Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Paul Sarsfield
Every day, there are a multitude of decisions that are made within schools: What
determines a passing grade? What population, demographic or skillset needs more support?
What kind of support is needed and how will it be delivered? A framework of multi-tier
system of supports (MTSS) are made by these teams—building leadership teams, student
support teams, or grade-level teams to name a few. MTSS decisions are made using a team-
based process.
MTSS decisions at the Tier 1 building level are focused on balancing the needs of the
entire student population and the resources available to the building. Critical areas for teams
to examine include identification of student needs and the effectiveness of the core
instruction or the instruction that all students receive every day. A few benefits at this level
include providing information to a large group of students at the same time, taking questions
that many are quietly wondering about and establishing a vision for the school year. Schools
can make flyers and/or newsletters to send home, post banners and newsletters around the
school, make announcements over the speaker or using the audio/video department,
pushing information onto school laptops and at assemblies. These can easily be tailored
from the situations, issues or concerns from the data pulled and translated for the
populations at the school and the community. Assemblies can re-enforce the above and
incorporate school vision, mission statements, and esprit de corps to bring students
together. Challenges that affect this level include students not paying attention, not wanting
to ask questions in fear of being singled out or teased and can simply not be read.
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support
At the tier 2 building level, it is now focused on smaller group populations affected by
an aspect within the previous tier. It is now focusing on a distant population that would
work well together by learning from each other, sharing with each other and supporting
each other, from a similar concern, issue or situation. Benefits coming from this tier could
include bonding within the students, normalizing feelings and being able to target behaviors
and seeing growth over time. Using classroom presentations can hit larger amounts of
people, but still be small enough to elicit questions and group activities. Small groups can be
focused more on growth and more specific tier 2 scenarios. Challenges can be finding
students that would work well together, getting people to open up and finding time within
who show a need for individualized help stemming from the two previous tiers. A plethora of
benefits at this level includes individualized attention to assist with the situation, watching
the student overcome the situation over time and building trust levels up. The challenges
are just as many, with students giving up, parents not supporting, and taking a lot of time
For parents and families, providing an overview in important, so they can (hopefully)
support the work at home. How is their student being successful? How do they know?
What can they do to participate in the problem-solving areas and how interventions are
working? The more people on board, the more successful the student will be. Show the
parents that the school is open for their support. Progress reports and teacher and
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support
counselor conferences can be direct links. Celebrate when a progress is made, asking
For a counselor, the MTSS ties well into the ASCA way of life. We are uniquely
positioned to play a critical role in the implementation of these programs, using data
analysis, program development, and direct service deliveries. Themes of social justice,
advocacy and systemic change embedded in topics can remove barriers to students' success
and help students reach their potential. We collaborate with others and pull data to find out
what is going on in our schools. This process is cyclical as school years and their issues
fluctuate, so finding the pulse earlier and getting team development and planning is critical.
At a high school, where multiple requirements for advanced placement (AP) classes, a
limited number of classes, programs such as running start, alternative classes and the mirage
of other responsibilities a counselor faces every day, can really hinder the effectiveness of a
interpreting data and then using it to make tiered instructional material that establishes
support for the school. For example, the steps in the processes above should be coordinated
through an MTSS building leadership team (one which my high school does not have). The
MTSS building leadership team should be responsible for coordinating and communicating
all MTSS implementation efforts for the building. The MTSS building leadership team uses a
problem-solving process at both the system and student levels. For example, at the system
level, the team could ask ‘is the core instruction effective?’ At the student level, the team
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support
would ask which students need additional support? Teams look at both system-and student-
level problems by asking 1) What is the problem? 2) Why is the problem occurring? 3) What
should we do about the problem? and 4) Did our solution work? This all ties back into the
In order to best support our students, we must have strong leadership, work as
advocates, and use the models within ASCA. Doing so will improve the process of
collaboration/buy-in from other educators, the students, and their parents and will
strengthen the efforts to best support the success of all our students.