Master: Storm Water Monitoring Report For The 1995 Reporting Period

INEL-95/0583
October 1995
Idaho
National
Engineering Storm Water
Laboratory -i-j
Monitoring Report for the
1995 Reporting Period Hi t\ I
U ST I
D. R. Braun
T. A. Brock
^frLockheed
Idaho Technologies Company
r
DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED
K MASTER
INEL-95/0583
Storm Water
Monitoring Report for the
1995 Reporting Period
DISCLAIMER
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States
Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their
employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi-
bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or
process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer-
ence herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark,
manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom-
mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views
and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the
United States Government or any agency thereof.
D. R. Braun
T. A. Brock
Published October 1995
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory

Lockheed Idaho Technologies Company
Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415
Prepared for the

Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management
Under DOE Idaho Operations
Contract DE-AC07-94ID13223
ABSTRACT
The Storm Water Monitoring Report for the 1995 Reporting Period includes
sampling results and other relevant information gathered in the past year by LITCO's
Environmental Monitoring and Water Resources Unit. The 1995 reporting period is
October 1, 1994 through September 30, 1995. The storm water monitoring program
tracks information about types and amounts of pollutants present. Data are required
for the Environmental Protection Agency and are transmitted via Discharge Monitoring
Reports. Additional information resulting from the program contributes to Best
Management Practice to control pollution in runoff as well as Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plans.
iii
iv
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT iii
ACRONYMS xi
1. INTRODUCTION , 1
1.1 Sample Analysis • 1
1.2 Discussion 1
2. ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY (ANL) 7
2.1 ANL-MP-2/2 (GRAB) 7
2.2 ANL-MP-1/2 (GRAB) 8
2.3 ANL-MP-2/2 (GRAB) 9
3. CENTRAL FACILITIES AREA (CFA) 11

3.1 CFA-MP-1/2 (GRAB) 11
3.2 CFA-MP-3/2 (GRAB) 12
3.3 CFA-MP-1/2 (GRAB) 13
4. RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPLEX (RWMC) 15

4.1 RWMC-MP-1/2 (GRAB) 15
4.4 RWMC-MP-2/1 (GRAB) '. 20
4.6 RWMC-MP-2/1 (COMPOSITE) 24
4.10 RWMC-MP-2/1 (COMPOSITE) 31
5. TEST AREA NORTH (TAN) TECHNICAL SUPPORT FACILITY (TSF) 35

5.1 TSF-MP-2/2 (GRAB) 35
5.2 TSF-MP-1/2 (GRAB) 36
5.3 TSF-MP-1/2 (GRAB) 37
5.4 TSF-MP-2/2 (GRAB) ' 38
5.5 TSF-MP-1/2 (GRAB) 41
6. POWER BURST FACILITY (PBF) 45

6.1 PBF-MP-1/2 (GRAB) 45
6.2 PBF-MP-3/2 (GRAB) 46
7. IDAHO CHEMICAL PROCESSING PLANT (ICPP) 49

7.1 ICPP-MP-1/1 (GRAB) 49
7.2 ICPP-MP-1/1 (COMPOSITE) 51
v
7.8 ICPP-MP-1/1 (COMPOSITE) 61
8. TEST AREA NORTH (TAN) 65

8.1 CTF-MP-1/2 (GRAB) 65
8.2 SMC-MP-1/2 (GRAB) 66
8.3 SMC-MP-1/2 (COMPOSITE) 67
8.5 SMC-MP-1/2 (GRAB) 69
9. TEST REACTOR AREA 73
FIGURES
Al. The Big Lost River drainage system 5
1. Argonne National Laboratory - West map of sample locations 10
2. Central Facilities Area map of sample locations 14
3. Radioactive Waste Management Complex map of sample locations 33
4. Test AreaNorth map of sample locations 44
5. Power Burst Facility map of sample locations 48
6. Idaho Chemical Processing Plant map of sample locations 63
7. Loss-of-Fluid Test Facility map of sample locations 71
8. Test Reactor Area map of sample locations 74
TABLES
1. Storm water sampling activities for the 1995 reporting period 3
2. Comparison of ANL-MP-2/2-G Data on 02/02/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 7
2R. ANL-MP-2/2-G radiological data from 02/02/95 7
5. Comparison of CFA-MP-1/2-G Data on 01/12/95 to regulatory guidelines 11
5R. CFA-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 01/12/95 11
6. Comparison of CFA-MP-3/2-G Data on 01/12/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 12
7. Comparison of CFA-MP-1/2-G Data on 06/07/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 13
8. Comparison of RWMC-MP-1/2-G Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 15
8R. RWMC-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 01/11/95 16
10V. Volatile organics data for RWMC-MP-2/1-G on 02/03/95 19
vi
13. Comparison of RWMC-MP-2/1-C Data on 03/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 24
13R. RWMC-MP-2/1-C radiological datafrom03/11/95 25
HR. RWMC-MP-3/2-G radiological data from 03/11/95 26
16V. Volatile organics data for RWMC-MP-2/1-G on 05/06/95 30
17. Comparison of RWMC-MP-2/1-C Data on 05/06/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 31
17R. RWMC-MP-2/1-C radiological data from 05/06/95 32
17V. Volatile organics data for RWMC-MP-2/1-C on 05/06/95 32
18. Comparison of TSF-MP-2/2-G Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 35
18R. TSF-MP-2/2-G radiological data from 01/11/95 35
19R. TSF-MP-1/2-G radiological datafrom01/11/95 36
20R. TSF-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 03/11/95 37
21A. Comparison of TSF-MP-2/2-G Data on 03/21/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 39
21RA. TSF-MP-2/2-G radiological datafrom03/21/95 40
21SV. Semivolatile organics data for TSF-MP-2/2-G on 03/21/95 40
22A. Comparison of TSF-MP-1/2-G Data on 03/21/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 42
22RA. TSF-MP-1/2-G radiological datafrom 03/21/95 43
23. Comparison of PBF-MP-1/2-G Data on 02/03/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 45
23R. PBF-MP-1/2-G radiological datafrom02/03/95 45
24. Comparison of PBF-MP-3/2-G Data on 06/07/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 46
24R. PBF-MP-3/2-G radiological datafrom06/07/95 47
25. Comparison of ICPP-MP-1/l-G Data on 10/04/94 to Regulatory Guidelines 49
25R. ICPP-MP-1/l-G radiological datafrom 10/04/94 50
26. Comparison of ICPP-MP-1/l-C Data on 10/04/94 to Regulatory Guidelines 51
26R. ICPP-MP-1/l-C radiological data from 10/04/95 52
27. Comparison of ICPP-MP-2/1-G Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 53
27R. ICPP-MP-2/1-Gradiological datafrom 01/11/95 53
28R. ICPP-MP-2/1-G radiological datafrom 02/03/95 55
29R. ICPP-MP-2/1-Gradiological datafrom 03/11/95 57
30R. ICPP-MP-1/l-Gradiological datafrom 03/11/95 58
31R. ICPP-MP-1/l-G radiological datafrom05/03/95 60
31V. Volatile organics data for ICPP-MP-1/l-G on 05/03/95 60
32. Comparison of ICPP-MP-1/l-C Data on 05/03/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 61
32R. ICPP-MP-1/l-C radiological datafrom05/03/95 61
vii
32V. Volatile organics data for ICPP-MP-1/l-C on 05/03/95 62
33. Comparison of CTF-MP-1/2-G Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 65
33R. CTF-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 01/11/95 65
34. Comparison of SMC-MP-1/2-G Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 66
34R. SMC-MP-1/2-G radiological datafrom01/11/95 66
35. Comparison of SMC-MP-1/2-C Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 61
35R. SMC-MP-1/2-C radiological datafrom01/11/95 61
37. Comparison of SMC-MP-1/2-G Data on 03/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 69
38. Comparison of SMC-MP-1/2-C Data on 03/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines 70
38R. SMC-MP-1/2-C radiological datafrom03/11/95 70
viii
ACRONYMS
ANL Argorme National Laboratory-West
CFA Central Facility Area

cfin cubic feet per minute
cfs cubic feet per second
CTF Containment Test Facility
DCG Derived Concentration Guidelines

DOE U.S. Department of Energy
ICPP Idaho Chemical Processing Plant

INEL Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
1pm Liters per Minute
mrem/yr Millirem per year
NA not applicable
ND nondetect
PBF Power Burst Facility

ppb parts per billion also (ug/L)
ppm parts per million also (mg/L)
RCRA Resource Conservation Recovery Act

RWMC Radioactive Waste Management Complex
SDA Subsurface Disposal Area

SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act
SMC Specific Manufacturing Capabilities
STP Sewage Treatment Plant
SWEPP Stored Waste Examination Pilot Plant
TSF Technical Support Facility
USGS United States Geological Survey
ix
X
1994-1995 STORM WATER MONITORING REPORT
1. INTRODUCTION
This report presents analytical data collected from storm water discharges as a part of the
Environmental Monitoring Storm Water Monitoring Program for 1994-1995 for facilities located on the
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL). This monitoring is required by the MEL Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan for Industrial Activities (DOE/ED-10431) and the General Permit for Storm
Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities (57 FR 41236).
1.1 Sample Analysis
Samples were collected per requirements found in the Environmental Monitoring Program Plan, the
draft Sample and Analysis Plan for the Sampling of Storm Water and referenced Standard Operating
Procedures. Samples were analyzed by Weston, Inc., of Lionville, Pennsylvania and/or AccuLabs
Research, Inc. of Golden Colorado, per the requirements identified in subcontract numbers (C92-170162
and C90-132792 Modification 6). Samples for radiological analyses were analyzed by AccuLabs
Research, Inc. and/or Analytical Technology Incorporated of Fort Collins, Colorado, per the requirements
in subcontract numbers C90-132792 Modifications 6, and C93-170306-057. All analytical work is
performed according to Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 40 Section 136 methods or acceptable
equivalents, as a minimum.
1.2 Discussion
In the following sections, the data for 37 storm water events are discussed on a facility basis. Storm
water events include samples from rainfall discharges, snow melt discharges and water sampled from the
basins of underground injection wells. Table 1 presents a chronological sequence of all samples taken for
the 1994-95 program.
Flow did not occur at the following monitoring points:
• CFA-MP-2/1 INEL Landfill #3 Extension
• TRA-MP-1/2 North Perimeter
• TRA-MP-2/2 Northeast corner.
Storm water discharges to the Big Lost River System occurred at the following monitoring points
(Figure Al):
• RWMC-MP-1/2 Operations Area
1
• RWMC-MP-2/1 Subsurface Disposal Area
• RWMC-MP-3/2 Transuranic Storage Area
• SMC-MP-1/2 West Perimeter
• CTF-MP-1/2 Collection Basin.
A storm water discharge into a deep injection well occurred at PBF-MP-3/2 (SPERT DISP 2), the middle
well at PBF. Other discharges into deep injection wells at PBF may have occurred and been sampled by
the United States Geological Survey (USGS).
The report is presented in chronological sequence by facility. A map of the sample locations will
follow each facility discussion. Tables for radiological and/or volatile data for each facility follow the
inorganic summary tables. They are designated with the same table number followed by an "R" for
radiological or a "V" for volatile. For example, the radiological table for the sample number CFA-MP-1/2
located in Table 2 would be Table 2R. The field logbook pages will be in Appendix A. Appendix B will
list the volatile parameters analyzed for by the laboratories.
There are no storm water discharge limits specified in the General Storm Water Permit with the
exception of the coal pile runoff. Therefore, storm water concentrations are compared to Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) characteristic hazardous waste criteria, Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA) Standards, and the City of Idaho Falls Sewer Code limits. These limits are provided only as a
point of reference. Radiological concentrations are compared to Derived Concentration Guidelines (DCGs)
found in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5400.5, and SDWA standards when available.
Abbreviations within the text will be expressed as follows: liters per minute (1pm), cubic feet per „
minute (cfin), cubic feet per second (cfs), parts per billion (fig/L) or (ppb), parts per million (mg/L) or
(ppm), ND nondetect, and NA not applicable.
2
Table 1. Storm water sampling activities for the 1995 reporting period.
Sample ID # Type Time Date
ICPP-MP-1/1G SW 1330 10/04/94
ICPP-MP-1/1C SW 1330 10/04/94
TSF011195-2/2G SM 1007 01/11/95
CTF011195-1/2G SM 1035 01/11/95
TSF011195-1/2G SM 1105 01/11/95
SMC011195-1/2G SM 1157 01/11/95
SMC-MP-1/2C SM-B 1212 01/11/95
CPP011195-2/1G SM 1307 01/11/95
RWMC-MP-1/2G SM 1345 01/11/95
RWMC-MP-3/2G SM 1409 01/11/95
CFA011295-1/2G SM 1412 01/12/95
CFA011295-3/2G SM 1422 01/12/95
RWMC020295-2/1G SM 1645 02/02/95
RWMC020395-2/1G SM 1536 02/03/95
ICPP020395-1/1G SM 1615 02/03/95
PBF020395-1/2G SM 1735 02/03/95
ANL020295-2/2G SM 1613 02/02/95
SMC031095-1/2C SW-B 1018 03/10/95
RWMC031195-2/1G SW 1111 03/11/95
RWMC031195-2/1C SW 1120 03/11/95
RWMC031195-3/2G SW 1140 03/11/95
RWMC031195-1/2G SW 1150 03/11/95
ICPP-MP-2/1G SW-B 1305 03/11/95
ICPP031195-1/1G SW 1335 03/11/95
TSF031195-1/2G SW 1404 03/11/95
SMC031195-1/2G SW 1425 03/11/95
SMC031195-1/2C SW-B 1435 03/11/95
TSF032195-2/2G SW-DW 1125 03/21/95
TSF032195-1/2G SW-DW 1240 03/21/95
ICPP050395-1/1G SW 1310 05/03/95
ICPP050395-1/1C SW 1330 05/03/95
ANL050295-2/2G SW 1604 05/02/95
ANL050295-1/2G SW 1614 05/02/95
RWMC-MP-2/1G SW N/A 05/06/95
RWMC-MP-2/1C SW N/A 05/06/95
3
Table 1. (continued).
Sample ID # Type Time Date
PBF060795-3/2 G Well SW-DW 1350 06/07/95
CFA060795-1/2 G SW 1420 06/07/95
C = composite sample.
G = grab sample, if a code is not present, a grab sample was taken.
SW = storm water.
SM = snow melt.
B = sample collected from standing water in a collection basin.
Well = sample of storm water flowing into an injection well
DW = sample parameters included drinking water parameters.
4
BIG LOST RIVER SYSTEM
Figure A l . The Big Lost River drainage system.
Birch Creek di'
for hydropowe
irrigation
on DUG electronic clitafor1:24,000 aerie imp* obtained from the USGS.

1. Spreading areaiA-D: Based on the 5,0504contouronnbpoanphlc
^(rftheRaictorTeitirwS«Jon'm«0(>^cor*xjflr*Brw£)
DnwInglnrJaxcrjrJealOIOOOO 014111117-111147.
2. l>«r^1:TheUSCS1îX»KaIerXCeloctror^(l^forPt«y«
rtolWMiifatoirlly extended over the INEL boundary on die west
tide of the ptaye totodtaatothat Irrigation water blaken at
this point
3. Birch Creak Heye: Correspondstothe below the4.784-ft contour
on a 2-ft contour IntervaltopoaraphlcmapofTAN,whlcnwaipl
topographicmap of TAN, whkii was plotted
fromcBaJtricatafremthaiâaririiunvybyAM
4. HydtoloricriieatiiiHfortnefoikiwIngaie^
VVnilarMandMaidOook(ifEC«Jlc«hotoKmciM992:
A. Kettle Butte N.W.
B. Kettle Butte S.W.
C Quaking Aapen Butte
D. Rkharcfi Butte
Ei Terreton
F. Scovllle
C. Big Southern Butte
reh Greek
5. Blreh GreekDiversion:
Diversion: Survey dale from Soremen Engineering, Idaho
Ifjdaho,
Falls, Idaho,Fab.
Feb. 1908,
1908/ Birch Creek Hydroelectric Fat-fifty, Drawing
No.iTDM-13429. Birch Creek Drmslonlndudes the Inlgato return
flow from Reno Ranch.
6. FtowonnormsldeofrCPPtoBlgLjcetRrven Based ondtertaddah
J
fromAeiomphlcswestaftiienflr
hiet weat of the railroad tracks and on' Inepecttoneast
or uie uauu.
Roads and Fed IHtar Based d^ data obtained from*. W.Ttylor
OT
(EGfVG Idaho) and from 1:24,000 scab map obtrined from USGS.
11
^W^fr
(/u2/culvirti: bin)
NELmWU. ANALYSIS LABORATORY g g T
2. ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY (ANL)
2.1 ANL-MP-2/2 (GRAB)
Samples were collected on February 2, 1995 from snow melt at the culvert by the ditch northeast
of building T-12. Flow information was not available. Chemical concentrations did not exceed the
referenced guidelines for any of the parameters (Table 2).
Table 2. Comparison of ANL-MP-2/2-G Data on 02/02/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Parameter Sample Result RCRA Guidelines SDWA Guidelines City Sewer Code
Conductivity (u.S) 121 NA NA NA
pH 6.5 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Sulfuric Acid (mg/L) 4.7 NA NA NA
TOC (mg/L) 23.2 NA NA NA
Total Oil & ND NA NA 250
Grease (mg/L)
Total Petroleum ND NA NA 100
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
TSS (mg/L) 48.0 NA NA NA
Silver (ng/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (|ig/L) ND 5000 50 70
Barium (jxg/L) ND 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (p.g/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (jig/L) ND 5000 100 2770
Copper (}ig/L) ND NA 1300 3380
Mercury (|ig/L) ND 200 2 250
Nickel (iig/L) ND NA 100 3980
Lead (ng/L) 5.8 5000 15 620
Selenium (jxg/L) ND 1000 50 50
Zinc (fxg/L) 42.9 NA 5000 2610
Table 2R. ANL-MP-2/2-G radiological data from 02/02/95.

