Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Lecturers :
1) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sia Chee Kiong – (S1 & S2)
2) Mr. Mohd Azwir Bin Azlan (S3 & S4)
3) Dr. Koh Ching Theng - (S5 & S6)
4) Mr. Mohd Nizam bin Katimon- (S7 & S8)
5) Dr. Ahmad Mubarak Bin Tajul Ariffin – (S9 & S10)
FACULTY : FACULTY OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING (FKMP)
SEMESTER : 2
SESION : 2017 / 2018
COURSE : BDA 31203 - MECHANICAL COMPONENT DESIGN (MCD)
TIME SCHEDULE
11.00 - 11.50
12.00 - 12.50
1.00 - 2.00
2.00 - 2.50
3.00 - 3.50
4.00 - 4.50
5.00 - 5.50
6.00 - 6.50
7.00 - 8.00
8.00 - 8.50
9.00 - 10.00
10.00 - 11.00
Sem 2 Sesi 2017/2018
dari seksyen mengakui bahawa saya telah mengikuti kuliah ganti yang telah diajar oleh
(PM Dr. Sia / Dr. Koh / Dr. Mubarak / En. Azwir / En. Nizam ) pada bagi
(Sila potong yang tidak berkenaan)
Sila tandakan () bagi topik / kuliah ganti yang telah diikuti.
........................................... ...........................................
Tarikh : Nama Pensyarah :
Tarikh :
Lampiran A
PERANCANGAN KULIAH
LECTURE PLAN
Kursus Pra-syarat (Prerequisite course) : BDA 10703 – Lukisan Teknikal & CAD /
Technical Drawing & CAD
BDA 20903 – Mekanik Pepejal II / Solid Mechanics II
Nama Staf Akademik (Name of Academic Staff) : Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sia Chee Kiong (S1 & S2)
Mr. Mohd Azwir bin Azlan (S3 & S4) – coordinator
Dr. Koh Ching Theng (S5 & S6)
Mr. Mohd Nizam bin Katimon (S7 & S8)
Dr. Ahmad Mubarak bin Tajul Arifin (S9 & S10)
Tarikh (Date): 05th February 2018 Tarikh (Date): 05th February 2018
MATLAMAT (GOALS):
Matlamat kursus ini adalah untuk menyediakan para pelajar dengan keupayaan untuk mengaplikasi,
menganalisis dan merekabentuk komponen mesin yang lazim seperti, aci, galas, giar dan skru yang
menekankan kepada kekuatan, ketegaran, kegagalan statik dan lesu.
The goal of this course is to provide the student with the capability to apply, analyze and design of
standard machine components such as shaft, bearing, gears and screws etc. which are emphasized on
strength, rigidity, static and fatigue failure.
SINOPSIS (SYNOPSIS):
Kursus ini terdiri daripada analisis, sintesis dan reka bentuk bagi komponen mekanikal asas dan kompleks
iaitu galas, aci, giar, sambungan kekal dan tidak kekal, spring, skru dan pengikat dengan mengambil kira
faktor kekuatan, ketegaran, keboleharapan serta kegagalan statik dan lesu.
This course consists of analysis, synthesis and design basic and complex mechanical component i.e.
bearings, shafts, gears, permanent and non permanent joining, springs, screw and fastener with
consideration of strength, rigidity, reliability, static and fatigue failure.
Calculate factor of safety by using static and fatigue failure of theories. (C3, LO1)
Evaluate several machine components (i.e. gears, shafts and bearing) that function in one
mechanical system or machine. (C5, LO10)
Seek for the most appropriate information source for component selection in the design project.
(A3, LO6)
Produce model and simulate by using engineering software for project design validation.
(C4, LO2)
2.0 ANALISIS DAN SINTESIS (ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS) ---- Ujian 1 (1st Test)
(2 hours)
2.1 Kekuatan dan Kekerasan Bahan (Material Strength and Stiffness)
2.2 Keseimbangan dan GBB (Equilibrium and FBD)
2.3 Jenis-Jenis Daya (Types of Load)
2.4 Tegasan (Stress)
2.5 Prinsip Tegasan untuk Tegasan Satah (Principle Stress for Plane
Stress)
2.6 Bulatan Mohr bagi Tegasan Satah (Mohr’s Circle for aPlane
Stress)
2.7 Asas Tegasan 3 Dimensi (General 3 Dimensional Stress)
2.8 Tegasan Tertabur Seragam (Uniformly Distributed Stresses)
2.9 Tegasan Normal pada Rasuk akibat Lenturan (Normal Stress for
Beam in Bending)
2.10 Tegasan Ricih pada Rasuk akibat Lenturan (Shear Stress for
Beam in Bending)
2.11 Kilasan (Torsion)
2.12 Penumpuan Tegasan (Stress Concentration)
W6 - UJIAN 1 (1st TEST) --- (1.5 hours) (27/03/2018 ; 8:00 – 9:30 pm)
W10 - UJIAN 2 (2nd Test) --- (2.5 hours) (02/05/2018 ; 8:00 – 10:30 pm)
Projek rekabentuk merupakan antara aspek penting di dalam kursus ini. Ia membawa pemberat bernilai
40% di mana ianya bertujuan untuk memenuhi kehendak Universiti yang menawarkan pengajaran dan
pembelajaran berkualiti berpusatkan pelajar dengan melaksanakan aktiviti PBL (Problem Based
Learning).
Projek ini akan dijalankan di dalam kumpulan di mana setiap kumpulan mempunyai ahli antara 3 hingga
5 orang pelajar. Projek ini berhubungkait dengan merekabentuk sebuah kotak transmisi yang bersesuaian
yang akan digunakan pada sebuah mesin. Pelajar perlu menganalisis semua komponen-komponen
mekanikal di dalam sistem gearbox/transmisi seperti aci, galas dan giar dari segi kekuatan, keselamatan
statik dan lesu, keboleharapan, pergerakan dinamik, jangka hayat dan lain-lain seperti apa yang telah
dipelajari dalam teori bagi meramalkan sistem fizikal dan tingkah laku sebenar produk. Kemudian,
pelajar perlu membuat pemodelan 3D rekabentuk tersebut beserta dengan lukisan kejuruteraannya
dengan menggunakan perisian CAD yang bersesuaian.
Design project is one of the important aspects in this course where it brings 40% of marks. This design project is
target to meet the requirements of the University which offer high quality learning through student-centered
learning by implementation of a PBL (Problem Based Learning) activity.
The project will be carried out in groups where each group has 3 to 5 members. In this project, students have to
design an appropriate gearbox that will apply to a machine. Students must analyze all mechanical components
inside the gearbox / transmission system such as shaft, bearing and gears in term of their strength, static and
fatigue safety, reliability, dynamic motion, life estimation and others like what have been learned in the theory to
predict the real physical system and product behaviour. Then students also need to make a 3D model of their
design include with the engineering drawing by using suitable CAD software.
PENTAKSIRAN (ASSESSMENT):
1. Kuiz (Quiz) : 0 %
2. Tugasan (Assignment) : 10 %
3. Ujian (Test) : 50 %
4. Project (Project) : 40 %
5. Lain-lain (Others) : 0 %
6. Peperiksaan Akhir (Final Examination) : 0 %
RUJUKAN (REFERENCES):
1. BDA 31203 Lecturer Notes
2. Richard. G. Budynas, J. Keith Nisbett, (2015), “Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design”, Tenth
Edition in SI Units, McGraw Hill Education. (ISBN: 978-981-4595-28-5)
3. Robert L. Mott, (2014), “Machine Elements in Mechanical Design”, New Jersey: Pearson.
(ISBN: 978-013-3349-07-8)
4. Robert L. Norton, (2011), “Machine Design – An Integrated Approach (Fourth Edition)”, New Jersey:
Pearson. (ISBN: 978-013-6123-70-5) ; (Call number: TJ230 .N67 2011)
1. Pelajar mesti hadir tidak kurang dari 80% masa pertemuan yang ditentukan bagi sesuatu kursus termasuk
kursus Hadir Wajib (HW) dan kursus Hadir Sahaja (HS).
Students must attend not less than 80% of the contact hours specified for a course including Compulsory
Attendance (HW) course and Attendance Only (HS) course.
2. Pelajar yang tidak memenuhi perkara 1 di atas tidak dibenarkan menghadiri kuliah dan menduduki
sebarang bentuk pentaksiran selanjutnya. Markah sifar ‘0’ akan diberikan kepada pelajar yang gagal
memenuhi perkara 1. Manakala untuk kursus HW, pelajar yang gagal memenuhi perkara 1 akan diberi
gred Hadir Gagal (HG).
Students who do not fulfill item 1 of the above are not allowed to attend further lecture and sit for any
form of assessment. Zero ‘0’ mark will be given to students who fail to comply with item 1. As for HW
course, students who fail to comply with item 1 will be given Failure Attendance (HG) grade.
3. Pelajar perlu patuh kepada peraturan berpakaian yang berkuatkuasa dan menjaga disiplin diri masing-
masing untuk mengelakkan dari tindakan tatatertib diambil terhadap pelajar.
Students should adhere to the dress regulations in effect and must discipline themselves to avoid from
any disciplinary actions.
4. Pelajar perlu mematuhi peraturan keselamatan semasa aktiviti pembelajaran dan pengajaran.
Students should adhere to the safety regulations during the learning and teaching activities.
Fakulti (Faculty) : FACULTY OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING Matrik ini perlu digunakan bersama:
(This matrix is to be used together with)
Program (Programme) : BACHELOR OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING WITH HONOURS 1. Objektif Pendidikan Program (PEO)
(Programme Educational Objectives (PEO))
Kod Kursus (Course Code) : BDA 31203 2. Hasil Pembelajaran Program (PLO)
(Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO))
Nama Kursus (Course Title) : MECHANICAL COMPONENT DESIGN
Pemetaan kepada PLO (Mapping to PLO) Kaedah
Kaedah
PLO11
PLO10
PLO12
PLO13
Bil. Hasil Pembelajaran Kursus Pentaksiran
PLO1
PLO2
PLO3
PLO4
PLO5
PLO6
PLO7
PLO8
PLO9
Penyampaian KPI*
(No.) (Course Learning Outcomes) (Method of
(Method of Delivery)
Assessment)
1 Calculate factor of safety by using static Lecture, Assignment 1, 100%
and fatigue failure of theories. (C3, LO1) Case Study, Assignment 2, students
C3
Project – Report, pass
Test 1.
2 Evaluate several machine components Lecture, Test 2, 100%
(i.e. gears, shafts and bearing) that Case Study, Test 3, students
C5
function in one mechanical system or PO-PBL Project - Report. pass
machine. (C5, LO10)
3 Seek for the most appropriate information PO-PBL Project - Soft Skill. 100%
source for component selection in the A3 students
design project. (A3, LO6) pass
4 Produce model and simulate by using PO-PBL Project - Drawing. 100%
engineering software for project design C4 students
validation. (C4, LO2) pass
*KPI – Petunjuk prestasi utama (Key performance indicator)
Jumlah (Total) 1 1 1 1
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design
• 1.5 - Design Engineer’s Professional Responsibilities • To design is either to formulate a plan for satisfaction of
a specified need or to solve a problem.
• 1.6 - Standards and Codes
• 1.7 - Economics
• Design is an innovative and highly iterative process. It is
also a decision making process.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 3 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 4
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design
• Examples:
A simple journal bearing involves fluid flow, heat transfer, friction,
energy transport, material selection, thermomechanical
treatments, and so on.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 5 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 6
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design
Recognition of need
Recognition of Need Definition of Problem
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 7 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 8
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 9 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 10
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design
Evaluation Presentation
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 11 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 12
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design
1.4 - Design Tools and Resources 1.5 - Design Engineer’s Professional Responsibilities
Today engineer has a great variety of tools and resources available to • Required to satisfy the needs of customers and is expected to do so
assist in the solution of design problems:-
in a competent, responsible, ethical and professional manner.
¾ Computational Tools
CAD (Computer Aided Design) – AutoCAD, I-Deas, SolidWorks, ProEngineer
CAE (Computer Aided Engineering) – Cosmos, Algor, Fluent, ADAMS • The way to develop professional work ethic and skills:
CAM (Computer Aided Manufacturing) – MasterCam, UniGraphic, SolidCAM – Sharpen your communication skills either oral or writing
– Keep a neat and clear journal / logbook of your activities, entering dated
¾ Acquiring Technical Information
entries frequently
Libraries – Encyclopaedia, Monographs, Handbooks, Journals
Government sources – U.S. Patent and Trademarks Office, SIRIM – Develop a systematic approach when working on a design problem
Professional societies – ASME, SAE, SME, ASTM, AWS – Must keep current in the field of expertise by being an active member of
Commercial vendors – Catalogs, Test data, Samples, Cost information a professional society, attending meetings, conferences and seminar of
Internet – the computer network gateway to website associated with most of the societies, manufacturers, universities, etc.
categories listed above.
– Conduct activities in an ethical manner.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 13 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 14
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design
• Standard – is a set of specifications for parts, materials, or Some organizations or societies that interest to mechanical engineers are:-
processes intended to achieve uniformity, efficiency and
Aluminum Association (AA)
a specific quality. American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA)
– aim to place a limit on the number of items in the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)
specification so as to provide a reasonable inventory of American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI)
tooling, sizes, shapes and varieties. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM)
American Welding Society (AWS)
• Code – is a set of specifications for the analysis, design,
American Bearing Manufacturers Association (ABMA)
manufacture and construction of something.
British Standards Institute (BSI)
– aim to achieve a specific degree of safety, efficiency Industrial Fasteners Institute (IFI)
and performance or quality. Institution of Mechanical Engineers (I. Mech. E.)
International Bureau of Weights and Measure (BIMP)
International Standard Organization (ISO)
Society of Automotive Engineer (SAE)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 15 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 16
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 1 – Introduction to Engineering Design
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 17 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 18
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
What you will be learn here? What you will be learn here?
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 3 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 4
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
2.1 – Material Strength and Stiffness 2.1 – Material Strength and Stiffness – cont…
• pl ⇒ Proportional limits
– Curve begins to deviate from a straight line
The standard tensile test is used to obtain a variety of material Stress-strain diagram obtained from the – No permanent set observable
standard tensile test for Ductile material – The slope of the linear known as Young’s modulus or the
characteristics and strengths that are used in design. Modulus of elasticity; E.
• el ⇒ Elastic limit
– Beyond this limit, plastic deformation will occur and material
will take on permanent set when load is removed
• y ⇒ Yield point
– Strain begins to increase very rapidly without a
corresponding increase in stress
– Point ‘a’ is define by offset method usually about 0.2% from
original gauge length (ε = 0.002)
– Stress at this point known as yield strength, Sy
A typical tension-test specimen. Some of the standard
dimensions used for do are 2.5, 6.25 and 12.5 mm and • u ⇒ maximum stress
0.505 in, but other sections and sizes are in use. Common – Stress at this point known as Ultimate or tensile strength, Su
gauge length lo used are 10, 25 and 50 mm and 1 and 2 in. • f ⇒ fracture point
– Stress at this point known as fracture strength, Sf
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 5 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 6
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
2.1 – Material Strength and Stiffness – cont… 2.2 – Equilibrium and Free Body Diagram
• y ⇒ Yield point
Stress-strain diagram obtained from the – Strain begins to increase very rapidly without a
Equilibrium
standard tensile test for Brittle material corresponding increase in stress
– Point ‘a’ is define by offset method usually about 0.2% from • Assume that the system to be studied is motionless or at most have
original gauge length (ε = 0.002) constant velocity then the system has zero acceleration.
– Stress at this point known as yield strength, Sy
• u ⇒ maximum stress
• Under this condition, the system is said to be in equilibrium.
– Stress at this point known as Ultimate or tensile strength, Su
• For equilibrium, the forces and moments acting on the system
• f ⇒ fracture point
balance such that:
– Stress at this point known as fracture strength, Sf
2.2 – Equilibrium and Free Body Diagram – cont… 2.2 – Equilibrium and Free Body Diagram – cont…
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 9 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 10
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
2.2 – Equilibrium and Free Body Diagram – cont… 2.3 – Types of Load
Bending load
Tension load
Answers:
To = 480 Ibf
RAY = 192 Ibf
RAZ = 69.9 Ibf
RBY = 128 Ibf Torsion load
RBZ = 46.6 Ibf
RCY = 192 Ibf
RCZ = 69.9 Ibf
Compression load
RDY = 128 Ibf
RDZ = 46.6 Ibf
Shear load
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 11 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 12
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 13 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 14
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
2.5 – Principle Stress for Plane Stress 2.6 – Mohr’s Circle for Plane Stress
σy σave
τxy τ1,2
σave
σx φ
θo
τ1,2
τxy
Stress components on surface Maximum and minimum normal Maximum shear stresses have
normal to ‘x’ and ‘y’ direction stresses are called principle stresses average normal stresses
which have zero shear stresses
σ x +σ y ⎛ σ x −σ y ⎞
2
⎛ σ x −σ y ⎞
2
σ x +σ y
σ1,σ 2 = ± ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + τ xy2 τ 1 ,τ 2 = ± ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + τ xy2 σ ave =
2 ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠ 2
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 15 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 16
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
2.7 – General Three Dimensional (3D) Stress 2.8 – Uniformly Distributed Stresses
• In design, 3D transformations are rarely Simple tension, compression and shear loads that always perform this uniform
performed since most maximum stress distribution of stress which results
states occur under plane stress conditions.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 17 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 18
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
2.9 – Normal Stresses for Beams in Bending 2.9 – Normal Stresses for Beams in Bending – cont…
A B Shear-force diagram
Mmax =
MB
MA
A B
Bending-moment diagram
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 19 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 20
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
2.10 – Shear Stresses for Beams in Bending 2.10 – Shear Stresses for Beams in Bending – cont…
3ν 2ν
τ max = τ max =
2A A
Rectangular Hollow, thin-walled round
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 21 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 22
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
• Any moment vector that is collinear with an • Obtain the torque T from a consideration of the power and speed of a rotating shaft
axis of a mechanical element is called a • When USC units is used, the equation is :
torque vector or torsion.
FV 2πTn πTn Tn
• For solid round bar, the shear stress is zero at H= = = =
the center at maximum at the surface. 33,000 33,000(12) 198,000 63,025
where ; where ;
Tr H = power (hp) n = shaft speed (rev/min)
τ max = T = torque
r = bar radius (1 hp = 33,000 ft.Ib/s) F = force (Ibf)
J J = polar second moment of area T = torque (Ibf.in) V = velocity (ft/min)
• For noncircular cross-section members especially rectangular b x c • When SI units is used, the equation is : • The torque T corresponding
section bar which use to transmit torque, maximum shearing stress is: to the power in watts is given
H = Tω approximately by
T ⎛ 1.8 ⎞ where ;
where ;
τ max = 2 ⎜3 + ⎟ b = is the longer side
H = power (W) H
bc ⎝ b / c ⎠ c = is the shorter side
T = torque (Nm) T = 9.55
ω = angular velocity (rad/s) n
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 23 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 24
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
P
Parts Fail When? • Analysis
Factor of Safety =
Failure Strength
Applied Stress
Sy
Crack initiation site Example : N=
σ
Factor of
Application
Safety
Material properties known in detail. Operating conditions known in detail Loads and
resultant stresses and strains known with high degree of certainty. Material test
1.25 - 1.5
certificates, proof loading, regular inspection and maintenance. Low weight is
important to design.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
2.15 – Factors Effecting Design Factor 2.15 – Factors Effecting Design Factor
2.15 – Factors Effecting Design Factor 2.15 – Factors Effecting Design Factor
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 33 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 34
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
2.15 – Factors Effecting Design Factor 2.15 – Factors Effecting Design Factor
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 35 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 36
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
2.15 – Factors Effecting Design Factor 2.16 – Predictions of Failure for Static Loads
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 37 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 38
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
• Brittle Materials: be an inertia that we wish to rotate, but for the purpose of a stress analysis we can consider this is a
static problem.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 39 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 40
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
Solution : Solution :
(a) The results are:- (b) Maximum torsional and bending stress at arm BC
At C ; F = -300j Ibf, T = -450k Ibf.in • The bending moment will reach a maximum near
At end B of arm BC ; F = 300j Ibf, M = 1200i Ibf.in, T = 450k Ibf.in the shaft at B which is 1200 Ibf.in
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 41 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 42
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
Solution : Solution :
(c) Stress element on the top surface of the shaft at A (d) Maximum normal and shear stresses at A.
τxz x
• The bending is tensile and is
σx A σx
τxz
Mc M (d / 2) 32 M The maximum normal stress is given by The maximum shear stress is
z σ= = =
I πd 4 πd 3 2
⎛ σ x −σ z ⎞
2
64 σ x +σ z ⎛σ −σ z ⎞
σ1 = + ⎜ x ⎟ + τ xz
2
τ1 = ⎜ ⎟ + τ xz
2
32(1950) 2 ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
= = 47,100 psi
π (0.753 ) 2 2
47.1 + 0 ⎛ 47.1 − 0 ⎞ 2 ⎛ 47.1 − 0 ⎞
= + ⎜ ⎟ + 14.5 = ⎜ ⎟ + 14.5
2
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 43 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 44
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
Example 2: Solution :
The 1.5-in diameter solid steel shaft shown in figure below is simply supported at the ends. Two pulleys (a) Figure below shows the FBD of the net forces, reactions and torsional moments on the shaft.-
are keyed to the shaft where pulley B is of diameter 4.0 in and pulley C is of diameter 8.0 in. Considering
bending and torsional stress only, determine the locations and magnitudes of the greatest tensile,
compressive, and shear stresses in the shaft.
• Although this is a 3D problem, the components of the moment vector is perform in a two plane analysis.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 45 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 46
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 2 – Analysis and Synthesis
Solution : Solution :
• Thus the moment are label as My versus x for xy plane and Mz versus x for xz plane:- • In this case where the shaft diameter is same along the axis, maximum bending stress
occurs at location where the bending moment is maximum which is at point B.
Mc M (d / 2) 32 M 32(8246)
σ= = = = = 24,890 psi
I πd 4 / 64 πd 3 π (1.53 )
• The maximum torsional shear stress occurs between B and C and is:
Tr T (d / 2) 16T 16(1600)
τ= = = = = 2414 psi
J πd 4 / 32 πd 3 π (1.53 )
• Maximum tensile stress σ1 is given by:
2 2
σ x +σ z ⎛ σ −σ z ⎞ 24,890 ⎛ 24,890 ⎞
σ1 = + ⎜ x ⎟ + τ xz =
2
+ ⎜ 2
⎟ + 2414 = 25,120 psi
2 ⎝ 2 ⎠ 2 ⎝ 2 ⎠
2 2
• The net moment on a section is the vector sum of the components. That is ⎛σ x −σ z ⎞ ⎛ 24,890 ⎞
τ1 = ⎜ ⎟ + τ xz = ⎜
2 2
⎟ + 2414 = 12,680 psi
M = M y2 + M z2 ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
M B = 2000 2 + 8000 2 = 8246 Ibf.in
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 2 2 47 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 48
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, M C = 4000 + 4000 = 5657 Ibf.in Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 3 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 4
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 5 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 6
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
Static Failure
Actually, there is no universal theory of failure for the general Theories
case of material properties and stress state.
Over the years, several hypotheses have been formulated and Ductile Materials Brittle Materials
tested, leading today’s engineering practice. - ε f ≥ 0.05 - ε f < 0.05
Being accepted worldwide, these practices are used as theories - S yt = S yc = S y - Sut & Suc
as most designers do.
Yield Criteria Fracture Criteria
-Maximum Shear Stress -Maximum Normal Stress
-Distortion Energy -Brittle-Coulomb-Mohr
-Ductile Coulomb-Mohr
3.4 – Maximum Shear Stress (MSS) Theory 3.4 – Maximum Shear Stress (MSS) Theory – cont…
predicts that yielding begins whenever the maximum shear stress in any
element equals or exceeds the maximum shear stress in a tension-test Sy
of the same material. τ max =
also known as Tresca or Guest Theory.
2
for a simple tensile stress σ, max. shear stress occurs on a surface 450
from the tensile surface with a magnitude of:
σ
τ max =
2 σ −σ S
∴ 1 3= y
or at yield, τmax = S y 2 2
2
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 9 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 10
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
3.4 – Maximum Shear Stress (MSS) Theory – cont… 3.4 – Maximum Shear Stress (MSS) Theory – cont…
Case 2 : σA ≥ 0 ≥ σB.
S sy 0.50S y Sy / 2 Sy Here, σ1 = σA , σ3 = σB.
N= = = =
τ max τ max (σ 1 − σ 3 ) / 2 (σ 1 − σ 3 ) Case 3 : 0 ≥ σA ≥ σB.
