rehab: Protect ankle by resting and keeping it elevated to reduce swelling.
Days 2-3 • Weight-bearing: No weight bearing; use crutches / scooter and boot to get around.
• Activity & Rehab: Elevate at least 3 times a day to control swelling. Begin gentle ankle
range of motion exercises 3 times per day.
Progression 1 • Transition to partial weight- • Continue ankle range of motion and add ankle
bearing using crutches & boot. isometrics 3 times per day.
If you were given a foot • Manual Therapy: May use soft tissue mobilizations
orthotic, wear it in your boot. around incision, avoiding direct pressure throughout
See ‘bracing’ section below. progressions.
Some discomfort is normal.
The “rule of thumb” is that
discomfort should calm down
by the next morning.
• If you use a scooter, begin
partial weight bearing by
placing untreated leg on
scooter and bearing some
weight on the treated foot in
your boot.
Progression 2 • Under the supervision of your • Continue ankle range of motion 3 times per day.
therapist, discontinue the use Continue isometric strengthening. Begin non-impact
of the boot. Continue partial aerobic exercise with a stationary bike. You can start
weight bearing with the gentle swimming and pool exercise when the wound
crutches in your home and is healed.
community.
Progression 3 • Under the direction of your • Continue ankle range of motion and add gentle
therapist, begin weaning off Achilles tendon stretching. Continue isometric
the crutches. First, walk strengthening. Progress ankle strengthening with
without crutches in your home. resistance bands. Begin balance exercises like
In the community, continue single-leg stance.
partial weight bearing with
crutches. The “rule of thumb” is
that discomfort should calm
down by the next morning.
Progression 4 • Under the direction of your • Progress ankle strengthening by using heavier
therapist, walk normally in your resistance bands.
home and community. Start
with shorter community
distances and increase as
tolerated. Place the peel-away
heel lift in your shoe and
gradually peel away layers as
tolerated.
Progression 5 • Once you are walking normally in your home and
community, use an elliptical machine (begin with no
incline and low resistance) and increase walking pace
for exercise. Begin using a leg press, first for
quadriceps strengthening and then progress to low
resistance calf raises. Advance at the discretion of
your care team.
Progression 6 • Increase the intensity of biking, swimming, elliptical,
fast walking and weight machines. Once you are
working hard at these without pain, progress to higher
impact activities (like jogging, running, sprinting &
jumping) as directed by your care team.
Discomfort
Some pain after your procedure is expected for the first few weeks. Use an ice pack on the painful area for 15
minutes as needed; in the first 2-3 days consider icing 3 times daily. If you are concerned about your pain, please
contact your care team.
Dressing
• Remove dressing after 24-48 hours. Replace with simple bandage.
• Keep ACE wrap or compression sleeve on ankle for 2 days. It should be snug, but not tight. If you see
swelling in your toes, the compression is too tight.
• Sterile strip bandages can be removed when they begin peeling off or after 7 days. Keep bandages and
procedure area clean and dry.
Bathing
Do not soak/submerge the ankle in water for 1 week. Showering is OK.
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Make sure your medical team provides you with the following before or
at your procedure:
• Crutches
• Boot
• Peel away heel lift (Wear this in your boot and shoe at all times. You will gradually decrease the use of the
heel lift as directed by your care team.)
• Therapy appointment times
• Follow-up times (approximately 2 weeks and 6 weeks after your procedure)
Post-procedure Care
Day of your • Plan to have a family member or friend drive you home after your procedure.
procedure • Bring crutches / scooter / boot to your procedure appointment if they were given to you.
• Weight-bearing: No weight bearing on treated leg; use crutches / scooter and boot to get
around.
• Activity & Rehab: Protect ankle by resting and keeping it elevated to reduce swelling.
Days 2-7 • Weight-bearing: No weight bearing; use crutches / scooter and boot to get around.