Parameter Sample result Uncertainty SDWA DCG
Gross Alpha (pCi/mL) ND — 0.015 —
Gross Beta (pCi/mL) 3.57E-03 6.90E-04 0.050 —
K-40 (pCi/mL) 7.36E-02 1.93E-01 — 7.00E+00
7
2.2 ANL-MP-1/2(GRAB)
Samples were collected on May 2, 1995 from storm water runoff where two ditches come together
north of building 757. The rainfall recorded for this event was 0.22 inches. The duration of the event
was 5 hours and 25 minutes. Lead was reported as 25.4 ppb and SDWA standard action level is 15.0 ppb
(Table 3).
Table 3 . Comparison of ANL-MP-1/2-G Data on 05/02/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Conductivity (u.S) 61.0 NA NA NA
pH 7.3 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Sulfuric Acid (mg/L) 7.9 NA NA NA
Grease (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
TSS (mg/L) 121 NA NA NA
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (|ag/L) ND 5000 50 70
Barium (|Ag/L) ND 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (|J.g/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (fig/L) 11.6 5000 100 2770
Copper (u.g/L) ND NA 1300 3380
Mercury (fxg/L) ND 200 2 250
Nickel (fig/L) ND NA 100 3980
Lead (u.g/L) 25.4 5000 15 620
Selenium (ng/L) ND 1000 50 50
Zinc (|J.g/L) 234 NA 5000 2610

K-40 (pCi/mL) 4.94E-02 7.68E-02 — 7.00E+00
8
2.3 ANL-MP-2/2 (GRAB)
Samples were collected on May 2,1995 from storm water runoff at the culvert by the ditch northeast
of building T-12. The rainfall recorded for this event was 0.22 inches. The duration of the event was
5 hours and 25 minutes. Lead was reported to be 20.9 ppb and SDWA standard action level is 15.0 ppb
(Table 4).
Table 4. Comparison of ANL-MP-2/2-G Data on 05/02/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Conductivity (p.S) 63.0 NA NA NA
pH 7.5 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Grease (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (fig/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (fxg/L) ND 5000 50 70
Barium (y.g/L) ND 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (|ag/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (|J.g/L) 12.8 5000 100 2770
Copper (fig/L) ND NA 1300 3380
Mercury (îg/L) ND 200 2 250
Nickel (ng/L) ND NA 100 3980
Lead (îg/L) 20.9 5000 15' 620
Selenium (|J.g/L) ND 1000 50 50
Zinc (|xg/L) 205 NA 5000 2610

K-40 (pCi/mL) 1.32E-01 4.84E-02 — 7.00E+00
9
705000
70*100
70(600
70**00
70(200
703100
703200
701000
702000
702100
702400
701100
701(00
LEGEND
Roads & Buildings
Date Drawn : May 2 5 , 1995
* * Fences
400 800 Feet
Monitoring points (/u2/culverts: an!8x11)
Figure 1. ANL-W p o i n t s for t h e Storm Water M o n i t o r i n g Program.
3. CENTRAL FACILITIES AREA (CFA)
3.1 CFA-MP-1/2 (GRAB)
Samples were collected on January 12, 1995 from the culvert located at the corner of Lansing and
Antenna Farm Road. The samples werefromsnow melt. Samples were collected using a peristaltic pump
as the liquid was released from the culvert. The liquid was pumped directly into the sample containers.
The weather was cloudy and approximately 35°F. The flow was recorded to be 5.63 cfm. Chemical
concentrations did not exceed the reference guidelines for any of the parameters (Table 5).
Table 5. Comparison of CFA-MP-1/2-G Data on 01/12/95 to regulatory guidelines.

Conductivity (uS) 432 NA NA NA
pH 7.5 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Surfactants (mg/L) ND NA 0.5 NA
Total Oil & 18.5 NA NA 250
Grease (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (^g/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (|xg/L) ND 5000 50 70
Barium (|ig/L) ND 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (|J.g/L) ND 1000 5 . 690
Chromium (u,g/L) ND 5000 100 2770
Copper (ng/L) ND NA 1300 3380
Nickel (|ig/L) ND NA 100 3980
Lead (ng/L) 10.9 5000 15 620
Zinc ()ig/L) 63.8 NA 5000 2610
Table 5R. -CFA-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 01/12/95.

Gamma Spec (pCi/mL) ND — 4 (mrem/yr) —
11
Samples were collected on January 12, 1995fromsnow melt at the Central Facilities Disposal Well.
The flow was recorded at 1.25 cfm. Samples were collected as flow entered into the retention basin. A
pump was used to collect samples. The weather was cloudy and the temperature was approximately 35°F.
Chemical concentrations did not exceed the reference guidelines for any of the parameters (Table 6).
Table 6. Comparison of CFA-MP-3/2-G Data on 01/12/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Conductivity (pS) 411 NA NA NA
pH 7.0 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Silver Qig/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (ng/L) ND 5000 50 70
Barium (|ig/L) ND 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (jxg/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (ug/L) ND 5000 100 2770
Copper (u.g/L) ND NA 1300 3380
Mercury (ng/L) ND 200 2 250
Nickel (\ig/L) ND NA 100 3980
Lead (fig/L) 10.6 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 68.7 NA 5000 2610
Table 6R. CFA-MP-3/2-G radiological data from 01/12/95.

Gamma Spec (pCi/mL) ND 4 (mrem/yr)
Gross Alpha (pCi/mL) ND 0.015 —
Gross Beta (pCi/mL) 8.60E-03 2.00E-03 0.050
12
Samples were taken on June 07, 1995 from storm water runoff at the culvert located at the
intersection of Lansing and Antenna Farm Road. The rainfall recorded for this event was 1.83 inches and
the duration of the event was 29 hours and 20 minutes. Samples were collected directly into the sample
containers. A beaker was used to collect the 4-liter volume for radiochemistry. No flow measurements
were taken because the ditch was full but was not flowing. Chemical concentrations did not exceed any
of the referenced guidelines for any of the parameters (Table 7).
Table 7. Comparison of CFA-MP-1/2-G Data on 06/07/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Parameter Sample Result RCRA Guidelines SDWA Guidelines CitySe
Conductivity (|j.S) 113 NA NA NA
pH 7.8 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Surfactants (mg/L) 0.24 NA 0.5 NA
Grease (mg/L)
Total Petroleum 1.2 NA NA 100
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (ng/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (u,g/L) ND 5000 50 70
Barium (ug/L) ND 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (ng/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (ng/L) ND 5000 100 2770
Copper (ng/L) ND NA 1300 3380
Mercury (p.g/L) ND 200 2 250
Lead (\xg/L) 11.9 5000 15 620
Antimony fag/L) ND NA 6 NA
Selenium (|J.g/L) ND 1000 50 50
Thallium (jig/L) ND NA 2 NA.
Vanadium (|ig/L) ND NA NA NA
Table 7R. CFA-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 06/07/95.

Gross Alpha (pCi/mL) ND 0.015
K-40 (pCi/mL) 8.62E-02 4.26E-02 7.00E+00
13
(S550O
(15000
(S1500
(84 000
6BJ500
653000
(50000
(7!500 — CFA DISPOSAL TYEL1
67)000
(71500
(71000 _ LEGEND
Roads k Buildings
(77500 — ^ Fences
™~ ~ Channels Tributary
Big Lost River SYS
(77000 —
(J) Monitoring Points Date Drawn : June 0 9 , 199!
<•> Surface Water Runoff 1000 2000 Feet
Injection Wells
(/u2/culverfs: cfa8x1l)
Figure 2. CFA p o i n t s and w e l l s f o r t h e Storm Water Monitoring Program,
4. RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPLEX (RWMC)
4.1 RWMC-MP-1/2(GRAB)
Samples were taken on January 11, 1995 from snow melt at the inlet or outlet of culvert #16. The
outlet is right before the bridge to the Stored Waste Examination Pilot Plant (SWEPP). Samples were
collected from the culvert as it discharged into the ditch. It was sunny and windy with the temperature
at 45°F. Flow was estimated to be 78 1pm. Chemical concentration for Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) was
693 ppm (mg/L) (Table 8). The SDWA secondary drinking water standard for TDS is 500 ppm. Lead
was reported as 30.1 ppb and SDWA standard lead action level is 15 ppb. Elevated magnesium levels
were identified at all RWMC locations. This was a result of magnesium chloride (MgCl ) salts applied
2
as dust suppressant to roads. This practice was discontinued in 1993. The remaining concentrations were
below guidelines.
Table 8. Comparison of RWMC-MP-1/2-G Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Parameter Sample Result RCRA Guidelines SDWA Guidelines' City Sewer Code
Conductivity (u,S) 627 NA NA NA
pH 7.0 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Chemical Oxygen 42.5 NA NA NA
Demand (mg/L)
Nitrogen, 0.14 NA NA NA
as Ammonia (mg/L)
TDS (mg/L) 693 NA 500 NA
Nitrogen, Total 1.3 NA NA NA
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (ug/L) ND 5000 50 70
Barium (ug/L) 592 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (u,g/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (ug/L) 41.0 5000 100 2770
Copper(ug/L) 55.9 NA 1300 3380
Mercury (ug/L) ND 200 2 250
Magnesium (ug/L) 19700 NA NA NA
Magnesium, 17200 NA NA NA
Soluble (|ig/L)
Nickel (ug/L) 48.6 NA 100 3980
Lead (ug/L) 30.1 5000 15 620
Selenium (ug/L) ND 1000 50 50
Zinc (ug/L) 229 NA 5000 2610
15
Table 8R. RWMC-MP-1/2-Gradiologicaldata from 01/11/95.
Gamma Spec (pCi/mL) ND 4 (mrem/yr) —
4.2 RWMC-MP-3/2 (GRAB)
Samples were collected on January 11, 1995 from snow melt at the inlet or outlet of culvert # 23,
northeast of WMF-635. Flow was estimated to be 42 1pm. The usual sample point was under snow, so
this sample was taken approximately 50 feet upstream. The samples were collected using a bucket and
dipper. The weather was sunny and windy with the temperature around 45°F. Elevated magnesium levels
were identified at all RWMC locations. This was a result of magnesium chloride (MgCl ) salts applied
2
as dust suppressant to roads. This practice was discontinued in 1993. Chemical concentrations did not
exceed the reference guidelines for any parameters (Table 9).

pH 7.5 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Demand (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Cadmium (ug/L) ND 1000 5 690
Copper(ug/L) ND NA 1300 3380
Nickel (ug/L) . ND NA 100 3980
Lead (ug/L) 3.8 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 138 NA 5000 2610
Table 9R. RWMC-MP-3/2-G radiological data from 01/11/95.

17
Samples were collected on February 2, 1995 from snow melt just inside Subsurface Disposal Area
(SDA) upstream from sump, at culvert C-12. The flow information for this report was not available and
field parameters were not taken. Elevated magnesium levels were identified at all RWMC locations. This
was a result of magnesium chloride (MgCl ) salts applied as dust suppressant to roads. This practice was
2
discontinued in 1993. Chemical concentrations did not exceed the referenced guidelines for any
parameters (Table 10).

Cyanide (p.g/L) ND NA 200 1200
Demand (mg/L)
Nitrogen, ND NA NA NA
as Ammonia (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Silver (p.g/L) ND 5000 100 450
Barium (u,g/L) ND 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (u,g/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (pg/L) ND 5000 100 2770
Copper (pg/L) ND NA 1300 3380
Magnesium (pg/L) 8520 NA NA NA
Nickel (pg/L) ND NA 100 3980
Lead (|ig/L) ND 5000 15 620
Selenium (pg/L) ND 1000 50 50
Zinc (pg/L) 98.8 NA 5000 2610
18
Am-241 (pCi/mL) 2.25E-03 3.50E-04 — 3.00E-02
Gamma Spec (pCi/mL) ND ~ 4 (mrem/yr) —
Pu-239/240 (pCi/mL) 9.00E-05 4.00E-05 — —
Strontium-90 (pCi/mL) 1.49E-03 7.70E-05 0.008 1.00E+00
Th-230 (pCi/mL) 1.70E-04 6.00E-05 — 3.00E-01
Th-232 4.00E-05 3.00E-05 — 5.00E-02
U-234 (pCi/mL) 3.30E-04 8.00E-05 — 5.00E-01
U-238 (pCi/mL) 2.40E-04 7.00E-05 ~ 6.00E-01
Table 10V. Volatile organics data for RWMC-MP-2/1-G on 02/03/95.

Parameter Results Units Qualifier Flag SDWA
Toluene 1.00 ug/L 100
J = Indicates an estimated value. This flag is used under the following circumstances: (1) when
estimating a concentration for tentatively identified compounds (TIC) where a 1:1 response is
assumed; or (2) when the mass spectral data indicate the presence of a compound that meets the
identification criteria but the result is less than the specified detection limit but greater then zero.
For example, if the limit of detection is 10 ug/L and a concentration of 3 ug/L is calculated, it is
reported as 3J.
19
Samples were collected on February 3,1995 from snow melt just inside the SDA upstream from the
sump at culvert # C-12. Water was flowing from the west in the ditch into the culvert leading to the
sump. Water was collected at the point where the water enters the culvert to the sump. Flow was not
determined due to the ice and snow covering the ditch and culvert. Volatile organic analyses were
performed and no detects were reported. The weather was sunny and warm with the temperature around
48°F. Elevated magnesium levels were identified at all RWMC locations. This was a result of
magnesium chloride (MgC^) salts applied as dust suppressant to roads. This practice was discontinued
in 1993. Chemical concentrations did not exceed the referenced guidelines for any parameters (Table 11).

pH 7.4 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Cyanide (u.g/L) ND NA 200 1200
Demand (mg/L)
as Ammonia (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Silver (p.g/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (p.g/L) ND 5000 50 70
Barium (p-g/L) ND 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (u.g/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (u,g/L) ND . 5000 100 2770
Mercury (pg/L) 0.29 200 2 250
Magnesium (u.g/L) 11600 NA NA NA
Soluble (pg/L)
Lead (pg/L) ND 5000 15 620
Antimony (pg/L) ND NA 6 NA
Thallium (pg/L) ND NA 2 NA
Vanadium (pg/L) ND NA NA NA
Zinc (pg/L) 27.0 NA 5000 2610
20
Am-241 (pCi/mL) 1.00E-03 1.90E-04 - 3.00E-02
Pu-239/240 (pCi/mL) 7.00E-05 4.00E-05
Th-230 (pCi/mL) 2.20E-04 7.00E-05 - 3.00E-01
U-234 (pCi/mL) 2.30E-04 7.00E-05 - 5.00E-01
U-238 (pCi/mL) 1.80E-04 6.00E-05 - 6.00E-01
21
Samples were collected on March 11,1995 from storm water runoff at the SDA upstream from the
sump located at culvert No. C-12. The rainfall recorded for this event was 0.24 inches. The duration of
the event was 16 hours and 25 minutes. Lead was reported at 31.6 ppb and the SDWA action level is
15 ppb (Table 12). Volatile organic samples were taken; however, no detections were reported. The
volatile organic compound (VOC) grab sample was not taken within 30 minutes of the storm beginning
as the permit requires. Therefore, the sample does not represent the first thirty minutes of discharge. The
duration of the previous period of less than 0.1 inch of rain was 7 hours and 20 minutes. Elevated
magnesium levels were identified at all RWMC locations. This was a result of magnesium chloride
(MgCL,) salts applied as dust suppressant to roads. This practice was discontinued in 1993.

Parameter Sample Result RCRA Guidelines SDWA Guidelines City Se
Conductivity (p.S) 103 NA NA NA
pH 7.6 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Cyanide (|ig/L) ND NA 200 1200
Demand (mg/L)
as Ammonia (mg/L)
. Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Total Oil & ND NA NA • 250
Grease (mg/L)
Silver (\igfL) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic ()J.g/L) 16.4 5000 50 70
Barium (jig/L) 481 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (p.g/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (îg/L) 58.0 5000 100 2770
Copper (u,g/L) 57.2 NA 1300 3380
Mercury (]ig/L) ND 200 2 250
Magnesium (|4g/L) 21100 NA NA NA
Soluble (ng/L)
Nickel (\igfL) 46.7 NA 100 3980
Lead (|xg/L) 31.6 5000 15 620
Antimony (ng/L) ND NA 6 NA
Selenium (fig/L) ND 1000 50 50
22
Thallium (ng/L) ND NA 2 NA
Vanadium (|xg/L) 54.3 NA NA NA
Zinc (\xg/L) 439 NA 5000 2610

Am-241 (pCi/mL) 8.80E-03 1.10E-03 3.00E-02
H-3 (pCi/mL) 8.40E-01 4.50E-01 20 2.00E+03
K-40 (pCi/mL) 6.91E-02 4.36E-02 7.00E+00
Pu-239/240 (pCi/mL) 1.60E-04 6.00E-05
Th-228 (pCi/mL) 2.90E-04 8.00E-05 4.00E-01
Th-230 (pCi/mL) 1.30E-04 6.00E-05 3.00E-01
U-234 (pCi/mL) 3.70E-04 9.00E-05 5.00E-01
U-238 (pCi/mL) 3.50E-04 9.00E-05 6.00E-01
Zn-65 (pCi/mL) 3.83E-03 3.73E-03 9.00E+00
23
4.6 RWMC-MP-2/1 (COMPOSITE)
Samples were collected on March 11,1995 from storm water runoff just inside the SDA, upstream
from the sump at culvert # C-12. Weather was cold, wet and windy. Total flow for the monitoring
period was 94,690 liters. The rainfall for this event was 0.24 inches. The duration of the event was
16 hours and 25 minutes. Volatile organic samples were taken; however, no detections were reported.
The VOC sample was collected as a grab and represents the conditions at the time the sample was taken.
Elevated magnesium levels were identified at all RWMC locations. This was a result of magnesium
chloride (MgCl ) salts applied as dust suppressant to roads. This practice was discontinued in 1993.
2
Chemical concentrations did not exceed for the referenced guidelines (Table 13).
Table 13. Comparison of RWMC-MP-2/1-C Data on 03/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Conductivity (p.S) 97.0 NA NA NA
pH 7.8 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Cyanide (pg/L) ND NA 200 1200
Demand (mg/L)
as Ammonia (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Silver (pg/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (p-g/L) ND 5000 50 70
Barium (pg/L) ND 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (p-g/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (u.g/L) 20.1 5000 100 2770
Magnesium, ND NA NA NA
Soluble (p-g/L)
Nickel (p.g/L) ND NA 100 3980
Lead (pg/L) 9.8 5000 15 620
Zinc (pg/L) 185 NA 5000 2610
24
Table 13R. RWMC-MP-2/1-C radiological data from 03/11/95.
Am-241 (pCi/mL) 2.15E-03 3.30E-04 ~ 3.00E-02
K-40(pCi/mL) 1.04E-01 9.84E-02 - 7.00E+00
Th-228 (pCi/mL) 2.10E-04 8.00E-05 - 4.00E-01
Th-230 (pCi/mL) 1.30E-04 7.00E-05 - 3.00E-01
U-234 (pCi/mL) 2.30E-04 7.00E-05 - 5.00E-01
U-238 (pCi/mL) 1.50E-04 5.00E-05 ~ 6.00E-01
25
Samples were collected on March 11, 1995 from storm water runoff at the inlet/outlet of
culvert # 23, northeast of WMF-635. Samples were collected into a bucket. Liquid was transferred from
the bucket to the sample containers. The weather was wet, cold, and windy. The flow was recorded at
102.56 1pm. The rainfall for this event was 0.24 inches. The duration of the event was 16 hours and
25 minutes. Elevated magnesium levels were identified at all RWMC locations. This was a result of
magnesium chloride (MgCl ) salts applied as dust suppressant to roads. This practice was discontinued
2
in 1993. Chemical concentrations did not exceed for the referenced guidelines (Table 14).