For this case, σ1 = 0 , σ3 = σ B.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 11 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 12
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
3.5 – Distortion Energy (DE) Theory 3.5 – Distortion Energy (DE) Theory – cont…
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
3.5 – Distortion Energy (DE) Theory – cont… 3.5 – Distortion Energy (DE) Theory – cont…
1
strain energy = U = σε
2 σ1 + σ 2 + σ 3
σ av =
for 3-D analysis; 3
1
U= (σ 1ε1 + σ 2ε 2 + σ 3ε 3 ) The strain energy for producing only
2
volume change Uv can be obtained by
1 substituting σav for σ1, σ2, and σ3 in Eq. (1).
where ε1 = (σ 1 − vσ 2 − vσ 3 ) The result is:-
E
1
ε 2 = (σ 2 − vσ 1 − vσ 3 )
E
3σ 2 av
1
ε 3 = (σ 3 − vσ 1 − vσ 2 )
Uv = (1 − 2v ) ------- (2)
E 2E
1
U= ⎡σ 12 + σ 22 + σ 32 − 2v (σ 1σ 2 + σ 2σ 3 + σ 1σ 3 ) ⎤⎦ ------- (1)
2E ⎣
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 15 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 16
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
3.5 – Distortion Energy (DE) Theory – cont… 3.5 – Distortion Energy (DE) Theory – cont…
Von Mises Effective Stress
Ud = U −Uv
⎛σ +σ2 +σ3 ⎞
2 σ ' = σ 12 + σ 22 + σ 32 − σ 1σ 2 − σ 2σ 3 − σ 1σ 3
⎧ 1 ⎫ 3⎜ 1 ⎟ (1 − 2v )
=⎨ ⎡⎣σ 12 + σ 22 + σ 32 − 2v (σ 1σ 2 + σ 2σ 3 + σ 1σ 3 ) ⎤⎦ ⎬ ⎝ 3 ⎠
⎩ 2E ⎭ −
(σ − σ y ) + (σ y − σ z ) + (σ z − σ x ) + 6 (τ xy2 + τ yz2 + τ zx2 )
2 2 2
2E
σ =
' x
2
1+ v 2
Ud = ⎡⎣σ 1 + σ 22 + σ 32 − σ 1σ 2 − σ 2σ 3 − σ 1σ 3 ⎤⎦ --- for element
3E in speciment
σ ' = σ 12 − σ 1σ 3 + σ 32 (for 2D principal stress)
(1 + v ) --- for yield in simple tension where σ1 = Sy ,
Ud = S y2 σ2 = σ3 = 0
3E
σ ' = σ x2 + σ y2 − σ xσ y + 3τ xy2 (for 2D plane stress)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 17 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 18
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
3.5 – Distortion Energy (DE) Theory – cont… 3.5 – Distortion Energy (DE) Theory – cont…
1+υ 2 1+υ 2
[ ] S y2 = σ 12 + σ 1σ 1 + σ 12 = 3σ 12 = 3τ max
2
σ 1 + σ 22 + σ 32 − σ 1σ 2 − σ 2σ 3 − σ 1σ 3 ≥ Sy
3E 3E
Sy
σ1 = = 0.577 S y = τ max
σ 12 + σ 22 + σ 32 − σ 1σ 2 − σ 2σ 3 − σ 1σ 3 ≥ S y 3
σ average
σ ' ≥ S y2
S sy
n= S sy = 0.577 S y
Therefore, safety factor N is: N=
Sy τ max τ max
σ' σ average
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 19 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 20
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 21 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 22
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
3.6 – Coulomb-Mohr Theory – cont… 3.7 – Maximum Normal Stress (MNS) Theory
σ1 σ 3 1
σ1 > Sut or σ3 < - Suc
− =
St Sc n
- where Sut and Suc are the ultimate tensile and
For pure torsional shear strength;
compressive strength respectively
S sy S yt S yc
n= S sy =
τ max S yt + S yc
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 23 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 24
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
3.7 – Maximum Normal Stress (MNS) Theory – cont… 3.8 – Modification of Mohr Theory
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 25 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 26
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
3.8 – Modification of Mohr Theory – cont… 3.8 – Modification of Mohr Theory – cont…
Equations
Theories
σA ≥σB ≥ 0 σA ≥ 0 ≥σB 0 ≥σA ≥σB
Brittle Coulomb- S ut σA σB 1 S uc
σA ≥ − = σB ≥ −
Mohr n Sut Suc n n
S ut ( Suc − Sut )σ A σ B 1 S uc
Modified I-Mohr σA ≥ − = σB ≥ −
n Suc Sut Suc n n
2
S ut nσ A ⎛ nσ B + Sut ⎞ S uc
Modified II-Mohr σA ≥ +⎜ ⎟ =1 σB ≥ −
n Sut ⎜⎝ Sut − Suc ⎟⎠ n
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 27 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 28
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 3 – Static Design Failure of Theories
Conclusion
Problem
Certain stresses are applied at one object which σ1 = 200 MPa and σ2 = -50 MPa.
This object is made by steel that it has a yield strength of 500 MPa. Find the factor of
safety of this object by using DE and MSS theory. Solve FOS by using graph method.
Answer
[MPa]
500
200
[MPa]
500
- 500 - 50 •A B
••C
Y
- 500
FOS
y x
DE ⇒ n = MSS ⇒ n =
200 200
Exercise 2:
Problem
Determine the safety factors for the bracket rod shown in figure above based on both
the distortion-energy theory and the maximum shear theory and compare them.
Given:
The material is 2024-T4 aluminum with a yield strength of 47 000 psi. The rod length
l = 6 in and arm a = 8 in. The rod outside diameter d = 1.5 in. Load F=1 000 lb.
Assumptions:
The load is static and the assembly is at room temperature. Consider shear due to
transverse loading as well as other stresses.
Answer
Element at point A
1.
MC ( Fl ) c 1 000 ( 6)( 0.75)
σx = = = = 18 108 psi
I I 0.249
2 2
⎛σ −σ z ⎞ ⎛ 18108 − 0 ⎞
2. τ max = ⎜ x ⎟ + τ 2 xy = ⎜ 2
⎟ + 12072 = 15090 psi
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
σ x +σ z 18108
σ1 = + τ max = + 15 090 = 24144 psi
2 2
σ2 = 0
σx +σz 18108
σ3 = − τ max = − 15090 = −6036 psi
2 2
3. σ ' = σ 1 2 − σ 1σ 3 + σ 3 2
Sy 47000
4. N= = = 1.7 ------------- DE theory
σ' 27661
0.50 S y 0.50(47000)
5. N= = = 1.6 --------------- MSS theory
τ max 15090
Element at point B
4V 4(1000)
6. τ bending = = = 755 psi
3 A 3(1.767)
0.577 S y 0.577(47000)
7. N= = = 2.1 --------- DE theory
τ max 12827
0.50 S y 0.50(47000)
N= = = 1.8 -------- MSS theory
τ max 12827
Exercise 3:
Problem
A 25-mm diameter shaft is statically torqued to 230 Nm. It is made of cast 195-T6
aluminium, with a yield strength in tension of 160 MPa and a yield strength in
compression of 170 MPa. It is machined to final diameter. Estimate the factor of
safety of the shaft.
Answer
Tr 16T 16(230)
τ= = = = 75MPa
J πd 3 π 2.53
The two nonzero principal stresses are 75 and -75 MPa, making the ordered principal
stresses σ1 = 75, σ2 = 0, and σ3 = -75 MPa.
1 1
∴n = = = 1.10
σ1 σ3 75 / 160 − (−75) / 170
−
S yt S yc
Alternatively;
S yt S yc S sy 82.4
S sy = ∴n = = = 1.10
S yt + S yc τ max 75
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
Fatigue Design Failure of Theories • confidently apply this technique in the selection and
analysis of machine components, and make decision on
material selection.
Prepared by: Mohd Azwir Bin Azlan
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 3 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 4
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.2 – Fatigue Load and Failure 4.2 – Fatigue Load and Failure – cont…
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 5 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 6
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.2 – Fatigue Load and Failure – cont… 4.2 – Fatigue Load and Failure – cont…
1st Case – Continuously bending the steel wire 2nd Case – Vehicle Axle
Wire
Wireisisbend
bendfrom
fromthe
thetop
top
Stress : Bending stress; σ ↓↓
Top Stress : Bending Stress σ and Shear Stress τ
Top of the wire is sufferedtoto
of the wire is suffered
“Tension”
“Tension”(+σ)
(+σ) Torsion shear stress: is cause when power
↓↓
Meanwhile
from the engine is transmit to the tire.
Meanwhilethethebottom
bottomisissuffered
sufferedtoto Torque are required to overcome tire
“Compression”
“Compression”(-σ) (-σ) Shaft axle is suffered to bending
and shear stress while running. friction and vehicle weight and this stress is
Graph
Graphplotting
plottingfor
foroverall
overallwire
wirebending
bending always assume as constant.
process:
process:
+ τ
σ
σa
σr
σm = 0 σa
t τm
Tension
−
Compression σ
This type of stress is known as Completely
This type of stress is known as Completely Shear Stress cause by torsion
Reverse Stress
Reverse Stress
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 7 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 8
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.2 – Fatigue Load and Failure – cont… 4.3 – Life and Fatigue Strength
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 9 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 10
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.3 – Life and Fatigue Strength – cont… 4.4 – Stress Life Method
Fatigue AnS-N
An S-Ndiagram
diagramplotted
plottedfrom
fromthe
theresults
resultsofofcompletely
completelyreversed
reversedaxial
axialfatigue
fatiguetest.
test.Material
Material
Fatiguestrength
strengthalso
alsohave
haveits
itsmaximum
maximumlimits.
limits. R. R Moore Test UNS
UNSG4100
G4100steel, normalized.––SS: :strength,
steel,normalized. strength,NN: :cycle
cycle
compression Sample ujian
tension
motor
Procedure
Procedureofofrotating
rotatingbeam
beamtest
test
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 11 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 12
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
Basically,
Basically,the
thefatigue
fatigueendurance limitsSSe eare
endurancelimits aredetermine
determinethrough
throughthe
thetest.
test.Yet
Yetthe
thedata
dataare
arealso
alsoavailable
available
on
onthese
thesestandard:
standard:
i.i.American
AmericanSociety
SocietyofofTesting
Testingand
andMaterials
Materials(ASTM)
(ASTM)
ii.ii.American
AmericanIron
Ironand
andSteel
SteelInstitute
Institute(AISI)
(AISI)
iii. Society of Automotive Engineer (SAE)
iii. Society of Automotive Engineer (SAE)
ItItisisunrealistic
unrealistictotoexpect
expectthe
theendurance
endurancelimit
limitofofaamechanical
mechanicalororstructural
structuralmember
membertotomatch
matchthe
thevalues
values
obtained
obtainedininthe
thelaboratory
laboratory
So,
So,the
thevalues
valuesobtain
obtainfrom
fromlab
labtest
testare
areknown
knownasasRotary
Rotarybeam
beamtest
testspecimen
specimenendurance limit,SSe’e.’ However
endurancelimit, . Howeverthere
there
isisaarelation
relationexist betweenSSe’e’ and
existbetween andSSutut. .
Value
Valueofofaamechanical
mechanicalororstructural
structuralmember
membertotomatch
matchthe
thevalues
valuesobtained
obtainedininthe
thelaboratory
laboratoryafterafterconsidering
considering
other
otherfactors
factorsthat
thatinfluence
influencethe
thefatigue
fatiguelife
lifeisisknown
knownas
asendurance limits,SSe e. .
endurancelimits,
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 13 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 14
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
Factors
Factorsthat
thatinfluence
influencethe
thefatigue
fatiguelife
lifeand
andendurance
endurancelimits.
limits.
AssumptionofofSSe’e’ value
Assumption valuefor
forsteel
steel
For
Forstudent
studentapplication:
application:
e 0.5SSutut →→ SSutut≤≤1400
SSe’ ’ ==0.5 1400MPa
MPa[[200
200kpsi
kpsi]]
SSe’ ’ ==700
e 700MPa
MPa[[100 kpsi]] →→ SSutut>>1400
100kpsi 1400MPa
MPa
For
Forreal
realengineering
engineeringpractice:
practice:
e 0.4SSutut →→ SSutut≤≤1400
SSe’ ’ ==0.4 1400MPa
MPa
SSe’ ’ ==550
550MPa
MPa[[84.1
84.1kpsi ]→ SSutut>>1400
kpsi]→ 1400MPa
MPa
e
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 15 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 16
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.6 – Endurance Limit Modifying Factors – cont… 4.6 – Endurance Limit Modifying Factors – cont…
Surface
SurfaceCondition
ConditionModification Factor,kkaa
ModificationFactor,
AAMarin
MarinEquation
Equationisistherefore
thereforewritten
writtenthe
theendurance limitSSeeas:
endurancelimit as:
The surface modification factor depends on the quality of the finish of the actual part surface
and on the tensile strength of the part material. The data can be represented by:
Se = kakbkckdkekfSe’ ka = a S but
where Sut is the ultimate strength and a and b value are to be found using below table
Where,
Where, TABLE 4-1: Parameters for Marin surface modification factor.
SSe’ =’ =rotary beam test endurance limit
e rotary beam test endurance limit
kka ==surface
surfacecondition
conditionmodification
modificationfactor
factor
Factor a Exponent
a Surface Finish
kkb ==size modification factor b
b size modification factor Sut, kpsi Sut, MPa
kkc ==load modification factor
c load modification factor Ground 1.34 1.58 -0.085
kkd ==temperature
temperature modification
modificationfactor
factor
d
kke ==reliability factor
e reliability factor
Machine or cold drawn 2.70 4.51 -0.265
kkf ==miscellaneous effect modification factor
f miscellaneous effect modification factor Hot-rolled 14.4 57.7 -0.718
As-forged 39.9 272 -0.995
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 17 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 18
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.6 – Endurance Limit Modifying Factors – cont… 4.6 – Endurance Limit Modifying Factors – cont…
Surface
SurfaceCondition
ConditionModification Factor,kkaa
ModificationFactor, Size Factor,kkbb
SizeFactor, - depends by the types of the load
EXAMPLE 1 Size factor for ROTATING ROUND bar is given by below equation :
A steel has a minimum ultimate strength of 520 MPa and a machined ⎧ (d / 0.3)−0.107 = 0.879d −0.107 0.11 ≤ d ≤ 2 in
surface. Estimate ka. ⎪ − 0.157 where
⎪ 0.91d 2 < d ≤ 10 in
kb = ⎨ − 0.107
d – effective dimension
⎪( d / 7.62) = 1.24d −0.107 2.79 ≤ d ≤ 51 mm
Solution ⎪ 1.51d −0.157 51 < d ≤ 254 mm
⎩
From Table 4–1, a = 4.51 and b =−0.265. Then,
For NONCIRCULAR CROSS SECTION , or NONROTATING ROUND BAR, the effective dimension de is:
Answer ka = 4.51(520)−0.265 = 0.860 D
de= 0.370d h de = 0.808 (hb)1/2
~~there
thereisisno
nosize
sizeeffect,
effect,so
sosize factorkkbb==1.0
sizefactor 1.0
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 19 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 20
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.6 – Endurance Limit Modifying Factors – cont… 4.6 – Endurance Limit Modifying Factors – cont…
Size Factor,kkbb
SizeFactor, Loading Factor,kkc c
LoadingFactor,
EXAMPLE 2
A steel shaft loaded in bending is 32 mm in diameter, abutting a filleted shoulder 38 mm in When
Whenfatigue
fatiguetests
testsare
arecarried
carriedout
outwith
withrotating
rotatingbending,
bending,axial
axial
diameter. The shaft material has a mean ultimate tensile strength of 690 MPa.
(push-pull),
(push-pull), and torsional loading, the endurancelimits
and torsional loading, the endurance limitsdiffer
differ
Estimate the Marin size factor kb if the shaft is used in
(a) A rotating mode. withSSutut..Here
with Hereare
arethe
thevalues
valuesof
ofthe
theload
loadfactor
factoras
as
(b) A nonrotating mode.
Solution
(a)
⎛ d ⎞
−0.107
⎛ 32 ⎞
−0.107 ⎧ 1 Bending
kb = ⎜ ⎟ =⎜ ⎟ = 0.858 ⎪
⎝ 7.62 ⎠ ⎝ 7.62 ⎠ kc = ⎨0.85 Axial
⎪0.59 Torsion
(b) de = 0.37d = 0.37(32) = 11.84 mm
⎩
−0.107
⎛ 11.84 ⎞
kb = ⎜ ⎟ = 0.954
⎝ 7.62 ⎠ ** If there is a combination of loads, use kc = 1
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 21 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 22
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.6 – Endurance Limit Modifying Factors – cont… 4.6 – Endurance Limit Modifying Factors – cont…
Temperature Factor,kkdd
TemperatureFactor, Temperature Factor,kkdd
TemperatureFactor,
If Se’ is known at room temperature, then use kd = ST / SRT .If not, compute the ultimate strength at the
EXAMPLE 3
elevated temperature obtained by using the factor from below table, then use kd = 1 A 1035 steel has a tensile strength of 70 kpsi and is to be used for a part that sees 450°F in service.
Estimate the Marin temperature modification factor and (Se)450◦ if
(a) The room-temperature endurance limit by test is (Se )70◦ = 39.0 kpsi
(b) Only the tensile strength at room temperature is known.
Effect of Operating
Temperature on the Tensile
Solution
Strength of Steel.*
(a) Interpolating from previous Table gives :
⎛ 450 − 400 ⎞
(ST = tensile strength at k d = (ST / S RT )450o = 1.018 + (0.995 − 1.018)⎜ ⎟ = 1.007
operating temperature; ⎝ 500 − 400 ⎠
Thus, (Se)450◦ = kd (Se )70◦ =1.007(39.0) = 39.3 kpsi
SRT = tensile strength at
room temperature; 0.099 ≤
(b) Since the rotating-beam specimen endurance limit is not known at room temperature, we determine the
ˆσ ≤ 0.110)
ultimate strength at the elevated temperature first, which the ultimate strength at 450° is
(Sut )450◦ = (ST /SRT )450◦(Sut )70◦= 1.007(70) = 70.5 kpsi
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 23 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 24
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.6 – Endurance Limit Modifying Factors – cont… 4.6 – Endurance Limit Modifying Factors – cont…
Reliability Factor,kkee
ReliabilityFactor, Miscellaneous-Effects Factor,kkf f
Miscellaneous-EffectsFactor,
the
thereliability
reliabilitymodification,
modification,kkeefactor
factorisiswritten
writtenas
as ke = 1 − 0.08 zα kkf factor is intended to account for the reduction in endurance limit due to all other
f factor is intended to account for the reduction in endurance limit due to all other
effects
effectssuch
suchas,as,Corrosion,
Corrosion,Electrolytic
ElectrolyticPlating,
Plating,Metal
MetalSpraying,
Spraying,Cyclic
CyclicFrequency,
Frequency,and
and
where zα values can be determined from Table A–10 in Appendix A. Table below gives other
othermore.
more.
reliability factors for some standard specified reliabilities.
However
Howeverthetheactual valuesofofkkf fare
actualvalues arenot
notalways
alwaysavailable.
available.IfIfthis
thisfactor
factorisisnot
notimportant,
important,
assume
assume; ;
kkf ==1.0
1.0
f
ItItisisreally
reallyintended
intendedas
asaareminder
reminderthat
thatthis
thisfactor
factormust
mustbe
beaccounted
accountedininreal
realengineering
engineering
practice.
practice.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.7 – Stress Concentration and Notch Sensitivity 4.7 – Stress Concentration and Notch Sensitivity – cont…
Department of Material and Engineering Design, Load lines at several types of bar 27 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 28
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, that has been suffered by axial force Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.7 – Stress Concentration and Notch Sensitivity – cont… 4.7 – Stress Concentration and Notch Sensitivity – cont…
thenKKf f==11→→material
IfIfqq==00, ,then materialhas
hasno
nosensitivity
sensitivityto
tonotches
notchesat
atall.
all.
IfIfqq==11, ,then
thenKKf =K
f =Kt →→material
t materialhas
hasfull
fullnotch
notchsensitivity.
sensitivity.
where
Kf is a reduced value of Kt and also known as
In analysis or design work :
fatigue stress-concentration factor.
Find Kt from geometry of the part Specify the material Find q Solve for Kf
σ0 is the nominal stress.
K f = 1 + q(K t − 1) or K fs = 1 + qshear (K ts − 1)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 29 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 30
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.7 – Stress Concentration and Notch Sensitivity – cont… 4.7 – Stress Concentration and Notch Sensitivity – cont…
Notch sensitivity q Notch sensitivity q for torsion load
for bending and axial load
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 31 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 32
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.7 – Stress Concentration and Notch Sensitivity – cont… 4.7 – Stress Concentration and Notch Sensitivity – cont…
• If there is any doubt about the true value of q, it is always safe to use Kf = Kt . EXAMPLE 4
• The notch sensitivity of the cast irons is very low, varying from 0 to about 0.20, A steel shaft in bending has an ultimate strength of 690 MPa and a shoulder with a fillet radius of 3 mm
depending upon the tensile strength. To be on the conservative side, it is connecting a 32-mm diameter with a 38-mm diameter. Estimate Kf using:
(a) Figure 4-1.
recommended that the value q = 0.20 be used for all grades of cast iron. (b) Equations (6–33) and (6–35).
• Figure 4–1 has as its basis the Neuber equation, which is given by
Kt − 1 Solution
K f = 1+ From Fig. A–15–9, using D/d = 38/32 = 1.1875, r/d = 3/32 = 0.09375, we read the graph to find Kt = 1.65.
1+ a / r
(a) From Fig. 4–1, for Sut = 690 MPa and r = 3 mm, q = 0.84. Thus, from Eq.
• where a is defined as the Neuber constant and is a material constant.
• Then notch sensitivity equation become q = 1 Kf = 1 + q (Kt − 1)
a = 1 + 0.84(1.65 − 1)
1+ = 1.55
r
• For steel, with Sut in kpsi, the Neuber constant can be approximated by a third-order (b) From below Eq. with Sut = 690 MPa = 100 kpsi,
polynomial fit of data as a = 0.246 - 3.08(10-3 )100 + 1.51(10-5 )100 2 - 2.67(10-8 )1003
-3 -5 2 -8 3
9Bending or Axial: a = 0.246 - 3.08(10 )Sut + 1.51(10 )S - 2.67(10 )S ut ut
= 0.0622 in = 0.313 mm
Kt −1 1.65 − 1
9Torsion: a = 0.190 - 2.51(10-3 )Sut + 1.35(10-5 )S2ut - 2.67(10-8 )S3ut Substituting this into next Eq. with r = 3 mm gives K f = 1+ = 1+ = 1.55
1+ a / r 0.313
1+
3
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 33 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 34
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
Sut
(log f ) / 3
S f = S ut N
fSut Figure 4–3
Fatigue strength fraction, f,
of Sut at 103 cycles for
S f = aN b
Se = Se’ = 0.5Sut .
Low cycle,
Finite life
( f Sut ) 2 High cycle,
Se If Sut < 70 kpsi (490 MPa),
a= Finite life
Se let f = 0.9
High Cycle,
1 ⎛ f Sut ⎞
b = − log⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ Infinite Life
3 ⎝ Se ⎠
100 103 106
Department of Material and Engineering Design, Number of stress cycle (N) 35 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 36
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
EXAMPLE 5
Solution
Given a 1050 HR steel, estimate (c) With S’f = 385 MPa,
(a) From Table A–20, Sut = 620 MPa.
(a) the rotating-beam endurance limit at 106 cycles.
∴ Se’ = 0.5(630) = 310 MPa 1/ b 1 / − 0.0785
(b) the endurance strength of a polished rotating-beam specimen corresponding to 104 cycles to failure ⎛ S' f ⎞ ⎛ 385 ⎞
(c) the expected life of a polished rotating-beam specimen under a completely reversed stress of 385 MPa.
N = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ =⎜ ⎟
⎝ a ⎠ ⎝ 917 ⎠
(b) From Fig. 4–3, for Sut = 620 MPa, f .= 0.86.
Fatigue stress Sf
Sut = 63.3(103 ) cycles
fSut
a=
[0.86(620)] 2
= 917
Sf 310
1
b = − log
[0.86(620 )] = −0.0785
Se 3 310
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
Fluctuating stresses in machinery often take the form of sinusoidal pattern In periodic patterns exhibiting a single maximum and single minimum of force,
because of the nature of the nature of some rotating machinery. the shape of the wave is not important.
Other patterns some quite irregular do occur. The peaks on both sides (maximum, minimum) are important.
Fmax and Fmin in a cycle can be used to characterize the force pattern.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 39 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 40
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.9 – Characterizing Fluctuating Stresses – cont… 4.9 – Characterizing Fluctuating Stresses – cont…
Stress
Some σa
Somestress-time
stress-timerelations:
relations: σr
9 Stress Range
σa
σmax
σm 9 Mean (Midrange Stress)
Stress
(R>0 )
σmin
Time
Time
(d) sinusoidal fluctuating stress 9 Stress Amplitude
(a) fluctuating stress with highfrequency ripple (Alternating Stress)
Stress
(R =0)
Stress
σa
σr 9 Stress Ratio
Time σmax σa σm
σmin = 0 Time
(b) nonsinusoidal fluctuating stress (e) repeated stress 9 Amplitude Ratio
Stress
Stress
(R =-1)
σmax
Time σa
Time σr
σm = 0 σa
σmin
(c) nonsinusoidal fluctuating stress (f) Completely reversed sinusoidal stress
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 41 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 42
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
4.9 – Characterizing Fluctuating Stresses – cont… 4.9 – Characterizing Fluctuating Stresses – cont…
For
Foraacase
casethat
thatinvolved
involvedfluctuating
fluctuatingbending
bendingstress
stressor
orfluctuating
fluctuatingshear
shear
stress
stressin
inthe
thepresent
presentofofaanotch,
notch,the
theequation
equationfor
foramplitude
amplitudeand
andmean
meanstress
stress
have
havebecome:
become:
σ a = K f σ ao and σ m = K f σ mo
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 43 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 44
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
For
Foraacase
casethat
thatinvolved
involvedcombinations
combinationsof ofdifferent
differenttypes
typesof
ofloading,
loading,such
suchas
as
combined
combinedbending,
bending,torsion,
torsion,and
andaxial.
axial. σa σm 1 2
⎛ nσ a ⎞ ⎛ nσ m ⎞
2
Soderberg + = Asme-elliptic ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ =1
Se Sy n ⎜ ⎟
⎝ Se ⎠ ⎝ S y ⎠
2
(σ a ) axial ⎤
σa=
' ⎡
[
⎢( K f ) bending (σ a ) bending + ( K f ) axial 0.85 ⎥ + 3 ( K fs ) torsion (τ a ) torsion ] 2
⎣ ⎦ σa σm 1 Sy
Modified-Goodman + = Larger static yield σa +σm =
Se Sut n n
2
For
Fortorsion
torsion(shear)
(shear)load loadonly.
nσ a ⎛ nσ m ⎞ only.
