Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
of H A N O V E R
STREETSCAPE
Prepared by:
Simone Collins Landscape Architecture Design & Beautification Plan
Barton & Loguidice December 2018 Draft
Committee
Drew Derreth
Patty Hegberg
Matthew Hutton
Barbara Rupp
Borough Manager
Michael Bowersox
Borough Council
Brian J. Shea
Heath Chesney
William W. Reichart II Project Consultants
R. Daniel Noble
Jeanine Pranses
Ray Hoover
Brian O’Neill
Barbara A. Rupp
James E. Baumgardner
Christopher Lockard
Ra
ilr
here within the civic and commercial heart of the Borough.
oa
d
St
All roadways within the Center Square are state highways,
.
and any modification proposed for the primary cartways
t.
tS
– whether modernizing the current “crossroads”
nu
st
e
Ch
intersection or re-establishing a modern roundabout
e.
Do
Av
ss
rk
Pa
version of the historic center circle must be
Al
le
y
t.
process.
lS
ai P8 P7
G
y
P9 Sch
dwa
Fr
ool A
Legend
an
ve.
kli
Broa
n
Ra
.
St
Ln
ilr
Project Area
.
oa
nk P6
Ba
d
Center Square
St
t.
.
State Road
le S
Local Street
Midd
Green Alley
Green Core
Planting Buffer
Ca
Building
rli
York
ay
sle
St.
Public Parking P1 dw
oa
St
Private Parking
P1 Br Modern Roundabout Alternative
.
Driveway
Ra
Private Green Space .
ilr
e
Av
oa
Decorative Crosswalk P2 P4
d
ge York
St
Standard Crosswalk l le
Do
St.
.
Co
.
Ex. Tree (mature)
t St
ss
t.
A
lnu
lle
ic P3
y
Proposed Tree er
Wa
Ba
ed
ltim
Bench Fr
t.
or
t S Curb Cut
ADA
e
nu
St
Fr
st Bus Shelter
.
an
e
Ch Traffic Signal
kli
n
St
P5
Traffic Direction
State Route P10 .
Pl
ge
The geometric options E xc
han
.
nt
ut
ni
aln
Ra
al
ilr
.
oa
d
traffic and local traffic patterns through the downtown core.
.
St
St
.
e
dl
id
M
Once the preferred vehicular network is identified for the state and local roads
in the central business district, then the options for streetscape treatments and
Do
amenities can be assessed for feasibility and community preferences, and the roadway
ss
Al
le
geometry can be developed to ensure that it creates the best possible opportunities to
y
Ba
ltim
.
St
ut
or
aln
e
Streetscape Plan
St
W
.
Study Area
The Streetscape study area represents a portion of the Main Street District (Central Business Task 1: Design Alternatives / Feasibility for Traffic Patterns
District) that is walkable with a high concentration of retail and commercial business that
Task 2: Parking Evaluation
comprises twenty-two blocks surrounding Center Square in downtown Hanover Borough. Both
the main Street District and the Streetscape study area are aligned with major state arteries Task 3: Conceptual Alternative Designs
leading into Hanover, including 94, 116, and 194. Task 4: Public Involvement Meetings
Task 5: Project Report / Deliverables
Project Tasks Within those five primary tasks, a wide variety streetscape program elements and alternative
The professional team of Simone Collins Landscape Architecture and Barton & Loguidice was treatments were identified and assessed, including:
selected by the Borough of Hanover, with input from Main Street Hanover and the community •Traffic engineering, roadway geometry, and traffic calming possibilities, •Multi-modal
to help refine the community’s vision; plan for streetscape improvements; prepare conceptual transportation / ADA needs •Stormwater management, green infrastructure
design drawings and preliminary costs for construction phases. Project tasks included: •Urban landscape design options
HANOVER
HANOVER
Final engineering is conducted to complete Borough will be designed to produce a discrete and
comprehensive transportation elements – such as a new usable facility at the end of the construction phase. Most
Building Face
traffic signalization system for the Borough core – as well streetscape and transportation projects are developed
Building Face
as to complete specific phases of an entire project – such in phases – so that Hanover Borough and its partners
as segments of streetscape improvements or perhaps a can be negotiating funding for future construction
revitalized Center Square. The scope of final engineering improvements as Phase 1 improvements are being
for a preferred Phase 1 construction project will be engineered and built.
determined based on the outcomes of the preliminary
engineering for the Hanover Streetscape improvements.
Preliminary engineering will provide sufficient technical 5. Construction - subsequent phases
and financial data for Hanover Borough to design a As the Streetscape improvements within the Hanover
scalable Phase 1 construction project – including Final Downtown evolve – based on available funding
engineering and environmental clearances – that is opportunities each year and emerging Borough priorities,
based upon an achievable phased funding strategy. there may be opportunities for the Borough conduct
Final engineering will be produced to meet PennDOT priority improvements within its own municipal rights
standards – since major portions of future streetscape of way that are concurrent with PennDOT improvement
improvements are likely to be developed within phases within the state highway rights of way. One
PennDOT rights of way, and since TA funding available example might be that the Borough could embark on
Railroad Street -
directly to Hanover Borough requires adherence to the
PennDOT project development system.
its own “Green Alleys” improvement program that runs
concurrent with PennDOT improvements. The key to
coordinating state and local streetscape improvements
Green Alley Concept
4. Construction – Phase 1 Green Alley as phases is to ensure that the Preliminary Engineering
HANOVER
HANOVER
phase delivers a comprehensive traffic and geometric
Construction of a Phase 1 streetscape improvement analyses of both state highways and local corridors Pedestrian Space
Building Face
project will impact traffic patterns and will likely – so that final designs for both are based on a united
Building Face
cause some disruptions to local businesses during the transportation improvement strategy.
construction term. Maintenance of traffic plans and Considering the complexity of the state highway facilities
public access to businesses during highway construction within central Hanover, and the PennDOT project
are part of a PennDOT final design program – and local development process, the Borough and its partners
residents and businesses can participate actively with should estimate a minimum of five years to move the
the Borough and PennDOT agents to acknowledge local project through preliminary and final engineering
needs and construction realities by all parties – prior stages to be ready to complete a TA-funded Phase 1
to construction beginning. Depending upon multiple construction project – whatever that implemetation
factors – including priority physical improvement needs priority is ultimately determined to be.
and funding available for those construction years, a 19’ Existing (Typ)
The Streetscape Design & Beautification Plan suggests improvement (Emergency Vehicles Only)
alternatives that may increase pedestrian and automobile safety,
reinforce Hanover’s unique cultural identity, and provide an economic
foundation for the future. Green Alley Concept
Broadway -
State Roads
Building Face
Pedestrian
Building Face
What is a Streetscape?
Every streetscape is unique to its place,
but many include the following common elements:
Benefits of Streetscape
Improvements
A
A
Public infrastructure in the Hanover Borough central core clearly needs rehabilitation
that is based on a smart, community-driven vision.
This Streetscape Design and Beautification Plan 2018 is a bold first step for Hanover
Borough that establishes a consensus vision and charts a course for its downtown
renaissance. Several next steps must follow to prepare for future physical changes.
Placemaking
The concept of “placemaking” is important to communities where people seek to retain
and feature their unique identities as a means to conserve the heritage for residents and
attract visitors and businesses to support appropriate economic development activities.
Transportation Infrastructure
Transportation elements in Hanover are structured largely around a series of PennDOT
highways that converge within the Borough “core.” Intersecting with these state
highway corridors are a network of municipal streets and alleys owned and maintained
by Hanover Borough.