Conductivity (uS) 66.0 NA NA NA
PH 7.1 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Demand (mg/L)
TDS (mg/L) 89.0 NA 500 NA
Grease (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Barium (pg/L) ND 100,000 2000 NA
Chromium (ug/L) 10.8 5000 100 2770
Copper (ug/L) ND NA 1300 3380
Nickel (ug/L) ND NA 100 3980
Lead (ug/L) 4.2 5000 15 620
Antimony (|i.g/L) ND NA 6 NA
Thallium (ug/L) ND NA 2 NA
Vanadium (ug/L) ND NA NA NA
Zinc (ug/L) 52.2 NA 5000 2610

Th-230 (pCi/mL) 8.00E-05 4.00E-05 3.00E-01
U-234 (pCi/mL) 2.00E-04 7.00E-05 5.00E-01
U-238 (pCi/mL) 1.40E-04 5.00E-05 6.00E-01
26
4.8 RWMC-MP-1/2(GRAB)
Samples were collected March 11,1995fromstorm water runoff at the inlet or outlet of culvert #16,
just before the bridge to SWEPP. The rainfall for this event was 0.24 inches. The duration of the event
was 16 hours and 25 minutes. The field measurement of pH was recorded to be 6.4 (Table 15). The
SDWA recommends a range of 6.5-8.5. Lead was reported to be 18.8 ppb and the SDWA standard action
level is 15 ppb. Elevated magnesium levels were identified at all RWMC locations. This was a result
of magnesium chloride (MgCl ) salts applied as dust suppressant to roads. This practice was discontinued
2
in 1993.

Conductivity (jxS) 331 NA NA NA
pH 6.4 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Cyanide (u,g/L) ND NA 200 1200
Demand (mg/L)
as Ammonia (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Silver (|xg/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (|xg/L) 10.6 5000 50 70
Barium (u,g/L) 304 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (u.g/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (p.g/L) 28.6 5000 100 2770
Copper (p.g/L) 33.5 NA 1300 3380
Mercury (|xg/L) ND 200 2 250
Magnesium (p-g/L) 20900 NA NA NA
Soluble (ng/L)
Lead (pg/L) 18.8 5000 15 620
Selenium ((xg/L) ND 1000 50 50
Zinc (p-g/L) 133 NA 5000 2610
27
Gross Beta (pCi/mL) ND 0.050
K-40 (pCi/mL) 6.00E-02 4.32E-02 7.00E+00
28
Samples were collected on May 6, 1995 from storm water runoff and sent to the laboratories on
May 10, 1995. The rainfall for this event was 0.56 inches. The duration of the event was 19 hours and
20 minutes. Lead was reported at a concentration of 47.9 ppb and the guidelines per the SDWA standard
is 15.0 ppb as an action level (Table 16). No field notes were available for this sample. Information was
obtained from the chain of custody. The duration of the previous period of less than 0.1 inch of rain was
11 hours. VOC samples were obtained, although it can not be verified that the samples were
representative of the storm. Elevated magnesium levels were identified at all RWMC locations. This was
a result of magnesium chloride (MgCl ) salts applied as dust suppressant to roads. This practice was
2
discontinued in 1993.

Cyanide (p.g/L) ND NA 200 1200
Chemical Oxygen 108 NA NA NA
Demand (mg/L)
as Ammonia (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Silver (|ig/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (p.g/L) 17.2 5000 50 70
Barium (pg/L) 828 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (pg/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (pg/L) 66.6 5000 100 2770
Copper (p,g/L) 77.3 NA 1300 3380
Mercury (pg/L) ND 200 2 250
Magnesium, 18,700 NA NA NA
Soluble (pg/L)
Nickel (pg/L) 72.5 NA 100 3980
Lead (pg/L) 47.9 5000 15 620
Selenium (p.g/L) ND 1000 50 50
Vanadium (pg/L) 73.6 NA NA NA
Zinc (pg/L) 298 NA 5000 2610
29
Parameter Sample results Uncertainty SDWA DCG
Am-241 (pCi/mL) 3.02E-03 4.30E-04 — 3.00E-02
H-3 (pCi/mL) 3.72E+00 6.80E-01 20 2.00E+03
K-40 (pCi/mL) 2.60E-01 5.07E-02 — 7.00E+00
Pu-239/240 (pCi/mL) 2.80E-04 9.00E-05 ~ ~
Sr-90 (pCi/mL) 8.40E-04 7.20E-04 0.008 1.00E+00
Th-228 (pCi/mL) 3.50E-04 8.00E-05 — 4.00E-01
Th-230 (pCi/mL) 6.40E-04 1.30E-04 ~ 3.00E-01
Th-232 (pCi/mL) 6.00E-05 3.00E-05 — 5.00E-02
U-234 (pCi/mL) 1.01E-03 1.70E-04 — 5.00E-01
U-238 (pCi/mL) 5.20E-04 1.1.0E-04 — 6.00E-01
Table 16V. Volatile organics data for RWMC-MP-2/1-G on 05/06/95.

Parameter Results Units Qualifier Flag
Methyl Acetate (TIC) 20.00 ^g/L NJ
Methylene Chloride 5.00 ug/L B
N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound. This flag is only used for TICs, where the
identification is based on a mass spectral library search. It is applied to all TIC results. For generic
characterization of a TIC, such as chlorinated hydrocarbon, the N code is not used.
J = indicates an estimated value. This flag is used under the following circumstances: (1) when
estimating a concentration for TICs where 1:1 response is assumed; or (2) when the mass spectral
data indicate the presence of a compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less
than the specified detection limit but greater than zero. For example, if the limit of detection is
10 ng/L and a concentration of 3 jxg/L is calculated, it is reported at 3 J.
B = This flag is used when the analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample. It
indicates possible/probable blank contamination. This flag is also used for a TIC as well as a
positively identified TCL compound.
30
4.10 RWMC-MP-2/1 (COMPOSITE)
Samples were collected on May 6, 1995 from storm water runoff and sent to the laboratory on
May 10, 1995. The rainfall recorded form this event was 0.56 inches. The duration of the event was 19
hours and 20 minutes. Chemical concentrations did not exceed any referenced guidelines for any
parameters (Table 17). No field notes were available for this sample. Information was obtained from the
chain of custody. Field measurements were not recorded. Permit requires pH be measured. VOC
samples were obtained, although it can not be verified that the samples were representative of the storm.
Elevated magnesium levels were identified at all RWMC locations. This was a result of magnesium
chloride (MgCl ) salts applied as dust suppressant to roads. This practice was discontinued in 1993.
2
Table 17. Comparison of RWMC-MP-2/1-C Data on 05/06/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Parameter Sample Result RCRA Guidelines SDWA Guidelines Cityl
Cyanide (pg/L) ND NA 200 1200
Demand (mg/L)
as Ammonia (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Silver (pg/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (pg/L) ND 5000 50 70
Barium (pg/L) 298 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (pg/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (pg/L) 19.7 5000 100 2770
Copper (pg/L) 28.7 NA 1300 3380
Mercury (pg/L) ND 200 2 250
Soluble (pg/L)
Lead (pg/L) 13.2 5000 15 620
Zinc (pg/L) 139 NA 5000 2610
31
Table 17R. RWMC-MP-2/1-C radiological data from 05/06/95.
Parameters Sample results Uncertainty SDWA DCG
Am-241 (pCi/mL) 9.10E-03 1.10E-03 3.00E-02
K-40 (pCi/mL) 1.75E-01 7.74E-02 7.00E+00
Th-228 (pCi/mL) 1.00E-04 3.00E-05 4.00E-01
Th-230 (pCi/mL) 2.40E-04 6.00E-05 3.00E-01
Th-232 (pCi/mL) 6.00E-05 2.00E-05 5.00E-02
U-234 (pCi/mL) 1.00E-03 1.50E-04 5.00E-01
U-235 (pCi/mL) 3.00E-05 2.00E-05 6.00E-01
U-238 (pCi/mL) 5.20E-04 9.00E-05 6.00E-01
Table 17V. Volatile organics data for RWMC-MP-2/1-C on 05/06/95.

positively identified TCL compound.
32
I
N
671000
(70500
670000
666500
ffSOOO >f-j > c
(66000
^
667S00
667000
666900
NOTE: Samplet m a j be collected

at i n l e t or o u t l e t of
c u1 r e r t.
Enlarged View
LEGEND
Roods k Buildings
x x
Fences
""" ~ Big Lost River System
Date Drawn : June 0 9 , 1995
^ " ^ Culverts i
1000 2000 Feet
% Monitoring points
(/u2/eulverts: rwmc8xl1)
Figure 3. RWMC p o i n t s for t h e Storm Water Monitoring Program.
5. TEST AREA NORTH (TAN) TECHNICAL SUPPORT FACILITY (TSF)
5.1 TSF-MP-2/2 (GRAB)
Samples were collected on January 11, 1995 from snow melt at the TAN drainage disposal 02 in
basin #782 off of Snake Avenue. Samples were collected using a beaker to collect the flow as it discharged
from the inlet pipe into the pond. The liquid was cloudy. The weather was sunny and windy with a
temperature of approximately 35pF. Flow was estimated to be 10 1pm from the inlet pipe into the pond.
Chemical concentrations did not exceed the recommended guideline concentrations for any of the parameters
(Table 18).
Table 18. Comparison of TSF-MP-2/2-G Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

pH 6.4 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Chemical Oxygen ND NA NA NA
Demand (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (ug/L) ND ' 5000 50 70
Copper (|ig/L) ND NA 1300 3380
Lead (ng/L) 6.0 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 64.7 NA 5000 2610
Table 18R. TSF-MP-2/2-G radiological data from 01/11/95.

35
Samples were collected on January 11, 1995 from snow melt at the TAN drainage disposal 01 in
basin #1720 at Nile and Lincoln. The flow was recorded to be 0.625 cfs. Samples were collected at the
mouth of the pond. Lead was reported to be 17.3 ppb (ug/L) (Table 19). The SDWA standard action level
for lead is 15 ppb.

pH 7.6 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Alkalinity (mg/L) 64.0 NA NA NA
TOC(mg/L) 11.2 NA NA NA
Grease (mg/L)
Silver (ng/L) ND 5000 100 450
Chromium (ug/L) 16.8 5000 100 2770
Copper (ug/L) 35.2 NA 1300 3380
Lead(ngZL) 17.3 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 180 NA 5000 2610
Table 19R. TSF-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 01/11/95.

Gross Alpha (pCi/mL) 2.42E-03 9.00E-04 0.015 —
36
Samples were collected on March 11,1995 from storm water runoff. A grab sample was collected
manually from the culvert approximately 60 to 70 feet upstream from Basin #1720 at Nile and Lincoln.
TAN drainage disposal 01 is located there. Flow was 601pm. The rainfall for this event was 0.09 inches.
The duration of the event was 21 hours and 50 minutes. Chemical concentrations did not exceed any of the
referenced guidelines for any parameters (Table 20).

PH 7.9 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Grease (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Chromium (ng/L) 15.5 5000 100 2770
Copper (ug/L) 29.3 NA 1300 3880
Lead (ug/L) 14.3 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 113 NA 5000 2610
Table 20R. TSF-MP-1/2-G radiological datafrom03/11/95.

K-40 (pCi/mL) 6.87E-02 7.72E-02 7.00E+00
37
Samples were collected on March 21,1995 from storm water runoff at the TAN drainage disposal 02
in basin #782 off of Snake Avenue. Storm water samples were takenfromwater flowing into the basin and
analyzed by Weston laboratory for storm water analytes. Additional samples were taken from the basin and
analyzed by AccuLabs for drinking water parameters. The rainfall for the event was 0.10 inches and the
duration of the event was 45 minutes. Flow was recorded at 4.71 1pm. The Color indicator index was
reported at 5.0 while the SDWA standard is 3.0 (Table 21).
Table 2 1 . Comparison of TSF-MP-2/2-G Data on 03/21/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Parameter Sample Result RCRA Guidelines SDWA Guidelines City!
Conductivity 370 NA NA NA
(umhos/cm)
Field Conductivity 271 NA NA NA
(uS)
Alkalinity (mg/L) 140 NA NA NA
Chloride (mg/L) 16.0 NA 250 NA
Cyanide (jig/L) ND NA 200 1200
Color (C.U.) 5.0 NA 3 NA
Fluoride (mg/L) ND NA 4 NA
Hardness 170 NA NA NA
(as CaC03) (mg/L)
Langelier Index 0.49 NA NA NA
Nitrite, as Nitrogen ND NA NA NA
(mg/L)
Nitrate, as Nitrogen 1.1 NA 10 NA
(mg-N/L)
Odor(T.O.N.) 1.0* NA 15 NA
Salinity (g/kg) ND NA NA NA
Silica (mg/L) 8.8 NA NA NA
Sulfate (mg/L) 33.0 NA 250 NA
TDS (mg/L) 220* NA 500 NA
Grease (mg/L)
Turbidity (NTU) 1.2 NA NA NA
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Aluminum (ng/L) ND NA NA NA
Barium (ng/L) 80.0 100,000 2000 NA
Beryllium (jig/L) ND NA 4 NA
Calcium (ng/L) 49000 NA NA NA
Cadmium (ug/L) 0.80 1000 5 690
Chromium (|ig/L) 5.0 5000 100 2770
Iron (ug/L) 60.0 NA 300 NA
38
Potassium (ug/L) 2500 NA NA NA
Manganese (ug/L) ND NA 50 NA
Sodium (ug/L) 7300 NA 20000 NA
Lead (ug/L) ND 5000 15 620
Antimony (ug/L) ND NA 6 NA
Thallium (ug/L) ND- NA 2 NA
Zinc (ug/L) 20.0 NA 5000 2610
* - This result was assigned a data useability level of'failed' as a result of the validation assessment.
Analyses performed by AccuLabs Research, Inc.
Table 21 A. Comparisoni of TSF-MP-2/2-G Data on 03/21/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Field Conductivity (uS) 271 NA NA NA
pH 8.4 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Chemical Oxygen ND NA NA NA
Demand (mg/L)
TSS (mg/L) ND NA NA NA
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Chromium (ug/L) 21.0 5000 100 2770
Copper(ug/L) 30.5 NA 1300 3880
Lead (ug/L) 19.0 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 156 NA 5000 2610
Analyses performed by Weston Laboratolies.
39
Cs-134+137 (pCi/mL) 4.00E-04 8.00E-04 — —
H-3 (pCi/mL) 3.70E-01 2.20E-01 20 2.00E+03
K-40 (pCi/mL) -1.60E-03 6.30E-02 — 7.00E+00
Ra-226 (pCi/mL) 2.00E-04 4.00E-04 — 1.00E-01
Ra-228 (pCi/mL) 1.00E-04 4.00E-04 — 1.00E-01
Strontium-89/90 (pCi/mL) 1.00E-04 5.00E-04 0.008 —
U-233+234 (pCi/mL) 1.90E-03 5.00E-04 — —
U-235 (pCi/mL) 1.00E-04 1.00E-04 — 6.00E-01
U-238 (pCi/mL) 8.00E-04 3.00E-04 — 6.00E-01
Table 21 RA. TSF-MP-2/2-G radiological datafrom03/21/95.

K-40 (pCi/mL) 3.43E-02 7.61E-2 7.00E+00
Analyses performed by Analytical Technology, Inc.
Table 21 SV. Semivolatile organics data for TSF-MP-2/2-G on 03/21/95.

Parameter Results Units SDWA Qualifier flag
Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1.50 ug/L 6 None
40
5.5 TSF-MP-1/2(GRAB)
Samples were collected on March 21,1995fromstorm water runoff at the TAN drainage disposal 01
in basin #1720 at Nile and Lincoln. The field team took two sets of samples which were sent to two
laboratories. The rainfall recorded for this event was 0.10 inches and the duration of this event was 45
minutes. Lead was reported as 19.0 ppb and the action level per the SDWA is 15.0 ppb (Table 22).
Table 22. Comparison of TSF-MP-1/2-G Data on 03/21/95 to Reeulatorv Guidelines.

Conductivity (umhos/cm) 380 NA NA NA
Chloride (mg/L) 27.0 NA 250 NA
Cyanide (ng/L) ND NA 200 1200
Color (C.U.) 25.0 NA 3 NA
Fluoride (mg/L) ND NA 4 NA
(as CaC03) (mg/L)
Langelier Index -0.34 NA NA NA
Nitrogen, 0.12 NA 10 NA
Nitrate-Nitrite (mg-N/L)
(mg/L)
(mg-N/L)
Odor(T.O.N.) 3.0* NA 15 NA
Grease (mg/L)
Turbidity (NTU) 200, NA NA NA
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Aluminum (ug/L) 8900 NA NA NA
Arsenic (ug/L) 12.0 5000 50 70
Barium (ng/L) 180 100,000 2000 NA
Beryllium (ng/L) ND NA 4 NA
Calcium (ng/L) 33000 NA NA NA
Cadmium (|ig/L) 0.70 1000 5 690
Chromium (ng/L) 17.0 5000 100 2770
Copper (|ig/L) 27.0 NA 1300 3380
Iron (fig/L) 9000 NA 300 NA
Mercury (ug/L) 0.10 200 2 250
Potassium (ng/L) 5600 NA NA NA
41
Manganese (ng/L) 130 NA 50 NA
Sodium (p.g/L) 30000 NA 20000 NA
Nickel (ug/L) 22.0 NA 100 3980
Lead (ng/L) 13.0 5000 15 620
Antimony (ng/L) ND NA 6 NA
Thallium (ng/L) ND NA 2 NA
Zinc (|ig/L) 88.0 NA 5000 2610
Table 22A. Comparison of TSF-MP-1/2-G Data on 03/21/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

pH 7.6 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Alkalinity (mg/L) 117 NA NA -NA
Grease (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (u.g/L) ND 5000 50 70
Barium (u.g/L) ND 100,000 2000 . NA
Cadmium (|ig/L) 5.5 1000 5 690
Copper (jig/L) ND NA 1300 3380
Lead (ug/L) ND 5000 15 620
Zinc (ng/L) 82.4 NA 5000 2610
Analyses performed by Weston Liiboratories.
42
Cs-134 (pCi/mL) -5.20E-03 8.80E-03 ~ 2.00E+00
Cs-137 (pCi/mL) -1.20E-03 1.50E-02 — 3.00E+00
H-3 (pCi/mL) 2.00E-01 2.10E-01 20- 2.00E+03
K-40 (pCi/mL) 3.80E-02 7.30E-02 — 7.00E+00
Ra-226 (pCi/mL) 3.00E-04 5.00E-04 — 1.00E-01
Ra-228 (pCi/mL) 8.00E-04 5.00E-04 — 1.00E-01
Strontium-89/90 (pCi/mL) -3.00E-03 6.00E-04 0.008 —
U-233+234 (pCi/mL) 5.00E-04 2.00E-04 — —
U-235 (pCi/mL) 1.00E-04 1.00E-04 — 6.00E-01
U-239 (pCi/mL) 4.00E-04 2.00E-04 — 6.00E-01
Analyses performed by AccuLabs Research, Inc
Table 22RA. TSF-MP-1/2-G radiological datafrom03/21/95.