Gerber +⎜ ⎟ =1 Use
Usethethesame
sameequations
equationsas asapply
applyforforσσmm≥≥ 0,0,
S e ⎜⎝ S ut ⎟⎠ except replace σmm and σa a withττmmand
except replace σ and σ with andττa a, ,use
use
kkc ==0.59 forSSe e, ,replace
0.59for replaceSSututwith
withSSsusu==0.67
0.67SSutut
c
and replace S wih S = 0.577
and replace Sy wih Ssy = 0.577Sy . S .
y sy y
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 45 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 46
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
Figure 4–4 Table 4–1 Amplitude and Steady Coordinates of Strength and Important Intersections in
First Quadrant for Modified Goodman and Langer Failure Criteria
Intersection of static
and fatigue criterion
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 47 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 48
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 49 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 50
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 4 – Fatigue Design Failure of Theories
At the end of this topic, the students would be able to apply and
appreciate the knowledge to:
BDA 31203 Notes – Mechanical Component Design
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 3 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 4
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
SPUR GEAR
• Spur Gear
• Helical Gear • have teeth parallel to the axis of
rotation.
• Bevel Gear • used to transmit rotary motion
between parallel shafts.
• Worm Gear
• the simplest gear.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 5 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 6
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 7 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 8
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 9 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 10
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
• have teeth that are both curved • Have teeth which are curved along
along their (the tooth's) length; and their length, but not angled.
set at an angle, analogously to the
way helical gear teeth are set at an • Permissible axial thrust load are not
angle compared to spur gear teeth. large as those for the spiral bevel
gear
• Recommended for higher speeds
and where the noise level is an
important consideration.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 11 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 12
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 13 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 14
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 15 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 16
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
5.3 – Nomenclature of Spur Gear – cont… 5.3 – Nomenclature of Spur Gear – cont…
• Pitch circle – is a theoretical circle • Module (m) – is the ratio of the pitch
upon which all calculations are diameter to the number of teeth.
usually based.
Dp
• Pitch diameter (Dp) – is a diameter m= (mm)
of pitch circle N
• Circular pitch (pc)– is the distance, • Addendum (a) – is a radial distance
from a point on one tooth to a between the top land and the pitch
corresponding point on an adjacent circle.
tooth (measured on the pitch circle). 1
a=m ; (mm or inch)
πD p π Pd
pc = ; (mm or inch)
N Pd • Dedendum (b) – is the radial
distance from the bottom land to the
• Diametral pitch (Pd) – is the ratio of pitch circle.
the number of teeth on the gear to N 1.25
the pitch diameter. Pd = (Teeth per inch) b = 1.25m ; (mm or
inch)
Pd This is a commonly used sizes for spur gear
Dp tooth. Refer tooth system for more info.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 17 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 18
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
• Whole Depth (ht) – is the radial It is necessary that you actually be able to draw the teeth on a pair of meshing gear to obtain an understanding of the
problem involved in the meshing of the mating teeth.
distance from the bottom land to the
pitch circle. First – Draw the circle of gear layout
c =b−a (mm or inch) v) Next, on each gear, draw a circle tangent to the
pressure line which known as base circle
or radius of base gear is, rb = r cos φ
• Backlash – is the amount by which
vi) Then, draw the addendum and dedendum circle
the width of a tooth space exceeds
the thickness of the engaging tooth for addendum diameter, d a = d + 2a
measured on the pitch circles. for dedendum diameter, d b = d − 2b
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 19 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 20
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
Milling • Is a standard that specifies the relationships involving addendum, dedendum, working
• Gear teeth may be cut with a milling cutter shaped to conform to depth, tooth thickness and pressure angle.
the tooth space.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 23 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 24
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. Hobbing University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 25 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 26
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
• Consist of multiple gears in the train, as shown in the two figures below : • To calculate overall gear or speed ratio from multiple gearing system
To ni 1
Overall Gear Ratio; mG -O = = =
Ti no e
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 27 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 28
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
Train nL 19.7
Department of Material and Engineering Design, Train value, e = ? 29 Department of Material and Engineering Design, e= = = 0.00985 30
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
value, nF 2000
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
rb (gear)
Base circle (gear) ra (gear)
Dedendum circle (gear)
eL
ine Pitch circle (gear)
s su r
Pre
Addendum circle (gear)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 31 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 32
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
2 2 2 2
ra1 − rb1 + ra 2 − rb 2 − CD sin φ
CR = • Causing the involute tip or face of the
pc cos φ where
ra = addendum circle radius driven gear tends to dig out the
Department of Material and Engineering Design, rb = base circle radius 33 Department of Material and Engineering Design, noninvolute flank of the driver. 34
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, CD = center distance of the gear Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
• To avoid interference – ones has to calculate smallest number of pinion teeth can
exist without interference is NP where NP is:-
2k ⎛ m + m 2 + (1 + 2m ) sin 2 φ ⎞
NP = ⎜ G 2 ⎟ For spur pinion
(1 + 2mG ) sin φ ⎝ ⎠
G G
Where:
2k cosψ ⎛ m + m 2 + (1 + 2m ) sin 2 φ ⎞
NP = ⎜ G t ⎟ For helical pinion
(1 + 2mG ) sin 2 φt ⎝ ⎠
G G
Where:
ψ = helix angle
2k cosψ
NP = For helical pinion that operate with a rack
φt = tangential pressure angle
sin 2 φt (refer slide 44)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 35 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 36
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
5.11 – Force Analysis (Spur Gear) – cont… 5.11 – Force Analysis (Spur Gear) – cont…
Gear r
F 32 F32
3 Tb3 Fb3 t
F 32 English unit SI unit
n3 φ n2
b
Ta2
πdn πdn
b 3 t
F a2 a V= V=
12 60
r
F a2 2
φ
φ
2 Fa2
Wt = 33000
H 60000 H
F23 F32 d2 Wt =
n2
a
φ (c) V πdn
Ta2
Pinion Gear force have been resolved into V = pitch-line velocity, ft/min V = pitch-line velocity, mm/s
a tangential and radial components.
(a) Wt = transmitted load, Ibf Wt = transmitted load, kN
Fa2 2 T d = gear diameter, in d = gear diameter, mm
Shows a pinion mounted Wt = F32t =
on a shaft a rotating d /2 n = gear speed, rev/min n = gear speed, rev/min
clockwise at n2 rev/min (b)
and driving a gear on a
Free body diagrams of the forces and moments Wr = F32r = Wt tan φ H = power, hp H = power, kW
shaft b at n3 rev/min
acting upon two gears of a simple gear train.
r W
Department of Material and Engineering Design, W = F32 = t 37 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 38
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, kosφ Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
5.11 – Force Analysis (Spur Gear) – cont… 5.11 – Force Analysis (Spur Gear) – cont…
summarizes that below are the info given : shown in free body diagram figure, Therefore
n = 1750 rpm
F23r = F23r tan 20 o = 0.546 tan 20 o = 0.199 kN
H = 2.5 kW
and so
φ = 20o FREE BODY
DIAGRAM F23t 0.546
F23 = = = 0.581 kN
m = 2.5 cos 20o cos 20o
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 39 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 40
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
5.11 – Force Analysis (Spur Gear) – cont… 5.12 – Force Analysis (Bevel Gear)
Since gear 3 is idler, it transmits no power (torque) to its shaft, and so the tangential reaction of
Pinion pitch angle :
gear 4 on gear 3 is also equal to Wt. Therefore
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 41 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 42
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears
5.12 – Force Analysis (Bevel Gear) – cont… 5.13 – Force Analysis (Helical Gear)
Transmitted load :
y
T Normal circular pitch pn = pt cosψ
Wt = Represent a
rav x portion of top
pt
Wt
view of a helical
Axial pitch px =
where rack
tanψ
• T is the torque
• rav is the pitch radius at the midpoint W φ rav
5.13 – Force Analysis (Helical Gear) – cont… 5.13 – Force Analysis (Helical Gear) – cont…
A stock helical gear has a normal pressure angle of 20o, a helix angle of 25o and a pn = pt cosψ = 15.71cos 25o = 14.24 mm
transverse module of 5.0 mm and has 18 teeth. Find:
(a) The pitch diameter
pt 15.71
(b) The transverse, the normal and the axial pitch px = = = 33.69 mm
tanψ tan 25o
(c) The normal module
(d) The transverse pressure angle
pn 14.24
(c) mn = = = 4.53 mm or mn = mt cosψ = 5 cos 25o = 4.53 mm
π π
Solution 5-3
⎛ tan φn ⎞ ⎛ tan 20o ⎞
(a) d = Nmt = 18(5) = 90 mm (d) φt = tan −1 ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = tan −1 ⎜⎜ ⎟ = 21.88o
o ⎟
⎝ cosψ ⎠ ⎝ cos 25 ⎠
(b) pt = πmt = π (5) = 15.71 mm
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 45 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 46
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
Wr = W sin φn
Wt = W cos φn cosψ
Wa = W cos φn sinψ
where
• W = total force
• Wv = radial component
• Wt = tangential component, also called
transmitted load
• Wa = axial component, also called thrust load
• φn = normal pressure angle
Week 7 & 8
9 analyses and design of spur and helical gears to resist
Chapter 5 bending failure of the teeth as well as pitting failure of
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
GEAR FAILURE
In this chapter, generally we will learn:-
learn:-
• 5.14 - Introduction
• 5.15 - Lewis Bending Equation Teeth Bending Tooth Surface
• 5.16 - Surface Durability Failure Pitting Failure
Occur when significant tooth stress Occur when significant contact
• 5.17 - AGMA Stress Equations equals or exceeds either the yield stress equals or exceeds the
strength or bending endurance strength. surface endurance strength.
• 5.18 - AGMA Strength Equations
• 5.19 - Safety Factors SF and SH Gear Standard and Quality
• AGMA (American Gear Manufacturers Association)
• BGA (British Gear Association)
• JGMA (Japanese Gear Manufacturers Association)
• EUROTRANS (European Committee of Associations of Manufacturers of Gears and Transmission Parts)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 3 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 4
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
W t Pd
σ= (U.S. customary units)
FY
Where;
t Wt = transmitted force (Ibf or N)
W
σ= (SI units)
Pd = diametral pitch (teeth per inch)
FmY m = module (mm)
F = width of gear tooth (inch or mm)
Y = Lewis form factor (dimensionless)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 5 Department of Material and Engineering Design, (refer Table 5-3) 6
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.15 – Lewis Bending Equation – cont… 5.15 – Lewis Bending Equation – cont…
Table 5-3: Values of the Lewis Form Factor Y
Number of
Y
Number
Y Dynamic Effects, Kv US customary units SI units
Teeth of Teeth
(Velocity in feet per (Velocity in meters
12 0.245 28 0.353 (These Values are for a Normal Pressure Angle • Present when a pair of minute) per second)
13 0.261 30 0.359 of 20o, Full Depth Teeth, and a Diametral Pitch gears is driven at
14 0.277 34 0.371 of Unity in the Plane of Rotation) moderate or high speed Cast iron, cast 600 + V 3.05 + V
Kv = Kv =
15 0.290 38 0.384 and noise is generated. profile
600 3.05
Lewis Form Factor, Y also can be calculate by
16 0.296 43 0.397 • Gear under dynamic 6.1 + V
using this formula:- Cut or milled 1200 + V Kv =
17 0.303 50 0.409 loading; Kv =
profile
1200 6.1
2xP
18 0.309 60 0.422
Y=
19 0.314 75 0.435 3 50 + V 3.56 + V
K vW t Pd Hobbed or
Kv = Kv =
20 0.322 100 0.447 Where; σ= (U.S. customary
units)
shaped profile
50 3.56
21 0.328 150 0.460 x = distance refer figure slide 6
FY
P = diametral pitch (teeth per inch) Shaved or 78 + V 5.56 + V
22 0.331 300 0.472
K Wt Kv = Kv =
σ= v
ground profile
24 0.337 400 0.480
(SI units) 78 5.56
Interpolation for Y value is needed if number of
26 0.346 Rack 0.485 teeth is not in the table.
FmY ** Where V is the pitch line velocity
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 7 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 8
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.15 – Lewis Bending Equation – cont… 5.15 – Lewis Bending Equation – cont…
Example Solution
Solution5-4
5-4- -cont…
Example5-4
5-4 cont…
A stock spur gear is available having a module of 3mm, a 38-mm face, 16 teeth, and a The pitch diameter is, D p = mN = 3(16) = 48 mm
pressure angle of 20o with full-depth teeth. The material is AISI 1020 steel in as-rolled
condition. Use a design factor of nd = 3 to rate the power output of the gear
So the pitch velocity is, V = πdn = π (0.048)(20) = 3.02 m/s
corresponding to a speed of 20 rev/s and moderate applications.
6.1 + V 6.1 + 3.02
Velocity factor is found to be, Kv = = = 1.5
6.1 6.1
Solution
Solution5-4
5-4 mFYσ allow
So the transmitted force is, Wt = where Y = 0.296 for 16 teeth
Kv
The term moderate applications seems to imply that the gear can be rated by using the
yield strength as a criterion of failure. From table A-20 in appendix, we find Sut = 380 MPa 0.003(0.038)0.296(68.7)106
and Sy = 210 MPa. A design factor of 3 means that the allowable bending stress is
Wt = = 1545.5 N
1.5
Sy 210
σ allowable = = = 70.0 MPa The power that can be transmitted is, H = W tV = 1545.5(3.02) = 4667 W
nd 3 This is a rough estimation, and that this approach must not be used for important application
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 9 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 10
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
Because a gear tooth experiences into and out engagement ⇒ causes contact Surface Compressive stress (Hertzian stress), σC
stress ⇒ wear and pitting 1/ 2
9 Wear depends on surface hardness ⎡ K W t ⎛ 1 1 ⎞⎤
σ c = −C p ⎢ ν ⎜⎜ + ⎟⎟⎥
Pitting ⇒ small particles are removed due to high contact stress in gear ⎣ F cos φ ⎝ r1 r2 ⎠⎦
Where;
Prolong operation after pitting
Cp = elastic coefficient
⇒ roughen (deteriorate) the teeth surface and Kν = dynamic or velocity factor
causing failure Wt = transmitted force (Ibf or N)
F = width of gear tooth (inch or mm)
To prevent pitting ⇒ computed contact stress in the gear must not exceed the φ = Pressure angle d P sin φ
allowable contact stress given by manufacturer. r1 = radii of curvature on the pinion profile ⇒ r1 =
2
d G sin φ
r2 = radii of curvature on the gear tooth profile ⇒ r2 =
Other factors can also be included in the contact stress calculation, namely: 2
reliability factor, velocity factor, size factor, etc.
Sign is negative because σC is a compressive stress.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 11 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 12
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
Example Solution
Solution5-5
5-5- -cont…
Example5-5
5-5 cont…
1/ 2
⎡ ⎤
⎢ ⎥
The pinion of Examples 5-4 is to be mated with a 50-tooth gear manufactured of ASTM 1
Calculated the elastic coefficient as Cp = ⎢ ⎥ = 150927.3
No. 50 cast iron. Using the tangential load of 1700N, estimate the factor of safety of the ⎢ ⎛ 1 − (0.292) 2 1 − (0.211) 2 ⎞ ⎥
⎢ π ⎜⎜ + ⎟ ⎥
drive based on the possibility of a surface fatigue failure. ⎣ ⎝ 207(10 )
9
100(109 ) ⎟⎠ ⎦
From Table A-5 The gear pitch diameter is, d G = mN G = 3(50) = 150 mm
EP = 207 GPa
EG = 100 GPa Then the radii curvature of the tooth profiles at the pitch point.
νP = 0.292
48 sin 20 150 sin 20
νG = 0.211 rP = = 8.2 mm rG = = 25.7 mm
2 2
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 15 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 16
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
Solution
Solution5-5
5-5- -cont…
cont… 2 fundamental stress equations
• Bending stress Where ;
Wt = tangential transmitted load (ibf or N)
The face width is given as F = 38 mm. Use Kν = 1.5 from example 5-4. Substituting all ⎧ t Pd K m K B (U.S.
Ko = overload factor
these values to calculate contact stress as: ⎪⎪W K o K v K s F J
customary
units) Kv = dynamic factor
σ =⎨ Ks = size factor
⎡ 1.5(1700) ⎛ 1 1 ⎞⎤
1/ 2
⎪W t K o K v K s 1 Km KB Pd = transverse diameteral pitch
σ c = −150927.3 ⎢ o ⎜
+ ⎟⎥ = −511.5 MPa (SI units)
⎩⎪
F = face width (in or mm)
⎣ 0.038 cos 20 ⎝ 0.0082 0.0257 ⎠⎦ Fmt J Km = load distribution factor
KB = rim thickness factor
The surface endurance strength of cast iron can be estimated from S c = 2.206 H B MPa J = geometry factor for bending strength
mt = transverse metric module
∴ S c = 2.206(262) = 578 MPa
• Pitting resistance (contact stress)
From table A24, ASTM No. 50 cast iron ⇒ HB = 262
Where ;
Km C f
σ c = C p W t Ko Kv K s
(U.S. Cp = elastic coefficient (√ ibf/in2 or √ N/mm2)
2 2 customary or
loss _ of _ function _ load S ⎛ 578 ⎞ Cf = surface condition factor (still not been
n= = =⎜ ⎟ = 1.28
C
d pF I SI units) establish) used Cf = 1
imposed _ load σ ⎝ 511.5 ⎠
2
C
dp = pitch diameter of the pinion (in or mm)
I = geometry factor for pitting resistance
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 17 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 18
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont… 5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont…
5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont… 5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont…
Size Factor, Ks
The size factor reflects nonuniformity of material properties due to size. It depends upon
¾ Tooth size
¾ Diameter of part
¾ Ratio of tooth size to diameter of part
¾ Face width
¾ Area of stress pattern
¾ Ratio of case depth to tooth size
¾ Hardenability and heat treatment
AGMA size factor equation :
0.0535
⎛F Y ⎞
( )
0.0535
K s = 1.192⎜⎜ ⎟
(U.S.
⎟ customary K s = 0.904 Fm Y (SI units)
⎝ Pd ⎠ units)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 21 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 22
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont… 5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont…
5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont… 5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont…
Condition A B C
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 25 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 26
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont… 5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont…
5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont… 5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont…
If the rim thickness is not sufficient to provide full support for the tooth root, the location of
bending fatigue failure may be through the gear rim rather than at the tooth fillet.
⎧ 2.242
⎪1.6 ln mB < 1.2
KB = ⎨ mB
⎪1
⎩ mB ≥ 1.2
tR
mB = Figure 5-4: Rim thickness factor KB
ht
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 29 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 30
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont… 5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont…
Figure 5-5: Spur-gear geometry factors J. Figure 5-6: Helical-gear geometry factors J.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 31 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 32
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont… 5.17 – AGMA Stress Equation – cont…
⎧ cos φt sin φt mG mN =
pN and p N = pn cos φn
external gears
⎪⎪ 2m mG + 1 0.95Z
I =⎨ N
cos φt sin φt mG where
⎪ internal gears
⎪⎩ 2mN mG − 1 PN = Normal base pitch
Pn = Normal circular pitch
where:
φn = Normal pressure angle
mN = Load sharing ratio ( = 1 for spur gear)
Z = Length line of action in transverse plane.
mG = Gear ratio (never less than 1) (distance Lab in slide chapter 9 page 35)
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
where
Both allowable stress numbers (strength) are for: St = Gear bending strength, Ibf/in2 (MPa) (refer Figs. 5-8, 5-9, 5-10 and Tables 5-7, 5,8)
9 Unidirectional loading YN = Stress cycle factor for bending stress (refer Figs. 5-12)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 35 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 36
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont… 5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont…
⎧ Sc Z N CH
⎪⎪ S KT K R
(U.S. customary units)
σ c ,all ⎨ H
S Z N ZW
⎪ c (SI units)
⎪⎩ S H Yθ YZ
where
Sc = Contact fatigue strength, Ibf/in2 (MPa) (refer Fig. 5-11 and Tables 5-9, 5,10, 5-11)
CH (ZW) = Hardness ratio factors for pitting resistance (used for gear only) (refer Figs. 5-14 & 5-15)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 37 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 38
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont… 5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont…
(Source: ANSI/AGMA
2001-D04 and 2101-D04.)
Figure 5-9: Allowable bending stress number for nitrided through-hardened steels gears (i.e., AISI 4140, 4340) St.
The SI equations are St = 0.568HB + 83.8 MPa, grade 1, and St = 0.749 HB + 110 MPa, grade 2.
(Source: ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04 and 2101-D04.)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 39 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 40
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont… 5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont…
Table 5-7: Repeatedly Applied Bending Strength St at 107 Cycles and 0.99 Reliability for Steel Gears
Source: ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04
Table 5-8: Repeatedly Applied Bending Strength St for Iron and Bronze Gears at 107 Cycles and 0.99 Reliability
Minimum Allowable Bending Stress Number, St2 Source: ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 41 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 42
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont… 5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont…
31 Cr Mo V 9 1100 975 58 - 62 27 - 33
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 43 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 44
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont… 5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont…
Table 5-10: Repeatedly Applied Contact Strength Sc at 107 Cycles and 0.99 Reliability for Steel Gears
Source: ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04
Table 5-11: Repeatedly Applied Contact Strength Sc for Iron and Bronze Gears at 107 Cycles and 0.99 Reliability
Minimum Allowable Contact Stress Number, Sc2 Source: ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 45 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 46
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont… 5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont…
Stress Cycle Factor for Bending Stress, YN Stress Cycle Life Factor, ZN
Figure 5-13:
Pitting resistance stress-cycle
Figure 5-12: factor ZN.
Repeatedly applied bending (Source: ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04)
strength stress-cycle factor YN.
(Source: ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 47 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 48
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont… 5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont…
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont… 5.18 – AGMA Strength Equation – cont…
KR (YZ)
Reliability
K T = Yθ = 1
0.9999 1.50
0.999 1.25
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 51 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 52
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
Refer also roadmap given in the Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design book (9th edition):
Safety factor SF guarding against bending failure:
• Roadmap of spur gear bending equations based on AGMA standards in U.S. customary units. (ANSI/AGMA 2001-
fully corrected bending strength S t YN /( K T K R ) D04) – Figure 14-17 page 766
SF = =
bending stress σ • Roadmap of spur gear wear equations based on AGMA standards in U.S. customary units. (ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04)
– Figure 14-17 page 767
• Roadmap of spur gear bending equations based on AGMA standards in SI units. (ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04) – Figure
B-1 page 1061
Safety factor SH guarding against pitting failure:
• Roadmap of spur gear wear equations based on AGMA standards in SI units. (ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04) – Figure B-2
SH * = = • Roadmap summary of principal straight-bevel gear wear equations and their parameters in U.S. customary units.
contact stress σc (ANSI/AGMA 2003-B97). – Figure 15-14 page 801
• Roadmap summary of principal straight-bevel gear bending equations and their parameters in U.S. customary units.
(ANSI/AGMA 2003-B97). . – Figure 15-15 page 802
* Important: • Roadmap summary of principal straight-bevel gear wear equations and their parameters based on AGMA standards
in SI units. – Figure B-3 page 1063
When deciding whether bending or wear is the threat to function, compare SF with S2H. For
• Roadmap summary of principal straight-bevel gear bending equations and their parameters based on AGMA
crowned gears compare SF with S3H.
standards in SI units. – Figure B-4 page 1064
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 53 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 54
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
Roadmap of Gear Analysis (Spur Gear Bending) Roadmap of Gear Analysis (Spur Gear Wear)
AGMA standards in U.S. customary units. (ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04) AGMA standards in U.S. customary units. (ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04)
Slide 47 Slide 48 Slide 49
(Gear only)
Slide 38 ~ 42 Slide 43 ~ 46
N
dP = P
πdn N
dP = P
πdn
V= Gear V= Gear
Pd 12 bending S YN Pd 12 contact Sc Z N CH
endurance σ all = t (slide 36) endurance σ c, all = (slide 37)
strength S F KT K R 33000 H strength S H KT K R
33000 H equation W = t
equation
Wt = Slide 29, 30 1 if T < 250o F
V 1
1 if T < 250o F
V
Slide 13, 14 Slide 23
Slide 23 Slide 52 Slide 52
Gear Gear
Pd K m K B ⎛ t K C ⎞
bending
stress
σ = W t Ko Kv Ks (slide 18) contact
stress
σ c = Cp ⎜⎜W K o K v K s m f ⎟⎟ (slide 18) Gear only
equation
F J
equation
⎝ dP F I ⎠
Wear
Bending
S t YN /( K T K R ) S c Z N C H /( K T K R )
Slide 19 factor of SF = (slide 53) Slide 19 factor SH = (slide 53)
safety σ Slide 34 of σc
Slide 20, 21 Slide 31 (Spur Gear) Slide 20, 21 safety
Slide 22 Slide 32, 33 (Helix gear) Slide 22
Remember when deciding whether bending or wear is the threat to function, compare SF with S2H. Remember when deciding whether bending or wear is the threat to function, compare SF with S2H.
