Está en la página 1de 5

STATCON LEGAL MAXIMS Hoc quidem perquam durum est, sed ita lex scripta

(Chapter 4 and 5) est.


It is exceedingly hard, but so the law is written.

Chapter IV – ADHERENCE TO, OR DEPARTURE FROM,


B. DEPARTURE FROM LITERAL INTERPRETATION
LANGUAGE OF STATUTE LITERAL INTERPRETATION

Index animi sermo est. Aequitas nunquam contravenit legis.


Speech is the index of intention. Equity never acts in contravention of the law.

Animus hominis est anima scripti. Aequum et bonum est lex legume.
The intention of the party is the soul. What is good and equal is the law of laws.

Verba legis non est recedendum. Jus ars boni et aequi.


From the words of the statute there should be no departure. Law is the art of equity.

Maledicta et exposition quae corrumpit textum. Ratio legis est anima legis.
It is bad construction which corrupts the text. The reason of the law is the soul of the law.

Littera scripta manet. Littera necat spiritus vivificate.


The written word endures. The letter kills but the spirit gives life.

Clausula rebus sic stantibus. Verba intentioni, non e contra, debent inservice.
Things thus standing. Words ought to be more subservient to the intent, and not
the intent to the words.
Absoluta sentential expositore non indigent.
When the language of the law is clear, no explanation is Benignus leges interpretandae sunt, quod voluntas
required. eraum conservetur.
Laws are to be construed liberally, so that their spirit and
Dura lex sed lex. reason be preserved.
The law may be harsh but it is the law.
Qui haret in littera haret in cortice.
He who considers merely the letter of an instrument goes
but skin deep into its meaning.

1
Argumentum a simili valet in lege.
Quando verba statute sunt speciali, ratio autem An argument drawn from a similar case, or analogy,
generalia, statum generaliter est intelligendum. prevails in law.
When the words used in a statute are special, but the
purpose of the law is general, it should be read as the De similibus idem est judicium.
general expression. Concerning similars, the judgment is the same.

Cessante rationi legis, cessat ipsa lex. Ubi eadem est ratio, ibi est eadem legis disposition.
When the reason of the law ceases, the law itself ceases. Where there is the same reason, there is the same law

Interpretatio talis in ambiguis simper fienda est ut Ea est accipienda interpretation quae vitio caret.
evitetur inconveniens et absurdum. That interpretation is to be adopted which is free from evil
Where there is ambiguity, the interpretation of such that or injustice.
will avoid inconveniences and absurdity is to be adopted.
Lex injusta non est lex.
Legis construction non facit injuriam. An unjust law is not a law.
The construction of the law will not be such as to work
injury or injustice. Fiat justitia, ruat coelum .
Let right be done, though the heavens fall.
Argumentum ab inconvenient plurimum valet in lege.
An argument drawn from inconvenience is forcible in law. Nemo est supra legis.
Nobody is above the law.
Verba nihil operari melius est quam absurde.
It is better that words should have no operation at all than Nulla potential supra legis esse debet.
that they should operate absurdly. No power must be above the law.

Lex simper intendit quod convenit rationi. Jurae naturae aequum est neminem cum alterius
The law always intends that which is in accordance with detrimento et injuria fieri locupletiorem.
reason. It is certainly not agreeable to natural justice that a
stranger should reap the pecuniary produce of another
Ubi eadem ratio ibi idem jus. man’s work.
Like reason doth make like law.

2
Surplusagium non nocet. Impossibilum nulla obigatio est.
Surplusage does not vitiate a statute. There is no obligation to do an impossible thing.

Utile per inutile non vitiatur. Lex non cogit ad impossibilia.


The useful is not vitiated by the non-useful. The law does not require an impossibility.

Falsa demostratio non nocet, cum de corpore constat. Lex non intendit aliquid impossible.
False description does not preclude construction nor vitiate The law does not intend the impossible.
the meaning of the statute.
C. IMPLICATIONS
Nil facit error nominis cum de corpora vel persona
constat. Ex necessitate legis.
Error in name does not make an instrument inoperative By the necessary implication of law.
when the description is sufficiently clear.
In eo quod plus sit, simper inest et minus.
Certum est quod certum reddi potest. The greater includes the lesser.
That is sufficiently certain which can be made certain.
Cui jurisdiction data est, ea quoque concessa esse
Ibi quid generaliter conceditur, inest haec exception, videntur sine quibus jurisdiction explicari non potuit.
si non aliquid sit contras jus basque.
Where anything is granted generally, exemption from rigid When jurisdiction is given, all powers and means essential
application of law is implied; that nothing shall be contrary to its exercise are also given.
to law and right.
Ubi jus, ibi remedium.
Summum jus, summa injuria. Where there is a right, there is a remedy for violation
The rigor of the law would be the highest injustice. thereof.

Jus summum saepe, summa est militia. Ubi jus incertum, ibi jus nullum.
Extreme law is often extreme wrong. Where the law is uncertain, there is no right.

Nemo tenetur ad impossibilia. Ex dolo malo non oritur action.


The law obliges no one to perform an impossibility. An action does not arise from fraud.

3
Nullius commodum capere potest de injuria sua Equivocal words or those with double meaning are to be
propria. understood according to their common and ordinary sense.
No one may derive advantage from his own unlawful act.
Verba artis ex arte.
In pari delicto potior est condition defendentis. Words of art should be explained from their usage in the art
Where the parties are equally at fault, the position of the to which they belong.
defending party is the better one.
Verba generalia restringuntur ad habilitatem rei vel
Quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo, prohibetur et personam.
per obliquum. General words should be confined according to the subject-
What cannot, by law, be done directly cannot be done matter or persons to which they relate.
indirectly.
Ubi lex non distinguit necnon distinguere debemus.
Where the law does not distinguish, the courts should not
Chapter V – INTERPRETATION OF WORDS AND distinguish.
PHRASES
Dissimilum dissimilis est ratio.
A. IN GENERAL Of things dissimilar, the rule is dissimilar.

Generalia verba sunt generaliter intelligenda. B. ASSOCIATED WORDS


General words should be understood in their general sense.
Noscitur a sociis.
Generis dictum generaliter est interpretandum. A thing is known by its associates.
A general statement is understood in its general sense.
Ejusdem generis.
Verba accipienda sunt secundum subjectam Of the same kind or species.
materiam.
A word is to be understood in the context in which it is Expressio unius est exclusion alterius.
used. The express mention of one person, thing or consequence
implies the exclusion of all others.
Verba mere aequivoca, si per communem usum
loquendi in intellectu certo sumuntur, talis intellectus Expressum facit cessare tacitum.
preferendus est. What is expressed puts an end to that which is implied.

4
Argumentum a contrario.
Negative-Opposite Doctrine: what is expressed puts an end
to that which is implied.

Cassus omissus pro omisso habendus est.


A person, object or thing omitted from an enumeration
must be held to have been omitted intentionally.

Ad proximum antecedens fiat relatio nisi impediatur


sentential.
A qualifying word or phrase should be understood as
referring to the nearest antecedent.

Reddendo singular singulis.


Referring each to each, or referring each phrase or
expression to its appropriate object, or let each be put in its
proper place.

C. PROVISOS, EXCEPTIONS AND SAVING CLAUSES

Exceptio firmat regulam in casibus non exceptis.


A thing not being expected must be regarded as coming
within the purview of the general rule.

~pattythemighty 

También podría gustarte