This grid of urban corridors with differing scales and services creates a framework of
public rights of ways and access ways to private properties that front on these corridors.
This Hanover Borough streetscape plan—like most existing urban areas, is developed
around the structure of its transportation elements. And these civic corridors influence
decision-making about what program elements can and should be incorporated within
this urban fabric – as well as what and how civic amenities should be expressed.
This first phase of public visioning includes multiple conceptual alternatives that will
require additional engineering analyses before they can be determined to be “feasible.”
The options described in this 2018 plan represent a variety of ideas from the public and
are prepared with the best available data. Neither a Center Square roundabout, nor
an improved crossroads intersection is recommended at this stage. Both alternative
geometries are offered for technical and financial feasibility in the next phase of
“preliminary engineering” analyses.
Beautification / Amenities
The geometric options for Center Square and the approaching state highways must be
assessed by traffic modeling that is integrated with vehicular movements through local
streets and alleys – to ensure that the final streetscape plan is based on comprehensive
analyses of regional traffic and local traffic patterns through the downtown core.
Once the preferred vehicular network is identified for the state and local roads in the
central business district, then the options for streetscape treatments and amenities can
be assessed for feasibility and community preferences, and the roadway geometry can
be developed to ensure that it creates the best possible opportunities to provide the
supporting transportation infrastructure – including: transit stations, parking, utility
relocations, green infrastructure and storm water facilities. Furniture selections, tree
species, signage designs, and material palettes are all design elements that developed
during and after the preliminary engineering phase.
Study Area
The Streetscape study area represents a portion of the Main Street District (Central
Business District) that is walkable with a high concentration of retail and commercial
business that comprises twenty-two blocks surrounding Center Square in downtown
Hanover Borough. Both the main Street District and the Streetscape study area are
aligned with major state arteries leading into Hanover, including 94, 116, and 194.
The primary objective of the Streetscape Planning process is to engage the community
to articulate the essence of what makes Hanover unique, and use that spirit as the
inspiration to create a final plan to shape the future for the Borough Central Business
District.
Project Tasks
The professional team of Simone Collins Landscape Architecture and Barton &
Loguidice was selected by the Borough of Hanover, with input from Main Street
Hanover and the community to help refine the community’s vision; plan for
streetscape improvements; prepare conceptual design drawings and preliminary costs
for construction phases. Project tasks included:
Within those five primary tasks, a wide variety streetscape program elements and
alternative treatments were identified and assessed, including:
Products include draft and final reports; preliminary cost estimates; and photo-
simulations of potential streetscape treatment options. Borough of Hanover Streetscape:
11
Design & Beautification Plan
02
Inventory and
Analysis
Data Collection and Methodology
Data included in this report was compiled from various sources, including the Borough of Hanover, York
County, Pennsylvania FirstMap, Strava (Heat Maps), previous planning studies, and field reconnaissance data
obtained by the consultant.
Geographic Information System (GIS) base mapping was used to prepare field maps and planning documents
consisting of the base aerial photography, municipal boundaries,roadways, sidewalks, parcels, and other
identifying land use features.
ST
ST
UT
AY
TN
DW
ES
CH
OA
RA
IL
BR
RO
AD
ST
CA
RL
IS
LE
ST
FR
AN
KL
NI
ST
ST
T
TNU YOR
S KS
T
C HE
BA
LT
IM
O
ST
RE
K
ST
C
E RI
D
FRE
HI
G
H
ST
ST
LE
DD
MI
Hanover grew as a commercial hub as a direct result of this important location. The first railroad was built in
1852, connecting the town to the county seat in York. This rail line was later expanded to connect Hanover to 1938
Baltimore.
Hanover was the site of a Civil War battle just prior to the Battle of Gettysburg and is one of several towns on
the ‘Follow me to 1863’ PA Civil War Trail through south-central Pennsylvania, as marketed by the PA Tourism
Office.
The Borough continued to grow and expand residentially through the 19th and 20th centuries. Present day
Hanover remains connected to the region as a hub of important state highways. During the modernization
frenzy of the 1960s and 70s, Hanover Central Square was impacted by several “modern” architectural
renovations that are now impediments to economic redevelopment efforts at the heart of the Borough.
1957
Center Square - 19th Century Center Square - 19th Century 1971 *Traffic Circle removed 1968
OXFORD
CA
RLI
SLE
RD
PK
N
OW
LST
OU
M
HEIDELBERG
WE R DR
EISENHO
)
ed
EIC
in
rm
HE
te
RD
de
LB
be
RK
ER
(to
YO
GE
l
CA
ai
T
tr
AY S
RS
RL
ure
ut
ISL
ADW
F
ES
BRO
T
HIGH ST
O
XF
GRA
NT D
O
R
RD
AV
il
HANOVER Tr
a
L AV
ll ey
BOROUGH Tr
o
MOU
v er
no W
ADAMS LM ST Ha IL
SO
E N
AV
RIDGE
AV
ELM AV
CE
YORK
ST
STOCK
NT
ER
ST
ST
THIRD ST THIRD ST
MCSHERRYSTOWN
DLE
RA
HI
IL
GH
MID
ST
RO
ST
AIN
TH
AD
M
ST
IRD
PENN
ST
PO
SON
PL
AR
ST
ST YOR
ST
FER
KS
T
UT ST
TN CK
JEF
I
ES R
BL CH E DE
ET FO FR
TN RN
ER
AV EY
AV BLOOM
ING GR
OVE RD
BL
GRANDVIEW RD
ET
TN
BA
ER
LT
AV AV
IM
RY
O
RE
A
BE
D
UN
ST
CK
BO
Legend
MI
LL
CONEWAGO
RD
State Road
Local Road
R AV
Parcel Line
M
INISTE
O
UN
Study Area
T
PL
Bike Route S
WESTM
EA
BLACK R
OCK RD
SA
Bike Route JS
NT
R
NARROW D
O
16
HA
WEST MANHEIM
HA
NO
VE
RS RD
R
T PL
E BERWICK
AP
OXFORD
CA
RLI
SLE
RD
PK
N
OW
LST
OU
M
HEIDELBERG
WE R DR
EISENHO
)
ed
EIC
in
rm
HE
te
RD
de
LB
be
RK
ER
(to
YO
GE
l
CA
ai
T
tr
AY S
RS
RL
ure
ut
ISL
ADW
F
ES
BRO
T
HIGH ST
O
XF
GRA
NT D
O
R
RD
AV
il
HANOVER Tr
a
L AV
ll ey
BOROUGH Tr
o
MOU
v er
no W
ADAMS LM ST Ha IL
SO
E N
AV
RIDGE
AV
ELM AV
CE
YORK
ST
STOCK
NT
ER
ST
ST
THIRD ST THIRD ST
MCSHERRYSTOWN
DLE
RA
HI
IL
GH
MID
ST
RO
ST
AIN
TH
AD
M
ST
IRD
PENN
ST
PO
SON
PL
AR
ST
ST YOR
ST
FER
KS
T
UT ST
TN CK
JEF
I
ES R
BL CH E DE
ET FO FR
TN RN
ER
AV EY
AV BLOOM
ING GR
OVE RD
BL
GRANDVIEW RD
ET
TN
BA
ER
LT
AV AV
MI
RY
O
RE
A
BE
D
UN
ST
Legend
CK
BO
MI
LL
Local Road
R AV
Parcel Line
M
INISTE
O
Study Area
UN
T
Historic District
PL
WESTM
EA
BLACK R
OCK RD
Listed
SA
NT
0 50 100 200
Undetermined
PK
R
VE
R
NARROW D
O
17
HA
WEST MANHEIM
Chapter 2 : Inventor y and Analysis
Industry
Known for its history of manufacturing
Commerce
Variety of locally-owned retail and
entertainment opportunities
History
The Borough offers rich history
including a battle during the Civil War
Politics
Governed by a Mayor and a
10-member Council
Population
Total Population
15,607
People live in Hanover Borough
Population Density (Per Square Mile) *Data from United States Census Bureau 2017 Estimates
Income
Total Population
Average Household Income *Data from United States Census Bureau 2010 Data - Adjusted for 2016 Inflation
Demographics
Age
Under 5 Years
5 to 9 Years
10 to 14 Years
Total Population
15 to 17 Years
18 to 24 Years
25 to 34 Years
35 to 44 Years
45 to 54 Years
55 to 64 Years
65 to 74 Years
75 to 84 Years
Asian Alone
10 to 19 Minutes
Commute
It takes 10-19 minutes for
20 to 29 Minutes most to commute to work
30 to 39 Minutes
40 to 59 Minutes
60 to 89 Minutes
90 or More Minutes
Workers
Inflow and outflow of workers
in Hanover Borough
Hanover Borough & Penn Township Joint 1. As the planning process continues to evolve on a regional and county-wide
Comprehensive Plan (2015)
level, review existing plans with a downtown Hanover perspective and consider the
The Hanover Borough & Penn Township Joint Comprehensive Plan was released impact and involvement of Main Street Hanover.