For crowned gears compare SF with S3H. For crowned gears compare SF with S3H.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 55 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 56
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
Example
Example5-6
5-6 Solution
Solution5-6
5-6
A 17-tooth 20o pressure angle spur pinion rotates at 1800 rev/min and transmits 4 hp to a 52-tooth There will be many term to obtain, so use roadmap in slide 54 & 55 as guides to what is needed:
disk gear. The diametral pitch is 10 teeth/in, the face width 1.5 in, and the quality standard is No. 6.
d P = N P / Pd = 17 / 10 = 1.7 in 0.8255
The gears are straddle-mounted with bearings immediately adjacent. The pinion is grade 1 steel with ⎛ 59.77 + 801.1 ⎞
a hardness of 240 Brinell tooth surface through-hardened core. The gear is steel, through-hardened Kv = ⎜ ⎟ = 1.377
d G = 52 / 10 = 5.2 in ⎜ 59.77 ⎟
also, grade 1 material, with a Brinell hardness of 200, tooth surface and core. Poisson’s ratio is 0.30, ⎝ ⎠
JP=0.30, JG=0.40, and Young’s modulus is 30(106) psi. The loading is smooth because of motor and πd P n P π (1.7)1800 To determine the size factor, Ks , the Lewis form
load. Assume a pinion life of 108 cycles and a reliability of 0.90, and use YN=1.3558N -0.0178, V= = = 801.1 ft/min factor is needed. From table 5-3, with NP = 17 teeth,
12 12
ZN=1.4488N -0.023. The tooth profile is uncrowned. This is a commercial enclosed gear unit. YP = 0.303. Interpolation for the gear with NG = 52
teeth yields YG = 0.412. Thus, with F = 1.5 in ,
33000 H 33000(4)
Wt = = = 164.8 ibf
a) Find the factor of safety of the gears in bending. V 801.1 0.0535
⎛ 0.303 ⎞⎟
b) Find the factor of safety of the gears in wear. Assuming uniform loading, Ko = 1. To evaluate Kv , (K s )P = 1.192⎜⎜ 1.5 + ⎟
= 1.043
with a quality number Qv = 6, ⎝ 10 ⎠
c) By examining the factors of safety, identify the threat to each gear and to the mesh.
B = 0.25(12 − 6) 2 / 3 = 0.8255 ⎛ 0.412 ⎞⎟
0.0535
(K s )G = 1.192⎜⎜ 1.5 + ⎟
= 1.052
A = 50 + 56(1 − 0.8255) = 59.77 ⎝ 10 ⎠
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 57 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 58
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
Solution
Solution5-6
5-6––cont…
cont… Solution
Solution5-6
5-6––cont…
cont…
The load distribution factor Km is determined where 5 Assuming constant thickness gears, the rim From table 5-4 (slide 14), CP = 2300 psi. Form figure 5-13 (slide 48) ;
terms are needed: They are thickness factor KB = 1. The speed ratio is
Next, the terms of gear endurance strength need to
C mc = 1 (uncrowned)
mG = NG / NP = 52 / 17 = 3.059.
be calculate. From table 5-7 (slide 41) for grade 1 (Z N )P = 1.4488 (10 8 ) −0.023 = 0.948
(C ) = 1.5 /[10(1.7)] − 0.0375 + 0.0125(1.5) = 0.0695
The load cycle factors given in the problem through-hardened steel with HB(P) = 240 and (Z N )G = 1.4488 (10 8 / 3.059 ) − 0.023 = 0.973
pf P
statement, with N (pinion) = 108 cycles and HB(G) = 200 select figure 5-8 (slide 38) ;
(C ) = 0.05 − 0.0375 + 0.0125(1.5) = 0.0313 N (gear) = 108 / mG = 108 / 3.059 cycles are:
(S t )P
pf G
= 77 .3( 240 ) + 12 ,800 = 31,350 psi For the hardness ratio factor CH, the hardness
C pm = 1 (Bearing immediately adjacent) ratio is HB(P) / HB(G) = 240/200 = 1.2. Then, from
C ma = 0.15 (Commercia l enclosed gear unit)
(YN ) P = 1.3558 (10 ) 8 −0.0178
= 0.977 (S t )G = 77 .3( 200 ) + 12 ,800 = 28 , 260 psi slide 49
Ce = 1 (YN ) G = 1.3558 (10 8 / 3.059 ) − 0.0178 = 0.996
Similarly, from table 5-10 (slide 45), use figure 10-11 A' = 8 .98 (10 −3 )(1 .2 ) − 8 .29 (10 −3 ) = 0 .00249
(K m )P = 1 + C mc ( C pf C pm + C ma C e ) From table 5-12 (slide 52), with a reliability of 0.9, (slide 43)
KR = 0.85, From slide 56, the temperature and ∴ C H = 1 + 0 .00249 (3 .059 − 1) = 1 .005
= 1 + 1[ 0 . 0695 (1) + 0 . 15 (1)]
surface condition factor; KT = 1 & Cf = 1. From slide (S c )P = 322 ( 240 ) + 29 ,100 = 106 , 400 psi
= 1 . 22
34, with mN = 1 for spur gears; (S c )G = 322 ( 200 ) + 29 ,100 = 93 ,500 psi
(K m )G = 1 . 18
cos 20 sin 20 3.059
o o
Department of Material and Engineering Design, I= = 0.121 59 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 60
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, 2 3.059 + 1 Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 61 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 62
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
Example
Example5-7
5-7 Solution
Solution5-7
5-7
All of the parameters in this example are the same as in example 5-6 with the exception that we are
A 17-tooth 20o normal pitch-angle helical pinion with a right hand helix angle of 30o rotates at 1800 using helical gears. Thus, several terms will be the same as example 5-6. The reader should verify that
rev/min and transmits 4 hp to a 52-tooth helical gear. The normal diametral pitch is 10 teeth/in, the the following terms remain unchanged: Ko = 1, YP = 0.303, YG = 0.412, mG = 3.059, (Ks)P = 1.043,
face width 1.5 in, and the set has a quality number of 6. The gears are straddle-mounted with (Ks)G = 1.052, (YN)P = 0.977, (YN)G = 0.996, KR = 0.85, KT = 1, Cf = 1, CP = 2300 √psi, (St)P = 31,350 psi,
bearings immediately adjacent. The pinion and gear are made from a through-hardened steel with (St)G = 28,260 psi, (Sc)P = 106,380 psi, (Sc)G = 93,500 psi, (ZN)P = 0.948, (ZN)G = 0.973 and CH = 1.005
surface and core hardnesses of 240 Brinell on the pinion and surface and core hardnessess of 200
Brinell on the gear. The transmission is smooth, connecting an electric motor and a centrifugal For helical gears, the transverse diametral pitch;
pump. Assume a pinion life of 108 cycles and a reliability of 0.90, and use the upper curve in Figs. 33000 H 33000(4)
10-12 and 10-13. Pt = Pn cosψ = 10(cos 30 o ) = 8.660 teeth/in Wt = = = 142.7 ibf
V 925
Thus the pitch diameters are dP = NP / Pt =
a) Find the factor of safety of the gears in bending. 17 / 8.660 =1.963 in and dG = 52 / 0.8660 = As in previous example; for the dynamic factor,
b) Find the factor of safety of the gears in wear. 6.005 in. The pitch line velocity and B = 0.8255 and A = 59.77. Thus
c) By examining the factors of safety, identify the threat to each gear and to the mesh. transmitted force are:
0.8255
⎛ 59.77 + 925 ⎞
πd P n P π (1.963)1800 Kv = ⎜ ⎟ = 1.404
V= = = 925 ft/min ⎜ 59.77 ⎟
12 12 ⎝ ⎠
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 63 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 64
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
Solution
Solution5-7
5-7––cont…
cont… Solution
Solution5-7
5-7––cont…
cont…
The geometry factor I for helical gears requires a Then the surface strength geometry factor The load sharing ratio : The load-distribution factor Km is estimated :
little work. First, the transverse pressure angle is
given by : ⎛ p ⎞ ⎛ 0.2952 ⎞ C mc = 1 (uncrowned)
Z = (0.9815 + 0.1) 2 − 0.9048 2 + m N = ⎜ N ⎟ = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = 0.6895
⎝ 0.95Z ⎠ ⎝ 0.95(0.4507 ) ⎠ (C ) =
1. 5
− 0.0375 + 0.0125(1.5) = 0.0577
⎛ tan φ n ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
⎟ = tan −1 ⎜ tan 20 (3.004 + 0.1) 2 − 2.769 2 10(1.963)
o pf P
−1 ⎜ ⎟ = 22.80 o
φt = tan ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ cos 30 o ⎟ The surface strength geometry factor :
⎝ cosψ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ − (0.9815 + 3.004) sin 22.80 o (C )
pf G = 0.05 − 0.0375 + 0.0125(1.5) = 0.0313
⎛ sin 22.80 o cos 22.80 o ⎞⎛ 3.06 ⎞
= 0.5924 + 1.4027 - 1.544.4 = 0.4507 in I =⎜ ⎟⎜ = 0.195
The radii of the pinion and gear are rP = 1.963 / 2 = ⎜ 2(0.6895) ⎟⎝ 3.06 + 1 ⎟⎠ C pm = 1 (Bearing immediately adjacent)
⎝ ⎠
0.9815 in and rG = 6.004 / 2 = 3.002 in. The
Since the first two terms are less than 1.5444, the C ma = 0.15 (Commercia l enclosed gear unit)
addendum is a = 1 / Pn = 1 / 10 = 0.1, and the base From slide 32, The geometry factors JP’ = 0.45 and
equation for Z stands. The normal base pitch pN is Ce = 1
circle radii of the pinion and gear are given by: JG’ = 0.54. Also from slide 33, the J-factor multipliers
π are 0.94 and 0.98, correcting JP’ and JG’ to: (K m )P = 1 + C mc ( C pf C pm + C ma C e )
(rb ) P = rP cos φt = 0.9815(cos 22.80 o ) = 0.9048 in ( p N ) = p n cos φ n = cos φ n
PN
J P = 0.45(0.94) = 0.423 = 1 + 1[ 0 . 0577 (1) + 0 . 15 (1)]
(rb ) G = rG cos φt = 3.002(cos 22.80 o ) = 2.767 in π
= cos 20 o = 0.2952 in J G = 0.54(0.98) = 0.529 = 1 . 208
10 (K m )G = 1 . 181
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 65 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 66
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II) BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 5 – Gears (Part II)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 67 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 68
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
At the end of this topic, the students would be able to apply and
appreciate the knowledge to:
BDA 31203 Notes – Mechanical Component Design
• select suitable material for shaft design
Week 9
• perform load, stress, and power calculations analytically as applied to
a shaft components.
Chapter 6 • design a shaft with some consideration on static and fatigue failure.
Shaft Design • do tolerance analysis and specify appropriate tolerances for shaft
design applications
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
What is shaft?!
• 6.1 - Introduction ~a rotating member,
usually of circular cross
• 6.2 - Shaft Materials section
• 6.3 - Shaft Layout
What it is used for?!
• 6.4 - Shaft Design for Stress
~to transmit power or
• 6.5 - Deflection Considerations motion
• 6.6 - Limits and Fits ~It provides the axis of
rotation, or oscillation, of
elements such as gears,
pulleys, flywheels, cranks
and the like, and controls
the geometry of their
motion.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 3 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 4
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
What is axle?!
What is spindle?!
An axle is a nonrotating member A spindle is a short shaft. Terms
that carries no torque and such as lineshaft, headshaft,
stub shaft, transmission shaft,
countershaft, and flexible shaft
are names associated with
What it is used for?!
special usage.
is used to support rotating
wheels, pulleys and etc.
Tapered roller bearings used in a
mowing-machine spindle. This design
Train wheels are affixed to a straight represents good practice for situations
axle, such that both wheels rotate in where one or more torque-transfer
unison. elements must be mounted outboard.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 5 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 6
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
• Geometric Layout • A good practice is to start with an inexpensive, low or medium carbon steel for the first
time through the design calculations.
• Stress and strength
• Deflection primarily controlled by geometry, not material.
– Static strength
• Stress controlled by geometry, not material.
– Fatigue strength
• Strength controlled by material property.
• Deflection and rigidity
– Bending deflection • Shafts usually don’t need to be surface hardened unless they serve as the actual journal
of a bearing surface.
– Torsional deflection
– Slope at bearings and shaft-supported elements • Cold drawn steel typical for d < 3 in.
– Shear deflection due to transverse loading of short shafts • Hot rolled steel common for larger sizes. Should be machined all over.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 7 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 8
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
• For low production - turning is the suitable process (minimum material removal may be
design goal). • Issues to consider for
• For High production - Forming or casting is common where minimum material may be shaft layout
design goal. Cast iron may be specified if the production quantity is high, and the gears – Axial layout of
are to be integrally cast with the shaft. components
• Stainless steel may be appropriate for some environments – e.g. Involved in food – Supporting axial
processing. loads
– Providing for torque
transmission
– Assembly and
Disassembly
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 9 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 10
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
Axial
AxialLayout
LayoutofofComponents
Components Various
Variousmethod
methodtotoattach
attachelement
elementon
onshaft.
shaft.
clamp snap ring
collar
y Axial loads must be key taper pin
hub
supported through a shaft
hub
bearing
bearing to the bearing step
frame.
y Generally best for press
step step
step
tolerances and
prevents binding Assembly/Disassembly → progressively smaller diameter toward the ends
Axial clearance → to allow machinery vibration
Keys/pins/rings → to secure rotating elements ( gear, pulley, etc)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 11 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 12
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
Common
Commonshaft
shaft
loading
loadingmechanism:
mechanism:
• Significant detail is required
to completely specify the
geometry needed to
fabricate a shaft.
• The geometry of a shaft is
generally that of a stepped
cylinder.
• The use of shaft shoulders is
an excellent means of axially
locating the shaft elements
and to carry any thrust
loads.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 13 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 14
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
Common
Commontorque
torquetransfer
transferelements:
elements: Pins:
Pins:
• Keys
• Splines
• Setscrews
Round pins Taper pins Split tubular
• Pins spring pins
• Press or shrink fits - Pins are used for axial positioning and for the transfer of torque or thrust or both.
- Some pins should not be used to transmit very much torque
• Tapered fits
- Weakness – will generate stress concentration to the shaft
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 15 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 16
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
Keys
Keysand
andkeyseats:
keyseats: Spline
Splineshaft
shaftand
andHub:
Hub:
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
Locational
Locationaldevice:
device: Nut
Nutand
andWasher:
Washer:
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 19 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 20
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
Sleeve:
Sleeve: Shaft
Shaftshoulder
shoulder: :
Example:
(a) Choose a shaft configuration to support and locate the two gears and two bearings.
(b) Solution uses an integral pinion, three shaft shoulders, key and keyway, and sleeve.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 21 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 22
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
Spring
Springloaded
loadedRetaining
RetainingRing
Ring: : Set
SetScrew
Screw: :
is a type of screw generally used
• Most popular used because give an economical to secure an object within another
solution to some problem. object. The set screw passes
through a threaded hole in the
• “Bowed” retaining rings provide restoring forces to
outer object and is tightened
the components being held.
against the inner object to prevent
• Flat retaining rings allow small amounts of axial it from moving relative to the outer
motion of the held component. object.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 23 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 24
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
Split
SplitHub
Hub: : Collar
Collarand
andScrew
Screw: :
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 25 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 26
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress 6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont…
Critical
CriticalLocation
Location: : Critical
CriticalLocation
Location: :
• It is not necessary to evaluate the stresses in a shaft at every point; a few • Resultant moments are obtained by summing moments as vectors at points of
potentially critical locations will be adequate. interest along the shaft. In situations where a bearing is located at the end of the
shaft, stresses near the bearing are often not critical since the bending moment is
• Critical locations will usually be on the outer surface, at axial locations where the
small.
bending moment is large, where the torque is present, and where stress
concentrations exist. • Axial stresses on shafts due to the axial components transmitted through helical
gears or tapered roller bearings will almost always be negligibly small compared
• Most shafts will transmit torque through a portion of the shaft. Typically the torque
to the bending moment stress. They are often also constant, so they contribute
comes into the shaft at one gear and leaves the shaft at another gear. The torque
little to fatigue.
is often relatively constant at steady state operation.
• Consequently, it is usually acceptable to neglect the axial stresses induced by the
• The bending moments on a shaft can be determined by shear and bending
gears and bearings when bending is present in a shaft. If an axial load is applied
moment diagrams. Since most shaft problems incorporate gears or pulleys that
to the shaft in some other way, it is not safe to assume it is negligible without
introduce forces in two planes, the shear and bending moment diagrams will
checking magnitudes.
generally be needed in two planes.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 27 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 28
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont… 6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont…
Shaft
ShaftStresses
Stresses: : Shaft
ShaftStresses
Stresses: :
• The fluctuating stresses due to bending and torsion are given by: - • Combining bending and shear stresses accordance to the von Misses stress
at two stress element are given by: -
M ac M mc Ta c T c
σa = K f ; σm = K f τ a = K fs ; τ m = K fs m ⎡⎛ 32 K f M a ⎞ 2 ⎛ 16 K fsTa ⎞ 2 ⎤
1/ 2
I I J J
σ 'a = (σ + 3τ )
2 2 1/ 2
= ⎢⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + 3⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎥
⎢⎣⎝ πd ⎝ πd ⎠ ⎥⎦
a a 3 3
Under many conditions, the axial components F is either zero or so small that it can be neglected. ⎠
• Assuming a solid shaft with round cross section, appropriate geometry terms
can be introduced for c, I, and J resulting in 1/ 2
⎡⎛ 32 K f M m ⎞ 2 ⎛ 16 K fsTm ⎞ 2 ⎤
32 M a 32 M m 16Ta 16T σ 'm = (σ + 3τ )
2 2 1/ 2
= ⎢⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + 3⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎥
⎢⎣⎝ πd ⎝ πd
m m 3 3
σa = K f ; σm = K f τ a = K fs ; τ m = K fs 3m ⎠ ⎠ ⎥⎦
πd 3
πd 3 πd 3
πd
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 29 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 30
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont… 6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont…
Shaft
ShaftStresses
Stresses: : DE-Goodman
DE-Goodman: :
1 16 ⎧ 1 ⎫
[
= 3 ⎨ 4( K f M a ) 2 + 3( K fsTa ) 2
n πd ⎩ S e
] 1/ 2
+
1
[
4( K f M m ) 2 + 3( K fsTm ) 2 ] 1/ 2
⎬
Sut ⎭
1/ 3
⎛ 16n ⎧ 1 ⎫⎞
d = ⎜⎜
π
[ 2
⎨ 4( K f M a ) + 3( K fsTa )
2
] 1/ 2
+
1
[
4( K f M m ) 2 + 3( K fsTm ) 2 ] 1/ 2
⎬ ⎟⎟
⎝ ⎩ e
S Sut ⎭⎠
This criteria does not guard against yielding, so required separate check for possibility of static
failure (yield occur) in the first load cycle.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 31 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 32
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont… 6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont…
DE-Gerber
DE-Gerber: : DE-ASME
DE-ASMEElliptic
Elliptic: :
Fatigue failure curve on the Gerber diagram Fatigue failure curve on the ASME Elliptic diagram
where
1/ 2
⎧ 2 1/ 2 ⎫
1 16 ⎡⎢ ⎛ K f M a ⎞ ⎛ K fsTm ⎞ ⎤
2 2 2 2
1 8 A ⎪ ⎡ ⎛ 2 BS e ⎞ ⎤ ⎪ ⎛ K fsTa ⎞
⎟ + 3⎜⎜
⎛ K f Mm ⎞
⎟ + 4⎜ ⎟ + 3⎜ ⎟ ⎥
= ⎨1 + ⎢1 + ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ ⎬ A = 4( K f M a ) 2 + 3( K fsTa ) 2 = 4⎜
n πd 3 S e ⎪ ⎢ ⎜⎝ ASut ⎟⎠ ⎥ ⎪ n πd 3 ⎢ ⎜⎝ S e ⎟⎠ ⎝ S e ⎟⎠ ⎜ S
⎝
⎟
⎠
⎜ S ⎟ ⎥
⎝ ⎠ ⎦
⎩ ⎣ ⎦ ⎭ ⎣ y y
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont… 6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont…
DE-Soderberg
DE-Soderberg: : Check
Checkfor
foryielding
yielding: :
Fatigue failure curve on the Soderberg diagram Always necessary to consider static failure, even in fatigue situation
•Soderberg criteria inherently guards against yielding
⎧⎪ 1 ⎫⎪
1 16
=
n πd 3
[ 2
⎨ 4( K f M a ) + 3( K fsTa )
2
] 1/ 2
+
1
[
4( K f M m ) 2 + 3( K fsTm ) 2 ] 1/ 2
⎬
•ASME-Elliptic criteria takes yielding into account, but is not entirely conservative
•Gerber and modified Goodman criteria require specific check for yielding
⎪⎩ e
S S yt ⎪⎭
Sy
Factor of safety ny =
Equation for the minimum diameter
σ 'max
1/ 3
⎛ 16n ⎧⎪ 1 ⎫⎪ ⎞
[ ] 1
[ ]
where
d =⎜ ⎬ ⎟⎟ σ 'max = (σ 'a2 +σ 'm2 )
1/ 2 1/ 2
4( K f M a ) 2 + 3( K fsTa ) 2 + 4( K f M m ) 2 + 3( K fsTm ) 2
⎜ π ⎨⎪ S e
1/ 2
⎝ ⎩ S yt ⎪⎭ ⎠
1/ 2
⎡⎛ 32 K f ( M a + M m ) ⎞ 2 ⎛ 16 K fs (Ta + Tm ) ⎞ 2 ⎤
This criteria inherently guards against yielding, so it is not required to check for possibility of = ⎢⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + 3⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎥
static failure (yield occur) in the first load cycle. ⎢⎣⎝ πd 3 ⎠ ⎝ πd 3 ⎠ ⎥⎦
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 35 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 36
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont… 6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont…
Example
Example6-1
6-1: :
For a rotating shaft with constant bending and torsion, the bending stress is
completely reversed and the torsion is steady. Therefore
At a machined shaft shoulder the small diameter d is 28 mm, the large diameter
D is 42 mm, and the fillet radius is 2.8 mm. The bending moment is 142.4 Nm
and the steady torsion moment is 124.3 Nm. The heat-treated steel shaft has an
ultimate strength of Sut = 735 MPa and a yield strength of Sy = 574 MPa. The
reliability goal is 0.99.
(a) Determine the fatigue factor of safety of the design using each of the
fatigue failure criteria described in this section.
σm = 0 τa = 0
(b) Determine the yielding factor of safety.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 37 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 38
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont… 6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont…
Solution
Solution6-1
6-1: :
S e ' = 0.5(735) = 367.5 MPa k a = 4.51(735) −0.265 = 0.787
−0.107
M a = 142.4 Nm ⎛ 28 ⎞
M m = 0 Nm S e = (0.787)(0.87)(0.814)(367.5) = 205 MPa kb = ⎜ ⎟ = 0.87
⎝ 7.62 ⎠
Ta = 0 Nm Tm = 124.3 Nm Applying Eq. DE-Goodman criteria gives k c = k d = k f = 1.0
1 16 ⎧ 1 ⎫
a) Determine the fatigue factor of safety of the design: = [
⎨ 4( K f M a )
n πd 3 ⎩ S e
2
] 1/ 2
+
1
[
3( K fsTm ) 2 ] 1/ 2
⎬ ke = 0.814
Sut ⎭
D 42 q = 0.85 (figure 4-1)
[
⎧ 4(1.58(142.4)) 2 ] [3(1.39(124.3)) ] ⎫
1/ 2 1/ 2
r = 2.8 2
= = 1.50 Kt = 1.68 (figure A-15-9) 16 ⎪ ⎪
d 28 qs = 0.92 (figure 4-2) = ⎨ + ⎬
Sut = 0.735 GPa π (0.028)3 ⎪⎩ 205 x106 735 x10 6
⎪⎭
Kts = 1.42 (figure A-15-8)
r 2.8
= = 0.10
d 28 K f = 1 + 0.85(1.68 − 1) = 1.58 = 232004(2.195 x10 −6 + 0.407 x10 −6 ) = 0.604
K fs = 1 + 0.92(1.42 − 1) = 1.39 ∴n = 1.65
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 39 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 40
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont… 6.4 – Shaft Design for Stress – cont…
∴ n = 1.87 DE-Gerber • Stress analysis for shafts is highly dependent on stress concentrations.