Gross Beta (pCi/mL) ND — 0.050 —
Pb-214 (pCi/mL) 1.03E-03 4.03E-04 ~ 2.00E+02
Ra-226 (pCi/mL) 1.03E-03 4.03E-04 1.00E-01
Analyses performed by Analytical Technology, Inc.
43
{
7)1000
7 ) 7 500
717000
7SS500
7)5S00
7S5000
7J4500
7)4000
LEGEND
Roads & Buildings

« * fences
# Monitoring Points
<S> Surface Water Runoff

v
Injection Wells Date Drawn : May 2 5 , 1995
Y/////\ Birch Creek Playc

O 500 1000 1500 Feet
(/u2/culverts: tsf8x11)
'igure 4. TSF p o i n t s and w e l l s for t h e Storm Water M o n i t o r i n g Program.
6. POWER BURST FACILITY (PBF)
6.1 PBF-MP-1/2 (GRAB)
Samples were collected on February 03,1995 from snow melt at the outlet of the culvert on Navajo
road, south of PBF-614. The samples were collected with a bucket. The flow was recorded to be 0.062 cfs.
Chemical concentrations did not exceed the referenced guidelines for any parameters (Table 23). The
weather was sunny and warm with temperatures approximately 40pF.
Table 23. Comparison of PBF-MP-1/2-G Data on 02/03/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

pH 6.9 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Lead (ug/L) ND 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 45.6 NA 5000 2610
Table 23R. PBF-MP-1/2-G radiological datafrom02/03/95.

Gamma Spec (pCi/mL) ND — 4 (mrem/yr]I
45
6.2 PBF-MP-3/2 (GRAB)
Samples were collected on June 7,1995 from storm water runoff located near the SPERT Disposal
Well number 2. Water was up to and flowing into the well. Samples were collected at the area near the
opening of the well. Flow into the well casing at the time of sampling was approximately 1.7 cfm. The
rainfall recorded forthis event was 1.83 inches and the duration of the event was 29 hours and 20 minutes.
Results are reported in Table 24. Lead was recorded at 17.0 ppb and the SDWA standard action level is 15.0
ppb. Manganese was recorded at 950 ppb and the SDWA guideline is 50 ppb. Iron was at 66,000 ppb and
300 ppb is the referenced concentration per the SDWA. Chromium was reported to be 110 ppb and the
SDWA referenced concentrations is 100 ppb. Both Beryllium and Arsenic were reported at the referenced
SDWA guideline of 4.0 ppb (Be) and 50 ppb (As).
Table 24. Comparison of PBF-MP-3/2-G Data on 06/07/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Conductivity (p.S) 140 NA NA NA
Field Conductivity 70.0 NA NA NA
(uS)
pH 7.8 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Field pH 8.5 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Chloride (mg/L) ND NA 250 NA
Cyanide (ug/L) ND ' NA 200 1200
Carbonate (mg/L) ND NA NA NA
Color (C.U.) 500 NA 3 NA
Fluoride (mg/L) ND NA 4 • . NA
Bicarbonate (mg/L) 100.0 NA NA NA
(as CaC03) (mg/L)
Langelier Index (mg/L) -0.17 NA NA NA
(mg/L)
(mg-N/L)
Odor(T.O.N.) 3.0 NA 15 NA
Hydroxide (mg/L) ND NA NA NA
Grease (mg/L)
Turbidity (NTU) 1800 NA NA NA
46
Table 24. (Continued).
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Aluminum (ug/L) 52000 NA NA NA
Arsenic (u.g/L) 50.0 5000 50 70
Barium (ug/L) 990 100,000 2000 NA
Beryllium (ug/L) 4.0 NA 4 NA
Calcium (ug/L) 48000 NA NA NA
Cadmium (ug/L) 2.1 1000 5 690
Chromium (ug/L) 110 5000 100 2770
Copper(ug/L) 96.0 NA 1300 3380
Iron (ug/L) 66000 NA 300 NA
Mercury (ug/L) 0.20 200 2 250
Potassium (|Ag/L) 17000 NA NA NA
Manganese (ug/L) 950 NA 50 NA
Sodium (ug/L) 4500 NA 20000 NA
Nickel (ug/L) 120 NA 100 3980
Lead (|ig/L) 17.0 5000 15 620
Antimony (ug/L) ND .NA 6 NA
Zinc (ug/L) 490 NA 5000 2610
Table 24R. PBF-MP-3/2-G radiological data from 06/07/95.

Cs-134+137 (pCi/mL) 1.00E-03 1.10E-03 — —
H-3 (pCi/mL) 1.10E-01 2.00E-01 20 2.00E+03
Ra-226 (pCi/mL) 2.60E-03 0.90E-03 — 1.00E-01
Ra-228 (pCi/mL) 4.30E-03 0.80E-03 — 1.00E-01
Strontium-89/90 (pCi/mL) 1.10E-03 0.70E-03 0.008 —
U-233+234 (pCi/mL) 1.50E-03 0.30E-03 — —
U-235 (pCi/mL) 4.00E-04 1.00E-04 — 6.00E-01
U-238 (pCi/mL) 1.80E-03 0.30E-03 — 6.00E-01
47
LEGEND
Roads & Buildings

^ *• Fences
® Monitoring Points Date Drawn : Uay 2 5 , 1995

<S> Surface Water Runoff 1000 2000 Feet
Injection Wells
(/u2/cuIveris: werfBxIl)
Figure 5. WFRF p o i n t s and wells for the Storm Water Monitoring Program,
7. IDAHO CHEMICAL PROCESSING PLANT (ICPP)
7.1 1CPP-MP-1/1 (GRAB)
Samples were collected on October 4,1994 from storm water runoff at the East Perimeter Road near
the culvert south of the Sewage Treatment Plant (STP). The average flow for this event was 388.07 1pm.
The total cumulative volume discharged was 168,030 Liters. The total rainfall for this event was 0.45 inches
and the duration of the event was 12 hours and 40 minutes. Volatile organic analyses (Table B-1) were
performed and no detections were reported. Chemical concentrations did not exceed the referenced
standards for any parameters (Table 25). The grab sample was not taken within thefirstthirty minutes of
the storm.
Table 25. Comparison of ICPP-MP-1/l-G Data on 10/04/94 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Conductivity (uS) 79.0 ' NA NA NA
pH 8.03 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Biological Oxygen 5.0 NA NA NA
Demand (5-day) (mg/L)
Demand (mg/L)
(mg-N/L)
Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 0.33 NA NA NA
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Total Oil & 210 NA NA 250
Grease (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Chromium ND 5000 100 , 2770
Lead (ng/L) 7.1 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 681 NA 5000 2610
49
Table 25R. ICPP-MP-1/l-G radiological from 10/04/94.
Gross Alpha (pCi/mL) 5.00E-02 3.00E-02 0.015
7.2 ICPP-MP-1/1 (COMPOSITE)
Samples were collected on October 4,1994 from storm water runoff at the East Perimeter Road near
the culvert south of the STP. A grab sample was taken manually because of equipment malfunction. The
grab sample was taken from water in the collection basin. The sample will be used to represent a composite
of the event. The average flow for this event was the same as the previous sample. Volatile organic analyses
(Table B-1) were performed and no detections were reported. Chemical concentrations did not exceed the
reference standards for any parameters (Table 26).
Table 26. Comparison of ICPP-MP-1/l-C Data on 10/04/94 to Regulatory Guidelines.

PH 7.95 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Demand (mg/L)
(mg-N/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Chromium (fig/L) ND 5000 100 2770
Copper (jxg/L) ND NA 1300 3380
Lead (|ig/L) 6.6 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 482 NA 5000 2610
51
Table 26R. ICPP-MP-1/l-C radiological data from 10/04/95.
Gross Alpha (pCi/mL) 3 .OOE-02 2.00E-02 0.015
52
7.3 ICPP-MP-2/1 (GRAB)
Samples were collected on January 11,1995 from snow melt at the southwest side of the coal pile as
liquid enters the ditch. The flow was estimated to be 1.25 cfm. It was noted that the runoff was black
colored due to the coal pile. Chemical concentrations did not exceed the reference standards for any
parameters (Table 27). Weather was sunny and windy with an approximate temperature of 40pF. The coal
pile has numeric limits for TSS (50 mg/L) and pH (5.4-9.0). The concentration for TSS was 245 mg/L.
However, this does not exceed permit limits because the water was retained within the basin.
Table 27. Comparison of ICPP-MP-2/1-G Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

pH 7.5 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Nitric Acid (mg/L) 2.4 NA NA NA
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (fig/L) ND 5000 50 70
Barium (ng/L) ND 100,000 2000 NA
Chromium (ug/L) ND 5000 100. 2770
Lead (ng/L) 9.2 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 118 NA 5000 2610
Table 27R. ICPP-MP-2/1-G radiological data from 01/11/95.

53
Samples were collected on February 3,1995 from snow melt as it exited the culvert. The flow was
recorded at 0.09 cfs. Volatile organic analysis was run by Method 624 and there was no detectes for the
parameters. Chemical concentrations did not exceed the reference guidelines for any parameters (Table 28).
The numeric limits for TSS is 50 mg/L. However, this does not exceed permit limits because the water was
retained within the basin. The weather was sunny, clear, and approximately 45pF. The chain of custody
sample identification number was ICPP020395-2/1, so the results were reported as ICPP-MP-2/1 but the
location sampled was actually ICPP-MP-1/1 according to the field logbook.

pH 7.5 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Biological Oxygen 3.0* NA NA NA
Demand (mg/L)
Nitric Acid (mg/L) 5.6* NA NA NA
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (p.g/L) ND 5000 100 450
Lead (fig/L) 4.1 5000 15 620
Zinc (ng/L) 96.2 NA 5000 2610
* - The result was assigned1 a data useability level of'failed'as a result of the validation assessment.
54
Table 28R. ICPP-MP-2/1-G radiological datafrom02/03/95.
55
Samples were collected on March 11,1995 from storm water runoff at the culvert on the East Perimeter
Road directly south of the STP. Discharge was minimal and only enough flow was allowed for a grab
sample during the first thirty minutes. The flow was recorded at 8.22 1pm. The total volume for the event
was 7,070 Liters. The rainfall recorded for this event was 0.61 inches. The duration of the event was 21
hours and 35 minutes. Lead was reported at 26.0 ppb and the SDWA standard action level is 15 ppb (Table
30). Volatile organic analyses (Table B-l) were performed and no detects were reported.

pH 7.5 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Demand (mg/L)
Nitric Acid (mg/L) 2.8* NA NA NA
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Barium (ug/L) 446 100,000 2000 NA
Chromium (ng/L) 39.4 5000 100 2770
Copper (ug/L) 46.8 NA 1300 3380
Lead (ug/L) 26.0 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 291 NA 5000 2610
* - This result was assigned a data useabiliry level of'failed' as a result of the validal ion assessment.
Table 30R. ICPP-MP-1/l-G radiological data from 03/11/95.

K-40 (pCi/mL) 1.08E-01 7.86E-02 — 7.00E+00
58
Samples were collected on May 3,1995 from storm water runoff at the East Perimeter Road culvert
located south of the STP. The samples were takenfromthe compositor and represent the first thirty minutes
of the storm. The rainfall recorded for this event was 0.15 inches. The total volume was 30,780 Liters for
the event. The duration of the event was 1 hour and 55 minutes. Lead was reported to be a concentration
of 79.5 ppb and SDWA standard action level is 15.0 ppb (Table 31).
Table 3 1 . Comparison of ICPP-MP-1/l-G Data on 05/03/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

PH 7.9 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Biological Oxygen ND NA NA NA
Demand (mg/L)
as Ammonia (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Barium (ug/L) 205 100,000 2000 NA
Chromium (ug/L) 22.5 5000 100 2770
Lead (ug/L) 79.5 5000 15 620
Thallium (ug/L) ND • NA 2 NA
Zinc (ug/L) 471 NA 5000 2610
59
Table 31R. ICPP-MP-1/l-G radiological data from 05/03/95.
K-40 (pCi/mL) 9.82E-02 7.68E-02 7.00E+00
Table 31V. Volatile organics data for ICPP-MP-1/l-G on 05/03/95.

Parameter Results Units Qualifier Flag SDWA
Methylene Chloride 2.00 ug/L JB
J = Indicates an estimated value. This flag is used under the following circumstances: (1) when
estimating a concentration for TICs where a 1:1 response is assumed; or (2) when the mass spectral
data indicate the presence of a compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less
than the specified detection limit but greater than zero. For example, if the limit of detection is
10 ug/L and a concentration of 3 ug/L is calculated, it is reported as 3 J.
positively identified compound.
60
7.8 ICPP-MP-1/1 (COMPOSITE)
Samples were collected on May 3,1995 from storm water runoff at the culvert located on the East
Perimeter Road south of the STP. Samples were taken from the compositor. The rainfall recorded for this
event was 0.15 inches. The duration of the event was 1 hour and 55 minutes. Lead was reported to be 37.1
ppb and the SDWA standard action level is 15.0 ppb (Table 32).
Table 32. Comparison of ICPP-MP-1/l-C Data on 05/03/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

pH 8.5 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Biological Oxygen ND NA NA NA
Chemical Oxygen ' 13.8 NA NA NA
Demand (mg/L)
as Ammonia (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Barium (ug/L) 212 100,000 2000 NA
Chromium (ug/L) 23.1 5000 100 2770
Copper (ug/L) 29.1 NA 1300 3380
Lead (ug/L) 37.1 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 510 NA 5000 2610
Table 32R. ICPP-MP-1/l-C radiological data from 05/03/95.

Gross Alpha (pCi/mL) ND — 0.015 ~
61
Table 32V. Volatile organics data for ICPP-MP-1/l-C on 05/03/95.
positively identified compound.
62
—7j—> 1—f • y 4
LEGEND
Roods 4 Buildings
Date Drown : June 09, 199!
~~ ~ Big Lost River System 0 500 1000 Feet
(Q Monitoring points (/u2/culveris: cpp8x11)
F i g u r e 6. ICPP p o i n t s f o r t h e S t o r m W a t e r M o n i t o r i n g P r o g r a m .
8. TEST AREA NORTH (TAN)
8.1 CTF-MP-1/2 (GRAB)
Samples were collected on January 11,1995fromsnow melt in the ditch south of TAN-631. The flow
was running into the holding pond. Samples were collected at the culvert at Snake Avenue, approximately
40 feetfromthe mouth of the holding pond. Samples were collected using a dipper to collect the liquid into
a bucket. Flow was estimated to be 61pm. Lead was reported to be 18.6 ppb (ug/L) (Table 33). The SDWA
standard action level for lead is 15 ppb.
Table 33. Comparison of CTF-MP-1/2-G Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

pH 7.7 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Demand (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
TSS (mg/L) 195 NA NA- NA
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Barium (|ig/L) 229 100,000 2000 NA
Cadmium (ng/L) ND 1000 5 690
Chromium (ng/L) 17.3 5000 100 2770
Copper (ug/L) 28.7 NA 1300 3380
Lead (ng/L) 18.6 5000 15 620
Selenium (|Ag/L) ND 1000 50 50
Zinc (ug/L) 135 NA 5000 2610
Table 33R. CTF-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 01/11/95.

Zn-65 (pCi/mL) 6.46E-03 6.63E-03 9.00E+00
65
8.2 SMC-MP-1/2(GRAB)
Samples were collected on January 11, 1995 from snow melt on the west side of Specific
Manufacturing Capabilities (SMC) on Taylor Creek Road. Grab samples were takenfromthe inlet pipe and
flow was estimated to be 48 1pm. Chemical concentrations did not exceed the reference guidance
concentrations for any parameters (Table 34). The weather was sunny and windy with an approximate
temperature of 37pF.
Table 34. Comparison of SMC-MP-1/2-G Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

pH 6.9 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Biological Oxygen 5:0 NA NA NA
Demand (mg/L)
Nitrogen, Total . 0.90 NA NA NA
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Lead (ug/L) 3.2 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 186 NA 5000 2610
Table 34R. SMC-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 01/11/95.

66
8.3 SMC-MP-1/2 (COMPOSITE)
Samples were collected on January 11,1995fromsnow melt on the west side of SMC on Taylor Creek
Road. Flow was estimated to be 48 1pmfromthe inlet pipe. The sample was takenfromthe basin water.
Chemical concentrations did not exceed any of the reference guidelines for any parameters (Table 35). A
composite sample was takenfromthe ponded liquid in the basin
Table 35. Comparison of SMC-MP-1/2-C Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

pH 7.1 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Demand (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Barium (ug/L) ND 100,000. 2000 NA
Cadmium (ug/L) ND 1000 5 v
690
Nickel (ug/L) ND NA 100 " 3980
Lead (ng/L) ND 5000 15 620
Selenium (|ig/L) ND 1000 50 50
Zinc (ug/L) 139 NA 5000 2610
Table 35R. SMC-MP-1/2-C radiological datafrom01/11/95.

67
Samples were collected on March 10,1995fromstorm water runoff on the west side of SMC on Taylor
Creek Road. Water was running at a low volume from the discharge pipe and had started to pond in the
retention basin. A grab sample was collected manuallyfromthe water in the basin, but will be referred to
as a composite because it represents a composite of what was discharged into the basin. Flow was 13 1pm.
Sample identifier for the sample recorded on the chain of custody was SMC031095-1/2G. The weather was
cool, cloudy, and approximately 50pF (Table 36)

Conductivity (nS) 446 NA NA NA
pH 7.2 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Demand (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Barium (fig/L) ND 100,000 2000 NA
Lead (ug/L) 5.0 5000 15 620
Zinc (fig/L) 85.9 NA 5000 2610
Table 36R. SMC-MP-1/2-G radiological datafrom03/10/95.

Gross Beta (pCi/mL) 7.20E-03 1.30E-03 0.050 ~
K-40 (pCi/mL) 7.81E-02 7.74E-02 — 7.00E+00
68
8.5 SMC-MP-1/2(GRAB)
Samples were collected on March 11,1995fromstorm water runoff on the west side of SMC on Taylor
Creek Road. These were grab samples collected by the compositor. Total Oil & Grease was collected
directly into the sample container. Flow information could not be collected because the flow meter
malfunctioned during the discharge. Lead was reported to be 38.5 ppb and SDWA standard action level is
15.0 ppb (Table 37). The remaining concentrations were below guidelines.

pH 7.5 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Demand (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Grease (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
Silver ftxg/L) ND 5000 100 450
Arsenic (ug/L) 12.0 5000 50 70
Barium (ug/L) 239 100,000 2000 NA
Chromium (ng/L) 37.9 5000 100 2770
Copper (ng/L) 45.7 NA 1300 3380
Nickel (ug/L) 40.0 NA 100 3980
Lead (ug/L) 38.5 5000 15 620
Zinc (ng/L) 369 NA 5000 2610
Table 37R. SMC-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 03/11/95.

69
Samples were collected on March 11,1995 from storm water runoff on the west side of SMC on Taylor
Creek Road (Table 38). The rainfall recorded for this event was 0.09 inches. The duration of the event was
21 hours and 50 minutes. Lead was reported to be 22.5 ppb and SDWA standard action level is 15.0 ppb.
The remaining chemical concentrations did not exceed any of the referenced guidelines for any parameters.
Table 38. Comparison of SMC-MP-1/2-C Data on 03/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

pH 7.0 2.5-12 6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
Demand (mg/L)
Kjeldahl (mg/L)
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
TSS(mg/L) 766 NA NA NA
Silver (ug/L) ND 5000 100 450
Chromium (ng/L) 26.3 5000 100 2770
Copper (ug/L) 32.3 NA 1300 3880
Lead (ug/L) 22.5 5000 15 620
Zinc (ug/L) 139 NA 5000 2610
Table 38R. SMC-MP-1/2-C radiological data from 03/11/95.

