Está en la página 1de 3

April 1993 | Volume 50 | Number 7

Authentic Learning Pages 78-80

Four Misconceptions about Authentic Learning


John F. Cronin

To keep the authentic learning movement alive, we must dispel some myths that may
discourage teachers from exploring the potential of this approach.
For the past two years, I have worked with schools in southwest Iowa that are investing great time
and money building teacher awareness of authentic learning and assessment. Their strategy for
raising awareness is fairly sophisticated. Many speakers on authentic assessment have visited, a
cadre of teachers trained in writing authentic tasks and assessments has been formed, and
curriculum committees are working with authentic measures as they rewrite subject matter guides.
Happily, a consensus has emerged in these schools that curriculum and assessment must radically
change. A window of opportunity for transformation has opened, and educators are restless to get
started. However, unless widespread improvements begin soon, that window will probably slam shut.
In my work with educators who are beginning this process, unfortunately, I have observed several
misconceptions about authentic learning that discourage teachers from persevering in their work.
Grasping these four misunderstandings can help us provide support that will result in more authentic
learning in the classroom.

If you can't take 'em to Spain, they might as well not learn Spanish at all.
The first misconception is that any learning context that is not completely authentic is fraudulent. The
truth is that lessons and units are neither completely authentic nor divorced from reality. The concept
is relative.
For example, teaching high school students to speak Spanish by requiring them to use the language
in classroom conversation is more authentic than instructing them to recite stock Spanish sentences
from a text. Similarly, learning Spanish by using the language during an internship in Spain is more
authentic than using it in classroom conversation. The fact that learning a language by living with
native speakers is the most effective way to learn Spanish does not make using the language in
classroom conversation a poor alternative.
If we understand that the concept of authenticity exists on a continuum, then we can reassure
teachers that making lessons more authentic does not require a complete reversal of present
practice. We are instead asking teachers to move in a more authentic direction along that continuum.
A couple of years ago I observed a class learning how to figure statistical means in a school. The
teacher wrote a list of numbers on the chalkboard, demonstrated the algorithm for determining a
mean, and asked several students to come up to perform the calculation on lists of raw numbers. The
teacher then assigned all of the problems in the textbook, which also happened to be lists of raw
numbers, but told the students to ignore the story problems. Sadly, it was the story problems that
contained examples of authentic situations where adults would calculate and use means. For
example, one asked students to determine a family's average electric bill given the past 12 billings.
Although this task is not as elaborate as some authentic tasks, it could easily have been modified to
provide a richer challenge.
The more important point is that finding the small and most obvious ways to make learning more
authentic is an excellent place to start. As educators gain experience mastering these skills with
simple applications, it becomes easier to implement sophisticated authentic tasks.

If you haven't got your chef's license, then you'll have to starve.
Many of us mistakenly believe that authentic learning is a completely new concept and that teachers
must master the process—or get their license, so to speak—to use it in the classroom. Our perplexing
vocabulary and intricate schemes for implementing authentic assessment may have inadvertently
created this impression.
Wiggins refutes this misconception, pointing out that much of the “extra-curriculum”—especially
music, drama, forensics, and athletics programs—has modeled learning in authentic contexts for
decades.1 Most classroom teachers also have experience with authentic forms of instruction. Any
social studies teacher who has asked students to write their legislator and any language arts teacher
who has asked students to write a résumé or participate in a simulated job interview has experience
with authentic tasks.
The prospect of making learning more authentic becomes less complicated if everyone recognizes
that we already have some experience with the concept. In short, one can cook without a chef's
credentials, and one can begin to work with authentic tasks without months of training and years of
planning.

If it isn't real fun, then it isn't real.


The third misconception is that tasks that are not original, creative, and fun are not authentic. Of
course, many examples of authentic tasks in the literature are stimulating projects with immediate
relevance to the lives of students. This is wonderful! Students need more of these opportunities.
Unfortunately, educators sometimes confuse engaging tasks with authentic ones. Thus, they may
become discouraged from trying authentic tasks with students because they lack the time and energy
to create elaborate and creative tasks from scratch.
The point of authentic learning is to let students encounter and master situations that resemble real
life. These situations are often stimulating and engaging. It is a grave mistake, however, to shield
students from the fact that some of life's work is tedious and unimaginative but, nonetheless,
absolutely necessary. For example, editing a sales proposal simulates important work that people do
in the real world, but many students will not find this task very interesting or understand its relevance.
An important part of maturing is learning the self-discipline to face these kinds of tasks.

If you want to learn to play the piano, you must start by mastering Chopin.
Finally, there is a misconception that all authentic tasks are elaborate and complex, never simple and
straightforward. As a result, some educators who would start composing authentic tasks think they
must begin with a sonata rather than a melody line. Many are intimidated by examples of authentic
tasks in the literature that are so challenging they can only be taught by the most experienced
educators and mastered by the most talented learners.
All of us want our children to master rich, complex, and authentic challenges during their school
careers. Fortunately, not everything we encounter in life is as complex and elaborate as some of the
most ambitious of these tasks: inventing a marketable product, for example, or rewriting the Bill of
Rights. Expecting a science teacher who is inexperienced with mentoring students through complex
projects to teach students to write an environmental impact statement for a proposed real estate
development is unrealistic.
In addition, this misconception sometimes causes teachers to overlook obvious opportunities for
making learning more authentic. Students frequently learn important skills by performing simple real-
world tasks they might encounter in daily life. For example, because I am concerned about my
weight, I recently learned to read grocery labels to estimate the proportion of calories coming from fat.
This skill helps me judge whether purchasing, and eating, low-fat ice cream is good for my diet. It is
also a straightforward task requiring skills of estimation, computation, and judgment. That does not
mean, however, that the skill is highly complex or takes an inordinate amount of time or
organizational talent to teach.
Realizing the Potential of Authentic Learning
Educators want to create authentic learning environments, but will act only when they are convinced
that they can manage the work. The four misconceptions identified here may lead educators to
believe teaching authentically is more difficult than it really is. Taking three steps to counter these
fallacies will help educators manage the task and improve their prospects for success:
 Work toward more authenticity, not complete authenticity. Let's be realistic. Not every learning
activity must duplicate real-life experiences. The hope is that, over time, activities will more closely
resemble the real world than they have in the past. When the expectation is more reasonable,
people may warm to it more quickly.
 Exploit available opportunities for authentic learning. Few people bake apple pies when they must
begin by planting the trees. Even traditional textbooks contain story problems, suggestions for
experiments, and ideas for projects that promote more authentic learning. The process of change
begins with taking advantage of available opportunities and more systematically tying them to
curriculum and assessment.
 Start with less complex tasks. Educators will have an easier time implementing authentic learning if
they feel free to begin with simpler adaptations of the concept. Drafting a letter to the editor on a
local environmental issue, for example, is an easier task to introduce than creating a Model United
Nations to investigate global environmental problems. Both are authentic and valuable learning
experiences. Experience will build the confidence educators need to attempt more complex tasks.
The power of the authentic learning movement has been in the simplicity of its central idea: students'
experiences in school should more closely resemble the experiences they encounter in real life. The
potential of this idea will be lost, however, if it is muddled by dense vocabulary and implementation
models that are too intricate for practitioners.
By developing a common language and keeping a focus on the simple theme of the movement, we
can help alleviate the misconceptions about authentic learning. More important, by keeping our
expectations realistic, capitalizing on available opportunities, and starting simply, we can ensure that
the window of opportunity remains open.

Endnote
1
G. Wiggins, (February 1991), “Standards, Not Standardization: Evoking Quality Student
Work,” Educational Leadership 48, 5: 18–25.