∴n = 1.88 DE-ASME Elliptic
• Stress concentrations depend on size specifications, which are not known
the first time through a design process.
∴n = 1.56 DE-Soderberg • Standard shaft elements such as shoulders and keys have standard
proportions, making it possible to estimate stress concentrations factors
b) Determine the Yield factor of safety : before determining actual sizes.
2 2
⎛ 32(1.58)(142.4) ⎞ ⎛ 16(1.40)(124.3) ⎞
σ 'max = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + ⎜⎜ π (0.028) 3 ⎟⎟ = 125.4 Table 6–1
⎝ π (0.028)
3
⎠ ⎝ ⎠ First Iteration Estimates
for Stress-Concentration
Sy 574 Factor Kt and Kts
∴ ny = = = 4.58
σ 'max 125.4
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 41 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 42
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
Reducing
ReducingStress
StressConcentration
ConcentrationatatShoulder
ShoulderFillet
Fillet • Shaft subject to bending produces deflection (δ or y)
• Deflection analysis at even a single point of interest requires complete
• Bearings often require relatively sharp fillet radius at shoulder
geometry information for the entire shaft.
• If such a shoulder is the location of the critical stress, some manufacturing techniques • Deflection of the shaft, both linear and angular should be checked at
are available to reduce the stress concentration
gears and bearings.
(a) Large radius undercut into shoulder
(b) Large radius relief groove into back of shoulder
(c) Large radius relief groove into small diameter of shaft Table 6–2
Typical Maximum
Ranges for Slopes and
Transverse Deflections
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 43 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 44
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
• Deflection analysis is straightforward, but lengthy and tedious to carry out 3 types of fitting
manually.
Interference Fits.
• Each point of interest requires entirely new deflection analysis. An interference fit is the condition that exist when,
Clearance Fits. due to the limits of the
dimensions, mating parts
• Consequently, shaft deflection analysis is almost always done with the No interference occur.
must be pressed together.
assistance of software.
• Options include specialized shaft software, general beam deflection software,
and finite element analysis software.
• Some popular methods to solve the integration problem for beam deflection:-
Transition Fits.
9 Superposition The fit can have either
9 The moment-area method Refer in text book clearance or interference.
chapter 4 page 147
9 Singularity functions
9 Numerical integration
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 45 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 46
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
6.6 – Limits and Fits – cont… 6.6 – Limits and Fits – cont…
Definitions applied to a cylindrical fit.
Capital letters always refer to the hole; Table 6–3
lowercase letters are used for the shaft. Descriptions of Preferred
Fits Using the Basic
Hole System
D = basic size of hole Source: Preferred Metric Limits
d = basic size of shaft and Fits, ANSI B4.2-1978.
δu = upper deviation See also BS 4500.
δl = lower deviation
δF = fundamental deviation
D = tolerance grade for hole
d = tolerance grade for shaft
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 47 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 48
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 6 – Shaft Design
6.6 – Limits and Fits – cont… 6.6 – Limits and Fits – cont…
Table A–12
Table A–11
A Selection of International Tolerance Grades—Metric Series Fundamental
(Size Ranges Are for Over the Lower Limit and Including the Deviations for
Upper Limit. All Values Are in Millimeters) Shafts—Metric Series
(Size Ranges Are for
Source: Preferred Metric Limits and Fits, ANSI B4.2-1978. See also BSI 4500.
Over the Lower Limit
and Including the
Upper Limit.
All Values Are in
Millimeters)
Source: Preferred Metric Limits
and Fits , ANSI B4.2-1978. See
also BSI 4500.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 49 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 50
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
Example
Example6-2
6-2: :
Find the shaft and hole dimensions for a loose running fit with a 34-mm basic size.
Solution
Solution6-2
6-2: :
From Table 6–3, the ISO symbol is 34H11/c11. From Table A–11, we find that tolerance
grade IT11 is 0.160 mm. The symbol 34H11/c11 therefore says that ∆D = ∆d = 0.160 mm.
Using Eq. (Dmax = D + ∆D) for the hole, we get
The shaft is designated as a 34c11 shaft. From Table A–12, the fundamental deviation is
δF = −0.120 mm. Using Eq. “for shaft with clearance fits”, we get the shaft dimensions
dmax = d + δF = 34 + (−0.120) = 33.880 mm
dmin = d + δF − ∆d = 34 + (−0.120) − 0.160 = 33.720 mm
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 51
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
At the end of this topic, the students would be able to apply and
appreciate the knowledge to:
BDA 31203 Notes – Mechanical Component Design
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
• Bearing acting as a support and allow rotational and sliding motion in mechanism.
• 7.1 - Introduction
• 2 types of bearing: sliding & rolling
• 7.2 - Bearing Types
• 7.3 - Bearing Mounting and Enclosure
• 7.4 - Bearing Life
sliding rolling
• 7.5 - Bearing Load Life at Rated Reliability
• Sliding friction is the resistance that takes place when one object slides against
• 7.6 - Relating Load, Life, and Reliability another. Sliding friction can be reduced by using smooth machined surface and
lubrication.
• 7.7 - Combined Radial and Thrust Loading
• Another way to eliminate sliding friction is the introduction of rolling elements (ball,
• 7.8 - Lubrication roller), because rolling elements have smallest contact surface that produces low
friction value (0.001 - 0.005)
• 7.9 - Appendix
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 3 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 4
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
• It as been designed to take pure radial load, pure axial load or combination of Nomenclature
NomenclatureofofBall
BallBearing
Bearing Width
these load. Today, all machines use this bearing such as in vehicle engine, shaft, (B)
Face
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 5 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 6
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
Various
Varioustypes
typesofofball
ballbearings
bearings Various
Varioustypes
typesofofroller
rollerbearings
bearings
Self-Aligning ball bearing Trust ball bearing Tapered roller thrust bearing
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 7 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 8
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
Bearing
BearingCharacteristics
Characteristics
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
Commonly life used term is bearing life and measures are L10 life (number of revolution) Application factor (assume af = 1 if not given)
• Number of revolutions of the inner ring (outer ring stationary) until the first tangible
evidence of fatigue
C10 ( LR nR 60)1/ a = a f FD ( LD nD 60)1/ a
• Number of hours of use at a standard angular speed until the first tangible
evidence of fatigue Catalog load rating, Desired speed, rpm
ibf or kN
Fatigue criterion used by the Timken Company Laboratories Rating life, hours Desired life, hours
• Spalling or pitting of an area of 6.45 mm2 (first evidence of fatigue failure) Rating speed, rpm Desired radial load,
• useful life may extend considerably beyond this point ibf or kN
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 11 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 12
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
7.5 – Bearing Load Life at Rated Reliability – cont… 7.6 – Relating Load, Life and Reliability
Example
Example7-1
7-1 • It is always the desired
parameters (load, speed
Consider SKF, which rates its bearings for 1 million revolutions. Timken for example, uses 90(106) and reliability) is not the
revolutions. If you desire a life of 5000 hour at 1725 rev/min with a load of 2 kN with a reliability of 90 manufacturer’s test
percent, for which catalog rating would you search in a SKF catalog? parameter or catalog
entry.
Solution
Solution7-1
7-1
• To used the catalog data
to comply with the desired
parameters, one needs to
1/ a
1
determine equivalent
⎛ L n 60 ⎞ ⎡ 5000(1725)60 ⎤ 3 catalog load rating by
C10 = a f FD ⎜⎜ D D ⎟⎟ = 2⎢ ⎥⎦ = 16.05 kN using next formula.
⎝ LR nR 60 ⎠ ⎣ 106
Constant reliability contours. Point A represents the catalog rating C10
at X = L / L10 = 1. Point B is on the target reliability design line RD,
with load of C10. Point D is a point on the desired reliability contour
exhibiting the design life XD = LD / L10 at the design load FD.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 13 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 14
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
7.6 – Relating Load, Life and Reliability – cont… 7.6 – Relating Load, Life and Reliability – cont…
Reliability
Reliabilityfor
forbearing
bearingisisgiven
givenby
bythe
theequation:
equation:
1/ a
⎡ xD ⎤
C10 = a f FD ⎢ 1/ b ⎥ ⎛ ⎧ a
⎫ ⎞⎟
b Overall Reliability
⎛ a f FD ⎞
⎣ x0 + (θ − x0 )(ln(1 / RD )) ⎦ ⎜
⎜ ⎪ x D ⎜⎜ C ⎟⎟ − x 0 ⎪ ⎟
• Shaft generally have 2 bearings. Often
these bearings are different.
⎪ ⎪ ⎟
R = exp⎜ − ⎨ ⎝
10 ⎠
where:- ⎬ • If the individual reliability for each
af = Application factor (assume af = 1 if not given) ⎜ ⎪ θ − x0 ⎪ ⎟ individual bearing is RA and RB, therefore
⎜ ⎪ ⎪ ⎟⎟ overall bearing reliability, R is
FD = Desired radial load, ibf / kN ⎜ ⎩ ⎭ ⎠
L 60LD n D ⎝ R = RA RB
xD = Dimensionless desired life = =
L10 60LR n R
where:- x0 ⎫
RD = Desired reliability ⎪
af = Application factor (assume af = 1 if not given)
θ⎬ = Weibull parameters
= 3 (for ball bearing) FD = Desired radial load, ibf / kN
b ⎪⎭
a See (refer table 6-1).
= 10/3 (for roller bearing) Table 7.1 Data for Bearing Manufacturer. L 60LD n D
a xD = Dimensionless desired life = =
Table 7.2 Equivalent Radial Load Factor. L10 60LR n R
x0 ⎫ See
⎪
Table 7.3 Deep-Groove and Angular-Contact Ball RD = Desired reliability
θ ⎬ = Weibull parameters (refer table 6-1). Bearings Catalog. Table 7.1 Data for Bearing Manufacturer.
a = 3 (for ball bearing)
Table 7.2 Equivalent Radial Load Factor.
b ⎪⎭
Table 7.4 Cylindrical Roller Bearings Catalog. a = 10/3 (for roller bearing)
Table 7.3 Deep-Groove and Angular-Contact Ball
Bearings Catalog.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 15 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 16
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Table 7.4 Cylindrical Roller Bearings Catalog.
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
7.6 – Relating Load, Life and Reliability – cont… 7.6 – Relating Load, Life and Reliability – cont…
Example
Example7-2
7-2 Example
Example7-3
7-3
The design load on a ball bearing is 1840N and an application factor of 1.2 is appropriate. The speed of Based on example 7-2, choose the suitable dimension for Single-Row 02-Series Deep-Groove Ball
the shaft s to be 300 rev/min, the life to be 30 kh with a reliability of 0.99. What is the C10 catalog entry Bearings from table 7-3 and calculate the new reliability.
to be sought (or exceeded) when searching for a deep-groove bearing in a SKF catalog?
Solution
Solution7-3
7-3
Solution
Solution7-2
7-2
• Calculate result, C10 = 29.7 kN
L 60 LD n D 60(30000)(300) • The closest, C10 on the Single-Row 02-Series Deep-Groove Ball Bearings catalog that suitable to
xD = = = = 540
L10 60 LR n R 10 6 hold 29.77 kN load is 30.7 kN.
• Therefore, the selected bearing size is:-
Thus, the design life is 540 times the L10 life. For a ball bearing, a = 3, thus from previous equation. OD = 80 mm , Bore = 40 mm & Width = 18 mm
⎛ ⎧ 1.483
⎞
⎜ 540⎛ (1.2)(1.84) ⎞ − 0.02 ⎫
3
1/ 3 ⎟
⎡ 540 ⎤ ⎜ ⎪ ⎪ ⎜ ⎟ ⎪ ⎟
C10 = (1.2)(1.84) ⎢ = 29.7 kN ⎝ 30.7 ⎠ ⎪
1 / 1.483 ⎥ • And the new reliability is R = exp⎜ − ⎨ ⎬ ⎟ = 0.9914
⎣ 0.02 + (4.439)(ln 1 / 0.99) ⎦ ⎜ ⎪ 4.439 ⎪ ⎟
⎜ ⎪ ⎪⎭ ⎟
⎝ ⎩ ⎠
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 17 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 18
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
7.7 – Combined Radial and Thrust Loading 7.7 – Combined Radial and Thrust Loading – cont…
Equivalent
Equivalentradial
radialload
load
• Ball bearing is capable to resist radial load, thrust load or
combine of these loading. Fe = X iVFr + Yi Fa
• However, the capability of ball bearings to withstand the thrust
load had certain limits and not good enough such as thrust where
Fa - axial thrust • X and Y value need to be
bearing or tapered roller bearing. Fr - radial load select from table 7-2
Xi - radial load factor (table 7-2)
• While the straight roller bearing is just capable to withstand large Yi - thrust load factor (table 7-2) • Table 7-2 list X1, Y1 and X2, Y2
V
radial load compare than ball bearing. - rotation factor
as a e function based on the
⎧= 1.0 - Inner ring rotates ratio of the thrust component to
⎪
V = ⎨= 1.2 - Outer ring rotates the bearing static load catalog
• ABMA has come out guidelines to determine equivalent radial ⎪= 1.0 - Self aligning bearing
load for ball bearing that acts with thrust load as follow: ⎩ rating Fa / C0.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 19 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 20
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
7.7 – Combined Radial and Thrust Loading – cont… 7.7 – Combined Radial and Thrust Loading – cont…
Example Solution
Solution7-4
7-4––cont…
Example7-4
7-4 cont…
An SKF 6210 angular-contact ball bearing has an axial load Fa of 1780 N and a radial load Fr of 2225 N
applied with the outer ring stationary. The basic static load rating C0 is 19,800 N and the basic load Fe = X 2VFr + Y2 Fa = 0.56(1)2225 + 1.527(1780) = 3964N
rating C10 is 35,150 N. Estimate the L10 life at a speed of 720 rev/min.
Fa / C0 e Fa / C0 Y2
0.084 0.28 0.084 1.55
0.090 e from which e = 0.285 0.090 Y2 from which Y2 = 1.527
0.110 0.30 0.110 1.45 ** See more example on bearing analysis – example 7-5 & 7-6
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 21 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 22
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 23 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 24
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
Table 7-2 : Equivalent Radial Load Factors for Ball Bearings Table 7-3 : Dimensions and Load Ratings for Single-Row 02-Series Deep-Groove and Angular-Contact Ball Bearings.
dS
dH
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 25 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 26
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
Table 7-4 : Dimensions and Basic Load Ratings for Cylindrical Roller Bearings.
Table 7-5 : Bearing-Life Recommendations for Various Classes of Machinery
Machines for 8-h service that are not always fully utilized 14 – 20
Machines for continuous 24-h service where reliability is of extreme importance 100 - 200
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 27 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 28
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
Example 7-5
The second shaft on a parallel-shaft 18.7 kW foundry crane speed reducer contains a helical gear with a
pitch diameter of 206 mm. Helical gear transmit components of force in the tangential, radial and axial
direction. The components of the gear force transmitted to the second shaft are shown in figure below, at
point A. The bearing reactions at C and D, assuming simple-support, are also shown. A ball bearing is to
be selected for location C to accept the thrust, and a cylindrical roller bearing is to be utilized at location D.
The life goal of the speed reducer is 10 kh, with a reliability factor for the ensemble of all four bearings
(both shaft) to equal or exceed 0.96. The application factor is to be 1.2.
ii) Select the ball bearing (angular contact) for location C, assuming the inner ring rotates.
Solution
The torque transmitted is T =2.648 (0.103) = 0.2727 kNm. The speed at the rated power is
2π n
P = Tω = T
60
60 P 9.55 P 9.55(18.7)
∴n = = = = 655 rpm
2πT T 0.2727
1
CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
The individual bearing reliabilities, if equal, must be at least 4 0.96 = 0.98985 = 0.99 .
L 60 LD n D 60(10000)655
xD = = = = 393
L10 60 LR n R 10 6
1
⎡ ⎤a 3
⎢ ⎥ ⎡ ⎤ 10
393
⎥ = 1.2(1406) ⎢ ⎥ = 16.0 kN
xD
C10 = a f FD ⎢
⎢ ⎛ 1 ⎞ ⎥
1/ b
⎢⎣ x0 + (θ − x 0 )⎜⎝ ln R D ⎟⎠ ⎥⎦
⎢
⎣⎢
(
0.02 + (4.439) ln 1
0.99
)1 / 1.483 ⎥
⎦⎥
The absence of a thrust component makes the selection procedure simple. Choose a 02-25 mm series, or a
03-25 mm series cylindrical roller bearing from Table 7-4.
(b) Selection of angular contact ball bearing at C. (Info obtained af = 1.2 and a = 3). The ball bearing at C
involves a thrust component. This selection procedure requires an iterative procedure. Assuming
Fa / (V Fr) > e.
X2 = 0.56 Y2 = 1.63
1
⎡ ⎤3
393
C10 = 1.2(3650 ) ⎢ ⎥ = 53.1 kN
⎣⎢
(
⎢ 0.02 + ( 4.439) ln 1
0.99
)
1 / 1.483
⎥
⎦⎥
From Table 7-3, angular contact bearing 02-60 mm has C10 = 55.9 kN. C0 is 35.5 kN. Step 4 becomes,
with Fa in kN,
Fa 1.531
= = 0.0431
C 0 35.5
2
CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
F 1531
Which makes e from Table 7-2 approximately 0.24. Now a
= = 0.74 , which is greater
than 0.24, so we find Y2 by interpolation: VFr 1.0(2067)
Fa / C0 e Fa / C0 Y2
3.97
C10 = (53.1) = 57.8 kN
3.65
From Table 7-3, angular contact bearing 02-65 mm has C10 = 63.7 kN and C0 is 41.5 kN. Again,
Fa 1.531
= = 0.0369
C 0 41.5
F 1531
Making e approximately 0.23. Now from before a
= = 0.74 , which is greater than 0.23,
so we find Y2 again by interpolation: VFr 1.0(2067)
Fa / C0 e Fa / C0 Y2
4.07
C10 = (53.1) = 59.2 kN
3.65
From Table 7-3, angular contact bearing 02-65 mm is still selected, so the iteration is complete.
3
CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
Example 7-6
The figure shown is a geared countershaft with an overhanging pinion at C. Select an angular contact ball
bearing from table 7-3 for mounting at O and a 02-series cylindrical roller bearing for mounting at B. The
force on gear A is FA = 2700 N, and the shaft is to run at a speed of 480 rev/min. Specify the bearings
required, using an application factor of 1.4, a desired life of 50,000 hour, and a combined reliability goal of
0.90. All dimension stated are in millimeter.
500
400
O
FC
250 20o
z
Gear 3 B
600 D
2
Gear 4
FA
250 D x
20o
Solution
FBD
Oy
Oz
TA = (FA cos 20o)(0.3)
FC sin 20o
FA sin 20o
Solution of the static problem gives force of bearings against the shaft at O as RO = -1740j + 2100k N, and
at B as RB = 1420j – 7270k. N.
60LR nR = 106
LD = 50 khours
nD = 480 rpm
FD at O = [(-1740)2 + (2100)2]1/2 = 2727.2 N
FD at B = [(1420)2 + (-7270)2]1/2 = 7407.4 N
4
CHAPTER 7 – Bearings
For a combined reliability goal of 0.90, use 0.90 = 0.95 for the individual bearings.
60 LD n D 60(50000)(480)
xD = = = 1440
60 LR n R 10 6
1/ 3
⎡ 1440 ⎤
∴C10 = (1.4)(2727.2) ⎢ 1 / 1.483 ⎥
= 50.6 kN
⎣ 0.02 + (4.439)(ln 1 / 0.95) ⎦
60 LD n D 60(50000)(480)
xD = = = 1440
60 LR n R 10 6
3 / 10
⎡ 1440 ⎤
∴C10 = (1.4)(7407.4) ⎢ 1 / 1.483 ⎥
= 106.1 kN
⎣ 0.02 + (4.439)(ln 1 / 0.95) ⎦
5
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
At the end of this topic, the students would be able to apply and
appreciate the knowledge to:
BDA 31203 Notes – Mechanical Component Design
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
• 8.1 - Introduction
• The fundamental operation in manufacture is the creation of shape - this includes
• 8.2 - Thread Standards and Definitions
assembly, where a number of components are fastened or joined together either
• 8.3 - The Mechanics of Power Screws
permanently by welding (Chapter 9) or detachably (nonpermanent) by screws, nuts and
• 8.4 - Threaded Fasteners
bolts and so on.
• 8.5 - Joints : Fastener Stiffness
• Since there is such a variety of shapes in engineering to be assembled, it is hardly
• 8.6 - Joints : Member Stiffness
surprising that there is more variety in demountable fasteners than in any other machine
• 8.7 - Bolt Strength
element.
• 8.8 - Tension Joints : The External Load
• Fasteners based upon screw threads are the most common, so it is important that their
• 8.9 - Relating Bolt Torque to Bolt Tension
performance is understood, and the limitations of the fastened assemblies are
• 8.10 - Statically Loaded Tension Joint with Preload
appreciated.
• 8.11 - Gasketed Joints
• Bolts, screws and nuts are common fastener used to join between one part to another.
• 8.12 - Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints
This type of joining is a temporary connection in which it is easy to open again.
• 8.13 - Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 3 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 4
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
• Although the bolts and screws have very similar functions, but there are differences in the • There are many types of bolts are available in the market. Figure 8-2 below shows the
application. types of bolts that are commonly used.
• Bolt used where it thread is designed to get through and past the hole in the part to be
connected and then tied with a nut at the end of the bolt.
• While the screws are used where it thread is designed to bind the connection with the
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)
internal threaded screw. Figure 8-1 shows the difference in application of bolts and screws. Figure 8-2: Several types of bolt (a) Carriage, (b) Elevator, (c) Countersunk, (d) Plow, (e) Track, (f) Stud, (g) Stove, (h) Stove.
• Then, screws also can be further categorized into several types according to it use i.e.,
machine screws, sheet metal & lag screw and set screw. Figure 8-3, 8-4 and 8-5 shows the
types of screws have been categorized according to it application.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
Figure 8-5: Several types of set screw; (a) Headless flat point, (b) Square head cup point,
(c) Hex socket head, cone point, (d) Fluted socket head, dual point,
(e) Full-dog point, (f) Half-dog point.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 7 Department of Material and Engineering Design, Figure 8-7: Single, double & triple threaded screw 8
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.2 – Thread Standards and Definitions – cont… 8.2 – Thread Standards and Definitions – cont…
• All threads are made according to the right-hand rule unless otherwise noted. 1) Metric thread (Table 8-1) Major diameter (mm),
2α = 60° Standard thread is RH (Right Handed)
• All threads size on bolt and screw were followed according to the inch series or
Specifications: e.g.: M12 x 1.75 or MJ12 x 1.75
metric series standard. M = Basic Metric, J = greater root radius for fatigue applications; 12 = nominal major diameter (mm); 1.75 = pitch (mm)
• Inch series referred to the American standard where it has been approved by Great
Britain, Canada and United States. Threaded that have been produced according to
this standard is also known as “Unified threads”. Two major series are: UN and UNR 2) The American National (Unified) thread (Table 8-2)
Thread standards is used mainly in the US and GB.
• For threaded that have been produced
Series designation used UN or UNR Figure 8-9: Regular or Flat Thread
according to metric standard is known
UN (regular thread), UNR (greater root radius for fatigue applications)
as “M series”. Specifications: e.g.: 5/8”-18 UN, UNC, UNF, UNR, UNRC, UNRF
• Metric bolt designation determined by: 5/8” = nominal major diameter (inch) ; 18 = Number of threads per inch (N)
UN = Unified, F = fine, C = Coarse, R = Round Root
M12 x 1.75
pitch 3) Square and The ACME Threads Figure 8-10: Rounded Thread
Nominal diameter (mm) Square and Acme threads are used when the threads are intended to transmit power.
Used mainly in power screws Table 8-3 gives preferred pitches for ACME threads.
Figure 8-8: Basic profile for metric M and MJ threads.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 9 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 10
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.2 – Thread Standards and Definitions – cont… 8.2 – Thread Standards and Definitions – cont…
8.2 – Thread Standards and Definitions – cont… 8.2 – Thread Standards and Definitions – cont…
Nominal Coarse – Pitch Series Fine – Pitch Series
Coarse Series – UNC Fine Series - UNF
Major
Diameter Nominal
Tensile Stress Minor Diameter Tensile Stress Minor Diameter Size Minor Minor
d (mm) Pitch p (mm) Pitch p (mm) Major Threads per Tensile Stress Threads per Tensile Stress
Area At (mm2) Area Ar (mm2) Area At (mm2) Area Ar (mm2) Designation Diamater Diameter
Diameter in Inch N Area At in2 Inch N Area At in2
1.6 0.35 1.27 1.07 Area Ar in2 Area Ar in2
2 0.40 2.07 1.79 0 0.0600 80 0.001 80 0.001 51
2.5 0.45 3.39 2.98
1 0.0730 64 0.002 63 0.002 18 72 0.002 78 0.002 37
3 0.5 5.03 4.47
2 0.0860 56 0.003 70 0.003 10 64 0.003 94 0.003 39
3.5 0.6 6.78 6.00
4 0.7 8.78 7.75 3 0.0990 48 0.004 87 0.004 06 56 0.005 23 0.004 51
5 0.8 14.2 12.7 4 0.1120 40 0.006 04 0.004 96 48 0.006 61 0.005 66
Table 8-1 Table 8-2 5 0.1250 40 0.007 96 0.006 72 44 0.008 80 0.007 16
6 1 20.1 17.9
Diameter and 8 1.25 36.6 32.8 1 39.2 36.0 Diameter and 6 0.1380 32 0.009 09 0.007 45 40 0.010 15 0.008 74
10 1.5 58.0 52.3 1.25 61.2 56.3 8 0.1640 32 0.014 0 0.011 96 36 0.014 74 0.012 85
Areas of Coarse- Areas of Unified
12 1.75 84.3 76.3 1.25 92.1 86.0 10 0.1900 24 0.017 5 0.014 50 32 0.020 0 0.017 5
Pitch and Fine- Screw Threads
14 2 115 104 1.5 125 116 12 0.2160 24 0.024 2 0.020 6 28 0.025 8 0.022 6
Pitch Metric 16 2 157 144 1.5 167 157 UNC and UNF*.