K-40 (pCi/mL) 9.79E-02 7.81E-02 7.00E+00
70
SO 10 00
{
LEGEND
Roads k Buildings
~^' Fences
Date Drown : June 09, 1995
# Monitoring points
y////\ Birch Creek Playa
0 500 1000 Feet
(/u2/cukerfs: loft8x11]
Figure 7. LOFT p o i n t s for t h e Storm Water M o n i t o r i n g Program.
9. TEST REACTOR AREA
Flow did not occur at the two monitoring points at TRA.

1
C99000
LEGEND
Roads k Buildings
^ ^ fences Date Drawn : May 25, 1995
® Monitoring points 500 1000 Feet
(/u2/culverts: tro8x11)
4gure 8. TRA p o i n t s f o r t h e Storm Water M o n i t o r i n g Program,
Appendix A
Field Logbook
A-2
i
tk-y-f-f t/%Us /Tznz-'^p^ ! M i

i i ; i ! !
i
i ir ^ !
i i ! 1j 1
:
^•fta'/i 0&Ct*'£Z> l^c^/UrkJyixi^k^- i ^ i
..C&4&A& u _J2t^ladÛ i
i i 1 1 i. 1 1 : i
! 1 i 1 ! i 1 1
t 7
JLJh- T i0<?£t " * J - br^/d whs 1 AlJ.cJvd hi rdeA'r^tX^ >'<\ J> &/*L:Jh*Ar
' v • > 4 - 7 * <L i ^ J f W<J &\rkAA
~y . -A ^ <k*D?A* \hJj\ -kJ/?J/i
1 MIX.;5>, S-r&A \A*t *&&<& 1 s ^ J ^ l ^ t ^ k ^ L J & l 4*4 » !
\ fe/j^l&k I T ^ U L , \&l**Jr*y io'K 1 jW«/i<:L^ ! <
]&&& \ A* &r,V. -J*CI b J ^ M dw 1 cA6i WWÂ-/&> 1 7 b ^ / J 1*£ i |
\A6A*AA \ztr ^ K X J ^ I ' J ^ Jz/4vl UJL/\;£Ld* ^'X \»X/U\
i Af&l '4C\ k2L ^SM^vbA iM&S /*r,h±/ 1 -TW l ^ / X J - ,<J*A,4.4£J:
ha/^ u 4cl U d & i ^ l ^ l yU!t-*Lldrl^S-Û^> IAW: fe!^d 1 1
i / ? & & ; : 1* /7^/teJ>!«' ^T * sA-J, \?AAJ*L<y ^ 4 - U rî / b * 1
hJj /s >d/'o^ i «J%d, 4cAJL\: 1 i i I I ! I I
f 1 1 1 • I I . I I
ir c: ^ ^ / ^ / i y ^ r 1 <^€f^7^/?o^? -k-y Jo £3«£ 7?r'i*j*i)j*T \fi( PeVMJ,J\ U ^
c
i
. . QQ*» ip&S f ro^ 1 ^ < o i c &1U&V V « ^ U „ArJ ' i I • x ^ s k ^ L i 1 < I # U L

TA,<S J/J 2U ^ l >y Js^k^ ^ i 4 ^ s AJ/«V ^ U i ^ . ! 1
| 1 I i | 1 j i
i 7 ^ _JLS^• ^ ; ^ 4
"f*r&//£>t Côk. •ik U Z . I M*XA
7rtw-<s £> f 4± M V fe>»}. rSw ^L /4-xC £ -1 o&pzM.^H e. . ifp\oMH
*^«
V
| 1 i i i
!•
> ^
i
| Ii
1
1 i
i
l i
! i
•• 1 I
"T^ 1 11
\"^- t
1
r*""- - * JLV
i
T^L i l
t'h 1 ^ - K \ 11
1
M i l i i
1 i r^ . I I I !
1 ! !
jV~
i : 1 :
1 ! 1 1 1 1 \
1
1 | i 1 I i Continued on Page
Read and Understood By
Signed Date Signed Date

Notebook No.
Continued Prom Pagej
vt?\-#-Hf\ I Yji/3d>\ ! ¥jx)k<l

i i
i I
TV -
j j J | t I / ' • * i •/ '
\ <j?43*7-W
u ' i i v'LO-
r r^ r
k4*L i -7^5U^.i
fc/W 5%WJgd
A-d/?/3*'r
c k W
rrn
¥*
U«U1 <-^rl\is U h s W i (Jxi^
.ifL ! I
-&A- Jd -4-f i !
! I ! i i
' i
7yg??V7
i 7T
^^fe ./Jtîeb ! &JXMC rJii UJ^l/gJ^k-kgl-c
/
~T\lyA \f-^n-'J2.s J^L J • i
\_M
! I
\aUU ry^fo^ 2r
\VLt^\i \6>i<UQlo
& ^-^ zLujki. \.^jus^Pm & ^ :
JU Tvîftir" AklA lHêjck jtf^\j / b ^ WhtAUr

1
\ jj> ÛUr/ÂlrTb^; 0- II A W6Aer-, S - i i y d ^ I AJ'JJ j ^ .s/ft/
r
2? u/;l AlJk
^ Û*w"
il f-
LU^.
~cn?
I !
! ! I
_U-
i > i i i T i l
I I
Continued on Page
Read and Understood 3y
^"
/ok/ft "•ate
i
: ffrV-W riL,5D~) \ i^nr. 1 i i i 11

> 1 1 M '
! 1 ! ! II ! 1l i ! ! • ! ! !
U^y 1 ! !/ ! !
' 1
i i /Pi <&/LJ^/!^K" -U l"T)'i5^^Jf/fl £/*b
i i
^ i 2 r?-V ^ A^7y t&)0/}i4.T<f£, 7S/Z- i*/U 1 i i i

ri | |
i kfZ
1
/ <?hr^/Q/&'5 t 5>^ A? - c / L ^ -4~^ k i - 4 4> J^fsidu LAB
A-&W
i ! 1
H55&*<7^;? l£ ^ £ 7 ? 1 "S^C-/ 1-4- -*~U 5w\£ - / -C 1
*Sbr>»pi*ih. ! *VN Ctf-bo • f V tr /Of.ot > ,?>*

/ /
| | |
{ » <9n>J ( ^ 2*,/ VîWY t^7\ U _g*M5 îJ 4*S tskiJ

\
T
-N.
s V
•
N
\ |
N.
\
\
N
\
\ -
V ^ ) \
\
N r
<yl
fr*/
' / /
v
•v
x
\
\
\
!
i
\ |
s
^
X
\ i
•v
•• i
Continued on Page
A>k/rf Signed Date

Signed Dale
Notebook No.
Continued From Page
-1- U W ^
J-i' I 12 -23 ^1.

N
*>• p~ / ^
JîîJ ^ £ 5 1 k * ,
/
/
', 0 i
\rs' '
id} - J ^ / w i ? >s\
Xl > ~"/"7fjXc A k/r. ^ >s. i.. *1,'. r* <L--** ^ y - '-^^

•; -//b*c &
./- =^-A2L' RL' / ^ A|JA»/> *n Ml z~> '035 /•«C rA *W >s>
J*I-»-
|
f Ti ^ / # ; rf«: (6. ^ - ^ •foio J
w
( • ! * &
l
£> 45^^'- 0 «/£
—
/ & /MC
V
T5 • ^ J>5D . / * - < • (A / 3 CBp/5 -j- f>
•
-f'c
^ ? <$a> /»<: fa t-Z/S'ielv îy
I
X'JJ/A k ^ ,A/; fa h'.J , //"• ft Aorh^<^ 2/ 5 lis
?
r*A/ | / fee / / « . (p. •//Or/* O V.Sb

Mw .-«5 c
7
r ;?mi ) 'hhP /.iC
ft '-ff&'ics X)
A'r$;<,
M.£"Vir (?) >Jo */«- i/.^ t i 6^~>?crtG •j- i
1 7 sJ- /cmm //. >

<jt*> <?o(if
AzSi^
•/ ^ 'jji*
>
:vr-
/
/•
A. *& t 4k
r
//?*• i
j
-$/t ' *>/. ^ ; / j/'i
}
</,6}7?
'.
W\ i ? > J-V/^f J- . / f . 'fr tf c 1?

V
/J
A J -•-
<5"
/j
rt 2-7
i. y
s7c 7 / >^ 0,f /A -/• w
W ^4* * /fl- ^ : * 1 ' '/* ? e» \ '6
•„ e ^ S\ ^ i ! ' ^ 5 •>t.
1
\
1/
7^ \
^
7 ^ ^ "VJ
-0 ^~^
LA
^
A ' r'rl
i '—r
7^
I
/r.l
7
LJ_J ^
'*. f ^
LU
LLI
! j
| i
i
^
•
! i | I
i
i
-Li 1 I
i
i 1 Continued on Page
Sj
/
-> -
sr/rA'/' \o-.6-^
5ned Date Si ;ned Date
W-W
1
1
1
i
i
1
1
1
1
'ft-Si ^//•-j / /£U*/& y i i

1
rj^*, UÎ Vzk* ^ > - 1

!
'J i ! 1!
T" /
. 1
I
l* (u-SC yi I
1
I
i22 l ~/ / IAT? \3J/+JX, <•/• 5 i-r^ £**** ••J L
J/> JiP/5 yfal/*ii^Ld //•.k- /acoUJf'p) \^n•W.e dvol

I 7TM lC£C J a 1/6)1 W/'Afc-/\> 1-1*8*
at>d 1
<^ r^ywl k.
\tt
n* a*)
.%
^ 5 •»(. ^ d ^ * <*?&
<ib **iC 4 v/i%U' il$£ /

tijr ,^ ?^, / •7-v /l'W _4» £*.<- ^ /^•JJ. /Û I îv
-hJ. /tE/ /•:•(. /*v c//4' ^ 'P : ?
AISC^
L — ' -a
;^/c • « <
'"t / • « ) 4Z/5" ';0&& /J j > 4 f
/ 11. ?^ ill fc>^c o o|> [&) /3nla75bfe 'k-

L 1&.' _ ( **/ ,MC <4 V/F^ £> /-/j.5>cv
\ z 'r» *,~, a 5* J /
• Ju '/!?<', )
1
^55f? i"f ^ ) Af/d-
|
HAfc ?
/ / ^ ^ . i " . •>,7V r
<r <* v K-c E =/
/
'<, / " ' / ?£" •S * " ') '<?• «•- 9/
S * • / ! • ! ,
/
•ifec " k^t
./ //A
_& ,4 / •£••5 - ' / V _S>/ "V? / **/-< >- ^':>•/-!* / S^S/s. •.
^-k f'/iA-i.
/
•r O. * / h\ 2 • f/iis ^ */5
..
? _<
?y
1 1
7~ 7o74 (- 7 \ h 3 4 v^
^
II
/ / ' ^ / <*i <",;w
1
1
J__j_ p ^
-LU Continued on Page
r
^
^**$L^
Signed / I )ate Signed Date

I
I
STORM WATER SAMPLE LOGBOOK
I
PROJECT: / ^ f ? S/^vun^&cr COC(s) # :
DATE (MM/DD/YY): Q/////<?5 I
SAMPLERS: J^Vy . Srgj/e /.
r
LOCATION: 7 " 5 / " - S M P - ^ I

SAMPLE ID # TIME ANALYSIS CONTAINER LOT # PRES,
I
T&PaiftS'ZJSL ;0O7
I
CJDK &7P HC.fr) 4i5<fofaS
4031010 t
4%\faQlQ
2C.ZA Merah + A/: Z»Cu fOCD mc &) \\D\03O I
iL ss <j& *>t /n 4(7<PIOO fc I
I
I
I
INSTRUMENT ID: /53T M*HX-*'3&» „- / < / 3 5 STANDARDIZED BY: "5.Cr.
I
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: S&AH&L * R 5/ . .
t
E
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER t
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. CONDUCT.CmS) ADJUSTED
GRAB 1 1001 3-3 £ LrMO o.m ) o.ioi
I
link U& Af kll35
DATE
-7* TSCTS
RDED BY: REMAND UNDERSTOOD BY:
'DATE
COMMENTS:
Samples Ufa? fjltcho tfsin* A g g ^ i ^ g 4n ^/W./ y ^ 7^/Q^, ^ -,4
//t/£fr?r^/gzf: /?%xr/y -gl/>^v — LtS^Jy - /0*j*rx. ?$^
MAP OF SAMPLING LOCATION

(N/A i f not applicable)
N
/ 1& NORTH
t 't ' *
PcPhlD -7T9
S
I./ 33&\
J
ED BY: WE UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
2
PROJECT: 1996 SkOUJhAkUT COC(s) #:

DATE (MM/DD/YY): I- II-56
SAMPLERS: _ W . ,<W/g
LOCATION: CrF-JvlP- //&
SAMPLE ID # TIME ANALYSIS CONTAINER
_/£lf &7£> /OHO /Vt 0>> •*[Q{QZO
£?£> S*?o »»>/ 6>>
(3Arr*~ta — Lr-foS^> A/3 WL;J f/" <P) 4o3'fc>(D MM03
T7*" fOfiD y*»d o>> 4(0 \OZO
-7~D£r 'OOO "*C /& •4-34(c05O 14 z S£V
-T{?C Z,S» »xt <2r) 43!<c>OiO

-PA/ fl'D - ^ (O)
(2t£A Mhtft/'\. Z" Cu IPSO »*£ (if)
~~Z1S5 J--50 ""£ &>J
1A
^J A«7 ,
,/1f
INSTRUMENT ID: ySl n)oD&c Z ^ 1

r j ^3 5 ED BY: S6r
W
5 lO-eo-ztwi*
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: UTeÛs** *=3£2
Z*c££T * &k:r o3
T);**** * 3></
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. pH CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 tOS6 J-Q'C 7-73 VM1Z \ r>Al*5
-SKAT"?//?
*^*7 iffS
_y <\J^
DATE
RECORDED BY: DATE REATrAND^tMDERSTOOD BY:
COMMENTS:
sna-reo £> h^ nsrt>~r~y iJÂ Ak/f/;*-. HSJ,,^,. <>A#s>ples u/f?'
3
3
3
lutemez - /sV^r-/^ £l<„,y - UJ?AJ~J - /W//. 3-&' ^

NORTH
RECORDED"BY: DATE RE ERSTOOD B Y : DATE

PROJECT: &*& gôuz^H COC(s) #:

DATE (MM/DD/YY): pi / nlQS
SAMPLERS: J^v S*-** 6-
LOCATION: T^r- Mf>- //o2
SAMPLE ID # TIME ANALYSIS CONTAINER LOT # PRES.
e
-rsPo)u iB-i/^ llo$ /$/#*/.»+£-, #~c
H-A/&J
i -r&£
2C£A -M6Z*/i
Ox.
MU&i
INSTRUMENT ID: VST /Ttoon. -&5eo _. / cfS ^ STANDARDIZED BY: £^

QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS
&AI.U+ * Btrtn
~~&(f*r *'3i5
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. pH CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 H:o6 - Q.o^'c 7.55 ^7./2? / DJZ7
JSMBLZ-Af*
ORDED BY: DATE fcEAS'AND UND D BY:

COMMENTS:
&Z2. CUO.S
&$>'*+ A "TXpfh'r- 4-o foiled S V* ?>£•

2 >^7 tO-J-rr-,- •»•/ l ^ V f c 5 "
/- i 7 . y i
d/<-t& 7^C />. /ZJ y ^ ^$vi v>3-ittJ
UkYs**#&? - ^ x *^ _ ^ Us;~.ely - ' <?t*»s 4 / I M / , 5 ^ '^

\L /\Ue_g**L
7T0 *S%*c
NORTH
KJOHA.
jj£>.
%
,W
l
/ / «V
V J
v
\
f&1>*/
RECORDED BY: DATE UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
6
PROJECT: t <=)<=} 5 S^cta^-eH- COC(s) #:

DATE (MM/DD/YY): /7) jll ^ ^
SAMPLERS: J ^ . S ^ J - g ^r
LOCATION: SMC - MP - //£ ÂS^
f>MLo)MS-lti£r U&? Bcro (OCO +*c &i 4-10 lOZO <4*c

Ctfl> ^»Or*t_ &\ 4i5<iobo H 5o^
s
V /:/*, fi>> 4039otO MAS**

TTQ>t • /am **L &S 41OIOZ0 HcSf*
77>Cr /0UD **.«. fa 434(0050 M, ^ v
-PJL fm tne. fc> 43<fix>3o Re SDuf
TjTAf P Sic »k( fr> 4i5&bo h4± S0«
Cu /ODDJXI (» Aioiozrs H*f6r
fr**IBS ^£i> *. to AHZico <4'e
——^?7
i/tt/'ff
INSTRUMENT ID: VST. /Mooet. Z<Sco A ¥3 5 [ZED BY: S£r

t f
5 <5S>-6£> zv1*sr
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: 8*4te* *~ 39*
R**> £*•/•*- Ii3
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. pH CONDUCT.fmS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 JiS7 J.3 y* uw i u-h&z
GRAB 2
COMMENTS:
/yjSAX f^/ym/O^ lAJifSe f*/As£./<e/ £rp>-«. 4-£* > As/•<.{ 7>',J?£: {sSiu^ ^
JC> /;+rs- 'S^cJL&r: ~7t-£ ^n-^pl&J) Shrj.frr-r* f L~>AS 9£e-* pauêA /Vv/n
7
Jj.4 £r#*»/9J* ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ . TZ ^ &*<> <£>//•<!•£/*</ Z^Vg-cT^L, A . , 4 +£<£ Sfru.^
^K^|//^, ~rX-* /-T^m J2*-T* s3-7~ ^S/^CATX *S*5 V y ^ / . y4y-S
0*r /n/xi.
Utttfei - SutfHy . A7/Vi^ — le^y. Agp** 3 7 V

(N/A if not applicable)
IS
NORTH
*^5*
/ Zki
DATE
7^
REAT/AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
8
PROJECT: /ff5" S*r0i^sy>-£/7- COC(s) #:

DATE (MM/DD/YY): 0///1 /**
SAMPLERS: JA» S ^ ^ Cr
LOCATION: £M£-M/*-//£ fern^t )
$M£ont<&-//3.c lZ.it gbp /O00 f*L CP> 41OI0L0 </2r

l£>ft <vs fouo ^ S ) M
£> ÂsrSi sQ/3. */ /;Jr^ &) 4l>3<fD)0 }4A./43
-7~£>/ /ooo »>t <p) ^/OIOZJO U*S0*

T7?// /QfiO Hi I &> <43<ll,£>30 U,SOr
TbT/i./ P 4l5fQtaO H,S£>t
4lO\DZO HA-ro*
t 4llZloD Q'C
INSTRUMENT ID: /ST J9U4 -ZSOtf . / ^ 3 5 ED BY: SO

QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS:
'ZurU-f* Zcrip
zrx W*+- UO 5"
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. _BiL CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 (lit. (.1
GRAB 2
s^y^~7- ~Z^~ • ^X^vA Y\\*6

IORTJED BY: DATE UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
COMMENTS:
«Wl?i>/•£ u/*3 Cglf^c4i=r> rh*~. 4J~-<z. t / q ^ ; ^ / M . 4£-g ;flP«gf.
*SA-tm.gl& /C» i++\a/\ f*S. r-/cx*? For -/-£<3 /OCA-SI*** u?cts v\vj- -j-Aj&v -becu.