in March 2015. Several recommendations were presented to improve the vitality of 2. Continue to utilize the Main Street Four-Point ® Approach, a community-driven,
downtown, including: comprehensive strategy used to revitalize downtowns throughout the United States.
The four points are organization, design, economic restructuring, and promotion.
1. Take aggressive action to move neglected and underutilized properties back to
Design recommendations include:
productive use
a. Develop a streetscape plan for specific areas of downtown and address
2. Lead a redevelopment project
sidewalk improvement, signage, gateways, and waste disposal;
3. Review and revise permitted uses in the central business district to focus on
b. Consider all aspects of the use of bike and pedestrian facilities to
those most relevant to the downtown vision
improve movement and walkability while increasing safety, accessibility,
4. Improve sidewalk and crosswalk conditions
convenience, connectivity, and comfort;
5. Make improvements to street lights, street furniture, and trash/recycling cans
c. Begin by focusing on improving a two block area around Center Square.
consistent with the character of other design improvements;
The Streetscape Plan helps to address these recommendations by developing
6. Increase greenspace on Center Square
a streetscape that is focused on the downtown core of the Borough, in the
Main Street District.
The Borough can also consider allowing mixed-use, where business, office and
residential uses may occupy the same building, as a permitted use within the GB
District provided that:
1. With the exception of legal home occupations, no business, entertainment, office use
or retail business shall be located on the same floor that is used for residential purposes.
2. No floor may be used in whole or in part for business or office use or retail business
on a floor located above a floor used for residential purposes.
3. Where there are non-residential and residential uses in a building, the residential
uses shall be provided with separate, private entrances.
The Borough may also consider adaptively reusing older structures or buildings with
local historical significance as options for new mixed-use projects. These structures
can add value to the local economy, and contribute to the Borough revitalization in a
repurposed fashion.
An Economic Development Plan for Hanover Borough and Penn Township was
prepared in December 2012, with notes below:
ST
ST
UT
AY
TN
DW
ES
CH
OA
RA
IL
BR
RO
AD
ST
CA
RL
IS
LE
ST
FR
AN
KL
NI
ST
ST
UT
S TN YOR
KS
T
C HE
BA
LT
IM
O
ST
RE
CK
ST
ERI
ED
FR
HI
G
H
ST
ST
LE
DD
MI
Legend
General Business
Local Business
1 - 4 Family Dwelling
Office and Apartment
ST
UT
AY
TN
DW
ES
CH
OA
RA
IL
BR
RO
AD
ST
CA
RL
IS
LE
ST
FR
AN
KL
NI
ST
ST
UT
S TN YOR
KS
T
C HE
BA
LT
IM
O
ST
RE
CK
ST
ERI
ED
FR
HI
G
H
ST
ST
LE
DD
MI
Legend
State Road
Local Street
Alley
ST
ST
UT
AY
TN
DW
ES
CH
OA
RA
IL
BR
RO
AD
ST
CA
RL
IS
LE
ST
FR
AN
KL
NI
ST
ST
UT
S TN YOR
KS
T
C HE
BA
LT
IM
O
ST
RE
CK
ST
ERI
ED
Bike Routes Legend FR
HI
Route JS
G
H
ST
Route J2
ST
LE
Route S
DD
MI
Bus Routes Legend
Bus 16
Bus 20N
Bus 20S
Bus 22N
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
! ! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !!
!! !
Utilities Legend !
!
!
Water !! ! !
!
! Hydrants
!
Stormwater !
Manhole !
Drainage Inlet !
!
Sanitary !!
!
Manhole! !
!
!
!
! !
Utilities Map
!
! *Not
! Comprehensive 0 50 100 200
Compiled From Available Data !
!
! !! !
! !
!
Borough of Hanover Streetscape:
30 Design & Beautification Plan
!
!
!
!
Site Reconnaissance
Observing conditions in Hanover was an important part of
the planning process and enabled the planning team to better
understand the opportunities, constraints, and challenges
present within the study area.
The design team observed existing traffic patterns, pedestrian uses of the four
quadrants, existing ecology, and activities of local businesses.
Apron - None
Splitters - None
Gettysburg, PA
Signals - None
Apron - None
Splitters - None
Existing Conditions
Hanover, PA
Signals - None
Apron - None
Splitters - None
Option 1: Option 2:
Updated Crossroad One Lane Roundabout (large)
An updated “crossroad” alternative for Center Square would retain the basic The larger non-signalized roundabout is also depicted as a one-lane intersection
intersection geometry and focus on modernizing and reducing the number of traffic with a larger turning radius, but still requires a mountable concrete apron and a
signals within the Center Square from the existing eight to four. center island that remains inaccessible to pedestrians. The larger roundabout as
shown also assumes that one lane is sufficient to serve traffic volumes and turning
This change has the potential to simplify vehicular and pedestrian movements movements from all four directions. A modification to a two-lane version of this
through the intersection by creating a single stop bar and crosswalk at each of the geometry would convert some or all of the mountable apron to vehicular travel
four approach streets. Design implications within the Square area include likely lane. This option also encroaches more into the quadrant areas due to the larger
geometric modifications to existing parking areas within some or all of the four roundabout circumference.
quadrants. The modifications to traffic signals within Center Square would need to
be coordinated with modifications to traffic signals along all approach streets – to
create a single synchronized system.
The small roundabout design appears to create the least impacts to the existing A public discussion of how a new civic space in the center of the square might be used is
geometry of the four quadrants, but all roundabout designs will need to be assessed needed during the engineering feasibility phase to ensure that those considerations are
in terms of modern geometric standards for driveway entrances and road lane included in the decision-making.
queuing distances.
One issue that will need to be assessed for any non-signalized roundabout
intersection is how would the signals at the surrounding intersections affect the flow
of traffic through Center Square.
This analysis demonstrates ample parking within the Project Area Parking Project Area Parking
Main Street District, with possible coordination with
private parking lots for more spaces if needed.
