Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Roll.No: 181708
2.1 Objective:
To determine the delay at intersection, for individual vehicle types and in each direction
for different volume data.
To plot graph between delay and volume
PTV Vissim
2.3 Procedure:
Step 1: A four legged 4-lane divided intersection has been created and for each leg, left and
right turning were assigned.
Step 2: Add the Vehicle 2D/3D model segments using Base data, different vehicle types and
number of vehicles added to the section and then vehicle distribution should be done.
Step 4: Vehicle routing has been assigned based on their direction, routing has done for all the
3 directions (straight, left and right turns).
Vehicle inputs for all four legs has been assigned and different volumes were given for
corresponding vehicle composition.
Step 6: Nodes has been assigned for intersection, and conflicts points has been resolved and
priorities has been given based on their direction and volume.
Table 2.1 Observed intersection, direction and vehicle type delays for different volumes
Volume (veh/hr)
Delay (sec/veh) 600 1000 1600 2400 2600 2800 3100 3300 3500 3700
Total intersection 0.19 0.34 0.84 2.28 2.73 3.86 10.30 15.45 16.67 19.93
Cycle (=610) 0.34 0.34 1.64 2.61 1.65 2.62 6.16 7.61 9.21 18.45
Car (=620) 0.11 0.27 0.64 1.84 2.35 3.81 11.23 17.43 18.29 21.67
Bus (=630) 0.35 0.26 0.93 1.98 2.44 3.31 7.59 11.70 13.67 13.80
Bike (=640) 0.19 0.43 0.87 2.69 3.26 4.22 10.83 16.04 17.48 20.80
E-N 0.00 0.52 0.66 1.57 1.18 2.41 5.44 5.57 6.56 8.92
E-S 0.00 0.13 0.59 1.11 1.29 2.78 2.87 2.92 4.78 6.73
E-W 0.34 0.42 0.76 2.02 1.85 2.85 3.04 4.16 5.51 5.90
N-E 0.02 0.17 0.35 0.77 1.88 3.48 8.19 15.20 19.03 18.55
N-S 0.15 0.18 0.53 1.59 2.02 4.86 10.97 19.40 20.28 23.51
N-W 0.13 0.04 0.39 1.85 3.34 5.48 15.27 25.83 27.16 29.98
S-E 0.18 0.86 2.18 4.82 4.5 5.12 11.09 16.83 19.67 29.35
S-N 0.50 0.86 1.60 4.59 4.66 5.5 12.88 15.87 18.45 24.24
S-W 0.28 0.32 1.35 3.88 3.41 2.85 9.37 13.32 14.23 18.96
W-E 0.13 0.18 0.60 1.41 1.96 3.49 9.85 16.65 18.42 22.03
W-N 0.08 0.16 0.30 1.21 2.44 3.58 10.42 16.48 15.56 18.40
W-S 0.32 0.60 1.37 3.42 4.93 5.76 21.54 31.05 35.15 43.12
20.00
Intersection delay (sec/veh)
18.00
16.00
14.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
volume (veh/hr)
2.5 Comments:
From the graphs it can be concluded that as volume increases the delay also increasing
(as more vehicle accommodate near intersection).
As bike composition given was high, it is taking more time to cross the intersection, so
delay is high as volume is increasing.(From the table)
Compared to all directions, W-S direction delay was high, because it was considered as
one of major route and volume given for this route is high.