€l
NORTH
OhJ
RDED BY:
if* fa REAtrAND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
DATE
10
1

i
PROJECT: /7f5" SW>U>YH*I+' COC(s) #:
DATE (MM/DD/YY): 01 /// /9$ i
SAMPLERS: _ W t Q±£*e G~
LOCATION: CPP-MP-J//
E
SAMPLE ID # TIME ANALYSIS CONTAINER LOT PRES.
I
UP011/<&-<?// l%?7 /fef26-iM-.Zi/cu MUD ate. 00 ^\OLOZO /Afe
i >/l/s/Art £bo /rtc fc) 4I5<T£>5O V^ I
$ -
23? <»L &
+nzwo. S£tL
Mo* I
<25Q Are. &) 4H2JDO i/'C
ir
(POO r*t- &) i
</ -TPI+ /OffO AC (&>
i
I
E
INSTRUMENT I D : /S/ /77bprf< 3Sbo , /,<f3S STANDARDIZED BY: SO
I
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: Bea-le*-*- ~& &7
i
~Oi ^r-r;
~B**ct* / **• -
TD
gt^Tg?
4
t
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP.

-3A-J _BH_ CONDUCT.CmS) ADJUSTED t
GRAB 1 1307 1M?
J
RECOWETTBY DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
11
COMMENTS:
xtr~ /.ZgyZZCZ £f=M ; #T ~££c /ZJ- C a J-.^LA^* is-* ' V >^-<
OlAf*L-ryC+/- — ^ 5 ^> ^
£:
^•>4 —_ / • «i v i
5*- 4^ '/ay. V^ ° / r

NORTH
£ 4s*»îE
u
DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
12
•ROJECT: /9f5 .<r/?0^/r7-*i^- COC(s) #:

)ATE (MM/DD/YY): 0///'/gf
SAMPLERS: SJA^ ^-/ft
f &
O
. CATION: &//#£ - M/*~ Z//
SAMPLE ID # TIME ANALYSIS CONTAINER LOT % PRES.
T.,//£: 7?
M
[NSTRUMENT IDY STANDARDIZED BY:
JUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS^
:
IELD DATA TIME TEMP. pH CONDUCTrf-mS) ADJUSTED
GRAB 1
GRAB 2
DATE 13 READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE

COMMENTS:
/Ut
O ^\
^ ^ "EH

(N/A i f not a p p l i c a b l e )
NORTH
/////£* J/jgAiS
ED BY: DA DATE
14
PROJECT: 1915 SnovJ mgf-f COC(s) # :

DATE (MM/DD/YY): ot In \Q5
SAMPLERS: J4* . *5-M* &
LOCATION: gWM{[-MP-//z.

\
fo/iAmni£-i/z /flg? >*i <E9 •^•(OlOZQ JdMVi

TD5 2So mc 6*) *tlZJ.Ot> -t'C
ZOO ML, (f) 3l55obg_ #?<&*
flA. f/ I£L 403^/0 t/rffi*
*HS90i>0 4 C
<Zoo ±2.
//r.&S
M^<?«
TDb fotfptecCcz) u, Sdv
TZ>£ Vr.SD*
I
-NIJ^L
WrT
INSTRUMENT I D : YS3Z Mod*./ 3&o J- IM^3 STANDARDIZED BY: SCr

QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: 3&it>fr ^ l/Z-
g
^Pt^cbe-f 'fao At*~kxr)
ZZXWw /*£
"SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. _£H_ CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB I „, LM5 /•/ 'C
-GRAB 2 fijA
*JZaA^l^nu&k 1'IQ'fS
15
COMMENTS:
Ujif<a--r-*-££- — 6TI<*»^y /^7.'K. <^r /^*^Q A***-* <-/<;'£?

NORTH
;EClM
RECORDED BY: DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
16
PROJECT: /7G& Srt0«? s*7ir/¥- COC(s) #: £3^1

DATE (MM/DD/YY): /7/ ////zf 3x9,Sl
SAMPLERS: Ûu g^w ^
LOCATION: j ~
% ^ / * - Af/> ~ 3 / g
gU/M8l(l<i*;-3& /f/0? CO I) Soo PHC M.

</C,A>, fr>)
T7?Cr mm *ic (£> 434frg>3g> /J?_Sa*
&2A Afaafr + Alt. Z, 4/0IQZO tfA/fii
4JL
£0*- d-
INSTRUMENT I D : ^ S j T Mo6e( S'Sbo _ /. ^ 3 5 STANDARDIZED BY: SLr_
<
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: &-,a/>r ^ A///?
^Jui* dpr-iz
«ZPvZQ£LL
Bl_
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. CONDUCT.fmSl ADJUSTED ^ [

GRAB 1 14 *C
-/fi-7^
RECORi DATE -j 7 READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
COMMENTS:
UJgM ~f"/9-f?^
Qfto^^lr^j^x 4» <^£<0 <&*•£ 0/?e*i,'**-? CAppror S<7 &*+-* upS±K>A»>-}
f
(j(7i?A'U-ef - St4tt*iy , fjj:»ab — /-fty? s4 ^y *~f& * fc
n
NORTH
bb<*C
6***^
1
Cut** *
&** -X - X— X *
CukM-
%/,/c^
#
/'/fe> "f^^TT^S^fe^ Mf-9S
\7 DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
18
PROJECT: /9^S SA/Oa/M£LT COC(s) # :

DATE (MM/DD/YY) 0i/n(1f
?I//I
SAMPLERS: J £ &V £ Cr.
LOCATION: MP-/&
!
Cftouz &-//z. Ml T~d<r foco H*L 63 4346Q/Q
TOC £<5° rrU. <fe> 43)&QID
-TPft /ODO UK. &>
Cu,"
&£A MerAtc, 2A/ /CCO IHH- <?) 4(01020
MBAS &x> y»L ft) AlC
-res £5o «IC <?> 4H Z.LOO «rc
Afe> -&>
•ty*\ntA tflU&s. (f) fJA/Oi
. \A*
*
"'*"*•*..
U^S ^***"'S^
INSTRUMENT ID: STANDARDIZED BY: 36-

QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: QGctzQ* & ^fr
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. _j>H_ CONDUCT.fmS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 0M?X \ DM5Z
tfjfflttB-2 AM
1*
i-IS-IS
^ #
19 READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE i
COMMENTS:
vOAS {2{/*ASZT> Pro** ±L* fjulwrf. li^. faf'M ?<S IQCA+ED AT- -*L
*Au*Aro*y nf LAAI,<J** c,~ A At/4en*A fas,* &AO. ~rl>* /I«CS,~J UMS
forced /'K-fe 4i-t rD^-i-tfi+tr loM&sf A 4f6«zf** defrcf . p/ou> COA*5
\Je*Tfi££ - /%u/«. Tana - A /SAMPLE

STORM WATER & ) r -LOGBOOK
3<>° f
IS
NORTH
/
x
/
RECORDED BY IAD AND UNDERSTOOD BY:

READ DATE
20
PROJECT: /995 SkfOUJ/yvH-t COC(s) #:

DATE (MM/DD/YY): Pi /'/2.J9&
SAMPLERS: ^>Af , S±*v* Lr.
LOCATION: C?A - HIP- 3/3-
SAMPLE ID # TIME ANALYSIS CONTAINER LOT # PRES,
CFAouzie-jla /tftz, /% MA
AU -&*& Ate VT.k*. (?) 4o39o/0 HMD:
<25Q/»c (& 43lCrOlO tfzS&-l
I rss &So Mt. ffO <*tnzioo 4Z
± v f2CeAMB7*f4 * % ? / ' d
/OOP c ^
W 4/O/g^ RMt>\
Co^c-
INSTRUMENT I D : \fS) M0D6L 3-530 ~ /.c/3/ STANDARDIZED BY: s&
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS BgAlfeg ^ ^ ^
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP, pH CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 OM°C 7-QQ 0-4JU 1 OMU
V8RAB-2 A/#
:
- "RECORDEd BY: DATE RE'AD AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
21
COMMENTS:
*'€
+$&£* £alU± S*t«J*5. WTfir ISA'S piA<*p*J c/irfcfL Art* 4Lt
V)&aTfoZ - C/o^tJc/ - T2*np bppaz. £5 °£


u,
NORTH
î
ClL RECORDED BY:

It/fa?
'DATE
y(^ yy).^ni±^
v
READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
22
IGECT: ?WMC SPA ^ y v . J r ? COC(s) #: 22.4,1

E (MM/DD/YY): zkj^î
IPLERS: 'O.L iÛ^f^-i^
IATION: ?_U?UC '*+£* Vl
iAMPLE ID TIME ANALYSIS CONTAINER LOT # PRES.
MOlofere-2/t # V < W ^ 5*>oW HD#? HMGj

£*yP 5eoi*»t Hftpg- HT.SO^
5«»m\ Hope L-Z3^To2^? H»So*

)e©o«,t HlPg £ Hlotolo ikS&f
|be>ov«v( *t>Pt /4 3Za>sy? __jkM.
.U,^H,1> <^V
\Xoo%A fc^Pfe. ^ff^fr^gV ^tiD,
CT, \ *V 4r<-fc<^ ItCxJ fc.\ 4wW«)l**t rf»So*
OvokUN^ ^ &whecta w»4ry W«*>iu^ <s^Vi Mtfo3WP Hti&
- f l * 25d»v4 HDfjS i£L
Mo A 3-.fOml 4WLW* ^ s 3oî>oZZ r^
V Or.^ * * X e, Ce^y >o»y\ 26"D*1 *~w£» 4^
TRUMENT ID: Mft STANDARDIZED BY: tOk
LITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: Salter # B-A
PLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER
LD DATA TIME TEMP PH. CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

AB 1 //gr Qf-ZJ^
AB 2
]
MLCûk^fij
RECORDED BY/ )ATE 2 3 READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY:
COMMENTS:
/cevo
SAMPLE LOGBOOK
IPLING LOCATION
•t applicable)
a
NORTH
RECORDED/BY: DATE "UNDERSTOOD 'BY
24
'ROJECT: COC(s) # : ZAbb

)ATE (MM/DD/YY):
SAMPLERS: , W S -hCS-C
LOCATION: (Z\A/MC- MP-<3/'/
tmCD203&£lf lS5<0 VOA C3) Ho M>- & <* Cm
T0C 14,•6Qy
-TVS ISO ML, (P^ -EL
C 4IP 102 O UMO*
Miinjir* AMMQ»J*- Sbo *<- SP) L q%$<iObo (-h**1
gpy GOD ML (P) L VlSroCeO (M.S0»
M6 CTym<x>^*.<L\ 6oo M<. cpy fito«e
NlD«
TXAf /0O6 ML G>b IttSOi
TOG- 1000 ML (Cr) tkso,
i GAM** Spec., /UÂ Spar, HtUQi
INSTRUMENT ID: YsT rto&st. £5# STANDARDIZED BY: ^&7
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: /£»*,*/ r *3>5 ^:gptfg - ^ 3 \ ^
&*Jcrf * "SSD Q\
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. J>H_ CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 0-P- C g./«P7 / £rrzrrtf./Z6
-SRAB=£*i£
DATE DATE
25
COMMENTS:
JZ
'1 id. WATTS' A*?S /+//<,<Â'«•/ *-r -*£>
_J2L;^ UZ*• o r <*o-Q^Cy ^W^v-5- v4^g. /?c*/*"r-^ -A> *4& <2* =^2_
' / ^ /~<>rS S7'*r- <^*A ~**i.t~e f/ Qfc< <a~sJ <^»a-t.
^ ^
P-
lktAri+< IdJOL 6S&YM

9- "7++j* =• Styf r*f <S8T j*r^
*=£.
a
NORTH
3/A//3S
~ "^fftCUKHtlKBV: DATE REAt AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
26
I
I
i
PROJECT: / '442 'S)0t*J /n*.v COC(s) # :
DATE (MM/DD/YY): r3-3~ ?5 i
SAMPLERS: , J ^ ; ,<7**<-
LOCATION: zJT&PP'Mi*- / / /
i
i
LZ3Ltoze>
Al'A*te .AS xfiMc Ac'J Uz3\s\*ozo l-k SOw E
/COO ML CO-) ft 'V/gSOlO fk SO*/
\ Co* Soo M C 6") CZ32.102O
laTAf feAvftu*. tfjJdTMr*** fdtO ML &> d3333<23Q
TXA/ fpoo ML no //zSOV E
/ODD ML P) fWSZOHO {1*10%
3QT>
6AHM* Stet. M*& Af&
IQbO ML (?)
f
(3)ciQ _ fe) %?z7goep
Ml
I
I
I
INSTRUMENT ID: yS3T /tfo&&i. 3&Q STANDARDIZED BY: •J¥-
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: *g2*rUT Sb

*"" & £ 'Seeker «*" 3 - 3 S
I
/*/?
3)3 i
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER I
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. CONDUCT.fmS ADJUSTED E
GRAB 1 d-ZM -7-S3
\**6RAB I' M>*<r I
rtQ 7
RECORDED BY: ^'—^—

Z/sfcs
DATE RSTOOD BY: DATE I
COMMENTS:
?•*-> £/"/*. <^m*/B5 UW S<?//r&/*2> £,<•/„ e!L
'•W
<T
C/>'r*t. //£. /VT»^ l£<+e ^T^-yjA^. . / v ^ t ^ ts~"4S ^ T / y r ^ ^ >-S3*^>f£
/3 IJ&US tîrle - 6.^0 C.trt
[AteUhis Slt^y .C£*f- t&**p ~ Appw. ^s'/^

Z_S
NORTH
\
k
"fi*
V
\ er<
lo ^
ra^—. —
?t**h \
z~b Its
28
PROJECT: ltf*7~' Sr\Q<o /H*/J- COC(s) #: ,2\*S

DATE (MM/DD/YY)
SAMPLERS: _ jw, , S&>
LOCATION: Par-
°"^ as-' //a
'
?8f02Q3fS-lJ2. / 7 3 S fl3& M £ T * / S -*£« /ft 2A/

r rap ^ tfn>fc /&?0*
M 4ZS<&Zo #A/J*
TS5 ¥t
N/ !D<L 2<5Q ML /W^S /7s 34./
INSTRUMENT ID: ) & " Afopa. &&p STANDARDIZED BY: <, f A ^
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: 2 L & / ** c?7/

gfab^^ «* S * 5
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. DH CONDUCT.CmS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 i735 6J&
GRAB 2
• * — ? \il SsflL.
29
COMMENTS:
S-tC' / L
r?tX<3 AT riv<. -t-fr»€ &(• ^P^/JJ'M^ g Car T£-~J-far /& &>*4- S-!-nU>+* i ^ 5 l -'iCl ~L.-S>
0»»*/>5
r*~d H.-e C-C*****? r*sA*> A-f- /S /«JtA*s o^'de io d &*
W/?4r#£g £Û~~^. t*J*3S*> — 'TS'W? =• /X/7-aror J/0 "II.

-7

€1
NORTH
Sîi ;CX^JLO
"-^MDWBYT DATE RERtrAND UNDERSTOOD BY DATE
30
PROJECT: /9*9S SMOJO M£LT COC(s) #: 73^*1

DATE (MM/DD/YY):
7
SAMPLERS: f. MAZriAt
LOCATION: AA/L&MP -&/£•
vrt
TSS ZZO Nc (?) CJZ3Z*io5D 4c

-ro a ZSZ> ML (Od ZSUCfOZO IhSfr
-7-PH iQOO ML. (£r> Pi3ZZ<±0\0 >USo*
TZ>Cr IOOO Mi. (Q-) HsSfr.
fODHtL 69 fiNOi
SHO ML (Pb HW?
J M3 £<lfAt As SiC-w^- AQ<? ZEOMC CO- qZhZ.fLto'So H*c
INSTRUMENT I D : VSX- fl\o&£L 3SDO STANDARDIZED BY: 4^

QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: "heater ** 225
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 lfr/3 6.1 o.tzt ) o.fzo
RECDRDElJ B~Y DATE 00D BY: DATE

COMMENTS:
£)u».J lb P>& /AJCo+«/)/-eJiz . R.CZA M^S-J? 4IJ TOO VU<, Dv^ U<j
t P/2>t*t
CDC. P& Ar»A ZAT> AA/A\US& k^fj 4o ht. Ap.\t\*.J HKOA* C£)r.
e r
uft PerQr^-tJ pH C ^ £ ;*iA!>AnA) ZAP AATAIWSS Mlilfrg <a»^-l H»
fit AfPcD CoC \JO\\\ b<g f\\\-tJ flu*} uat'H* 4-£-g faftetrr /\ t^)3
MA

\ (N/A if not applicable)
€1
NORTH
_ _ _ _ ^ 2/3/95
_ ____ ^W*!/W^-
. 3.-^6
RECORDED BY: ' ' DATE
DATE READ
READ AND
AND UNDERSTOOD
UNDERSTOOD BY:
BY: DATE
32
I
PROJECT: 1995 S W M UArez COC(s) # : a x®8
DATE (MM/DD/YY):
SAMPLERS: J Ay
03/(0195
Stet* G.
I
LOCATION: J5M5- SMC-Mf-lIZ
I
SAMPLE ID TIME ANALYSIS CONTAINER LOT # PRES.
I
SMLm\D<i5-\\lGr .]_(!$? do o I Dm ML (f) 1llDlDZD 4'c
COO GCO ML (?) 4l5<iO&D ft* SO. I
(rAHMA <sp*t. fciQ¥>h(i Hi: her fpl M MONOID Hfc/g'i
TKM (Mb Ml /P) Ht'SO, X
-rotr (QCO Ml (Or) Hz S^y
TPH
WCQ M( (?) H«.fo4
TS5 ISO M, fP) 4JL
>k _JsL TfrrA/ Phosphorous 6bn MI (?) mszo2p flippy
INSTRUMENT I D : ]/S/ ^ZZOSSVft, STANDARDIZED BY: Jay

C SEE v s r CAua. 8tf p. 2?)
v
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: trout
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER SAf
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. _EiL CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

g
GRAB 1 4.y c 7.11 AfHjL AV^>
DATE
dMflt
READ AND
WD 0
s4^^4
UNDERSTOOD BY:
*/><>/#
DATE
33
COMMENTS:
1?A'iu fMl nCfuft.2 Over Ni?It- A*c? )'r>£o 4^-e Morni*f - \d#r££ Lo*S A/orgO 4-n RA
&M/v/nf AT A IO*Q Volume ^jnofu U*-e disd**irf£ Pipe. iJfir&Z UA-J SUA-eJ "b Pong
* •
IN 4Le rrle^^'h^ b*si>j. j~-h U/AS deceiAtA 4ka4- CjrA& Simple* uocuiA b-r.
S>fynple fonlnuvr-eirz . P-ele) MêtSurm-e^^ loer-fi Collected Afso y £rt>»* 44.*