38 Acres 38 Acres
15,289 16,440
Hanover Population Phoenixville Population
502 400
Total Public Total Public
Parking Spaces Available Parking Spaces Available
YS
UT
WA
TN
ES
D
OA
CH
BR
RA
IL
RO
AD
ST
E
AV
RK
PA
P7
P8
ST
NUT
ST
P9
FR
E
CH
AN
KL
IN
ST
P6
Number of Parking Lot Spaces
P1 8
P2 8
P3 7 YOR
KS
T
P4 9 CA
RL
P5 62 IS
LE
ST P1
P6 28
P7 47
ST
DLE
P2 P4
P8 73
MID
DO
P9 45
SS
BA
AL
LT
P3
P10 42
LE
IM
ST
Y
CK
RE
Total 329
I
ER
ST
ED
FR
Franklin St 31
H
ST
Chestnut St 13
Frederick St 12
Broadway St 17
Middle St 6
Total 173
LE
NT
D
ID
EN
Total 502 M
NI
ST
AL
K
ST
IC
DER
FRE
Parking Asset
Currently, over 500 public parking spaces are located justified. There may be a time in the future of Hanover
within the Main Street District. Public comments Borough when growth will require a full parking study –
have included the idea that additional public parking including the possibility of a parking structure.
is needed – possibly in the form of a parking structure.
An alternative solution to meet peak parking demands
This type of project is a capital-intensive undertaking and
– such as the need of special events, should be a
requires careful financial analyses as a feasibility study of
comprehensive analyses of existing private parking areas
its own – based on firm projections of new populations
that may be capable of serving as a cooperative public
that would be willing to pay the amortization of a new
parking system when needed for public events. This
structure in the form of higher parking rates and higher
strategy will require creative cooperative agreements with
market rents.
private property owners. Given the current number of
Given the reasonable current parking rates in Hanover public spaces within the downtown area, the proposed
and the available public parking spaces in the downtown directional signage system should be developed first to
core, future parking demand needs to be proven before help visitors navigate to those existing facilities.
any large capital investment in a parking structure can be
Traffic Challenge
Traffic in every community is a double-edged issue. The volumes through Hanover Borough in the near of
public thoroughfares become congested as populations mid-range future. Attempting to reduce any type of
increase and as additional automobiles are added to local commercial traffic through Center Square also poses the
households. Visitor and through-traffic remains essential risk of lowering economic vitality within the Borough
for commerce and economic development – and the idea center – especially if alternatives such as public transit,
of creating a future “bypass” for state highway traffic that bike trails, and possibly green alleys are not pursued to
would detour major traffic volumes around the Central their greatest potentials as first steps toward reducing
Square area is a multi-year, regional feasibility study that traffic congestion through downtown Hanover Borough.
has not become a major community intention. The preliminary engineering feasibility study identified
as the next logical step in the Hanover streetscape
Attempting to remove large truck traffic through improvement initiative will help deliver hard data to
Hanover Centerin the form of a “bypass” might be enable the Borough and its partners to make informed
eventually be developed, but it is a strategy for the next decisions about its future partnerships with PennDOT.
generation, and will not help alleviate Truck traffic
Borough of Hanover Streetscape:
40 Design & Beautification Plan
Aging Infrastructure Challenge Economic Vitality Challenge
The streetscape improvement study process is Thanks to the efforts Downtown Hanover with the
a comprehensive means to address individual Borough and other partners, there is a resurgence in the
infrastructure resources collectively – including economic vitality of Hanover Borough. There appear
all transportation elements, as well as stormwater to be multiple opportunities to re-inhabit underutilized
management – as part of the Borough’s MS4 planning, properties within the Borough center. Approximately 10
and other utilities within the Center Square area. Any vacant storefronts were observed in the downtown area
federally-funded streetscape project on public rights- as of July 2018.
of-ways will require that the Borough address potential
impacts to the utilities, environmental and historic In tandem with Hanover streetscape improvement
resources and civic concerns from the community. As efforts, government and NGO partners can continue
the next preliminary engineering phase progresses, formalizing the economic planning element of the overall
data on all aspects of the public infrastructure will revitalization strategy for Hanover Borough. A similar
be developed that enables the Borough to work with type of visioning-analyses process as the Streetscape
utilities, and public and private sector partners to process can be conducted to systematically assess what
envision a comprehensive strategy for bringing Hanover types of development the Borough can attract and what
Borough infrastructure into the 21st Century while the local and regional markets will support in Downtown
conserving its essential heritage features. Hanover. Based on the successful civic engagement
of the streetscape visioning process, it is considered a
good time to engage the larger businesses with Hanover
Borough to participate proactively in the process of
envisioning a comprehensive ecomomic development
strategy for the Borough Center area.
A total of six meetings were conducted with the project committee, the general Public Meeting 1: April 11, 2018
public, Borough Council, business representatives and partner agencies – representing
approximately 30% of the project resources toward meeting directly with stakeholders. Attendees were asked to interact with three exhibits prior to the start of the
presentation. This exercised allowed attendees to express their interests and help
shape the future streetscape plan. The three boards were: 1. Where Do You Go?
Committee Meeting 1: April 2, 2018 2. What is Your Streetscape? (physical elements) 3. What is Your Streetscape?
This introductory meeting introduced all parties involved in the Borough of Hanover (programmatic opportunities). Following the interactive activity at the beginning
Streetscape process. Main Street Hanover and the project committee were in of the meeting, the consultants provided a quick introduction to the project and led
attendance. Simone Collins discussed available data and process. general discssion and brainstorming with the public.
Outcomes
Valuable information was gathered during the extensive public involvement process,
including public dialogue and individual conversations that provided insights into
residents desires, values, their visions for how future public infrastructure systems
might work within Hanover Borough.
Elements that are included in many typical streetscapes are displayed in this section as examples for
consideration and future decisions by the Borough of Hanover and its partners.
Styles exhibited in this section are not specific recommendations for Hanover, but provided as inspiration for
future discussions during subsequent phases of design and public involvement.
Streetscape Elements
Stamped Crosswalks Public Art Streetlights with Banners Public Gathering Space
Increase pedestrian safety and Creates community identity, speaks Decorative streetlights & banners Gathering spaces allow a community
establishes sense of place. to the values of the community. establish an urban ‘vocabulary’. to assemble for all occasions.
At the heart of any future Streetscape improvements lie the geometric and safety requirements for the State
highways that pass through the Center Square and Borough downtown. Any modifications to the existing
PennDOT infrastructure will be based on comprehensive engineering analyses and must meet the Federal
Highway Administration project approval process, as administered by PennDOT. Modernization, safety, and
aesthetic changes occur every day to the state highway system across the Commonwealth through this project
development process. Each highway modifications must follow a clear sequence of stages over a period of years
to reach construction.
Hanover Borough has engaged important partners to develop this “master plan” as the first definitive step toward
realizing its vision to comprehensively improving the downtown streetscape. This study moves the Borough
and its partners beyond the initial conception of “beautification” and identifies how the next phase of safety and
efficiency analyses of the highway infrastructure will set the transportation framework for all future decisions on
beautification and amenity treatments within the Borough core area.
This Conceptual Streetscape Plan is not a final design. The Plan depicts a conceptual hierarchy of three public
This Plan establishes a graphic visualization for elements roadway corridor “types” within the Study area – State
of grey and green infrastructure improvements that were highways, Borough streets, and Borough alleys.
articulated in the public visioning process. The plan
Street trees are depicted as green infrastructure that
also creates the basis for a conceptual-level opinion of
may also be possible to serve in some stormwater
probable cost.
management capacity. At this conceptual level, street
NOTE: A “roundabout” intersection is not depicted in trees are depicted at general urban spacing to help
this version of the Conceptual Streetscape Plan because envision how a fully canopied downtown might look like.
any alteration to the existing geometry and traffic The conceptual planting scheme does not specify species,
signals will require additional engineering analyses but serves as a basis for estimating cost of plant materials
before potential modifications can be determined to be and associated improvements at this preliminary stage.
physically feasible. This report does not recommend any
specific alternative for the Center Square intersection.