¼ 0.2500 20 0.031 8 0.026 9 28 0.036 4 0.032 6
Threads. 20 2.5 245 225 1.5 272 259 0.3125 18 0.052 4 0.045 4 24 0.058 0 0.052 4
24 3 353 324 2 384 365
⅜ 0.3750 16 0.077 5 0.067 8 24 0.087 8 0.080 9
30 3.5 561 519 2 621 596
0.4375 14 0.106 3 0.093 3 20 0.118 7 0.109 0
36 4 817 759 2 915 884
½ 0.5000 13 0.141 9 0.125 7 20 0.159 9 0.148 6
42 4.5 1120 1050 2 1260 1230
48 5 1470 1380 2 1670 1630 0.5625 12 0.182 0.162 18 0.203 0.189
56 5.5 2030 1910 2 2300 2250 ⅝ 0.6250 11 0.226 0.202 18 0.256 0.240
64 6 2680 2520 2 3030 2980 ¾ 0.7500 10 0.334 0.302 16 0.373 0.351
72 6 3460 3280 2 3860 3800 ⅞ 0.8750 9 0.462 0.419 14 0.509 0.480
80 6 4340 4140 1.5 4850 4800 1 1.0000 8 0.606 0.551 12 0.663 0.625
90 6 5590 5360 2 6100 6020 1¼ 1.2500 7 0.969 0.890 12 1.073 1.024
100 6 6990 6740 2 7560 7470 1½ 1.5000 6 1.405 1.294 12 1.581 1.521
110 2 9180 9080
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 13 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 14
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
79
5 79
5
16 CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints 16 CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design
8.2 – Thread Standards and Definitions – cont… 8.2 – Thread Standards and Definitions – cont…
• The diameter of this unthreaded rod is the average of the pitch diameter
and the minor diameter of the threaded rod. Table 8-3: Preferred Pitches for Acme Threads
d, in 1\4 5\16 3\8 1\2 5\8 3\4 7\8 1 11\4 13\4 2 21\2 3
p, in 1\16 1\14 1\12 1\10 1\8 1\6 1\6 1\5 1\5 1\4 1\4 1\3 1\2
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 15 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 16
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw 8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont…
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 17 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 18
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont… 8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont…
• Since the normal force N, is not interested, eliminate it from the equation.
• To raise a load, a force PR acts to the right, and to lower the load, PL acts to the left.
• Then, divide the numerator and the denominator of these equations by cos λ and use
• The friction force is the product of the coefficient of friction f with the normal force N, the relation tan λ = l / πdm.
and act oppose the motion.
• Finally, noting that the torque is the product of the force P and the mean radius dm/2,
• The system is equilibrium under the action of these forces and hence, for raising the
load:
Torque required for raising the load
∑ Fx = PR − N sin λ − fN cos λ = 0
TR to overcome thread friction and to
raise the load
TR =
Fd m
2
⎛ l + π fd m ⎞
⎜
⎜ π d − fl ⎟
⎝ m
⎟
⎠
∑F y = − F − fN sin λ + N cos λ = 0
Torque required for lowering the load ⎛ π fd m − l ⎞
• In a similar manner, for lowering the load; Fd m
TL = ⎜ ⎟
TL to overcome part of the thread
friction in lowering the load 2 ⎜ π d + fl
⎝ m
⎟
⎠
∑ Fx = − PL − N sin λ + fN cos λ = 0
where,
8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont… 8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont…
If the lead is large or the friction is low, the load will lower itself by causing the screw to If f > fcr then the thread is self-locking in that the nut cannot undo by itself, it needs to
spin without any external effort. In such cases the torque TL will be negative or zero. be unscrewed by a definite negative torque; Clearly self-locking behavior is essential
When a positive torque is obtained from this equation, the screw is said to be self for threaded fasteners.
locking Car lifting jacks would not be of much use if the load fell as soon as the operating
handle was released.
Condition for Self Locking: π fd m > l If f < fcr then the thread is overhauling in that the nut will unscrew by itself under the
action of the load unless prevented by a positive tightening torque.
Dividing both sides of the above inequality by π d m and recognizing that l π dm = tan λ , Fl
If we let f = 0 , we obtain T0 = which is the torque,
we get f > tan λ 2π
required to raise the load.
The critical coefficient of friction for the lead concerned, T0 Fl
The efficiency is therefore e= =
If f = fcr the nut is on the point of moving down the thread without any torque applied. T R 2π T R
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 21 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 22
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont… 8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont…
• For ACME or other threads, the normal thread load is inclined to The following stresses should be checked on both the
the axis because of the thread angle 2α and the lead angle λ. nut and the screw:
• Since lead angle is small, this inclination can be neglected. 16T
1. Shearing stress in screw body. τ =
• Just consider angle α, which increase the frictional force. πd r3
• For raising the load:
F 4F
Fd m ⎛ l + π fd m sec α ⎞ 2. Axial stress in screw body σ = =
TR = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ A πd r2
Figure 8-15: Normal thread force 2 ⎝ π d m − fl sec α ⎠
is increased because of angle α
3. Thread bearing stress
• An additional component of torque is often needed to
account for the friction between a collar and the load. F 2F
σB = − =−
• If fc is the coefficient of collar friction, assuming the load is πd m nt p / 2 πd m nt p
concentrated at the mean collar diameter dc Figure 8-17:
Ff c d c Geometry of square thread useful in finding bending
TC = where nt is the number of engaged threads. and transverse shear stresses at the thread root
2
Department of Material and Engineering Design, Figure 8-16: Thrust collar
23 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 24
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. has frictional diameter, dc University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont… 8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont…
3V 3 F 3F
τ = = =
2A 2 πd r nt ( p / 2) πd r nt p
Transform to von Mises stress
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 25 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 26
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont… 8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont…
Thread Deformation in Screw-Nut Combination Table 8-4: Screw bearing Pressure pb.
• Consequently, the engaged threads cannot share the load equally. Some Steel Bronze 5.5 – 9.7 100-200 mm/s
Cast iron 4.1 – 6.9 100-200 mm/s
experiment shows that: Steel Bronze 1.0 – 1.7 ≥ 250 mm/s
9 the third engaged thread carries 0.18 of the load Screw Nut Material
9 the seventh engaged thread is free of load Material
Steel Bronze Brass Cast Iron
Steel, dry 0.15 - 0.25 0.15 - 0.23 0.15 - 0.19 0.15 - 0.25
• To find the largest stress in the first thread of a screw-nut combination, use Steel, machine oil 0.11 - 0.17 0.10 - 0.16 0.10 - 0.15 0.11 - 0.17
0.38F in place of F, and set nt = 1. Bronze 0.08 - 0.12 0.04 - 0.06 - 0.06 - 0.09
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 27 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 28
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont… 8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont…
Example
Example8-1
8-1
Table 8-6: Thrust Collar friction coefficient, fc.
Combination Running Starting A square thread power screw has a major diameter of 32 mm and a pitch of 4 mm with
Soft steel on cast iron 0.12 0.17 double threads. The load of 6.4 kN used in this application. If f = fc =0.08, dc=40mm,
Hard steel on cast iron 0.09 0.15 determine;
Soft steel on bronze 0.08 0.10 a) thread depth, thread width, pitch diameter, minor diameter and lead.
Hard steel on bronze 0.06 0.08
b) the torque required to raise and lower the load.
c) the efficiency during lifting the load.
Coefficients of friction around 0.1 to 0.2 may be expected for common materials under d) the body stresses, torsional and compressive.
conditions of ordinary service and lubrication.
e) the bearing stress.
f) the thread bending stress at the root of the thread.
g) the Von Misses stress at the root of the thread.
h) the maximum shear stress at the root of the thread.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 29 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 30
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont… 8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont…
Solution
Solution8-1
8-1 Fd m ⎛ πfd m − l ⎞ Ff c d c 6.4(30) ⎛ π (0.08)30 − 8 ⎞ 6.4(0.08)( 40)
TL = ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟+
2 ⎜ πd + fl ⎟ + 2 = 2 ⎜⎝ π (30) + 0.08(8) ⎟⎠ 2
⎝ m ⎠
a) thread depth, thread width, pitch diameter, minor diameter and lead.
thread depth = thread width = p/ 2 = 4 / 2 = 2 mm ∴ T L = 9 . 77 Nm
pitch diameter; d m = d − p / 2 = 32 − 4 / 2 = 30 mm
c) the efficiency during lifting the load.
minor diameter; d r = d − p = 32 − 4 = 28 mm
Fl 6.4(8)
lead for double thread, l = np = 2(4) = 8 mm e= = = 0.311
2πTR 2π (26.18)
b) the torque required to raise and lower the load. d) the body stresses, torsional and compressive.
Fd m ⎛ l + πfd m ⎞ Ff c d c 6.4(30 ) ⎛ 8 + π (0.08)(30 ) ⎞ (6.4)(0.08) 40 Tr Td 16T 16(26.18)
TR = ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟+ The body shear stress τ due to τ== 42 = 3 = = 6.07 MPa
2 ⎜ πd − fl ⎟ + 2 = 2 ⎜⎝ π (30 ) − (0.08)(8) ⎟⎠ 2 torsional moment TR J πd r πd r π (0.028)3
⎝ m ⎠
32
∴ TR = 26.18 N .m F −6400 −6400
The axial nominal stress σ is σ= = 2 = = −10.39 MPa
A πd r / 4 π (0.028)2 / 4
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 31 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 32
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont… 8.3 – The Mechanics of Power Screw – cont…
e) the bearing stress, σB is, with one thread carrying 0.38F. For the von Misses stress,
σB = −
2(0.38 F )
πd m (1) p
=−
2(0.38)(6400)
π (30 )(1)4
= −12.9 MPa σ '=
1
2
[(41.5 − 0) 2
+ (0 − (−10.39)) 2 + (−10.39 − 41.5) 2 + 6(6.07) 2 ]
1/ 2
= 48.7 MPa
f) the thread-root bending stress, σb with one thread carrying 0.38F is
6(0.38 F ) 6(0.38)(6400) h) the maximum shear stress
σb = = = 41.5 MPa
πd r (1) p π (28)(1)4 Note that, there are no shear stresses on the x face. This means that σx is a principal
stress. The remaining stress can be transformed by using the plane stress equation.
g) the transverse shear at the extreme of the root cross section due to bending is zero. 2
⎛σ y +σ z ⎞ ⎛σ y −σ z ⎞
However, there is a circumferential shear stress at the extreme of the root cross section σ 2,3 = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ± ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + τ yz2
of the thread as shown in part (d) of 6.07 MPa. The three-dimensional stresses are: ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
σ x = 41.5 MPa τ xy = 0 − 10.39 ⎛ − 10.39 ⎞ 2
2
y
= ± ⎜ ⎟ + 6.07 = 2.79 MPa & - 13.18 MPa
σ y = −10.39 MPa τ yz = 6.07 MPa 2 ⎝ 2 ⎠
σz = 0 τ zx = 0 ⎛ σ − σ 3 ⎞ 41.5 − (−13.18)
x ∴τ max = ⎜ 1 ⎟= = 27.3 MPa
z ⎝ 2 ⎠ 2
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 33 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 34
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
Hexagon-Head Bolt
English
• Hexagon-head bolts are one of the most common for engineering applications
• Standard dimensions are included in Table A–29
• W is usually about 1.5 times nominal diameter
• Bolt length L is measured from below the head Where d is the nominal diameter
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 35 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 36
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 41 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 42
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.5 – Joints : Fastener Stiffness – cont… 8.5 – Joints : Fastener Stiffness – cont…
Procedure to find bolt stiffness Procedure to find bolt stiffness
• Given fastener diameter d and pitch p in mm or number of threads per inch
• Washer thickness: t from Table A-32 or A-33
• Nut thickness [Fig. (a) only]: H from table A-31
8-1 8-2
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 43 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 44
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 45 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 46
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.6 – Joints : Member Stiffness – cont… 8.6 – Joints : Member Stiffness – cont…
For Members made of Aluminum, hardened steel and cast iron 25 < α < 33° From Finite element analysis results,
For α = 30° A and B from table 8.7 for standard
0 .5774 πEd washer Faces and members
k = of same material
(1 .155 t + D − d )( D + d )
ln
(1 .155 t + D + d )( D − d )
km
= A exp (Bd/l)
If the grip consists of any number of members all of the Ed
same material, two identical frusta can be added in
series. The entire joint can be handled with one
equation, Combine all frusta as springs in
series , km
1 1 1 1 1
= + + + ....
k m k1 k 2 k 3 ki
dw is the washer face diameter 0 . 5774 π Ed Figure 8-23: The dimensionless plot of stiffness versus aspect ratio
km =
( )
of the members of a bolted joint, showing the relative
Using standard washer face 0 . 5774 l + 0 . 5 d accuracy of methods of Rotscher, Mischke, and
diameter of 1.5d, and with α = 30º, 2 ln 5 Motosh, compared to a finite-element analysis (FEA)
0 . 5774 l + 2 . 5 d conducted by Wileman, Choudury and Green.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 49 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 50
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.6 – Joints : Member Stiffness – cont… 8.6 – Joints : Member Stiffness – cont…
Example
Example8-2
8-2
Table 8-7:
As shown in figure below, two plates are clamped by washer-faced ½ in-20 UNF x 1½ in SAE
grade 5 bolts each with a standard ½ N steel plain washer.
a) Determine the member spring rate km if the top plate is steel and the bottom plate is gray
cast iron.
b) Using the method of conical frusta, determine the member spring rate km if both plates
are steel.
c) Using Finite Element Approach to Member Stiffness, determine the member spring rate
km if both plates are steel. Compare the results with part (b)
d) Determine the bolt spring rate kb.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 51 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 52
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.6 – Joints : Member Stiffness – cont… 8.6 – Joints : Member Stiffness – cont…
Solution
Solution8-2
8-2 The outer diameter of the frustum of the
steel member at the joint interface is
From Table A-32, the thickness of a standard ½ N washer is 0.095 in.
0 .75 + 2( 0 .595 ) tan 30 o = 1 . 437 in
a) As shown in figure below, the frusta extend halfway into the joint the distance k1
k2
1 The outer diameter at the midpoint of the
( 0 . 5 + 0 . 75 + 0 . 095 ) = 0 . 6725 in
2 entire joint is k3
The distance between the joint line and the 0 .75 + 2( 0 .6725 ) tan 30 = 1 . 527 in
o
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 53 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 54
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.6 – Joints : Member Stiffness – cont… 8.6 – Joints : Member Stiffness – cont…
( )
k2 = km =
⎧ [1.155(0.0775) + 1.437 − 0.5](1.437 + 0.5) ⎫
ln ⎨ ⎬
⎩ [1.155(0.0775) + 1.437 + 0.5](1.437 − 0.5) ⎭ 2 ln 5
0 . 5774 (1 . 345 ) + 0 . 5 ( 0 . 5 )
0 . 5774 (1 . 345 ) + 2 . 5 ( 0 . 5 )
For the lower cast-iron frustum
c) From table 8.7, A = 0.78715, B = 0.62873.
0.5774π (14.5)(10 6 )0.5
k3 = = 14.15(10 6 ) Ibf/in ⎡ 0 . 62873 ( 0 . 5 ) ⎤
⎧ [1.155(0.6725) + 0.75 − 0.5](0.75 + 0.5) ⎫ k m = 30 (10 6 )( 0 . 5 )( 0 . 78715 ) exp ⎢ 6
⎥ = 14 . 92 (10 ) ibf/in
ln ⎨ ⎬ ⎣ 1 . 345 ⎦
⎩ [1.155(0.6725) + 0.75 + 0.5](0.75 − 0.5) ⎭
In this case, the different between results is less than 2%.
1 1 1 1
The three frusta are in series, so = + +
k m 30 . 80 (10 6 ) 285 . 5 (10 6 ) 14 . 15 (10 6 ) d) Following the procedure of slide 36, the threaded length of a 0.5-in bolt is
L T = 2 ( 0 . 5 ) + 0 . 25 = 1 . 25 in
This results in km = 9.378 (106) ibf/in
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 55 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 56
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 59 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 60
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
Table 8-8: SAE Specifications for Steel Bolts (cont…) Table 8-9: ASTM Specifications for Steel Bolts.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 61 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 62
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
Table 8-9: ASTM Specifications for Steel Bolts (cont…) Table 8-9: ASTM Specifications for Steel Bolts (cont…)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 63 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 64
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
Table 8-10: Metric Mechanical-Property Classes for Steel Bolts Table 8-10: Metric Mechanical-Property Classes for Steel Bolts (cont…)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 65 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 66
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.8 – Tension Joints : The External Load 8.8 – Tension Joints : The External Load – cont…
Let us consider what happens when an external tensile load P, is applied • During bolt preload; Fi (clamping force
to a bolt connection. produced by tightening the nut before
Assuming a clamping force, (preload Fi )is applied by tightening the nut external load; P is applied)
before external force, P is applied. – bolt is stretched
– members in grip are compressed
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 67 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 68
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.8 – Tension Joints : The External Load – cont… 8.8 – Tension Joints : The External Load – cont…
• Since External Load P is shared by bolt and members, therefore Resultant Bolt and Member Load : Fb & Fm
P = Pb + Pm
Fb = Pb + Fi = C P + Fi
Fm < 0
Fm = Pm − Fi = (1 − C ) P − Fi
• C is defined as the stiffness constant of the joint;
These results are only valid if the load on the members remains
• C indicates the proportion of external load P that the bolt will carry. A good negative, indicating the members stay in compression.
design target is around 0.2. Fi is preload; high preload is desirable in tension connections.
Table 8-11: Fi = 0.75 Fp for re-use
Computation of Bolt and Fi = 0.90 Fp for permanent joint
Member Stiffnesses. Steel
members clamped using a
½ in – 13 NC steel bolt.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 69 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 70
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.9 – Relating Bolt Torque to Bolt Tension 8.9 – Relating Bolt Torque to Bolt Tension – cont…
• Best way to measure bolt preload is by relating measured bolt elongation and • Assuming a washer face diameter of 1.5d, the collar diameter is
calculated stiffness dc = (d + 1.5d)/2 = 1.25d, giving
• Usually, measuring bolt elongation is not practical
• Measuring applied torque is common, using a torque wrench
• Need to find relation between applied torque and bolt preload
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 71 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 72
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.9 – Relating Bolt Torque to Bolt Tension – cont… 8.9 – Relating Bolt Torque to Bolt Tension – cont…
Example Solution
Solution8-3
Example8-3
8-3 8-3
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 73 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 74
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.9 – Relating Bolt Torque to Bolt Tension – cont… 8.9 – Relating Bolt Torque to Bolt Tension – cont…
0 . 75 + 0 . 6685
dm = = 0 . 7093 in
2
The lead angle is
l 1 1
λ = tan −1 = tan −1 = tan −1 = 1 . 6066 o
πd m πd m N π ( 0 . 7093 )(16 )
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 75 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 76
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.10 – Statically Loaded Tension Joint with Preload 8.10 – Statically Loaded Tension Joint with Preload
Failure of joints occurs when ii) Joint separates
i) Bolt Yields
Let P0 be external load causing separation Fm= 0
At: Tensile stress area
σb =
Fb CP Fi
= + Fm = (1 − C ) P − Fi
At At At
(1 − C ) P0 − Fi = 0
Proof strength Fm = 0
Failure starts σb = Sp P0 Fi
n0 = =
Sp Sp S p At P P (1 − C )
a) Yielding Factor of safety: np = = =
σb (CP + Fi ) / At CP + Fi Fi
For n bolts n =
P / N (1 − C )
S p At − Fi
b) Load Factor: CP + Fi = S p At ∴ nL =
CP no : factor of safety against joint separation
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 77 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 78
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.10 – Statically Loaded Tension Joint with Preload 8.10 – Statically Loaded Tension Joint with Preload
Example Solution
Solution8-4
Example8-4
8-4 8-4
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 79 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 80
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.10 – Statically Loaded Tension Joint with Preload 8.10 – Statically Loaded Tension Joint with Preload
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 81 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 82
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.10 – Statically Loaded Tension Joint with Preload 8.11 – Gasketed Joints
Fm No. of
p=− bolts
Ag / N
With load factor n
Fm = (1 − C ) nP − Fi
N
p = [ Fi − nP (1 − C )]
Ag
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 83 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 84
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 85 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 86
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont… 8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont…
• Bolts are standardized, so endurance strengths are known by experimentation, • With an external load on a per bolt basis fluctuating
including all modifiers. between Pmin and Pmax,
• In thread-rolling the amount of Table 8-14: Full Corrected Endurance Strengths for Bolts
and Screws with Rolled Threads* • The alternating stress experienced by a bolt is
cold-work and strain
strengthening is unknown to the
designer; therefore, fully
corrected (including Kf) axial
endurance strength is reported in
Table 8-14.
• The midrange stress experienced by a bolt is
• Fatigue stress-concentration factor
Kf is also included as a reducer of
the endurance strength, so it
should not be applied to the bolt
stresses.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 87 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 88
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont… 8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont…
Typical Fatigue Load Line for Bolts Typical Fatigue Load Line for Bolts
Typical load line starts Next, find the strength components Sa of the fatigue
from constant preload, failure locus. These depend on the failure Criteria.
then increases with a
constant slope ¾ Goodman Equation of a typical
Se fatigue load line:
Sa Sm Sa = Se − Sm
On the designer’s + =1 S ut
fatigue diagram, Se Sut
σa
shown in Figure 8-26, Sa = (S m − σ i )
¾ Gerber σ m −σi
the load line is . 2 ⎛S ⎞
2
Sa ⎛ Sm ⎞ S a = S e − ⎜⎜ m ⎟ Se
⎟
+⎜ ⎟ =1 ⎝ S ut ⎠ S a (σ m − σ i )
High Preload is Se ⎝ Sut ⎠ ∴ Sm = +σi
especially important σa
in fatigue. σi is a ¾ ASME-
ASME-Elliptic 2
constant the load line 2 2 ⎛S ⎞
⎛ Sa ⎞ ⎛ Sm ⎞ Sa = Se 1 − ⎜ m ⎟
at Fi/At has a unit ⎜ ⎟ + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = 1 ⎜ Sp ⎟
⎝ ⎠
slope, r = 1.0 Figure 8-26: Designer’s fatigue diagram showing a
⎝ Se ⎠ ⎝ Sp ⎠
Goodman failure locus and how a load line is 89 90
Department of Material and Engineering Design, Department of Material and Engineering Design,
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, used to define failure and safety in preloaded Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. bolted joints in fatigue. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont… 8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont…
Typical Fatigue Load Line for Bolts Repeated Load Special Case
• Solving (a) and (b) for Goodman line intersection point, • Bolted joints often experience repeated load, where external load fluctuates
between 0 and Pmax
• Setting Pmin = 0; equation in slide 88
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 91 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 92
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont… 8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont…
¾ Goodman
¾ Gerber • This is equivalent to the yielding factor of safety from slide 77.
¾ ASME –
Elliptic
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 93 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 94
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont… 8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont…
Solution
Solution8-5
8-5
Example
Example8-5
8-5
(a) For the symbols of Figs. 8-22 and 8-27,
h = t1 + t w = 0.6875 in
l = h + d / 2 = 1 in
D2 = 1.5d = 0.9375 in
The joint is composed of three frusta; the upper two frusta are steel and the
lower one is cast iron.
