Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
10. Deutch T, Bocca S, Oehninger S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus three-
dimensional transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of Müllerian anomalies. Fertil
Steril 2006; 86: S308.
11. Faivre E1, Fernandez H, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Frydman R, Levaillant JM. Accuracy of
three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and
bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic
resonance imaging J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):101-6. doi:
10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.724. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
12. Fedele L , Dorta M , Vercellini P , Brioschi D , Candiani GB Ultrasound in the diagnosis
of subclasses of unicornuate uterus. Obstetrics and Gynecology [01 Feb 1988, 71(2):274-
277]
13. Ghi T. s.o. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of
congenital uterine anomalies. In: Fertil Steril. 2009, vol.92, nr.2, p.808-813.
14. Graupera B, Pascual MA, Hereter L, Browne JL, Úbeda B, Rodríguez I, Pedrero C
Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in
diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the
classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 2015 Nov;46(5):616-22. doi: 10.1002/uog.14825. Epub 2015 Oct 5
15. Grimbizis GF. S.o. Female genital tract congenital malformations (classifications,
diagnosis and management). Springer. London-Heidelberg-New York. 2015. 318p.
16. Johansson HKL, Svingen T, Fowler PA, Vinggaard AM, Boberg J. Environmental
influences on ovarian dysgenesis-developmental windows sensitive to chemical
exposures. In: Nat Rev Endocrinol 2017 Jul; 13(7): 400-414
17. Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, Jauniaux E, Natucci M, Campbell S. Three-
dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital
anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional
sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 233–237.
18. Kaufman RH, Adam E, Binder GL, Gerthoffer E. Upper genital tract changes and
pregnancy outcome in offspring exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1980;137(3):299–308.
19. Kaveh M, Mehdizadeh Kashi A, Sadegi K, Forghani F.Int J Fertil Steril. 2018 Jan; 11(4):318-320.
Epub 2017 Oct 12.
30. Saleem SN. MR imaging diagnosis of uterovaginal anomalies: current state of the
art. Radiographics 2003; 23: e13.
31. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal
occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian
anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. In: Fertil Steril. 1988, vol.49, nr.6, p.944-955.
32. Yoo RE. s.o. Magnetic resonance evaluation of Müllerian remnants in
MayerRokitanskyKüster-Hauser syndrome. In: Korean J Radiol. 2013, vol.14, nr.2,
p.233-239.