Three conceptual roundabout geometries were prepared
for this study in addition to a modified “cross road”
intersection – as potential alternatives that should be
further studied.
Ra
ilr
oa
d
St
.
.
St
ut
tn
es
Ch
e .
Do
Av
ss
k
ar
Al
P
le
y
Loc
ust
St.
t.
lS
ai P8 P7
G
y
P9 Sch
dwa
Fr
ool A
an
ve.
kli
Broa
n
Ra
.
St
Ln
ilr
.
oa
n k P6
Ba
d
St
.
Ca
rli York
sle ay St.
St adw
. P1 B ro
Ra
.
ilr
e
Av
oa
P2 P4
d
ge York
St
lle
Do
St.
.
Co
.
t St
ss
.
St
Al
lnu
ley
ick P3
er
Wa
Ba
d
re
ltim
F
t.
or
S
e
ut
St
Fr
n
st
.
an
e
Ch
kli
n
St
.
P5
P10 .
Pl
e
Legend ang
ch
Ex
Project Area
Center Square
State Road
Hi
gh
Local Street
St
Green Alley
.
Green Core
Planting Buffer
Building
Public Parking
Ce
P1
t.
nt
Private Parking tS
en
u
ni
Driveway aln
Ra
al
W
St
ilr
.
oa
Decorative Crosswalk
d
.
St
Standard Crosswalk St
.
le
Ex. Tree (mature) i dd
M
Ex. Tree (young)
Proposed Tree
Bench
ADA Curb Cut
Do
Bus Shelter
ss
A
Traffic Signal
lle
y
State Route
th
Al
le
y
Ba
.
t St Design & Beautification Plan
or
lnu
e
a
St
W
.
sle
isl
e
St
St
.
.
Chapter 5 : Conceptual Streetscape Plan
Ca
Ca
rli
rli
sle
sle
St
St
.
.
1 2 1 2
Ra
Ra
ilr
ilr
oa
oa
Ra
d
d
St
St
.
Ra
.
.
St
St
ut
ut
tn
tn
es
es
Ch
Ch
e. e.
Do
Do
Av Av
ss
ss
rk rk
Al
Al
Pa Pa
le
le
y
ilr
MAP MAP MAP MAP
ilr
Loc Loc
ust ust
St. St.
. .
oa
l St P7 l St P7
ai P8 ai P8
G G
oa
y
y
P9 Sch P9 Sch
dwa
dwa
Fr
Fr
ool Ave ool Ave
an
an
. .
kli
kli
Broa
Broa
n
n
Ra
Ra
. .
St
St
ilr
ilr
Ln Ln
.
.
oa
oa
nk P6 nk P6
d
d
Ba Ba
St
St
St.
St.
St.
St.
.
.
Middle
Middle
lnut
lnut
d
Wa
Wa
Ca
Ca
rli
rli
York York
St
ay ay
sle
sle
St. St.
dw dw
St
St
P1 oa P1 oa
.
.
Br Br
St
Ra
Ra
ilr
ilr
e. e.
oa
oa
Av P2 P4 Av P2 P4
d
d
ge York ge York
St
St
lle lle
Do
St.
Do
St.
.
.
Co Co
ss
ss
. .
.
Al
Al
St St
ley
ley
ick P3 ick P3
Ba
Ba
er er
.
ed ed
ltim
ltim
Fr Fr
. .
or
or
St St
e
e
ut ut
St
St
Fr
Fr
tn tn
.
.
an
an
es es
kli
kli
Ch Ch
n
n
St
St
3 4 3 4
.
.
P5 P5
P10 P10
. .
Pl Pl
Hi
Hi
ge ge
gh
gh
an an
St
St
ch ch
.
.
Ex Ex
Ce
. .
nt
nt
t St t St
en
en
ni
ni
alnu alnu
Ra
Ra
al
al
W W
St
St
ilr
ilr
.
.
oa
oa
d
d
St
St
.
.
Do
Do
ss
ss
Al
Al
le
le
y
y
Ru
Ru
th
th
t.
Al
Al
le
le
y
y
Ba
Ba
ltim
ltim
. .
t St . t St .
or
or
alnu St alnu St
e
tS
e e
St
St
W dl W dl
.
.
id id
M M
nu
st
e
Ch
.
Ca
.
Ca
rli
rli
sle
sle
St
ve
St
.
1 2 1 2 ve
Do
Ra
Do
Ra
ilr
ilr
oa
oa
d
d
St
St
.
A
.
St
.
St
A
ut
ut
tn
tn
es
es
Ch
ss
Ch
e.
Do
e.
k
Av
Do
Av
ss
rk
ss
rk
Al
Pa
ss
Al
Pa
le
k
le
y
r
y
Pa
. .
l St
Al
ai P8 P7 l St P7
G ai P8
G
Al
P
y
P9 Sch
dwa
y
Fr
dwa
Fr
an
ool Ave
an
.
kli
Broa
.
kli
Broa
n
Ra
.
n
Ra
St
le
.
ilr
Ln
St
.
ilr
Ln
oa
P6
.
nk
oa
P6
d
Ba nk
d
St
le
Ba
St.
St
St.
.
St.
St.
.
Middle
lnut
Middle
lnut
Wa
Wa
y
Ca
Ca
rli
York
y
rli
ay York
sle
St. ay
sle
dw St.
St
oa dw
St
P1
.
Br P1 oa
.
Br
Ra
Ra
ilr
e.
ilr
oa
Av P4 e.
oa
P2 Av P4
d
ge P2
d
York
St
lle ge York
St
Do
St.
.
lle
Do
St.
.
Co
ss
Co
ss
.
Al
St .
Al
ley
P3 St
ley
ick P3
Ba
er ick
Ba
ed er
ltim
Fr ed
ltim
. Fr
or
St .
or
e
ut St
e
St
Fr
tn ut
St
Fr
.
an
es tn
.
an
es
kli
Ch
kli
n
Ch
n
St
St
3 4 3 4
.
P5
.
P5
P10 P10
. .
Pl
Hi
ge Pl
Hi
gh
an ge
gh
an
St
ch
St
ch
.
Ex
.
Ex
MAP MAP
Ce
MAP MAP
Ce
.
nt
.
nt
t St
en
t St
en
ni
alnu
ni
Ra
al
alnu
Ra
al
W
St
ilr
W
St
ilr
.
oa
oa
d
d
St
St
.
.
Do
Do
ss
ss
Al
Al
le
le
y
y
Ru
Ru
th
th
Al
Al
le
le
y
y
Ba
Ba
ltim
.
ltim
t St .
. t St
or
.
alnu
or
St
e
e alnu St
e
St
W dl e
St
.
id W dl
.
M id
M
t . t.
il S ail S P7 P8
a G P8
G
P9
Fr
P9
Fr
an
an
kli
kli
n
n
Ra
.
St
St
Ln
ilr
.
.
oa
n k
Ba
Ca
Ca
rli
rli
sle
sle
St P1
.
. e.
e
Av Av P4P
e e P2
ll eg ll eg
Do
Co
Do
Co
ss
ss
.
Al
kS
Design & Beautification Plan
ley
ley
ic P3 ri
r e
Ba
de ed
l
ti
Legend
Ca
Ca
rli
rli
sle
sle
St
St
.
.
1 2 1 2
Ra
Ra
ilr
ilr
oa
oa
d
d
St
St
.
.
.
.