• Activity & Rehab: Elevate at least 3 times a day to control swelling. Begin gentle ankle
range of motion exercises 3 times per day (plantarflexion, inversion & eversion only). Avoid
stretching your tendon past neutral (no stretching in dorsiflexion).
Week 2 • Weight-bearing: Transition to partial weight-bearing using crutches & boot. If you were
(Days 8-14) given a heel lift, wear it in your boot. See ‘bracing’ section below. Some discomfort is
normal. The “rule of thumb” is that the discomfort should calm down by the next morning.
• If you use a scooter, begin partial weight bearing by placing untreated leg on scooter and
bearing some weight on the treated foot in your boot.
• Activity & Rehab: Continue ankle range of motion described above.
Progression 1 • Under the supervision of your • Continue ankle range of motion and add gentle
therapist, begin weaning the Achilles tendon stretching. Begin isometric ankle
boot. Continue partial weight strengthening.
bearing in your home using
crutches only. Use crutches
and boot for community
distances.
• *Note that dorsiflexion is permitted for gentle stretching, but should be avoided for all
subsequent strength exercises*
• Manual Therapy: May use soft tissue mobilizations around incision, avoiding direct pressure
throughout progressions.
Progression 2 • Under the supervision of your • Continue isometric strengthening. Begin non-impact
therapist, begin walking aerobic exercise with a stationary bike without the
normally in your home. boot. You can start swimming and pool exercise when
Continue partial weight bearing the wound is healed.
using only crutches in the
community.
Progression 3 • Under the direction of your • Progress ankle strengthening using resistance bands.
therapist, walk normally in your Begin balance exercises like single-leg stance.
home and in the community.
Start with shorter community
trips and increase as tolerated.
Place peel-away heel lift in
your shoe and gradually peel
away layers as tolerated.
Progression 4 • Progress ankle strengthening with heavier resistance
bands and continue balance exercises as described
above. Once you are walking normally in your home
and community, begin using an elliptical machine (no
incline and low resistance at first) and increase
walking pace for exercise.
Progression 5 • Gradually increase the intensity of the elliptical
machine and walking as tolerated. Begin using a leg
press, first for quadriceps strengthening and then
progress to low resistance calf strengthening.
Advance at the discretion of your care team.
Progression 6 • Increase the intensity of biking, swimming, walking
and weight machines. Increase the resistance and
incline on the elliptical machine.
Progression 7 • Once you are working hard at the activities above
without pain, progress to higher impact activities (like
jogging, running, sprinting & jumping) as directed by
your care team.
Discomfort
Some pain after your procedure is expected for the first few weeks. Use an ice pack on the painful area for 15
minutes as needed; in the first 2-3 days consider icing 3 times daily. If you are concerned about your pain, please
contact your care team.
Dressing
• Remove dressing after 24-48 hours. Replace with simple bandage.
• Keep ACE wrap or compression sleeve on ankle for 2 days. It should be snug, but not tight. If you see
swelling in your toes, the compression is too tight.
• Sterile strip bandages can be removed when they begin peeling off or after 7 days. Keep bandages and
procedure area clean and dry.
Bathing
Do not soak/submerge the ankle in water for 1 week. Showering is OK.
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Make sure your medical team provides you with the following before or
at your procedure:
• A sling
• Therapy appointment times
• Follow-up visit times
Activity Rehab
Restrictions
Week 2 You may lift Continue range of motion exercises. Perform isometric wrist and elbow
up to 10 lbs strengthening 1-2 times per day.
Week 3 Progress as Continue range of motion exercises. Perform wrist and elbow isotonic
tolerated strengthening with dumbbell wrist extension and flexion (start with 2 lb
dumbbell and progress as tolerated) 1-2 times per day.
Week 4 None Increase intensity of isotonic strengthening under the supervision of your care
team. Begin joint integrated strengthening like chest press, rows and hammer
curls. Be sure to maintain a neutral wrist position with these exercises.
Week 5 None Continue to increase intensity of strengthening exercise and begin sport /
activity specific training under the supervision of your care team.