-P&r-deei ¥
U)*{er. # y 44-e tint SAt^plin^ u)*S fiTrnpUieJ, 4-l-t disrl**•**.
>M->Tf Psv^
*UL< p\pr 'U*(\ &AA<£/. P(M> th<e,Ur haJ faee* ensUlUJ 41* HAH (=><;co
-hL-e iufh***l:o« IA/IK rlat^ io^J^J 4a It* *W* T/*KS**V GU.H. R&J is>+% AV
/ 3 /.vW-r per Mr, \J-€ATti&S. - foo\ ^CJ-OL+JL^ <CA-£*~ . /£»*f9 - <S&*A:.

a
NORTH
OhS
S&* dr*^^
&
9A^
RECORD ED^YT DATE READ'AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
34
PROJECT: COC(s) #: 2.^1L

DATE (MM/DD/YY): 03//)/9S"
SAMPLERS: T TftH/Vi5nn ; S.ÂfiQ/lfl
LOCATION: RtOMP.- MP- 2/l /£^J
ffWWOSlftffv^feJll] Tofc I cc<3 mi fz-^ 1432240/6 Ua^D^

TXM /COO ml^DP£) CA\O\Q20 )4ASCH
TQC, 250mL {&) Z 3111020 KaSOf
5 c o m l ^krvPe) 4IS906O 4°c
Cos Sooml/k^Pe) 4l59oko MaSo4
/OOP ml^HOPg) 0.4101020 HNO^

TI,Sh
On j Tcrffvi lOOOmlYHbPg) <L4lo/o3Q AJcLOfrf
r
:cc
MHftOfefi^ A S ™ ^ fk^r*L/ftftPgS 4lS9QfeO HaSOf
14CL
t
INSTRUMENT I D : N ^ T q g £ 0 B & 9 4 f r STANDARDIZED BY: T ! Tf-miSpn

t
BEAKET^ B32. filK*ETYp)^*BKTOfc
EuAiMEL* C~ft^ I
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER S A P I
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. CONDUCT.fmS) ADJUSTED
GRAB 1 LLLL 7-fcJ Q-/04 O./03
GRAB 2
^Th >&y>u=bL
35
COMMENTS:
ti, yt/i: ~/;^,yf -A/* Sjo^dfrs î^f'-^-^. <S&**'*Se£*z PLAT^T SÛtiee/ ^^s^».
^lO^'A'
Ufyine'tht'r^ . ~7A*r Lrfrt rTj&*~>s>Jf 4t^*S SZ>/6e.&-S' g ^ / &f y^r tô^r- /.
bs&r^. <"*- <S 6ss*dp . /&s?s***~?*?//' j£jpt-?s*. /M»S S?:MS^
C*A'M 7>3~ f~/J)A>•«- >OT- vVZ; STsAr f3r,JS -A St?£+*.:*-. y£ SS/i Fas- ~h<rf*H A
Ml'Ki. hMiPAj Pinal feft-fg.' 4 . / B 3 LPB\ (LUtoiLA+iUE TrTT\ir>UruP- - ^^fU9o U4ers
HV& v (>--7 r S T Q R H W A T £ R S A M p L E |_ 0 G B 0 0 K

a
NORTH
J 4?
&(&
IS *t~3o~<&'
i&m®£)-%f'. DATE
36
PROJECT: \^S ^TPg^WA-fgT? COC(s) #: aa^f

<33o;2.
DATE (MM/DD/YY): 03 //I fog"
SAMPLERS: T . HftUMgnrV S.ÂfeG/ft
LOCATION: RlOM0.^H^^2./l (^P-Z/l)
RWMC/>tS»^-2/i<» \\2t> C o S 4l5<?0k0 VUS04

^n, TOTRL C4IQIP30 jvkoiL
4 L i t e fa, b i g HMfr
39,<to- ALPHA SPEC
H-3' L-l24\12lQO fôoe
MAene<,hiM. i>>is. 5onmLtoP£S Mone.
VUSOA
RCRft nr>ETftls+OLil. loop ml ( W ^ <!Aio\020 HMO?,
)
2SO m L f f e * ) Z3Mb02O _Ha£Q<3_
jas. AX.
TKK/ 10CCnr>L^HDP& y
CAlO \O20
RinMf o ^ n q g - y g . U20 vo& .84)230/0
NJ03 f TOP fttoKltt) fch^Pml ( o ) &4|2<?C>I0
INSTRUMENT ID: \ p i <«E63ft?4fc STANDARDIZED BY: X . JC^MSOD
BuflKgr^ 6 f t
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER S A P
FIELD OATA TIME TEMP. CONDUCT.fmS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 If.5- 7-80 a-aq> a of 7
GRAB 2
^Mfe
fetes yJr^J^
AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
DATE 37
COMMENTS:
R 6 0 M C 0 3 / / 4 5 - 3-/c VoA S A M P l S U?AS Cot {&J&b AS A G r f t f l B . ALL bTner.
hfleATH&e U/A< Cotrl u/tsr a* J Uf;»rL. £3nu> U3AS: loQ3.\S L P M . T2>TAl P7aiD
IÂ/ha/iiS Ui&fe •S&Af-r TO IA/*ST2» £#3 ja~d #73^ /L#2 VJ<A •&£>& & r

a
NORTH
JAY
sfe
u
3kl3L READ'AND UNDERSTOOD BY:
38
DATE
PROJECT: R 9 5 SnfrPMWATEg COC(s) #: 2Z92L

DATE (MM/DD/YY): O'iljlj^S
SAMPLERS: Z l T0HM5OrV S.ftARdlft
LOCATION: RtOMP.fl?,? 195 ~ 3l2. (_MP~3/z)
p\juu<*Agoi<«-3/y U f o COD VU5fi<}

C-TAMMA -5PEC
3 4 Li-tee Cuble.
)060mLlfrfrPs)
M40^^0ID
0A)O\D2O
I4IQ03
HO03
Tor?
3 ]Qnr> m L f P a l H3224010 HaSO<»
aSomL^tiDP^ Wl4l72lQQ 4»c
INSTRUMENT ID: £YSI^ ^ZE03>&ÂL STANDARDIZED BY: T . "3>\MSOn
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: RlJflfteT * ftl^r - (TJ
RiMME?**-- 5 1 9
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER fSAP
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP, _fitL CONDUCT.fmS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 IMP 4.4
GRAB 2
DATE 3 9 READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE

COMMENTS:
P / O I O - Ifr Li-kZ?^ - S'.'iS S£&>UbS* S A ^ p ) ^ S U7t*/"g fotteclek iv\ko A
K*ckt+. TKft pfoup UJA? A150 •beTfcgNwg^j tis/*^ A- ~&ucti.T. The \',au\X
iJAS 4/An-SfKg^ +0 -H-g €-A-t^pl£. t8grrL£5 r ^ o ^ 4t~g Bu^lter. " T t ^ ~TZ?£r
p/ocO JT / & 3 . S & / / / r t - * ££2 A/f/«.
V STORM WATER SAMPLE LOGBOOK
n
^ \ ^ MAP OF SAMPLING LOCATION
^ \ (N/A i f not applicable)
NORTH
-
\
\
\
\
\
\\
\
\
\
\
L
<<^LJ^ "'TCEUUWJfcD B Y : *'» IfDAT READ AND UNDERSTOOD B Y : I)ATE
40
PROJECT: 19^5~ ^ T D g M N A y A i - g g COC(s) #: 2^7/

DATE (MM/DD/YY): 3 //J / f S
SAMPLERS: T. TflHKKoM * S. ^ A P C i S
LOCATION: RtPMP.-MP-t/g
SAMPLE ID # TIME ANALYSIS CONTAINER LOT # PRE5.
ffu)Mfl/înyrt/9 »S7> Cafr Ha5<0<t

C n . ToTRL I OOOml (HSFE) £410/020
Hz So*
ffCLRfl METftLSi-fitf,-) lOOOmL/Hnpg) £ ^ 0 / 0 2 0 ^M0 3
Mi ZnjM/j
; S
To<b looomL f Q H32240I6 H-3-S04
TOC 2SomL^) Z5M(cQgo
TDS g5rtmL/fiopg) ^J2mi2\0O
TXM i o o o m i m c ^ g ) C410I03D
INSTRUMENT I D : 6t?SX)q2.g03g&-4k STANDARDIZED BY: T. T n H O S o n
PuKJAJgl- -Enr
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER - S A P

GRAB 1 II SO 4.1 C
0.333 tf.3 3/
GRAB 2 JNL/B
COMMENTS:
FtniO A-V THE T?i/E QF ^ A M P L / M f a a>VS 5 F £ £ T /M 9,S9> 5ErÂ/ft5.
STREAM \A/A<> Jg4"\A7fbgT AUK ft" n E r P , P L f i ^ - J . ^ g C S
- • » J
y, . ? .
*&
fjjgfl? <^»/ ^ ]</*S/TM **+/ A7Z. ^ 3 /S7# /2-7> /^xr Qyy X^fe.
4-
a
NORTH
h--8"
s fc
L &'
(j - \//? » <»•
3k*
LZZT3 Vs"
6) - ^
1
; 2-
0 - d - o l ^
42
'ROJECT: \QQ5 STORMWA1E1? COC(s) #: 339^

)ATE (MM/DO/YY): 3 /// / f f S "
SAMPLERS: T . t r ^ H M ^ f ^ S.frAftOifl
.OCATION: ldPP-M-P-2/f
SAMPLE ID TIME ANALYSIS CONTAINER LOT # PRES.
ICPP03/f^-3/i l3os SAUNiTy 25QmlADPg) 1/24172100 4'c

» Sft£d ) grvr^s, 1 4Li*ER Ctt$ie M^lQ3Qo)0 HM05
V£L
TP*4 YlzSQo
_SdjgQ . / O C O m l AtQP£)(LM 10)030 HK03
5l5o mL/HOPiT) L /24)72)oo 4°c

Mi-Âr-te as I4MD3 X 4'c^
I£*%
INSTRUMENT ID: A f g J ) ^?F03Pft4U STANDARDIZED BY: X 35B&Snn
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: Pu.MA.HTL - L F - Q J

agftttrfe. - 2 \IL
BliGklET^ 10
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. pH CONDUCT.fmS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 1505" VI 7-47 Q.0<?5 I 0*0145
GRAB 2 Nlft
-'"RECtJRBEb BY:
• • v
DATE READ' AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
43
COMMENTS:
f
PLO(JL) AT T H E T f M E p P S A M P U A J G toac. 1 PETE. sexo/ViZX STREAM
/ f
(DAS (o" tnibE Ah)h & bEEP, /5fr^c _2 _?.*_?«/ ±P$"djr M
* _ 42—
y=V.

_
A NORTH
\
)-&/*>
Q : l//U ( i ^ ^ l ^ V ' *"0 | ^«f*5 = o . t p O c-f **.
<±4^
3l«( $5"
^/VK^-TX ' ^ ^ c g ^ ? ^-Jo IE

44
r
'ROJECT: COC(s) #: ja^r
IATE (MM/DO/YY): 3 / / / )Q*>
SAMPLERS: Tt TDHAfSnn; ^.feAgflfi
.OCATION: XCPP-MP~(/f

£
EPPOTSIKB-I/IC, i!35 _BQTL /ccOml/HnPe) 4I0102O 4« c
CoP C
MfttRi-Vg A!S KN03 2SQml^HDP£^ Llmmico
METHvl I s o b u t u l ffifjong. /3)x40n.l (G^ 8424<?o;io t
TKN
TOO
lOOOml/tibPth 4 ) 0 1 0 2 0
looomLf G") M32240IO 1
t
TOri fooOfwLfCa')
MM03
t
flu, M; J 7n £*• 4'C
TS5 2SOml/H6Pg) Ll2U\l2loO
PHosPHoEnV-lrrtftL loon ml (HEPS) 4 I 0 I 0 2 O
t
:NSTRUMENT ID: fYsx)qagM?frtti ED BY: " T.7?^KlSnn
t
[UALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: B ( IflldET ^ - £ > £ l ~ - 1 2 .
t
PtiMHiFL^- &/J
t
IAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER ^ A P
IELD DATA TIME TEMP. DH CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 (335 7.51 0.M& O-i^l
GRAB 2 NJ/ft
RETORTED BY: ' DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE

45
COMMENTS:
X>//»«JCC/ T7/r>-C 7*2 /?*// *^/e. &S&8 Pzr-l-i'tH ( &v r*>». £l*t$£.) ^Pîa
^js&r£ *&// •z=>r~^/&* L*^"-<: tT^/Zt^^k
•X* s-Sx
'''sirts?> e^j/4A "ixr:

r
7/C'S, £*s*s--e. /ysTr/te ^
^ -
l/YA /£-/•&? -~7> IsAzsyssx s7si. J5- //--5^'„ \c/s?A-rA£z. >- &4J e^-f-. <£*>-./

Q
NORTH
\
\
\\ ^*«/
\
JI** \
\.
^DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: . DATE
46
PROJECT: WQ5 -STP£MUyAtgTg COC(s) #: 33^7

DATE (MM/DD/YY):
SAMPLERS:
3//>/<9S~
X J D ^ / V i ^ A / ; S.AAfiCJft
c
LOCATION: T<>F- MP-l/2.
E
t
TSFoangs-i/z Woj A / \ M M A <PEC
&Rnss * / B i
1 4 u-te Câig Maovfoio HMo*
t
da.N// Zn
J 5 t
roe?
?k.
roc
ALKALiMATV 2.f^ml/mfd ^JQ4m too hlovi&'c)
t
t
£
INSTRUMENT I D : (\l<&) q3.Efog9*& STANDARDIZED BY: ^ . SEMOSSi^
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: SuodEr**- Bgr-Q3

t
ftEflttepdU 3â
•MPPEg--*-lMfe t
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER S A P t
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP.
7.^7
DH CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED t;
GRAB 1 *3'£ fr3// I I). 309
GRAB 2 I
2:^
'RECORDED BY: DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
47
COMMENTS:
p)nm AT T)U£ OP SAMVUKih ~ 4/./-teas Ikl A S S ^ * ; f t s • .- ABCLJHC*.
77"
a
NORTH
Ar'f
s}^
\
\
3-f/-t5
48
STORM MATER SAMPLE LOGBOOK
PROJECT: t q q s * STPftM toAtS-E COC(s) #: 2a?y

DATE (MM/DD/YY): 3 / / > )<JS"
SAMPLERS: X 3 b r t M < g P i ' S.GAEOJF?
LOCATION: ^MC.-MP'l/l /^6*g)
SMQ.(raH<yv-l/26 M 2 ^ _ . ^ Q ^ IOOO m I/HOPE; 410)0,30 4°C

toD Soo/nL/tt&PE) 415904,0 (4aSo4
4 L'.te QnhU MMoyfoto !Vk303
TKM ICCO ^ L ( H E P ^ 4?o;n3.0 Ha-SQtf
TDGr l (&) H3334010
TPH
foCOirwUWg) 41010^0 Hr^Q3
( L U j Kli . Z n •1
TSS L
2Soml/fere) /24l72foO
6
^J C
n^^-T^
V^/K s^z
INSTRUMENT ID: Q2. E I ^ ^ l STANDARDIZED BY: I . XH^SOK/
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER "SAP

GRAB 1 7-*rf O.J34 A/53
GRAB 2
•"^VHX^C
49
COMMENTS:
/?f,^J ~/^L**f- 6SjirS £&//*£.•/*-/ ibis y ^ /£>sc~/j&3 ••-T£*~. ~7~77£>-.
IsZA- /^g >^V*. & s* ' 3-s/-f*f

/•^/•S^&" s*.>/(/ r . C^ê-^-Oy XZ-^ <L C+^£ /.
STIRM WATER SAMPLE LIGBMK

Z_i
NORTH
\ ^fiy
t
3\*f '-•
RECORSED BY:
u
DATE
Z?y.yk*JcbL
READ AND UNDERSTOOD B Y :
4-2o-9s
DATE
50
PROJECT: 1 3 3 5 ^TPfeMVAJA-t-gTS. coc(s) # : aa9*>_

DATE (MM/DD/YY): 3//)/9S"
,
SAMPLERS: T- 3&HU?Snn 5 f-jftPPlfl
<
LOCATION: SMC - M ? - > / g . (covped*)
^Me.oanqgH/gg. [U^5 Sot) 4°c

COD rt»*o«
GAMMA- SPg£. ~1 4U4g&0ub'ii. MUo3%?/Q >VftJ03
Gross ^ / 6 b
TXA; lOCOmL/WsJ 4)01030 tfa-SCM
TP+* i
lOCTiml/tthPs) 4)01030 HIM03
T5S
3 ^50mL(HDPE) W J 4 172 fo<3 4M.
v_ ftHOSPHoeu^-lok) Soomlftpffc) 4ir<fobo (-U-SQgf
INSTRUMENT ID: QlEO^ttAU) STANDARDIZED BY: J-CCHftSCn
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: gai/jggT* - f i g r - l g
fi£Aw?FP^ - ft 42
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. _2H_ CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 m* .21 O.ogp o.oso
GRAB 2 ^ _ _ _ _> M/R
Jllfc READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE

-RECORUSTB'Y: DATE
51
COMMENTS:
Com pn<;;4e. 5to r* f^h 5k - " ^ ^ i ^ ^£//£ " • " ^ ^S» /* -^4 £&?+<** -r, )*sy~
6—«g-S Mti:''^- s i&D
-ij /y^î'^-7 -y^

*f^
£*<#.
ifs*-
/Wf Sjte~j/*<i
0*T
^ ^ /a-jg/eP <a~-d A rr>£ **>**
<
tZJUJ. <*"£ i' ?y»w^^c ,S/J:/)/7^J ry.~A- ^kz> &*-. ~7~Z> UsKfTf*
rtr- &-,/-'?€- \AJ*+J£~> - /Z>/J \JeJ-_ IAJC^CL,

\
L^
NORTH
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
. Â7
>lv \
\
\
\
jf/fe
RECORDED BY DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD B Y : DATE
52
PROJECT: }99S ?>TD/?MwAtg^ COC(s) #: .2311

DATE (MM/DD/YY): 3 / ^_
2 ) / 95- 3*313
SAMPLERS: T. ZWAT^X/
33 n
LOCATION: "7^/=- MP-zfjL
TS?03Zl<>5-3lz IIZS -roc Z'oQ ML CCr)

$C8kyt£rah + Cu M-, r*j \ooo ML /P) hi MO,
SurFWAxJr-> &T> M<- (P)
(JOT) SCO ML (?) /4t Sc?v
J H/ T-SS ZÔ Ml (P\
i
T5Pft3ZfQ5-3h f/Z5 SUIDA £r£*/er*t XASOVJ*.*& 6AS <S. );,J 2>Ukf
rr Atff- ^£i
Q;l £ CrZ&A-se.
3y L*&
S\AIOA /Vu4-rf£M \-5 L
C~yA*/r~d£ 4-
T yy
ZSOML (p) dzfrtUco (ifOU*

6rfiHU*A 5fl*tt. $£-"10 <J i'.Wr tiP) M4039X0 MOl
v I i \f
INSTRUMENT ID: / < £ 3 Z^»5fff«ife STANDARDIZED BY: <J • -OOHM-SOKS .
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: "&*£*{•- V>KT~ l5

¥>€Ak& B-&(
tQt/A/ff- /*w
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. PH CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB l UV5 VVC
SBJIB 2 ' /J(A
A tr^^nM^,
ECORDED BYT dATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
53
COMMENTS:
\ STORM WATER SAMPLE LOGBOOK
s
"'MAP OF SAMPLING LOCATION
( \
NORTH
\
\
\
"X. \H
X
\
v.
^ j/zs/ff ^jbMÔri.ygmc&t *f-*4-?f

• .-KECUKIJED' BY: < DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
54
PROJECT: f<Mf .•^TD/M\iJAT£& COC(s) # : 23>\]_

DATE (MM/DD/YY): 3 -2.1- 9€ ^3)M
SAMPLERS: ^l A »risou 2313
0
^3/b"
LOCATION: 1^<-MP-//l.
SAMPLE• ID # TIME ANALYSIS CONTAINER LOT # PRES.
ff
•7&' &iZJtt-//z 5u/gft &t*+r»l ttJOffamX? Lfl& SuOnlieD ScMsK MA M lUBitATfi) %,
Orl l /rrrtifi I L.A3
$WQ4 M-f-i^h
Nwlri-t* +5
CyAM^t
5WDA) /7g^>W3 v/
4^5 2£o MI (?) cjzlnzio? t'c On**)
^ / T ^ A/a Se-fo 4 r, \+t (?) HNO*
&AMMA SpA . JU-Z& 222, JL 4
TT7£r mi) ML (b) jkZZtfno Uz^X
A/K^Dt/Z-L, t'c
T?f
K
\/ L_ &2A n«kA *g.tf z*/ *?<<±u&* ,m " CA\oto7JO
•
INSTRUMENT ID: \{$C °,7£n*Stf^ STANDARDIZED BY: <\ v}0tfA/5Py
ar
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: 1}*&>*r' -£}£T- Q^
ritM*\e.l ** fi&nL
vteAker * B-Vr
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. _2H_ CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 IZ4° ho'c •7.6^
DATE 5 - READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE

COMMENTS:
/'~JO y4l .^ ^7p><V> <Z ^--O^S"
t/^frf £*>/b-t/s/ / ^ ^ - SjrA *££-<> •£>u /*/}/&** Jcr7 c^/ y^c
(£>r 31//DA /^gy-o-^-'^s *2>^<: -J~* -Ad ^^ ^t.A'"*"* (ê/f. . £>/$+*/?OP

_ >6?S
^2_
is/45 - /£.£f //Ay* fe-r
^ STORM WATER SAMPLE LOGBOOK

A
NORTH
\
\
\
\
\
\
"N
^T7 J^
<-=
--^CORtJEEfBY:
1-
- sink?
DAfE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY:
</-
DATE
56
PROJECT: R q 5 ^r\Q^mnUUft4<g. COC(s) #: <£338l?A7<r

DATE (MM/DO/YY): S'3-%5
SAMPLERS: ^ . ^ftRpjfl
LOCATION: TjZC.fiPQ5Q395 - \I\C~7 fftfrfl)
T f PPPSafflft, c£vo fioQ [OCO y n / fP) ÎQICÔ vL

CQH
a
TKAJ looomi {9f moloxo HJZSOM
>5oOrn i fP) ism* HJ59^
Tot
TfH looo ml f£) LI3HC03O
folgft m4 i3 4-Cu,V /ooo mi fp)
A y)olaJO
. U',*A,3fa*V .)
T3S c^3 mi CP) W
y^ "Total j^hosfhoeu^ c5oo mi CP) ±L
INSTRUMENT ID: YSZ^J £o38Wb STANDARDIZED BY: SC=>
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: T<£flort ftuftpgg -
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER *5Pr?
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. _StL CONDUCT.fmS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 13)0 0». 7.^3 .mi 041
GRAB 2
5-^5 ^fY^^Sr^^L g-/*-fy

RECEDED BY: DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
57
COMMENTS:
VoftV o-yî fold. W N A ^ bf\\U/ Rou^ftVe -Q«a^.ofeW)/". ftl/fe, QfCtLy ffooEftk,?_£-
O.u^ T o T 1/g/urse - 3o7g<5 /-XT.
\ STORM WATER SAMPLE LOGBOOK

\
\ MAP OF SAMPLING LOCATION
\\
X
X
\
f>
NORTH
V
\
-
X
X %
x
X
N
X
^ > . _FH_wC- 5*5 • *5> ^0A^3^Viu^4=; 8-/6 -*t±~

53
PROJECT: W 5 cSV)dyniAJmga COC(s) #: £3&?£&sy

DATE (MM/DD/YY): ^5-3 -<\3
SAMPLERS: A &A&HA
LOCATION: ^PfPP0^03^5 - l/fC (fo*fc&t\
liePfoS&tf-lir 1333 PflPi Inmnl If) ^
Cob 6o*»\\ (ft) fog**

£5OK\ if) iA\na\ot HJS£H
M^ /0CO/nf f £ ) MiolocLO
H0'2L
q?V6o3<3
~T5S <fee.r-Nl C?) • " 4 ' T ^ M ^^L

Tbtef Ph o f f i c e s ^ Q W (p) \53%9 Hx50<J
IZPfhSoWS'l/ltfr^ l & o ftwtt^ TQcbcfy/ fcfUng f 3 ) M 0 m ( l/ifrls m&Qold ^ tL
INSTRUMENT I D : VST ^ 2 g o 3 ^ V f r STANDARDIZED BY: ^

Co WD .= l.«fiS*.scc VST CAU'8- Os^B^
7
p . 33 '
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS : T £ P / Q / r &{flPefe r T f r - a ^ , EluuCfc^ • to-A5. 6?ntefc. A - 3 k
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER ^ A P
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. DH CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 1<.3L ,Oty -OMO-
GRAB 2 M/A-
lêÂjQ^. At.
r
59
COMMENTS:
:0MMENT5:
^^fe /Q-ysr
» STORM WATER SAMPLE LOGBOOK

\ MAP OF SAMPLING LOCATION
\ (N/A if not applicable)
IX
NORTH
Si -.?.
G
>?
CV<^
••'RECORDED BY: DATE DATE
60
PROJECT: ^ 9 3 frVofcr-xWftteg- COC(s) #: OfL5

DATE (MM/DD/YY): 5~«2 '^S
SAMPLERS: C Hg^ y^gl-,',^
LOCATION: ftg&OH/H /VftffondL Lcix-Uie^T
\Qh Ooo rnf I£l K*50<i

H* G-3 <±ob_ TPH
G-( i ^ . ^ n Q a f e ^ g s s flfoj&o
\6O0r*i (Q)
M L CoJo'.
M34Co3Q Kg3Q«-l
H/{^3
rf/(/0-
^-5 M;*s Tof. 3So r* [Q 23(i(sQo 'rUiO/
^-*>u •>4> a:/j T55 £So r~\ ih. £11 IL*= Mt
hVL-l cSojOiSM %N_ ( ^ £ W , ^ S / ? W ^ A L) L c u ^ ^WQZQ BlO^
*?& «/:s ~*0£,
¥
Ûfc
3& *£/5 70C
W
^
M L ^ ' 7 RCPd frkto f d u . l . /<>«- ^ re) •d/UO-.
jd; in,3bji u
x$
{ f
tfT utr
INSTRUMENT I D : 1 6 T Qj£o3mfo STANDARDIZED BY:
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: b w ^ p g - ^? I ^ . ^ U ^ n g L - 3/o
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER SAP
FIELD DATA 5 ' ^ " ^ ^ jj^g TEMP, DH CONDUCT.fmS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 ftWLM Ij^co 10.9 .oGA . OM
GRAB 2 flA/L-£ qio 10-1 >(W 43^
•aC^CXAjC^>
61
COMMENTS:
:0MMENT5:
Pt\\ fSArÛS U)&^ Of>ttftvU<k YVi C\\&S VT\ft(cVU ftp f V & k o r w . .l)*£i'onftL
T ^ g g d NiO
- j - . '
— ~ i jj • : =
^ 5 £'/#r
^ STORM-WATER SAMPLE LOGBOOK
/ \
\
NORTH
\
\
X
\
\
s:"3-,
?5
V^N' 'QOfr ^•3-^5 ^fa^&alL %-/*-?<

62
PROJECT: \9R6 SbrmvottZ COC(s) #: _2lll

DATE (MM/DD/YY):
SAMPLERS: JnV> mcgt.'dG
LOCATION: Pfif- MP-
S"Du3A
MA- N*Z.*bZ.o3
it
MA
/MgTflop 5 3 1 - S D W 4 ~>Q ML f(x) A/A it
-M£rr*OD Gjy GO'S -SWA C3) HOmt (6-) KIA- AsterW't Ac'A
A/*
J3 Cp (OOO ml p>)
JU_ AscorUc AU
MBT/tts A/A
MA l\laZ<>203
Cx&uesjo-I SOW A- GO 6ZQ MI (P> A/X- filouL
d'l £ QzeA-sf- /goo r~< &.J MA-
/\J*.J-r;t*-r-< AJA
± Cy/t-Kt dt A/A flJaOht
INSTRUMENT ID: y S ; 9££<3 3 g W f r STANDARDIZED BY: AoV»-»«*
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: d^±&f 8K1T-/Z ~lA*ir*t\ ~ 3C&9
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER S1\P
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. PH CONDUCT.(mS) ADJUSTED

GRAB 1 1
ft !?. 0-019- 0. oio
-aftAB-Z-* A / *
4 -/Q-9C
^tEeORDtD "BYT DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
63
COMMENTS: ^

/ \
NORTH
ftECOKDHTBY: DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
64
PROJECT: /-'"?~ >?-7Zrfv/.^J-AT£-Z. COC(s) #: Z3ZsJ

DATE (MM/DD/YY): •is -"7 -**'3
SAMPLERS: -U *-S &>Si
c
•:tA &r,'<}c
LOCATION: Of A' MP- 'J*
^Dbg-ftSijz j?/zp MAfiS ^co *f if) (JzsSDô 4*C

-TS5 2$j#i r?) LkdfSLixo ifk
tfc&M&rts+&£;*'' tnp»n &) C.4io\ i.o
0 \4Uo 3
ZteL
TW (C£D#t (Cr)
TZ>& ian»t Or)
I
INSTRUMENT I D : V S - T <5$6QS&*& STANDARDIZED BY: J/>£»»*i
QUALITY CONTROLLED MATERIALS: 0&A&>/_ *~ I5r35

I
I
SAMPLE COLLECTION: SAMPLES COLLECTED PER S A P I
FIELD DATA TIME TEMP. CONDUCT.CmS) ADJUSTED I
GRAB 1 Ti.ifh I o. nh
/ I
• .. " ? ~?s-
"RECORD-ED BY: 1
DATE 65 READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: I
COMMENTS:
UAfr* £o//*cf£d dt/ecWf-t /Vlp J~Ut &ArUtpl£: £g~.4**!ue»s
I **•£ ~r /. r-rr
d*J-c£ /A4*S
con n>/nf^ o » z?
-^J// 3*.^ ASor /Zfaîr^f yCr- y^v»
?-
y>- >*-ri^ ^5>a->*yg/tf--? 6*^v<^r
~>u//nre/. /ft? /^r^J c/^-A £^t^5. si ^J-J*;**d. /I// j£?'-.'/?/*><+-•/ £/*&£> Aw-'
^
^•e ^Pztâ/t /PrTPs^ss cote's /y^'Sscf c+s/'-/£ s?^~ <£-<*> >*>y- x3i- y^£. s / f
;
/ r-^*> o ^ f y ^ " ^ >JS>?V
^ &
^ ^ 4 ^/ r^y ^ ^ - sf*s~5

IX
NORTH
A
\
\ ^r
efts'
\
\
\
s 6A/&
RECORDED 'BY DATE READ AND UNDERSTOOD BY: DATE
66
Appendix B
Volatile Compounds
B-2
Table B-1. Method 524 Compounds for Storm Water and Snowmelt
1 Chloromethane
2 Bromomethane
3 Vinyl Chloride
4 Chloroethane
5 Methylene Chloride
6 1,1 -Dichloroethene
7 1,1 -Dichloroethane
8 1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
9 Chloroform
10 1,2-Dichloroethane
11 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
12 Carbon Tetrachloride
13 Bromodichloromethane
14 1,2-Dichloropropane
15 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
16 Trichloroethene
17 Dibromochloromethane
18 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
19 Benzene
20 Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
21 2-chloroethylvinylether
22 Bromoform
23 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
24 Tetrachloroethene
25 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
26 Toluene
27 Chlorobenzene
28 Ethylbenzene
29 Xylene (total)
30 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
33 Acrolein
34 Acrylonitrile
35 Trichlorofluoromethane
B-3
Table B-2. Regulated and Unregulated DW Method 524.2 Compounds
Compound 1 Benzene
Compound 2 Vinyl Chloride
Compound 3 Carbon tetrachloride
Compound 4 1,2-Dichloroethane
Compound 5 Trichloroethylene
Compound 6 ' p-Dichlorobenzene
Compound 7 1,1-Dichloroethylene
Compound 8 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Compound 9 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Compound 10 1,2-Dichloropropane
Compound 11 Ethylbenzene
Compound 12 Monochlorobenzene
Compound 13 o-Dichlorobenzene
Compound 14 Styrene
Compound 15 Tetrachloroethylene
Compound 16 Toluene
Compound 17 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Compound 18 Xylenes (total)
Compound 19 Bromobenzene
Compound 20 Bromodichloromethane
Compound 21 Bromoform
Compound 22 Bromomethane
Compound 23 Chlorodibromomethane
Compound 24 Chloroethane
Compound 25 Chloroform
Compound 26 Chloromethane
Compound 27 o-Chlorotoluene
Compound 28 p-Chlorotoluene
Compound 29 Dibromomethane
Compound 30 m-Dichlorobenzene
Compound 31 Dichloromethane
Compound 32 1,1 -Dichloroethane
Compound 33 1,1 -Dichloropropene
Compound 35 e,z-1,3 -Dichloropropene
Compound 37 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Compound 38 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Compound 39 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Compound 40 1,2,3-Trichloropropane
B-4
Table B-2. (continued).
Compound 41 Bromochloromethane
Compound 42 n-Butylbenzene
Compound 43 Dichlorodifluoromethane
Compound 44 Fluorotrichloromethane
Compound 45 Hexachlorobutadiene
Compound 46 Isopropylbenzene
Compound 47 p-Isopropyl
Compound 48 Naphthalene
Compound 49 n-Propylbenzene
Compound 50 sec-Butylbenzene
Compound 51 tert-Butylbenzene
Compound 52 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
Compound 53 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Compound 54 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
Compound 55 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene

Master: Storm Water Monitoring Report For The 1995 Reporting Period

Cargado por

Información del documento

Título original

Derechos de autor

Formatos disponibles

Compartir este documento

Compartir o incrustar documentos

Opciones para compartir

¿Le pareció útil este documento?

¿Este contenido es inapropiado?

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Master: Storm Water Monitoring Report For The 1995 Reporting Period

Cargado por

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

INEL-95/0583

Published October 1995

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory

Prepared for the

3. CENTRAL FACILITIES AREA (CFA) 11

4. RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPLEX (RWMC) 15

5. TEST AREA NORTH (TAN) TECHNICAL SUPPORT FACILITY (TSF) 35

6. POWER BURST FACILITY (PBF) 45

7. IDAHO CHEMICAL PROCESSING PLANT (ICPP) 49

8. TEST AREA NORTH (TAN) 65

9. TEST REACTOR AREA 73

CFA Central Facility Area

DCG Derived Concentration Guidelines

ICPP Idaho Chemical Processing Plant

1pm Liters per Minute

mrem/yr Millirem per year

PBF Power Burst Facility

RCRA Resource Conservation Recovery Act

SDA Subsurface Disposal Area

TSF Technical Support Facility

USGS United States Geological Survey

1.1 Sample Analysis

Flow did not occur at the following monitoring points:

• CFA-MP-2/1 INEL Landfill #3 Extension

• TRA-MP-1/2 North Perimeter

• TRA-MP-2/2 Northeast corner.

• RWMC-MP-1/2 Operations Area

• RWMC-MP-3/2 Transuranic Storage Area

• SMC-MP-1/2 West Perimeter

• CTF-MP-1/2 Collection Basin.

G = grab sample, if a code is not present, a grab sample was taken.

B = sample collected from standing water in a collection basin.

Well = sample of storm water flowing into an injection well

DW = sample parameters included drinking water parameters.

on DUG electronic clitafor1:24,000 aerie imp* obtained from the USGS.

2.1 ANL-MP-2/2 (GRAB)

Table 2. Comparison of ANL-MP-2/2-G Data on 02/02/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 2R. ANL-MP-2/2-G radiological data from 02/02/95.

Table 3 . Comparison of ANL-MP-1/2-G Data on 05/02/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 3R. ANL-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 05/02/95.

Table 4. Comparison of ANL-MP-2/2-G Data on 05/02/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 4R. ANL-MP-2/2-G radiological data from 05/02/95.

3.1 CFA-MP-1/2 (GRAB)

Table 5. Comparison of CFA-MP-1/2-G Data on 01/12/95 to regulatory guidelines.

Table 5R. -CFA-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 01/12/95.

Table 6. Comparison of CFA-MP-3/2-G Data on 01/12/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 6R. CFA-MP-3/2-G radiological data from 01/12/95.

Table 7. Comparison of CFA-MP-1/2-G Data on 06/07/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 7R. CFA-MP-1/2-G radiological data from 06/07/95.

(7!500 — CFA DISPOSAL TYEL1

Table 8. Comparison of RWMC-MP-1/2-G Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 9. Comparison of RWMC-MP-3/2-G Data on 01/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 9R. RWMC-MP-3/2-G radiological data from 01/11/95.

Table 10. Comparison of RWMC-MP-2/1-G Data on 02/02/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 10V. Volatile organics data for RWMC-MP-2/1-G on 02/03/95.

Table 11. Comparison of RWMC-MP-2/1-G Data on 02/03/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 12. Comparison of RWMC-MP-2/1-G Data on 03/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 12R. RWMC-MP-2/1-Gradiologicaldata from 03/11/95.

Table 13. Comparison of RWMC-MP-2/1-C Data on 03/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 14. Comparison of RWMC-MP-3/2-G Data on 03/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 14R. RWMC-MP-3/2-G radiological data from 03/11/95.

Table 15. Comparison of RWMC-MP-1/2-G Data on 03/11/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.

Table 16. Comparison of RWMC-MP-2/1-G Data on 05/06/95 to Regulatory Guidelines.