St
St
ut
ut
tn
tn
Project Area
es
es
Ch
Ch
e. e.
Do
Do
Av Av
ss
ss
rk rk
Al
Al
Pa Pa
le
le
y
y
MAP MAP MAP MAP
Loc Loc
ust ust
St. St.
Center Square
. .
l St P7 l St P7
ai P8 ai P8
G G
y
P9 Sch P9 Sch
dwa
dwa
Fr
Fr
ool Ave ool Ave
an
an
. .
kli
kli
Broa
Broa
n
n
Ra
Ra
State Road
. .
St
St
ilr
ilr
Ln Ln
.
oa
oa
nk P6 nk P6
d
Ba Ba
St
St
St.
St.
St.
St.
.
.
Middle
Middle
0 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 200'
lnut
lnut
Wa
Wa
Ca
Ca
rli
rli
York York
ay ay
sle
sle
St. St.
Local Street
dw dw
St
St
P1 oa P1 oa
.
Br Br
Ra
Ra
ilr
ilr
e. e.
oa
oa
Av P2 P4 Av P2 P4
d
ge York ge York
St
St
lle lle
Do
St.
Do
St.
.
Co Co
ss
ss
. .
Al
Al
St St
ley
ley
ick P3 ick P3
Ba
Ba
er er
Green Alley
ed ed
ltim
ltim
Fr Fr
. .
or
or
St St
e
ut ut
St
St
Fr
Fr
tn tn
.
an
an
es es
kli
kli
Ch Ch
n
St
St
3 4 3 4
.
P5 P5
P10 P10
Pl
.
Pl
.
Green Core
Hi
Hi
ge ge
gh
gh
an an
St
St
ch ch
.
Ex Ex
Ce
Ce
. .
nt
nt
t St t St
en
en
ni
ni
alnu alnu
Ra
Ra
al
al
W W
St
St
ilr
ilr
.
.
oa
oa
d
d
St
St
.
.
Building
Do
Do
ss
ss
Al
Al
le
le
y
y
t.
Ru
Ru
th
th
Al
Al
Public Parking
le
le
y
y
Ba
Ba
tS
ltim
ltim
. .
t St t St
P1
. .
or
or
alnu St alnu St
e
e e
St
St
W dl W dl
.
id id
M M
Private Parking
nu
Driveway
st
Decorative Crosswalk
Ca
Ca
rli
rli
sle
sle
St
St
.
.
1 2 1 2
Ra
Ra
ilr
Standard Crosswalk
ilr
oa
oa
d
d
St
St
.
.
.
St
.
St
ut
ut
tn
tn
es
es
Ch
Ch
e.
Do
Av e.
Do
Av
ss
rk
ss
Ex. Tree (mature)
rk
Al
Pa
Al
Pa
le
le
y
y
MAP MAP MAP MAP
Loc Loc
ust ust
St. St.
. .
l St P7 l St
ai P8 ai P7
G
y
P9 Sch
dwa
y
Fr
ool Ave P9 Sch
dwa
Fr
an
ool Ave
an
.
kli
Broa
.
kli
Broa
n
Ra
.
Ra
St
.
ilr
Ln
St
.
ilr
Ln
oa
P6
.
nk
oa
P6
d
Ba nk
d
St
Ba
St.
St
St.
.
St.
St.
Proposed Tree
.
Middle
lnut
Middle
lnut
Wa
Wa
Ca
Ca
rli
York
rli
ay York
sle
St. ay
sle
dw St.
St
oa dw
St
P1
.
Br P1 oa
.
Br
Bench
Ra
Ra
ilr
e.
ilr
oa
Av P4 e.
oa
P2 Av P4
d
ge P2
d
York
St
lle ge York
St
Do
St.
.
lle
Do
St.
.
Co
ss
Co
ss
.
Al
St .
Al
ley
P3 St
ley
ick P3
Ba
er ick
Ba
ed er
ltim
Fr ed
ltim
. Fr
or
St .
or
e
ut St
e
St
Fr
tn ut
St
Fr
ADA Curb Cut
.
an
es tn
.
an
es
kli
Ch
kli
n
Ch
n
St
St
3 4 3 4
.
P5
.
P5
P10 P10
Bus Shelter
. .
Pl
Hi
ge Pl
Hi
gh
an ge
gh
an
St
ch
St
ch
.
Ex
.
Ex
Ce
MAP MAP
Ce
.
nt
.
nt
t St
en
Traffic Signal
t St
en
ni
alnu
ni
Ra
al
alnu
Ra
al
W
St
ilr
W
St
ilr
.
oa
oa
d
d
St
St
.
.
ust Light Post & Masthead
Do
Do
ss
ss
Al
St.
Al
le
le
y
y
Ru
Ru
th
th
Al
Al
le
le
y
y
Ba
Ba
ltim
.
ltim
t St .
Traffic Direction
. t St
or
.
alnu
or
St
e
e alnu St
e
St
W dl e
St
.
id W dl
.
M id
M
State Route
P7
way
Sch
ool A
ve.
d
Broa
Ra
.
Ln
ilr
oa
n k P6
Ba
d
St
.
y York
wa St.
e
d
oa
St
P1 Br
.
Ra
i lro
P4
ad
P2
York
St
St.
.
.
t St
St
P1 ro
.
B
e .
Av P2 P4
e
ll eg
Do
Co
ss
t .
Al
S
ley
ic k P3
r
Ba
ede
ltim
Fr
t.
or
S
e
ut
St
Fr
stn
a
he
nk
lin
St
.
P10 .
Pl
nge
cha
Ex
Hi
gh
St
.
Legend
Ca
Ca
rli
rli
sle
sle
St
St
.
1 2 1 2
Project Area
Ra
Ra
ilr
ilr
oa
oa
d
d
St
St
.
.
Ce
.
.
St
St
ut
ut
tn
tn
Center Square
es
es
Ch
Ch
e. e.
Do
Do
Av Av
ss
ss
rk rk
Al
Al
Pa Pa
le
le
y
t.
nt
St. St.
State Road
. .
l St P7 l St P7
ai P8 ai P8
G G
S
en
y
P9 Sch P9 Sch
dwa
dwa
Fr
Fr
an
. .
ut
kli
kli
Broa
Broa
n
n
Ra
Ra
Local Street
. .
St
St
ilr
ilr
Ln Ln
.
.
oa
oa
nk P6 nk P6
d
Ba Ba
St
St
St.
St.
St.
St.
.
.
Middle
Middle
lnut
lnut
Wa
Wa
ni
aln
Ca
Ca
rli
rli
York York
ay ay
sle
sle
St. St.
Green Alley
dw dw
St
St
P1 oa P1 oa
.
Br Br
al
Ra
Ra
ilr
ilr
e. e.
oa
oa
Av P2 P4 Av P2 P4
d
ge York ge York
St
St
lle lle
Do
St.
Do
St.
.
Co Co
ss
ss
. .
Al
Al
St St
ley
ley
ick P3 ick P3
W
Ba
Ba
er er
Green Core
ed ed
ltim
ltim
Fr Fr
. .
or
or
St
St St
e
ut ut
St
St
Fr
Fr
tn tn
.
.
an
an
es es
kli
kli
Ch Ch
n
n
St
St
3 4 3 4
.
P5 P5
P10 P10
Planting Buffer
.
. .
Pl Pl
Hi
Hi
ge ge
gh
gh
an an
St
St
ch ch
.
Ex Ex
Ce
. .
nt
nt
t St t St
en
en
ni
ni
alnu alnu
Ra
Ra
al
al
W W
St
St
ilr
ilr
.
.
oa
oa
d
d
St
St
.