Week 6 None You may resume high impact sports like golf and tennis under the supervision
of your care team.
Orthotics/Braces
You do not need to sleep in the sling. Do not drive while wearing the sling.
Discomfort
Some pain after your procedure is expected for the first few weeks. Use an ice pack on the painful area for 15
minutes as needed; in the first 2-3 days consider icing 3 times daily. If you are concerned about your pain, please
contact your care team.
Bandage
• If a bandage / dressing was applied, remove dressing after 24-48 hours. Replace with simple bandage.
• Sterile strip bandages can be removed when they begin peeling off or after 7 days. Keep procedure area
clean and dry for 1 week after the procedure until your doctor has seen you for your wound check.
Bathing
Do not soak/submerge the elbow in water for 1 week. Showering is OK, but keep incision site covered for the first
week.
Follow-Up Appointment
You will be scheduled for follow-up appointments approximately 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after your
procedure.
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Make sure your medical team provides you with the following before or
at your procedure:
• Crutches or scooter
• Therapy appointment times
• Follow-up times
Post-procedure Care
• Plan to have a family member or friend drive you home after your procedure.
• Bring your crutches to your procedure if they were given to you.
Weight Bearing Activity and Rehab
Week 3 • You should be walking • Continue hip range of motion. Progress hip abduction
normally in your home strengthening and begin body-weight mini-squats 1-2 times
and in the community. per day.
• Begin using a stationary bike for exercise.
Week 4 • Increase the intensity of strengthening exercises and begin
more complex movements like squats, hip bridges and
bridge walk outs.
• Begin balance exercises like single-leg stance.
• You may begin low impact aerobic exercise (e.g., walking,
elliptical machine) with no incline and low resistance.
• Progress as you can tolerate under the guidance of your care
team.
Week 5 • Progress intensity of strengthening exercises and balance
exercises.
• Increase intensity of low impact aerobic exercise (eg, biking,
swimming, elliptical, walking).
Week 6 • Progress strength exercises as directed by your care team.
• Continue to increase intensity of low impact aerobic exercise,
but no running.
Week 7 • Once you are working hard at the activities above without
pain, progress to higher impact activities (like jogging,
running, sprinting and jumping) as directed by your care
team. For runners, begin using the anti-gravity treadmill.
Discomfort
Some pain after your procedure is expected for the first few weeks. Use an ice pack on the painful area for 15
minutes as needed; in the first 2-3 days consider icing 3 times daily. If you are concerned about your pain, please
contact your care team.
Dressing
• Remove dressing after 24-48 hours. Replace with simple bandage.
• Sterile strip bandages can be removed when they begin peeling off or after 7 days. Keep bandages and
procedure area clean and dry.
Bathing
Do not soak/submerge hip in water for 1 week. Showering is OK, but keep incision dry until you see your doctor
for your wound check.
Follow-up Appointment
You will be scheduled for follow-up appointments approximately 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after your
procedure.
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Make sure your medical team provides you with the following before or
at your procedure:
• Crutches
• Therapy appointment times
• Follow-up times (approximately 2 weeks and 6 weeks after your procedure)
Post-procedure Care
Days 1-3 • Plan to have a family member or friend drive you home after your procedure.
• Bring your crutches to your procedure if they were given to you.
• Weight-bearing: Toe-touch weight bearing with crutches.
• Activity & Rehab: Rest to minimize tendon irritation.
Progression 1 • Transition to partial weight- • Begin gentle range of motion to increase hip flexion.
bearing using crutches. Some Begin isometric strengthening with quad sets and
discomfort is normal. The “rule glute squeezes 3 times per day.
of thumb” is that discomfort • Manual Therapy: May use soft tissue mobilizations
should calm down by the next around incision, avoiding direct pressure throughout
morning. progressions.
Progression 2 • Under the direction of your • Continue increasing hip flexion. Continue quad sets
therapist, begin weaning off the and begin straight leg raises, reverse straight leg
crutches. First, walk without raises and heel slides. Incorporate core stability
crutches in your home. In the exercises like planks.
community, continue partial • You can start swimming & pool exercise when the
weight bearing with crutches. wound is healed.
The “rule of thumb” is that
discomfort should calm down
by the next morning.
Progression 3 • Under the direction of your • Continue hip range of motion and add gentle
therapist, walk normally in your hamstring stretching. Begin active knee flexion and
home and community. hip extension strengthening (first just using the
weight of your leg, then add resistance as tolerated).
Begin balance exercises like single-leg stance.
Progression 4 • Continue hip range of motion and stretching.
Increase the intensity of strengthening exercises and
begin more complex movements like double and
single leg hip bridge and bridge walk outs. You may
begin low impact aerobic exercise (e.g., walking,
elliptical machine) with no incline and low resistance
at first.
Progression 5 • Progress intensity of strengthening exercises. Begin
exercises like split squats and single leg deadlifts.
Perform hip bridges on a physioball. Gradually
increase intensity of low impact aerobic exercise
(e.g., biking, swimming, elliptical, walking).
Progression 6 • Progress strength exercises as directed by your care
team. Continue to increase intensity of low impact
aerobic exercise, but no running.
Progression 7 • Once you are working hard at the activities above
without pain, progress to higher impact activities (like
jogging, running, sprinting & jumping) as directed by
your care team.
Discomfort
Some pain after your procedure is expected for the first few weeks. Use an ice pack on the painful area for 15
minutes as needed; in the first 2-3 days consider icing 3 times daily.
Dressing
• If a dressing was placed by the care team, remove dressing after 24-48 hours. Replace with simple bandage.
• Sterile strip bandages can be removed when they begin peeling off or after 7 days. Keep bandages and
procedure area clean and dry.
Bathing
Do not soak/submerge hip in water for 1 week. Showering is OK.
HIP ARTHROSCOPY
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise
Isometric Bend knee and dig heel into the floor or surface.
Hamstrings Hold for 5 seconds, repeat 20 times, and perform
each exercise 3 times per day.
Cat and Positioned on all fours, lower stomach and roll hips
Camel forward then roll hips backward and arch back up.
Repeat 10 times, 3 times per day.
Passive Hip Lie on your back and have partner support leg with
Circumduction knee straight and hip slightly bent, AVOID ANY
PINCHING, and move leg in circles, both clockwise
and counterclockwise. Perform each direction for 5
minutes, 2 times per day for 20 minutes total.
1 Week After Surgery
• Once approved by your physical therapist, perform stationary bike 10-20 minutes per day (no resistance,
no recumbent bike and no use of foot straps on the pedals). Raise seat height to a comfortable position to
avoid hip pain or discomfort.
• Add the following exercises in addition to the exercises prescribed above.
Single Limb Stand on one foot without arm support and maintain
Balance balance.
Hold for 30 seconds, 3 times per day.
Supine Heel Dig heel into surface, slide foot toward your buttocks
Slides comfortably and then slide leg back to straight
position. Avoid any irritation or pinching at hip.
Repeat 10 times, 3 times per day.
4-6 Weeks After Surgery
ROM • Continue with stationary bike
• Continue with mobility exercise
• Manual Therapy (long axis distraction and A/P mobilizations)
o Grade III multi-angle joint mobilizations with and without movement
o Iliopsoas release
Phase II – Intermediate Phase (Weeks 6-8)
Partial Range Step with involved LE and drop hips down towards
Lunges ground, keeping knee from coming forward over
toes.
Step Downs Start on 4 inch step or box, keeping hips level, drop
bottom down by b
Single Leg Balance on involved LE, hips level and slight bend
Cord in knee, keeping core activated, pull band across
Rotations body maintaining stability through entire motion.
Mini Squats Stand with legs shoulder width apart and balanced
on BOSU on BOSU, drop back into a small squat.
Side Shuffles
with
Resistance
Band
Criteria for • Improve functional strength and endurance without exacerbation of symptoms
Progression • Full pain-free ROM
to Next Phase • Hip flexion strength >60% of uninvolved
• Hip add, abd, ext, IR, ER strength >70% of uninvolved
Squat Progression
Chops and Lifts (Half
Kneeling, Tall
Kneeling, Lunge)
Weeks 12-18
ROM • Continue per tolerance and pre-exercise warm-up
Strengthening • Continued neuromuscular strengthening with emphasis on hip and pelvic stability
• Continue jogging progression
• FWB plyometrics
• Begin multi-directional agility drills and sport specific drills
Criteria for • Ability to perform sport-specific drills at moderate speed without pain
Progression to Next • Hip flexion strength >70% of uninvolved
Phase • Hip abd, add, ext. IR, ER strength >80% of uninvolved
• Complete functional sport test
o 3 cross-over hop test for distance (within 15% of uninvolved limb)
• Demonstrate initial agility drills with proper technique
3-6 Months
Sport-Specific • Sport specific drills
Training • Caircoas, Z-cuts, W-cuts, etc.
• Functional Testing
Criteria for Full • Physician clearance at last check-up
Return to Sport • Hip strength >85% compared to uninvolved
• Passing score on Functional Movement Screen
• Demonstrate significant change with outcome questionnaire
• Ability to perform sport-specific drills at maximum speed without pain
References
Enseki KR, Martin RL, Draovitch R, Kelly BT, Philippon MJ, Schenker ML. The hip joint: arthroscopic procedures
and postoperative rehabilitation. JOSPT. 2006;36:516-525.
Green DM, Noble PC, Bocell JR, Ahuero JS, Poteet BA, Birdsall HH. Effect of early full weigh-bearing after joint
injury on inflammation and cartilage degradation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2201-2209.
Griffin KM, Henry CO, Byrd JW. Rehabilitation after hip arthroscopy. J Sport Rehabil. 2000;9:604-606.
Kelly BT, Williams RJ, Phillipon MJ. Hip arthroscopy: current indications, treatment options, and management
issues. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:1020-1037
Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA. Acetabular labral tears. Phys Ther. 2006:86:110-121.
Peters CL, Erickson JA. Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement with surgical dislocation and debridement
in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1735-1741.
Phillipon MJ, Stubbs AJ, Schenker ML, Maxwell RB, Ganz R, Leunig M. Arthroscopic management of
femoroacetabular impingement: osteoplasty technique and literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1571-
1580.
Stalzer S, Wahoff M, Scanlan M. Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25:337-357.
Rehabilitation Precautions
Weight Bearing • Weight bearing as tolerated
• Discontinue assistive device initial 2-3 weeks as gait mechanics normalize
Range of • Flexion within pain-free range and no anterior impingement
Motion • Anterior Repair:
o Extension and external rotation within pain-free range and no overpressure
• Posterior Repair:
o Flexion, adduction, and internal rotation within pain-free range and limit
overpressure
• Utilize both weight-bearing and non weight bearing mobility techniques
• Chondroplasty procedure follow same parameters
Bracing • No post-operative bracing unless indicated by surgeon
Other • Don’t push through hip flexor pain/inflammation
• No ballistic stretching or forced stretching
Weeks 4-6
ROM • Continue with stationary bike
• Continue with mobility exercise
• Manual Therapy (long axis distraction and A/P mobilizations)
Manual • Iliopsoas release
Therapy • Grade III multi-angle joint mobilizations with and without movement
Strengthening • Double leg mini squats
• Progressive trunk and lumbopelvic strengthening
• Bridging with swiss ball
• Side abdominal bridge
• Functional weightbearing strengthening
• Leg Press/Shuttle progression to single leg strengthening
• TKEs
Criteria for 1. Able to perform single-leg stance
Progression to 2. Normalized gait without assistive device
Next Phase 3. No pain with above exercises
4. Full range of motion
Phase II – Intermediate Phase (Weeks 6-8)
Goals • Protect integrity of repaired tissue
• Restore ROM
• Progressively increase muscle strength and propioceptive retraining
• Emphasis on rotational strength and stability
ROM • Continue with stationary bike
• Stair-climber/upright elliptical for ROM and endurance
Weeks 12-18
ROM • Continue per tolerance and pre-exercise warm-up
Strengthening • Continued neuromuscular strengthening with emphasis on hip and pelvic stability
• Continue jogging progression
• FWB plyometrics
• Begin multi-directional agility drills and sport specific drills
Criteria for • Ability to perform sport-specific drills at moderate speed without pain
Progression to • Hip flexion strength >70% of uninvolved
Next Phase • Hip abd, add, ext. IR, ER strength >80% of uninvolved
• Complete functional sport test
o 3 cross-over hop test for distance (within 15% of uninvolved limb)
• Demonstrate initial agility drills with proper technique
3-6 Months
Sport Specific • Sport specific drills
Training • Caircoas, Z-cuts, W-cuts, Ghiardelli’s, etc.
• Functional Testing
References
Enseki KR, Martin RL, Draovitch R, Kelly BT, Philippon MJ, Schenker ML. The hip joint: arthroscopic procedures
and postoperative rehabilitation. JOSPT. 2006;36:516-525.
Green DM, Noble PC, Bocell JR, Ahuero JS, Poteet BA, Birdsall HH. Effect of early full weigh-bearing after joint
injury on inflammation and cartilage degradation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2201-2209.
Griffin KM, Henry CO, Byrd JW. Rehabilitation after hip arthroscopy. J Sport Rehabil. 2000;9:604-606.
Kelly BT, Williams RJ, Phillipon MJ. Hip arthroscopy: current indications, treatment options, and management
issues. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:1020-1037
Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA. Acetabular labral tears. Phys Ther. 2006:86:110-121.
Peters CL, Erickson JA. Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement with surgical dislocation and debridement
in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1735-1741.
Phillipon MJ, Stubbs AJ, Schenker ML, Maxwell RB, Ganz R, Leunig M. Arthroscopic management of
femoroacetabular impingement: osteoplasty technique and literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1571-
1580.
Stalzer S, Wahoff M, Scanlan M. Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25:337-357.
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Make sure your medical team provides you with the following before or
at your procedure:
• Crutches
• Knee brace, if deemed necessary
• Therapy appointment times
• Follow-up times (approximately 2 weeks and 6 weeks after your procedure)
Post-procedure Care
Days 1-3 • Plan to have a family member or friend drive you home after your procedure.
• Bring your crutches and brace to your procedure if they were given to you.
• Weight-bearing: Toe-touch weight bearing with crutches. If you were given a brace, wear
it to protect the tendon.
• Activity & Rehab: Rest and keep leg elevated to reduce swelling.
Progression 1 • Transition to partial weight-bearing • Begin gentle range of motion to increase knee
using crutches and discontinue flexion. Begin heel slides and isometric
using the brace. Some discomfort strengthening with quad sets 3 times per day.
is normal. The “rule of thumb” is • Manual Therapy: May use soft tissue
that discomfort should calm down mobilizations around incision, avoiding direct
by the next morning. pressure throughout progressions.
Bracing
If your care team gave you a knee brace, wear it for the first 3 days after your procedure.
Discomfort
Some pain after your procedure is expected for the first few weeks. Use an ice pack on the painful area for 15
minutes as needed; in the first 2-3 days consider icing 3 times daily. In some circumstances your care team may
prescribe pain medicine.
Dressing
• Remove dressing after 24-48 hours. Replace with simple bandage.
• Keep compression sleeve on for 2 days. It should be snug, but not tight.
• Sterile strip bandages can be removed when they begin peeling off or after 7 days. Keep bandages and
procedure area clean and dry.
Bathing
Do not soak/submerge knee in water for 1 week. Showering is OK.
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Make sure your medical team provides you with the following before or
at your procedure:
• Crutches
• Walking boot
• Therapy appointment times
• Follow-up times
Post-procedure Care
• Plan to have a family member or friend drive you home after your procedure.