Figure 8-27
Pressure-cone frustum member model for a cap screw. For this For the upper frustrum; using Eq. in slide 49:
model the significant sizes are
⎧h + t2 2 t2 < d t = l / 2 = 0.5 in ⎫
l=⎨ (Refer to slide 43) ⎪
⎩h + D 2 t2 ≥ d D = 0.9375 in ⎬ k1 = 46.46 MIbf/in
D1 = dw + l tan α = 1.5d + 0.577l ⎪
D2 = dw = 1.5d
E = 30 Mpsi ⎭
Where l = effective grip. The solutions are for α=30o and dw=1.5d.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 95 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 96
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Figure 8-27: Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont… 8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont…
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 97 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 98
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont… 8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont…
For the remaining factors, refer to Fig. 8-28 at next slide. This diagram contains the
modified Goodman line, the Gerber line, the proof-strength line, and the load line. The
intersection of the load line L with the respective failure lines at points C, D, and E defines
a set of strengths Sa and Sm at each intersection. Point B represents the stress state σa , Fig. 8–28: Designer’s fatigue diagram for preload bolts, drawn to scale, showing the modified Goodman line, the Gerber line, and the
σm . Point A is the preload stress σi . Therefore the load line begins at A and makes an Larger proof-strength line, with an exploded view of the area of interest. The strengths used are Sp = 85 kpsi, Se = 18.6 kpsi,
and Sut = 120 kpsi. The coordinates are;
angle having a unit slope. The angle is 45o only when both stress axes have the same A, σi = 63.72 kpsi ;
B, σa = 3.10 kpsi, σm = 66.82 kpsi ;
scale. C, Sa = 7.55 kpsi, Sm = 71.29 kpsi ;
D, Sa = 10.64 kpsi, Sm = 74.36 kpsi ;
E, Sa = 11.32 kpsi , Sm = 75.04 kpsi.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 99 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 100
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont… 8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont…
The factors of safety are found by dividing the distances AC, AD and AE by the distance Point D
AB. Note that this is the same as dividing Sa for each theory by σa. This is on the proof-strength line where S m + S a = S p
The quantities shown in the caption of Fig. 8-28 are obtained as follows: In addition, the horizontal projection of the load line AD is S m = σ i + S a
Fi 14.4 Sp −σi 85 − 63.72
Point A σi = = = 63.72 kpsi Solving Eqs. above simultaneously results in S a = = = 10.64 kpsi
At 0.226 2 2
CP 0.280(5) Sa 10.64
σa = = = 3.10 kpsi The factor of safety resulting from this is n p = = = 3.43
Point B 2 At 2(0.226) σa 3.10
σ m = σ a + σ i = 3.10 + 63.72 = 66.82 kpsi which, of course, is identical to the result previously obtained by using Eq. in slide 77.
Point C A similar analysis of a fatigue diagram could have been done using yield strength instead
This is the modified Goodman criteria. From Table 8-14, we find Se = 18.6 kpsi. Then, using of proof strength. Though the two strengths are somewhat related, proof strength is a much
Eq. in Slide 93, the factor of safety is found to be better and more positive indicator of a fully loaded bolt than is the yield strength. It is also
S e ( Sut − σ i ) 18.6(120 − 63.72) worth remembering that proof-strength values are specified in the design codes; yields
nf = = = 2.44 kpsi strengths are not.
σ a ( Sut + S e ) 3.10(120 + 18.6)
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 101 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 102
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.12 – Fatigue Loading of Tension Joints – cont… 8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear
We found nf = 2.44 on the basis of fatigue and the modified Goodman line, and np = 3.43
y Shear loaded joints are handled the
on the basis of proof strength. Thus the danger of failure is by fatigue, not by overproof
same for rivets, bolts, and pins
loading. These two factors should always be compared to determine where is the greatest
danger lies. y Several failure modes are possible
(a) Joint loaded in shear
Point E
For the Gerber criterion, from Eq. in slide 93, the safety factor is (b) Bending of bolt or members
nf =
1
2σ a S e
[S ut Sut2 + 4 S e ( S e + σ i ) − Sut2 − 2σ i S e ] (c) Shear of bolt
(d) Tensile failure of members
=
1
2(3.10)(18.6)
[
120 120 2 + 4(18.6)(18.6 + 63.72) − 120 2 − 2(63.73)(18.6) ] (e) Bearing stress on bolt or members
(f) Shear tear-out
= 3.65
(g) Tensile tear-out
which is greater than np = 3.43 and contradicts the conclusion earlier that the danger of
failure is fatigue. Figure 8-28 clearly shows the conflict where point D lies between points
C and E. Again, the conservative nature of Goodman criterion explains the discrepancy
and the designer must form his or her own conclusion.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 103 Department of Material and Engineering Design,
Fig. 8–29: Modes of failure in shear loading of a 104
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, bolted or riveted connection.
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear 8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear
• Bending moment is approximately M = Ft / 2, where t is the grip length, i.e. • Simple direct shear
the total thickness of the connected parts.
• Use the total cross sectional area of bolts that are carrying
the load.
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 105 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 106
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear 8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 107 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 108
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear 8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear
• Edge shear-out or tear-out is avoided by spacing bolts at least 1.5 diameters The bolted connection shown in Figure 8-30 uses SAE grade 5 bolts. The members are hot-
away from the edge rolled AISI 1018 steel. A tensile shear load F = 4000 Ibf is applied to the connection. Find
the factor of safety for all possible modes of failure.
F = 4000 Ibf
Fig. 8–30
F = 4000 Ibf
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 109 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 110
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear 8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear
Solution
Solution8-6
8-6 Bearing of members Tension on members
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 111 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 112
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear 8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear
Shear Joints with Eccentric Loading Shear Joints with Eccentric Loading
• Eccentric loading is when the load does not pass along a line of symmetry of (a) Example of eccentric loading
the fasteners. (b) Free body diagram
• Requires finding moment about centroid of bolt pattern
(c) Close up of bolt pattern
• Centroid location
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 113 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 114
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear 8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear
• Primary Shear Shown in Fig. 8-32 is a 15 – by 200-mm rectangular steel bar cantilevered to a 250-mm steel
channel using four tightly fitted bolts located at A, B, C, and D.
• Secondary Shear, due to moment load
For a F = 16 kN load find
around centroid
(a) The resultant load on each bolt
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 115 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 116
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear 8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear
V 16
Solution The primary shear load per bolt is F ' = = = 4 kN
Solution8-7
8-7 n 4
(a) Point O, the centroid of the bolt group in Fig. Since the secondary shear forces are equal, Eq. in slide 115 becomes
8-32, is found by symmetry. If a free-body Mr M 6800
F"= = = = 17.7 kN
diagram of the beam were constructed, the 4r 2 4r 4(96.0)
shear reaction V would pass through O and
the moment reactions M would be about O. The primary and secondary shear forces are plotted to scale in Fig. 8-33 and the
These reaction are resultants obtained by using parallelogram rule. The magnitudes are found by
measurement (or analysis) to be
V = 16 kN ; M = 16(425) = 6800 Nm
75 α = 90o − θ = 90o − 51.3o = 38.7 o
In Fig. 8-33, the bolt group has been drawn θ = tan −1 = 51.3o
to a larger scale and the reactions are θo
60 mm 60
shown. The distance from the centroid to the FA = FB = (4 + 17.7 cos 38.7 o ) 2 + (17.7 sin 38.7 o ) 2 = 21.0 kN
center of each bolt is
75 mm
r = (60) 2 + (75) 2 = 96.0 mm FC = FD = (17.7 cos 38.7 o − 4) 2 + (17.7 sin 38.7 o ) 2 = 14.8 kN
Fig. 8–33 αo
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 117 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 118
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear 8.13 – Bolted and Riveted Joints Loaded in Shear
(b) Bolts A and B are critical because they carry the largest shear load. Does this shear act on (d) The critical bending stress in the bar is assumed to occur in a section parallel to the y axis
the threaded portion of the bolt, or on the unthreaded portion? The bolt length will be 25 mm and through bolts A and B. At this section the bending moment is
plus the height of the nut plus about 2 mm for a washer. Table A-31 gives the nut height as
M = 16(300 + 50) = 5600 Nm
14.8 mm. Including two threads beyond the nut, this adds up to a length of 43.8 mm, and so
a bolt 45 mm long will be needed. From Eq. in slide 36, we compute the thread length as The second moment of area through this section is obtained by the use of the transfer
LT = 38mm. Thus the unthreaded portion of the bolt is 45 – 38 = 7 mm long. This is less than formula, as follows:
the 15 mm for the plate in Fig. 8-33, and so the bolt will tend to shear across its minor
I = I bar − 2( I holes + d 2 A)
diameter. Therefore the shear-stress area is As = 144 mm2, and so the shear stress is
15(200) 3 ⎡15(16) 3 ⎤
F 21.0(10)3 = − 2⎢ + 60 2 (15)(16)⎥ = 8.26(10) 6 mm 4
τ= = = 146 MPa 12 ⎢⎣ 12 ⎥⎦
As 144
Then
(c) The channel is thinner than the bar, and so the largest bearing stress is due to the pressing
Mc 5600(100)
of the bolt against the channel web. The bearing area is Ab = td = 10(16) = 160 mm2. Thus σ= = = 67.8 MPa
the bearing stress is 3
I 8.26(10) 6
F 21.0(10)
σ =− =− = −131 MPa
Ab 160
Department of Material and Engineering Design, 119 Department of Material and Engineering Design, 120
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor. University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Johor.
BDA 31203 – Mechanical Component Design CHAPTER 8 – Nonpermanent Joints
References
A–3 Optional SI Units for Bending, Torsion, Axial, and Direct Shear Stresses 963
A–23 Mean Monotonic and Cyclic Stress-Strain Properties of Selected Steels 998
A–25 Stochastic Yield and Ultimate Strengths for Selected Materials 1002
A–26 Stochastic Parameters from Finite Life Fatigue Tests in Selected Metals 1003
959
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:42 PM Page 960
A–27 Finite Life Fatigue Strengths of Selected Plain Carbon Steels 1004
A–30 Dimensions of Hexagonal Cap Screws and Heavy Hexagonal Screws 1008
† Spaces are used in SI instead of commas to group numbers to avoid confusion with the practice in some European countries
Table A–2
Multiply Input By Factor To Get Output Multiply Input By Factor To Get Output
X A Y X A Y
∗ Approximate.
† The U.S. Customary system unit of the pound-force is often abbreviated as lbf to distinguish it from the pound-mass, which is abbreviated as lbm.
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:42 PM Page 963
∗ Basic relation.
† Often preferred.
† Often preferred.
Table A–5
Modulus of Modulus of
Elasticity E Rigidity G Poisson’s Unit Weight w
Material Mpsi GPa Mpsi GPa Ratio v lbf/in3 lbf/ft 3 kN/m3
Aluminum (all alloys) 10.4 71.7 3.9 26.9 0.333 0.098 169 26.6
Beryllium copper 18.0 124.0 7.0 48.3 0.285 0.297 513 80.6
Brass 15.4 106.0 5.82 40.1 0.324 0.309 534 83.8
Carbon steel 30.0 207.0 11.5 79.3 0.292 0.282 487 76.5
Cast iron (gray) 14.5 100.0 6.0 41.4 0.211 0.260 450 70.6
Copper 17.2 119.0 6.49 44.7 0.326 0.322 556 87.3
Douglas fir 1.6 11.0 0.6 4.1 0.33 0.016 28 4.3
Glass 6.7 46.2 2.7 18.6 0.245 0.094 162 25.4
Inconel 31.0 214.0 11.0 75.8 0.290 0.307 530 83.3
Lead 5.3 36.5 1.9 13.1 0.425 0.411 710 111.5
Magnesium 6.5 44.8 2.4 16.5 0.350 0.065 112 17.6
Molybdenum 48.0 331.0 17.0 117.0 0.307 0.368 636 100.0
Monel metal 26.0 179.0 9.5 65.5 0.320 0.319 551 86.6
Nickel silver 18.5 127.0 7.0 48.3 0.322 0.316 546 85.8
Nickel steel 30.0 207.0 11.5 79.3 0.291 0.280 484 76.0
Phosphor bronze 16.1 111.0 6.0 41.4 0.349 0.295 510 80.1
Stainless steel (18-8) 27.6 190.0 10.6 73.1 0.305 0.280 484 76.0
Titanium alloys 16.5 114.0 6.2 42.4 0.340 0.160 276 43.4
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:42 PM Page 964
∗ Metric sizes also available in sizes of 45, 70, 90, 120, and 200 mm.
Table A–7
3 1.410 0.170 1.21 4.1 1.66 1.17 1.10 0.197 0.404 0.202 0.436
3 1.498 0.258 1.47 5.0 1.85 1.12 1.24 0.247 0.410 0.233 0.438
3 1.596 0.356 1.76 6.0 2.07 1.08 1.38 0.305 0.416 0.268 0.455
4 1.580 0.180 1.57 5.4 3.85 1.56 1.93 0.319 0.449 0.283 0.457
4 1.720 0.321 2.13 7.25 4.59 1.47 2.29 0.433 0.450 0.343 0.459
5 1.750 0.190 1.97 6.7 7.49 1.95 3.00 0.479 0.493 0.378 0.484
5 1.885 0.325 2.64 9.0 8.90 1.83 3.56 0.632 0.489 0.450 0.478
6 1.920 0.200 2.40 8.2 13.1 2.34 4.38 0.693 0.537 0.492 0.511
6 2.034 0.314 3.09 10.5 15.2 2.22 5.06 0.866 0.529 0.564 0.499
6 2.157 0.437 3.83 13.0 17.4 2.13 5.80 1.05 0.525 0.642 0.514
7 2.090 0.210 2.87 9.8 21.3 2.72 6.08 0.968 0.581 0.625 0.540
7 2.194 0.314 3.60 12.25 24.2 2.60 6.93 1.17 0.571 0.703 0.525
7 2.299 0.419 4.33 14.75 27.2 2.51 7.78 1.38 0.564 0.779 0.532
8 2.260 0.220 3.36 11.5 32.3 3.10 8.10 1.30 0.625 0.781 0.571
8 2.343 0.303 4.04 13.75 36.2 2.99 9.03 1.53 0.615 0.854 0.553
8 2.527 0.487 5.51 18.75 44.0 2.82 11.0 1.98 0.599 1.01 0.565
9 2.430 0.230 3.91 13.4 47.7 3.49 10.6 1.75 0.669 0.962 0.601
9 2.485 0.285 4.41 15.0 51.0 3.40 11.3 1.93 0.661 1.01 0.586
9 2.648 0.448 5.88 20.0 60.9 3.22 13.5 2.42 0.647 1.17 0.583
10 2.600 0.240 4.49 15.3 67.4 3.87 13.5 2.28 0.713 1.16 0.634
10 2.739 0.379 5.88 20.0 78.9 3.66 15.8 2.81 0.693 1.32 0.606
10 2.886 0.526 7.35 25.0 91.2 3.52 18.2 3.36 0.676 1.48 0.617
10 3.033 0.673 8.82 30.0 103 3.43 20.7 3.95 0.669 1.66 0.649
12 3.047 0.387 7.35 25.0 144 4.43 24.1 4.47 0.780 1.89 0.674
12 3.170 0.510 8.82 30.0 162 4.29 27.0 5.14 0.763 2.06 0.674
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:42 PM Page 967
Table A–7
76 × 38 6.70 5.1 8.53 74.14 2.95 19.46 10.66 1.12 4.07 1.19
102 × 51 10.42 6.1 13.28 207.7 3.95 40.89 29.10 1.48 8.16 1.51
127 × 64 14.90 6.4 18.98 482.5 5.04 75.99 67.23 1.88 15.25 1.94
152 × 76 17.88 6.4 22.77 851.5 6.12 111.8 113.8 2.24 21.05 2.21
152 × 89 23.84 7.1 30.36 1166 6.20 153.0 215.1 2.66 35.70 2.86
178 × 76 20.84 6.6 26.54 1337 7.10 150.4 134.0 2.25 24.72 2.20
178 × 89 26.81 7.6 34.15 1753 7.16 197.2 241.0 2.66 39.29 2.76
203 × 76 23.82 7.1 30.34 1950 8.02 192.0 151.3 2.23 27.59 2.13
203 × 89 29.78 8.1 37.94 2491 8.10 245.2 264.4 2.64 42.34 2.65
229 × 76 26.06 7.6 33.20 2610 8.87 228.3 158.7 2.19 28.22 2.00
229 × 89 32.76 8.6 41.73 3387 9.01 296.4 285.0 2.61 44.82 2.53
254 × 76 28.29 8.1 36.03 3367 9.67 265.1 162.6 2.12 28.21 1.86
254 × 89 35.74 9.1 45.42 4448 9.88 350.2 302.4 2.58 46.70 2.42
305 × 89 41.69 10.2 53.11 7061 11.5 463.3 325.4 2.48 48.49 2.18
305 × 102 46.18 10.2 58.83 8214 11.8 539.0 499.5 2.91 66.59 2.66
∗
These sizes are also available in aluminum alloy.
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:42 PM Page 968
Size, in wa ws A l k Z J
1
1× 8
0.416 1.128 0.344 0.034 0.313 0.067 0.067
1
1× 4
0.713 2.003 0.589 0.046 0.280 0.092 0.092
1 12 × 1
8
0.653 1.769 0.540 0.129 0.488 0.172 0.257
1 12 × 1
4
1.188 3.338 0.982 0.199 0.451 0.266 0.399
1
2× 8
0.891 2.670 0.736 0.325 0.664 0.325 0.650
1
2× 4
1.663 4.673 1.374 0.537 0.625 0.537 1.074
2 12 × 1
8
1.129 3.050 0.933 0.660 0.841 0.528 1.319
2 12 × 1
4
2.138 6.008 1.767 1.132 0.800 0.906 2.276
1
3× 4
2.614 7.343 2.160 2.059 0.976 1.373 4.117
3
3× 8
3.742 10.51 3.093 2.718 0.938 1.812 5.436
3
4× 16
2.717 7.654 2.246 4.090 1.350 2.045 8.180
3
4× 8
5.167 14.52 4.271 7.090 1.289 3.544 14.180
Size, mm m A l k Z J
x
–
2 Cantilever—intermediate load
y
R1 = V = F M1 = Fa
l
a b M A B = F(x − a) MBC = 0
F
A B C F x2
x yA B = (x − 3a)
6E I
M1
Fa 2
R1 yB C = (a − 3x)
6E I
V Fa 2
ymax = (a − 3l)
6E I
+
x
–
(continued)
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:42 PM Page 970
bending moment M +
conventions given in
M
Sec. 4–2.)
x
–
4 Cantilever—moment load
y
R1 = 0 M1 = M B M = MB
l
M1 MB MB x 2 MB l2
y= ymax =
A 2E I 2E I
B x
R1
x
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:42 PM Page 971
x (continued)
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:42 PM Page 972
+
x
– x
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 973
x
–
(continued)
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 974
– x
– x
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 975
conventions given in – x
Sec. 4–2.)
M
l /4
+
– x
+
– – x
(continued)
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 976
+
– – x
M
0.2113l
+
– – x
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 977
Table A–10
Zα 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09
0.0 0.5000 0.4960 0.4920 0.4880 0.4840 0.4801 0.4761 0.4721 0.4681 0.4641
0.1 0.4602 0.4562 0.4522 0.4483 0.4443 0.4404 0.4364 0.4325 0.4286 0.4247
0.2 0.4207 0.4168 0.4129 0.4090 0.4052 0.4013 0.3974 0.3936 0.3897 0.3859
0.3 0.3821 0.3783 0.3745 0.3707 0.3669 0.3632 0.3594 0.3557 0.3520 0.3483
0.4 0.3446 0.3409 0.3372 0.3336 0.3300 0.3264 0.3238 0.3192 0.3156 0.3121
0.5 0.3085 0.3050 0.3015 0.2981 0.2946 0.2912 0.2877 0.2843 0.2810 0.2776
0.6 0.2743 0.2709 0.2676 0.2643 0.2611 0.2578 0.2546 0.2514 0.2483 0.2451
0.7 0.2420 0.2389 0.2358 0.2327 0.2296 0.2266 0.2236 0.2206 0.2177 0.2148
0.8 0.2119 0.2090 0.2061 0.2033 0.2005 0.1977 0.1949 0.1922 0.1894 0.1867
0.9 0.1841 0.1814 0.1788 0.1762 0.1736 0.1711 0.1685 0.1660 0.1635 0.1611
1.0 0.1587 0.1562 0.1539 0.1515 0.1492 0.1469 0.1446 0.1423 0.1401 0.1379
1.1 0.1357 0.1335 0.1314 0.1292 0.1271 0.1251 0.1230 0.1210 0.1190 0.1170
1.2 0.1151 0.1131 0.1112 0.1093 0.1075 0.1056 0.1038 0.1020 0.1003 0.0985
1.3 0.0968 0.0951 0.0934 0.0918 0.0901 0.0885 0.0869 0.0853 0.0838 0.0823
1.4 0.0808 0.0793 0.0778 0.0764 0.0749 0.0735 0.0721 0.0708 0.0694 0.0681
1.5 0.0668 0.0655 0.0643 0.0630 0.0618 0.0606 0.0594 0.0582 0.0571 0.0559
1.6 0.0548 0.0537 0.0526 0.0516 0.0505 0.0495 0.0485 0.0475 0.0465 0.0455
1.7 0.0446 0.0436 0.0427 0.0418 0.0409 0.0401 0.0392 0.0384 0.0375 0.0367
1.8 0.0359 0.0351 0.0344 0.0336 0.0329 0.0322 0.0314 0.0307 0.0301 0.0294
1.9 0.0287 0.0281 0.0274 0.0268 0.0262 0.0256 0.0250 0.0244 0.0239 0.0233
2.0 0.0228 0.0222 0.0217 0.0212 0.0207 0.0202 0.0197 0.0192 0.0188 0.0183
2.1 0.0179 0.0174 0.0170 0.0166 0.0162 0.0158 0.0154 0.0150 0.0146 0.0143
2.2 0.0139 0.0136 0.0132 0.0129 0.0125 0.0122 0.0119 0.0116 0.0113 0.0110
2.3 0.0107 0.0104 0.0102 0.00990 0.00964 0.00939 0.00914 0.00889 0.00866 0.00842
2.4 0.00820 0.00798 0.00776 0.00755 0.00734 0.00714 0.00695 0.00676 0.00657 0.00639
2.5 0.00621 0.00604 0.00587 0.00570 0.00554 0.00539 0.00523 0.00508 0.00494 0.00480
2.6 0.00466 0.00453 0.00440 0.00427 0.00415 0.00402 0.00391 0.00379 0.00368 0.00357
2.7 0.00347 0.00336 0.00326 0.00317 0.00307 0.00298 0.00289 0.00280 0.00272 0.00264
2.8 0.00256 0.00248 0.00240 0.00233 0.00226 0.00219 0.00212 0.00205 0.00199 0.00193
2.9 0.00187 0.00181 0.00175 0.00169 0.00164 0.00159 0.00154 0.00149 0.00144 0.00139
(continued)
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 978
Table A–10
Zα 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
3 0.00135 0.03968 0.03687 0.03483 0.03337 0.03233 0.03159 0.03108 0.04723 0.04481
4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6
4 0.0 317 0.0 207 0.0 133 0.0 854 0.0 541 0.0 340 0.0 211 0.0 130 0.0 793 0.06479
5 0.06287 0.06170 0.07996 0.07579 0.07333 0.07190 0.07107 0.08599 0.08332 0.08182
9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 11
6 0.0 987 0.0 530 0.0 282 0.0 149 0.0 777 0.0 402 0.0 206 0.0 104 0.0 523 0.011260
Table A–12
Table A–14
6/3/03
Fundamental Deviations for Shafts—Inch Series (Size Ranges Are for Over the Lower Limit and Including the Upper Limit. All Values Are in
Inches, Converted from Table A–12)
Basic
Sizes c d f g h k n p s u
981
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 982
Table A–15
2.4
2.2
2.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
d/w
1.4
1.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
d/w
1.4
1.0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
r/d
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 983
Table A–15
Charts of Theoretical Stress-Concentration Factors K*t (Continued)
Kt 1.02
1.8
1.4
1.0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
r/d
Kt
1.05
1.8
1.02
1.4
1.0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
r/d
1.8
1.0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
r/d (continued)
*Factors from R. E. Peterson, “Design Factors for Stress Concentration,” Machine Design, vol. 23, no. 2, February 1951, p. 169; no. 3, March 1951, p. 161, no. 5, May 1951, p. 159; no. 6, June 1951,
p. 173; no. 7, July 1951, p. 155. Reprinted with permission from Machine Design, a Penton Media Inc. publication.
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 984
Table A–15
Kt 1.8 D/d
= 1.
50
1.0 1.10
5
1.4
1.02
1.0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
r/d
2.2
Kts
1.8
1.0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
r/d
2.2
Kt
1.8 D/d
=3
1.5
1.4 1.10 1.02
1.05
1.0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
r/d
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 985
Table A–15
d
Round shaft in torsion with
transverse hole. 3.6 T D
B A
Kts, A J D3 dD2
Kts 3.2 c = 16 – 6 (approx)
Kts, B
2.8
2.4
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
d/D
1.8
1.4
1.0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
d/D
Figure A–15–12 11
1
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
d/w (continued)
*Factors from R. E. Peterson, “Design Factors for Stress Concentration,” Machine Design, vol. 23, no. 2, February 1951, p. 169; no. 3, March 1951, p. 161, no. 5, May 1951, p. 159; no. 6, June 1951,
p. 173; no. 7, July 1951, p. 155. Reprinted with permission from Machine Design, a Penton Media Inc. publication.
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 986
Table A–15
2.2
Kt
1.02 D/d = 1.50
1.8
1.4
1.0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
r/d
1.4
1.0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
r/d
1.8
Kts 1.05
D/d = 1.30
1.4
1.02
1.0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
r/d
*Factors from R. E. Peterson, “Design Factors for Stress Concentration,” Machine Design, vol. 23, no. 2, February 1951, p. 169; no. 3, March 1951, p. 161, no. 5, May 1951, p. 159; no. 6, June 1951,
p. 173; no. 7, July 1951, p. 155. Reprinted with permission from Machine Design, a Penton Media Inc. publication.
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 987
a
Table A–16
Approximate Stress- D d
Concentration Factor Kt
M M
for Bending of a Round
Bar or Tube with a
The nominal bending stress is σ0 = M/Z net where Z net is a reduced value
Transverse Round Hole of the section modulus and is defined by
Source: R. E. Peterson, Stress
Concentration Factors, Wiley, πA
Z net = (D 4 − d 4 )
New York, 1974, pp. 146, 32D
235.
d/D
0.9 0.6 0
a/D A Kt A Kt A Kt
(continued)
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 988
Approximate Stress-Concentration Factors Kts for a Round Bar or Tube Having a Transverse Round Hole and
Loaded in Torsion Source: R. E. Peterson, Stress Concentration Factors, Wiley, New York, 1974, pp. 148, 244.
D a d
T
T
The maximum stress occurs on the inside of the hole, slightly below the shaft surface. The nominal shear stress is τ0 = T D/2Jnet ,
where Jnet is a reduced value of the second polar moment of area and is defined by
π A(D 4 − d 4 )
Jnet =
32
Values of A are listed in the table. Use d = 0 for a solid bar.
d/D
0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0
a/D A Kts A Kts A Kts A Kts A Kts
Millimeters
0.05, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, 0.12, 0.16, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.40, 0.50, 0.60, 0.70, 0.80,
0.90, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 2.2, 2.5, 2.8, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5,
6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 25, 28, 30, 32, 35, 40, 45, 50,
60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 250, 300
Renard Numbers*
Rectangle y
b
2
h x
G h
2
b
bh 3 b3 h
A = bh Ix = Iy = Ix y = 0
12 12
Circle y
D
G x
π D2 π D4
A= Ix = I y = Ix y = 0
4 64
Hollow circle y
d D
x
G
π 2 π
A= (D − d 2 ) Ix = I y = (D 4 − d 4 ) Ix y = 0
4 64
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 991
Table A–18
y y
Geometric Properties Right triangles
b b
(Continued) 3
h
3
G x
h h
G h x
3
b
b
3
bh bh 3 b3 h −b2 h 2
A= Ix = Iy = Ix y =
2 36 36 72
y y
Right triangles
b
b
3
h
3
G x
h h
h G x
3
b
b
3
bh bh 3 b3 h b2 h 2
A= Ix = Iy = Ix y =
2 36 36 72
Quarter-circles y y
4r
3 r
4r
3
G x
G 4r x
3
r 4r
3
πr 2 π 4 1 4
A= Ix = I y = r 4 − Ix y = r 4 −
4 16 9π 8 9π
Quarter-circles y y
4r
r 3
4r
3
G x
4r G x
3
4r r
3
πr 2 π 4 4 1
A= Ix = I y = r 4
− Ix y = r 4
−
4 16 9π 9π 8
(continued)
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 992
Table A–18 Part 2 Properties of Solids (ρ = Density, Weight per Unit Volume)
Geometric Properties Rods y
(Continued)
d
z l
x
πd 2 lρ ml 2
m= I y = Iz =
4g 12
y
Round disks
t
d
x
z
πd 2 tρ md 2 md 2
m= Ix = I y = Iz =
4g 8 16
y
Rectangular prisms
z c
a x
abcρ m 2 m 2 m 2
m= Ix = (a + b2 ) Iy = (a + c2 ) Iz = (b + c2 )
g 12 12 12
y
Cylinders
d
z l
x
πd 2 lρ md 2 m
m= Ix = I y = Iz = (3d 2 + 4l 2 )
4g 8 48
y
Hollow cylinders
di
do
z l
x
π do2 − di2 lρ m 2 m 2
m= Ix = do + di2 I y = Iz = 3do + 3di2 + 4l 2
4g 8 48
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 993
Table A–20
Deterministic ASTM Minimum Tensile and Yield Strengths for Some Hot-Rolled (HR) and Cold-Drawn (CD) Steels
[The strengths listed are estimated ASTM minimum values in the size range 18 to 32 mm ( 34 to 1 14 in). These
strengths are suitable for use with the design factor defined in Sec. 1–10, provided the materials conform to
ASTM A6 or A568 requirements or are required in the purchase specifications. Remember that a numbering
system is not a specification. See Table 1–1 for certain ASTM steels.] Source: 1986 SAE Handbook, p. 2.15.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Tensile Yield
SAE and/or Proces- Strength, Strength, Elongation in Reduction in Brinell
UNS No. AISI No. sing MPa (kpsi) MPa (kpsi) 2 in, % Area, % Hardness
Table A–21
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Tensile Yield
Temperature Strength Strength, Elongation, Reduction Brinell
AISI No. Treatment °C (°F) MPa (kpsi) MPa (kpsi) % in Area, % Hardness
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Tensile Yield
Temperature Strength Strength, Elongation, Reduction Brinell
AISI No. Treatment °C (°F) MPa (kpsi) MPa (kpsi) % in Area, % Hardness
*Water-quenched
shi20361_app_A.qxd
6/3/03
Table A–22
Results of Tensile Tests of Some Metals* Source: J. Datsko, “Solid Materials,” chap. 7 in Joseph E. Shigley and Charles R. Mischke (eds.-in-chief), Standard
3:43 PM
Handbook of Machine Design, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996, pp. 7.47–7.50.
Strength (Tensile)
Yield Ultimate Fracture, Coefficient Strain
Page 997
1018 Steel Annealed 220 (32.0) 341 (49.5) 628 (91.1)† 620 (90.0) 0.25 1.05
1144 Steel Annealed 358 (52.0) 646 (93.7) 898 (130)† 992 (144) 0.14 0.49
†
1212 Steel HR 193 (28.0) 424 (61.5) 729 (106) 758 (110) 0.24 0.85
1045 Steel Q&T 600°F 1520 (220) 1580 (230) 2380 (345) 1880 (273)† 0.041 0.81
4142 Steel Q&T 600°F 1720 (250) 1930 (210) 2340 (340) 1760 (255)† 0.048 0.43
†
303 Stainless Annealed 241 (35.0) 601 (87.3) 1520 (221) 1410 (205) 0.51 1.16
steel
304 Stainless Annealed 276 (40.0) 568 (82.4) 1600 (233)† 1270 (185) 0.45 1.67
steel
2011 Aluminum T6 169 (24.5) 324 (47.0) 325 (47.2)† 620 (90) 0.28 0.10
alloy
2024 Aluminum T4 296 (43.0) 446 (64.8) 533 (77.3)† 689 (100) 0.15 0.18
alloy
7075 Aluminum T6 542 (78.6) 593 (86.0) 706 (102)† 882 (128) 0.13 0.18
alloy
*Values from one or two heats and believed to be attainable using proper purchase specifications. The fracture strain may vary as much as 100 percent.
†
Derived value.
997
Table A–23
998
Mean Monotonic and Cyclic Stress-Strain Properties of Selected Steels Source: ASM Metals Reference Book, 2nd ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park,
Ohio, 1983, p. 217.
shi20361_app_A.qxd
True Fatigue
Tensile Strain Strength Fatigue Fatigue Fatigue
6/3/03
Hard- Strength
Reduction at Modulus of Coefficient Strength Ductility Ductility
Orienta- Description ness Sut
in Area Fracture Elasticity E σ f Exponent Coefficient Exponent
4
Grade (a) tion (e) (f) HB MPa ksi % εf GPa 10 psi MPa ksi b εF c
3:43 PM
A538A (b) L STA 405 1515 220 67 1.10 185 27 1655 240 −0.065 0.30 −0.62
A538B (b) L STA 460 1860 270 56 0.82 185 27 2135 310 −0.071 0.80 −0.71
A538C (b) L STA 480 2000 290 55 0.81 180 26 2240 325 −0.07 0.60 −0.75
AM-350 (c) L HR, A 1315 191 52 0.74 195 28 2800 406 −0.14 0.33 −0.84
Page 998
AM-350 (c) L CD 496 1905 276 20 0.23 180 26 2690 390 −0.102 0.10 −0.42
Gainex (c) LT HR sheet 530 77 58 0.86 200 29.2 805 117 −0.07 0.86 −0.65
Gainex (c) L HR sheet 510 74 64 1.02 200 29.2 805 117 −0.071 0.86 −0.68
H-11 L Ausformed 660 2585 375 33 0.40 205 30 3170 460 −0.077 0.08 −0.74
RQC-100 (c) LT HR plate 290 940 136 43 0.56 205 30 1240 180 −0.07 0.66 −0.69
RQC-100 (c) L HR plate 290 930 135 67 1.02 205 30 1240 180 −0.07 0.66 −0.69
10B62 L Q&T 430 1640 238 38 0.89 195 28 1780 258 −0.067 0.32 −0.56
1005-1009 LT HR sheet 90 360 52 73 1.3 205 30 580 84 −0.09 0.15 −0.43
1005-1009 LT CD sheet 125 470 68 66 1.09 205 30 515 75 −0.059 0.30 −0.51
1005-1009 L CD sheet 125 415 60 64 1.02 200 29 540 78 −0.073 0.11 −0.41
1005-1009 L HR sheet 90 345 50 80 1.6 200 29 640 93 −0.109 0.10 −0.39
1015 L Normalized 80 415 60 68 1.14 205 30 825 120 −0.11 0.95 −0.64
1020 L HR plate 108 440 64 62 0.96 205 29.5 895 130 −0.12 0.41 −0.51
1040 L As forged 225 620 90 60 0.93 200 29 1540 223 −0.14 0.61 −0.57
1045 L Q&T 225 725 105 65 1.04 200 29 1225 178 −0.095 1.00 −0.66
1045 L Q&T 410 1450 210 51 0.72 200 29 1860 270 −0.073 0.60 −0.70
1045 L Q&T 390 1345 195 59 0.89 205 30 1585 230 −0.074 0.45 −0.68
1045 L Q&T 450 1585 230 55 0.81 205 30 1795 260 −0.07 0.35 −0.69
1045 L Q&T 500 1825 265 51 0.71 205 30 2275 330 −0.08 0.25 −0.68
1045 L Q&T 595 2240 325 41 0.52 205 30 2725 395 −0.081 0.07 −0.60
1144 L CDSR 265 930 135 33 0.51 195 28.5 1000 145 −0.08 0.32 −0.58
1144 L DAT 305 1035 150 25 0.29 200 28.8 1585 230 −0.09 0.27 −0.53
1541F L Q&T forging 290 950 138 49 0.68 205 29.9 1275 185 −0.076 0.68 −0.65
shi20361_app_A.qxd
1541F L Q&T forging 260 890 129 60 0.93 205 29.9 1275 185 −0.071 0.93 −0.65
4130 L Q&T 258 895 130 67 1.12 220 32 1275 185 −0.083 0.92 −0.63
6/3/03
4130 L Q&T 365 1425 207 55 0.79 200 29 1695 246 −0.081 0.89 −0.69
4140 L Q&T, DAT 310 1075 156 60 0.69 200 29.2 1825 265 −0.08 1.2 −0.59
4142 L DAT 310 1060 154 29 0.35 200 29 1450 210 −0.10 0.22 −0.51
4142 L DAT 335 1250 181 28 0.34 200 28.9 1250 181 0.06
3:43 PM
−0.08 −0.62
4142 L Q&T 380 1415 205 48 0.66 205 30 1825 265 −0.08 0.45 −0.75
4142 L Q&T and 400 1550 225 47 0.63 200 29 1895 275 −0.09 0.50 −0.75
deformed
Page 999
4142 L Q&T 450 1760 255 42 0.54 205 30 2000 290 −0.08 0.40 −0.73
4142 L Q&T and 475 2035 295 20 0.22 200 29 2070 300 −0.082 0.20 −0.77
deformed
4142 L Q&T and 450 1930 280 37 0.46 200 29 2105 305 −0.09 0.60 −0.76
deformed
4142 L Q&T 475 1930 280 35 0.43 205 30 2170 315 −0.081 0.09 −0.61
4142 L Q&T 560 2240 325 27 0.31 205 30 2655 385 −0.089 0.07 −0.76
4340 L HR, A 243 825 120 43 0.57 195 28 1200 174 −0.095 0.45 −0.54
4340 L Q&T 409 1470 213 38 0.48 200 29 2000 290 −0.091 0.48 −0.60
4340 L Q&T 350 1240 180 57 0.84 195 28 1655 240 −0.076 0.73 −0.62
5160 L Q&T 430 1670 242 42 0.87 195 28 1930 280 −0.071 0.40 −0.57
52100 L SH, Q&T 518 2015 292 11 0.12 205 30 2585 375 −0.09 0.18 −0.56
9262 L A 260 925 134 14 0.16 205 30 1040 151 −0.071 0.16 −0.47
9262 L Q&T 280 1000 145 33 0.41 195 28 1220 177 −0.073 0.41 −0.60
9262 L Q&T 410 565 227 32 0.38 200 29 1855 269 −0.057 0.38 −0.65
950C (d) LT HR plate 159 565 82 64 1.03 205 29.6 1170 170 −0.12 0.95 −0.61
950C (d) L HR bar 150 565 82 69 1.19 205 30 970 141 −0.11 0.85 −0.59
950X (d) L Plate channel 150 440 64 65 1.06 205 30 625 91 −0.075 0.35 −0.54
950X (d) L HR plate 156 530 77 72 1.24 205 29.5 1005 146 −0.10 0.85 −0.61
950X (d) L Plate channel 225 695 101 68 1.15 195 28.2 1055 153 −0.08 0.21 −0.53
Notes: (a) AISI/SAE grade, unless otherwise indicated. (b) ASTM designation. (c) Proprietary designation. (d) SAE HSLA grade. (e) Orientation of axis of specimen, relative to rolling direction; L is longitudinal (parallel to rolling direction); LT is long transverse (perpendicular
to rolling direction). (f) STA, solution treated and aged; HR, hot rolled; CD, cold drawn; Q&T, quenched and tempered; CDSR, cold drawn strain relieved; DAT, drawn at temperature; A, annealed.
From ASM Metals Reference Book, 2nd edition, 1983; ASM International, Materials Park, OH 44073-0002; table 217. Reprinted by permission of ASM International ®, www.asminternational.org.
999
1000
shi20361_app_A.qxd
6/3/03
Table A–24
Fatigue
Shear Stress-
Tensile Compressive Modulus Modulus of Endurance Brinell Concentration
ASTM Strength Strength of Rupture Elasticity, Mpsi Limit* Hardness Factor
Number Sut, kpsi Suc, kpsi Ssu, kpsi Tension† Torsion Se, kpsi HB Kf
Table A–24
Wrought:
2017 O 70 (10) 179 (26) 90 (13) 22 45
2024 O 76 (11) 186 (27) 90 (13) 22 47
T3 345 (50) 482 (70) 138 (20) 16 120
3003 H12 117 (17) 131 (19) 55 (8) 20 35
H16 165 (24) 179 (26) 65 (9.5) 14 47
3004 H34 186 (27) 234 (34) 103 (15) 12 63
H38 234 (34) 276 (40) 110 (16) 6 77
5052 H32 186 (27) 234 (34) 117 (17) 18 62
H36 234 (34) 269 (39) 124 (18) 10 74
Cast:
319.0* T6 165 (24) 248 (36) 69 (10) 2.0 80
†
333.0 T5 172 (25) 234 (34) 83 (12) 1.0 100
T6 207 (30) 289 (42) 103 (15) 1.5 105
335.0* T6 172 (25) 241 (35) 62 (9) 3.0 80
T7 248 (36) 262 (38) 62 (9) 0.5 85
*Sand casting.
†
Permanent-mold casting.
†
Commercially pure alpha titanium
1001
Table A–25
1002
Stochastic Yield and Ultimate Strengths for Selected Materials Source: Data compiled from “Some Property Data and
Corresponding Weibull Parameters for Stochastic Mechanical Design,” Trans. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 114
shi20361_app_A.qxd
1018 CD 87.6 5.74 30.8 90.1 12 78.4 5.90 56 80.6 4.29 0.0655 0.0753
1035 HR 86.2 3.92 72.6 87.5 3.86 49.6 3.81 39.5 50.8 2.88 0.0455 0.0768
1045 CD 117.7 7.13 90.2 120.5 4.38 95.5 6.59 82.1 97.2 2.14 0.0606 0.0690
3:43 PM
1117 CD 83.1 5.25 73.0 84.4 2.01 81.4 4.71 72.4 82.6 2.00 0.0632 0.0579
1137 CD 106.5 6.15 96.2 107.7 1.72 98.1 4.24 92.2 98.7 1.41 0.0577 0.0432
12L14 CD 79.6 6.92 70.3 80.4 1.36 78.1 8.27 64.3 78.8 1.72 0.0869 0.1059
Page 1002
Table A–26
3:43 PM
Stochastic Parameters for Finite Life Fatigue Tests in Selected Metals Source: E. B. Haugen, Probabilistic Mechanical Design, Wiley, New York, 1980,
Appendix 10–B.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Stress Cycles to Failure
Page 1003
TS YS Distri-
Number Condition MPa (kpsi) MPa (kpsi) bution 104 105 106 107
1046 WQ&T, 1210°F 723 (105) 565 (82) W x0 544 (79) 462 (67) 391 (56.7)
θ 594 (86.2) 503 (73.0) 425 (61.7)
b 2.60 2.75 2.85
2340 OQ&T 1200°F 799 (116) 661 (96) W x0 579 (84) 510 (74) 420 (61)
θ 699 (101.5) 588 (85.4) 496 (72.0)
b 4.3 3.4 4.1
3140 OQ&T, 1300°F 744 (108) 599 (87) W x0 510 (74) 455 (66) 393 (57)
θ 604 (87.7) 528 (76.7) 463 (67.2)
b 5.2 5.0 5.5
2024 T-4 489 (71) 365 (53) N σ 26.3 (3.82) 21.4 (3.11) 17.4 (2.53) 14.0 (2.03)
Aluminum µ 143 (20.7) 116 (16.9) 95 (13.8) 77 (11.2)
Ti-6A1-4V HT-46 1040 (151) 992 (144) N σ 39.6 (5.75) 38.1 (5.53) 36.6 (5.31) 35.1 (5.10)
µ 712 (108) 684 (99.3) 657 (95.4) 493 (71.6)
Statistical parameters from a large number of fatigue tests are listed. Weibull distribution is denoted W and the parameters are x0, “guaranteed” fatigue strength; θ, characteristic fatigue strength; and b, shape factor. Normal distribution is denoted N and the
parameters are µ, mean fatigue strength; and σ, standard deviation of the fatigue strength. The life is in stress-cycles-to-failure. TS = tensile strength, YS = yield strength. All testing by rotating-beam specimen.
1003
1004
shi20361_app_A.qxd
Table A–27
Finite Life Fatigue Strengths of Selected Plain Carbon Steels Source: Compiled from Table 4 in H. J. Grover, S. A. Gordon,
and L. R. Jackson, Fatigue of Metals and Structures, Bureau of Naval Weapons Document NAVWEPS 00-25-534, 1960.
6/3/03
Tensile Yield
Strength Strength Stress Cycles to Failure
4 4
3:43 PM
Material Condition BHN* kpsi kpsi RA* 10 4(10 ) 105 4(105) 106 4(106) 107 108
Decimal Equivalents of Wire and Sheet-Metal Gauges* (All Sizes Are Given in Inches)
Steel Wire
6/3/03
1005
(continued)
Table A–28
1006
Decimal Equivalents of Wire and Sheet-Metal Gauges* (All Sizes Are Given in Inches) (Continued)
shi20361_app_A.qxd
Steel Wire
Name American Birmingham United Manu- or Stubs
of or Brown or Stubs States facturers Washburn Music Steel Twist
Gauge: & Sharpe Iron Wire Standard † Standard & Moen Wire Wire Drill
6/3/03
Tubing,
Ferrous Ferrous Ferrous
Nonferrous Strip, Flat Sheet and Wire Steel Twist
3:43 PM
Principal Sheet, Wire, Wire, and Plate, Ferrous Except Music Drill Drills and
Use: and Rod Spring Steel 480 lbf/ft3 Sheet Music Wire Wire Rod Drill Steel
*Specify sheet, wire, and plate by stating the gauge number, the gauge name, and the decimal equivalent in parentheses.
†
Reflects present average and weights of sheet steel.
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 1007
Table A–29
W
R
Head Type
Nominal Square Regular Hexagonal Heavy Hexagonal Structural Hexagonal
Size, in W H W H Rmin W H Rmin W H Rmin
1 3 11 7 11
4 8 64 16 64
0.01
5 1 13 1 7
16 2 64 2 32
0.01
3 9 1 9 1
8 16 4 16 4
0.01
7 5 19 5 19
16 8 64 8 64
0.01
1 3 21 3 11 7 11 7 5
2 4 64 4 32
0.01 8 32
0.01 8 16
0.009
5 15 27 15 27 1 27 1 25
8 16 64 16 64
0.02 1 16 64
0.02 1 16 64
0.021
3
4
1 18 1
2
1 18 1
2
0.02 1 14 1
2
0.02 1 14 15
32
0.021
1 1 12 21
32
1 12 43
64
0.03 1 58 43
64
0.03 1 58 39
64
0.062
1 18 1 11
16
3
4
1 11
16
3
4
0.03 1 13
16
3
4
0.03 1 13
16
11
16
0.062
1 14 1 78 27
32
1 78 27
32
0.03 2 27
32
0.03 2 25
32
0.062
1 38 1
2 16 29
32
1
2 16 29
32
0.03 3
2 16 29
32
0.03 3
2 16 27
32
0.062
1 12 2 14 1 2 14 1 0.03 2 38 1 0.03 2 38 15
16
0.062
Nominal
Size, mm
Screws (W = Width 5
16
0.015 1
2
13
64
across Flats; H = Height 3
0.015 9 15
8 16 64
of Head; See Figure 7
0.015 5 9
16 8 32
in Table A–29) 1 3 7 5
2
0.015 4 8 16
5 15 1 25
8
0.020 16
1 16 64
3
4
0.020 1 18 1 14 15
32
7 5 7 35
8
0.040 1 16 1 16 64
1 0.060 1 12 1 18 39
64
1 14 0.060 1 78 2 25
32
1 38 0.060 1
2 16 3
2 16 27
32
1 12 0.060 2 14 2 38 15
16
Nominal
Size, mm
M5 0.2 8 3.65
M6 0.3 10 4.15
M8 0.4 13 5.50
M10 0.4 16 6.63
M12 0.6 18 21 7.76
M14 0.6 21 24 9.09
M16 0.6 24 27 10.32
M20 0.8 30 34 12.88
M24 0.8 36 41 15.44
M30 1.0 46 50 19.48
M36 1.0 55 60 23.38
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 1009
1 1 12 55
64
1 35
64
1 18 1 11
16
31
32
5
1 32 39
64
1 14 1 78 1
1 16 1 14 23
32
1 38 1
2 16 1 11
64
1 38 25
32
1 12 2 14 9
1 32 1 12 27
32
Nominal
Size, mm
1010
shi20361_app_A.qxd 6/3/03 3:43 PM Page 1011
Table A–33
∞
Table A–34 Values of (n) = e−x x n−1 dx; (n + 1) = n(n)
0
Gamma Function*
Source: Reprinted with n (n) n (n) n (n) n (n)
permission from William H.
Beyer (ed.), Handbook of 1.00 1.000 00 1.25 .906 40 1.50 .886 23 1.75 .919 06
Tables for Probability and 1.01 .994 33 1.26 .904 40 1.51 .886 59 1.76 .921 37
Statistics, 2nd ed., 1966.
Copyright CRC Press, Boca
1.02 .988 84 1.27 .902 50 1.52 .887 04 1.77 .923 76
Raton, Florida. 1.03 .983 55 1.28 .900 72 1.53 .887 57 1.78 .926 23
1.04 .978 44 1.29 .899 04 1.54 .888 18 1.79 .928 77
1.05 .973 50 1.30 .897 47 1.55 .888 87 1.80 .931 38
1.06 .968 74 1.31 .896 00 1.56 .889 64 1.81 .934 08
1.07 .964 15 1.32 .894 64 1.57 .890 49 1.82 .936 85
1.08 .959 73 1.33 .893 38 1.58 .891 42 1.83 .939 69
1.09 .955 46 1.34 .892 22 1.59 .892 43 1.84 .942 61
1.10 .951 35 1.35 .891 15 1.60 .893 52 1.85 .945 61
1.11 .947 39 1.36 .890 18 1.61 .894 68 1.86 .948 69
1.12 .943 59 1.37 .889 31 1.62 .895 92 1.87 .951 84
1.13 .939 93 1.38 .888 54 1.63 .897 24 1.88 .955 07
1.14 .936 42 1.39 .887 85 1.64 .898 64 1.89 .958 38
1.15 .933 04 1.40 .887 26 1.65 .900 12 1.90 .961 77
1.16 .929 80 1.41 .886 76 1.66 .901 67 1.91 .965 23
1.17 .936 70 1.42 .886 36 1.67 .903 30 1.92 .968 78
1.18 .923 73 1.43 .886 04 1.68 .905 00 1.93 .972 40
1.19 .920 88 1.44 .885 80 1.69 .906 78 1.94 .976 10
1.20 .918 17 1.45 .885 65 1.70 .908 64 1.95 .979 88
1.21 .915 58 1.46 .885 60 1.71 .910 57 1.96 .983 74
1.22 .913 11 1.47 .885 63 1.72 .912 58 1.97 .987 68
1.23 .910 75 1.48 .885 75 1.73 .914 66 1.98 .991 71
1.24 .908 52 1.49 .885 95 1.74 .916 83 1.99 .995 81
2.00 1.000 00