Public Parking P1
Do
Do
ss
ss
Al
Al
le
le
y
y
Ru
Ru
th
th
Al
Al
Private Parking
le
le
y
y
Ba
Ba
ltim
ltim
. .
t St . t St .
or
or
alnu St alnu St
e
e e
St
St
W dl W dl
.
id id
M M
Driveway
Private Green Space
Decorative Crosswalk
Standard Crosswalk
Ca
Ca
rli
rli
sle
sle
St
St
.
1 2 1 2
Ra
Ra
ilr
oa
d
d
St
St
.
.
.
St
.
St
ut
ut
tn
tn
es
es
Ch
Ch
e.
Do
Av e.
Do
Av
ss
rk
ss
Pa
Al
Pa
le
le
y
. .
l St P7 l St
ai P8 ai P7
G
Proposed Tree
G P8
y
P9 Sch
dwa
y
Fr
ool Ave
an
.
kli
Broa
.
kli
Broa
n
Ra
.
n
Ra
St
.
ilr
Ln
St
.
ilr
Ln
oa
P6
.
nk
oa
P6
d
Ba nk
d
St
Ba
St.
St
St.
.
St.
St.
Bench
.
Middle
lnut
Middle
lnut
Wa
Wa
Ca
Ca
rli
York
rli
ay York
sle
St. ay
sle
dw St.
St
oa dw
St
P1
.
Br P1 oa
.
Br
Ra
ilr
e.
ilr
oa
Av P4 e.
oa
P2 Av P4
d
ge P2
d
York
St
lle ge York
St
Do
St.
.
lle
Do
St.
.
Co
ss
Co
ss
.
Al
St .
Al
ley
P3 St
ley
ick P3
Ba
er ick
Ba
ed er
ltim
Fr ed
ltim
. Fr
or
St .
or
e
ut St
e
St
Fr
tn ut
St
Fr
Bus Shelter
.
an
es tn
.
an
es
kli
Ch
kli
n
Ch
n
St
St
3 4 3 4
.
P5
.
P5
P10 P10
Traffic Signal
. .
Pl
Hi
ge Pl
Hi
gh
an ge
gh
an
St
ch
St
ch
.
Ex
.
Ex
MAP MAP
Ce
MAP MAP
Ce
.
nt
.
nt
t St
en
alnu
ni
Ra
al
alnu
Ra
al
W
St
ilr
W
St
ilr
.
oa
oa
d
d
St
St
.
Traffic Direction
Do
ss
Al
Al
le
le
y
y
Ru
Ru
th
th
Al
Al
le
le
y
y
Ba
Ba
ltim
.
ltim
t St .
State Route
. t St
or
.
alnu
or
St
e
e alnu St
e
St
W dl e
St
.
id W dl
.
M id
M
dw
Ra
ilr
Ra
oa
2 P4
d
ilr
York
St
oa
St.
.
d
St.
York
St
. St.
.
t
lnut
St.
kS P3
Wa
lnut
Ba
ltim
Wa
or
e
St
.
t.
P5
P5
.
Pl
ge
h an
c
Ex
Ca
Ca
rli
rli
sle
sle
t.
St
St
.
.
1 2 Ra
1 2
Ra
ilr
ilr
oa
oa
d
d
S
St
St
.
.
.
.
St
St
ut
ut
ut
tn
tn
es
es
Ch
Ch
e. e.
Do
Do
Av Av
ss
ss
rk rk
Al
Al
Pa Pa
le
le
y
y
aln
MAP MAP MAP MAP
Loc Loc
ust ust
St. St.
Ra
. .
l St P7 l St P7
ai P8 ai P8
G G
y
P9 Sch P9 Sch
dwa
dwa
Fr
Fr
ool Ave ool Ave
an
an
. .
kli
kli
Broa
Broa
W
n
n
Ra
Ra
. .
St
St
ilr
ilr
Ln Ln
.
.
oa
oa
nk P6 nk P6
d
Ba Ba
St
St
St.
St.
St.
St.
.
.
ilr
Middle
Middle
lnut
lnut
Wa
Wa
Ca
Ca
rli
rli
York York
ay ay
sle
sle
Ra
St. St.
oa
dw dw
St
St
P1 oa P1 oa
.
Br Br
Ra
Ra
ilr
ilr
e. e.
oa
oa
Av P2 P4 Av P2 P4
d
ge York ge York
St
St
lle lle
Do
St.
Do
St.
.
Co Co
ss
ss
. .
Al
Al
St St
ley
ley
ick P3 ick P3
Ba
Ba
er er
d
ed ed
ltim
ltim
Fr Fr
ilr
. .
or
or
St St
e
ut ut
St
St
Fr
Fr
tn tn
.
an
an
es es
kli
kli
Ch Ch
n
n
St
St
3 4 3 4
.
.
P5 P5
St
oa
P10 P10
St
. .
Pl Pl
Hi
Hi
ge ge
gh
gh
an an
.
St
St
ch ch
.
.
Ex Ex
d
Ce
. .
nt
nt
t St t St
en
en
ni
ni
alnu alnu
Ra
Ra
al
al
W W
St
St
t.
ilr
ilr
.
.
oa
oa
St
d
St
St
.
.
S id Do
Do
ss
ss
.
Al
Al
le
le
y
y
Ru
Ru
e M
th
th
Al
Al
l
le
le
y
y
Ba
Ba
ltim
ltim
. .
t St . t St .
or
or
alnu St alnu St
e
e e
St
St
dd
W dl W dl
.
id id
M M
i
M
Ca
Ca
rli
rli
sle
sle
St
St
.
1 2 1 2
Ra
Ra
ilr
ilr
oa
oa
d
d
St
St
.
.
Do
.
St
.
St
ut
ut
tn
tn
es
es
Ch
Ch
e.
Do
Av e.
Do
Av
ss
rk
ss
rk
Al
Pa
Al
Pa
le
le
y
y
MAP MAP MAP MAP
Loc Loc
ust ust
St. St.
ss
. .
l St P7 l St
ai P8 ai P7
G G P8
Do
P9 Sch
dwa
y
Fr
dwa
Fr
an
ool Ave
an
.
kli
Broa
.
kli
Broa
n
Ra
.
n
Al
Ra
St
.
ilr
Ln
St
.
ilr
Ln
oa
P6
.
nk
oa
P6
d
Ba nk
d
St
Ba
St.
St
St.
.
St.
St.
.
Middle
lnut
Middle
lnut
Wa
Wa
ss
le
Ca
Ca
rli
York
rli
ay York
sle
St. ay
sle
dw St.
St
oa dw
St
P1
.
Br P1 oa
.
Br
Ra
Ra
ilr
e.
ilr
oa
e.
y
Av P4
oa
P2 Av P4
d
ge P2
d
York
St
lle ge York
St
Do
St.
.
lle
Do
St.
.
Co
ss
Co
ss
.
Al
Al
St .
Al
ley
P3 St
ley
ick P3
Ba
er ick
Ba
ed er
ltim
Fr ed
ltim
. Fr
or
St .
or
e
ut St
e
St
Fr
tn ut
St
Fr
.
an
es tn
.
an
es
kli
Ch
kli
n
Ch
n
St
St
3 4 3 4
.
P5
le
P5
P10 P10
y
. .
Pl
Hi
ge Pl
Hi
gh
an ge
gh
an
St
ch
St
ch
.
Ex
.
Ex
MAP MAP
Ce
MAP MAP
Ce
.
nt
Ru
.
nt
t St
en
t St
en
ni
alnu
ni
Ra
al
alnu
Ra
al
W
St
ilr
W
St
ilr
.
oa
oa
d
d
St
St
.