• Bring your crutches / scooter / boot to your procedure appointment.
Day 1 (day of • No weight bearing on treated • Protect your foot by resting and keeping it elevated to
your foot; use crutches/scooter and reduce swelling.
procedure) boot to get around.
Days 2-3 • Begin light partial weight • Elevate at least 3 times a day to control swelling.
bearing, placing your foot on Begin gentle ankle range of motion exercises 3 times
the ground for balance; use per day.
crutches/scooter and boot to
get around.
Orthotics/Braces
You do not need to sleep in boot. Do not drive while you are wearing the boot. If you have an orthosis, wear this
in your boot/shoe as you normally would.
Discomfort
Some pain after your procedure is expected for the first few weeks. Use an ice pack on the painful area for 15
minutes as needed; in the first 2-3 days consider icing 3 times daily. If you are concerned about your pain, please
contact your care team.
Bandage
• If a bandage/dressing was applied, remove dressing after 24-48 hours. Replace with simple bandage.
• Sterile strip bandages can be removed when they begin peeling off or after 7 days. Keep procedure area
clean and dry for 1 week after the procedure until your doctor has seen you for your wound check.
Bathing
Do not soak/submerge the foot in water for 1 week. Showering is OK, but keep incision site covered for the first
week.
Progression is time and criterion-based, dependent on soft tissue healing, patient demographics and clinician
evaluation. Contact Ohio State Sports Medicine at 614-293-2385 if questions arise.
Make sure your medical team provides you with the following before or
at your procedure:
• A sling
• Therapy appointment times
• Follow-up times (approximately 2 weeks and 6 weeks after your procedure)
Post-procedure Care
Day of your • Plan to have a family member or friend drive you home after your procedure.
procedure • If you were given a sling, bring it to your appointment.
• Activity restrictions: No lifting today.
• Rehab: Protect your shoulder by resting it.
Days 2-7 • Activity restrictions: You may lift up to 1 lb. As you are comfortable, you may begin non-
repetitive use of elbow and hand (like using it to groom, dress, eat and drive short
distances). You can stop wearing the sling after 3-5 days as you are comfortable. No
sustained gripping like opening a jar.
• Rehab: Start shoulder range of motion with pendulums and table slides as tolerated 3-5
times per day. Begin strengthening with scapular pinch.
Progression 1 • You may lift up to 5 lbs. • Continue range of motion with pendulum and table
slides. Continue strengthening with scapular pinch.
You may begin isometric strengthening of your
rotator cuff.
• Manual Therapy: May use soft tissue mobilizations
around incision, avoiding direct pressure throughout
progressions.
Progression 2 • Progress as tolerated. • Continue range of motion exercises. Progress to
isotonic scaption, internal and external rotation
strengthening (start with 2 lb. dumbbell and progress
as tolerated)
Progression 3 • None • Increase intensity of isotonic strengthening under the
supervision of your care team. Begin joint integrated
strengthening like chest press and rows.
Progression 4 • Continue to increase intensity of strengthening
exercise and begin sport / activity specific training
under the supervision of your care team.
Progression 5 • You may resume high impact sports like golf and
tennis under the supervision of your care team.
Orthotics/Braces
If you were given a sling, you can wear it for the first 3-5 days for comfort. You should come out of the sling 3-5
times per day for range of motion exercises. You do not need to sleep in the sling. Do not drive while wearing the
sling.
Discomfort
Some pain after your procedure is expected for the first few weeks. Use an ice pack on the painful area for 15
minutes as needed; in the first 2-3 days consider icing 3 times daily.
Dressing
• If a dressing was placed on you, remove it after 24-48 hours. Replace with simple bandage.
• Sterile strip bandages can be removed when they begin peeling off or after 7 days. Keep bandages and
procedure area clean and dry.
Bathing
Do not soak/submerge the shoulder in water for 1 week. Showering is OK.