.
Do
Do
th
ss
ss
Al
Al
le
le
y
y
Ru
Ru
th
th
Al
Al
le
le
y
Ru
y
Ba
Ba
ltim
ltim
t St .
. t St
or
Al
.
alnu
or
St
e
e alnu St
e
St
W dl e
St
.
id W dl
.
M id
M
le
th
y
Al
59
le
ltim
Ba
or
ltim
e
Chapter 5 : Conceptual Streetscape Plan
Conceptual Streetscape
Sections
Building Face
Building Face
These graphic cross-sections were developed to establish a sense of
the general character and scale of three primary types of roadway
corridors within Hanover downtown study area – and to help
begin to visualize how these corridors might be reconceived to
serve multiple compatible purposes in the future. The sections
are not final designs, but serve to articulate some of the potential
design options that need to be vetted in the next phase of Sidewalk Car Lane Car Lane Car Lane Car Lane Sidewalk
engineering analyses.
65’
Existing Conditions: Broadway
Right-of-Ways
Building Face
Building Face
Right-of-Ways
Building Face
Building Face
Building Face
Building Face
HANOVER
HANOVER
Borough streets (including Park Ave, Gail St, Franklin
St, School Ave, Walnut St, Railroad St, Middle St) are
generally 40 to 55 feet wide rights of way. Borough
Sidewalk Car Lane Car Lane Sidewalk Sidewalk Bike Car Lane Car Lane Bike Sidewalk
streets need to be assessed concurrent with the feasibility Lane Lane
HANOVER
HANOVER
of-Ways
HANOVER
HANOVER
Building Face
Building Face
Building Face
Building Face
Building Face
Building Face
These corridors (including Doss Alley, Exchange Pl,
Railroad St, Bank Ln) are smaller Borough streets
and are generally one-way traffic. An alley system was
designed that almost completely surrounds the Center
Square highways, originally as service access to many Pedestrian Space
Side Pedestrian
of the largest properties with frontage on the state walk
Car Lane Car Lane Space
highways. The existing alleys are generally between 14
and 19 feet wide and the network currently functions
13’ to 18’ 4’ 19’ Existing (Typ)
as a heavily-used pedestrian and bicycle alternative to 13’ to 18’ 4’(±)
(Emergency Vehicles Only)
the intensively-used state highway and Borough street 19’ 19’ Existing (Typ)
vehicular routes. In some locations these alleys may offer
Existing Conditions: Doss Alley Improvement Alternative: Doss Alley Improvement Alternative: Doss Alley
the potential to limit traffic to only local residents access,
sanitation services, and emergency vehicles. Under these
treatments, the former vehicular-only alleys offer the
potential to expand storefronts and outdoor commercial
and civic uses – as another marketable layer of the
Borough’s community and economic fabric.
Borough of Hanover Streetscape:
Design & Beautification Plan
61
Chapter 5 : Conceptual Streetscape Plan
Frederick Street
This photo-simulation depicts a variety if potential improvements to Frederick
Street. Pedestrian crosswalks and flashing beacons can sometimes improve
pedestrian safety. Hanover banners attached to new light posts are one opportunity
to reinforce the Hanover “brand” and contribute to the Borough’s visual identity.
Doss Alley
This photo-simulation depicts potential improvements to Doss Alley including:
paved and sharrow bike routes to improve borough connectivity by providing safe
alternatives away from state highways. Permeable pavement and added vegetation
are possible techniques that improve aesthetics and may help to capture stormwater
runoff and improve infiltration throughout the green alley network.
4 Center Square
4.1 Crossroad - modified $ 2,207,903
4.2 Roundabout - large $ 3,358,061
Unit quantities for various improvements were based on takeoffs from concept-level
streetscape diagrams that identify major infrastructure improvements as well as
estimates for amenities that were considered “preferred’ during the public visioning
process. Costs are calculated and tallied per street segments within the project area.
These costs must be considered conceptual level, and initial basis to establish an
order of magnitude costs for an entire project.
Cost breakouts by segment provided in EXCEL file, deliver the preliminary details
of the estimate, so that the Borough and its partners can assess options for what
elements are priorities and alternatives for implementing the project over multiple
phases.
Estimates for utility upgrades and replacements are not included in this estimate. A
comprehensive assessment of utility conditions, needs, and costs is identified to be
a component of the next phase – Preliminary Engineering / Feasibility Analyses – a
phase that is currently pending as funding application by Hanover Borough to the
2018 PA DCED multi-modal grant program.
These conceptual costs include estimates for construction, and estimated line items
for design/engineering, preconstruction environmental clearances/permitting and
construction inspection, mobilization, erosion/sediment controls, and maintenance
of (vehicular and pedestrian) traffic during a construction phase.
The Borough has received the full EXCEL file for the entire segment-by-segment
estimate of probable costs for its detailed review.
Generally, the estimates for public infrastructure costs were developed with the
assumption that current facilities would be removed and replaced with new
preferred facilities – including roadways, sidewalks, curbs, crosswalks. Ornamental
street lights were added as a cost item per segment. This cost estimate assumes that
existing highway lighting along the state highway corridors would remain in place
(as adequate under current regulations.) All assumptions to create this concept-
level cost estimate need to be critically assessed at the next stage of Preliminary
Engineering to determine their level of need, feasible alternatives for improvements
and a higher level of cost estimates that are based on engineering surveys and
utilities assessments.
Sustainable Improvements:
State Highways
The domination of state highways that pass through the center of Hanover is a challenge that other
Pennsylvania communities actively address using a variety of approaches and treatments.
An “outer belt” highway bypass route is not on the horizon for Hanover, and the removal of truck traffic from
the center of town would be accompanied by its own set of economic and social impacts to the Borough.
The Borough Council has submitted a “multi-modal” grant application to the Commonwealth in 2018 to
fund the essential next steps to develop the technical data necessary to advance the decision-making needed
to negotiate future state highway streetscape improvements with PennDOT.
Center Square
Future modifications to Center Square can only be decided after further technical analyses in close
coordination with PennDOT as the steward agency for the three major state highways running through the
central business district.
Borough Streets
Specifically – traffic studies for the Borough core were identified by engineers on the streetscape team
as critical to quantify volumes and movements of vehicular traffic – not only on state roads, but also on
Borough streets and alleys – as the frequently-used local alternatives to avoid and circumvent highway traffic.
A comprehensive assessment of vehicular traffic through the Borough core is essential to inform multiple
transportation and civic decisions – including but not limited to:
Green Alleys
Fortunately, not all priority study and planning tasks that are needed to advance the Hanover Borough
streetscape concepts rely on PennDOT rights of way. Determining the feasibility of a “Green Alley”
system responds to many priorities expressed by residents and should focus on the network of alleys that
directly surround the four Center Square blocks. Additional data and public input are needed to identify
opportunities that include, but are not limited to:
Local Bank
PNC Bank is currently the only local branch to serve the Center
Square area after M&T bank moved its commercial store services
out of the Borough center. PNC has committed to a presence
in downtown Hanover Borough and represents a potential local
funding partner to businesses seeking to locate or expand within
the central downtown core.
Vacant Storefront
Redevelopment Opportunities:
The four-block core area includes at least four major opportunities that have been
identified as redevelopment potentials to various degrees in the past. Each require
significant investment to achieve viability by adaptive reuse or replacement. These
are described as a brief economic redevelopment context to the primary focus of this
streetscape beautification study:
Funding Strategy
Multiple funding sources are available through grants, incentives and other programs for the implementation
of the recommendations proposed in this report. Examples of funding sources are below: